Added: 4 years ago
From: Carscom
Views: 141,074
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (259)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the engine on the 2005-2010 Chrysler 300C

    Engine

    2.7 L EER V6

    3.5 L EGG V6

    5.7 L EZB HEMI V8

    6.1 L ESF HEMI V8

    3.0 L OM642 turbodiesel V6

  • if u clicked on this vid from the crash test of this car, u better hope u wont get t boned

  • the 2005-2010 Chrysler 300C was assembled in

    Brampton, Ontario, Canada

    Graz, Austria

    Beijing, China

  • This guy is an idiot.. people buy the car for the looks and engine. The car is way more comfortable and nice inside than he says it is...

  • This car is te best of the world. I love this car

  • fuck this car

    

  • wat does C stand for from 300C?

  • @8747800 =charged

  • @8747800 it was originally a year letter,C was 1955.I don't think it has a meaning anymore.It certainly doesn't mean charged as around the world the C has a diesel as well as a hemi.Only USA Cs come with hemi only.

  • @mahatmacoatmahandbag thanks for the info :)

  • @XTheBrazilianGodX

    This model had the AWD, the RWD are the same :p

  • Okay, buy the side airbags you cheap bastard. And what bulky plastic? The dash board is made out of a soft touch material!

  • this man made me cry i don't know why?

  • @3BOOOODY1 me to Budy , tomorow i going to my Doctor i feel very Bad.

  • yeah... fucking quick

  • This car still gives you the aaaaah affect, when it drives by.

  • Great review, love it!

  • Am 19 from el paso tx and i think this car is really Cool am getting one soon with a 3500 watts sound system ......with 22s cromed

  • @Armenproductionz

    theres alot of these driving around el paso these days :\

  • my dad has the 250hp v6 and that motherfucker gets from 0-60mph in about 6 seconds and its hugely spacious and weighs about 4,000 pounds.the only bad thing is the quality of the interior and the fuel economy isnt great

  • dont know wheater to get the V6 300 or the 300C the hemi version is it a roughter ride or smooth just like the v6?

  • Who will buy such a car without safety package ?

  • @TWPOwns12 The Maxima is a decidedly smaller car & is cramped for extended travel with 4 grown adults. The 300C is a 12 - 14 hr- day traveller with 4 big adults in perfect comfort. It is a LOT faster than the maxima, handles beautifully & runs very happily on reg gas. I have an 08 BMW 328i & an 05 300C that I bought used because the 328 is a useless vehicle for touring with adults, just like the Maxima. The 300C is a very solid car & has given me zero problems. I love it.

  • I got my '06 for 15grand. And I love my 300c.My buddy loved it so much He got an '07 srt.To me its a great,fun and comfy car

  • its like the mini version of Rolls Royce.

  • @jawadalishe dont even say that. they are nothing alike.

  • this car is a piece of crap, too many blind spots, and its ride is nothing compared to the likes of maybe something like a maxima which is in the same price range

  • @TDWPOwns12

    Not only does the 300c ride better than the Max, but it is also faster, nicer looking, RWD, V8...no comparison.

    If you want an overpriced FWD POS with a CVT (lol), go ahead and get the Max. I might have even forgiven the design of the new Maxima, but I saw one on the road the other day, and the rear 3/4 view makes the car look like complete shit.

  • @th3ha1og0d

    Obviously its faster, its a V8. I don't think its nicer then a 06,07 Maxima which has an elegance to it, the 300 just looks like a blob of steel on wheels, have you ever even ridden in a maxima?

  • @TDWPOwns12

    Elegance? 6th generation Maxima's look like COWS on wheels...

  • @th3ha1og0d the 300 looks like a cheap bentley. not original at all

  • @th3ha1og0d

    lol i don't get how your relating a cow to a car, it's really not that nice of a car IMO but you probably own one or something that's why your defending it like its your wife

  • @TDWPOwns12

    And you own a Maxima?

