At ICCF10, August 2003, Doc Patterson said that the excess heat produced by his PPC had a key ingredient, the nickel used to coat the beads. When Doc Patterson ran out of this coating, he was not able top obtain any more from the European manufacturer and could not repeat the excess heat reaction using his beads.
If the Paterson Cell actually worked, they could get an up-front $200,000 licensing award from the AERO Award for qualifying for a new energy breakthrough.
In some cases, I question honesty. In most cases, I question methods and interpretations of results. For example, I personally know 1freedomfighter1 as someone with utmost integrity, honesty and passion, but I find his work lacking basic controls and documentation so the results are not useful.
And if any one wants to build one of these cells I will be happy help with email information any time FREE, there is lots of little things people have to aviod such as running your intake into your manifold well away from electrical wires as the ions (plasma) will go threw materil to go to electricty in wires. also no sharp edges on your plates or tubes as current will jump off them, little things like that that make all the differnce in the world.
there was no errors in the pons and flishmans work, we have been duped out of clean cheap energy by oil companys and goverments that dont whant us to be free of there dependants, then there is the idiots that say it's not posible because of 100 year old text books and dont bother to do the work.
yes I worked on this stuff for 2 years with limited funds as well. i was able to double my fuel milage as well as prove a new field of energy assosiated with electrolisis of water. You can view all my work at griffandsofdawn*com general section page 4 free energy source.
I want to be clear i am 100% sure if i did not have health and money problems I would have done way better milage as I built a crude cell with no outer SS tube as it should have been, plus a charging vat would have helped alot too. If you read you will see I run a negative cell.
the problem is that cold fusion was killed in its cradle by hot fusion researchers and companies, the people that were assigned to test the device were also big anti-coldfusion supporters.
whatever happens inside a cold fusion cell, its hard to expain it, and any results provided by research into cold fusion have been turned down by 'established scientists' whom often refuse to even look at it or publish anything about it due to the stigma that surrounds cold fusion.
Much like how the guy in this video refused to look into this device even though others have tested his device and found overunity. Some scientists treat science as a religion and less like science. Anything that challenges their preconceived notions is dismissed.
This has been flagged as spam show
Latest LENR ("Cold Fusion") work Wired Magazine UK article on Rossi E-Cat.
1. E-Cat can be started on demand.
2. E-Cat can be turned off anytime.
3. E-Cat's power output level can be controlled.
4. E-Cat can output 110 degrees C heat.
5. E-Cat can be run in controlled self-sustained mode.
6. E-Cat is economical to build and run.
7. E-Cat produces clean power with no toxic waste..
psitronx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At ICCF10, August 2003, Doc Patterson said that the excess heat produced by his PPC had a key ingredient, the nickel used to coat the beads. When Doc Patterson ran out of this coating, he was not able top obtain any more from the European manufacturer and could not repeat the excess heat reaction using his beads.
psitronx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real but the coverup is strong, if you are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just search for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in the youtube video search , it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
lutherarao 1 year ago
haha france
collapseofthedollar 3 years ago
If the Paterson Cell actually worked, they could get an up-front $200,000 licensing award from the AERO Award for qualifying for a new energy breakthrough.
ThorGoLucky 3 years ago
So you're saying the researchers on these clips are not being honest when they say the device actually works? That's priceless.
searcher619 3 years ago
In some cases, I question honesty. In most cases, I question methods and interpretations of results. For example, I personally know 1freedomfighter1 as someone with utmost integrity, honesty and passion, but I find his work lacking basic controls and documentation so the results are not useful.
ThorGoLucky 3 years ago
And if any one wants to build one of these cells I will be happy help with email information any time FREE, there is lots of little things people have to aviod such as running your intake into your manifold well away from electrical wires as the ions (plasma) will go threw materil to go to electricty in wires. also no sharp edges on your plates or tubes as current will jump off them, little things like that that make all the differnce in the world.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
Let's see your plans. Provide a link to a site where we can review your plans.
searcher619 3 years ago
I use a Joe cell, it is negativly charged water and I doubled my fuel milage with it, i posted a link to where you can view my 2 years of work below.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
I posted a link to all my work below, its actaly Thors website that posted 4 days ago.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
I see no link
searcher619 3 years ago
griffansofdawn*com page 4 user name Gunner, forums general section, page 4, topic free energy source.
Cheers.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
there was no errors in the pons and flishmans work, we have been duped out of clean cheap energy by oil companys and goverments that dont whant us to be free of there dependants, then there is the idiots that say it's not posible because of 100 year old text books and dont bother to do the work.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
You have some facts to support your claim? I have heard that claim made for MANY years now and yet no one has been able to come up with proof.
searcher619 3 years ago
yes I worked on this stuff for 2 years with limited funds as well. i was able to double my fuel milage as well as prove a new field of energy assosiated with electrolisis of water. You can view all my work at griffandsofdawn*com general section page 4 free energy source.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
I want to be clear i am 100% sure if i did not have health and money problems I would have done way better milage as I built a crude cell with no outer SS tube as it should have been, plus a charging vat would have helped alot too. If you read you will see I run a negative cell.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
the problem is that cold fusion was killed in its cradle by hot fusion researchers and companies, the people that were assigned to test the device were also big anti-coldfusion supporters.
whatever happens inside a cold fusion cell, its hard to expain it, and any results provided by research into cold fusion have been turned down by 'established scientists' whom often refuse to even look at it or publish anything about it due to the stigma that surrounds cold fusion.
hyperforce 3 years ago
Much like how the guy in this video refused to look into this device even though others have tested his device and found overunity. Some scientists treat science as a religion and less like science. Anything that challenges their preconceived notions is dismissed.
searcher619 3 years ago