I really don't like her way of singing verses. If you listen to the original studio track, you can hear Johan "chasing the drums" kind of singing in the verse. On the other hand she does it like its fucking rap...
@Carep0Lice Yeah but he was shit. He couldnt sing. He just shouted, which was rubbish. Angela is a better vocalist but i agree the way she phrases her vocals on alot of the old shit is kina poor.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes, Arch Enemy is real metal, it's melodic and extremely heavy. Too way better than Sadus, Destruction, Possessed, Vulcano, Helhammer, Bathory and Sarcofago. These bands are just noise without any technique. You have to know about music to make a metal song, and Arch Enemy knows about it.
as well as angela's perhaps not that able to sing Liiva songs, then He's not ale to sing angela's songs!
the albums since wages of sin has been really single-minded unfortionatley, good, but boring. Its a shame, I think that Angela's great, though I think that she's a better live vocalist than she is on studio-material!
YOU WANT TO SEE REAL BLACK DARK SATANIC HELLBOUND CHAOTIC DESTRUCTIVE POSSESSED UNHOLY SINGING? LOOK UP "FUNNY GUY SINGS PSYCHOSOCIAL" ALMOST 1,000,000 VIEWS HELP US REACH THE MILLION MY METAL BROTHERS AND SISTERS!
ARCH ENEMY WILL BE BACK IN THE STUDIONRECORDING A NEW ALBUM SET TO BE RELEASED LATE 2011 OFFICIAL NEWS SOURCE FROM YOUTUBE VIDEO REPORT ON ARCH ENEMY AND IT'S PLANS
I dont hate Angela, I thought Wages of Sin was a good album but everything after that bored the shit out of me, I like the stuff with johan better. The point im trying to make is she cant and never will do a good job singing the stuff that he did. The band shouldnt allow her to "cover" the songs he did and its a shame that they do because they sound terrible. Oh and her cover of incarnated solvent abuse from carcass was atrocious, Carcass is my favorite band of all time and she ruined that song.
The live sound is too squeaky clean for me, it doesn't have that live distorted feel to it, though yeah I'd kill to see Arch Enemy and Johan Liiva do a one time reunion gig.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@StumpsforLimbs Hahahaha I'd have to agree with you on this one! Johan has a very different vocal pattern than Angela. Johan has the fast-paced old-school vocal pattern while Angela has the well enunciated vocal style. But for this song, Angela screwed up the vocals - at least for those who know this song really well. But I love both of them! Arch Enemy is Arch Enemy either old or current.
@StumpsforLimbs who the fuck was arch enemy before angela? i've been listening to bands like arch enemy for a VERY long time and arch enemy sucked big balls before angela. without her they would still be what they were before her = nobody.....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Who are you to say what metal really is ? And who cares ? Arch Enemy is way more metal than Nightwish or shit like that.
The guys of Arch Enemy make good music, but I'm sure it's all about Angela Gossow...She's a woman, she can't be "FVCKING TRVE". C'mon guys, get a life...and a dick.
Not alot of people understand metal,lol they say its just dark and chaotic,well its true,but also not true :o,listen to the music,and try to understand it =/
@gayfeminist Who tell u the new Arch Enemy is not good? I dont see any bad album since the Wages of Sin. The man in the band is not Gossow, its Amott. DOesnt matter who sing really. As long as Amott is there, its Arch Enemy.
If u compare Arch Enemy from this (2006) to 1996 Live in Chile(get it from Youtube), this is played so much better
Both Angela and Liiva sings this song great, but I do believe Angela has brought it a new dimension, and I'm thrilled that they re-recorded the old classics with better quality and Angela singing!
guey? aweonao seguro tienes menos de 25 años. La raza de pendejitos poser que gustan de musica weona llorona y emo. Escucha CARCASS wey pa que veas la diferencia.
La mina canta pésimo. El grupo tiene que tocar lento pa que la mina no se pierda. Arch Enemy fue siempre brutalidad técnica y velocidad...todo se perdió.....lástima.
@crazyaddict666 Arch enemy real metal ? In my opinion the true metal is dark and chaotic feelings very distanced from commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness, which exist nowadays... Sadus, Destruction, Possesed, Vulcano, Hellhammer , Bathory, Sarcofago(inri) are the best.
@DEAD666able you could say that but then again who is to decide what is hypocrtitical chaotic or pretentious? You? Metal like every other genre in music has its characteristics which make it what it is, this band undoubtably has it thus it is metal whether you like it or not. Something not being the kind of metal you like does not make it stop being metal...just like when thrash metal first kicked off there were the sabbath and deep purple fans claiming it was not 'real' metal, as with them you
@METALIZEDPAGAN This obsession with image reminds me of the likes of Britney Spears and co..metal is a GENRE OF MUSIC not a fashion label no matter how much you may want it to be. You can dress in a suit and tie and play metal music and guess what? The music would still be metal!
@METALIZEDPAGAN Im not sure what you dont understand here I have made it very clear...You talk about metal as though its a fashion label rather than a genre of music, just obsessing over the image and clothing types completely overlooking the music aspect. It reminds me of pop 'stars' like Britney Spears and co who are similarly all about the image.
I like Priest, Sabbath, Maiden, Saxon and co, but that does not stop me being able to see that arch enemy like it or not IS a metal band, just
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Angela plastic barbie gossow is the worst ! Arch enemy started sucking when she joined. She´s a classic exaample of stupid metal bitches, for example the wages of sin album and nemesis track are bulshit
@metallica8deth lol, I have to agree if you don't like angela gossow fronted Arch Enemy then leave, msmetalhead100 that is your opinion, if you can't deal with other peoples opinions then get the fuck out, you make fans of metal look like ignorant whining retards, lol
@METALIZEDPAGAN because they dont wear the kind of clothes you want them to does not for a second stop them being so and your constant references to just image make it appear as though you are just a poser who doesnt give a damn about the music and just wants to look 'brutal'. Its people like that which make metal impossible to take seriously from outsiders, your obsession with image degrades the whole genre to the level of pop music and silly trends.
