THE CAMERAS ARE NOT A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO ANYTHING! They are merely a realization of an Orwellian world!!! Stop big government! Stop the spying! WE HAVE RIGHTS AS HUMAN BEINGS!
In America, we don't have speed cameras... so we can speed when we either have a radar detector, know where the cops are, when you don't see any cops, and if you know where to speed... In America, only idiots get pulled over for speeding.
@Molo9000 Yes, the point is not to fine a lot of people. It is to get them to slow down. Therefore the more visible they will get more people to slow down when they see them, and that way avoiding accidents, or decreasing the risk of massive injures because of the lowered speed.
I live in uk for five-year and I have no licence or insurance. I speed on same camera every day sometime I drunk... I never been caught...lol fuck uk police lol lol
Even if its a revenue generator, and only saves ONE life its done its job. I can't see why people complain about speed cameras. People on the news complaining about them are basically telling the country they wanna speed and get away with it. in what way are they hurting? There is NO negative out come to them unless they are faulty. If your speeding YOUR IN THE WRONG.. its not the cameras fault people stick their foot down to far and ignore the law...
Attitudes like that are why we live in a police state now. NOTHING is more precious than freedom (and independence) - And that includes the freedom to be at risk or do risky things.
If we were dying out, you might have a point. But as it is, we are teetering on the brink of collapse as this rock can not support 6.5 billion properly. And you want to keep more alive? You're insane (& a touchy-feely liberal - the bane of society and of freedom).
this rock can't support 6.5bn people. is that your own opinion? have you done any research on the matter? this planet could easily support another 50bn with space left over. just cos the oil's gonna dry up in a couple decades and the atmosphere's warming up doesn't mean the population's gonna level out. don't get me wrong, i'd love it if the cylons were to come and nuke the place but that's just wishful thinking.
@t47i You you pull a number out of your ass while trying to sound authoritative. People require infrastructure. There are not enough resources to even come close to your fantasy #s. What you don't know, is that, ignoring infrastructure, without GE crops, we could only feed 4 billion at MOST. We are struggling to scrape by with 6.5. We're managing that only because of aquifers which are being drained FAST. Food, water, energy, & raw materials are in too short supply for much more than we have.
@usquanigo well of course. you're welcome to believe those things if that's what you've read or been told but i suggest you think about it a little. not enough crops? grow more in massive factories. not enough water? desalination plants. energy / i take it you mean electricity. nuclear fusion/fission/wind/solar/any or all of the thousands of techniques. i don't have the planet's mineral manifest with me right now but let's say for now that you're right. there's no iron left. one word. asteroids
@usquanigo you're obsessed with my arse. admit it. you wish it was your hand up there don't you? desalination is expensive. sure but we're talking about survival of billions of people. don't you think it's worth it? if you can't think of the solution to upsetting the salinity of the oceans then you're an idiot. so growing more food doesn't solve the problem of not enough food. i take that back about you being an idiot. you're a retard and you can't think for yourself. you read nasa news much?
@t47i People like you astound me. Factories don't produce food, brilliance. And despite your lack of understanding of the real issues and dangers of population, you are so programmed by your society that you are compelled to lash out against anyone that doesn't support increasing it further. You just can't help yourself, can you? How quickly you turned to personal insults - AFTER first making things up. That says it all.
@t47i baby how old are you?? because you seemed like a 12 years old... no,, 8 years old... all the solution are possible... but why it isnt any??? the side effects are too devastating... cut our forests, oxygen resources for crops??? do you know how much water used to grow a single cattle? and how long all the waste recycled? humanity will vanish before the world come back into its good old condition... asteroid? come on,, we will die before we able to mine it... pfffft... liberals...
@usquanigo killing people isn't really the answer to an over population on this "rock"..Birth control would suit better. Not that i agree with your opinion, being on the brink of collapse. Love how your flaming my attitude haha good one. Attitudes like yours, thinking of yourself and not others is whats wrong with this world. Sure risk your own life, but when others are involved there needs to be boundaries. I can tell whats in your head. ME>EVERYTHING ELSE. Assume you'll just read "blah blah"
@Made4Viol3nce the way to get the populatioin to stop going up is to get the extremely poverished out of povity, then they'll stop having 10 kids per family. course, birth control's a good idea too. official projections are 10bn by 2050. if bill gates has anything to do with it it'll be a lot less. YT search "bill gates vaccines". scary!
@Made4Viol3nce Not necessarilly the law itself is wrong, it's the camera's lack of discretion or tolerance. 60 ok, but if you stray over to 61 and pass by a speed camera, you get points on your license. Speed limits themselves are not in question here, the criteria used by speed cameras is the problem. I've never heard of a throttle or a car that can maintain a steady speed 100% of the time on a road. Physics and momentum will always stray a moving vehicle a bit more or less the desired speed.
looooooooooool he said I can be high on magic mushroms on a stolen nissan daaaaamn he is awesome I have a feeling that he get's high probably on weed and get drunk all the time and eat magic mushrom XD
And you can't blame the local councils for this either as they don't get a penny of the revenue,phantom is so right,people are getting more stupid then ever.
Hm. I am not sure what point the Top Gear guys are trying to make. I see it as an excellent way to raise money. Why not? We need to get money from somewhere, so instead of raising taxes, we can get it from people who break the traffic rules. Simple. And people have a choice.
Speeding may be only 7 percent of all car deaths, that doesn't mean it's against the law. So they make 70 million pounds for the government. Stop speeding and that won't be a problem either.
Also @phant0mh0b0, you hit the kid at 25, he gets hurt. You hit the kid at 50, he's dead.
@Hanser Kid doesn't run into the street without looking, kid doesn't get hurt, or killed for that matter. I'm not saying the speeder is innocent. I'm just saying to open your eyes and realize the kid could've avoided getting hurt altogether.
Just because it's a kid, a pedestrian isn't exempt from traffic laws. Jaywalking included.
I'm sure you can understand that, if you let go of the emotional and moral bias supporting the child, and look at it logically.
I live in Hong Kong. Most of the cinema not hiding, but they have a sign telling drive to slow down so that they voluntary obey the the law. Of course, the police here also has hidden cinema in highway.
In here, drunk driving and drug driving are more common to cause death.