  • @th3ha1og0d

    lol so you do own one, no a G37, i just know a Maxima is a nicer and longer lasting car, American cars are way behind Japanese cars

  • @TDWPOwns12

    japanese cars are way behind american cars buddy put the crack pipe down

  • @th3ha1og0d

    lmfao okay man keep thinking that

  • @TDWPOwns12

    i do not understand what's funny.

  • @th3ha1og0d

    your comment

  • @TDWPOwns12

    even if you believe some of them are better which i can understand like the linc, buick and caddy, when it comes to cars not in the luxury class, american cars have not come very far espeically when it comes to mpg

  • They need to make a smaller RWD car with that engine. 3 Series size with a Hemi would be awesome.

  • Comment removed

  • @teddyizzle It's actually built on the 1996-2000 Mercedes E class chassis

  • @igotwhips only because mercedes bought chrysler thinking that they could turn chrysler around. finally mercedes doesnt own freaking chrysler anymore. my dad has a 2010 e-class and the 300 c doesnt compare.

  • @teddyizzle Who asked u fag? Go drive mommys corolla 

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx my mom has a lexus dumbass

  • @teddyizzle O dear, lets hope she doesnt get the toyota throttle issue and go full speed into a dump truck.

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx it's an rx 350, so it doesnt have any of the recall problems even though its a 2010.

  • @teddyizzle Still, Lets not forget Pearl Harbour...

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx

    Pearl Harbour is child's play considering what China will do to the US: 400 nukes over 2 weeks.

  • @JeremyFuhenstasser It would never happen bud.

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx

    Exactly. So what's your point about don't forget Pearl Harbor. Perhaps Asians shouldn't forget about how Europeans genocided their cousisn the Native Americans.

  • @JeremyFuhenstasser completely irrelevant but okay.

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx

    Whites are gonna get their karma for killing off millions of native Americans. You just wait and see!

  • @JeremyFuhenstasser Not gonna happen kid, take ur meds

  • @Chernobylxsurvivorx

    Try do that to East Asians and I swear to God you'll all die.

  • my favorite car

  • I bought this car yesterday,And So far it's amazing

  • well the new chrysler 300c scores 4 of 5 stars in side crash test!

  • hater

  • I don't think Chrystler is much better either. They have been using the same PowerTech engines since 2002 without making any major updates except the one where they uprated the 4.7 to 302hp

  • @vistauploader Probably because they have no money for new platforms. That is going to change in 2011.

  • Oh and when does this thing get to 60 because the Hyundai gets there 5.3 seconds and it was 4100 lbs.

  • @vistauploader

    C&D pegs the '05 300c @ 5.3 seconds 0-60

  • Oh and when does this thing get to 60 because the Hyundai gets there 5.3 seconds and it was 4100 lbs.

  • Oh and when does this thing get to 60 because the Hyundai gets there 5.3 seconds and it was 4100 lbs.

  • Oh and when does this thing get to 60 because the Hyundai gets there 5.3 seconds and it was 4100 lbs.

  • Funny. Your paying about 45K for this car and the engine is too large for that amount of HP. With the Hyundai Genesis fully loaded is just over 42,000 and has a V8 that makes more HP. 42000=375HP 4.6V8, 17 Speaker 600 Watt Audio which it is the only car that has that system and comes with lots for features. Then you this car for 45000 and 340HP 5.7V8 and not as many features. Not very good at all. At least you paid less for a car that competes with the MB E-Class and BMW 5-Series

  • @vistauploader Genesis lacks style and is a legacy Korean brand. They have to make their car cheap to attract the chumps who think they're getting a good car for the money.

    RIP Genesis

  • @vistauploader Or you could pay 30K for a G8 GT, that has a 6 Liter, 6 speed tranny that out performs the two cars you just mentioned for 15 thousand less.

  • @vistauploader Chrysler played around with the 5.7 V8 for the 2009 model year.... it now produces 376 horsepower....

  • if i was to get this.., with the navigation and everthing. would the factory head unit have a sub out? or would i have to put in an aftermarket head unit? cause i really like the look of the head unit and i wouldnt wanna replace it so early on.

