Added: 2 years ago
From: ClimateMadness
Views: 4,258
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "much the same as the raw data on the global climate network" So it isnt the same data,. it is similar, so it isnt Jones' raw data at all, in which case he has been withholding it.

  • gripping viewing 

  • I knew a man with two Phd`s and he was an unreliable idiot.

  • 9.30ish, is that a freudian slip by any chanse? :)

    "...And we MADE UP.... avaliable all the adjustments to our data"

    and slamming his hand like that...i call liar!

  • 9.30ish, is that a freudian slip by any chanse? :)

    "...And we MADE UP.... avaliable all the adjustments to our data"

    and slamming his hand like that...i call liar!

  • 9.30ish, is that a freudian slip by any chanse? :)

    "...And we MADE UP.... avaliable all the adjustments to our data"

    and slamming his hand like that...i call liar!

  • 9.30ish, is that a freudian slip by any chanse? :)

    "...And we MADE UP.... avaliable all the adjustments to our data"

    and slamming his hand like that...i call liar!

  • Comment removed

  • I checked the website he mentiond, the one in the U.S., and it is not oporational!

    LOL

  • Phil Jones goes downhill quickly about 7 minutes into it.

    Galileo Galilei, the first scientist, wrote "In disputes about natural phenomena, one must not begin with the authority of scriptural passages, but with sensory experience and necessary demonstrations." He is right.

    At 8:50, Jones abrogates Galileo's dictum and at precisely 8:56 to 9:00 Galileo is turning over in his grave.

    Jones disgraces the scientifically respectable temperament.

  • Acton is a total wanker

  • this fraudster looks like a broken man

    looks like his fellow fraudsters have pushed jones out to sea

    antiscientific understatement of the year

  • 7:04

    Says it all. This is not science. It is a religion, and challenging it is simply not allowed. Moreover, scientists with opposing views publishing in peer reviewed journals? Oh then say the CRU cabal, we need to dissociate from those journals, costing them money, and if possible shut them down.

  • 2.20 "May I point out, chair, that it is a *very* small unit. There are three full time academic staff within it (blah blah)"

     Acton (the Vice Chancellor) is a bullshitter who gets away with bullshitting the Select Committee.

    The UAE CRU website lists 3 "academic staff".

    Plus 2 professors (acting director and deputy director). Plus a Research Manager/research associate. Plus 6 "research staff", four with doctorates. Plus 11 associate fellows, all with doctorates.

  • 7.57, not a good reply.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more