AB de Villiers's bizarre dismissal

[Tyloo4life]

Bangladesh = Bloody Immigrants

[ThunderStruckBeast69]

/watch?v=ICudsnJUcf8&feature=r­elated

[B1985A]

The most disturbing part of this video is SA are 6/154 against Bangladesh!!

[NickWatcher]

@B1985A When Bangladesh was bowled out for 100.

[B1985A]

@NickWatcher Still doesnt make SA"s innings any better. Bangladesh are hopeless

[NickWatcher]

@B1985A yeah, that's true

[CousinFuckingBoss]

Ashraful always do something unusual lol he will get out he is lukin good ..he starts dancing after pickin up wickets he pick wickets of batsman like AB wiv two bounce ball :D

[neo16280]

Thumbs Up, if you are here because Misbah Survived.

[bhw143]

aleem dar explained to him @ 1:11

[bhw143]

misbah survived today

[nilupul0]

i hope in cricket as well as asshole has only one hole an it is so smelly.

[lazaglider]

@nilupul0 Mate really, if you are going to follow everyone else in your country and troll non asian cricket videos with your racist bile, at least get some knowledge of the language before you try. For now you just make yourself look very stupid.

[strikez157]

Only Bangladesh can bounce the ball twice before the crease xD

[mukarji]

South Africa 155 for 6 wicket down in test.... Bangladesh for moment become very top of all their opposition but then again they lose the plot for some reason and end up loosing....

[rockstaraIishah]

THUMBS UP IF U THINK THIS IS ASHRAFUL SPECIAL LMFAOOOO

[hamza1024]

why did he try to hit it then

[atheist382]

The rule should be changed...Bouncing twice should be a no-ball!

[zokhan100]

He is out fair and square. It's a legal ball even if it did bounce twice. If it had bounced a third time, then it would have been a dead ball. Get your rules right

[ashatbracks]

The only thing that bounced twice was your mother on my cock and it was all over :(

[DAJAZDJ1]

DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT HAPPEND HERE

[BabeiShontaaa302]

hihÌ_ãÑÿÕNè_wàñÑÃ_chåt_wÍth_mÈ­_í_fêel_sÒ_lÓñêlY_tÒÐÀy♫

[TheRunner81]

shit shot he should blame himself

[pollockdonald]

shud try this delivery more often the old two bounce

[ricardinho511]

no.

[cricketDude42]

Shit! look at the score! South Africa are 155-6 against Bangladesh

[goonerX4life]

@cricketDude42 but bangla got raped in the end

[simonbodd]

I'm a scorer and have been informed that a ball will now be called dead upon it either bouncing twice or rolling.

[vicavox]

@simonbodd You should sack the person informing you. Check the RULE BOOK! It CLEARLY states that a delivery will be declared a no-ball if it bounces MORE than twice. Not twice, but MORE than twice. Scoring cricket? You don't even know the basics.

[villafan001]

@vicavox No, the law has now been changed so a delivery bouncing more than once is a no-ball - seems like he does know the basics.

[pubuman]

@villafan001 I have not kept up to date with the rules recently, however even with such a change the umpires decision in this case is correct, as at the time of the incident the rules stated that the ball had to bounce more than twice for it to be a no ball. Do you concur?

[villafan001]

@pubuman Yes, quite right.

[vicavox]

@villafan001 If it wasn't the law at the time your point is redundant. Fact.

[benbigheadacc93]

its a fare ball the second bounce was inside the batsman crise 

[majesticmaniac]

Well if that is a rule, its a wrong rule...because that just changes the whole perspective of how cricket is played today

[xREAV3Rx]

@majesticmaniac how so? cricketers dont want to bowl like that its easier to play he would of bowled it by acident

[dingoDogMan]

@majesticmaniac it doesnt matter how cricket is played "today". they all still have 2 arms and legs

[Jamal92554]

the rule is, is the ball bounces twice of more BEFORE the batting crease, it is a no-ball

[robbo4pm]

@Jamal92554 no, bounces MORE than twice before the popping crease, so it has to bounce at least 3 times to be a no-ball

[Jamal92554]

@robbo4pm soory, three times

[Jamal92554]

@robbo4pm sorry, three times

[phippsa3]

haha shit balls always get wickets!! Ask any club cricketer

[triplebettslord]

@phippsa3 Very true... I always get out to part-timers because I feel a pressure to slog them, hahaha. I guess when a bad ball is bowled, we are expected to club it or else we look bad. It looks far worse when they bring you undone though let me tell you :P. I tried to reverse-sweep a knee-high full toss from a slow arse bowler and it hit me on the pad... More plumb than the bloody fruit, lol.

