Naik conveniently ignores the 3rd and essential part of the shahada which is "I proclaim that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah"
Ask any Imam or Mullah whether one may convert to Islam by taking the first 2 parts of the shahada and omitting the 3rd part. Naik is deliberately trying to mislead the audience into believing that becoming a muslim is as simple as believing in Allah. No. If you dont believe in Muhammad, you can NOT become a muslim. Islam is a cult centred around Muhammad.
Bro don't teach him he is the one who knows every single religion the way he explained all things about the ethiest there was not better explaination that's Wht an atheist means brov actually u don't know Wht is an atheist
@chitrakuut. Becoz Islam is the only religion that believe in all those noble personalities whom people believe they were gods or son of god etc. Islam believe in all of them and make clear that they were all messengers of GOD, representators of GOD. They all came in different times to different regions of the world with same message of GOD, the only one unseen GOD. Why don't u think that GOD doesn't need to come in human form, human is a kind of an animal.
"The old religion said, 'He's an atheist who doesn't believe in God', the new religion says, 'He's an atheist who doesn't believe in himself'" - Swami Vivekananda...
WHAT THE HECK TO YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.MR NAIK SAID THAT ATHEIST DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD WHICH IS THE FIRST PART OF ISLAMIC SAHADAT THEIR IS NO GOD.SIMPLE AS THAT.WHY ITS SO CONFUSING TO YOU.
All such ideas as we can do this,or cannot do that are superstitions.We can do everything.The Vedanta teaches men to have faith in themselves first.As certain religions of the world say that a man who does not believe in a Personal God outside of himself is an atheist,so the Vedanta says,A MAN WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN HIMSELF IS AN ATHEIST.NOT BELIEVING IN THE GLORY OF OUR OWN SOUL IS WHAT THE VEDANTA CALLS ATHEISM.(II.294)
What nonsense. Typical of Hindus, you are redefining well-established words to suit your own ends. Atheism is a well-defined concept. It is non-belief in the supernatural god. Your Ram and Krishna, along with Zeus, Jesus, Allah and all the rest. Most of us atheists do believe in reason, science and rational thinking. The soul is a superstitious idea. Vedanta is stone age ideas that Hindu nationalists cling to and claim as science in desperate need for validation in the modern age.
@Nirmuktavideos Not redefining brother.Veda is far more older then ur Atheism community. Believe it or not .BTW that statement was made by SV.After reading that statement of SV,I stopped believing about Atheism itself :P
@Nirmuktavideos Forgive me friend, but people often end up confusing Eastern and Western definitions of Atheism. In West, ultimate Aim of a man is to reach heaven, in Dharmic religions, ultimate aim is Liberation or Supreme Consciousness. This is what Advaita Vedanta is. Advaita don't believe in forms, names, rituals, dogmas etc. They believe in attainment of Supreme consciousness through meditation or Karma. Every being is equally infinite & divine, one just need to realize that DIVINITY WITHIN
@Nirmuktavideos Those Ram/Krishna etc come from Puranas and their believers are Dualists or Dvaitas. They are ritualists and worship personal Gods. Though they never accept it, but their belief has NO connection with the ancient Vedic Literature. Their faith stem from Puranas and not Vedas. Vedas speak of non-corporeal infinite consciousness called Brahman. And Vedic literature, along with Buddhism, is completely in agreement with modern science including Evolution, Mass energy equivalence etc.
@Nirmuktavideos The ancient Vedic literature is the one to first establish the speed of light as 2202 Yojanam which is 3x10 8 m/s in metric scale. Vedas speak of Consciousness transforming energy to matter and dissolving matter back to energy. This is Einstein's Mass energy equivalence. Today the religion you get to see is a medieval cult which was a death knell to Vedic Science. And mind it, I am no religious man. I have never worshiped any Personal God nor shall I ever do that.
Ignorance, arrogance and taking pride in your heedless views is not an excuse. You say your an atheist, whereas in the Quran it clearly talks about science of matters such as the development of a baby in a mothers womb and more, 1400 years ago, which scientist have only discovered in recent times way after the revelation. Now as far as I know, atheism is based on science. So instead of being completely negligent towards religion, contemplate on the "possible" truth instead of explaining jiberish
Your Quran is full of nonsense. It doesn't say anything meaningful about developmental biology. What you're doing is misappropriating all of modern science using a few vague statements in the book. You can do that with anything, as is evidenced by how the Christians and Hindus also claim that their religious scriptures is contains real science. In truth, you don't have any idea what science is.