@METALIZEDPAGAN Presumably you mean the band ' Disaster' not desaster? They seem pretty cool but Testament will always been my favourite thrash metal band, to me none come even slightly close to them.
Reread your comments and then try and tell me you were not talking of metal as though it is merely a fashion statement, ALL you talked about was image, its very cringeworthy...
I like arch enemy primarily because I like good guitar playing, I dont care much for the vocals but the Amott brothers
@METALIZEDPAGAN In particular Chris are some of the best guitar players to hit the metal scene in decades, they have some of the most oustanding solos. To get as good as they are you have to practice very very hard, they would not do that unless they had a very strong passion for what they are doing which to me is alot more genuine than some rabid idiot obsessing about the fact that they dont wear enough spikes or leather.
As I already stated, like it or not Arch enemy IS a metal band.
@METALIZEDPAGAN Oh and one more thing, the band disaster appear to have a very very strong punk influence in their songs..so whilst they are certainly metal they are not as rooted in the metal genre as a band like Arch Enemy are. Remember this entire debate kicked off because some moron said arch enemy were not metal because they did not dress like a metal band and had pretty guitar parts...the fact that maiden, priest, sabbath etc also have pretty guitar parts was clearly lost on him.
@MetalguitarlessonsUK arch enemy had few good jobs(are not my personal taste) in the past with the old vocalist ( however, there were best death metal bands(90-95)
when I said arch is shit I mean some of them = new arch enemy
@MetalguitarlessonsUK 10% is punk 90% is metal listen a touch of medieval darkness of desater . gossow sings bad. The group has to play slow for gossow is not lost. Arch Enemy was always technical brutality and speed ... all was lost
@METALIZEDPAGAN You really are coming across as a massive poser rather than a fan of music. Maybe you should listen to bands like My Chemical Romance where fans would be happy to talk about the hairstyles and clothing of the band rather than the music itself? Seeing as that seems to be all you care about.
This is further amplified by the fact that you are spending your time on a video of a band you apparently hate insulting them for their lack of spikes and leather..If you were a true fan why
@METALIZEDPAGAN would you do this? What possible gain could there be? If you really liked metal then you would spend your time listening to and enjoying it rather than purposefully seeking out videos of bands you dislike and getting all worked up about the way they dress...The only possible reason you would do this is if you are obsessed with image (as your comments certainly show) and pretty uninterested in the music itself.
If you want to talk music then talk music, what particular aspect
@METALIZEDPAGAN of the guitar playing in Arch enemy do you take issue with? Why is it not metal? Do you not like their use of harmonic minor scales? Do you not like the use of pedal patterns? Or is it the use of octaves to add an epic quality to the chorus which you take issue with? All these things are very typical of the metal genre so i fail to see how this is not metal or what aspect of the guitar work makes it not metal? So cmon lets hear it, talk music not image..fucking poser.
@ChrissyChiChi arch enemy had few good jobs(are not my personal taste) in the past with the old vocalist ( however, there were best death metal bands(90-95)
when I said arch is shit I mean some of them = new arch enemy
@MetalguitarlessonsUK why do you talk about " obsessing image " ? all comments talk about music !! all genres of metal, maiden, sabbath, judas, motorhead have influences of punk ! why do you recommend My chemical romance? it´s a joke ? go listen The number of the beast, hell awaits, DEATH(scream bloody gore, spiritual healing, more), welcome to hell, under the sign of the black mark, spikes, leather, chains,bullet, METALIZAD BLOOD !!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@msmetalhead100 ...if you cant read english dont post comments in it. If you want to get involved in this discussion reread all the comments I made and all the comments I was responding too, for a start I also preferred arch enemy before angela. YOu obviously have no idea what you are talking about, the people I responded too only talked about image! Constantly going on about having to wear leather, spikes etc.
Its dumbasses like this that are the example of stupid metalheads and are why most
@MetalguitarlessonsUK only you talk about image, all commentes talk about feelings, music, extreme metal and more. Johan is 1000 most better than angela plastic barbie gossow and only black earth , stigmata are good albums ,,wages are shit and the albums after wages of sin are the worst and you know it,,,, who obsess over image and divisiveness as a section of metal community i don´t know but underground metal are not in it
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@msmetalhead100 people think of metal as a genre for idiots. You dont seem to realize how much you guys sound like the britney spears and other pop singers 'fans', just obsessed with image.
Arch Enemy are and always have been primarily a guitar focused band, the vocals are a complete afterthought, its all about the guitars and their playing has undoubtably gotten better and better. Johan was a better singer but an AWFUL frontman, watch old videos with the band, no charisma, out of time etc.
@msmetalhead100 I mentioned my chemical romance as an example of the kind of ridiculous 'fans' you guys sound like.
You want to talk about the band Death? Check out my profile where I explicitly name them as one of my favourite bands and cover their solos. I can guarantee I know more about their songs, how they are constructed, the key signatures they use, inversions, chord progressions, arpeggios, harmonies etc than you who im sure only know and care about their image and lyrics.
@msmetalhead100 ever read an interview with chuck schuldiner? If not I recommend you look some up, he specifically mentions people like you who obsess over image and divisiveness as a section of the metal community he despises. Grow up, listen to what you like and try to get over petty things like what a band does and does not wear or whether they sing about gore or not, there is so much more to music than that.
@DEAD666able are just being another pretentious elitist with an inflated idea of your own opinions..at least thats certainly what it looks like, not all metal needs to be 'black metal'.
@ MetalguitarlessonsUK arch enemy is fashion , the music is easy light, para oidos complacientes , Angela is britney spears + avil lavigne +gutural voice (not so good, no so bad )...maybe, you don´t understand the true extreme, underground, brutal feelings in metal.... yes not all metal needs to be black metal.
