I haven't heard from the San Fransicko crowd.....I suppose this is a free cheap thrill. Well, maybe the left coast politicos like Nasty Pillhozie and Barbara Schmoxer will weigh in .....then we can go to the 9th Circus court and ALL be entertained!
@ladylordess Its the global elite that are destroying America and the rest of the world. They want everyone to live under their tyranny and oppression. The DHS and TSA is just another one of their sick tools to domesticate people.
@ceoaalp Unions and the government are enslaving people while pretending to be FOR their rights. All they care about is political power and membership dues. They create nothing, therefore are nothing. Victim/Oppressor only occurs if the victim allows it to. Create something.
@ladylordess They most certainly do not have a union, YET!!! Guess who is sniffing around them?? They are ripe for a greedy union who are in desperate need of new membership dues.
I'd like to see all the TSA employees who disagree with this policy of forced sexual assault opt out themselves - stay home sick on Wed. so you're not at work groping innocent citizens.
best to live in australia. airport here are still using dogs, metal detectors and of course best ever defense to catch criminals with hidden drugs, terrorist intents etc by ---- PROFILING!
A note on the milk debate, from one who was instrumental in opening up the area's first Co-op.....
CHOICE.
If you want the raw milk, with all its advantages and dis-advantages, you should be allowed to. As long as you're fully informed, the onus is on you.
We get our raw goat milk from the goat lady and its wonderful stuff....but we use it quick and don't let it set out at all. The State would have me (and her) arrested for this.
So yeah, after seeing a video of some perverted fucktard twisting a woman's nipples I decided I'd never fly. I never have, I wanted to try it some day. Now the only way I will do it is on a private aircraft. Is it sad I have to differentiate between private and commercial aircraft now?
Let's face it, the US has gone crazy. It's about time some libertarians bombes a movie theater, a concert, a school, a marketplace, a shopping mall, an office building, a zoo, a restaurant, a pub, a cramped pedestrian crossing, a bus, a metro, a train, a town meeting, a stadium, tv audience, a club, a coffee shop or any bloody place you can get a decent amount of casualties. Let’s see if people want a pat down to watch a movie.
Isn't America great? We just had a terrorist get off on over 280 charges and was only charged with one count of conspiracy...... while law-abiding citizens will be scanned,wanded and physically groped because they want to go on Thanksgiving vacation.
Let's reassert the 4th amendment to airport screening. Ya gotta have a warrant based on probable cause. Just buying an airline ticket does not constitute probable cause. The warrants must issue with an oath or affirmation, and have to specify the place and person to be searched.
The airlines are trying to get the taxpayer to subsidize their security responsibility. If security were privatized, they could require any search they wanted.
Leave airlines liable for damage their planes cause.
I don't think you should give TSA "inspectors" a warning. They touch you inappropriately, you punch them in the face and call them a faggot. You'll probably get arrested, but charges can't be too serious for a gut reaction to a guy feeling you up.
If enough TSA agents get punched, they'll be at least a little less inappropriate, right? Even if this fails, it would be fun.
TSA agents work for the federal government. Federal government employees are exempt from a lot of laws and regulations that apply to the rest of us cattle.
Ron Paul has just introduced a simple one paragraph bill ("HR 6416, the American Traveler Dignity Act") repealing this exemption.
See, THIS video is an example of why Reason rocks. Making sexual molestation as a prerequisite to boarding a flight is ridiculous and must be stopped. These other videos suggesting that we should all smoke weed or should be allowed to sell bacteria laden milk muddy the Reason brand.
There are much bigger fish to fry, and the TSA is one of them.
@blogegog Wait, so it's okay for the gov't to force you to be pat down? But it isn't okay for the gov't to raid raw food places and tell them they can't sell what they want? I mean, it's not like they're misrepresenting what they sell... :/
@HiwaKaoru The other way around, Hiwa. It's not ok for the government to squeeze your testicles without due cause, but it is ok for the government to force you to kill bacteria in food you want to sell to the public. You can still drink the diseased milk yourself though, if that's what you're into. You just have to do your own harvesting.
