That is Ringo's voice! Interesting.. So he's trying to spill the truth. If John, George and Ringo were in India when Paul died, and John buried Paul.. That means Paul, the real Paul had to have been with him in India. So did something happen in India? Isn't that when Yoko came into the picture? That's also when Faul came into the picture around the same time.
The name iamaphoney is a reference to what Charles Manson said in an interview "I am not a phoney, i'm a real person" - iamaphoney coined his name from this... if you watch his documentary 'The Winged Beetle' you will hear the quote yourself.
I must applaud the cryptic content of iamaphoney, I don't think any opinion of the information presented and I am intrigued of what is about to come regardless; for the idea of 'conspiracy theory' itself does not exist.
@JGuildersleeve If I had a penny for every time you've contradicted yourself during this debate, I'd be a billionaire. LOL. What else can you do? Know any tricks? You certainly manage to brighten up my day, LOL!
@NightSurfer47 Then name one example where I have contradicted myself. Just one. Should be easy since you are claiming that are a hundred billion to choose from.
@JGuildersleeve "Do you have a single shred of evidence whatsoever that contradicts what they say their duties are?". Please, don't say anymore. I'm dying of laughter. You are a goldmine. LOL.
@JGuildersleeve And I have never said your claims were incorrect. The only claims you've made is that I am a predictable tool because I support Ron Paul and think Paul McCartney is dead. Everything you've said in this conversation is either hypocritical or ridiculous, such as your views on economics. You are an idiot, sir.
@NightSurfer47 Well, again, if you could provide any evidence that has undermined what I said, I'd like to see it. I'm afraid I remain unconvinced at you throwing a childish tantrum and pretending like that counts as a valid response to my claims.
@JGuildersleeve You call me a puppet being controlled by masters, yet you believe everything the Federal Reserve tells you. You are a hypocrite who has no respect for another person's point of view. I
@NightSurfer47 Believe everything the Federal Reserve tells me? Since when does an abstract body tell anyone anything? I was quoting their mission statement. Do you have a single shred of evidence whatsoever that contradicts what they say their duties are? Or, are you just going to play a rhetorical trick like the charlatan you are, say that "they're lying" without proving why, and then leave it at that, as if that actually constitutes a valid counter-argument?
@JGuildersleeve "You started off by saying that" And it still holds true. You are very sad, cynical, uninformed individual and it is hard to have a conversation with you, let alone a debate. I am sorry.
@NightSurfer47 At this point? You started off by saying that. You have done nothing but take personal shots, and at best, suggest that my claims are incorrect yet you neglect to ever provide a shred of evidence that reinforces that point.
"I said you were part of an "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk."
And if Alex Jones didn't exist, you would have no reason to bring up Ron Paul. By doing so, you are not only suggesting that I am a follower of Alex Jones,a well known conspiracy theorist, and as we have already established, you believe I am a hardcore conspiracy theorist, you are saying everyone who supports Ron Paul is a conspiracy theorist. While many are, I am not, so this entire argument is irrelevant.
@NightSurfer47 This is full of so many lies it will be impossible to unpack them all. Safe to say, anyone reading the posts can say that all the views NightSurfer just pinned to me are flat out false. All I said was that his position on the Federal Reserve was the same position taken by the "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk of conspiracy theorists. That is exactly what I said, and it was exactly true. Predictably, NightRider belongs to that ilk. Everything else is just smoke being blown.
@JGuildersleeve "All I said was that his position on the Federal Reserve was the same position taken by the "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk of conspiracy theorists." And as I have already established, I am not a conspiracy theorist or follower of Alex Jones, so all that leaves is that Ron Paul and I share the same views on economics and the Federal Reverse, and, like I've already said, makes this entire argument irrelevant.
@NightSurfer47 OK, you have serious comprehension issues. My point is that there is a particular ilk of conspiracy theorist who, among other things, happen to be slavish devotees to the kind of strict constitutionalist system espoused by people like Alex Jones and Ron Paul. The fact that you don't follow Alex Jones has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm saying whatsoever. I'm saying you parrot political talking points that you can find espoused by figures like Jones and Paul.
@JGuildersleeve " My point is that there is a particular ilk of conspiracy theorist who, among other things, happen to be slavish devotees to the kind of strict constitutionalist system espoused by people like Alex Jones and Ron Paul."
And I have already denied that I am apart of that particular ilk of conspiracy theorists, so why do you continue to bring this up?
@NightSurfer47 You can deny it all you want to. You are here, you have admitted to following conspiracy theory ideas, and you have admitted to supporting the points of Ron Paul. Based on everything you have said, you are exactly part of this ilk. It's not like you get a badge as proof or anything - your actions are what make you what you are. Like I said, the shoe fits.
"I am familiar with the Austrian school - certainly familiar enough with it to know that it has nothing to do with the way the Federal Reserve operates."
And yet, the Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have?
@NightSurfer47 "And yet, the Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have?" I've already corrected you on this once. Second, the Austrian School mostly developed an economics that is predominantly laissez-faire. The American version of capitalism has nothing to do with laissez-faire free market capitalism.
"I don't think any serious economist has suggested that the outcomes of such a system look very hopeful."
Let me give you some friendly advice. DO NOT debate economics with someone until you are ABSOLUTELY SURE you know what you are talking about, otherwise we get comments like these that are embarrassing to read. Just for future reference.
@NightSurfer47 Sorry, it's difficult to keep up with your posts that are flagged. Again, though, you have done nothing here except claim that I don't know what I am talking about yet provide no more than zero evidence to reinforce your claims.
@JGuildersleeve Capitalism? Seriously? You should be worried more about the Federal Reserve than you are of capitalism in general. But I get it, it's hip to be an anarchist these days.
@NightSurfer47 Well, the Federal Reserve as it exists now is a consequence of the capitalist system we have. Sorry but I find that there may be problems that exist that are wider than the ones that are experienced within the United States. I suppose it was also hip to be an anarchist in the days of Bakunin, Kropotkin, Rocker, Rosenburg, etc. But thanks for the petty attempt to devalue a longstanding philosophical tradition, you phony.
@JGuildersleeve The Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have? That's ridiculous. I suppose that since the Titanic sank we should just get rid of ocean liners complete, should we not?
@NightSurfer47 "The Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have? That's ridiculous." I suggest you look back because I never said that.
@JGuildersleeve Oh I'm sorry, you said " the Federal Reserve as it exists now is a consequence of the capitalist system we have"
Still just as ridiculous and unfounded. Something tells me you like the concept of anarchy so much you're willing to dismiss any other option and use examples like that to make your point.
@NightSurfer47 "Still just as ridiculous and unfounded." No, it's exactly true, which you'd know if you understood reality. One of the central functions of the Federal Reserve now is to maintain the stability of the financial system. In other words, it only works to preserve the capitalist system in the United States. This is a fact. So what I said was exactly true.
@JGuildersleeve "No, it's exactly true, which you'd know if you understood reality." Oh, I forgot. You already have it all figured it out.
"it only works to preserve the capitalist system in the United States. This is a fact."
You are obviously not familiar with the Austrian school of economics or the concept of a free market economy at all otherwise you wouldn't be making such a ridiculous claim. You are hilarious.
@NightSurfer47 I am familiar with the Austrian school - certainly familiar enough with it to know that it has nothing to do with the way the Federal Reserve operates. Furthermore, there isn't a single free market economy in the world right now, and that might be a good thing. I don't think any serious economist has suggested that the outcomes of such a system look very hopeful.