  • i test drove a v8 yesterday...WOW made it from Walnut Creek Chrysler to OAK INTERNATIONL AND BACK IN UNDER 45MINUTES!!

  • im buying a 300 walter p for my first car...it has the head turning qualtiy

  • That´s exactly why american cars won´t sell in europe. We hate the interior quality..

    Soft feel, en luxurious looks are regarded more important than a nice looking exterior, who sees the exterior? Exactly, the one who is not driving it..

  • And everyone hates you.

    That's the exact reason I didn't buy a BMW. Spartan interior full of plastics.

  • Dude why get personal.. let´s stick to the car...

  • No, it's ok.

    The Europeans have always complained about American car interiors, well guess what, for $30k more yours aren't any better.

    Don't get angry because no European car offers the performance of this car at such a low price.

    GOOD DAY

  • you are mixing emotion with facts, never a good combo.

    accept the fact that there are different markets, Americans have different requirements than european buyes, that´s fine. but then both sides should accept that their cars will not sell as well on the other side.

    No worries there, performance is not the issue in europe, as most of us drive diesel on german highways, no petrol car would last for 200.000 miles on those speeds..

  • BTW, I love the 300C, and just bought one 2 months ago (Diesel version of the wagon)

    The thing is, more people in europe would buy it if the interior was a better quality it´s a missed chance by chrysler..

  • @th3ha1og0d The problem is that this car is too expensive in Europe. I paid over 60000 Euro's ($ 80000) for my 300C back in 2008. The base price for a 300C (V6) is 50000 Euro's in my country ($70000), that means it compeats with the 5-series/E-class and A6. For the same price they offer much better interiors, so you really have to like the 300C (like i do ;) to buy one in Europe. And it's the same story with Cadillac. American cars are just too expensive in Europe...that's why they don't sell.

  • @visuaguy so basically everyone

  • What are you talking about? This car is the most awarded car in history for its design.

  • i love this car!

  • Who cares if there is Cheap plastic. Plastic is Plastic to me. I like the car. I'd drive.

  • RYwiccan..

    I agree, who cares about cheap plastic. At the end of the day, cheap plastic looks the same as normal plastic, and unless I drive fondling the plastics or hitting or trying to pull it off, I'm not that bothered how it feels.

    If it means I can get a fast well equipped car like this for a good price just because the plastic is abit cheaper, then I'm happy.

  • Thank you! Finally someone else who agrees! Cheap plastic lasts longer, and is easier to take care of! Just like if you was to buy jeans at walmart, and then buy jean at hollister, the jeans from walmart would last longer! Cheap stuff is soo much better!

  • Theres alot of things in life where cheaper things do last longer. Look at some of houses here in the UK. Some were made out of wood, a few bricks, and mud, and wattle...all of which are were cheap hand made natural resouces.And 500 years later,they are are still standing.

    Yet we built tower blocks out of expensive man made material like steel etc, and they were ready to be pulled down after 30 years.

  • Great video. Every other video of this car is mad stupid on Youtube. This car's interior looks really tiny and doesn't seem worth anywhere near $45k.

  • fake metal is better then $2000 worth or metal just so kids can fuck it up dick

  • All new Chryslers are very nicely designed. them are very modern and good looking like Sebring and 300c, but the building quality and that plastic interior lames it little bit,but i don't actually care. modern design over a little quality problems for me. Well i'am got used to a German cars like mercedes and VW so my opinion that the interior feels cheap can come from there as well.

  • cheap interiors can be found on some VW's, but when has Mercedes or BMW ever put a plastic dash or fake aluminum paneling in their cars?

  • c300

  • I've driven a current generation c300 4-matic (an '08 model I believe) and the overall interior quality was superb. -It wasn't a very well-equipped model and as such there was a bit too much black vinyl, but at least it wasn't black plastic. I'd like to know just what you're referring to.

  • vinyl? the dash is COVERED in black plastic.

  • Yes, vinyl. I sat in it and drove it a number of times, it was on loan to my father just over a year ago. I had heard all the horror stories about Mercedes' build quality over the past few years, and when I got the opportunity to use it for a few days, I meticulously looked the interior over to see how much quality had actually returned. And buddy, that was Not a plastic dash. Prey-tell, where did you get the idea that it is? -Have you ever been inside one?