No one has suggested we should all smoke weed. Reason is about freedom, regardless of your personal opinion. YOU may not want to smoke weed or drink raw milk, but Reason, I, and many other libertarians support people having a right to consume whatever they want. These issues and the TSA issue are all under the same umbrella, where government is overstepping it's constitutional bounds. If you're going to support the idea of freedom, you have to support it in all forms.
@myhipsi Regarding your last sentence, I disagree with you. To take an extreme example, I do not support the freedom to sell photos of naked 5 year olds performing sexual acts. No doubt you do not either. Likewise, but to a much lesser extent, I do not support anyone's right to sell bacteria-laden milk to the masses, many of whom don't even know what bacteria is.
And while I agree that everyone should be allowed to smoke weed, it must be tempered with the right to fire potheads.
Rephrase - You must support freedom (when there is no victim) in all forms.
Selling child porn is not victimless, it's a violation of the rights of another person. This is not the definition of freedom. Freedom can only exist if the rights of the citizen are protected.
The raw milk story was about a private club, not public. If you want to privately buy raw milk from a farmer, that should be your prerogative.
No, there is a 3rd party affected. The child doesn't have the capacity to consent to such an act, especially for the purposes of profit. So yes, there is indeed a victim.
Besides, your missing the point. The point was that freedom can only exist where the rights of the individual are protected.
@myhipsi This assumes that the child was somehow involved in the transaction between the seller and buyer. They were not. They were involved in the _production_ of the pornography, so a case can be made against the production. However the action of purchasing and selling is removed from the act of producing.
@myhipsi Then the answer is to create a situation where consent can occur.
Why are cartoons of "child porn" illegal? Did the ink not consent?
Why is it ok for 23 year old actors to portray teenagers, but its suddenly illegal if those fake teen characters interact sexually?
While child-porn laws are rationalized on "cannot consent", the fact is that they are based on arbitrary moral judgments by busybodies who want to force their views on everyone else at taxpayer expense.
I agree with you in the context of what you presented. I don't think it's even practical in this day and age, to have child-porn illegal per se. Since cell phone camera's (sexting, etc.) are so prevelant amongst younger teens and preteens. Eventually, it'll just be unenforcable, due to the shear amount of proliferation. However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal, and that's what I was originally refering to.
@myhipsi "I agree with you in the context of what you presented."
No, you don't.
"However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal"
Why? Why can't the actors sell their time? The producers sell their product? Why must you make any distinction what so ever between "civil" and "commercial"?
Either someone is harmed, or they're not. A murderer is no less a murderer because they didn't do it for money.
@blogegog, raw milk (milk as it is found in nature and as it has been consumed for thousands of years worldwide) is MUCH better for you than pasteurized milk when it is handled correctly. Small farms can do this. Big agriculture can't.
It is big agriculture that demonizes raw milk because small farmers are their competitors. Big agriculture also lobbies politicians to pass laws outlawing raw milk for the "safety" of the public when they are just protecting their interests, not ours.
@caraclaudel I don't agree with you, though you might be right. If you've ever milked a cow by hand, you know that there is a VERY good chance you're going to get a bit of cow poop in the bucket from their nasty tail flopping around, even if you have it pinned down with your body.
It's probably possible to avoid this 100% of the time, but how do you know the supplier DID avoid it? And raw milk can be pasteurized quite cheaply. Pennies per gallon. It doesn't lock ppl out of the market.
Raw milk producers run their dairies the same way everyone else does, just with one less procedural step. Portraying them as yokels hand-milking cows is extremely disingenuous and shows that you aren't capable of properly debating this subject.
@17Spartacus76 Really? It seemed like we were having a friendly and spirited debate before you showed up spart. Why so angry?
But if you believe that the only difference is the one procedural step, then you disprove the notion that small farms can't afford to do it. I see tremendous harm in allowing raw milk onto the market (the largest being listeria outbreaks). Where are the benefits?
Small farms can't afford to do what? Pasteurize? Where, pray tell, did I ever suggest such a stupid idea? You really need to work on your debating skills.
Pasteurization is known to destroy dozens of compounds in milk that not only kill pathogens, but make it even more nutritious. You're clearly arguing from a state of ignorance. There is no evidence, anywhere, that raw milk is any more dangerous than any other food.