@NightSurfer47 "I suppose that since the Titanic sank we should just get rid of ocean liners complete, should we not?" I never said we should get rid of capitalism because of the Federal Reserve, did I? We should get rid of capitalism because it is a barbaric, inhumane system that functions only to exploit a large majority in order to profit a slim minority. It is just about the most illogical, unworkable system imaginable.
@JGuildersleeve But you don't live under Capitalism, you live under Globalism. Globalism is against free market Capitalism. Globalists are Monopoly Men. Fortune 100 pay next to no tax, and are too big to fail because they have power over governments. Globalism uses the media to get the phoney left to blame Capitalism for its own crimes.
@NightSurfer47 I know what you mean. That's the revelation I'm talking about. It was supposed to revealed years ago. There is no revelation. It turned into 2012 at some point along the way - but that was never mentioned when Iamaphoney claimed to have this sacred information four years ago. I suppose if he did, everybody would have burst out laughing.
I mean, would you really take anyone seriously who said, "I have evidence that will completely change the world. It's incredibly significant and important. And I will tell you...in five years. First, enjoy my awesome editing techniques set to my own music which somehow manage to accomplish despite being burdened with this knowledge." Give me a break.
@JGuildersleeve I agree with *almost* everything you are saying, but I'd still give IAAP a chance to explain himself before I dismiss him quickly. Until then, you and I can only speculate. I, unlike you, will make my final judgement once this is all over. But so far, I've gotten nicely edited videos with great music attached, and one out of three documentaries that I greatly enjoyed, truthful or not. Sue me.
@NightSurfer47 Let's put it this way - if we are to suspend our rationality and pretend like IAAP does have important information then he's committing a worse crime and should be thrown in jail for withholding evidence in a major criminal case. I am giving him the benefit of the doubt by suggesting that he's merely a manipulative hack who is unfortunately convincing a lot of vulnerable people with his fraudulent videos.
@JGuildersleeve And again, don't assume that because I believe in a little conspiracy theory that I am just a puppet and am unaware of the much more important issues that face me everyday. That's a big assumption to make yet you like to make it a lot when talking to different people.
@NightSurfer47 Well, then, why do you keep giving me all the standard conspiracy theory talking points? Federal Reserve? That's right out of the Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul ilk. I'd be happy to give you the benefit of the doubt if you conveyed a single independent thought.
@NightSurfer47 "So because I agree with Ron Paul's positions, I am incapable of a single independent thought?" What you're incapable of is actually understanding the simplest of statements, since I never suggested that. What I'm saying is that conspiracy theorists are so slavish that they typically hold the same views. How do you think I guessed correctly that you supported Ron Paul? You think that was just dumb luck? No, it's because you're part of a group of very predictable people.
@JGuildersleeve I don't see how being a supporter of Ron Paul and also being interested in the PID phenomenon puts me in a group of "very predictable people" but whatever. I guess I'll add that to the list of ridiculous statements you've already made and leave it at that.
@NightSurfer47 Are you out of your mind? I legitimately accurately predicted that you supported Ron Paul. In that case, it makes absolutely no sense for you to conclude that it's a ridiculous statement since I outright proved my point. I'm sorry that you don't like being called predictable - nobody would - but the shoe fits in this case, by your own admission.
@JGuildersleeve "I legitimately accurately predicted that you supported Ron Paul." The only reason being you thought I also was a follower of Alex Jones, also a known conspiracy theorist. I can understand why you'd make that connection, but no, I am not a supporter of Ron Paul because Alex Jones tells me to be. Which is the assumption you originally made. Talk about being a hypocrite.
@NightSurfer47 "am not a supporter of Ron Paul because Alex Jones tells me to be. Which is the assumption you originally made." You should be ashamed for lying about what I said. I didn't say that in the slightest. I said you were part of an "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk. That you derived a scarecrow argument from that in order to try and squirm your way out of the fact that I accurately predicted how predictable you are is telling of the lengths you'll go to. It's shameful.
@JGuildersleeve And please tell me, what have you contributed to iamaphoney's comments besides your elitist attitude, hostility towards other users, and your pseudo-intellectual views on economics? I would call you a troll, but no sane human being could go on this long for just a quick laugh. Instead, your actions remind me of someone who is dying for attention by going against the herd and categorizing everything in sight. It's quite sad really.
@NightSurfer47 Again you are in no position to call anyone an elitist when it it you who have made claims to superior knowledge, not me. Why don't you look in the mirror, you hypocrite, before you begin hurling names in lieu of having anything of substance to say. Calling someone out for supporting a fraudulent hack who does nothing but willfully misinform suckers is not an example of elitism in the slightest. Claiming to have the smarts to be able to see things that others can't, however, is.
@JGuildersleeve Do I need to quote myself? I said I felt sorry for you because you couldn't see past the Paul is Dead theory and understand what these videos really mean. Never once did I deny you any evidence of this or the possibility of a friendly debate. Does that mean I made claims to superior knowledge? Maybe somewhat, but you are blowing all of this out of proportion and I am simply defending myself from this unwarranted hostility.
@NightSurfer47 "Maybe somewhat"? How about exactly. Suggesting that I can't understand the video and you can is precisely a claim to superior knowledge, which is, in fact, a textbook definition of elitism. You are lumping yourself in with a special group of people who can "see the truth" - a classic conspiracy theory rhetorical trick.
@JGuildersleeve But I never once claimed that I knew what these videos were about, did I? I was simply responding to your comments that kept bringing up Paul is Dead, and tried telling you that there was much more to them then that and I felt sorry for you that you couldn't realize that. I have no idea what the hell IAAP is doing, but I know there's a deeper meaning that you choose to ignore.
@NightSurfer47 "But I never once claimed that I knew what these videos were about, did I?" You claimed you knew more than I did and you still do claim that you "know there's a deeper meaning" here. Again, pure unadulterated elitism or arrogance. "I was simply responding to your comments that kept bringing up Paul is Dead" - Then you must have been talking to an illusion since I didn't keep "bringing up Paul is Dead".
@JGuildersleeve "You claimed you knew more than I did and you still do claim that you "know there's a deeper meaning" here. Again, pure unadulterated elitism or arrogance." Sure, but is that something to get that upset about? I mean, Jesus, nothing called for the amount of slander that you or I had to deal with. You seem to get very upset when somebody believes in a conspiracy theory and is aware of something you aren't, and tries to inform you.
@NightSurfer47 Again, you can respond like this all day long for all I care. If you have anything of substance to say, you would say it, rather than resort to cheap personal shots as you repeatedly do. I could care less - please continue doing it, it only serves to delegitimate your points further to anyone else who views this and proves without much doubt that you really have no response.
@NightSurfer47 Erm, what exactly are the personal shots that I have taken? Secondly, I am not calling out for companionship. Once again, you are misreading what I've written.
"hostility towards other users" - Total irrationality, apologizing for fraudulence, and slavish devotion to a distraction industry deserves to be met with hostility. "pseudo-intellectual views on economics" - Uh-huh. I'm the one who is straining to draw a connection between the Austrian School of economics and the current US system being protected by the Federal Reserve?
@JGuildersleeve "slavish devotion to a distraction industry" Hilarious, and it is MY comments that are full of "so many lies", talk about hypocritical.