  • My grandma has this car. I like it because it's different from many of the other cars out there.

  • this is tank not car :))))

  • at the beginig, profile view, the car looks like All Terrain or heavy duty shit

  • good DESIGN but CHEAPLY built

  • That's the problem with American cars, too much ambition not enough effort.

  • ESTO ES UNA MIERDA,bmw audi y mercedes son los mejores coches

  • dude b4 said 300c competes with m3? wtf....lol...my stomach hurts from laughing..... i have a bmw and that is insulting

  • neat.

  • No you don't.

  • chrysler 300 srt8 will dust the m3 ! You are stuck on a name but like it or not srt8 has way more power !

  • that is such a typical american redneck answer...its hopeless

  • That is such a typical arrogant European answer.

  • Are you kidding?!?!? Have you seen the specs on the M3? Compact car with a 4.0L V8 w/ over 400HP and a redline of 8500 RPM's. The M3 also weighs about 500 lbs less. Not to mention it's built for performance.

    Why would you compare a Chrysler to a BMW? There's no comparison at all. Check the 0-60 times of each car. The M3 will DUST the 300C. Period. Raw horsepower does not mean a thing. An 80hp motorcycle will DUST nearly any car on the market.

  • 80 horses are you crazy... you kinda took it too far there

    but m3 does destroy it but 300cs dont cost shit

    and m3s cost so much

  • My GSX650f has about 80-85hp. That's not much for a motorcycle. A GSXR 600 has around 110hp, and a literbike has quite a bit more than that.

    My point to tierren was that horsepower doesn't mean a thing until you factor in the weight of the vehicle. Comparing a 300C to a motorcycle is definitely unfair... I know. I've raced several 300C's with 5.7/6.1L HEMI's, and ALL of them lost miserably. That's why comparing an M3 to a 300C is unfair.

  • LOL now thats funny

  • chrysler company is beautiful

  • If Chrysler did what cadillac did, they wouldn't be in much trouble now. The Chrysler 300 has the looks that would compete with it's german rivals but It doesn't have the quality and performance to kill them as how cadillac did with their cts.

    Chrysler! tune this thing in the nurburgring, improve the interior quality and ride comfort, make it lighter even. I see a bright future for chrysler with the 300c and I dont want this car to be put to waste. Forget that ugly PT cruiser aswell.

  • Or as Bam Margera says, PT Loser.

  • ha! i agree with you on the PT cruiser. that car doesnt deserve to be chrysler

  • The CTS is an interesting competitor. I don't think you could make the 300 into a Chrysler CTS. It's design is to 'American' for that. The CTS really is a car targeted at NA and Europe, whereas the 300 seem to be targeted at NA. Not bad in anyway but it's strengths are also a weakness in some ways. That said, the 300 seems to line up better with the BMW 5 series than CTS does. Chryser has thier work cut out for the 2010 300 GM did a good job with the CTS. Better dyamics, quality are needed

  • Not exactly Chrysler CTS but how Cadillac did the CTS. It's target is of course N/A but nowadays, even the locals would have something overseas so like Cadillac, Chrysler should give the 300 foreign quality but keep the "American" ness of the car. The looks for is the winning point of the car.

    thought it looks a bit german according to some motoring journalists.

  • I have an 05 300c, and my parents own an 05 CTS with 3.9L , six speed manual. My 300 is lowered 1", it kills the cts in everything. Off the line, top speed, handling you name it. M5 will clearly beat a 300c and SRT8. M3 against a stock 300c is a close race, but with a few modifications 300c will walk all over an M3. CTS-V and an M5 are a close, close race.

  • I have to say, I'm a Ford guy but I'm liking these Chrysler 300s.

  • These are being redesigned for the 2011 models.

    And Chrysler isn't bankrupt because of the Chrysler 300. It's bankrupt because of terrible cars such as the Sebring and PT Cruiser.