[damo24now]

yeah i always thought if it had bounced twice. it was an automatic no ball

[aniksh1]

too good a delivery lol

[wallanli]

quite a few years ago mark taylor bowled a ball that bounced twice then hit the stumps, the batsmen given not out back then.....did they have the bouncing twice rule back then? confused.

[ThePakpakistan]

as soon as he took the catch ...crowd in the back started clapping as they knew the rule lolss

[noongar1234]

they seriously need to change the rules about how many times a ball bounces to get a batsman out in professional cricket, once should be legitimate, twice should be illegal?

[laugheverydaytv]

I don't see the problem a second bounce makes it the easiest ball to smash for 6

[juwboi]

this is ridiculous... if a double bounce ball is legal, they should change the rules because if the bowler is good enough to play international cricket and yet still bowls a double bounce balls they should be punished with a no ball. it is just so unfair for the batsman because the bowler has accidentaly done this and got a wicket becuase of it.... this is just stupid

[theonlyusernameleft5]

the rule is it can bounce twice as long as the second bounce is inside the batsman's crease. also don't you think the commentators would know the rules and would not be disputing the dismissal if the ball was legal.

[sunny3394]

fuckin bangladeshis , dnt have enuf energy to bowl te delivery properly. should eat more fish , haha

[tushtushi]

@sunny3394 Where the fuck do you come from you ass biting, cock sucking- chicken-shit eating, balls crunching son-of-a-bitch mother fucker? Have some respect, Otherwise you not gonna get any! And I am sorry that I had to use my french in a public forum like here. But since you are an uncivilised, uncultured, from-the-jungle piece of shit, you definitely deserve it!

[tushtushi]

@sunny3394 Obviously you are the one started And now can see where Pakistanis go their idea, pieces of shit like you. But don't stop on my account. ( You don't deserve a second of my time, so Fuck-off)

[triplebettslord]

@sunny3394 She wanted a big dick, not a big dickhead, so Bangladeshi people would satisfy her better. Maybe they do have small ones (I wouldn't know because I don't check them out ;)), but they couldn't be any smaller than the baby-prawn thing that you were born with.

[intellofreak]

Actually, i think the rule is flawed.. if the ball can bounce twice before the batsman, it is unfair as it really is difficult to judge the second bounce. Infact, if you have played the EA cricket 07 PC game. you get no-balled if the ball pitches twice in front of the popping crease... I tried it out personally..

[anpadh000]

According to the Laws of cricket, Law 24.6..the umpire shall "No ball" either (1) bounce more than twice or (2) rolls along the ground before it reaches the popping crease...So the batsman is clearly out..

[aidange2]

I reckon that it's entirely fair for a ball to not be called a no-ball in this circumstance...the treatment that the batsman will surely give a ball like this would be punishment enough...

[MrKaiten]

Given that 2 bounces is legal, why don't slower bowlers throw in the odd 2-bouncer occasionally?

[senluijr]

@MrKaiten you would have to get it exactly right, most of the change in the line and length of the ball happens when the ball bounces especially for slow bowlers, a ball that short gives the batsman a chance to move forward and take it early or let it bounce the second time, when there will be a lot less change of direction and hit the ball. Complete surprise is required to get good results from a double bouncer.

[Cranvelly]

im quite confused in this video :S

[tcsonline]

yeh im pretty sure it was out. Andre Adams bowled a double bouncer to Andy Bichel in the 2003 World Cup. He hit for six, but it was NOT called a no-Ball.

[a1193851]

Believe it or not, the umpire actually got it right. It's only a no-ball if the ball bounces MORE than twice. It's got to be the most commonly mistaken rule in cricket, but it is true.

I think I read somewhere that de Villiers knew the rule, but he was standing his ground in case the umpire didn't!

[YoungAz1]

how do u even fucknig play cricket?

[kakagroup1]

teri behan sath ho ju bara maza ata hai cricket khelnay main ;)

Ask ur sister about the translation she knows what am i talking about :D

[paulshaw76]

why you looking at this if you dont know how to play cricket dipshit

[andythehr8]

its legal guys........another instance is d 2003 world cup wen andy bichel hit a six of d ball wich bounced thrice b4 reaching him....against new zealand...