@DEAD666able I dont speak spanish so im not sure what you are talking about in some of that comment but if you are saying the music in arch enemy is not technical then you are a fool. Chris Amott is a FAAAAR more technically acomplished guitarist than those in ANY of the bands you mentioned, that is not something open to personal opinion, its just plain fact. To say 'Arch enemy' is fashion implies you dont understand the meaning of the word fashion, look it up. The irony here is that you then
@MetalguitarlessonsUK ..thanks...technical ??..technical is not important..there excelent bands with real feelings ..Nocturnus, Incatation, Massacre, nun slaughter... metal ortodoxo como debe ser.. rudimentario, primitivo, imcomplaciente..not light sweet , pretty...heavy metal is underground, extreme and brutal, technical es secundario..spikes, leather, chains, bullets is not only image...is a feeling...is you think Arch enemy is true metal is your problem..thanks for your opinions
@DEAD666able I mentioned technical because you called the music easy and light then started typing spanish.. Yet again you are not talking about music just your own pettit feelings..metal has to be underground does it? You sound like one of those guys who thinks its cool to only like things which are others dont who instantly hates any band that gets attention...the number of people who like a band has no impact on what genre it is, you are talking complete nonsense. There is no reason metal
@DEAD666able cannot be beautiful or pretty other than that you personally dont like it, you are not talking about music at all. This just black metal you are talking about, one of the great things about metal as a whole is that it is not confined to as many rules as other genres are, it can be beautiful, it can be haunting, it can be brutal, it can be melodic, it can be shocking, it can be moving etc etc etc you are trying to pigeon hole it and destroy alot of what makes it so special due to
@DEAD666able your own closed minded ideas of what is and is not good...so according to you then iron maiden is not metal I take it? They are not particularly 'brutal', have many beautiful and pretty sections and are certainly not underground so they are not metal according to you? What about black sabbath? They have many pretty sections too and are really not brutal when compared with todays bands, so apparently the founders of metal are not a metal band? You are an ignorant fool.
@DEAD666able Way to completely avoid the point I made with that comparison, you said metal had to be underground, extreme, brutal and NOT pretty, bands like sabbath and maiden are none of those things, they are hugely popular, have very pretty and beautiful sections within their songs and are really not that brutal or extreme. With regards to your earlier point im afraid yes 'spikes, leather and chains' ARE image, unless you can tell me how they make music?
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Iron maiden and black sabbath are not pretty light sweet beautiful, , maiden an sabbath influences the actual metal, they are gods, and arch enemy is garbage, se nota por los ritmos facilones y la imagen pacharaca que sirven solo para vender...iron maiden keep in tradicional heavy metal .. iron is popular ??..is the best, se lo merecen por todo el legado que han dejado
@DEAD666able Iron Maiden are not beautiful?? Have you ever heard maiden before? Listen to fear of the dark, no more lies, can i play with madness, wasted years, hell ANY of their tunes and try and say that its not beautiful. Same goes for sabbath, PLENTY of pretty moments, songs like changes, fairies wear boots, snow blind etc.
You are clearly just a poser, who is only into the 'image' of metal but does not give a shit about or really listen to the music at all.
@MetalguitarlessonsUK in your channel i see you have 21 years old and you like slipknot ??, it explains.....i want to say not "beautiful" because maiden is really warrior.. if you don´t understand the true feelings of metal, okey, if your opinion, if you think arch enemy is good "metal", okey, is your opinion..i don´t think so.....sorry I don´t interesting to write you because I´m working a lot, thanks for your time. I go listen the new wave of british heavy metal
@DEAD666able My profile certainly does not say I like slipknot! I teach guitar and use the profile for advertising so whilst I do covers of popular bands like slipknot and muse it does not mean I am a fan of those bands, it just gets me more views and more students, if you want to see what bands I like then check out what I put in the 'music' section..
You have your own feelings of what 'true metal' is but you have contradicted yourself several times and constantly just talk about image not
@DEAD666able music at all so it seems fair to assume you are thus a poser. You only are 'into' metal because you think it makes you extreme and 'brutal' as you put it and you like wearing spikes and leather..fair enough but dont then say that that is all metal is because you do it a great disservice, it is a genre of music not a fashion style. If you are just into image and not music then listen to britney spears or any other popstar.
@AIAPAYEC ...did you really just tell one of your friends to come in and spam me with comments? Or is it just sheer coincidence that this guy happens to be on your friends list :P? If you cant fight your own battles and defend yourself with actual arguments rather than non sequiturs and ad hominums then you probably shouldnt post such silly comments on a bands video and not expect to be taken to task on it..I mean really asking youtube friends to spam me? Ouch I must have really pissed you off!
@DEAD666able describe 'true metal' as 'Chains´n ...leathers´n...bullets´n ....spikes´n METALIZED BLOOD !!!! ' now that IS fashion, similarly with your comparison of angela to britney spears etc. You are not talking about music at all just image, metal is a form of music image has nothing to do with it at all, they could all be wearing suits and ties and it would change nothing, the note choices, rhythmic groupings, structures, tones, set up etc etc are all typical of metal, if you cant hear
@DEAD666able that then clearly it is you who has little understanding of metal and music in general. Stop obsessing over how you want people to look and grow up. As I said right at the start, metal is just a genre of music and like any other genre it has its defining characteristics which make it what it is, Arch enemy undoubtably follow these characteristics and are thus metal, just because you dont like the way they look and dress (or that there is a girl the band, oh NO!) it changes nothing.
But Arch Enemy has no commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness. You can be sure of that. Some melo-death metal bands have some commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness, but not arch enemy!!
Arch Enemy is melo-death, as Dark Tranquillity, In Flames, Kalmah, Hypocrisy, At the Gates, and a lot of more bands. I love melodic death metal. And Arch Enemy does it well, as Dark Tranquillity, they are not comercial. The only comercial on melo-death is the new records of In Flames.
I have a lot of respect for the old death metal stuff, i love altars of madness from morbid angel, and tomb of the mutilated from cannibal corpse, but you have to understand, that A.E is melo-death
@linkinn18 arc enemy was a good metal band, only black earth are really good, but wages of sin(and after it) is very bad album, nemesis , my apocalipsis in my opinion are bullshit, arch enemy lost .... i like obsculum obssenum of hypocrisy, entombed, some works of edge of sanity and at the gates are really good, the first album of dark tranquility is good, well,....one band really good in melodic metal is dissection, "the somberlain" and "storm´s of the light´s bane" are master pieces....