I don't think many people were in any doubt that it was a form of taxation when they started springing up. Most police forces have quotas now on traffic cop activity as it is a source of revenue for them.
@KurdPro77 yea they always stand, they move around a bit when they bring cars in and do other stunts, or move to another area to look at something etc
Sort of related, I heard a radio discussion regarding "Red light" cameras in the USA. Which said there was mounting pressure to remove them and many States were possibly in the process of doing so.
The reason being that it was un-constitutional as it shifted the emphaise from the police authority proving that you had broken the law to the individual having to prove that they had not.
I thought it was interesting and I'm fairly sure that would count for speed cameras as well.
I live in Arizona, and we have used "Photo-Radar" all across the State, but recently, turned them OFF...!
Even when AZ (USA) can't balance the State Budget, Photo-Radar is not an option.... It turns out, "Photo-Radar" is not a "Money-Maker".
Overall, the Court's Legal cost (legally serving summons in the U.S.), IS enough to end this STUPID crap... until I'm sent a 'Certified Summons for Court', I haven't been properly Summoned.....
I live in Arizona, and we have used "Photo-Radar" all across the State, but recently, turned them OFF...!
Even when AZ (USA) can't balance the State Budget, Photo-Radar is not an option.... It turns out, "Photo-Radar" is not a "Money-Maker".
Overall, the Court's Legal cost (legally serving summons in the U.S.), IS enough to end this STUPID crap... until I'm sent a 'Certified Summons for Court', I haven't been properly Summoned.....
now they have "safety cameras" which are red light and speed cameras in one, so if u decide that u cant safely stop at the yellow, and would be safer if you accelerate a little to get through,, you;ll get a little ticket.
If it werent for the speed camera's I'd be paying a lot more taxes... I drive about 250km's a day and I refuse to drive any faster to make up time lost by traffic and informed my employer about that.
Most accident don't even occur because of speeding. It has to do with poor judgment in other areas; driving vs. when to turn or catching a car in a blind spot when trying to switch lanes. Hell. I've seen a girlfriend run over her boyfriend while they were drunk having fun in the car in a Wendy's parking lot.
A stupid camera may raise money in fines, but isn't going to do shit when trying to save lives. Some people should not even be issued a license in the first place.
Here in The Netherlands they fine the owner of the car via his number plate. So even if your dog is driving you still can get fined if he is speeding :P
if everyone would help destroying these damn taxmachine-cameras then politicians would be quicker to remember that a much more simple devise called 'guillotine' can still be used on them too
Speeding doesn't kill. Stupidity does. And No, not just the idiot who was doing 120mph/200kmh down his neighborhood. No no no. I mean the idiot who isn't looking out as he leaves his driveway, or the child who's parents didn't teach him NOT TO RUN INTO THE ROAD. Hell, I could be going 25 in a 25 zone, and if a kid runs out into the road, he's still gonna get hurt. I swear, as people get dumber, the laws get stricter.
(Oh god, better put my flame suit on before the pro-life hippies get me!)
@phant0mh0b0 Agree. but its not as people get dumber, the laws get stricter. Its the exact opposite. As the laws get stricter, the people get dumber. Cause people take it for granted that drivers arent suppose to do this and that. They forgot that, for them to not take an extra few steps is easy, for drivers to brake, the driver must be able to react quickly, the brake fluids have to be working properly, the brakes have to be working properly, the tyres must be able to grip the road, etcetc.
@Hellvin Well said, you're actually absolutely right. It's a vicious cycle of people thinking less for themselves. Not to sound like a crazy anti-government anarchist, but really, it does feel like they're trying to reduce our thinking processes one by one.
@phant0mh0b0 hahas, remember remember, the 5th of November, the gunpowder treason and plot.
but seriously speaking, all the stupid laws around are giving advantages to certain sides on given situations like, pedestrians > drivers. This makes it rather unfair to the drivers when there are pedestrians who dont value their lives. However, its not exactly the govt fault. We the people, are all selfish and unwilling to be more thoughtful of someone else, therefore, govt intervenes.
@nookiex6 Here's my answer: The child shouldn't be running into the road in the first place. Just like the car shouldn't have been speeding. Both parties are at fault.
Re-read my comment calmly and you'll see that I'm not condoning speeding. I'm just saying that if the child knew he/she shouldn't run into the road without looking first, then that would be one less traffic-accident. You can't just ignore the child's bad decision (or bad parenting) and blindly point the blame toward the driver.
@phant0mh0b0 You're an idiot. Really. Like you'll have enough time to react to a kid in the road at 120mph rather than 25.
And who the fuck said pedestrians can't be in the road? Kids play in the road. Unless you were trapped in your room playing video games (most likely no friends).
@tomthedestroyer I thought parks are for children, ma bad than. Gonna take my vehicle and drive through the park than. USE A GOD DAMN SIDEWALK if you dont want to get run over. Im not for speeding, just against road obstacles such as pedestrians and cyclists (without any license and knowledge of traffic signs/laws).
I am not placing blame on either side, because I believe drivers have just as much responsibility to not hit something, regardless of whether it should be there or not. But read the comment again - I said if a child runs into the street, regarding stupidity. The driver shouldn't have been speeding, but the kid shouldn't have ran into the street without looking either. Both parties were stupid.
And really, trying to insult someone personally on the web?
@phant0mh0b0 Which car will stop faster if it loses control. The one going at 120mph or the one at 25 mph? And no, it's not the idiot losing control, what if the tire blew out due to whatever reason. Which one is likely to survive. Blown out tire at 25mph or at 120mph ? Fucking moron.
@StreetMagus If you read my post thoroughly, I didn't exactly defend speeding. I am just pointing out that it's not just the guy who was speeding sometimes. But even if that were the case, Speeders are scapegoated often anyway.
I was just saying, regardless of the speed a car is going, a child will get hurt either way if the kid walks out into the street. If someone pulls in front of another car, a collision occurs regardless of speed.
Reading comprehension bro, you might want to learn it.
@StreetMagus Who's driving 120mph? Most cars aren't going to be on a stretch of road way where they can reach that speed. Most people when speeding go anywhere from 5-25mph over the limit. So a 65 zone you an expect a speeder to be trucking 70-90mph. Either way, the option for 25mph is not present on the interstate. And no person in their right mind (unless racing) is going to double the speed limit on a city-town street. That often results in a suspended license and very hefty fines.