[jedicaptain41]

That's a dead ball; if the ball bounces more than once before reaching the batters crease. Therefore ab de villiers shouldn't have been out, CHEATING!

[Akerslala]

jedicaptain, clearly you are unaware of the rules of cricket dip shit. The ball is allowed to bounce twice before the batsmens crease.

[jedicaptain41]

@akerslala learn the rules of the game bitch

[tadders56]

i agree if it bounces twice or more before the batsman its a no ball. bad decision but umpires do make bad decisions sometimes you just have to let it GO

[intellofreak]

That law is so lame man. How on earth can you play a ball that bounces twice ??.. That blockhead who framed the law should have tried doing it first.. I have a mind to make that lawmaker a batsman and bounce the cricket ball on his dick..lets see what he says to that second "bounce" bloody faggots.. if there is an insane rule, change it, damn it !!

[DeanWhipper]

You insane? I would gladly let bowlers bowl me double bouncers regularly, would crack them all for 4

[intellofreak]

If all batsmen just keep cracking fours off "double bouncers", there'd not even be a single soul watching cricket...That's what you call "kid cricket" when you deliberately bowl slow double bouncers to help the kid get bat-to-ball

[nawaf14]

haha dekho konsa madarchod baat karraha hein...behenchod jab tere baap dadao ko gand mein laath marke bhaga diya tha taab wo humare paer mein ake pare or mafi manga....pakistan is just a piece of shit....were ppl fuk their own sisters make mutant children like u bastard....and its realy funny how u talk abt smell u hairy piece of shit race ....

[destinyflash1207]

If you guys don't know what you are talking about then don't comment. Its LEGAL!! Yes its a bad ball but it is legal. If you don't know the laws of cricket then don't talk. The law says no-ball if it bounces "MORE than twice"

[SuperMaester]

why people even debating the possibility of 2 bounces being legal

[whobegotyou2009]

how the fuck does a professional cricketer get the ball to bounce twice

[MrCrazy152]

wtf is up with the wicket

[billybxox]

It has to bounce once in adult cricket.Anymore and its a no-ball.

Junior cicketers u13 are allowed 2.U15's 1.

[Pinnacle94]

Nope, got it right. Two bounces is legal

[path1993]

nope allowed to bounce twice in adults cricket bounces more than twice then no ball

[Shivian123]

That's an odd one. Didn't know the rule myself but you'd be a bit red faced learning that one for the first time if you are the bowler and batter!

[Coopa12345678]

Its pretty mch a bezzare ball more than annythg

[pup218]

it is out. the ball can bounce a third time BEHIND the batsmans crease as well. that is not a no-ball.

many people who DONT KNOW THE RULES think that it should be a no-ball. you don't see many deliveries bounce twice, hence theory spreading that it is a no-ball.

[yoz1969]

Bowler should apologise to the batsman for bowling such a piece of shite and the batsman should apologise to his teammates for the shot and not knowing the laws of the game. Amateurs

[Exalt4KoRn]

This is just 1 reason of many to why challenge should be brought into cricket. Umpires get things wrong...

[xratedcheese]

They do get things wrong yes, but not on this occassion.

[bringbackdeano]

Why the complaints about India being disadvantaged, Bucknor being hopeless, etc? The law says it's a no ball if it bounces more than twice. It wasn't a no ball and AB was out. Bucknor got it perfectly right.

[juwboi]

i think its so stupid that umpires dont no wat to do if the ball bounces twice

[pubuman]

They do, and they did.. wtf?!

[juwboi]

no they didnt they gave him out, and acording to the rules if the ball bounces twice it is a no ball and cannot be given out

[pubuman]

No, the rule is if it bounces MORE than twice.. not twice... so you are the one that doesnt know the rules. It bounced twice, so its NOT a no-ball.

[billybxox]

U KNOW THE RULES?

Come off it, even the umpire in this game doesn't!

[pubuman]

Yes, I do - just look at the MCC manual, its publicly available at the ICC website...

[pubuman]

@ludocrat WRONG! The rule is that the ball has to bounce MORE than twice for it to be a no ball. So in this case it IS out... idiot!

[triplebettslord]

@ludocrat Wrong mate... Here is the rule: "The umpire at the bowler's end shall call and signal No ball if a ball which he considers to have been delivered, without having previously touched the bat or person of the striker, either (i) bounces more than twice..." The batsman was out and that is that.

[ludocrat]

@triplebettslord

Yeah, you're dead right. Whoops. I'm deleting that last comment.