@blogegog Or sometimes, the cow just steps in the bucket. It's pretty disgusting. It's possible, again, that the farmer would simply throw away that milk, but it's not likely. No one likes to throw away money.
I'm not trying to down dairy farmers. I'm just saying there are some good bacteriological reasons to pasteurize. Though I guess that if the people are FULLY informed of the risks, I would side with you guys. I'd like to read the waiver first though.
@blogegog Yeah, small farms do not hand milk, they milk using a machine and a sterile container. Second off, the active enzymes in milk are denatured during pasteurization. This destroys a lot of the health associated with milk. Bacteria is a risk, but that is a risk the consumer must have the choice of making. Whether or not they are fully informed by your standards is irrelevant as markets can only function where individuals are allowed to act on their preferences.
@blogegog, raw milk can be pasteurized cheaply, but the point of raw milk is that is hasn't been pasteurized. It contains the enzymes and healthy bacteria we thrive on.
There's a raw milk movement in the country as many want to return to less processed foods. For those who are interested, look up Sally Fallon and RealMilk.
The main point, though, is that we need LIBERTY so we can each live as we see fit. You want pasteurized and I want raw milk? In a free country, that should be fine.
@caraclaudel I'm pro-liberty & want to be on your side. But at the same time, I'm pro-safety. Not nanny state level safety. Just common sense safety. I would posit that you and I both know enough about raw milk to make an informed decision. But I would also say that most of the people who signed those waivers don't. They hear 'natural' or 'organic' and just assume it means 'good'. In this case, it certainly does NOT.
How do you propose to protect those not in the know? Or do you at all?
@blogegog, I believe pasteurized milk is the more dangerous of the two, as the things that make milk good for us have been killed by the pasteurization process.
Humans have been drinking raw milk for thousands of years. It's not a dangerous substance, though we've been taught for years that it is.
The government often grabs our freedoms in the name of protecting us, when they're actually harming us. Even when they have good intentions, they're often wrong. That's why freedom is so important.
@caraclaudel All you need to do is boil the milk and take/save the cream it goes to the top. If taste is to strong for you, you can mix it with water. Is healthier than what you get in the supermarket. Raw Milk is real milk, I don’t get WTF are this people supporting, they probably have not seen a cow in their live.... McDonalds fans ;-D
ReasonTV has *never* advocated the ingestion of marjuana (weed). They rightfully promote the idea of self-responsible action that includes the *decision* to smoke or otherwise use hemp based products. You don't seem to know much about mass produced milk either. It's the factory version of commercial milk, the stuff you find on retail chain grocers shelves, that is overly laden with harmful bacteria having removed the natural disinfectants.
You should open up the book _1984_ by George Orwell.
Like the "screens" that inundate the public squares in that book, you loudly make claims but never present supporting evidence. Is it because you can't find the evidence or the more likely case that you know what you claim is false but you believe you stand to benefit from others relying on and giving vocal support also to your false claims.
@maskedphrogg I can't present evidence in the youtube comment section, so just like yourself, I haven't presented evidence. I can only hope to convince you to do some research. You know, read about milk-borne diseases. You seem unwilling to do that though. So be it.
For the record, your decision to drink milk in any form will have no effect upon my life, beneficial or detrimental.
You made an outright claim that ReasonTV promotes the *use* of marijuana. Couch it in whatever terms you want now, but that claim in and of itself brands you a liar. You seem to ignore the fact that their videos are here and available publicly. That you would so blatantly lie about that subject, ReasonTV promotes smoking weed, leads reasonable people to be suspicious of any other claims you make. Shill for outlawing healthy food all you want, not all will fall for your sham.
In retrospect you are unwilling to debate the topic with supporting evidence. In case you hadn't noticed, there is a substantial volume of discussion here in YouTube and millions of posts that present evidence and debate the merits of arguments. I suggest you start being honest with yourself so you can then be honest in the arguments you make to others. You have made claims and now seem to think you can deny that discussion is even possible, we are to just accept your conclusions w/o debate.