    They still make good vehicles such as the Ram, Caravan, and 300.

    Also, Chryslers vehicles are not known for reliability.

    Personally, I prefer the Town Car because it's body on frame and it doesn't fail you after 250,000 miles. We have 2 in limo service that have more than a million miles.

  • there is probably no way a car could have a million miles, combined yes but individually no. and Chrysler does make good cars, they were known for their Engines and Transmissions but Diamler screwed all that up with the 2.7 V6 and 4 speed automatic.

  • that engine and transmission existed regardless of any Daimler interference

  • Dude, $45 grand, 425hp, 420ft-lbs and you want what - a leather dash? Give me a break....Name me another sedan that boast these numbers and Brembo brakes. It competes with cars that are over $20K more (ie.. IS-F, M3 Sedan). I just don't understand where these test drivers/reviewers come from --Germany? Get real........

  • RIP BILLY MAYS

  • Am I mistaken, or does the 300C have the side airbag logo??

  • t will probably say on the steeing wheel air bag but there is no airbags in there u can get the to put some in there for a certain amount of money

  • Go to 2:47 and look next to his shoulder - I did a little snooping and found that this IS an airbag tag.

  • these cars are actually selling cheap. you can pick one up used fully loaded with the hemi in the low 20's with about 25 thousand miles on them or less. I'm not sure about the brand new ones

  • Such A Same that this amazing ---PURE AMERICAN--- Brand being bought by that stupid italian Fiat ..... fuck, where the world is coming to. :P

  • $45,000? im glad your dead chrystler.

  • Go die

  • learn how to spell nigger

    "chrystler"

    Idiot.

  • if i was a nigger do you really think i would be dissing chrisler? hehe im just fucking you man, dodge is badass.

  • shit i just misspelled chrysler again

  • you're stupid.

    I think that "badmudda" is a name which a black person would use on youtube.

    fail

  • oh...well then i suppose that excuses your racist comment dick.

  • can some one tell me why the interior for Chrysler are always cheap or look cheap

    why can't they get better materials like BMW or Mercedes???? WHY and this is asking before they got broke

  • For 2009, they added a LOT better materials to it. Just look on their website at pictures.

  • excuse me what are you talking about - Mercedes and BMW are not really all that well made. they have serious reliability issues as well - the stock BMW or Merc is pretty basic. To kit to a higher level costs $20k more. 20k more you could kit the 300c with gold plating throughout!

  • Also, on the older chrysler 300 models, mercedes thought chrysler shouldnt be that luxurious. And that mercedes should be the best luxury in the company. that is why their interiors WERE crap.

  • What?!? That doesn't even make sense. What in the world gave you the impression that a car company would just make an interior poor for the sake of making a poor interior, xxxMafia101??!!

  • Because Mercedes wanted Chrysler to compete with entry level luxury companies such as buick.

  • so why not upgrade the interior so that it beats the competition?

  • Chrysler had NO money while they were with mercedes. That is why when the u.s. went into the ression, chrysler had to declare chapter 11. So in other words, Mercedes drained chrysler and then dumped them.

  • chrysler declared chapter 11 cuz they made shitty cars that nobody was buying. thank god for the split. chevy camaro ss forever.

  • And how about GM there buddy? They are worse off than Chrysler.

  • still better than chrysler

  • And in what way? Chrysler is home free. GM is still getting money from the government.

  • The simple answer would be that it might have been too expensive. I've noticed that all car interiors have seriously improved after 2008. Especially the domestics. Not sure what changed. Interiors can't be cheap though.

  • FYI there is a reason the v6 Chrysler 300 isn't as fast as a g35/37 or BMW 335i...it's a larger, heaver FAMILY sedan mated to a 4 speed auto which is at a disadvantage in terms of # of cogs. It only makes sense that a smaller, lighter car with a higher output engine and more performance oriented transmission would be faster, you stupid cockroach.

    If you want FAST, try the SRT8 or even the 300c, which are by far more powerful and offer more value for your dollar.

    COCKROACH

  • you can see at 2:45 the car has side seat airbags. This guy says it doesn't.