So i see you like the old melodic death metal stuff, not the new one!
I like the new one more, but i still prefere the old american death metal (not melodic). But anyway, you cant call A.E an commercial band. In my opinion, even my dying bride, katatonia and therion (that are bands that really dont have a heavy sound), they are not commercial.
Commercial is something like avenged sevenfold, bullet for my valentine, sonic Syndicate, indica, the new within temptation, lacuna coil...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@DEAD666able metal doesnt have to sound like shit and be "underground" to fit the metal genre. people who stay away from trends musically, are themselves, part of a different but very real trend.you should like what you like because it sounds good OR has a good message. if ANYTHING other than the actual music itself (record deals, fame, money) influences whether you like a band or not than you cant call yourself a music fan.
@Iwetbeds I'm not sure why your comment has so many negative marks...to be a "non-conformist" and strive to be everything the mainstream isn't is just as stupid as it's antithesis. I appreciate that you recognize that. \m/
yo creo la vdd q johal liiva es una cantant exelente porq en canciones como The Immortal en vivo, la vdd si c la afleta porq tal cual es la cancion y alcanza a terminar en tiempo y forma lo unico malo q tiene es q no hace mucho por prender al publico y angela por el contrario en esta cancion si c fijan es mas lenta para q ella alcanze los tiempos, esa cancion la modificaron pero angela si tiende a ser mas explosiva y prender al publico
I think, this song sounds much better with Johan, however, we would never hear again these songs live, and she doesn't sounds bad.
Luismf08 1 month ago in playlist Más vídeos de luxoodarkmaster
Tits or GTFO !
iamrubens 1 month ago
She ruined my favorite Arch Enemy song... se deserves Hades.
blogalanjafidcom 2 months ago
Chris Amott RULES!!
EvilMaiden1 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
HEY HEY HEY HEY!!!! angela rules!!!!
ferknoxd 4 months ago
well they can sing it's never going to sing the songs of the great Johan Liiva, you lose the rhythm of the song at a time and it's terrible
thrashgabriel 6 months ago
Thumbs up if that mini drum intro makes you wanna buy a drum kit :)
Carep0Lice 7 months ago 3
Angela puts down one hell of a song.
constantin131313 7 months ago
Wow, I've never read so many retarded comments...
MarkusSsZ 8 months ago 3
I really don't like her way of singing verses. If you listen to the original studio track, you can hear Johan "chasing the drums" kind of singing in the verse. On the other hand she does it like its fucking rap...
BA-BA-BABA-BA!
Carep0Lice 9 months ago 4
@Carep0Lice Yeah but he was shit. He couldnt sing. He just shouted, which was rubbish. Angela is a better vocalist but i agree the way she phrases her vocals on alot of the old shit is kina poor.
ElJucifer 8 months ago
best guitar solo ever..
pupawka 9 months ago
I like this band and Angela, I won't go as far as to say I love this band, but damn Angela, I'm sorry but only Johan Liiva can sing this song.
Infloun 10 months ago
Damn, u would need a super phantom camera to capture Daniel's moves
RatedRKingofKings 11 months ago
best song ever
FLy1ng 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, Arch Enemy is real metal, it's melodic and extremely heavy. Too way better than Sadus, Destruction, Possessed, Vulcano, Helhammer, Bathory and Sarcofago. These bands are just noise without any technique. You have to know about music to make a metal song, and Arch Enemy knows about it.
darkarbues 1 year ago
@darkarbues Bathory is sick man! So's Arch Enemy.
Obelix5150 1 year ago
as well as angela's perhaps not that able to sing Liiva songs, then He's not ale to sing angela's songs!
the albums since wages of sin has been really single-minded unfortionatley, good, but boring. Its a shame, I think that Angela's great, though I think that she's a better live vocalist than she is on studio-material!
deepfuckinghostile 1 year ago
YOU WANT TO SEE REAL BLACK DARK SATANIC HELLBOUND CHAOTIC DESTRUCTIVE POSSESSED UNHOLY SINGING? LOOK UP "FUNNY GUY SINGS PSYCHOSOCIAL" ALMOST 1,000,000 VIEWS HELP US REACH THE MILLION MY METAL BROTHERS AND SISTERS!
metallica8deth 1 year ago
ARCH ENEMY WILL BE BACK IN THE STUDIONRECORDING A NEW ALBUM SET TO BE RELEASED LATE 2011 OFFICIAL NEWS SOURCE FROM YOUTUBE VIDEO REPORT ON ARCH ENEMY AND IT'S PLANS
metallica8deth 1 year ago
I dont hate Angela, I thought Wages of Sin was a good album but everything after that bored the shit out of me, I like the stuff with johan better. The point im trying to make is she cant and never will do a good job singing the stuff that he did. The band shouldnt allow her to "cover" the songs he did and its a shame that they do because they sound terrible. Oh and her cover of incarnated solvent abuse from carcass was atrocious, Carcass is my favorite band of all time and she ruined that song.
StumpsforLimbs 1 year ago 51
@StumpsforLimbs you´re right i agree
msmetalhead100 1 year ago
@StumpsforLimbs But you gotta think that he did them in the studio and she's doing them live and it sounds alright...
ashzombie13 8 months ago
how can such a beautful women scream so badass .? Love it !
thejinxedcat1 1 year ago
How can you call this comercial metal??
You are fucking dumbasses
Commercial metal is bullet for my valentine!!
Arch Enemy are gods!
linkinn18 1 year ago
LINDO LINDO !!!
arquitetricia 1 year ago
@arquitetricia
E mais LINDO!! :D
linkinn18 1 year ago
Yeah, don´t start to argue, but I prefer this version better.
NightFallsFast1 1 year ago
The live sound is too squeaky clean for me, it doesn't have that live distorted feel to it, though yeah I'd kill to see Arch Enemy and Johan Liiva do a one time reunion gig.
SimAlias 1 year ago
real metal or not,its just your opinion. for me, AE is, if not my favorite,one of my favorite bands. say whatever u want
DjTsakalos 1 year ago
She really needs to leave the old songs alone, they sound like crap when she sings them, she could never touch Johan.