@maskedphrogg Thank you for putting words into my mouth and then complaining that those words were lies. you would make a great politician. For the DNC at least.
Here's a clue, put some words in your own mouth. You continue to refuse to support your claim that ReasonTV promotes the "smoking of weed" and you also refuse to refute the claim that raw milk is healthy.
All I and a few others have done is identify you as a shill for outlawing healthy food and I have additionally accused you of knowingly lying about the motives and actions of ReasonTV. We name specific statements you made and point to their invalidity. All you do is bleat adhominem.
I think this video reaffirms my love for Reason: my friends and I frequently mocked Nicholas Cage movies, especially Con Air. Why couldn't you just put the bunny back in the box...?
I'm not looking forward to the next time I have to fly. I'm going to demand a pat down, but only if the person who does it is female and straight.
I mean, I'm a 5'3 Western GIRL. I might be brownish/beigish, but seriously.
I just feel sorry for my dear brother. He looks like such a terrorist... He already gets stopped in every single airport. Now I guess he's going to get a gloved hand up his rear at every stop. WE'RE NOT EVEN THE RIGHT KIND OF BROWN PEOPLE!
Wish Reason had the money to purchase a 30 second spot on national television. Don't know if using clips from a movie would fly on an ad though. Might want to remind air ports they can legally kick TSA out if they want.
This has been flagged as spam show
I love this film
felpaluche 2 months ago
This video idea is fuckin incredible GAH-DAM !! Kudos, ReasonTV !!
"If you touch my junk i'm gonna have you arrested" That made me queef
For men, one fingah
For weemen, TWO fingah...
For GrassHoppah... hang by dick naked in hotel closet
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
I haven't heard from the San Fransicko crowd.....I suppose this is a free cheap thrill. Well, maybe the left coast politicos like Nasty Pillhozie and Barbara Schmoxer will weigh in .....then we can go to the 9th Circus court and ALL be entertained!
MrHansAryan 1 year ago
Very true. Sad but true.
ceoaalp 1 year ago
Abolish the TSA. It is all about Unions!!! Unions are the destruction of America.
ladylordess 1 year ago 4
@ladylordess Its the global elite that are destroying America and the rest of the world. They want everyone to live under their tyranny and oppression. The DHS and TSA is just another one of their sick tools to domesticate people.
ceoaalp 1 year ago
@ceoaalp Unions and the government are enslaving people while pretending to be FOR their rights. All they care about is political power and membership dues. They create nothing, therefore are nothing. Victim/Oppressor only occurs if the victim allows it to. Create something.
ladylordess 1 year ago
@ladylordess They don't have a union
onlyblackstranger215 1 year ago
@ladylordess They most certainly do not have a union, YET!!! Guess who is sniffing around them?? They are ripe for a greedy union who are in desperate need of new membership dues.
ladylordess 1 year ago
"if you touch my junk I am going to have you arrested"
The newest of Great battle cries in american history...
tedm82 1 year ago
@tedm82 it's on par with "Don't taze me, bro"
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
I'd like to see all the TSA employees who disagree with this policy of forced sexual assault opt out themselves - stay home sick on Wed. so you're not at work groping innocent citizens.
truthnproof 1 year ago
Constitution = Reasonable search and seizures (We’re innocent until proven guilty!)
TSA = Unreasonable search and seizures (We’re guilty until proven innocent!)
BlameTheFirst 1 year ago 2
The French would never put up with what the Americans take from the TSA.
jasonlajoie 1 year ago
"Jewels" or "stuff" or "thing" or some such. NOT "junk." This is the vulgarization of America. :-(
PureLiberalFire 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
best to live in australia. airport here are still using dogs, metal detectors and of course best ever defense to catch criminals with hidden drugs, terrorist intents etc by ---- PROFILING!
freedomshoxwave 1 year ago
A note on the milk debate, from one who was instrumental in opening up the area's first Co-op.....
CHOICE.
If you want the raw milk, with all its advantages and dis-advantages, you should be allowed to. As long as you're fully informed, the onus is on you.
We get our raw goat milk from the goat lady and its wonderful stuff....but we use it quick and don't let it set out at all. The State would have me (and her) arrested for this.