[Purvansh]

@pubuman actually the rule is that if the ball has bounced more than once. If it has bounced twice before the popping crease, then it should be declared a dead ball. Obviously in this situation, it would be difficult to determine since the ball bounced right before he hit it.

[pubuman]

@Purvansh Unless the rules were changed in the last six months that is not the case. Even then this was more than six months ago, so the rules that were applied were correct. You are mistaken, the ball has to bounce more than twice, check the MCC rule book (law 24 sec 6).

[villafan001]

@pubuman The rule was indeed altered in October, and it is now a no-ball if the ball pithces more than once.

[villafan001]

@pubuman The rule was indeed altered in October, and it is now a no-ball if the ball bounces more than once.

[sachinsinha]

@villafan001 No it hasn't changed, these are the rules.

The umpire shall call and signal No ball if a ball which he considers to have been delivered,

without having previously touched bat or person of the striker,

either (i) bounces more than twice

or (ii) rolls along the ground

before it reaches the popping crease.

[villafan001]

@sachinsinha I do apologise - what I suggested only applies to matches in England (played under the guise of ECB) - for some reason when ECB sent us umpires the 2010 law changes they amalgamated this own change to English 'playing regulations' to the various MCC law changes.

[wightyellow1]

@pubuman it is now.

[HardyzGuy25]

bloody hell! it should be a no-ball if it bounces twice anyway!!!!!!!

[CollingwoodLakersAB]

Was he given out ? omfg bucknor is afucking moron fukin idiot. Shood be fired.

[yrp17th]

alright people, here's what is stated based on MCC's laws: Law 24.6 - Ball bouncing more than twice or rolling along the ground; The umpire at the bowler's end shall call and signal No Ball if a ball which he considers to have been delivered, without having previously touched the bat or person(any equipment of the batsman) of the striker EITHER bounces more than TWICE or rolls along the ground before it reaches the popping crease. Bucknor was spot on that time...

[BeLegit69]

wait i dont get it...why was it out?

lol Ash !

[tomlister]

hey look, S.A were doing jst as bad as NZ in bangladesh! apart from the fact that S.A are good and we are terrible

[stealthpakfa]

fucking aussie cheats! aussies are born to cheat!

[aussiestuff]

And Pakistani's are the shittest drug cheating cricketers in the world

[stealthpakfa]

sorry buddy i have absolutely nothing related to pakistan! im just ur average citizen of planet earth just think aussies are born cheats! just my opinion, its nothing to be ashamed of mate, aussies do win alot through cheating,thus aussies do win alot! but im sure any aussie would be proud to cheat and win and be known as winners!

[aussiestuff]

which match did we win by cheating? and how did we cheat?

[stealthpakfa]

that sydney test against india 2008! it was a disgrace to the sport of cricket,it was not just a one off,it was constant cheating for 5 days in a row! thats the day when it showed the true cheating colours of australian sport! i mean i dont like india but that match was repulsive! it made a mockery of professional sport! ponting should have been assassinated like bob woolmer!

[aussiestuff]

how did we cheat?

[losers638]

talk about umpiring decisions

[aussiestuff]

not our fault the umpire made 1 retarted decision.

[losers638]

when benson asked ponting about the catch he told thatclarke had taken it.see the replays.i bet aussies bribed the umpires in that match.

[wizzie76]

Its wankers like you that give the rest of society a bad name. I fail to see how you can say we cheat when each match has 2 neutral umpires, they are human & will always make errors but I cant see how you can say we cheated because of a few umpiring decisions, Im yet to see an Paki walk when he's been given not out.

[losers638]

why were all the decisons against india?

[davenavarroforpm]

sorry when did we cheat?

[Shivian123]

"ponting should have been assassinated like bob woolmer!"

Hmmm I wonder who the idiot is here?

And name an incident where we cheated in that test? And don't say so-and-so didn't walk when he edged because there is no team on the planet that can claim the moral high-ground there.

[sukmydikashol]

y was it a legal? where is the poping crease??

[kh4l3k]

we badly need someone like rafique...

[omiovalentino]

wow...!! wen i was a kid i got good players in my neighborhood out like tha!...freakin ~!#$#@%~# always called it not out cuz its a noballl.....whre waz buknor thennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn> WHEREEEEEEEEEEEEEE>>>>

[sammymotes]

its actually out gimp features!

