About the time when these math teachers start talking about f=(x), I start looking around at the walls of the classroom...looking at the chipped paint on the walls...looking at the design of the tiles on the ceiling...looking at the chick's breasts next to me...are those single "D" or double "D" measurements? ...looking at the chick's ass who's sitting in front of me and I think, "God-damn...there's a whole world out there having fun right now...and I'm stuck in here listening to this shit." lol
In practical use, very few people other than engineers will use this. Still when handing a fourth dimension such as color, temperature, density, or time, this can be quite practical.
This is misleading in some sense. The fourth spatial dimension isn't some remote, entirely separate plane of existence of 4 dimensional shapes. When physicists say our space-time is 4D, they are talking about the fourth spatial dimension. Our 3D world is just a frame in a 4D timeline, and as you move throughout "time", you are jumping from one frame to another. The changing of one 3D state to another gives the illusion of motion and time. Time arises out of our experience of the 4th dimension
Surely if the flatlander sees in only 1 dimension, he would never see anything, for to be able to see a line, you must see both the width and length of the line. As soon as there is only a width or only a length, the line becomes invisible.
Lol stupid question but look at that way. This is just stuff we can explain mathematically but when we try to explain it visually and even proove it..it just becomes nonsense to me. I dunno...just trying to make sense of all this that's all.
Sorry for the double post but i really hate youtube i almost have to double post in every post i make.
Great job explaining what the 4 dimension might look like from a 3 dimensional perspective. The teleporting thing makes sense. I'm a very math bases person. I like to look at things mathematically but i also like to look at things visually. I"m more of a visual learner. The only problem with this grand theme of multiple spatial dimensions is that it can only be explained mathematically. Is there an organism we have discovered that has lived or still lives in the 2nd dimension?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
SHUT UP! Ridiculous! This science is late... you should to study Kabbalah... go to beyond the physics! The Physics is very limited, unhappy... your Theory is wrong! sorry...
could the universe itself be four dimensional then? imagine us as the stik figure. its a ratio stik figure= two dimensional. sphere= 3 dimensional. our world=3 dimensional. universe=4 dimensional. the universe as we see is expanding and expanding and (as scientists predict) will eventually decrease just as the sphere did to the 2 dimensional guy. so the universe could be a mere object to a whole 'nother dimension. idk im just rambling on here...
I just wanted to thank you. I just watched all three parts and it is really interesting. But wouldn't a 4D being not be able to take a 3D being and show it how the 4D world is just like the 3D being in the movie Flatland shows the 2D being how the 3D world is? i mean if the 4D being or infinitive-D being is God, how would it be able though to interact with our souls after we die? Even though it can see everything, it can't do anything once our life is over.Or is there one dimension for afterlife
You can't say that time and space is 2 different things. time can be considered as, just the next direction to go from 3d. And one could not say that we are living in 4d. We are all living in the now, which is like a point in the 4th dimension. We are moving through the 4d but not living in it. If we were, we would be able to see 3dimensional (all sides of thing at the same time) and we could freely walk from the future to the past and back again as we liked.
By no means do I mean to throw away ideas of time being a spacelike dimension. In fact thats something I think about all the time. But for a basic talk like this its easier to make the obvious distinction clear so people can visualize what I'm trying to say. I didn't want spacelike 4D confused with 4D spacetime. Though you could argue they are the same, we currently experience space and time very differently.
This is a false theory. It doesn't fully describe our reality, but merely a mathematical fantasy frame of reference that's actually used to limit our vision of greater reality.
For example, he says that dimensions are based on degrees of freedom. Why, then, are the degrees of freedom limited to 90 degree increments? Aren't 1 degree increments different degrees of freedom?
Once you think of a dimension as an extent of a thing, then you'll begin to fully understand dimensionality.