Is that bullshit or what??
DragonDoctor69 1 year ago
@DragonDoctor69 it's bullchit. The government thinks we're too stupid to be responsible for our OWN choices.
theonlywesttexasmare 1 year ago
I really wish Carlin was alive if only to hear his comments on this.
I'd imagine he'd compare it to getting a giant security dick up our ass which seems accurate.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
So yeah, after seeing a video of some perverted fucktard twisting a woman's nipples I decided I'd never fly. I never have, I wanted to try it some day. Now the only way I will do it is on a private aircraft. Is it sad I have to differentiate between private and commercial aircraft now?
Silvsilvchan 1 year ago
Let's face it, the US has gone crazy. It's about time some libertarians bombes a movie theater, a concert, a school, a marketplace, a shopping mall, an office building, a zoo, a restaurant, a pub, a cramped pedestrian crossing, a bus, a metro, a train, a town meeting, a stadium, tv audience, a club, a coffee shop or any bloody place you can get a decent amount of casualties. Let’s see if people want a pat down to watch a movie.
wimscheers 1 year ago
Isn't America great? We just had a terrorist get off on over 280 charges and was only charged with one count of conspiracy...... while law-abiding citizens will be scanned,wanded and physically groped because they want to go on Thanksgiving vacation.
ONLY IN AMERICA
mcap52 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
"if you touch my junk I am going to have you arrested"
I can see that line said by Nick Cage.
bsabruzzo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In order to fight the people that hate us for our freedom, we're gonna have to take your freedom.
George Orwell would be proud.
MikeHansonArchives 1 year ago
Comment removed
MikeHansonArchives 1 year ago
Love it.
saper321 1 year ago
LOL! This is hilarious!
FreedomProjectDotCom 1 year ago
"if you touch my junk I am going to have you arrested"
I wan't that as my ring tone.
evilsceptic 1 year ago 35
Let's reassert the 4th amendment to airport screening. Ya gotta have a warrant based on probable cause. Just buying an airline ticket does not constitute probable cause. The warrants must issue with an oath or affirmation, and have to specify the place and person to be searched.
The airlines are trying to get the taxpayer to subsidize their security responsibility. If security were privatized, they could require any search they wanted.
Leave airlines liable for damage their planes cause.
freesk8 1 year ago 5
@freesk8 What the fuck are you blathering about?
That would actually make sense. You know we can't do that.
Silvsilvchan 1 year ago
lol
anarchylogic 1 year ago
I'm Janet Napolitano, and I approve this message.
julianhpike 1 year ago 2
I don't think you should give TSA "inspectors" a warning. They touch you inappropriately, you punch them in the face and call them a faggot. You'll probably get arrested, but charges can't be too serious for a gut reaction to a guy feeling you up.
If enough TSA agents get punched, they'll be at least a little less inappropriate, right? Even if this fails, it would be fun.
ghuegel 1 year ago 2
@ghuegel
TSA agents work for the federal government. Federal government employees are exempt from a lot of laws and regulations that apply to the rest of us cattle.
Ron Paul has just introduced a simple one paragraph bill ("HR 6416, the American Traveler Dignity Act") repealing this exemption.
watch?v=d-N5adYM7Kw
MengersDisciple 1 year ago 3
@MengersDisciple How do these exemptions prevent a person from punching them in the face?
ghuegel 1 year ago
TSA...FU.
truthsabre7 1 year ago
YAF finds this hilarious yaf.com
YAFHARDCORE 1 year ago
Alas, some welcomed humor in this abyss of BS. Thanks
Lexi8888 1 year ago
See, THIS video is an example of why Reason rocks. Making sexual molestation as a prerequisite to boarding a flight is ridiculous and must be stopped. These other videos suggesting that we should all smoke weed or should be allowed to sell bacteria laden milk muddy the Reason brand.
