@boo66 additionally, the outer structure of the ear, head and chest all combine to produce a pattern of sound filtration and micro-reflection that's unique to each listener and changes with directionality of the sound source. So even people with hearing loss in one ear are able to perceive some directionality of sound. Likewise, fitting molds of someone else's outer ear onto your own would be highly disorienting for a couple days (they've tried this!). Cool stuff!
Living (pause) Stereo. This guy is a turd. Is this an example of superior communications skills? After watching this kiss ass to anyone who thinks I have poor communication skills I can only respond one way: Fuck You!
Fad ? ok but i like some fads LOL Did you ever check out Elvis Stereo 57? This is so much cleaner than the usual recordings.Tapes were to be erased but never were.Recorded as a backup in the classical studio .Crisp and one of my favorites.
a perfect stereoimage is difficult to achieve within restraints of living room architecture and speaker placement. thus listening to stereo can be tiring to the ear due to uncontrolled sound reflections that confuse the mind. mono is much easier to control and still gives a spatial effect of depth. nevertheless with stereo the illusion of listening into a different acoustic space is stronger. btw: you still hear mono with your two ears. never saw a stereo piano...
hello friend, good info, they do have stereo pianos of course, but i think what u are saying is when u see a piano u are seeing one,of course that depends on where u are, i,ve never seeing a human with one ear either, mono came first because of technology at the time, i still say stereo is more natural than mono, mono is one,and we have two ears for a reason,..shalom
shalom aleichem, speaking of natural within the realm of reproduction ;) what i mean is that a piano is a one point sound source, so essentially mono. besides that i believe in the power of stereo, but it can be a tiring listening experience when not properly set up. anyways, music rules.
A piano isn't a point sound source.. it produces slightly different sound from different places (the bass strings are always on the left for example) so your ears will always receive slightly different signals.
Another aspect of how stero hearing works, is the time delay between the left and right ear's signals whaich makes us able to pinpoint the source in space.. So even point sound sources we hear in true stereo!
@TwinMillMC For a time, in the mid-70's, it seemed that way, until recording companies came to the surprising realization that the average listener only has two ears, not four!
Considerable as RCA's technological achievements were during the late 50's and 60's, let's don't forget that they also pioneered what became one of the naughtiest words in the serious audiophile's vocabulary: DynaGroove, an audio abomination that had been quietly phased out by the late 70's.
a absolute highlight in music playback history! only colour tv was nearly radical new! Beside living stereo recordings still are one of the best ever and were repressed with new technique! only with
Short lived. I think they were developing it for record players in cars. From what I recall, the records were odd sized, between that of a 33 and a 78. The quality wasn't the greatest, but it would play quite a bit longer than a 33.
The record player for auto use was designed back in the 1950s, and never really worked well. They were special records that could not be played on a home system. Ultimately 8 track tape took over.
BTW the 16 2/3 RPM record was for voice recordings where fidelity wasn't a concern.
Thanks for the information. That is interesting stuff. Years ago when I was younger I told an older guy that I'm surprised they never made a record player for in cars, and he said "What do you think CD players are?" I know it's not the same thing but I still thought that was an interesting answer.
Les Paul created what's known as "multi-track" recording today, 'Ed'. I'm quite sure he experimented with earlier forms of "binaural" recording (in the context of his own sessions), but didn't actively pursue that...
Audio Fidelity always claimed THEY were the first company to regularly produce and market Stereo LP's in November 1957; then the other major labels followed by early '58, including RCA, who launched an extensive marketing campaign, including this "demonstration film"...David Sarnoff, RCA's "General", was determined to keep his company as a leader in recorded sound.
The 1940 Walt Disney movie "Fantasia" was recorded in Stereo, and I have the old soundtrack album which is in a strange type of stereo. With headphones, you get a feeling that you are sitting on a slow moving turntable, with the orchestra in a circle around you playing music...
As for a little history on Living Stereo, the first recording was done on Oct. 6, 1953. RCA released the first stereo reel-to-reel tapes in 1955. In 1958 the first Living Stereo records were finally released.
amongst my many lp's(which is another trademark used generically,like kleenex,band aid,etc)my Audio Fidelity records always mention that they introduced the world's first stereodisk in october 1957...discuss..
My question for anyone who might know is- what model RCA stereo unit is that shown in the first part of the video. The modern look of it is beautiful.