Great example of sharpshooter fallacy. You look back and see if anything had been "revealed" before modern science and use that as shady proof that the Quran writers/Allah knew it.
@mkhan6156 just because it talks about a bunch of scientific facts doesn't make it any greater, tell me, can you just read the quaran and build an aeroplane? a rocket? describe quantum mechanics? so keep ur bullshit with yourself.
Naik, sorry, Dr. Naik, does not understand a lot of things. In fact, he does not understand anything as he's only capable of rattling off surahs and verses from different scripture.
If you put a speech by him next to a speech of Deedat you realise he's just a carbon copy. The contents is taken straight from idiots like Bucaille and Yahya.
@nokia5095007 Of course, and all those who dare expose lying Islamic scholars, or con-artist Christians are trying to get views more tha ninform people of their deception! Nao, not really. The problem with you Muslims, is you have a problem with people pointing out dishonesty on the part of your preachers/scholars. For example, if there were an atheist who lied about religion, I'd call him out on him, you on the other hand, will try to ignore the lies perpetuated on your behalf.
I'm pointing out that Muslims and Christians try to make excuses when an atheists shows/exposes an apologist who lies or has misconceptions. Rather than accept that there was a misconception or that an apologist lied, they instead claim the atheist just wants popularity or wants to bash on people.
Zakir Naik is dishonest, any Muslim who values honesty, would realise this and condemn him for it, though I doubt you will, but I have seen Muslims who have.
He has audience of near zero information / knowledge and He knows well how to impress them. I bet He will be kicked out in 2 hour face to face debate with a knowledgeable Atheist. This is the reason he likes to bring in Hindus, Christians and other scholars but never Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.
Dude, you do realise that Zakir is dishonest/lying right? If promotion of Islam via truth/honesty is what you desire, then Zakir Naik shouldn't even be on your list of top 100 preachers. His misconceptions on basic evolution, basic scientific terminology as well as atheism leave much to be desired. Also his position on killing apostates leaves one with a bad taste in in their mouth, as does any other political/religious ideology which promotes the killing of non-adherents.
I've listened to quite a few of his videos, along with the videos of apologists for other religions. You know what happens? Here's a hint: it's not accepting islam.
Ok, times up. What happens is: I laugh at the feeble arguments presented.
@maxmeal "if you listen more of his videos you too will accept islam."
I'll tell you what happened the first time I saw a video of Naik. He was talking about the miracle of the Qur'an stating that the earth was "Egg shaped"(if you mistranslate "flat" and disregard the tafsir, as has become popular in recent years), anyway I thought that odd, because I was sure that both the Greeks and Egyptians had done this ages before Mohammed.
@maxmeal And Lo and behold! A quick google later I bring up the works of Aristotle talking about how we know the world is round from watching its shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse. That was 1000 years before Mohammed was born. Obviously the Qur'an is not miraculous in this respect even though many muslims think so. Naik is either profoundly ignorant about the very subject he's lecturing about or he is lying on purpose. You don't even have to pick one to realize his opinion is worthless.
Well, from what I understand atheism is doing pretty well in India.
Google: The Atheist Centre India Also you might want to read about Gora on the atheist Centre web site. India made a postal stamp commemorating his life. A high honor.
He congratulates the atheist for not following their religion blindly. Ask Zakir what religion the children must be FORCED into if the religion of the mother was not Islam but the husband's was.Tell him what the penalty for apostacy from Islam is...Aahaha. Just remove the second part of the shahada "There is no god...", and you see dear Muslim, you are half way to being an atheist! XD Half your job is done!
Nice one Ajita. I wonder, where are the women in that audience?? And I feel sorry for the gullible fool who asked the question, swallowing Naik's nonsense hook, line and sinker.
