Glenn's intro is a little misleading: he is not, as he implies, playing music from the second scene between Elektra and Chrysothemis's (in which Elektra, as he says, tries to implicate her sister in the murder plot), but music from their FIRST scene together, specifically Chrysothemis's aria " Ich kann nicht sitzen und ins Dunkel starren", etc.
Now wait a second! I always thought Glenn Gould was strange but brilliant. And I own his essays and have read them and agree with his opinions on Mozart. But how brilliant is he if he is commenting on Strauss's Electra and does not know Sophocles in and out - - his comments about chrysothemis' role just seem stupid.
I'm sorry, I'm embarrassed. But Strauss / Hoffmansthal have really worked with Sophocles as a point of departure.
@VivaRenata I don't get what you mean. He doesn't know the plot of Elektra very well? That's hardly of great importance. He's a musician, not a Strauss scholar, or a Sophocles scholar for that matter.
The man was a genius.... nothing elitist about that! Nowadays one is sued to seeing Bocelli or Fleming spoonfeeding the idiot public with stupid remarks about nothing. Gould ANYDAY!!!!
In watching the Gould portion of the Art of Piano film he mentioned, I believe in the same program from this excerpt is taken, that if we can't get back to when performers had a composer's insight into music...and an audience consisting of composers or people that composed for themselves..that music is dead. Doesn't this go against his whole idea of democratization of music through recordings? Am I misunderstanding him? Was that statement taken out of next?
Hmm...I think Gould hoped that the democratization of music and the universal (or near-universal) public access to recordings would also bring about an increase in the wider public's musical understanding, thus decreasing/eliminating these hierarchical divisions (performer/composer/audience).
The analogy to 18th century is interesting, because then, it was really the stratification of society (between the educated upper class who took music lessons, heard concerts, etc; and the rest of society, who had access neither to formal musical education nor "art music" concerts) that allowed for an audience of composers. Then the industrial revolution came along and changed all of this, bringing concerts to a mass audiences and, some argue, causing the birth of the cult of virtuosity.
I think it was this phase of the development of music in society that Gould most argued against -- concerts where the virtuoso performed on the stage before huge audiences, in a certain sense lording his higher position over them. (Contrast to the smaller concerts of the pre-industrial revolution era.) I suppose Gould hoped that recording could undo this, both because of its greater public accessibility & because it encouraged the listener to more deeply understand & be involved in the music.
bla bla bla
RAREpicture 6 months ago
Does anybody know what composer (sounded like Vriehen to me) he mentioned and plays brief piece at 2.04 ?
schizoid911 7 months ago
Glenn's intro is a little misleading: he is not, as he implies, playing music from the second scene between Elektra and Chrysothemis's (in which Elektra, as he says, tries to implicate her sister in the murder plot), but music from their FIRST scene together, specifically Chrysothemis's aria " Ich kann nicht sitzen und ins Dunkel starren", etc.
JeeRant 1 year ago
Now wait a second! I always thought Glenn Gould was strange but brilliant. And I own his essays and have read them and agree with his opinions on Mozart. But how brilliant is he if he is commenting on Strauss's Electra and does not know Sophocles in and out - - his comments about chrysothemis' role just seem stupid.
I'm sorry, I'm embarrassed. But Strauss / Hoffmansthal have really worked with Sophocles as a point of departure.
VivaRenata 1 year ago
@VivaRenata I don't get what you mean. He doesn't know the plot of Elektra very well? That's hardly of great importance. He's a musician, not a Strauss scholar, or a Sophocles scholar for that matter.
alienalienss 1 year ago
The interviewer looks like Dr. Strangelove!
wogandmush 2 years ago 3
that Strangelovian interviewer is the then ubiquitous and facetious Humphrey Burton, a brit. Keep awake, indeed!
jeepgerhard212 2 years ago
question: where can I find a recording of any interpretation of elektra on the piano on CD?? any experts here who can help me??
riopiedra74 2 years ago
The man was a genius.... nothing elitist about that! Nowadays one is sued to seeing Bocelli or Fleming spoonfeeding the idiot public with stupid remarks about nothing. Gould ANYDAY!!!!
mrantiquedealer 2 years ago 2
Elektra-fying indeed!
kaypapademas 2 years ago
Parts of this interview can be found all over YouTube (with Glenn discussing Mozart, more Strauss, etc.).
I've noticed the interviewer is a bit of ass ("Why don't you try to keep us awake.."), and, perhaps as a result, Gould seems a little nervous.
Viviseckshunist 2 years ago
What a musician. And what a character! Do such people live today in our bubble world of instant everything?
wehaveasituation 2 years ago 2
what part of the opera is this excerpt from?
thewayup 2 years ago
Many thanks for posting this!
dpr980 2 years ago
In spite of the poor quality, thanks for posting this!
weikko79 3 years ago
Genius.
ssballs 3 years ago
Pardon me, I meant to say "..out of context."
Pogouldiwitz 3 years ago
Pardon me, I meant to say "...out of context."
Pogouldiwitz 3 years ago
In watching the Gould portion of the Art of Piano film he mentioned, I believe in the same program from this excerpt is taken, that if we can't get back to when performers had a composer's insight into music...and an audience consisting of composers or people that composed for themselves..that music is dead. Doesn't this go against his whole idea of democratization of music through recordings? Am I misunderstanding him? Was that statement taken out of next?
Pogouldiwitz 3 years ago
Hmm...I think Gould hoped that the democratization of music and the universal (or near-universal) public access to recordings would also bring about an increase in the wider public's musical understanding, thus decreasing/eliminating these hierarchical divisions (performer/composer/audience).
-to be continued
p0lyph0ny 3 years ago
The analogy to 18th century is interesting, because then, it was really the stratification of society (between the educated upper class who took music lessons, heard concerts, etc; and the rest of society, who had access neither to formal musical education nor "art music" concerts) that allowed for an audience of composers. Then the industrial revolution came along and changed all of this, bringing concerts to a mass audiences and, some argue, causing the birth of the cult of virtuosity.
-t b c
p0lyph0ny 3 years ago
I think it was this phase of the development of music in society that Gould most argued against -- concerts where the virtuoso performed on the stage before huge audiences, in a certain sense lording his higher position over them. (Contrast to the smaller concerts of the pre-industrial revolution era.) I suppose Gould hoped that recording could undo this, both because of its greater public accessibility & because it encouraged the listener to more deeply understand & be involved in the music.
p0lyph0ny 3 years ago
But his statement in that program still smacks of elitism, to me. Not everyone has the time to study theory, etc.
It's the only instance when I was slightly disappointed in Glenn.
Pogouldiwitz 3 years ago
One of the first truly intelligent answers I've seen around here.
lilcomposer 2 years ago
Gould had read Benjamin? i never knew!
monkeynailz 1 year ago
Thanks for posting!
Norbeone 3 years ago