" I'm the one who is straining to draw a connection between the Austrian School of economics and the current US system being protected by the Federal Reserve?"
I am drawing a well known connection between the Austrian school of economics and the US system that existed BEFORE the federal reserve, which you are seemingly unaware of.
@NightSurfer47 No, I am aware that the Austrian school of economics had somewhat of an influence on the US system (though capitalism in the US was NEVER laissez-faire). Unfortunately for you, what that has to do with my claim about how the Federal Reserve works to protect the current capitalist structure in the US amounts to exactly diddly. So what are you saying, that all this talk about the Austrian school has been a worthless diversion because you still haven't figured out what I meant?
@JGuildersleeve Because the Federal Reserve does NOTHING to protect the current capitalist structure, quite the opposite really. I could debate this with you all day, and I'd like to, but this is all irrelevant and has nothing to do with iamaphoney. And the only reason we are debating this is because you brought up the fact that you were much more wise than fans of iamaphoney because you knew about the real issues, once again a subconscious need for attention that is plainly visible. Sad.
@NightSurfer47 "Because the Federal Reserve does NOTHING to protect the current capitalist structure" - According to the mission statement on the Federal Reserve website, one of their central duties is to maintain "the stability of the financial system". So, yes, outside of your fantasy world, they do precisely that.
@JGuildersleeve Well, I suppose we'll have to wait until TheRevelAtion. I suppose it's just as likely this is a bunch of musicians from Denmark trying to sell an album, but what if...
@JGuildersleeve You are absolutely right,none of them are convincing in the slightest. But they are images that have been used before and are very well known in the occult community, which leads me to believe there's more to these videos than just Paul is Dead.
@NightSurfer47 Of course, the people making these videos want you to think that. The conversations about these videos have been about things like Tavistock, Crowley, shape shifting, aliens, three years ago. There's nothing of merit to those discussions though and the fact that these videos contain references to them doesn't do anything in their favor, as far as I'm concerned.
@JGuildersleeve "Unfortunately, you are only a mouth piece for someone else's con job" Excuse me? Have I offended you someway to provoke that kind of behavior. What an asshole you are.
@NightSurfer47 Um, this was a response to you telling me that I was incapable of understanding the video. In other words, you are saying that people who disagree with the conclusions of the video are not as smart as you. That is, bar none, the most nauseating arrogant position you can take and you only added to it with condescension by saying you feel sorry for me. Sorry that you can't accept a fraction of the inapproriate remarks that you shovelled in my direction, you hypocrite.
@NightSurfer47 But like I said, it's not really you speaking. I've seen that response so many times now, it's quite clear that it's simply the standard line manufactured by your masters to cover up the fact that you have really nothing to say in support of the fraudulent videos that you are buying into.
@JGuildersleeve OK, since you already know so much about me and have your mind set on what my beliefs are, there's no point in responding to you. I don't know why I deserved such hostility from you nor do I think I offended you in anyway. If so, I apologize and hope to end this here. If you want to debate these videos, by all means do, but spare us of your elitist attitude next time.
@NightSurfer47 You are in no position to call anyone an elitist when it it you who have made claims to superior knowledge, not me. Why don't you look in the mirror, you hypocrite, before you begin hurling names in lieu of having anything of substance to say. Calling someone out for supporting a fraudulent hack who does nothing but willfully misinform suckers is not an example of elitism in the slightest. Claiming to have the smarts to be able to see things that others can't, however, is.
@silentyp3 I care. I think any decent human being would care when a person was taking advantage of vulnerable people and deceiving them with their manufactured lies.
@JGuildersleeve That's cool, but why PID? I think there's a lot more serious fucked up frauds than pid, like ughhh the Government, The President??? There are plenty other more that could most likely effect our lives in the future. Anyway what do you think the revalation will be? Probably some gay ass video of a guy singing backwards...whoooo haha.
@silentyp3 Erm, well, I don't think making vague remarks about "the Government" and "The President" are all that valuable. In fact, the government and the President are much less problematic than the corporate structure that pretty much shapes the way governments (specific ones - not some vague "Government", I mean, could you possibly be more Western-centric?) act.
@silentyp3 But I concentrate my efforts much more on more important things like corporatization, capitalism, etc. Incidentally, there is no revelation. This is like every conspiracy theory which can only function because they string people along.
@silentyp3 Well most everything won't matter "one day" right? I have no interest in PID or the occult references but the whole series, especially the music, is very intriguing. I love it.
@JGuildersleeve And it is you who seem so confident in their positions, that this is all a giant prank, and incapable of hearing another's point of view.
@NightSurfer47 Erm, what point of view? I have debated this issue thoroughly for years. I am well aware of many points of view on this subject. You're right that I don't have any tolerance for irrationality nor do I support intellectual fraudulence, which is what this is, nor should I agree with your support of it. That's perfectly legitimate.
@JGUildersleeve When did I ever once claim to have superior knowledge or deny you any evidence? I am always prepared to have a friendly debate and share with others what I've discovered, but your elitist attitude is really pissing me off do I'm second guessing myself.
@NightSurfer47 When did you claim superior knowledge? Quite clearly - when you said that there is "so much in this video" that I don't understand that you evidently do. That is exactly claiming to have superior knowledge - or are you now going back on that claim? And I don't believe you are prepared to have a friendly discussion. You are showing the usual traits of the person who is only willing to have a friendly discussion with those who don't deviate from the conpsiracy party line.
@JGuildersleeve I feel sorry for you man, there's so much in this video that you're failing to see or understand. Please look beyond Paul is Dead. Iamaphoney probably doesn't even believe he's dead. This is all a red herring. LOOK CLOSER.
@NightSurfer47 Ah, yes, the old conspiracy theory chestnut about being able to see things that the rest of us can't. You'll notice of course that no one who actually has evidence and is confident in their claims ever has to resort to this petty, amateurish, pseuointellectual rhetorical posturing in order to cover up the fact that they are actually incapable of presenting evidence or retorting in any serious way. Forgive me if I remain unconvinced by your own claims to superior knowledge.
@NightSurfer47 You might as well, want to craft a response of your own rather than xeroxing the slavish standard non-response that the conspiracy theory masters have constructed for you. Unfortunately, you are only a mouth piece for someone else's con job.
@NightSurfer47 You're right - it is Ringo's voice from an interview where he is saying that the rumours are a load of crap. So, yeah, it's Ringo's voice but totally ripped from their context (including deleting key parts of his speech). He makes it seem as if Ringo is suggesting that The Beatles put the clues in when he is saying the opposite, when his words aren't being rearranged by a con man. This isn't surprising because Iamaphoney is a charlatan perpetrating a fraud.
@NightSurfer47 And as long as we're playing "when will you realize", I can ask when you will realize that you are being conned by a distraction industry?
@msg2urudy Good call! Furthermore, that's not even Ringo's voice! So maybe Ringo was replaced too! But we certainly can't jump to the conclusion that this is just another in a series of willful manipulations carried out by a team promising to reveal the truth on an alleged major scandal and criminal case for going on four years now. No, it makes more sense to believe in another chase-your-own-tail conspiracy theory, right?
@JGuildersleeve Dude what's wrong with you? Let people believe what they want, everyone has an opinion, I've seen you on a lot of pid videos and all you ever do is argue on them with people that believe the conspiracy, let them, is it really effecting your life that much, like seriously is it keeping you from sleeping at night?