@boulevardboy Why is baba ramdev conman?? How is he misleading the people? He is not even a godman or religious preacher. He's into yoga and ayurveda. And I have myself benefited from these ancient sciences like millions of others (including people from the advanced, developed, highly educated world). Yoga and Ayurveda are not same as religion - they are a science (even if not proper science by modern standards) which do help and benefit people's health.
@seasonedsevencolors he claims to have a cure for every disease and recommends his shitty juices isn't that misleading? stop taking any pill that has been prepared by 'western'/science based medicines when you claim you have been cured of any ailment by using the 'ancient' pills/ methods
@boulevardboy Did I ever say that I do not believe in Allopathy or that Ayurveda is the only solution?? No. Then why're you challenging me to stop using allopathic meds? In some cases, however, I've myself experienced and also read/ heard others responding better to ayurvedic meds than any other.
As for ramdev's such claims - I agree with you - it's naive of him to claim anything like that. Still, I wouldn't put him in same list as other totally 'dhongi' babas like sai baba etc.
@seasonedsevencolors mr. ramdev is a charlatan and he often mixes his physical exercises with religious chants and unwanted nationalism from the stage he uses and he ought to be included in that list.. please dont use the word 'ALLOPATHY' thats an insult to the modern medicine/science based medicine.Your statement that people respond better to ayurvedic HERBS than the conventional drugs is an over exaggerated claim to which there is a lot of religious bias attached
@boulevardboy You got me wrong again - I never implied it as a fact that all people respond better to herbal treats; I only meant many do.
While I'm against any religious exaggerations, mixing it with politics and hyper-nationalism, I'm NOT against people peacefully practicing & celebrating their religion and culture. Mixing yoga with religious chants is no issue with me, as long as they don't force it on others and don't blow up others in its name.
@seasonedsevencolors well then may be the episodes which i have seen are those which were the only ones full of aggressive nationalism and overt religious chants and as far as i can comprehend aggressive nationalism and religious fanaticism equals fascism and that needs to be clipped.
It's hard to imagine Naik being so stupid that he doesn't get what being an atheist entails. My guess he's just a regular conman who lies for a living. I'm sure he makes a hell of a lot of money doing what he does.
look full video on youtube this is edited and many main point are removed jst for critising
sudhirsafi 5 days ago
He does make a valid point in the beginning. But when you talk about Zakir, you know bullshit is not fuckin far away.
aaqucnaona94 2 weeks ago
Naik conveniently ignores the 3rd and essential part of the shahada which is "I proclaim that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah"
Ask any Imam or Mullah whether one may convert to Islam by taking the first 2 parts of the shahada and omitting the 3rd part. Naik is deliberately trying to mislead the audience into believing that becoming a muslim is as simple as believing in Allah. No. If you dont believe in Muhammad, you can NOT become a muslim. Islam is a cult centred around Muhammad.
SundriedAtheist 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Why dont u see this before posting such absurdity? wat ch?v = SKe A W ob p9 dY
addicted2utube1 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@addicted2utube1
Before making absurd links to videos which appear inaccessible, you should post your criticism in comment?
TurboDally 1 month ago
omg these kinds of people exist in my country (the channel owner) thats awesome, we need more channels like these, and u sir really cool
nextblain 2 months ago
Good job, idiots like him need ridiculing.
TheLogicalKey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what hell is this Dr zakir naik is very intelligent person
9320imran 4 months ago
what hell is this Dr zakir naik is very intellegent person
9320imran 4 months ago
Excellent video and Analysis........ well done
lokenath123 4 months ago
Bro don't teach him he is the one who knows every single religion the way he explained all things about the ethiest there was not better explaination that's Wht an atheist means brov actually u don't know Wht is an atheist
pakhtonn1 6 months ago
@chitrakuut. Becoz Islam is the only religion that believe in all those noble personalities whom people believe they were gods or son of god etc. Islam believe in all of them and make clear that they were all messengers of GOD, representators of GOD. They all came in different times to different regions of the world with same message of GOD, the only one unseen GOD. Why don't u think that GOD doesn't need to come in human form, human is a kind of an animal.