Great little artifact. Ironically, I think they were using MONO records (the RCA maroon label) for the demo! I guess the stereo versions weren't ready when they produced the promo film. (Can anyone confirm my assumption?)
@boo66 additionally, the outer structure of the ear, head and chest all combine to produce a pattern of sound filtration and micro-reflection that's unique to each listener and changes with directionality of the sound source. So even people with hearing loss in one ear are able to perceive some directionality of sound. Likewise, fitting molds of someone else's outer ear onto your own would be highly disorienting for a couple days (they've tried this!). Cool stuff!
denali99755 7 months ago
Thankfully LSD was let out the bag and shook things up....
Pappas3278 9 months ago
I had this album and played the thing to death.... I loved when stereo came in on top of mono! Those were the days!!! Man that was progress....! LOL
Gaygarious 1 year ago
"predominating" ?
"like playing two different tunes on the same violin at the same time."
JeffHallPlaysFenders 1 year ago
Living (pause) Stereo. This guy is a turd. Is this an example of superior communications skills? After watching this kiss ass to anyone who thinks I have poor communication skills I can only respond one way: Fuck You!
SweetJaneofGoth 1 year ago
I love "dramatically new." What does that mean? He drips with charisma.
EarlyLAPunk 1 year ago
Comment removed
elgavilan2000 1 year ago
Fad ? ok but i like some fads LOL Did you ever check out Elvis Stereo 57? This is so much cleaner than the usual recordings.Tapes were to be erased but never were.Recorded as a backup in the classical studio .Crisp and one of my favorites.
radiotubes 1 year ago
It was a RCA marketing gimmick back in the late 1950s.
jcrobso 1 year ago
Wow! What will they think of next?
davolente 1 year ago
"We stiil can't sync sound and picture,but some day soon".
tomflinn456 2 years ago 7
You don't see these nowdays
peugteobike 2 years ago
the way i understad this is living stereo works kind of like sex the more in tune it is the etter it sounds the better it sounds the better itll be.
ventilize 2 years ago
Stereo is a fad...mark my words.
Don't waste your money on stereo equipment. Mono is far superior.
burtoncharlessmith 2 years ago 18
I think this is my new favorite comment!
forthorton 2 years ago 2
how so? we dont hear in mono,that is why we have two ears
mastertung7 2 years ago
a perfect stereoimage is difficult to achieve within restraints of living room architecture and speaker placement. thus listening to stereo can be tiring to the ear due to uncontrolled sound reflections that confuse the mind. mono is much easier to control and still gives a spatial effect of depth. nevertheless with stereo the illusion of listening into a different acoustic space is stronger. btw: you still hear mono with your two ears. never saw a stereo piano...
45triode 2 years ago
hello friend, good info, they do have stereo pianos of course, but i think what u are saying is when u see a piano u are seeing one,of course that depends on where u are, i,ve never seeing a human with one ear either, mono came first because of technology at the time, i still say stereo is more natural than mono, mono is one,and we have two ears for a reason,..shalom
mastertung7 2 years ago
shalom aleichem, speaking of natural within the realm of reproduction ;) what i mean is that a piano is a one point sound source, so essentially mono. besides that i believe in the power of stereo, but it can be a tiring listening experience when not properly set up. anyways, music rules.
solou4 2 years ago
A piano isn't a point sound source.. it produces slightly different sound from different places (the bass strings are always on the left for example) so your ears will always receive slightly different signals.
Another aspect of how stero hearing works, is the time delay between the left and right ear's signals whaich makes us able to pinpoint the source in space.. So even point sound sources we hear in true stereo!
boo66 2 years ago
@burtoncharlessmith - You wait.... Quadraphonic will outperform both. Soon Quadraphonic High Fidelity Victrola's will be the standard at RCA.
TwinMillMC 1 year ago
@TwinMillMC For a time, in the mid-70's, it seemed that way, until recording companies came to the surprising realization that the average listener only has two ears, not four!
Considerable as RCA's technological achievements were during the late 50's and 60's, let's don't forget that they also pioneered what became one of the naughtiest words in the serious audiophile's vocabulary: DynaGroove, an audio abomination that had been quietly phased out by the late 70's.
librarybob1958 9 months ago
What is the name of the song in the beginning at :22?