@silentyp3 You are really missing some crucial nuances here. What makes you think I'm stopping people from believing what they want to believe? Or do you mean that Iamaphoney should monopolize the information that people should be getting and anyone who happens to question the videos constitutes some kind of serious violation. The fact is Iamaphoney is willfully manipulating the facts and in doing so is giving people inaccurate information. It is necessary to point out fraud where it exists.
@JGuildersleeve Like I said, look past the Paul is Dead theory when watching these videos. Pay attention to the subliminal messages or the recurring ring of fire. Pay attention to the "superstone" phoney mentions from time to time. Look into these things. Phoney isn't the first.
@NightSurfer47 I know. Conpiracy theory is a major industry that function to distract people from serious issues. This is why ultimately governments are in favor of them - they keep people anesthetized. Like I said, I've been watching these videos and conversing with the community for three years now. I've heard many of the so-called "deeper" message that these videos supposedly have. None of them are convincing in the slightest.
@silentyp3 Um, it would certainly help more than one person (or group of people) having the monopoly of information and use it to actively work at misinforming people. If you want to remain consistent in your views (and I mean yours specifically) then either both Iamaphoney and U should have a right to express their points, or neither of us should. But don't tell me that I am preventing people from believing what they want to believe - especially when you are not doing it to the fraud.
yes I'd like to take something from this. It intriques me, not just the myster of whether PID or not, but everything else. What exactly were the Beatles trying to get across in their music and since only about 100 people know what they truly were singing about, how did they come by that knowledge? Were they members of the occult? Elite? Or something else?
@iamaphuney There is no singing backwards here. What it is is a melody and lyric that sort of makes sense (and adheres to the IAAP format) played forward but becomes Free As A Bird when reversed. I have no idea what you're daring me to do and what you mean regarding "production values".
These videos have been going on for years now – I am now convinced that 'iamaphoney' is just some student film maker having a laugh at people. Anyone with *real* information would have put it out to the world years ago. Not released cryptic student art videos for years!
@DJSpymo The audio is from a radio show called "Ringo's Yellow Submarine" and can be listened to in full on youtube. Here's the episode used in this video, if I'm not mistaken:
/watch?v=xQ33Ye82AuI
I'm pretty sure the real Ringo did that whole show. You be the judge, lol.
@DJSpymo "Student film maker" you think? I don't think so. The amount of time, money and hard work spent making these videos is way beyond somebody doing it for "a laugh" (especially with the low view ratings).
Take IAAP's music alone. There's no way that was recorded, arranged and performed by amateurs. I mean "Shoes" is as good as anything Paul has released in recent years. I have no idea what it all means but it surely can't be a publicity stunt (as it has been going on for 4 years).
@lonedrone Erm, the very fact that he's using this alleged (falsely, I should add) criminal case to broadcast his own music seems to suggest that it is precisely a publicity stunt, no? Yes, it has backfired, because it's so overtly fraudulent that only the most vulernable devotees to conspiracy theory have been on board and even they have fallen off when the original claims to knowing the full truth have gone unfulfilled after four years or so.
Question.... why should we care about all of these songs the band "Revolver" sings? That's the band who sings these songs, right? What is their significance?
Here you go folks, listen to the song in reverse audioboo.fm/boos/390439-song-reversal-of-iiix-mmxi-getting-closer (and grab a lyric sheet to read along with)
Wow. Nice job. I hear what you did. (Secret - play this song backwards and it's the exactly melody line to "Free as a Bird." Clever clever clever. I'm going to see if I hear any actual vocal reversals but I just wanted to let you know.... I know. :-)
in all fairness we have been strung along in the last two years by a couple of dutch guys who are sick of playing golden earrings only hit so they though they might have some fun with us stupid idiots by dragging it out there are no more clues this all about some band trying to promote their up and coming album
@RockXLight look i have been watching these vids from the start if you actually read what i typed you would understand what i meant mr cynic for the last two years they have been stringing us along cos there are no more clues get it ......get over it the barrel is dry and faul will never ever admit to what has happened end of move on
@RockXLight "Try four" hahaha. It's sad - I remember people truly believing three years ago that the truth was right around the corner. It's amazing not only that people were played for suckers with such obvious fabrications but that some people from that time STILL remain to defend this shlock.
brilliant!!! x
KatMPhotography 3 months ago
That is Ringo's voice! Interesting.. So he's trying to spill the truth. If John, George and Ringo were in India when Paul died, and John buried Paul.. That means Paul, the real Paul had to have been with him in India. So did something happen in India? Isn't that when Yoko came into the picture? That's also when Faul came into the picture around the same time.
SilenceDoGood25 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a clue for you all.
The name iamaphoney is a reference to what Charles Manson said in an interview "I am not a phoney, i'm a real person" - iamaphoney coined his name from this... if you watch his documentary 'The Winged Beetle' you will hear the quote yourself.
Insightfulprojection 4 months ago
i really dont get what all of this soundtrack stuff has to do with paul being dead. i just wanna know what was in mal evans breifcase!
beatlesfan464 5 months ago
@beatlesfan464 There is no briefcase...sorry.
silentyp3 5 months ago
No question about it... that IS Ringo's voice...
IBiteThings 6 months ago 2
this guy is either a troll or has some real problems with his mentality
turtlliwdnifuoyehthr 6 months ago
anybody know what the ringo starr quotes at the start of this video are from ?
CK2890 6 months ago
abnasir motors is from mozambique so why are they out there??? thats the reg no @3.19
M374EVL 7 months ago
FREE AS A BIRD NEW RELEASE FROM YOU????? GREAT WORK!!!!!! I PLAY THE DRUMS, I'M INTERESTED IN YOUR MUSIC... SE YA!!!
monodrack 7 months ago
It's a lasting tribute to John Lennon's genius that his melodies sound just as brilliant and fresh backwards as they do forwards.
Backlap 7 months ago
Comment removed
nicosmith23 7 months ago
paul is dead - the rotten apple 1
TrashScores 7 months ago
I must applaud the cryptic content of iamaphoney, I don't think any opinion of the information presented and I am intrigued of what is about to come regardless; for the idea of 'conspiracy theory' itself does not exist.
SlimeAmTheBest 7 months ago
The clues are over :\ I guess, all we can do is wait and see if something will show up, but I think it's very hard !
kelvinz0r 7 months ago
@JGuildersleeve If I had a penny for every time you've contradicted yourself during this debate, I'd be a billionaire. LOL. What else can you do? Know any tricks? You certainly manage to brighten up my day, LOL!
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Then name one example where I have contradicted myself. Just one. Should be easy since you are claiming that are a hundred billion to choose from.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "Do you have a single shred of evidence whatsoever that contradicts what they say their duties are?". Please, don't say anymore. I'm dying of laughter. You are a goldmine. LOL.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 In other words, no, you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have to resort to making such a big, splashy show of ridicule.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@dogsawi Thanks for more nonsense.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve And I have never said your claims were incorrect. The only claims you've made is that I am a predictable tool because I support Ron Paul and think Paul McCartney is dead. Everything you've said in this conversation is either hypocritical or ridiculous, such as your views on economics. You are an idiot, sir.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Well, again, if you could provide any evidence that has undermined what I said, I'd like to see it. I'm afraid I remain unconvinced at you throwing a childish tantrum and pretending like that counts as a valid response to my claims.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve You call me a puppet being controlled by masters, yet you believe everything the Federal Reserve tells you. You are a hypocrite who has no respect for another person's point of view. I
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Believe everything the Federal Reserve tells me? Since when does an abstract body tell anyone anything? I was quoting their mission statement. Do you have a single shred of evidence whatsoever that contradicts what they say their duties are? Or, are you just going to play a rhetorical trick like the charlatan you are, say that "they're lying" without proving why, and then leave it at that, as if that actually constitutes a valid counter-argument?
