Added: 3 years ago
From: Nazdorovje
Views: 10,354
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why is Andy Samberg teaching math?

  • About the time when these math teachers start talking about f=(x), I start looking around at the walls of the classroom...looking at the chipped paint on the walls...looking at the design of the tiles on the ceiling...looking at the chick's breasts next to me...are those single "D" or double "D" measurements? ...looking at the chick's ass who's sitting in front of me and I think, "God-damn...there's a whole world out there having fun right now...and I'm stuck in here listening to this shit." lol

  • get a smart board loser

  • Math is totally awesome

  • I always had a problem with the 2d analogy. How could the 2d man see his house, when it has no height?

  • Dumb ass there are six demotions:

    Length

    Width

    Height

    Distance between objects

    Movement/Speed

    Time

    I'm thirteen, so I have no Idea who taught u that but Einstein don't lie.

  • This young man will make a fine teacher one day! I thought he did a great job explaining to a dumbass like me! :-)

  • In practical use, very few people other than engineers will use this. Still when handing a fourth dimension such as color, temperature, density, or time, this can be quite practical.

  • This is misleading in some sense. The fourth spatial dimension isn't some remote, entirely separate plane of existence of 4 dimensional shapes. When physicists say our space-time is 4D, they are talking about the fourth spatial dimension. Our 3D world is just a frame in a 4D timeline, and as you move throughout "time", you are jumping from one frame to another. The changing of one 3D state to another gives the illusion of motion and time. Time arises out of our experience of the 4th dimension

  • Im in pre algebra. and i totally get this. im serious xD

  • Surely if the flatlander sees in only 1 dimension, he would never see anything, for to be able to see a line, you must see both the width and length of the line. As soon as there is only a width or only a length, the line becomes invisible.

  • @TDTech1 Its a "thin line" between { infinitely small } and { invisible }.

    pun intended........Lol

  • you should of explained flat land in X, Y rather then Z, X

  • Hot subject.

  • Lol stupid question but look at that way. This is just stuff we can explain mathematically but when we try to explain it visually and even proove it..it just becomes nonsense to me. I dunno...just trying to make sense of all this that's all.

    Sorry for the double post but i really hate youtube i almost have to double post in every post i make.

  • Great job explaining what the 4 dimension might look like from a 3 dimensional perspective. The teleporting thing makes sense. I'm a very math bases person. I like to look at things mathematically but i also like to look at things visually. I"m more of a visual learner. The only problem with this grand theme of multiple spatial dimensions is that it can only be explained mathematically. Is there an organism we have discovered that has lived or still lives in the 2nd dimension?

  • Okay, how are you are pretty hot and young for a professor.

  • lol your crazy astolfodeu

  • i thought my AP calculus was really AP.. i was lied to xD hehe.. i see now.. it is not AP XD...

    thnx for the vid :)

  • you should make more, and explain 5th or 6th and beyond this was really helpful

  • but the line should not appear because then the house would be third dimensional?

  • So do Dolphins see in 4 D's since they use sonar?

  • could the universe itself be four dimensional then? imagine us as the stik figure. its a ratio stik figure= two dimensional. sphere= 3 dimensional. our world=3 dimensional. universe=4 dimensional. the universe as we see is expanding and expanding and (as scientists predict) will eventually decrease just as the sphere did to the 2 dimensional guy. so the universe could be a mere object to a whole 'nother dimension. idk im just rambling on here...

  • when you die, you live in the fourth dimension and so on.

  • I have seen the 4th dimension, it is quite real and easy to see.

  • Care to share your experiences?

  • not really, its top secret, but i will say, it is like getting high, things just pop out at you.

  • So your full of shit then?

  • I just wanted to thank you. I just watched all three parts and it is really interesting. But wouldn't a 4D being not be able to take a 3D being and show it how the 4D world is just like the 3D being in the movie Flatland shows the 2D being how the 3D world is? i mean if the 4D being or infinitive-D being is God, how would it be able though to interact with our souls after we die? Even though it can see everything, it can't do anything once our life is over.Or is there one dimension for afterlife

  • very good!

  • Very good explanation!

    I couldn't have worded it better myself...even how I worded it was almost the same.

    :O

  • You can't say that time and space is 2 different things. time can be considered as, just the next direction to go from 3d. And one could not say that we are living in 4d. We are all living in the now, which is like a point in the 4th dimension. We are moving through the 4d but not living in it. If we were, we would be able to see 3dimensional (all sides of thing at the same time) and we could freely walk from the future to the past and back again as we liked.

    But that is just my theory.

  • By no means do I mean to throw away ideas of time being a spacelike dimension. In fact thats something I think about all the time. But for a basic talk like this its easier to make the obvious distinction clear so people can visualize what I'm trying to say. I didn't want spacelike 4D confused with 4D spacetime. Though you could argue they are the same, we currently experience space and time very differently.

  • Lmao i couldnt stop looking at the poster in the background, Math is totally awesome XD, kinda lame on my opinion, nice video though

  • This is a false theory. It doesn't fully describe our reality, but merely a mathematical fantasy frame of reference that's actually used to limit our vision of greater reality.

    For example, he says that dimensions are based on degrees of freedom. Why, then, are the degrees of freedom limited to 90 degree increments? Aren't 1 degree increments different degrees of freedom?

    Once you think of a dimension as an extent of a thing, then you'll begin to fully understand dimensionality.

  • he did a good job giving a basic explanation. For those who do not understand multiple dimensions, it is fascinating...

  • This is retarded. The fact that you guys think this is fascinating is embarrassing. This is ridiculously basic to the point where I'm amazed it is considered anywhere outside the range of common sense.  Look up the concious collapsing of the superpositions of existing potentials or rebuilding a neuronet in your head that takes in 2,000,000,000 bits of information a second and only processes 2,000 of them. That might be worth your while.

  • you are off the charts you are amazing

  • u took out the answers to the test in front of the teacher LOLERIES

    p.s. good job on all 3 vids!

  • you lost me at hello!

    LOL

  • cool

  • and he is also the drummer in the best band ever.

  • Justin ftw

    Nice explanation.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more