MrMuzgemini 7 months ago
"The old religion said, 'He's an atheist who doesn't believe in God', the new religion says, 'He's an atheist who doesn't believe in himself'" - Swami Vivekananda...
darklord2314 7 months ago
Exactly! Religions cannot all be right, but they can all be wrong
Hairysteed 8 months ago
WHAT THE HECK TO YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.MR NAIK SAID THAT ATHEIST DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD WHICH IS THE FIRST PART OF ISLAMIC SAHADAT THEIR IS NO GOD.SIMPLE AS THAT.WHY ITS SO CONFUSING TO YOU.
hotmohilapoliceA 8 months ago
Dude stop and come to Islam. Zakir Naik talks logic. Do not die without being Muslim.
seekknowledge2010 8 months ago
All such ideas as we can do this,or cannot do that are superstitions.We can do everything.The Vedanta teaches men to have faith in themselves first.As certain religions of the world say that a man who does not believe in a Personal God outside of himself is an atheist,so the Vedanta says,A MAN WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN HIMSELF IS AN ATHEIST.NOT BELIEVING IN THE GLORY OF OUR OWN SOUL IS WHAT THE VEDANTA CALLS ATHEISM.(II.294)
19Rizz 9 months ago
@19Rizz
What nonsense. Typical of Hindus, you are redefining well-established words to suit your own ends. Atheism is a well-defined concept. It is non-belief in the supernatural god. Your Ram and Krishna, along with Zeus, Jesus, Allah and all the rest. Most of us atheists do believe in reason, science and rational thinking. The soul is a superstitious idea. Vedanta is stone age ideas that Hindu nationalists cling to and claim as science in desperate need for validation in the modern age.
Nirmuktavideos 9 months ago 9
@Nirmuktavideos Not redefining brother.Veda is far more older then ur Atheism community. Believe it or not .BTW that statement was made by SV.After reading that statement of SV,I stopped believing about Atheism itself :P
19Rizz 8 months ago
@Nirmuktavideos Forgive me friend, but people often end up confusing Eastern and Western definitions of Atheism. In West, ultimate Aim of a man is to reach heaven, in Dharmic religions, ultimate aim is Liberation or Supreme Consciousness. This is what Advaita Vedanta is. Advaita don't believe in forms, names, rituals, dogmas etc. They believe in attainment of Supreme consciousness through meditation or Karma. Every being is equally infinite & divine, one just need to realize that DIVINITY WITHIN
darklord2314 7 months ago
@Nirmuktavideos Those Ram/Krishna etc come from Puranas and their believers are Dualists or Dvaitas. They are ritualists and worship personal Gods. Though they never accept it, but their belief has NO connection with the ancient Vedic Literature. Their faith stem from Puranas and not Vedas. Vedas speak of non-corporeal infinite consciousness called Brahman. And Vedic literature, along with Buddhism, is completely in agreement with modern science including Evolution, Mass energy equivalence etc.
darklord2314 7 months ago
@Nirmuktavideos The ancient Vedic literature is the one to first establish the speed of light as 2202 Yojanam which is 3x10 8 m/s in metric scale. Vedas speak of Consciousness transforming energy to matter and dissolving matter back to energy. This is Einstein's Mass energy equivalence. Today the religion you get to see is a medieval cult which was a death knell to Vedic Science. And mind it, I am no religious man. I have never worshiped any Personal God nor shall I ever do that.
darklord2314 7 months ago
First of All Zakir is A Joker ....HE is actually Joker Naik.
19Rizz 9 months ago
Ignorance, arrogance and taking pride in your heedless views is not an excuse. You say your an atheist, whereas in the Quran it clearly talks about science of matters such as the development of a baby in a mothers womb and more, 1400 years ago, which scientist have only discovered in recent times way after the revelation. Now as far as I know, atheism is based on science. So instead of being completely negligent towards religion, contemplate on the "possible" truth instead of explaining jiberish
mkhan6156 9 months ago
@mkhan6156
Your Quran is full of nonsense. It doesn't say anything meaningful about developmental biology. What you're doing is misappropriating all of modern science using a few vague statements in the book. You can do that with anything, as is evidenced by how the Christians and Hindus also claim that their religious scriptures is contains real science. In truth, you don't have any idea what science is.
Nirmuktavideos 9 months ago 12
@Nirmuktavideos - Zakir Naik and his Audiences " In an assembly of Donkeys only the Mule seems to be the
Pundit ".