@StreetMagus you are the dipshit, they go 200mph on the autobahn every god damned day, this is about money, wake up, and for the record keep your old ass in the slow lane
@phant0mh0b0 the difference is this easy math: Idiot drives only 25, sees a kid, slows down, and if he still hits the kid, the kid is probably going to be fine, as he will be hit by the car with a speed of let's say 5 km/h. Now the idiot is driving 200. He even doesn't see the kid caus he is too fast. Kid's body splattered in many pieces flying through the air. After 300 meters or so, the idiot steps out of his car, only to tell the parents, it was their fault not his? Who's the idiot?
@MatthezAustria You, for misinterpreting my comment just like every other guy responding. I didn't say the driver isn't at fault. Nor did I say the kid dies, Mr. Morbid. I am pointing out what you, just like many other people, seem to be blind to - the fact that children shouldn't be RUNNING INTO THE ROAD in the first place. I clearly stated that the driver is an idiot for speeding there. But the child should've been taught better than to blindly run into the road.
@MatthezAustria Don't you ever forget that humans are NOT EXEMPT from traffic laws, just because they're not in a car. The big problem is that somehow, people think they have the right of way on roads made for cars. That is why everybody blindly persecutes a driver when a car-to-person collision occurs. Nobody ever asks "Was the person following proper safety procedures? Does he even know what a crosswalk is?"
Hence, I'll repeat:
STUPIDITY is what causes accidents, speeding-idiots included.
"Good gracious people are getting hurt when they're illegally crossing the street! Quick Thompson, we need to think of a solu- I GOT IT. WE'LL BAN AUTOMOBILES FROM BEING WITHIN 1000 FEET OF A PERSON."
That, or we need flying cars soon so we can be on a completely different level of elevation from pedestrians.
@lazy0frog I guess you didn't thoroughly read the comment. So, let me take the comprehension portion out for you.
I didn't say the kid getting hit at 120 mph has no consequence. Nor did I condone said driver's actions. I am simply inferring that the kid has no business being in the road, especially just jumping out, in the first place.
You can't ignore this fact and place 100% blame on the driver, regardless of speed. Traffic laws apply to humans just as much as cars.
@phant0mh0b0 True but you can't control every kid that is near the street...sure the kid has no business in the middle of the road ... but weren't you a kid ? how many times your parents told you you have no business with something and you didn't listen?
so if you can't control the kid you try to control the driver with those speed limits....
don't get me wrong i love speed but not at the cost of lives man .... come on
@lazy0frog I understand your point and of course, I value human lives. I just feel it's not fair when cars and drivers are narrowed out as the bad guy in almost all situations. When you look at it with cold-logic, disregarding any moral bias (like "dawwww it's only a kid!") , Speed isn't the only factor for an accident.
If we keep letting the "mad vegetarians on bicycles" get their way by playing the moral card, we'll soon be outlawed from driving on any road next to a sidewalk at this rate...
At the end of his life, the deadliest gunfighter of the Old West is given a choice: Hell or redemption. He chooses redemption and God's Archangel transports him to modern day Los Angeles to serve bloody, frontier justice on the worst dregs of society.
I wouldn't have a problem with speed cameras if they would just be honest as to what they're there for: To raise revenue from people breaking the law. I mean, think about it: You have to be speeding for them to get you at all (assuming, of course, the camera isn't set for the wrong speed or something), so you have to be in the wrong for them to fine you. But if they say it's for public safety, but don't deploy them in a way to help public safety, that's disingenuous.
Speed cameras are cash cows for the government! I do not believe we have speed cameras here in America yet. Our big thing right now is traffic light cameras to catch people who run red lights. i support those.
In de early days when speeds didnt exist the police drove around in porsches and when you drove to hard they would drive next to you and sign you that you must go slower and they would drive along no tickets no nothing :D
These speed cameras are a shameless money-grab. Here in America, the government contracts the speed cameras out, and the contractors get sometimes up to half of the revenue from every ticket.
in Phoenix, AZ they have lots of speed cameras but they have all been turned off in the last few months cuz it was decided they were a violation of peopls rights or something.
i think the cameras are there to increase fuel sales,stress carbon monoxide poisoning,evil laughter etc before them i drove the safest when focusing on the road not the speed,but these days its stop start ,stop start at 5mph at best and i find it hard to concentrate as im so stressed also anxious about hedge hogs catching up and killing them selves on my wheels due to how slow it is, finally when there is abit of life its a case of sod the cameras, the fine is totally worth it then go insane :S
James May says, "cameras don't catch, drunk, drug or uninsured drivers if they say in the speed limit!" No really!? What sort of bizarre non-point is that? That's like saying we shouldn't have hand gun laws because it doesn't effectively stop shoplifting.
@CarrierBagHead, he does have a point as their are more dangerous things then speeding, least when your speeding you have control of your car where if your drink or drug driving.... well Im sorry but your the reason why crashes happen.
At 1:48 the host accuses the 'people who like speed cameras' of "telling us that 33% of all FATALITIES are caused by excessive.. speed.." at 2:00 he states that "the facts is"... theTransport Research Authority found that 7% of ACCIDENTS are caused by speed. These facts don't contradict each other however they were presented in a context implying they do.
para estos tipos el 70 por ciento de la calidad de un coche se reduce a la velocidad maxima y caballos , lo prueban a tope exigiendole el maximo cuando en la realidad no es asi , deberian de parar y pensar como utilizan las personas normalmente su coche??
46 persons are mad vegetarians on bicycles!!
funkyy6 4 months ago 2
Mad vegetarians on bicycles... Lmfao.
aymthebest 5 months ago 5
THE CAMERAS ARE NOT A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO ANYTHING! They are merely a realization of an Orwellian world!!! Stop big government! Stop the spying! WE HAVE RIGHTS AS HUMAN BEINGS!
DjRjSolarStar 8 months ago 5
watch this video all you speeders..if you dare .its called Give us a Flash on Bombarinos channel.
bombarino 9 months ago
@bombarino shameless self-promotion is for retarded faggots
hejjagedu 6 months ago
@hejjagedu Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
bombarino 6 months ago
The same thing that happened with Gun Control happened with speed cameras. Whats the answer?