Blasingame0 2 years ago
a absolute highlight in music playback history! only colour tv was nearly radical new! Beside living stereo recordings still are one of the best ever and were repressed with new technique! only with
this invention Hi Fidelity is that what we
call it today!
kbc3000 3 years ago
is anyone breathing heavy yet? or just laughing your ass off . . . .
ttoupal 3 years ago
16 1/3 ?
Plan9wood 3 years ago
Short lived. I think they were developing it for record players in cars. From what I recall, the records were odd sized, between that of a 33 and a 78. The quality wasn't the greatest, but it would play quite a bit longer than a 33.
bigred46224 3 years ago
Thanks for the info. Record players in cars, interesting I always wondered if they ever tried that.
Plan9wood 3 years ago
The record player for auto use was designed back in the 1950s, and never really worked well. They were special records that could not be played on a home system. Ultimately 8 track tape took over.
BTW the 16 2/3 RPM record was for voice recordings where fidelity wasn't a concern.
thekidrocks72 3 years ago
Thanks for the information. That is interesting stuff. Years ago when I was younger I told an older guy that I'm surprised they never made a record player for in cars, and he said "What do you think CD players are?" I know it's not the same thing but I still thought that was an interesting answer.
Plan9wood 3 years ago
Lol I wondered about that fact too when I was younger! I could understand why that idea never flew.
Partier29 2 years ago
Les Paul created what's known as "multi-track" recording today, 'Ed'. I'm quite sure he experimented with earlier forms of "binaural" recording (in the context of his own sessions), but didn't actively pursue that...
fromthesidelines 3 years ago
Audio Fidelity always claimed THEY were the first company to regularly produce and market Stereo LP's in November 1957; then the other major labels followed by early '58, including RCA, who launched an extensive marketing campaign, including this "demonstration film"...David Sarnoff, RCA's "General", was determined to keep his company as a leader in recorded sound.
fromthesidelines 3 years ago
who actually invented stereo sound??--I've heard it was Les Paul.
RockinEd 3 years ago
The 1940 Walt Disney movie "Fantasia" was recorded in Stereo, and I have the old soundtrack album which is in a strange type of stereo. With headphones, you get a feeling that you are sitting on a slow moving turntable, with the orchestra in a circle around you playing music...
weenielongus 2 years ago
Some of the best sounding records I own.
As for a little history on Living Stereo, the first recording was done on Oct. 6, 1953. RCA released the first stereo reel-to-reel tapes in 1955. In 1958 the first Living Stereo records were finally released.
champcar4ever 3 years ago
amongst my many lp's(which is another trademark used generically,like kleenex,band aid,etc)my Audio Fidelity records always mention that they introduced the world's first stereodisk in october 1957...discuss..
renofirvine 3 years ago
"Living Stereo" was first introduced in early 1958...
fromthesidelines 3 years ago
My question for anyone who might know is- what model RCA stereo unit is that shown in the first part of the video. The modern look of it is beautiful.
sowhatdude1 3 years ago
RCA wasn't the first to use stereo.The budget label Remington recorded the Cininnati Symphony in stereo in 1953! But had to put it out in mono.
diofan28 3 years ago
Interesting clip. Amazing what they could do back then without today's technology.
jerone2003 3 years ago
when did living stero come out?
andybowe 3 years ago
rca was first with stereo records? how/when did other companies follow? did rca sue for patent infringement for the design?
VideyoJunkei 3 years ago
Gotta love them records!
ToastmachineIdiot 3 years ago
The Ferde Grofe LP, I believe, is a Columbia green label pressing. I have it, and it's from the late forties. MONO. lol, nice going, RCA.
The sound is MUCH better than the video.
turntablesrock 3 years ago
I bet the gentleman hosting the presentation just couldn't wait to get his hands on a copy of Hendrix' "Electric Ladyland"...
mellotrongirl 3 years ago
excellent video very interesting
i dont think cd's or ipods will ever be this exciting!! vinyl rocks!!
qwhg 4 years ago
Great little artifact. Ironically, I think they were using MONO records (the RCA maroon label) for the demo! I guess the stereo versions weren't ready when they produced the promo film. (Can anyone confirm my assumption?)
RonLev
Philly
ron101346 4 years ago 2
I noticed the same thing. I'm thinking "Aren't those mono records they're showing?". No shaded dogs to be seen.
champcar4ever 3 years ago
Tanks, Very interesting
PINOTEA64 4 years ago 2