StumpsforLimbs 1 year ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@StumpsforLimbs Hahahaha I'd have to agree with you on this one! Johan has a very different vocal pattern than Angela. Johan has the fast-paced old-school vocal pattern while Angela has the well enunciated vocal style. But for this song, Angela screwed up the vocals - at least for those who know this song really well. But I love both of them! Arch Enemy is Arch Enemy either old or current.
Demonvoid 1 year ago
@StumpsforLimbs Like she is the one making those choices. She does a great job. Besides they were nothing with Johan on the mic.
drumtum 1 year ago
@StumpsforLimbs Have you actualy listened to him? He has always had a Jasta-ish voice. It's shit!
HabeasMortis 1 year ago
@StumpsforLimbs who the fuck was arch enemy before angela? i've been listening to bands like arch enemy for a VERY long time and arch enemy sucked big balls before angela. without her they would still be what they were before her = nobody.....
johnson32darren 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who are you to say what metal really is ? And who cares ? Arch Enemy is way more metal than Nightwish or shit like that.
The guys of Arch Enemy make good music, but I'm sure it's all about Angela Gossow...She's a woman, she can't be "FVCKING TRVE". C'mon guys, get a life...and a dick.
AngryUrukHai 1 year ago
Not alot of people understand metal,lol they say its just dark and chaotic,well its true,but also not true :o,listen to the music,and try to understand it =/
Kyokuchiki 1 year ago
Awesome band !
Angela have great voice on live *___*
xXLawlietStrifeXx 1 year ago
arch enemy had few good jobs(are not my personal taste) in the past with the old vocalist ( however, there were best death metal bands(90-95)
when I said arch is shit I mean some of them = new arch enemy
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN okey my friend i´m BORING of it
arch is a bad band i´m not interested about any of their work (inlude the old works)
arch was a death metal band but they went to shit
please send me others videos
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
Judas priest introduced the use of leather chains spikes
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
the old arch enemy was good, well, some, but the new arch enemy with angela gossow is shit,
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@AIAPAYEC I agree with you, old arch enemy was good(a bit in my opinion) but the new arch enemy with gossow is not good
gayfeminist 1 year ago
@gayfeminist Who tell u the new Arch Enemy is not good? I dont see any bad album since the Wages of Sin. The man in the band is not Gossow, its Amott. DOesnt matter who sing really. As long as Amott is there, its Arch Enemy.
If u compare Arch Enemy from this (2006) to 1996 Live in Chile(get it from Youtube), this is played so much better
r9duc 1 year ago
@r9duc je,je , I prefer much more to Brutality and Dissection
gayfeminist 1 year ago
3:22-3:24 Angela is sizzling hot!
Both Angela and Liiva sings this song great, but I do believe Angela has brought it a new dimension, and I'm thrilled that they re-recorded the old classics with better quality and Angela singing!
HyPreA 2 years ago 2
2:39 - awesome!
Finrod888 2 years ago
guey? aweonao seguro tienes menos de 25 años. La raza de pendejitos poser que gustan de musica weona llorona y emo. Escucha CARCASS wey pa que veas la diferencia.
cadaver001 2 years ago
Ok this DVD is a must-have.
neuroelite 2 years ago 2
the angela's voice sounds amasing in this DVD i love her
lowest666 2 years ago
La mina canta pésimo. El grupo tiene que tocar lento pa que la mina no se pierda. Arch Enemy fue siempre brutalidad técnica y velocidad...todo se perdió.....lástima.
cadaver001 2 years ago
hablai puras weas...
magoalbo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
callate guey. no sabes tu de musica. u dont know shit u lame ass poser. ARCH ENEMY 4 LIFE!
crazyaddict666 2 years ago
@crazyaddict666 Arch enemy real metal ? In my opinion the true metal is dark and chaotic feelings very distanced from commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness, which exist nowadays... Sadus, Destruction, Possesed, Vulcano, Hellhammer , Bathory, Sarcofago(inri) are the best.
DEAD666able 1 year ago 88
@DEAD666able you could say that but then again who is to decide what is hypocrtitical chaotic or pretentious? You? Metal like every other genre in music has its characteristics which make it what it is, this band undoubtably has it thus it is metal whether you like it or not. Something not being the kind of metal you like does not make it stop being metal...just like when thrash metal first kicked off there were the sabbath and deep purple fans claiming it was not 'real' metal, as with them you
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Spikes´n Metalized blood
Chain´s Metalized blood
Bullets´n Metalized blood
Leather´n Metalized Blood
Desaster band "Hellfire´s dominion" album, METALIZED BLOOD track
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago 5
@METALIZEDPAGAN This obsession with image reminds me of the likes of Britney Spears and co..metal is a GENRE OF MUSIC not a fashion label no matter how much you may want it to be. You can dress in a suit and tie and play metal music and guess what? The music would still be metal!
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK obsession ? sorry i don´t understand i like hellfire dominiun of Desaster,don´t you like it?
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN Im not sure what you dont understand here I have made it very clear...You talk about metal as though its a fashion label rather than a genre of music, just obsessing over the image and clothing types completely overlooking the music aspect. It reminds me of pop 'stars' like Britney Spears and co who are similarly all about the image.
I like Priest, Sabbath, Maiden, Saxon and co, but that does not stop me being able to see that arch enemy like it or not IS a metal band, just
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Angela plastic barbie gossow is the worst ! Arch enemy started sucking when she joined. She´s a classic exaample of stupid metal bitches, for example the wages of sin album and nemesis track are bulshit
msmetalhead100 1 year ago 16
@msmetalhead100 IF YOU DON'T LIKE HER GET THE FUCK OUT!
metallica8deth 1 year ago
@metallica8deth lol, I have to agree if you don't like angela gossow fronted Arch Enemy then leave, msmetalhead100 that is your opinion, if you can't deal with other peoples opinions then get the fuck out, you make fans of metal look like ignorant whining retards, lol
DeathMagick1 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN because they dont wear the kind of clothes you want them to does not for a second stop them being so and your constant references to just image make it appear as though you are just a poser who doesnt give a damn about the music and just wants to look 'brutal'. Its people like that which make metal impossible to take seriously from outsiders, your obsession with image degrades the whole genre to the level of pop music and silly trends.