The US of A!
TheLastMag 10 months ago
speed cameras = Bullshit
Tiberiusize 1 year ago 25
In America, we don't have speed cameras... so we can speed when we either have a radar detector, know where the cops are, when you don't see any cops, and if you know where to speed... In America, only idiots get pulled over for speeding.
bigjohnf71 1 year ago 5
@bigjohnf71 So your saying a lot of americans get pulled over for speeding then ^_^
Sorry had to. It was too easy a joke to just let slide.
Lostfaith1980 10 months ago
what season and episode is this?
Volodeas 1 year ago
fuck speed cameras, fuck speed limits, em driving as fast as i want to :)
have a good night
patrickkroell 1 year ago
Leave it to Clarkson to criticize and moan about everything that prevents him from driving 200mph everywhere he damn well wishes to.
3timeloser3 1 year ago
@3timeloser3 You mean criticise a system of cameras meant to make money and not save lives?
Conscars 1 year ago 2
Speed cameras in the UK are a joke. They are huge, orange boxes that u can see from miles away and even mobile speed cameras are pretty obvious.
I head there is a law that prevents police from hiding the cameras. Is that the truth?
Molo9000 1 year ago 2
@Molo9000 Yes, the point is not to fine a lot of people. It is to get them to slow down. Therefore the more visible they will get more people to slow down when they see them, and that way avoiding accidents, or decreasing the risk of massive injures because of the lowered speed.
dude2106 1 year ago
The government will do anything to rob people off their money!
What this proves is nothing else than that!
like they robbed the students money early this year and still are about to!
saznrai 1 year ago 3
I live in uk for five-year and I have no licence or insurance. I speed on same camera every day sometime I drunk... I never been caught...lol fuck uk police lol lol
gymcredible 1 year ago
@gymcredible if you live in uk for 5 years now shouldn't you be better at talking and typing in english
taserking1 1 year ago
43 mad vegetarians watched this video
FormulaOneFan4Eva 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't give a shit about your son playing football!!!
cheeksinoxford 1 year ago
I am from Croatia and the same things happens here.
mkrajaci 1 year ago
Even if its a revenue generator, and only saves ONE life its done its job. I can't see why people complain about speed cameras. People on the news complaining about them are basically telling the country they wanna speed and get away with it. in what way are they hurting? There is NO negative out come to them unless they are faulty. If your speeding YOUR IN THE WRONG.. its not the cameras fault people stick their foot down to far and ignore the law...
Made4Viol3nce 1 year ago
@Made4Viol3nce
Attitudes like that are why we live in a police state now. NOTHING is more precious than freedom (and independence) - And that includes the freedom to be at risk or do risky things.
If we were dying out, you might have a point. But as it is, we are teetering on the brink of collapse as this rock can not support 6.5 billion properly. And you want to keep more alive? You're insane (& a touchy-feely liberal - the bane of society and of freedom).
usquanigo 1 year ago
@usquanigo
this rock can't support 6.5bn people. is that your own opinion? have you done any research on the matter? this planet could easily support another 50bn with space left over. just cos the oil's gonna dry up in a couple decades and the atmosphere's warming up doesn't mean the population's gonna level out. don't get me wrong, i'd love it if the cylons were to come and nuke the place but that's just wishful thinking.
t47i 1 year ago
@t47i You you pull a number out of your ass while trying to sound authoritative. People require infrastructure. There are not enough resources to even come close to your fantasy #s. What you don't know, is that, ignoring infrastructure, without GE crops, we could only feed 4 billion at MOST. We are struggling to scrape by with 6.5. We're managing that only because of aquifers which are being drained FAST. Food, water, energy, & raw materials are in too short supply for much more than we have.
usquanigo 1 year ago
@usquanigo There is a very simple answer to that, Genocide.
TLaitharex 1 year ago
@usquanigo well of course. you're welcome to believe those things if that's what you've read or been told but i suggest you think about it a little. not enough crops? grow more in massive factories. not enough water? desalination plants. energy / i take it you mean electricity. nuclear fusion/fission/wind/solar/any or all of the thousands of techniques. i don't have the planet's mineral manifest with me right now but let's say for now that you're right. there's no iron left. one word. asteroids
t47i 1 year ago
@t47i Here we go again. lol No real study on your part, but you pulled a # out of your ass, & feel the need to defend it, so the posturing begins.
Desalination is expensive on many fronts, & WILL eventually upset the salinity of the ocean # be a total disaster.
"Massive factories" don't solve the problem of food growth. If they did, Bourlag wouldn't have to work so hard. (not to mention meat)
Asteroids? We can't even get to Mars right now.
To say nothing of other infrastucture needs.
usquanigo 1 year ago
@usquanigo you're obsessed with my arse. admit it. you wish it was your hand up there don't you? desalination is expensive. sure but we're talking about survival of billions of people. don't you think it's worth it? if you can't think of the solution to upsetting the salinity of the oceans then you're an idiot. so growing more food doesn't solve the problem of not enough food. i take that back about you being an idiot. you're a retard and you can't think for yourself. you read nasa news much?
t47i 1 year ago
@t47i People like you astound me. Factories don't produce food, brilliance. And despite your lack of understanding of the real issues and dangers of population, you are so programmed by your society that you are compelled to lash out against anyone that doesn't support increasing it further. You just can't help yourself, can you? How quickly you turned to personal insults - AFTER first making things up. That says it all.
usquanigo 1 year ago
@t47i baby how old are you?? because you seemed like a 12 years old... no,, 8 years old... all the solution are possible... but why it isnt any??? the side effects are too devastating... cut our forests, oxygen resources for crops??? do you know how much water used to grow a single cattle? and how long all the waste recycled? humanity will vanish before the world come back into its good old condition... asteroid? come on,, we will die before we able to mine it... pfffft... liberals...
indonesiarayas2 1 year ago
@t47i That is stupid.
The planet is far too small for 10 billion.
TLaitharex 1 year ago
it's too small for 2 billion but we have 3.4 times that figure...