There are much bigger fish to fry, and the TSA is one of them.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog Wait, so it's okay for the gov't to force you to be pat down? But it isn't okay for the gov't to raid raw food places and tell them they can't sell what they want? I mean, it's not like they're misrepresenting what they sell... :/
HiwaKaoru 1 year ago
@HiwaKaoru The other way around, Hiwa. It's not ok for the government to squeeze your testicles without due cause, but it is ok for the government to force you to kill bacteria in food you want to sell to the public. You can still drink the diseased milk yourself though, if that's what you're into. You just have to do your own harvesting.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
No one has suggested we should all smoke weed. Reason is about freedom, regardless of your personal opinion. YOU may not want to smoke weed or drink raw milk, but Reason, I, and many other libertarians support people having a right to consume whatever they want. These issues and the TSA issue are all under the same umbrella, where government is overstepping it's constitutional bounds. If you're going to support the idea of freedom, you have to support it in all forms.
myhipsi 1 year ago 2
@myhipsi Regarding your last sentence, I disagree with you. To take an extreme example, I do not support the freedom to sell photos of naked 5 year olds performing sexual acts. No doubt you do not either. Likewise, but to a much lesser extent, I do not support anyone's right to sell bacteria-laden milk to the masses, many of whom don't even know what bacteria is.
And while I agree that everyone should be allowed to smoke weed, it must be tempered with the right to fire potheads.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
Rephrase - You must support freedom (when there is no victim) in all forms.
Selling child porn is not victimless, it's a violation of the rights of another person. This is not the definition of freedom. Freedom can only exist if the rights of the citizen are protected.
The raw milk story was about a private club, not public. If you want to privately buy raw milk from a farmer, that should be your prerogative.
myhipsi 1 year ago 3
@myhipsi Who is the victim of selling child porn? The only parties involved in the transaction are the buyer and seller.
TehBANN3D 1 year ago
@TehBANN3D
No, there is a 3rd party affected. The child doesn't have the capacity to consent to such an act, especially for the purposes of profit. So yes, there is indeed a victim.
Besides, your missing the point. The point was that freedom can only exist where the rights of the individual are protected.
myhipsi 1 year ago
@myhipsi This assumes that the child was somehow involved in the transaction between the seller and buyer. They were not. They were involved in the _production_ of the pornography, so a case can be made against the production. However the action of purchasing and selling is removed from the act of producing.
TehBANN3D 1 year ago
@myhipsi Then the answer is to create a situation where consent can occur.
Why are cartoons of "child porn" illegal? Did the ink not consent?
Why is it ok for 23 year old actors to portray teenagers, but its suddenly illegal if those fake teen characters interact sexually?
While child-porn laws are rationalized on "cannot consent", the fact is that they are based on arbitrary moral judgments by busybodies who want to force their views on everyone else at taxpayer expense.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland
I agree with you in the context of what you presented. I don't think it's even practical in this day and age, to have child-porn illegal per se. Since cell phone camera's (sexting, etc.) are so prevelant amongst younger teens and preteens. Eventually, it'll just be unenforcable, due to the shear amount of proliferation. However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal, and that's what I was originally refering to.
myhipsi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@myhipsi "I agree with you in the context of what you presented."
No, you don't.
"However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal"
Why? Why can't the actors sell their time? The producers sell their product? Why must you make any distinction what so ever between "civil" and "commercial"?
Either someone is harmed, or they're not. A murderer is no less a murderer because they didn't do it for money.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@blogegog, raw milk (milk as it is found in nature and as it has been consumed for thousands of years worldwide) is MUCH better for you than pasteurized milk when it is handled correctly. Small farms can do this. Big agriculture can't.
It is big agriculture that demonizes raw milk because small farmers are their competitors. Big agriculture also lobbies politicians to pass laws outlawing raw milk for the "safety" of the public when they are just protecting their interests, not ours.
caraclaudel 1 year ago
@caraclaudel I don't agree with you, though you might be right. If you've ever milked a cow by hand, you know that there is a VERY good chance you're going to get a bit of cow poop in the bucket from their nasty tail flopping around, even if you have it pinned down with your body.
It's probably possible to avoid this 100% of the time, but how do you know the supplier DID avoid it? And raw milk can be pasteurized quite cheaply. Pennies per gallon. It doesn't lock ppl out of the market.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
Raw milk producers run their dairies the same way everyone else does, just with one less procedural step. Portraying them as yokels hand-milking cows is extremely disingenuous and shows that you aren't capable of properly debating this subject.