This is retarded. The fact that you guys think this is fascinating is embarrassing. This is ridiculously basic to the point where I'm amazed it is considered anywhere outside the range of common sense. Look up the concious collapsing of the superpositions of existing potentials or rebuilding a neuronet in your head that takes in 2,000,000,000 bits of information a second and only processes 2,000 of them. That might be worth your while.
Why is Andy Samberg teaching math?
IzzyIsou 3 weeks ago
About the time when these math teachers start talking about f=(x), I start looking around at the walls of the classroom...looking at the chipped paint on the walls...looking at the design of the tiles on the ceiling...looking at the chick's breasts next to me...are those single "D" or double "D" measurements? ...looking at the chick's ass who's sitting in front of me and I think, "God-damn...there's a whole world out there having fun right now...and I'm stuck in here listening to this shit." lol
MrSchultzstaffel 1 month ago
get a smart board loser
TylerParsonsss 2 months ago
Math is totally awesome
xCarpeJugulumx 5 months ago
I always had a problem with the 2d analogy. How could the 2d man see his house, when it has no height?
maneatingtoilets 5 months ago
Dumb ass there are six demotions:
Length
Width
Height
Distance between objects
Movement/Speed
Time
I'm thirteen, so I have no Idea who taught u that but Einstein don't lie.
crby101 5 months ago
This young man will make a fine teacher one day! I thought he did a great job explaining to a dumbass like me! :-)
SuperRedskinsRule 1 year ago
In practical use, very few people other than engineers will use this. Still when handing a fourth dimension such as color, temperature, density, or time, this can be quite practical.
narnianhero 1 year ago
This is misleading in some sense. The fourth spatial dimension isn't some remote, entirely separate plane of existence of 4 dimensional shapes. When physicists say our space-time is 4D, they are talking about the fourth spatial dimension. Our 3D world is just a frame in a 4D timeline, and as you move throughout "time", you are jumping from one frame to another. The changing of one 3D state to another gives the illusion of motion and time. Time arises out of our experience of the 4th dimension
Kasu1917 1 year ago
Im in pre algebra. and i totally get this. im serious xD
samdepot10 1 year ago
Surely if the flatlander sees in only 1 dimension, he would never see anything, for to be able to see a line, you must see both the width and length of the line. As soon as there is only a width or only a length, the line becomes invisible.
TDTech1 1 year ago
@TDTech1 Its a "thin line" between { infinitely small } and { invisible }.
pun intended........Lol
Amperdude 7 months ago
you should of explained flat land in X, Y rather then Z, X
clockwise3559 1 year ago
Hot subject.
AlgisKemezys 1 year ago
Lol stupid question but look at that way. This is just stuff we can explain mathematically but when we try to explain it visually and even proove it..it just becomes nonsense to me. I dunno...just trying to make sense of all this that's all.
Sorry for the double post but i really hate youtube i almost have to double post in every post i make.
Gforcebond 1 year ago
Great job explaining what the 4 dimension might look like from a 3 dimensional perspective. The teleporting thing makes sense. I'm a very math bases person. I like to look at things mathematically but i also like to look at things visually. I"m more of a visual learner. The only problem with this grand theme of multiple spatial dimensions is that it can only be explained mathematically. Is there an organism we have discovered that has lived or still lives in the 2nd dimension?
Gforcebond 1 year ago
Okay, how are you are pretty hot and young for a professor.
somename1235465 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SHUT UP! Ridiculous! This science is late... you should to study Kabbalah... go to beyond the physics! The Physics is very limited, unhappy... your Theory is wrong! sorry...
astolfodeu 2 years ago
lol your crazy astolfodeu
SourcesAreEverything 2 years ago 2
i thought my AP calculus was really AP.. i was lied to xD hehe.. i see now.. it is not AP XD...
thnx for the vid :)
zowi1rawr 2 years ago
you should make more, and explain 5th or 6th and beyond this was really helpful
wweguy1549 2 years ago
but the line should not appear because then the house would be third dimensional?
frootloopsfan 2 years ago
So do Dolphins see in 4 D's since they use sonar?
elvatoz 2 years ago
could the universe itself be four dimensional then? imagine us as the stik figure. its a ratio stik figure= two dimensional. sphere= 3 dimensional. our world=3 dimensional. universe=4 dimensional. the universe as we see is expanding and expanding and (as scientists predict) will eventually decrease just as the sphere did to the 2 dimensional guy. so the universe could be a mere object to a whole 'nother dimension. idk im just rambling on here...