MrMilitantviper 7 months ago 3
@mkhan6156
Great example of sharpshooter fallacy. You look back and see if anything had been "revealed" before modern science and use that as shady proof that the Quran writers/Allah knew it.
AceofDlamonds 2 months ago
@mkhan6156 just because it talks about a bunch of scientific facts doesn't make it any greater, tell me, can you just read the quaran and build an aeroplane? a rocket? describe quantum mechanics? so keep ur bullshit with yourself.
nextblain 1 month ago
Naik, sorry, Dr. Naik, does not understand a lot of things. In fact, he does not understand anything as he's only capable of rattling off surahs and verses from different scripture.
If you put a speech by him next to a speech of Deedat you realise he's just a carbon copy. The contents is taken straight from idiots like Bucaille and Yahya.
So all you can do is chuckle - and ignore.
StopSpamming1 9 months ago
I wonder how this guy ever passed medical school? I would never go to him even if I have a minor headache.
statickk14 10 months ago 20
@109faraz: Did your Zakir Naik teach you manners or this language?
asdibutt 1 year ago
u people just want to increase views on your videos thats it
nokia5095007 1 year ago
@nokia5095007 Of course, and all those who dare expose lying Islamic scholars, or con-artist Christians are trying to get views more tha ninform people of their deception! Nao, not really. The problem with you Muslims, is you have a problem with people pointing out dishonesty on the part of your preachers/scholars. For example, if there were an atheist who lied about religion, I'd call him out on him, you on the other hand, will try to ignore the lies perpetuated on your behalf.
TurboDally 1 year ago
@TurboDally sorry to say all human are not same please try to understand this fact
nokia5095007 1 year ago
@nokia5095007
I'm pointing out that Muslims and Christians try to make excuses when an atheists shows/exposes an apologist who lies or has misconceptions. Rather than accept that there was a misconception or that an apologist lied, they instead claim the atheist just wants popularity or wants to bash on people.
Zakir Naik is dishonest, any Muslim who values honesty, would realise this and condemn him for it, though I doubt you will, but I have seen Muslims who have.
TurboDally 1 year ago
He has audience of near zero information / knowledge and He knows well how to impress them. I bet He will be kicked out in 2 hour face to face debate with a knowledgeable Atheist. This is the reason he likes to bring in Hindus, Christians and other scholars but never Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.
asdibutt 1 year ago
@asdibutt k challenge him then y u bark like dog
108faraz 1 year ago
@asdibutt bring ur so called scholar lets see i will give u the address go to irf.net then challenge him..
108faraz 1 year ago
@108faraz
We will take up this challenge if it comes through proper sources. Please do write to us at 'info at nirmukta dot com'. Thanks.
Nirmuktavideos 1 year ago
Zakir Naik is a propaganda artist.
logicbloke 1 year ago
Who ever uploaded this video. Insha Allah. May Allah give you the true path. if you listen more of his videos you too will accept islam.
maxmeal 1 year ago
@maxmeal
Dude, you do realise that Zakir is dishonest/lying right? If promotion of Islam via truth/honesty is what you desire, then Zakir Naik shouldn't even be on your list of top 100 preachers. His misconceptions on basic evolution, basic scientific terminology as well as atheism leave much to be desired. Also his position on killing apostates leaves one with a bad taste in in their mouth, as does any other political/religious ideology which promotes the killing of non-adherents.
TurboDally 1 year ago
@maxmeal
I've listened to quite a few of his videos, along with the videos of apologists for other religions. You know what happens? Here's a hint: it's not accepting islam.
Ok, times up. What happens is: I laugh at the feeble arguments presented.
sakar181 1 year ago
@maxmeal "if you listen more of his videos you too will accept islam."
I'll tell you what happened the first time I saw a video of Naik. He was talking about the miracle of the Qur'an stating that the earth was "Egg shaped"(if you mistranslate "flat" and disregard the tafsir, as has become popular in recent years), anyway I thought that odd, because I was sure that both the Greeks and Egyptians had done this ages before Mohammed.