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "You started off by saying that" And it still holds true. You are very sad, cynical, uninformed individual and it is hard to have a conversation with you, let alone a debate. I am sorry.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just feel sorry for you at this point. Goodbye.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 At this point? You started off by saying that. You have done nothing but take personal shots, and at best, suggest that my claims are incorrect yet you neglect to ever provide a shred of evidence that reinforces that point.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
Lmao. It really is sad that you two are still arguing on this video, yall need to get out more, just saying.
silentyp3 8 months ago
Reverse the Song and It's "Free As A Bird" for the most part. Pretty cool!!
skyprop 8 months ago
"I said you were part of an "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk."
And if Alex Jones didn't exist, you would have no reason to bring up Ron Paul. By doing so, you are not only suggesting that I am a follower of Alex Jones,a well known conspiracy theorist, and as we have already established, you believe I am a hardcore conspiracy theorist, you are saying everyone who supports Ron Paul is a conspiracy theorist. While many are, I am not, so this entire argument is irrelevant.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 This is full of so many lies it will be impossible to unpack them all. Safe to say, anyone reading the posts can say that all the views NightSurfer just pinned to me are flat out false. All I said was that his position on the Federal Reserve was the same position taken by the "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk of conspiracy theorists. That is exactly what I said, and it was exactly true. Predictably, NightRider belongs to that ilk. Everything else is just smoke being blown.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "All I said was that his position on the Federal Reserve was the same position taken by the "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk of conspiracy theorists." And as I have already established, I am not a conspiracy theorist or follower of Alex Jones, so all that leaves is that Ron Paul and I share the same views on economics and the Federal Reverse, and, like I've already said, makes this entire argument irrelevant.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 OK, you have serious comprehension issues. My point is that there is a particular ilk of conspiracy theorist who, among other things, happen to be slavish devotees to the kind of strict constitutionalist system espoused by people like Alex Jones and Ron Paul. The fact that you don't follow Alex Jones has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm saying whatsoever. I'm saying you parrot political talking points that you can find espoused by figures like Jones and Paul.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve " My point is that there is a particular ilk of conspiracy theorist who, among other things, happen to be slavish devotees to the kind of strict constitutionalist system espoused by people like Alex Jones and Ron Paul."
And I have already denied that I am apart of that particular ilk of conspiracy theorists, so why do you continue to bring this up?
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NightSurfer47 You can deny it all you want to. You are here, you have admitted to following conspiracy theory ideas, and you have admitted to supporting the points of Ron Paul. Based on everything you have said, you are exactly part of this ilk. It's not like you get a badge as proof or anything - your actions are what make you what you are. Like I said, the shoe fits.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
"I am familiar with the Austrian school - certainly familiar enough with it to know that it has nothing to do with the way the Federal Reserve operates."
And yet, the Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have?
And I am the hypocrite...
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NightSurfer47 "And yet, the Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have?" I've already corrected you on this once. Second, the Austrian School mostly developed an economics that is predominantly laissez-faire. The American version of capitalism has nothing to do with laissez-faire free market capitalism.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I don't think any serious economist has suggested that the outcomes of such a system look very hopeful."
Let me give you some friendly advice. DO NOT debate economics with someone until you are ABSOLUTELY SURE you know what you are talking about, otherwise we get comments like these that are embarrassing to read. Just for future reference.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Sorry, it's difficult to keep up with your posts that are flagged. Again, though, you have done nothing here except claim that I don't know what I am talking about yet provide no more than zero evidence to reinforce your claims.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Capitalism? Seriously? You should be worried more about the Federal Reserve than you are of capitalism in general. But I get it, it's hip to be an anarchist these days.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Well, the Federal Reserve as it exists now is a consequence of the capitalist system we have. Sorry but I find that there may be problems that exist that are wider than the ones that are experienced within the United States. I suppose it was also hip to be an anarchist in the days of Bakunin, Kropotkin, Rocker, Rosenburg, etc. But thanks for the petty attempt to devalue a longstanding philosophical tradition, you phony.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve The Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have? That's ridiculous. I suppose that since the Titanic sank we should just get rid of ocean liners complete, should we not?
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "The Federal Reserve is a consequence of the capitalist system we have? That's ridiculous." I suggest you look back because I never said that.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Oh I'm sorry, you said " the Federal Reserve as it exists now is a consequence of the capitalist system we have"
Still just as ridiculous and unfounded. Something tells me you like the concept of anarchy so much you're willing to dismiss any other option and use examples like that to make your point.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "Still just as ridiculous and unfounded." No, it's exactly true, which you'd know if you understood reality. One of the central functions of the Federal Reserve now is to maintain the stability of the financial system. In other words, it only works to preserve the capitalist system in the United States. This is a fact. So what I said was exactly true.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "No, it's exactly true, which you'd know if you understood reality." Oh, I forgot. You already have it all figured it out.
"it only works to preserve the capitalist system in the United States. This is a fact."
You are obviously not familiar with the Austrian school of economics or the concept of a free market economy at all otherwise you wouldn't be making such a ridiculous claim. You are hilarious.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 I am familiar with the Austrian school - certainly familiar enough with it to know that it has nothing to do with the way the Federal Reserve operates. Furthermore, there isn't a single free market economy in the world right now, and that might be a good thing. I don't think any serious economist has suggested that the outcomes of such a system look very hopeful.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NightSurfer47 "I suppose that since the Titanic sank we should just get rid of ocean liners complete, should we not?" I never said we should get rid of capitalism because of the Federal Reserve, did I? We should get rid of capitalism because it is a barbaric, inhumane system that functions only to exploit a large majority in order to profit a slim minority. It is just about the most illogical, unworkable system imaginable.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve But you don't live under Capitalism, you live under Globalism. Globalism is against free market Capitalism. Globalists are Monopoly Men. Fortune 100 pay next to no tax, and are too big to fail because they have power over governments. Globalism uses the media to get the phoney left to blame Capitalism for its own crimes.
zephiloyd 6 months ago
@JGuildersleeve By RevelAtion I meant the documentary film IAAP will be releasing in 2012, dumbass.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 I know what you mean. That's the revelation I'm talking about. It was supposed to revealed years ago. There is no revelation. It turned into 2012 at some point along the way - but that was never mentioned when Iamaphoney claimed to have this sacred information four years ago. I suppose if he did, everybody would have burst out laughing.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
I mean, would you really take anyone seriously who said, "I have evidence that will completely change the world. It's incredibly significant and important. And I will tell you...in five years. First, enjoy my awesome editing techniques set to my own music which somehow manage to accomplish despite being burdened with this knowledge." Give me a break.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve I agree with *almost* everything you are saying, but I'd still give IAAP a chance to explain himself before I dismiss him quickly. Until then, you and I can only speculate. I, unlike you, will make my final judgement once this is all over. But so far, I've gotten nicely edited videos with great music attached, and one out of three documentaries that I greatly enjoyed, truthful or not. Sue me.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Let's put it this way - if we are to suspend our rationality and pretend like IAAP does have important information then he's committing a worse crime and should be thrown in jail for withholding evidence in a major criminal case. I am giving him the benefit of the doubt by suggesting that he's merely a manipulative hack who is unfortunately convincing a lot of vulnerable people with his fraudulent videos.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve And again, don't assume that because I believe in a little conspiracy theory that I am just a puppet and am unaware of the much more important issues that face me everyday. That's a big assumption to make yet you like to make it a lot when talking to different people.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Well, then, why do you keep giving me all the standard conspiracy theory talking points? Federal Reserve? That's right out of the Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul ilk. I'd be happy to give you the benefit of the doubt if you conveyed a single independent thought.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve So because I agree with Ron Paul's positions, I am incapable of a single independent thought? Nice assumption, asshole.