FormulaOneFan4Eva 1 year ago
@usquanigo killing people isn't really the answer to an over population on this "rock"..Birth control would suit better. Not that i agree with your opinion, being on the brink of collapse. Love how your flaming my attitude haha good one. Attitudes like yours, thinking of yourself and not others is whats wrong with this world. Sure risk your own life, but when others are involved there needs to be boundaries. I can tell whats in your head. ME>EVERYTHING ELSE. Assume you'll just read "blah blah"
Made4Viol3nce 1 year ago
@Made4Viol3nce the way to get the populatioin to stop going up is to get the extremely poverished out of povity, then they'll stop having 10 kids per family. course, birth control's a good idea too. official projections are 10bn by 2050. if bill gates has anything to do with it it'll be a lot less. YT search "bill gates vaccines". scary!
t47i 1 year ago
@Made4Viol3nce Not necessarilly the law itself is wrong, it's the camera's lack of discretion or tolerance. 60 ok, but if you stray over to 61 and pass by a speed camera, you get points on your license. Speed limits themselves are not in question here, the criteria used by speed cameras is the problem. I've never heard of a throttle or a car that can maintain a steady speed 100% of the time on a road. Physics and momentum will always stray a moving vehicle a bit more or less the desired speed.
edersiomoran 10 months ago
fuck you fucking thiefs you won't get my money, suck my dick, i am anonymous
Latengodesmesurada 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LORD JESUS IS KING OF ALL WORLD!
bass109 1 year ago
looooooooooool he said I can be high on magic mushroms on a stolen nissan daaaaamn he is awesome I have a feeling that he get's high probably on weed and get drunk all the time and eat magic mushrom XD
nerotomas 1 year ago
Well thay have effects here in the states
popscoop12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey youtube peeps, check out my bill cosby impression and tell me what you think, I really appreciate the feed back thanks.
MrPurple0 1 year ago
43 People from the Road Authorities saw this
petet285 1 year ago 74
if you want speedcamera's come to belgium, we got the most in the world -_-
whiteraider 1 year ago
And you can't blame the local councils for this either as they don't get a penny of the revenue,phantom is so right,people are getting more stupid then ever.
brumster01 1 year ago
damn in USA there is a damn camera on every damn stoplight >.<
camargo2012 1 year ago
I like Hammond's leather jacket!!
StopManMotion 1 year ago
Stop film @ 2:08
Thomazzo131195 1 year ago
@Thomazzo131195 I don't see anything special at 2:08
masteryoda394 1 year ago
@masteryoda394 I don't know anymore what I meant to see. Weird. Sorry
Thomazzo131195 1 year ago
@Thomazzo131195 It happens,don't worry about it.
masteryoda394 1 year ago
@masteryoda394 Okay then. I forget many things, so this isn't very rare to me :P
Thomazzo131195 1 year ago
I remember Clarkson once said ''Speed has never killed anyone................................Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what kills ya''
GOD 1 year ago 3
Hm. I am not sure what point the Top Gear guys are trying to make. I see it as an excellent way to raise money. Why not? We need to get money from somewhere, so instead of raising taxes, we can get it from people who break the traffic rules. Simple. And people have a choice.
nigredoalbedorubedo 1 year ago
Pause at 0:25.
Gotta love Jeremy's facial expressiveness hahaha =).
iVanHalen666 1 year ago
Speeding may be only 7 percent of all car deaths, that doesn't mean it's against the law. So they make 70 million pounds for the government. Stop speeding and that won't be a problem either.
Also @phant0mh0b0, you hit the kid at 25, he gets hurt. You hit the kid at 50, he's dead.
Hanser 1 year ago
@Hanser Kid doesn't run into the street without looking, kid doesn't get hurt, or killed for that matter. I'm not saying the speeder is innocent. I'm just saying to open your eyes and realize the kid could've avoided getting hurt altogether.
Just because it's a kid, a pedestrian isn't exempt from traffic laws. Jaywalking included.
I'm sure you can understand that, if you let go of the emotional and moral bias supporting the child, and look at it logically.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
Man, I love being an American.
You always know exactly who's screwing you over and why.
AFLoneWolf 1 year ago
I live in Hong Kong. Most of the cinema not hiding, but they have a sign telling drive to slow down so that they voluntary obey the the law. Of course, the police here also has hidden cinema in highway.
In here, drunk driving and drug driving are more common to cause death.
applesweeter 1 year ago
Speed has never killed anybody, it's instantly becoming stationary that kills.
turbobk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It makes me sad that the Stig was actually writing a book the whole time. I would never turn my back on a 350 million viewer program. FUCKER
OnEdEcKhk 1 year ago 73
@OnEdEcKhk
he wasnt writing the book the entire time.
xliver4 1 year ago
@OnEdEcKhk
Hanging is too good for him.
camcoop25 1 year ago
I don't think many people were in any doubt that it was a form of taxation when they started springing up. Most police forces have quotas now on traffic cop activity as it is a source of revenue for them.
TheSpankymonkey 1 year ago
This is so not USA, this is so NOT FARE search:
homaidan alturki is alone
globaldot 1 year ago
how come theres no seats for the audience?
KurdPro77 1 year ago
@KurdPro77
did you EVER watch top gear before???
ssj2Nesa 1 year ago
@ssj2Nesa no i wish i had it but i dont.
KurdPro77 1 year ago
@KurdPro77 yea they always stand, they move around a bit when they bring cars in and do other stunts, or move to another area to look at something etc
qmelian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KurdPro77
THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP
ssj2Nesa 1 year ago
time to take a bat to all of your cameras. the time is now.
kroovyandcal 1 year ago
its all about the money.
Xraller 1 year ago
Sort of related, I heard a radio discussion regarding "Red light" cameras in the USA. Which said there was mounting pressure to remove them and many States were possibly in the process of doing so.
The reason being that it was un-constitutional as it shifted the emphaise from the police authority proving that you had broken the law to the individual having to prove that they had not.
I thought it was interesting and I'm fairly sure that would count for speed cameras as well.
purpleeddie7 1 year ago
kill em all. let those former imperialists run over each other. once an imperialist always an imperialist.
ChesterDoraemon 1 year ago
Hmm, I don't even know anything about cars, and I'm starting to looove this show!
Trevguy00 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I live in Arizona, and we have used "Photo-Radar" all across the State, but recently, turned them OFF...!
Even when AZ (USA) can't balance the State Budget, Photo-Radar is not an option.... It turns out, "Photo-Radar" is not a "Money-Maker".