Gnomefro 1 year ago
@maxmeal And Lo and behold! A quick google later I bring up the works of Aristotle talking about how we know the world is round from watching its shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse. That was 1000 years before Mohammed was born. Obviously the Qur'an is not miraculous in this respect even though many muslims think so. Naik is either profoundly ignorant about the very subject he's lecturing about or he is lying on purpose. You don't even have to pick one to realize his opinion is worthless.
Gnomefro 1 year ago
Well, from what I understand atheism is doing pretty well in India.
Google: The Atheist Centre India Also you might want to read about Gora on the atheist Centre web site. India made a postal stamp commemorating his life. A high honor.
KasparHauser5 1 year ago
Great rebuttal. You can only pity the audience 70% of which I bet, don't even understand what that lying idiot Naik says in the first place.
9886635574 1 year ago
He congratulates the atheist for not following their religion blindly. Ask Zakir what religion the children must be FORCED into if the religion of the mother was not Islam but the husband's was.Tell him what the penalty for apostacy from Islam is...Aahaha. Just remove the second part of the shahada "There is no god...", and you see dear Muslim, you are half way to being an atheist! XD Half your job is done!
TurboDally 1 year ago
Nice one Ajita. I wonder, where are the women in that audience?? And I feel sorry for the gullible fool who asked the question, swallowing Naik's nonsense hook, line and sinker.
unsorted1138 1 year ago
greatest conmen of india
1.zakir naik
2.puttaparthi sai baba
3.baba ramdev
4.mata amrutamayi
5.kalki bhagwan
this might be a small one hope ppl add more to the list
boulevardboy 1 year ago 11
@boulevardboy - 6. nithyananda 7. mother teressa
9886635574 1 year ago 2
@boulevardboy Why is baba ramdev conman?? How is he misleading the people? He is not even a godman or religious preacher. He's into yoga and ayurveda. And I have myself benefited from these ancient sciences like millions of others (including people from the advanced, developed, highly educated world). Yoga and Ayurveda are not same as religion - they are a science (even if not proper science by modern standards) which do help and benefit people's health.
seasonedsevencolors 2 months ago
@seasonedsevencolors he claims to have a cure for every disease and recommends his shitty juices isn't that misleading? stop taking any pill that has been prepared by 'western'/science based medicines when you claim you have been cured of any ailment by using the 'ancient' pills/ methods
boulevardboy 2 months ago
@boulevardboy Did I ever say that I do not believe in Allopathy or that Ayurveda is the only solution?? No. Then why're you challenging me to stop using allopathic meds? In some cases, however, I've myself experienced and also read/ heard others responding better to ayurvedic meds than any other.
As for ramdev's such claims - I agree with you - it's naive of him to claim anything like that. Still, I wouldn't put him in same list as other totally 'dhongi' babas like sai baba etc.
seasonedsevencolors 2 months ago
@seasonedsevencolors mr. ramdev is a charlatan and he often mixes his physical exercises with religious chants and unwanted nationalism from the stage he uses and he ought to be included in that list.. please dont use the word 'ALLOPATHY' thats an insult to the modern medicine/science based medicine.Your statement that people respond better to ayurvedic HERBS than the conventional drugs is an over exaggerated claim to which there is a lot of religious bias attached
boulevardboy 2 months ago
@boulevardboy You got me wrong again - I never implied it as a fact that all people respond better to herbal treats; I only meant many do.
While I'm against any religious exaggerations, mixing it with politics and hyper-nationalism, I'm NOT against people peacefully practicing & celebrating their religion and culture. Mixing yoga with religious chants is no issue with me, as long as they don't force it on others and don't blow up others in its name.
seasonedsevencolors 2 months ago
@seasonedsevencolors well then may be the episodes which i have seen are those which were the only ones full of aggressive nationalism and overt religious chants and as far as i can comprehend aggressive nationalism and religious fanaticism equals fascism and that needs to be clipped.
boulevardboy 2 months ago
I wonder how this guy has a Dr. infront of him
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
@mcmadbat3 hey dont be shocked u'll find more than 95% of such wonderful ppl with Dr. in front of their names (includes only M.B.,B.S) in india
boulevardboy 1 year ago
It's hard to imagine Naik being so stupid that he doesn't get what being an atheist entails. My guess he's just a regular conman who lies for a living. I'm sure he makes a hell of a lot of money doing what he does.
Gnomefro 1 year ago