And you want to talk about a real hack, Alex Jones is the guy for you.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "So because I agree with Ron Paul's positions, I am incapable of a single independent thought?" What you're incapable of is actually understanding the simplest of statements, since I never suggested that. What I'm saying is that conspiracy theorists are so slavish that they typically hold the same views. How do you think I guessed correctly that you supported Ron Paul? You think that was just dumb luck? No, it's because you're part of a group of very predictable people.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve I don't see how being a supporter of Ron Paul and also being interested in the PID phenomenon puts me in a group of "very predictable people" but whatever. I guess I'll add that to the list of ridiculous statements you've already made and leave it at that.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Are you out of your mind? I legitimately accurately predicted that you supported Ron Paul. In that case, it makes absolutely no sense for you to conclude that it's a ridiculous statement since I outright proved my point. I'm sorry that you don't like being called predictable - nobody would - but the shoe fits in this case, by your own admission.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "I legitimately accurately predicted that you supported Ron Paul." The only reason being you thought I also was a follower of Alex Jones, also a known conspiracy theorist. I can understand why you'd make that connection, but no, I am not a supporter of Ron Paul because Alex Jones tells me to be. Which is the assumption you originally made. Talk about being a hypocrite.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "am not a supporter of Ron Paul because Alex Jones tells me to be. Which is the assumption you originally made." You should be ashamed for lying about what I said. I didn't say that in the slightest. I said you were part of an "Alex Jones pro-Ron Paul" ilk. That you derived a scarecrow argument from that in order to try and squirm your way out of the fact that I accurately predicted how predictable you are is telling of the lengths you'll go to. It's shameful.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve And please tell me, what have you contributed to iamaphoney's comments besides your elitist attitude, hostility towards other users, and your pseudo-intellectual views on economics? I would call you a troll, but no sane human being could go on this long for just a quick laugh. Instead, your actions remind me of someone who is dying for attention by going against the herd and categorizing everything in sight. It's quite sad really.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Again you are in no position to call anyone an elitist when it it you who have made claims to superior knowledge, not me. Why don't you look in the mirror, you hypocrite, before you begin hurling names in lieu of having anything of substance to say. Calling someone out for supporting a fraudulent hack who does nothing but willfully misinform suckers is not an example of elitism in the slightest. Claiming to have the smarts to be able to see things that others can't, however, is.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Do I need to quote myself? I said I felt sorry for you because you couldn't see past the Paul is Dead theory and understand what these videos really mean. Never once did I deny you any evidence of this or the possibility of a friendly debate. Does that mean I made claims to superior knowledge? Maybe somewhat, but you are blowing all of this out of proportion and I am simply defending myself from this unwarranted hostility.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "Maybe somewhat"? How about exactly. Suggesting that I can't understand the video and you can is precisely a claim to superior knowledge, which is, in fact, a textbook definition of elitism. You are lumping yourself in with a special group of people who can "see the truth" - a classic conspiracy theory rhetorical trick.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve But I never once claimed that I knew what these videos were about, did I? I was simply responding to your comments that kept bringing up Paul is Dead, and tried telling you that there was much more to them then that and I felt sorry for you that you couldn't realize that. I have no idea what the hell IAAP is doing, but I know there's a deeper meaning that you choose to ignore.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "But I never once claimed that I knew what these videos were about, did I?" You claimed you knew more than I did and you still do claim that you "know there's a deeper meaning" here. Again, pure unadulterated elitism or arrogance. "I was simply responding to your comments that kept bringing up Paul is Dead" - Then you must have been talking to an illusion since I didn't keep "bringing up Paul is Dead".
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "You claimed you knew more than I did and you still do claim that you "know there's a deeper meaning" here. Again, pure unadulterated elitism or arrogance." Sure, but is that something to get that upset about? I mean, Jesus, nothing called for the amount of slander that you or I had to deal with. You seem to get very upset when somebody believes in a conspiracy theory and is aware of something you aren't, and tries to inform you.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Haha - thanks more nauseating arrogance. Sorry that I keep preventing you from being able to "inform" me. Give me a giant break.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "Sorry that I keep preventing you from being able to "inform" me. "
It's alright. It's all just a subconscious need for attention that I, and everyone else, is well aware of. Cheer up buddy.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Again, you can respond like this all day long for all I care. If you have anything of substance to say, you would say it, rather than resort to cheap personal shots as you repeatedly do. I could care less - please continue doing it, it only serves to delegitimate your points further to anyone else who views this and proves without much doubt that you really have no response.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JGuildersleeve " If you have anything of substance to say, you would say it, rather than resort to cheap personal shots as you repeatedly do."
Hypocrisy at it's finest.
" to anyone else who views this"
Once again, a plainly visible subconscious need for attention, calling out for companionship. Tragic.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Erm, what exactly are the personal shots that I have taken? Secondly, I am not calling out for companionship. Once again, you are misreading what I've written.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
"hostility towards other users" - Total irrationality, apologizing for fraudulence, and slavish devotion to a distraction industry deserves to be met with hostility. "pseudo-intellectual views on economics" - Uh-huh. I'm the one who is straining to draw a connection between the Austrian School of economics and the current US system being protected by the Federal Reserve?
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "slavish devotion to a distraction industry" Hilarious, and it is MY comments that are full of "so many lies", talk about hypocritical.
" I'm the one who is straining to draw a connection between the Austrian School of economics and the current US system being protected by the Federal Reserve?"
I am drawing a well known connection between the Austrian school of economics and the US system that existed BEFORE the federal reserve, which you are seemingly unaware of.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 No, I am aware that the Austrian school of economics had somewhat of an influence on the US system (though capitalism in the US was NEVER laissez-faire). Unfortunately for you, what that has to do with my claim about how the Federal Reserve works to protect the current capitalist structure in the US amounts to exactly diddly. So what are you saying, that all this talk about the Austrian school has been a worthless diversion because you still haven't figured out what I meant?
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Because the Federal Reserve does NOTHING to protect the current capitalist structure, quite the opposite really. I could debate this with you all day, and I'd like to, but this is all irrelevant and has nothing to do with iamaphoney. And the only reason we are debating this is because you brought up the fact that you were much more wise than fans of iamaphoney because you knew about the real issues, once again a subconscious need for attention that is plainly visible. Sad.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 "Because the Federal Reserve does NOTHING to protect the current capitalist structure" - According to the mission statement on the Federal Reserve website, one of their central duties is to maintain "the stability of the financial system". So, yes, outside of your fantasy world, they do precisely that.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JGuildersleeve "So, yes, outside of your fantasy world, they do precisely that."