Understand now?
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK fashion obsession?
sorry but I do not know anything about fashion in dress perhaps you do know
I never mention the metal genre as a fashion brand
others do not mean I think as I agree with other comments is that arch enemy is bullshit
if you like arch enemy okey
I only mention you the band Desaster
I like Judas saxon, maiden Sabbath too
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN Presumably you mean the band ' Disaster' not desaster? They seem pretty cool but Testament will always been my favourite thrash metal band, to me none come even slightly close to them.
Reread your comments and then try and tell me you were not talking of metal as though it is merely a fashion statement, ALL you talked about was image, its very cringeworthy...
I like arch enemy primarily because I like good guitar playing, I dont care much for the vocals but the Amott brothers
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN In particular Chris are some of the best guitar players to hit the metal scene in decades, they have some of the most oustanding solos. To get as good as they are you have to practice very very hard, they would not do that unless they had a very strong passion for what they are doing which to me is alot more genuine than some rabid idiot obsessing about the fact that they dont wear enough spikes or leather.
As I already stated, like it or not Arch enemy IS a metal band.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN Oh and one more thing, the band disaster appear to have a very very strong punk influence in their songs..so whilst they are certainly metal they are not as rooted in the metal genre as a band like Arch Enemy are. Remember this entire debate kicked off because some moron said arch enemy were not metal because they did not dress like a metal band and had pretty guitar parts...the fact that maiden, priest, sabbath etc also have pretty guitar parts was clearly lost on him.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalguitarlessonsUK arch enemy had few good jobs(are not my personal taste) in the past with the old vocalist ( however, there were best death metal bands(90-95)
when I said arch is shit I mean some of them = new arch enemy
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK 10% is punk 90% is metal listen a touch of medieval darkness of desater . gossow sings bad. The group has to play slow for gossow is not lost. Arch Enemy was always technical brutality and speed ... all was lost
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago 8
@METALIZEDPAGAN You really are coming across as a massive poser rather than a fan of music. Maybe you should listen to bands like My Chemical Romance where fans would be happy to talk about the hairstyles and clothing of the band rather than the music itself? Seeing as that seems to be all you care about.
This is further amplified by the fact that you are spending your time on a video of a band you apparently hate insulting them for their lack of spikes and leather..If you were a true fan why
ChrissyChiChi 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN would you do this? What possible gain could there be? If you really liked metal then you would spend your time listening to and enjoying it rather than purposefully seeking out videos of bands you dislike and getting all worked up about the way they dress...The only possible reason you would do this is if you are obsessed with image (as your comments certainly show) and pretty uninterested in the music itself.
If you want to talk music then talk music, what particular aspect
ChrissyChiChi 1 year ago
@METALIZEDPAGAN of the guitar playing in Arch enemy do you take issue with? Why is it not metal? Do you not like their use of harmonic minor scales? Do you not like the use of pedal patterns? Or is it the use of octaves to add an epic quality to the chorus which you take issue with? All these things are very typical of the metal genre so i fail to see how this is not metal or what aspect of the guitar work makes it not metal? So cmon lets hear it, talk music not image..fucking poser.
ChrissyChiChi 1 year ago
@ChrissyChiChi I only mention desaster because I saw comments that mentioned spikes, leather, etc
leather, chains, etc is a track of them and also has a symbolic meaning in my opinion
I just think arch enemy is bullshit (not only music)
if you like some of them welcome you are a musician i am not a musician
I have a different opinion of what is the metal that is not the same as other comments
I'm just saying my opinion does not impose anything
if others want to impose is a matter for them
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@ChrissyChiChi arch enemy had few good jobs(are not my personal taste) in the past with the old vocalist ( however, there were best death metal bands(90-95)
when I said arch is shit I mean some of them = new arch enemy
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago 4
@MetalguitarlessonsUK i dress in a suit and tie
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK why do you talk about " obsessing image " ? all comments talk about music !! all genres of metal, maiden, sabbath, judas, motorhead have influences of punk ! why do you recommend My chemical romance? it´s a joke ? go listen The number of the beast, hell awaits, DEATH(scream bloody gore, spiritual healing, more), welcome to hell, under the sign of the black mark, spikes, leather, chains,bullet, METALIZAD BLOOD !!
msmetalhead100 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@msmetalhead100 ...if you cant read english dont post comments in it. If you want to get involved in this discussion reread all the comments I made and all the comments I was responding too, for a start I also preferred arch enemy before angela. YOu obviously have no idea what you are talking about, the people I responded too only talked about image! Constantly going on about having to wear leather, spikes etc.
Its dumbasses like this that are the example of stupid metalheads and are why most
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK only you talk about image, all commentes talk about feelings, music, extreme metal and more. Johan is 1000 most better than angela plastic barbie gossow and only black earth , stigmata are good albums ,,wages are shit and the albums after wages of sin are the worst and you know it,,,, who obsess over image and divisiveness as a section of metal community i don´t know but underground metal are not in it
msmetalhead100 1 year ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@msmetalhead100 people think of metal as a genre for idiots. You dont seem to realize how much you guys sound like the britney spears and other pop singers 'fans', just obsessed with image.
Arch Enemy are and always have been primarily a guitar focused band, the vocals are a complete afterthought, its all about the guitars and their playing has undoubtably gotten better and better. Johan was a better singer but an AWFUL frontman, watch old videos with the band, no charisma, out of time etc.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@msmetalhead100 I mentioned my chemical romance as an example of the kind of ridiculous 'fans' you guys sound like.
You want to talk about the band Death? Check out my profile where I explicitly name them as one of my favourite bands and cover their solos. I can guarantee I know more about their songs, how they are constructed, the key signatures they use, inversions, chord progressions, arpeggios, harmonies etc than you who im sure only know and care about their image and lyrics.