Overall, the Court's Legal cost (legally serving summons in the U.S.), IS enough to end this STUPID crap... until I'm sent a 'Certified Summons for Court', I haven't been properly Summoned.....
kaswack 1 year ago
I live in Arizona, and we have used "Photo-Radar" all across the State, but recently, turned them OFF...!
Even when AZ (USA) can't balance the State Budget, Photo-Radar is not an option.... It turns out, "Photo-Radar" is not a "Money-Maker".
Overall, the Court's Legal cost (legally serving summons in the U.S.), IS enough to end this STUPID crap... until I'm sent a 'Certified Summons for Court', I haven't been properly Summoned.....
kaswack 1 year ago
they are raising revenue.
jawbone83 1 year ago
now they have "safety cameras" which are red light and speed cameras in one, so if u decide that u cant safely stop at the yellow, and would be safer if you accelerate a little to get through,, you;ll get a little ticket.
kamakaze2007 1 year ago
SCHUPID MOPPETS!!!!!
ku42 1 year ago
well i think the gov is playing smart over there, more money to them with fines because poor judgement cause accidents not speeding.
ChickenCritters 1 year ago
Speed cameras in my opinion is for alertness ? So people will focus on the road and there speed maybe? Nobody wants to get a ticket... So yeah!
And, speed cameras are a good fund for fat blokes :D
1337NoFear1337 1 year ago
revenue revenue revenue
stormthorgerson 1 year ago
thanks for exposing the real motive behind this nonsense.
rallynut78 1 year ago
if you get caught speeding speed up and make the most of your money !!!
squedhead 1 year ago
Top Gear is the Top Show in the World...
911ShikoX 1 year ago
lol! i like it..
SaadvorteX 1 year ago
If it werent for the speed camera's I'd be paying a lot more taxes... I drive about 250km's a day and I refuse to drive any faster to make up time lost by traffic and informed my employer about that.
britewired 1 year ago
i like to go fast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fuckitandfuckyou 1 year ago
Uk shud do like Germany No Speed Limit in the motorway and just camera to check the traffics
Brian5291 1 year ago
Most accident don't even occur because of speeding. It has to do with poor judgment in other areas; driving vs. when to turn or catching a car in a blind spot when trying to switch lanes. Hell. I've seen a girlfriend run over her boyfriend while they were drunk having fun in the car in a Wendy's parking lot.
A stupid camera may raise money in fines, but isn't going to do shit when trying to save lives. Some people should not even be issued a license in the first place.
Dsaubt 1 year ago
Guys..relax.. It's not about how fast you drive. It's about how fast you can brake.. how fast your reaction time is.
SkItkAt 1 year ago
Its not the speed that does it is the speed camera that does it.
iamgreatboss1 1 year ago
a stupid driver could kill well below the speed limit.
ruhulaminutube 1 year ago 2
Speeding doesn't kill people. Soccer moms in minivans and tiny-dicked guys in oversized black SUVs kill people.
witchdoctor88 1 year ago
@witchdoctor88 and junkies in their junk old cars with loud exhausts and 100 HP engines under the hood!
4x4PROX 1 year ago
Speeding doesn't kill people, stupid motherfuckers speeding kill people!
dienpa 1 year ago
It's simply a revenue generator. But try to video record a police officer in the states (specifically Maryland) and they will arrest you.
cbrROMAD 1 year ago 20
@cbrROMAD You not allowed to videotape anyone without their consent.
thedrizzle09 1 year ago
@thedrizzle09 In Britain you can film police officers when they're on duty, there's no law against it, but they won't be very happy if you do.
liamthomas1664 1 year ago
A guy walks across the road, your doing 40mph, you hit him. Rewind this. A guy walks across the road, your doing 60mph, you pass him.
xBIack 1 year ago 2
speed doesn't kill, women drivers do!
jimimmm 1 year ago
Here in The Netherlands they fine the owner of the car via his number plate. So even if your dog is driving you still can get fined if he is speeding :P
CMETRIQUE 1 year ago
ITS ALL ABOUTS THE MONEY HONEY! they dont give a shit if we die, they CALL it CROWD CONTROL!
ripin4tha2kush0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Money On PayPal:
/watch?v=MFVNKv92NHA
****************************
+3000 Ptz On Lockerz & Invitation Come On
/watch?v=Md5MWvgpbCs
tatut234 1 year ago
for every new speedcamera used, a member of parliament should be run over
masterdurchgriff 1 year ago 2
if everyone would help destroying these damn taxmachine-cameras then politicians would be quicker to remember that a much more simple devise called 'guillotine' can still be used on them too
masterdurchgriff 1 year ago
Speeding doesn't kill. Stupidity does. And No, not just the idiot who was doing 120mph/200kmh down his neighborhood. No no no. I mean the idiot who isn't looking out as he leaves his driveway, or the child who's parents didn't teach him NOT TO RUN INTO THE ROAD. Hell, I could be going 25 in a 25 zone, and if a kid runs out into the road, he's still gonna get hurt. I swear, as people get dumber, the laws get stricter.
(Oh god, better put my flame suit on before the pro-life hippies get me!)
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago 153
@phant0mh0b0 Agree. but its not as people get dumber, the laws get stricter. Its the exact opposite. As the laws get stricter, the people get dumber. Cause people take it for granted that drivers arent suppose to do this and that. They forgot that, for them to not take an extra few steps is easy, for drivers to brake, the driver must be able to react quickly, the brake fluids have to be working properly, the brakes have to be working properly, the tyres must be able to grip the road, etcetc.
Hellvin 1 year ago
@Hellvin Well said, you're actually absolutely right. It's a vicious cycle of people thinking less for themselves. Not to sound like a crazy anti-government anarchist, but really, it does feel like they're trying to reduce our thinking processes one by one.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 hahas, remember remember, the 5th of November, the gunpowder treason and plot.
but seriously speaking, all the stupid laws around are giving advantages to certain sides on given situations like, pedestrians > drivers. This makes it rather unfair to the drivers when there are pedestrians who dont value their lives. However, its not exactly the govt fault. We the people, are all selfish and unwilling to be more thoughtful of someone else, therefore, govt intervenes.
