Deathly Hallows - Part 2 Deleted Scene: Horcruxes Explained

[xxxEastendersFanxx]

0:10 Hermione is like omg Ron is so hot

[pebbypuppy]

you're a horcrux, Harry.

[Mylifeisaboutstage]

FLUER NEEDS TO SOUND MORE FRENCH

[kenshinjd]

part 1 was much better than the 2nd half imo

[GaladedridDamodred]

I honestly don't know what's more disturbing, that Hermione is willingly transforming into Bellatrix Lestrange, or that Fleur owns a corset, bitch boots and a dress with a boob window.

[cheshirecat741]

I loved the way Hermione looked at Ron at 0:12

[sabilopod]

and, in my mind,''that's perfect, thank you phlegm'' :)) lol.

[LoboWarriorForever]

That explained Horcruxes perfectly :)

[bryceshilton]

Yeah, "I can't really explain it" really paints a picture in my head of what a horcrux is, thanks WB!

[xBellatrixLestrangex]

Didn't Fleur have a very distinctive French accent in the 4th film? I can't really hear it here...

[Ronnines]

@xBellatrixLestrangex She improved her english, that's all ;)

[pebbypuppy]

@Ronnines she got a job at gringotts, to 'eemprove 'er eenglish' :D

[corerid54]

why do you deleted scene??

[chibizeru]

It would've been hilarious if Hermione turned into a cat again.

[Beckiiy100]

@chibizeru LOL XD

[AlexRoshanStewart]

@chibizeru Oh my gosh, you genius!

[kkof007s]

wow... as much as i love watching extra bits... this is a great wee lesson in what i DONT need in my current script! the visuals (and that Horcrux sound harry can't get outa his head) they DID keep in say so much more.... tx for the share!! xo

[SnakesOfTerror]

Omg this is an amazing clip! It shows how Harry knows about the horcruxes and fleur with bellwethers clothes! I read about this scene on mugglenet and as soon ad I did I rushed onto utube to check it out! Totally worth it I love Harry potter deleted scenes!

[Dudetomdude]

Clemence Poesy <3

[zach2992]

The movie was only 2 hours- much more time for scenes like this.

[mistaseth]

@zach2992 Scenes aren't just cut for the sake of keeping the running time down. There are many other issues, the most obvious being the pacing. Many people already complain that the beginning was clunky and too drawn out. Adding another scene (an unnecessary one at that) would have messed up the pacing even more. If they did have to include one extra scene at the beginning, I would select the one with Luna since it explains why she is all-of-a-sudden at Hogwarts later in the film.

[zach2992]

@mistaseth I haven't seen that one, but it sounds like it'd be good, since I too was wondering how she got back.

[LoboWarriorForever]

@mistaseth Where can I find that Luna scene you talked about

[fantastischfish]

@LoboWarriorForever Errrmmm, I think mistaseth was being sarcastic. There is no explanation for why Luna would be safely back at Hogwarts after being held hostage by Death Eaters for months and helping Harry Potter to escape. She arrived through the secret passage into the Room of Requirement, along with Dean Thomas. In the book, Dean is on the run from snatchers and is later imprisoned at Malfoy Manor, there is no earthly explanation as to how he was living at Hogwarts unharmed in the film.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish you do realize that at the start of every movie it says 'based on the book "TITLE" by J.K Rowling.' not 'Is from the book' if everything was changed except the main characters and the main story plot it could still be described as 'based'

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda There's a difference between not following the book exactly and making GLARING continuity errors. The entire series prior to DH part 2 talks about how much Death Eaters hate 'mud bloods'. This is not just in the book, it's in the films too, repeatedly. To then suddenly have Muggle Born characters living at Hogwarts instead of being on the run is a terrible continuity error.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish your missing the point.... as i said, they could have aa hypogriff looking like a cow, harry a tall lanky guy, snape happy as a hatter, dumbledore not looking so old, diggory coming back from the death, a different horcrux, maybe an additional horcrux and more stuff added in and they could still say "based on the book" remember movies are movies and books are books. the author of the book and movie script are totally different people re-creating similar worlds not the same one.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda I'm not missing the point. When they ignore things they've already done in the FILM then it's poor continuity. A good film shouldn't contradict something it set up earlier in the series. They've clearly said in ALL previous films that Death Eaters hate mudbloods and want them dead. Hermione is tortured because of it in DH part 1. Yet suddenly in DH part 2, Dean and other 'mudbloods' are alive and well at Hogwarts which is under DE control? Silly.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish Contradictions are possible within this movie series cause of the various script writers and movie directors. Also many times within the movie, the director wishes us to understand some points once, without having him to point it out every time. ie) Hogwarts is the most secure place in the world and that even Voldermort wouldn't easily attack it. this is pointed out in movies 1-6 and thus it is reasonable that they are back at school and safe without having to spell it out.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Still not a good explanation. There are Death Eaters (Voldemort's minnions incase you'd forgotten) working at Hogwarts, so clearly Voldemort has infiltrated the school. And even pureblood wizards like Neville are hiding out in the Room of Requirement. There is just no excuse for this poor continuity.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish once again you tie in the continuity from the books. The movie never suggests that only pure bloods can find the room of requirement, but to those "who seek for it" whoever that may be. secondly, the death eaters who are currently in hogwarts is..... Snape?? the rest are students who are nicely escorted to the dungeon.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda I didn't say that only purebloods can find it. I don't where you've got that from but I never said it.I said that even purebloods are suffering, so therefore 'Mudbloods' would definitely not be safe. No, there are two deatheaters mentioned by Neville as he brings Harry etc through the secret passage, he talks about the Carrows. I'm not talking about continuity from the books at all, it's all mentioned in the films.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish I misread your last comment where you said purebloods i thought u said mudblood. my bad on that point. anyways its a movie. tbh im not even a fan of it. i only watch it cause of Emma Watson. lol. so ill leave it here. you fanatics can rant all you want but remember, its a damn movie and nearly every damn movie made has flaws in it. bad continuity or not the movie made sense, people watched it and was entertaining. I suggest you take it less seriously or make 1 your self :P

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Thanks for clarifying about the misread. However, I'm not buying the 'I'm not even a fan' argument, nor the 'you fanatic can rant...' comment either. I think you're just trying to get out of admitting you were wrong.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish no actually im not a fan... rofl. I just wished maybe you could view the movie in the point of the director and/or editor. I study film and realize how hard the task is, especially when the consumers (viewers) are demanding alot. every cut, every remake, every change of scene is stressed out further by the fact that HP books being so big. there are many many themes, story lines and factors in the movie that sometimes the director must give up 1 to make the others work better.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda give up a few in this case

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda A ha! You study film....this explains so much!!

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish yup. was a nice condo/debate we had. i actually rewatched the film to review the points you said. (:

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Glad you rewatched. However, my last remark wasn't a compliment. But thanks for responding. I don't continue debates with 'film students'.

[fantastischfish]

@mistaseth I agree about the Luna things...and Dean Thomas too for that matter. I mean, Luna is pure blood so, whilst inaccurate, she could feasibly have been there once the Death Eaters were sure that her father wasn't harbouring Harry. But Dean was muggle born.

[MrBurgundy76]

@zach2992 no. this scene is highly unnecessary. but emma is so damn hot that ill watch it 10 times.

[YoseMiteEmery]

I don't get it... why wasn't this in the film?

[mistaseth]

@YoseMiteEmery Because it's very unnecessary and would probably mess up the pacing.