Have you
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK man .. you don´t know anything about metal and you don´t anything about metal extreme underground ok stay in your ignorance
metalking60 2 months ago
@msmetalhead100 ever read an interview with chuck schuldiner? If not I recommend you look some up, he specifically mentions people like you who obsess over image and divisiveness as a section of the metal community he despises. Grow up, listen to what you like and try to get over petty things like what a band does and does not wear or whether they sing about gore or not, there is so much more to music than that.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able are just being another pretentious elitist with an inflated idea of your own opinions..at least thats certainly what it looks like, not all metal needs to be 'black metal'.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@ MetalguitarlessonsUK arch enemy is fashion , the music is easy light, para oidos complacientes , Angela is britney spears + avil lavigne +gutural voice (not so good, no so bad )...maybe, you don´t understand the true extreme, underground, brutal feelings in metal.... yes not all metal needs to be black metal.
Chains´n ...leathers´n...bullets´n ....spikes´n METALIZED BLOOD !!!!
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able I dont speak spanish so im not sure what you are talking about in some of that comment but if you are saying the music in arch enemy is not technical then you are a fool. Chris Amott is a FAAAAR more technically acomplished guitarist than those in ANY of the bands you mentioned, that is not something open to personal opinion, its just plain fact. To say 'Arch enemy' is fashion implies you dont understand the meaning of the word fashion, look it up. The irony here is that you then
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK ..thanks...technical ??..technical is not important..there excelent bands with real feelings ..Nocturnus, Incatation, Massacre, nun slaughter... metal ortodoxo como debe ser.. rudimentario, primitivo, imcomplaciente..not light sweet , pretty...heavy metal is underground, extreme and brutal, technical es secundario..spikes, leather, chains, bullets is not only image...is a feeling...is you think Arch enemy is true metal is your problem..thanks for your opinions
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able I mentioned technical because you called the music easy and light then started typing spanish.. Yet again you are not talking about music just your own pettit feelings..metal has to be underground does it? You sound like one of those guys who thinks its cool to only like things which are others dont who instantly hates any band that gets attention...the number of people who like a band has no impact on what genre it is, you are talking complete nonsense. There is no reason metal
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able cannot be beautiful or pretty other than that you personally dont like it, you are not talking about music at all. This just black metal you are talking about, one of the great things about metal as a whole is that it is not confined to as many rules as other genres are, it can be beautiful, it can be haunting, it can be brutal, it can be melodic, it can be shocking, it can be moving etc etc etc you are trying to pigeon hole it and destroy alot of what makes it so special due to
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able your own closed minded ideas of what is and is not good...so according to you then iron maiden is not metal I take it? They are not particularly 'brutal', have many beautiful and pretty sections and are certainly not underground so they are not metal according to you? What about black sabbath? They have many pretty sections too and are really not brutal when compared with todays bands, so apparently the founders of metal are not a metal band? You are an ignorant fool.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK do you compare iron maiden and black sabbath ( cults for me ) with Arch enemy ???...please...
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able Way to completely avoid the point I made with that comparison, you said metal had to be underground, extreme, brutal and NOT pretty, bands like sabbath and maiden are none of those things, they are hugely popular, have very pretty and beautiful sections within their songs and are really not that brutal or extreme. With regards to your earlier point im afraid yes 'spikes, leather and chains' ARE image, unless you can tell me how they make music?
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Iron maiden and black sabbath are not pretty light sweet beautiful, , maiden an sabbath influences the actual metal, they are gods, and arch enemy is garbage, se nota por los ritmos facilones y la imagen pacharaca que sirven solo para vender...iron maiden keep in tradicional heavy metal .. iron is popular ??..is the best, se lo merecen por todo el legado que han dejado
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able Iron Maiden are not beautiful?? Have you ever heard maiden before? Listen to fear of the dark, no more lies, can i play with madness, wasted years, hell ANY of their tunes and try and say that its not beautiful. Same goes for sabbath, PLENTY of pretty moments, songs like changes, fairies wear boots, snow blind etc.
You are clearly just a poser, who is only into the 'image' of metal but does not give a shit about or really listen to the music at all.
Go listen to pop music.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK in your channel i see you have 21 years old and you like slipknot ??, it explains.....i want to say not "beautiful" because maiden is really warrior.. if you don´t understand the true feelings of metal, okey, if your opinion, if you think arch enemy is good "metal", okey, is your opinion..i don´t think so.....sorry I don´t interesting to write you because I´m working a lot, thanks for your time. I go listen the new wave of british heavy metal
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able My profile certainly does not say I like slipknot! I teach guitar and use the profile for advertising so whilst I do covers of popular bands like slipknot and muse it does not mean I am a fan of those bands, it just gets me more views and more students, if you want to see what bands I like then check out what I put in the 'music' section..
You have your own feelings of what 'true metal' is but you have contradicted yourself several times and constantly just talk about image not
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able music at all so it seems fair to assume you are thus a poser. You only are 'into' metal because you think it makes you extreme and 'brutal' as you put it and you like wearing spikes and leather..fair enough but dont then say that that is all metal is because you do it a great disservice, it is a genre of music not a fashion style. If you are just into image and not music then listen to britney spears or any other popstar.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK yes !! i go listen arch enemy fashion pop star ...ja,ja,ja
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@AIAPAYEC ...did you really just tell one of your friends to come in and spam me with comments? Or is it just sheer coincidence that this guy happens to be on your friends list :P? If you cant fight your own battles and defend yourself with actual arguments rather than non sequiturs and ad hominums then you probably shouldnt post such silly comments on a bands video and not expect to be taken to task on it..I mean really asking youtube friends to spam me? Ouch I must have really pissed you off!
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK oh no!!!.....the little musician virtuous knows a alot and knows a lot of music and listen pure shit arch enemy !!!, ja,ja,ja
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK Iron maiden and Black sabbath were underground, extreme and brutal for the time they lived ( in the past)
Bruce Dickinson used to wear leather and spikes
Judas Priest was who introduced the use of leather and spikes
gayfeminist 1 year ago 15
@gayfeminist why do you mention black sabbath and iron maiden ???
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK do you made covers of slipknot ???......ja,ja,ajjjjjaaaa,ja,ja !!!!!