And I'm sure the Patriot Act is very patriotic simply because it says "Patriot" in the title.
Are you sure I'm under the control of a master?
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Well, I suppose we'll have to wait until TheRevelAtion. I suppose it's just as likely this is a bunch of musicians from Denmark trying to sell an album, but what if...
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Most of the people here have been saying a revelation was around the corner three years ago. There is no revelation.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Are you a socialist?
silentyp3 8 months ago
@silentyp3 I'm an anarchist but anarchism is built on the same foundations of libertarian socialism, yes.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve You are absolutely right,none of them are convincing in the slightest. But they are images that have been used before and are very well known in the occult community, which leads me to believe there's more to these videos than just Paul is Dead.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Of course, the people making these videos want you to think that. The conversations about these videos have been about things like Tavistock, Crowley, shape shifting, aliens, three years ago. There's nothing of merit to those discussions though and the fact that these videos contain references to them doesn't do anything in their favor, as far as I'm concerned.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve "Unfortunately, you are only a mouth piece for someone else's con job" Excuse me? Have I offended you someway to provoke that kind of behavior. What an asshole you are.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Um, this was a response to you telling me that I was incapable of understanding the video. In other words, you are saying that people who disagree with the conclusions of the video are not as smart as you. That is, bar none, the most nauseating arrogant position you can take and you only added to it with condescension by saying you feel sorry for me. Sorry that you can't accept a fraction of the inapproriate remarks that you shovelled in my direction, you hypocrite.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 But like I said, it's not really you speaking. I've seen that response so many times now, it's quite clear that it's simply the standard line manufactured by your masters to cover up the fact that you have really nothing to say in support of the fraudulent videos that you are buying into.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JGuildersleeve OK, since you already know so much about me and have your mind set on what my beliefs are, there's no point in responding to you. I don't know why I deserved such hostility from you nor do I think I offended you in anyway. If so, I apologize and hope to end this here. If you want to debate these videos, by all means do, but spare us of your elitist attitude next time.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 You are in no position to call anyone an elitist when it it you who have made claims to superior knowledge, not me. Why don't you look in the mirror, you hypocrite, before you begin hurling names in lieu of having anything of substance to say. Calling someone out for supporting a fraudulent hack who does nothing but willfully misinform suckers is not an example of elitism in the slightest. Claiming to have the smarts to be able to see things that others can't, however, is.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Who cares? None of this shit won't matter one day anyway.
silentyp3 8 months ago 2
@silentyp3 I care. I think any decent human being would care when a person was taking advantage of vulnerable people and deceiving them with their manufactured lies.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve That's cool, but why PID? I think there's a lot more serious fucked up frauds than pid, like ughhh the Government, The President??? There are plenty other more that could most likely effect our lives in the future. Anyway what do you think the revalation will be? Probably some gay ass video of a guy singing backwards...whoooo haha.
silentyp3 8 months ago
@silentyp3 Erm, well, I don't think making vague remarks about "the Government" and "The President" are all that valuable. In fact, the government and the President are much less problematic than the corporate structure that pretty much shapes the way governments (specific ones - not some vague "Government", I mean, could you possibly be more Western-centric?) act.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@silentyp3 But I concentrate my efforts much more on more important things like corporatization, capitalism, etc. Incidentally, there is no revelation. This is like every conspiracy theory which can only function because they string people along.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Dude chill, I was just trying to name examples lol.
silentyp3 8 months ago
@silentyp3 Well most everything won't matter "one day" right? I have no interest in PID or the occult references but the whole series, especially the music, is very intriguing. I love it.
lonedrone 8 months ago
@silentyp3
its been 40 years ago today.
and the people still believe this play
k0stil 7 months ago
@JGuildersleeve And it is you who seem so confident in their positions, that this is all a giant prank, and incapable of hearing another's point of view.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Erm, what point of view? I have debated this issue thoroughly for years. I am well aware of many points of view on this subject. You're right that I don't have any tolerance for irrationality nor do I support intellectual fraudulence, which is what this is, nor should I agree with your support of it. That's perfectly legitimate.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGUildersleeve When did I ever once claim to have superior knowledge or deny you any evidence? I am always prepared to have a friendly debate and share with others what I've discovered, but your elitist attitude is really pissing me off do I'm second guessing myself.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 When did you claim superior knowledge? Quite clearly - when you said that there is "so much in this video" that I don't understand that you evidently do. That is exactly claiming to have superior knowledge - or are you now going back on that claim? And I don't believe you are prepared to have a friendly discussion. You are showing the usual traits of the person who is only willing to have a friendly discussion with those who don't deviate from the conpsiracy party line.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve I feel sorry for you man, there's so much in this video that you're failing to see or understand. Please look beyond Paul is Dead. Iamaphoney probably doesn't even believe he's dead. This is all a red herring. LOOK CLOSER.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
Comment removed
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 Ah, yes, the old conspiracy theory chestnut about being able to see things that the rest of us can't. You'll notice of course that no one who actually has evidence and is confident in their claims ever has to resort to this petty, amateurish, pseuointellectual rhetorical posturing in order to cover up the fact that they are actually incapable of presenting evidence or retorting in any serious way. Forgive me if I remain unconvinced by your own claims to superior knowledge.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 You might as well, want to craft a response of your own rather than xeroxing the slavish standard non-response that the conspiracy theory masters have constructed for you. Unfortunately, you are only a mouth piece for someone else's con job.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve That is Ringo's voice. Look further down the comments. And when will you realize this goes far beyond just Paul is dead?
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
Comment removed
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 You're right - it is Ringo's voice from an interview where he is saying that the rumours are a load of crap. So, yeah, it's Ringo's voice but totally ripped from their context (including deleting key parts of his speech). He makes it seem as if Ringo is suggesting that The Beatles put the clues in when he is saying the opposite, when his words aren't being rearranged by a con man. This isn't surprising because Iamaphoney is a charlatan perpetrating a fraud.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 And as long as we're playing "when will you realize", I can ask when you will realize that you are being conned by a distraction industry?
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuilders
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@msg2urudy Good call! Furthermore, that's not even Ringo's voice! So maybe Ringo was replaced too! But we certainly can't jump to the conclusion that this is just another in a series of willful manipulations carried out by a team promising to reveal the truth on an alleged major scandal and criminal case for going on four years now. No, it makes more sense to believe in another chase-your-own-tail conspiracy theory, right?