Hellvin 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 here is one simple question genius.
if that child runs out on the road in a 25 zone, with what speed is it more likely to stop in time and not to harm it. 25 or 60?
and will you go up to those parents free of guilt?
nookiex6 1 year ago
Comment removed
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@nookiex6 Here's my answer: The child shouldn't be running into the road in the first place. Just like the car shouldn't have been speeding. Both parties are at fault.
Re-read my comment calmly and you'll see that I'm not condoning speeding. I'm just saying that if the child knew he/she shouldn't run into the road without looking first, then that would be one less traffic-accident. You can't just ignore the child's bad decision (or bad parenting) and blindly point the blame toward the driver.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 You're an idiot. Really. Like you'll have enough time to react to a kid in the road at 120mph rather than 25.
And who the fuck said pedestrians can't be in the road? Kids play in the road. Unless you were trapped in your room playing video games (most likely no friends).
DURP DURP, PHANTOM IS A RETARD, DURPP
tomthedestroyer 1 year ago
@tomthedestroyer I thought parks are for children, ma bad than. Gonna take my vehicle and drive through the park than. USE A GOD DAMN SIDEWALK if you dont want to get run over. Im not for speeding, just against road obstacles such as pedestrians and cyclists (without any license and knowledge of traffic signs/laws).
mediastack 1 year ago 2
@tomthedestroyer
I am not placing blame on either side, because I believe drivers have just as much responsibility to not hit something, regardless of whether it should be there or not. But read the comment again - I said if a child runs into the street, regarding stupidity. The driver shouldn't have been speeding, but the kid shouldn't have ran into the street without looking either. Both parties were stupid.
And really, trying to insult someone personally on the web?
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 Which car will stop faster if it loses control. The one going at 120mph or the one at 25 mph? And no, it's not the idiot losing control, what if the tire blew out due to whatever reason. Which one is likely to survive. Blown out tire at 25mph or at 120mph ? Fucking moron.
StreetMagus 1 year ago
@StreetMagus If you read my post thoroughly, I didn't exactly defend speeding. I am just pointing out that it's not just the guy who was speeding sometimes. But even if that were the case, Speeders are scapegoated often anyway.
I was just saying, regardless of the speed a car is going, a child will get hurt either way if the kid walks out into the street. If someone pulls in front of another car, a collision occurs regardless of speed.
Reading comprehension bro, you might want to learn it.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@StreetMagus Who's driving 120mph? Most cars aren't going to be on a stretch of road way where they can reach that speed. Most people when speeding go anywhere from 5-25mph over the limit. So a 65 zone you an expect a speeder to be trucking 70-90mph. Either way, the option for 25mph is not present on the interstate. And no person in their right mind (unless racing) is going to double the speed limit on a city-town street. That often results in a suspended license and very hefty fines.
tbirdpunk 1 year ago
@StreetMagus you are the dipshit, they go 200mph on the autobahn every god damned day, this is about money, wake up, and for the record keep your old ass in the slow lane
redhot916spd 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
MatthezAustria 1 year ago
Comment removed
MatthezAustria 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 the difference is this easy math: Idiot drives only 25, sees a kid, slows down, and if he still hits the kid, the kid is probably going to be fine, as he will be hit by the car with a speed of let's say 5 km/h. Now the idiot is driving 200. He even doesn't see the kid caus he is too fast. Kid's body splattered in many pieces flying through the air. After 300 meters or so, the idiot steps out of his car, only to tell the parents, it was their fault not his? Who's the idiot?
MatthezAustria 1 year ago
@MatthezAustria You, for misinterpreting my comment just like every other guy responding. I didn't say the driver isn't at fault. Nor did I say the kid dies, Mr. Morbid. I am pointing out what you, just like many other people, seem to be blind to - the fact that children shouldn't be RUNNING INTO THE ROAD in the first place. I clearly stated that the driver is an idiot for speeding there. But the child should've been taught better than to blindly run into the road.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@MatthezAustria Don't you ever forget that humans are NOT EXEMPT from traffic laws, just because they're not in a car. The big problem is that somehow, people think they have the right of way on roads made for cars. That is why everybody blindly persecutes a driver when a car-to-person collision occurs. Nobody ever asks "Was the person following proper safety procedures? Does he even know what a crosswalk is?"
Hence, I'll repeat:
STUPIDITY is what causes accidents, speeding-idiots included.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 Don't worry, as people get dumber, big brother is here to protect them!
dre04mach 1 year ago
@dre04mach Yep.
"Good gracious people are getting hurt when they're illegally crossing the street! Quick Thompson, we need to think of a solu- I GOT IT. WE'LL BAN AUTOMOBILES FROM BEING WITHIN 1000 FEET OF A PERSON."
That, or we need flying cars soon so we can be on a completely different level of elevation from pedestrians.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 100% right!
AhmedAltima08 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 Nice post. I agree with your statements 100%. No need for your flame-suit. Any logical person would agree with you. :)
Yelpats03 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 i guess you can't see the difference between hitting a kid while doing 25 mph and hitting a kid while doing 120 mph...
lazy0frog 1 year ago
@lazy0frog I guess you didn't thoroughly read the comment. So, let me take the comprehension portion out for you.
I didn't say the kid getting hit at 120 mph has no consequence. Nor did I condone said driver's actions. I am simply inferring that the kid has no business being in the road, especially just jumping out, in the first place.
You can't ignore this fact and place 100% blame on the driver, regardless of speed. Traffic laws apply to humans just as much as cars.
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
@phant0mh0b0 True but you can't control every kid that is near the street...sure the kid has no business in the middle of the road ... but weren't you a kid ? how many times your parents told you you have no business with something and you didn't listen?
so if you can't control the kid you try to control the driver with those speed limits....
don't get me wrong i love speed but not at the cost of lives man .... come on
lazy0frog 1 year ago
@lazy0frog I understand your point and of course, I value human lives. I just feel it's not fair when cars and drivers are narrowed out as the bad guy in almost all situations. When you look at it with cold-logic, disregarding any moral bias (like "dawwww it's only a kid!") , Speed isn't the only factor for an accident.
If we keep letting the "mad vegetarians on bicycles" get their way by playing the moral card, we'll soon be outlawed from driving on any road next to a sidewalk at this rate...
phant0mh0b0 1 year ago
Cars and speed doesnt kill. Its Idiots that dont know how to handle cars and speed that kill people!
mkai4492 1 year ago
Yeah...excessive speed doesn't kill much. Earth is revolving the sun at over 30.000 km/h (about 19.000 mph) and I don't see much being killed by it.
