The Blazers should've won the NBA title the year before if they hadn't given Game 7 away to those damn Lakers. They would've had no problem taking care of the Pacers.
@rspivey6 I don't think Lakers had any trouble taking care of the Pacers either. Now you Blazers got nothing to build on and absolutely no chance at winning a title, am I wrong?
they seriously had an all star squad around those years... wallace, stoudamire, smith, pippen, sabonis, wells was decent, and jermaine o neal on the bench lol even tho he didnt blow up yet
Well yeah..when it comes down to it, Shaq is the ultimate factor. The Blazers, Kings, Spurs, no team could stop him. At this time he was an all-world center.
You had awesome talent, but it never meshed together and when u guys played us u were always on edge..Sheed, throwing the towel in Sabonis face, Pippen throwing towels in the hall, countless other outburts lol. Blazers were no match for the Lakers once it came to winning time..
They meshed together fine. You're forgetting the fact that NOBODY could compete with the Lakers after that first championship. We took them to 7 in 2000, and the Lakers lost I think only 1 playoff game over the next two seasons. They swept everyone. It's not like the Blazers just pulled some major choke against those Lakers, everyone got smoked by them.
Sorry, I accidentilly deleted your response to my response. Anyway you said the Blazers lacked maturity to win a world title.. I doubt that was it, sure Rasheed was and still is a hothead, but you can't say Kobe and Shaq had the maturity it takes to win a title either. I don't think maturity has anything to do with the Lakers being dominant. It was because you had Shaq. Giant, dominant centers win titles. Bring on Oden:)
"Pippen throwing towels in the hall.." WTF? he was frustrated that they gave the game away to the Lakers. There wasnt anything wrong with that. Rasheed was unstable, granted, but even given that, the Blazers remember came back from being down 3-1, to being up 15 points in the 4th quarter of Game 7. No, we didn't win. Yes, the Lakers were the better team. But the Blazers, "no match" for the Lakers? hardly. yall were minutes away from blowing a 3-1 lead, a gigantic playoff choke.
its ok, the lakers choked away in the finals last year. i guess talking about something that happened 9 or so years ago makes them feel better. its contradicting. these laker fans are the same ones who talk SHT about shaq now. Laker fans seem to have some really strange way of arguing. nothing is logical from what ive seen. portland will be better than the lakers in a couple years and i really cant wait.
Lakers own the Blazers. Portland would always talk smack and never back it up when they played L.A.I was always happy when we beat them. Wish that rivalry was like it used to be..
yup. i watched all their games. they were like the sacramento kings. really really good but unfortunately...there was 1 team who was slightly better during their window of opportunity.
ah yes. my first blazer game, good times good times
jordythegiant10 3 years ago
The Blazers should've won the NBA title the year before if they hadn't given Game 7 away to those damn Lakers. They would've had no problem taking care of the Pacers.
rspivey6 4 years ago 2
If Sabonis was in his prime they would have won.
Blackwwoolff 3 years ago
if kobe had not diarroehaed all over
pimpsoldier0 2 years ago
@rspivey6 I don't think Lakers had any trouble taking care of the Pacers either. Now you Blazers got nothing to build on and absolutely no chance at winning a title, am I wrong?
Knightmare2k6 1 year ago
they seriously had an all star squad around those years... wallace, stoudamire, smith, pippen, sabonis, wells was decent, and jermaine o neal on the bench lol even tho he didnt blow up yet
youtoobfan15 4 years ago
Jermaine didn't blow up until a certain game against the Pistons when he blind side sucker punched an innocent fan.
pearlmax 4 years ago
Innocent fan? Whatever.
lakers1436 4 years ago
If you remember, the fan he hit hadn't done anything, his friend is the one who got into it with Artest.
pearlmax 4 years ago
those were the good old days when I was proud of the blazers
HoraceHaymen21 4 years ago
you should be proud of the blazers today...they exceeded expectations and they are a group of guys all blazer fans should be proud of
krnboyee 2 years ago
Well yeah..when it comes down to it, Shaq is the ultimate factor. The Blazers, Kings, Spurs, no team could stop him. At this time he was an all-world center.
MarioLaker 4 years ago
You had awesome talent, but it never meshed together and when u guys played us u were always on edge..Sheed, throwing the towel in Sabonis face, Pippen throwing towels in the hall, countless other outburts lol. Blazers were no match for the Lakers once it came to winning time..
MarioLaker 4 years ago
They meshed together fine. You're forgetting the fact that NOBODY could compete with the Lakers after that first championship. We took them to 7 in 2000, and the Lakers lost I think only 1 playoff game over the next two seasons. They swept everyone. It's not like the Blazers just pulled some major choke against those Lakers, everyone got smoked by them.
pearlmax 4 years ago
Sorry, I accidentilly deleted your response to my response. Anyway you said the Blazers lacked maturity to win a world title.. I doubt that was it, sure Rasheed was and still is a hothead, but you can't say Kobe and Shaq had the maturity it takes to win a title either. I don't think maturity has anything to do with the Lakers being dominant. It was because you had Shaq. Giant, dominant centers win titles. Bring on Oden:)
pearlmax 4 years ago
"Pippen throwing towels in the hall.." WTF? he was frustrated that they gave the game away to the Lakers. There wasnt anything wrong with that. Rasheed was unstable, granted, but even given that, the Blazers remember came back from being down 3-1, to being up 15 points in the 4th quarter of Game 7. No, we didn't win. Yes, the Lakers were the better team. But the Blazers, "no match" for the Lakers? hardly. yall were minutes away from blowing a 3-1 lead, a gigantic playoff choke.
kellyaucoin 4 years ago
its ok, the lakers choked away in the finals last year. i guess talking about something that happened 9 or so years ago makes them feel better. its contradicting. these laker fans are the same ones who talk SHT about shaq now. Laker fans seem to have some really strange way of arguing. nothing is logical from what ive seen. portland will be better than the lakers in a couple years and i really cant wait.
krnboyee 2 years ago
blazers should of won a ring if it werent for horry's lucky 3's... but yeah we had an awsome team those years.. (00-03)...
greekmonstervt91 4 years ago
Lakers own the Blazers. Portland would always talk smack and never back it up when they played L.A.I was always happy when we beat them. Wish that rivalry was like it used to be..
MarioLaker 4 years ago
we'll see who owns who in a few years with the best young talent we have now? good luck
goblazers503 4 years ago
Man, that was when Portland was good. They should have won the NBA finals one of those years.
johnrehman 4 years ago
yup. i watched all their games. they were like the sacramento kings. really really good but unfortunately...there was 1 team who was slightly better during their window of opportunity.
MaxaMillion711 4 years ago