17Spartacus76 1 year ago
@17Spartacus76 Really? It seemed like we were having a friendly and spirited debate before you showed up spart. Why so angry?
But if you believe that the only difference is the one procedural step, then you disprove the notion that small farms can't afford to do it. I see tremendous harm in allowing raw milk onto the market (the largest being listeria outbreaks). Where are the benefits?
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
You were strawmanning. That's not a debate.
Small farms can't afford to do what? Pasteurize? Where, pray tell, did I ever suggest such a stupid idea? You really need to work on your debating skills.
Pasteurization is known to destroy dozens of compounds in milk that not only kill pathogens, but make it even more nutritious. You're clearly arguing from a state of ignorance. There is no evidence, anywhere, that raw milk is any more dangerous than any other food.
17Spartacus76 1 year ago
@blogegog
Frankly, I could care less though. I don't even drink milk, it's baby food.
I just have a problem with irrational and fearful people using the state to get their way.
17Spartacus76 1 year ago
@blogegog Or sometimes, the cow just steps in the bucket. It's pretty disgusting. It's possible, again, that the farmer would simply throw away that milk, but it's not likely. No one likes to throw away money.
I'm not trying to down dairy farmers. I'm just saying there are some good bacteriological reasons to pasteurize. Though I guess that if the people are FULLY informed of the risks, I would side with you guys. I'd like to read the waiver first though.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog I'm still reeling from being called a yokel because I milk my cows :(. Eh. I'll probably get over it.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog Yeah, small farms do not hand milk, they milk using a machine and a sterile container. Second off, the active enzymes in milk are denatured during pasteurization. This destroys a lot of the health associated with milk. Bacteria is a risk, but that is a risk the consumer must have the choice of making. Whether or not they are fully informed by your standards is irrelevant as markets can only function where individuals are allowed to act on their preferences.
TehBANN3D 1 year ago
@blogegog, raw milk can be pasteurized cheaply, but the point of raw milk is that is hasn't been pasteurized. It contains the enzymes and healthy bacteria we thrive on.
There's a raw milk movement in the country as many want to return to less processed foods. For those who are interested, look up Sally Fallon and RealMilk.
The main point, though, is that we need LIBERTY so we can each live as we see fit. You want pasteurized and I want raw milk? In a free country, that should be fine.
caraclaudel 1 year ago
@caraclaudel I'm pro-liberty & want to be on your side. But at the same time, I'm pro-safety. Not nanny state level safety. Just common sense safety. I would posit that you and I both know enough about raw milk to make an informed decision. But I would also say that most of the people who signed those waivers don't. They hear 'natural' or 'organic' and just assume it means 'good'. In this case, it certainly does NOT.
How do you propose to protect those not in the know? Or do you at all?
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog, I believe pasteurized milk is the more dangerous of the two, as the things that make milk good for us have been killed by the pasteurization process.
Humans have been drinking raw milk for thousands of years. It's not a dangerous substance, though we've been taught for years that it is.
The government often grabs our freedoms in the name of protecting us, when they're actually harming us. Even when they have good intentions, they're often wrong. That's why freedom is so important.
caraclaudel 1 year ago
@caraclaudel All you need to do is boil the milk and take/save the cream it goes to the top. If taste is to strong for you, you can mix it with water. Is healthier than what you get in the supermarket. Raw Milk is real milk, I don’t get WTF are this people supporting, they probably have not seen a cow in their live.... McDonalds fans ;-D
fitobcnfito 1 year ago
@blogegog
Why do you purposely misinform readers here?
ReasonTV has *never* advocated the ingestion of marjuana (weed). They rightfully promote the idea of self-responsible action that includes the *decision* to smoke or otherwise use hemp based products. You don't seem to know much about mass produced milk either. It's the factory version of commercial milk, the stuff you find on retail chain grocers shelves, that is overly laden with harmful bacteria having removed the natural disinfectants.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
@maskedphrogg You really need to google 'listeria'. You're spreading dangerous misinformation.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
You should open up the book _1984_ by George Orwell.