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Dude what's wrong with you? Let people believe what they want, everyone has an opinion, I've seen you on a lot of pid videos and all you ever do is argue on them with people that believe the conspiracy, let them, is it really effecting your life that much, like seriously is it keeping you from sleeping at night?
silentyp3 8 months ago 8
@silentyp3 You are really missing some crucial nuances here. What makes you think I'm stopping people from believing what they want to believe? Or do you mean that Iamaphoney should monopolize the information that people should be getting and anyone who happens to question the videos constitutes some kind of serious violation. The fact is Iamaphoney is willfully manipulating the facts and in doing so is giving people inaccurate information. It is necessary to point out fraud where it exists.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Like I said, look past the Paul is Dead theory when watching these videos. Pay attention to the subliminal messages or the recurring ring of fire. Pay attention to the "superstone" phoney mentions from time to time. Look into these things. Phoney isn't the first.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
@NightSurfer47 I know. Conpiracy theory is a major industry that function to distract people from serious issues. This is why ultimately governments are in favor of them - they keep people anesthetized. Like I said, I've been watching these videos and conversing with the community for three years now. I've heard many of the so-called "deeper" message that these videos supposedly have. None of them are convincing in the slightest.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve Fraud or not, arguing isn't going to solve anything.
silentyp3 8 months ago
@silentyp3 Um, it would certainly help more than one person (or group of people) having the monopoly of information and use it to actively work at misinforming people. If you want to remain consistent in your views (and I mean yours specifically) then either both Iamaphoney and U should have a right to express their points, or neither of us should. But don't tell me that I am preventing people from believing what they want to believe - especially when you are not doing it to the fraud.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@iamaphuney
yes I'd like to take something from this. It intriques me, not just the myster of whether PID or not, but everything else. What exactly were the Beatles trying to get across in their music and since only about 100 people know what they truly were singing about, how did they come by that knowledge? Were they members of the occult? Elite? Or something else?
Pammigal 8 months ago
@iamaphuney I'd love to hear it.
lonedrone 8 months ago
@iamaphuney There is no singing backwards here. What it is is a melody and lyric that sort of makes sense (and adheres to the IAAP format) played forward but becomes Free As A Bird when reversed. I have no idea what you're daring me to do and what you mean regarding "production values".
lonedrone 8 months ago
¿Esto qué coño significa?
Ésa no es la voz de Ringo.
amananta 8 months ago
@iamaphuney I don't practice magic so I wouldn't invoke anything/anyone. My religion forbids me from doing such things.
Pammigal 8 months ago
@iamaphuney I am interested in what your videos mean. Do you know what's really going on?
NightSurfer47 8 months ago
What's with the sigils? I know they were into magic, but um...did they do any type of invoking?
Pammigal 8 months ago
Comment removed
silentyp3 8 months ago
Okay, that voice isn’t' Ringo Starr.
These videos have been going on for years now – I am now convinced that 'iamaphoney' is just some student film maker having a laugh at people. Anyone with *real* information would have put it out to the world years ago. Not released cryptic student art videos for years!
DJSpymo 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DJSpymo The audio is from a radio show called "Ringo's Yellow Submarine" and can be listened to in full on youtube. Here's the episode used in this video, if I'm not mistaken:
/watch?v=xQ33Ye82AuI
I'm pretty sure the real Ringo did that whole show. You be the judge, lol.
ChristopherGHope 8 months ago
Comment removed
silentyp3 8 months ago
@DJSpymo "Student film maker" you think? I don't think so. The amount of time, money and hard work spent making these videos is way beyond somebody doing it for "a laugh" (especially with the low view ratings).
Take IAAP's music alone. There's no way that was recorded, arranged and performed by amateurs. I mean "Shoes" is as good as anything Paul has released in recent years. I have no idea what it all means but it surely can't be a publicity stunt (as it has been going on for 4 years).
lonedrone 8 months ago
@lonedrone Erm, the very fact that he's using this alleged (falsely, I should add) criminal case to broadcast his own music seems to suggest that it is precisely a publicity stunt, no? Yes, it has backfired, because it's so overtly fraudulent that only the most vulernable devotees to conspiracy theory have been on board and even they have fallen off when the original claims to knowing the full truth have gone unfulfilled after four years or so.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
Notice Ringo didn't say double.
SB9381 8 months ago
Comment removed
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@TheRealTheCoon Well that's pretty dumb
silentyp3 8 months ago
I'm sleepy watchin this and is cool. Nice song & vid, sometimes i think i don't want a concrete answer to the mystery anymore
good night :)
olimpicus 8 months ago
@TheRealTheCoon What's kewl
silentyp3 8 months ago
I'd like to converse with this filmmaker. My email is my YouTube name @ mail.com. You know my name.
APerilousHint 8 months ago
Question.... why should we care about all of these songs the band "Revolver" sings? That's the band who sings these songs, right? What is their significance?
beatlesfan464 8 months ago
@beatlesfan464 It's the Super Furry Animals. What it all means I have no idea.
lonedrone 8 months ago
@lonedrone
No its not. All of the songs are performed by a person/band called Revlover. See the WingedBeatle series for details.
RockXLight 8 months ago
that is NOT ringo at the beginning talking... doesnt really sound like him maybe a little but not exactly
beatlesfan464 8 months ago 2
is that Hans there.... sticking his head in the water?
EliasCrowe 8 months ago
Yawn...
silentyp3 8 months ago
song all right but interested in the documentary
atom7676 8 months ago
Can't wait for TheRightAlbum and TheRevelAtion
kelvinz0r 8 months ago
@kelvinz0r can you send me therottenapple 2010 album? if you can.
beatlesfan464 8 months ago
@beatlesfan464 the videos i saw @iamaphoney channel
kelvinz0r 8 months ago
Hello Bill! :P
Godzie1 8 months ago 2
Respond to this video... this is a REALLY good song!
bones22j 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlimeAmTheBest 8 months ago
i think this guy is just reversing beatles songs to get famous, i have to admit i thought of doing this but im not a faggot
Tdwd1337 8 months ago
@Tdwd1337 You're not nearly as clever as you think either. This actually is Free as a Bird sung in reverse.
Baccus93 8 months ago
Here you go folks, listen to the song in reverse audioboo.fm/boos/390439-song-reversal-of-iiix-mmxi-getting-closer (and grab a lyric sheet to read along with)
ThelemicWaves 8 months ago
Wow. Nice job. I hear what you did. (Secret - play this song backwards and it's the exactly melody line to "Free as a Bird." Clever clever clever. I'm going to see if I hear any actual vocal reversals but I just wanted to let you know.... I know. :-)
Baccus93 8 months ago
@Baccus93 Upon further listening.... Holy Shitzu! IT IS FREE AS A BIRD reversed!
Baccus93 8 months ago
in all fairness we have been strung along in the last two years by a couple of dutch guys who are sick of playing golden earrings only hit so they though they might have some fun with us stupid idiots by dragging it out there are no more clues this all about some band trying to promote their up and coming album
M374EVL 8 months ago
@M374EVL
This hasn't been going on for two years--try four. No one promotes an album for four years by making PID videos. Dig a little deeper, Mr. Cynic.
RockXLight 8 months ago
@RockXLight look i have been watching these vids from the start if you actually read what i typed you would understand what i meant mr cynic for the last two years they have been stringing us along cos there are no more clues get it ......get over it the barrel is dry and faul will never ever admit to what has happened end of move on
M374EVL 8 months ago 3
@RockXLight "Try four" hahaha. It's sad - I remember people truly believing three years ago that the truth was right around the corner. It's amazing not only that people were played for suckers with such obvious fabrications but that some people from that time STILL remain to defend this shlock.
JGuildersleeve 8 months ago
@JGuildersleeve
I'm not defending the message; I'm only saying that they're not out to promote an album.
RockXLight 7 months ago
Been a while since I watched a phoney vid. Someone catch me up please.
DarkMoonDragon 8 months ago
IIIX ? very clever. 3rd October The Right Album, a cryptic reference to IIIX HE DIE
zephiloyd 8 months ago
@MikeyNL1038 What is? I'm starting to figure this all out after I've made a few contacts. Lets just say the ring of fire isn't such a secret anymore.
NightSurfer47 8 months ago