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK do you made covers of slipknot ???......ja,ja,ajjjjjaaaa,ja,ja !!!!!
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK yes !!! go listen arch enemy fashion pop star !!!!
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@DEAD666able you´re right, angela is britney spears , i only want her pussy because her music is pure shit, ja,ja
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@DEAD666able describe 'true metal' as 'Chains´n ...leathers´n...bullets´n ....spikes´n METALIZED BLOOD !!!! ' now that IS fashion, similarly with your comparison of angela to britney spears etc. You are not talking about music at all just image, metal is a form of music image has nothing to do with it at all, they could all be wearing suits and ties and it would change nothing, the note choices, rhythmic groupings, structures, tones, set up etc etc are all typical of metal, if you cant hear
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able that then clearly it is you who has little understanding of metal and music in general. Stop obsessing over how you want people to look and grow up. As I said right at the start, metal is just a genre of music and like any other genre it has its defining characteristics which make it what it is, Arch enemy undoubtably follow these characteristics and are thus metal, just because you dont like the way they look and dress (or that there is a girl the band, oh NO!) it changes nothing.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@DEAD666able Arch enemy is bullshit not real death metal
you´re right gossow is madonna britney spears
sadus possesed vulcano brutality are the best
METALIZEDPAGAN 1 year ago
@DEAD666able do you say it is not real metal ?? ja,ja,ja there is some truth in that ,,ja,ja,ja
please send me only old school death metal videos my friend
AIAPAYEC 1 year ago
@DEAD666able arch enemy commercial metal? haha ur funny
Stupidsquire 1 year ago
@Stupidsquire arch enemy is not underground metal
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able
But Arch Enemy has no commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness. You can be sure of that. Some melo-death metal bands have some commercial and hypocritical pretentiousness, but not arch enemy!!
linkinn18 1 year ago
@linkinn18 arch enemy is not underground metal , it´s a comercial band, arch enemy are not gods,,,the true gods of death metal are
morbid angel (old) - "altar of madness" "blessed are the sick"
Death(kam lee and chuck) - "scream bloody gore" "spiritual healing" and others
massacre(usa, kam lee) - "from beyond"
DEAD666able 1 year ago
@DEAD666able
Arch Enemy is melo-death, as Dark Tranquillity, In Flames, Kalmah, Hypocrisy, At the Gates, and a lot of more bands. I love melodic death metal. And Arch Enemy does it well, as Dark Tranquillity, they are not comercial. The only comercial on melo-death is the new records of In Flames.
I have a lot of respect for the old death metal stuff, i love altars of madness from morbid angel, and tomb of the mutilated from cannibal corpse, but you have to understand, that A.E is melo-death
linkinn18 1 year ago
@linkinn18 arc enemy was a good metal band, only black earth are really good, but wages of sin(and after it) is very bad album, nemesis , my apocalipsis in my opinion are bullshit, arch enemy lost .... i like obsculum obssenum of hypocrisy, entombed, some works of edge of sanity and at the gates are really good, the first album of dark tranquility is good, well,....one band really good in melodic metal is dissection, "the somberlain" and "storm´s of the light´s bane" are master pieces....
DEAD666able 1 year ago 4
@DEAD666able
So i see you like the old melodic death metal stuff, not the new one!
I like the new one more, but i still prefere the old american death metal (not melodic). But anyway, you cant call A.E an commercial band. In my opinion, even my dying bride, katatonia and therion (that are bands that really dont have a heavy sound), they are not commercial.
Commercial is something like avenged sevenfold, bullet for my valentine, sonic Syndicate, indica, the new within temptation, lacuna coil...
linkinn18 1 year ago
@DEAD666able
And I forgot Carcass!!
linkinn18 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@DEAD666able metal doesnt have to sound like shit and be "underground" to fit the metal genre. people who stay away from trends musically, are themselves, part of a different but very real trend.you should like what you like because it sounds good OR has a good message. if ANYTHING other than the actual music itself (record deals, fame, money) influences whether you like a band or not than you cant call yourself a music fan.
Iwetbeds 1 year ago
@Iwetbeds I'm not sure why your comment has so many negative marks...to be a "non-conformist" and strive to be everything the mainstream isn't is just as stupid as it's antithesis. I appreciate that you recognize that. \m/
ThrashinAllAround092 11 months ago
@DEAD666able i belive black sabbath is the best metal band ever
Metal1998 9 months ago
yo creo la vdd q johal liiva es una cantant exelente porq en canciones como The Immortal en vivo, la vdd si c la afleta porq tal cual es la cancion y alcanza a terminar en tiempo y forma lo unico malo q tiene es q no hace mucho por prender al publico y angela por el contrario en esta cancion si c fijan es mas lenta para q ella alcanze los tiempos, esa cancion la modificaron pero angela si tiende a ser mas explosiva y prender al publico
Mettalera 2 years ago
i preffer johan liiva his voice was amazing.... this wans`t made for angela
Necromorbus1 2 years ago
i dont see whats so amazing about liivas voice. angela carries the band better and has better vocal range.
BlackMetalRevolution 2 years ago 2
Johan did this song better.
midfieldman7 2 years ago
i like johan liiva better
KapaH8sU 2 years ago 2
AGREE, BUT ANGELA SOUND GOOD ALSO.
crazyaddict666 2 years ago 2
totally agree
chan1kenny 2 years ago
@chan1kenny
I still don't know who I prefer. they're both amazing vocalists.
marcus2006 2 years ago
some songs johan performs really better.
angela also.
It depends on what song they perform.
They both are really special !
chan1kenny 2 years ago
I agree. Yhey are both amazing, even though they have different styles.
marcus2006 2 years ago
One of the best Chris Solos ive heard easily!!
sapparth26 2 years ago
wow... this is... i don't have a word good enough to describe this.
Thoricxxx 2 years ago 2
I almost shit myself at 3:35!
Love this song, and she's a great vocalist.
sexy6vamp 2 years ago
Fucking kickass song!
I love it
6ArchEnemy6 3 years ago 2
WOOOOOOW
ShadowArchEnemy 3 years ago 2