[Lordrutledge]

From an Aussie c'mon Bangladesh pull of the upset i'll be supporting them against the South Africans

[PopePouri]

Not quite...

[abarnwal]

I am not surprised by this decision. Of course if Mr. Bucknor is there we can even see more strange decisions in the near future...It's time for Bucknor to retire..seems he did not learn any lesson what India taught him in Australia

[TomahawkMissile]

It was a correct decission

[CurryMuncher1]

I think gpian was being sarcastic there but it would be pretty crazy if some1 could develop an awesome two bounce delivery that span both ways or something. anyone else agree?

[gpian]

lol.... ya got mah point ;-)

rest chilll out guys! i was jusss saying datz how English media will incorporate this issue!

[mainlove8]

Thats perfectly legal ON the field stuff PROVEN by laws.

.....Unlike the other team whos ex-captain was PROVEN to be involved in dangerously illegal stuff OFF the field.(remember match fixing anyone?)

Anyways, thats nothing compared to what australia, india or pakistan have done in the past so....shut the fuck up please "CHEATERS"

[sarwig]

No one was complaining where they? de Villers didn't make a big issue of it. (something I'm sure most Aussie players would have made an issue of). What's the point of binging up something that happened years go?

[KalahariSurf]

remember match fixing? Why not mention illegal wars then, or all the drug scandals in american sports. Stick to the point at hand, or get a life

[mainlove8]

Thats perfectly legal ON the field stuff PROVEN by laws.

.....Unlike the other team whos ex-captain was PROVEN to be involved in dangerously illegal stuff OFF the field.(remember match fixing anyone?)

Anyways, thats nothing compared to what australia, india or pakistan have done in the past so....shut the fuck up please "CHEATERS"

[hNasty77]

yo gpian stfu u faggot...its out according to cricket laws...shut it down

[CricVoice]

Rigent is right!

"Law 24, Section 6 states: The umpire shall call a no-ball if it bounces more than twice before reaching the popping crease."

So de Villiers was out.

[gpian]

thats the only way bangali can get them out CHEATERS!

[hNasty77]

yo gpian its out according to cricket laws....shut it down...u faggot

[adnanrulz]

fuk u asshole...thats out according to cricket laws....we don do match fixing like the SA faggots....

[mukith100]

do u know anything about cricket? u racist i bet ur a indian

[shamoni8]

do u know anythin about races & racism?

[mukith100]

dehhh? look what "gpian" is saying "thats the only way bangali can get them out CHEATERS" allthough he knows that was a legal decission made by de umpires still how his making racist comments.......do u still think his not a racist?

[shamoni8]

obviously he's not. bein a racist is bias on teh basis of colour, not nationality. that's a nationalist.

[mukith100]

!!!wotever!!! dnt make it long, dou think he made a good comment? cummon now dont lie u know de ans.

[shamoni8]

i might not b a favourable comment or a comment that everyone likes, but it definitely was not a racist comment is all my point is. :)

[mukith100]

i got ur point and thats what i'm trying to say, mybe i said it other way round.

anyway just think, if any of the player frm his own country got a batsman out similar like the one ashraful gets what will happen? what will he say then?i'm sure 100% his gonna try to diffend his team.

BTw. to all the banglsdesh haters, i swear give us a 2 or 3 years time and will show u what we are capable of?

case intervals will be open after 3 years time

[shamoni8]

case intervals?

& i assume ur talkin bout cricket here? if so, then u've been gettin ur chance since 2000 now.

[mukith100]

ur indian? if so then u must know after how many years it tooks india to get a test win (after 23 years or so).hahaha sounds funnny isnt it?

i'll say,bangladesh still a new team and all de players developing dem selves day by day.

bangladesh was a dangerous one day side but since de world cup (2007) dey complitely lost der self confidence and this is de reason why dey are not performing.once they dey get that confidence back they will perform better in every series.

[shamoni8]

23 years, but that was a different day. the number of matches itself will give u an idea.

plus, dont forget, the game was new. we were mostly travellin to far off places we'd never seen or been to, hardly any coaches or tv benefits.

2ndly, if ur a bangladeshi, u sure have balls to laugh at indian cricket, considerin how u owe your existence to us

3rdly, bangladesh was never a dangerous ODI side. they were always lucky with one off wins, which was shown by the indian series after da worldcup :)

[mamuofcricket]

correct!!

[Rigent]

This is out, according to cricket laws.

A ball has to bounce more than twice to be called a no or dead ball. Check the laws.