Like the "screens" that inundate the public squares in that book, you loudly make claims but never present supporting evidence. Is it because you can't find the evidence or the more likely case that you know what you claim is false but you believe you stand to benefit from others relying on and giving vocal support also to your false claims.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
@maskedphrogg I can't present evidence in the youtube comment section, so just like yourself, I haven't presented evidence. I can only hope to convince you to do some research. You know, read about milk-borne diseases. You seem unwilling to do that though. So be it.
For the record, your decision to drink milk in any form will have no effect upon my life, beneficial or detrimental.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
You made an outright claim that ReasonTV promotes the *use* of marijuana. Couch it in whatever terms you want now, but that claim in and of itself brands you a liar. You seem to ignore the fact that their videos are here and available publicly. That you would so blatantly lie about that subject, ReasonTV promotes smoking weed, leads reasonable people to be suspicious of any other claims you make. Shill for outlawing healthy food all you want, not all will fall for your sham.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
In retrospect you are unwilling to debate the topic with supporting evidence. In case you hadn't noticed, there is a substantial volume of discussion here in YouTube and millions of posts that present evidence and debate the merits of arguments. I suggest you start being honest with yourself so you can then be honest in the arguments you make to others. You have made claims and now seem to think you can deny that discussion is even possible, we are to just accept your conclusions w/o debate.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
@maskedphrogg Thank you for putting words into my mouth and then complaining that those words were lies. you would make a great politician. For the DNC at least.
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
Here's a clue, put some words in your own mouth. You continue to refuse to support your claim that ReasonTV promotes the "smoking of weed" and you also refuse to refute the claim that raw milk is healthy.
All I and a few others have done is identify you as a shill for outlawing healthy food and I have additionally accused you of knowingly lying about the motives and actions of ReasonTV. We name specific statements you made and point to their invalidity. All you do is bleat adhominem.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
Don't touch the bunny...
daveyg07 1 year ago 2
I think this video reaffirms my love for Reason: my friends and I frequently mocked Nicholas Cage movies, especially Con Air. Why couldn't you just put the bunny back in the box...?
heyniceaddress 1 year ago
I'm not looking forward to the next time I have to fly. I'm going to demand a pat down, but only if the person who does it is female and straight.
I mean, I'm a 5'3 Western GIRL. I might be brownish/beigish, but seriously.
I just feel sorry for my dear brother. He looks like such a terrorist... He already gets stopped in every single airport. Now I guess he's going to get a gloved hand up his rear at every stop. WE'RE NOT EVEN THE RIGHT KIND OF BROWN PEOPLE!
AshillaBeige 1 year ago 2
Awesome!
On the bright side--it's easy to explain how the Federal government has us by the cojones when they literally grab us by the cojones.
TSA = Travelers Sexually Assaulted
MrPloppy1 1 year ago
Wish Reason had the money to purchase a 30 second spot on national television. Don't know if using clips from a movie would fly on an ad though. Might want to remind air ports they can legally kick TSA out if they want.
libertyfizz 1 year ago
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! This is epic !
mosquewatcher 1 year ago
Support Ron Paul's "American Traveler Dignity Act" and support the National Opt-Out Day!
campusliberty1 1 year ago 55
So I guess this new set of procedures is supposed to be less offensive than behavioral profiling? If so, I don't see it.
elsquibbs 1 year ago
LOL
macpduff 1 year ago
Touch
Someone's
A-hole
Obamination2001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Obamination2001: "Touch Someone's A-hole"
That’s next on the government’s agenda. :D
PoliticallyBlazed 1 year ago 3
haha epic...
Voy2378 1 year ago
ctrl w
entropyness 1 year ago
@entropyness Close Window? What does that have to do with anything. Hiding the problem does not make it go away.
Zarggg 1 year ago
Viva las Vegas
darkwhitedirewolf 1 year ago
aren't you proud to live in the land of the free?
LunkwillFook 1 year ago
Perfect!!!!!
Lets go viral!!!!!!
Reason reason rah rah rah
FairEnterprise 1 year ago