SirFancyBubbles 1 year ago
Speed doesn't kill - not watching where you are going kills
VIATG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At the end of his life, the deadliest gunfighter of the Old West is given a choice: Hell or redemption. He chooses redemption and God's Archangel transports him to modern day Los Angeles to serve bloody, frontier justice on the worst dregs of society.
CallMeBillSeries 1 year ago
niccccccccccce
islandvoip 1 year ago
I love this show.....maybe the best in the world
anafimarialip 1 year ago
I love this show.....maybe the best in the world
anafimarialip 1 year ago
that's some quality diagrams there - still awesome show
utopiangem 1 year ago
See video " somebody hates traffic speed cameras"
zzkokko 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good Video
KillerEagle12345 1 year ago
Speed Cameras spoils the freedom of driving your vehicles on the roads...
Worst it effects on highways too.. haha
Every driver has their integrity...
J4Yh7 1 year ago
I wouldn't have a problem with speed cameras if they would just be honest as to what they're there for: To raise revenue from people breaking the law. I mean, think about it: You have to be speeding for them to get you at all (assuming, of course, the camera isn't set for the wrong speed or something), so you have to be in the wrong for them to fine you. But if they say it's for public safety, but don't deploy them in a way to help public safety, that's disingenuous.
Raguleader 1 year ago
Richard Hammond = Cutest man on earth <3
iloveyucinemabizarre 1 year ago
Speed doesn't kill, crashing does!
frostyuk2007 1 year ago 123
@frostyuk2007 psssh guns don't kill either, pulling the trigger does.
MikeyisNinja 1 year ago
@frostyuk2007 you got it wrong retard. It's "Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... That's what gets you" Jeremy Clarkson
aaaapaapt 1 year ago
@ryzeisbest I hate to inform you, but your politicians in Australia also do not give a fig about you.
And, no, I don't live in the Middle East. My politicians here in the US also don't give a fig about me.
Most politicians everywhere only care about their own power.
Perhaps after you turn 29 you will learn that important fact.
freesk8 1 year ago
It's sad how nothing has happened to stop this bullshit. Speed cameras are silly.
appolo112233 1 year ago
shoot them out.....oh wait,right its the UK.......better yet, climb the camera pole and beat it with a baton
dwiggs77 1 year ago
LMMFAO @ "mad vegetarians on bicycles"
Speed cameras are cash cows for the government! I do not believe we have speed cameras here in America yet. Our big thing right now is traffic light cameras to catch people who run red lights. i support those.
knytrydr73 1 year ago
@knytrydr73 give the sods some time and you WILL have these things dotting your roads old son...
they are just their to make MONEY off the motorists nothing more then that!
grahamkeithtodd 1 year ago
@grahamkeithtodd : won't surprise me!
knytrydr73 1 year ago
In de early days when speeds didnt exist the police drove around in porsches and when you drove to hard they would drive next to you and sign you that you must go slower and they would drive along no tickets no nothing :D
Machini18 1 year ago
These speed cameras are a shameless money-grab. Here in America, the government contracts the speed cameras out, and the contractors get sometimes up to half of the revenue from every ticket.
NastyChuck 1 year ago
in Phoenix, AZ they have lots of speed cameras but they have all been turned off in the last few months cuz it was decided they were a violation of peopls rights or something.
ZerstorenMK 1 year ago
i think the cameras are there to increase fuel sales,stress carbon monoxide poisoning,evil laughter etc before them i drove the safest when focusing on the road not the speed,but these days its stop start ,stop start at 5mph at best and i find it hard to concentrate as im so stressed also anxious about hedge hogs catching up and killing them selves on my wheels due to how slow it is, finally when there is abit of life its a case of sod the cameras, the fine is totally worth it then go insane :S
alexg3001 1 year ago
they dont do it for the safety, same thing happens it italy, its just that the goverment wants the money
ATEAMZZZZ90786987645 1 year ago 2
@Rennaaa. You're the type that's incapable of making a sensible counter argument and just resort to lame, random YouTube insults, aren't you?
CarrierBagHead 1 year ago
they are for Revenue raising. No doubt. Like our parents always said. They are a Bunch of Crooks In Coats!. I say down speed cameras!
mraperish 1 year ago
I remember them debating them but i don't remember this with the charts and everything was this allowed o be aired? because ive never seen it
K1TOMK1 1 year ago
w.w.w.youtube.com/watch?v=wnkp2sT8zkg&feature=related
dantezi1984 1 year ago
and a dramatic effect on fast cars sells youtube.com/watch?v=wnkp2sT8zkg&feature=related is the the same guy?
dantezi1984 1 year ago
James May says, "cameras don't catch, drunk, drug or uninsured drivers if they say in the speed limit!" No really!? What sort of bizarre non-point is that? That's like saying we shouldn't have hand gun laws because it doesn't effectively stop shoplifting.
CarrierBagHead 1 year ago
@CarrierBagHead Boy, you're a dumb one, aren't you.
Rennaaa 1 year ago
@CarrierBagHead, he does have a point as their are more dangerous things then speeding, least when your speeding you have control of your car where if your drink or drug driving.... well Im sorry but your the reason why crashes happen.
bogan001 1 year ago
speed cameras are illegal the US :)
superduperzipz 1 year ago 4
At 1:48 the host accuses the 'people who like speed cameras' of "telling us that 33% of all FATALITIES are caused by excessive.. speed.." at 2:00 he states that "the facts is"... theTransport Research Authority found that 7% of ACCIDENTS are caused by speed. These facts don't contradict each other however they were presented in a context implying they do.
GoodResolutions 1 year ago
<---------- look eminem not afraid ( GTA 4 )
TheNeco357 1 year ago
well i guess there're more cars on the road now than in the 60s
squeech707 1 year ago
para estos tipos el 70 por ciento de la calidad de un coche se reduce a la velocidad maxima y caballos , lo prueban a tope exigiendole el maximo cuando en la realidad no es asi , deberian de parar y pensar como utilizan las personas normalmente su coche??
jesusperezamorano 1 year ago
Off with the Queen...
lordphantom6788 1 year ago