Skimur22 2 years ago
when you die, you live in the fourth dimension and so on.
chadinterrupted 2 years ago
I have seen the 4th dimension, it is quite real and easy to see.
PurePower025 2 years ago
Care to share your experiences?
captainroger 2 years ago
not really, its top secret, but i will say, it is like getting high, things just pop out at you.
PurePower025 2 years ago
So your full of shit then?
captainroger 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
........uh.........
PARTY TIME!!!
PurePower025 2 years ago
I just wanted to thank you. I just watched all three parts and it is really interesting. But wouldn't a 4D being not be able to take a 3D being and show it how the 4D world is just like the 3D being in the movie Flatland shows the 2D being how the 3D world is? i mean if the 4D being or infinitive-D being is God, how would it be able though to interact with our souls after we die? Even though it can see everything, it can't do anything once our life is over.Or is there one dimension for afterlife
nucle4rfighter 2 years ago
very good!
thezoffmann 2 years ago
Very good explanation!
I couldn't have worded it better myself...even how I worded it was almost the same.
:O
Enepsis 3 years ago
You can't say that time and space is 2 different things. time can be considered as, just the next direction to go from 3d. And one could not say that we are living in 4d. We are all living in the now, which is like a point in the 4th dimension. We are moving through the 4d but not living in it. If we were, we would be able to see 3dimensional (all sides of thing at the same time) and we could freely walk from the future to the past and back again as we liked.
But that is just my theory.
hairybear2704 3 years ago
By no means do I mean to throw away ideas of time being a spacelike dimension. In fact thats something I think about all the time. But for a basic talk like this its easier to make the obvious distinction clear so people can visualize what I'm trying to say. I didn't want spacelike 4D confused with 4D spacetime. Though you could argue they are the same, we currently experience space and time very differently.
jedidove 2 years ago
Lmao i couldnt stop looking at the poster in the background, Math is totally awesome XD, kinda lame on my opinion, nice video though
FanChrisproductions 3 years ago
This is a false theory. It doesn't fully describe our reality, but merely a mathematical fantasy frame of reference that's actually used to limit our vision of greater reality.
For example, he says that dimensions are based on degrees of freedom. Why, then, are the degrees of freedom limited to 90 degree increments? Aren't 1 degree increments different degrees of freedom?
Once you think of a dimension as an extent of a thing, then you'll begin to fully understand dimensionality.
thinkofwhy 3 years ago
he did a good job giving a basic explanation. For those who do not understand multiple dimensions, it is fascinating...
Nazdorovje 3 years ago
This is retarded. The fact that you guys think this is fascinating is embarrassing. This is ridiculously basic to the point where I'm amazed it is considered anywhere outside the range of common sense. Look up the concious collapsing of the superpositions of existing potentials or rebuilding a neuronet in your head that takes in 2,000,000,000 bits of information a second and only processes 2,000 of them. That might be worth your while.
121tabs121 3 years ago
you are off the charts you are amazing
beatlebass9 3 years ago
u took out the answers to the test in front of the teacher LOLERIES
p.s. good job on all 3 vids!
master8black8 3 years ago
you lost me at hello!
LOL
shari53379 3 years ago
cool
kioisursktitoeiru 3 years ago
and he is also the drummer in the best band ever.
acadencePreD 3 years ago
Justin ftw
Nice explanation.
ScotchTapeLord 3 years ago