  • Holy crap, how in the world did you notice that?!?!? This review guy is a tool anyway.

  • hey guys what in your opinion is better...the chrysler 300 or the doge charger

  • 300c and i can tell because i own the 300c and my brother used to own a charger. some think the charger is better for a young boy but i like the 300 and i am 20. anyways i got to tell you most girls don't see a difference between them lol.

  • NO thank,,,

    i dont like this car,,, -- NO 2 yellow ambers on rear taillights for turning sign,,, -- big body and small windows,,, -- what country make this car

  • Canada made the car. I just bought one.

  • LadiesMan769,

    Canada made the car. I just bought one.

    what is wrong with chrysler,,,

    how come america can not make it,,,

    why canada make it for

  • Canada make dis car. I canadda man. I bye this car.

  • Have you looked at how much stuff gets made in Canada? I think we are the US's biggest trading partner by a sizable margin. At least the US is for Canada.

    There a lot of US car company factories in Canada. To some extent we see this cars as our own. Might be strange to you, but if you say 'domestic car' in Canada it's the same list you would mention.

    The US out sources just as much, as any other country and Canada gets a lot of it. What's a revolution between family? :)

  • Square Head and Square American Car

  • A big Boat car....A Square Frame and Old Mecanics.... Try and Look Japonese Car Before Buying that... Honda Accord or Toyota Camry is a better Choice...

  • And also I don't have a minority opinion. The Chrysler 300/c/srt8 is a very popular car and I see A LOT more of them on the road than I do the new Maxima. So far I've seen TWO '09 Maximas on the road. I see more Chrysler 300's EACH DAY when I drive. So who has the minority opinion again? Let me know.

    I'm probably going to end up buying a Chrysler 300 very soon myself anyways and would not even consider the Nissan Maxima. For me the Chrysler 300 is EASILY the better car in either v6 or v8 form.

  • Buy the 300, I gurantee you'll love it!! Plus its fun when people stop u in parking lots, gas stations, or even when you're at a read light with the windows down to tell you they love your car. I mean Im sure that happens all the time with the Maxima too...lol :)

  • Good to see someone agrees with me...Whenever one of those passes by on the road they ALWAYS catch my eye.

    Beautiful car.

  • It actually took some time to grow on me, but now I love it. My dad bought one and its the Vanilla White color, and then he tinted the windows, so it looks amazing! I was personally hoping more for the CTS until I drove the 300C, there truely is no comparison. But I still am pretty fond of the CTS:)

  • That is a very nice color for the car. The HEMI is a gem of an engine too. These cars have such a commanding road presence, they're big and proud to be big. I very much like the 300c as you can probably tell.

  • Why is it that so many Posts on YouTube videos simply turn into Pissing Contests between people instead of making relevant commentary on the presented video?

    I own a 2005 300C non-SRT8. I like it. (Other people don't, obviously.) It drives nicely (it should; it's based off an older E-class Mercedes), has an impressive sound system, I like the way it looks and it cost me $17,000 when I bought it used a year ago. I paid cash. It has a K&N cold air intake and a fairly quiet ride at 75 mph.

  • The silver on the center consual is not fake. it is real alluminium.

  • no it isn't real aluminum you idiot. i have a 300C and the centre console is plastic

  • that really blows my mind they wouldn't put side curtain airbags or any torso airbags for the front passengers. if i spend over $40,000 on a car i expect a lot from it, one of them being my safety. that's crazy how little this car has.

  • What's the worry if you're a good driver? You won't get in any accidents and therefore won't require the airbags. Get with the program, Nancy.

  • Comment removed

  • Chrysler 300's are very nice cars. I'd consider myself very lucky and very proud to drive a fine American car. I don't know why the reviewer was complaining about the interior; I sat in a 2008 300 at the auto show and it had a very nice interior in terms of materials and fit and finish (they upgraded materials for 08 MY).

    This car is leaps ahead of the Toyota Avalon, Honda Accord, and Nissan Maxima.

    People who are smart will buy Chrysler vehicles right now and take advantage of the good deals