This is a main line of the Sicillian. It's known as the lowenthal but they get to this position differently. If you check the databases, that bishop move at the end (2. Bc4) is an extremely weak move that can easily be exploited with e6 followed by a6 and eventually b5. 4... e5 is not a great move because it leaves a hole that can very easily be exploited. Also at 7:18, the e4 pawn is hanging...
I was confused for a while about that a7-a6 pawn move, but then I realized that it was preventing the knight response Kd4-b5 to Fisher's e7-e5 pawn attack which forced Wolfgang to move his knight off to the side effectively "un-developing" it. Fisher was looking pretty far ahead when he went into this opening. Good Move Fisher!!
noo way I refuse to believe you got a 1323 rating... the way you analyze chess games I though you were a grandmaster... anyways love your videos am learning ALOT keep `em coming thx :D
I would develop my b Knight to c6 forcing him to move his queen while I continue to develop material. The danger of bringing your queen out early is that your opponent can find ways to kick it around while developing their pieces.
I love how americans always talk about fischer, isnt that so biased? I mean he was a great player no doubt but the best players in the world and overall today shows that america is not one of the best chess nations, just wondering why are we biased even in chess? is it to show that americans are the cleverist if thats the case than the answer to the world would be prob be no. no hardfeelings to you jrobi but just a general analysis from what I ve seen on many videos here and chess programs.
dont think this system has no venom to it, just because fischer used it. this is the sicilian schvenshnikov, a double edged opening which plays with the dynamics around the bolesavski hole (thats the big hole that is created in d5 after black plays e5, which usually is occupied by a knight). usually black has to resort to a lot of tactical play if he wants to survive the pressure on the d6 pawn.
a nice example of what not to do in this line as black: youtubesearch "Pogonina vs rest of the world"
in the second match after Nd5 the white pawn on e4 is undefended. but anyway thanks for the videos they are quite useful, I have always had problems with opening theories.
this is the sicilian najadorf variation. the white knight moving 3 times is the correct line. Whites errors were: bringing the bishop to c5 and castling king. The book line is: e4 - c4... kf3 - d6..d4 - cxd4... kxd4 - kf6... kc3 - a6... - be3 - e5... kb3 - from here black then has the option of kg4 attacking the bishop or the more common be7.
i never really play the sicilian, and absurdly i just went to fics to mess around in some guest games, played against a white king's pawn opening, and developed the board basically as raw mimicry of fischer's response and ended up winning easily(:. the position was actually very strong and intuitive, even for a novice like myself. thanks.
I just played someone, as black. I was playing the Sicilian, and was seeing which variation I was going to use. But instead of doing the instant trade of the c pawn for White's center pawn, white instead did c3, so to turn his C pawn into a center pawn, which is bad.. so I think I was forced to do e5, is that correct?
Play as Black, I will ignore the pressure made by Bishop to f6 square. 2.Bc4 consider instead of 2.Nf6 will not seems as a shaky move for Black player who are familiar with Kopec variation.
And I would like to bring the game to Scheveningen or Najdorf instead of Dragon
I believe that playing agressively with 2. - e6 and 3. - d5! is the only real way to play for the initiative. It would be a pity not to punish white's poor opening choise. And it's a pretty easy way to play, if you know theory in the Alapin. It also scores an amazing 60 to 22 percent for black.
is it svesnikov or kalashnikov? correct me if i'm wrong. the only real way?? i may say alternative way. May be u like to take over the attacking tempo from White early. It would be risky or U force White to choose a drawish position. Maybe u are master with Kan or Taimanov Line but i still prefer playing 2....e6. Be calm. The endgame will be yours
Why wouldn't Unzicker capture with Nxf6? Isn't it good when the opponent has two bishops to trade one? Or is the Knight's position at d5 better than a trade?
Basically yes. As jrobi mentioned the d5 white knight is very placed (centralized piece and over defended) where as black f6 piece is a "bad" bishop. It's being blocked by his own pawn.
White don't want to make this trade right now since doing so means using his best positioned piece to get Black's worst positioned piece. Plus, this trade would allow Black to develop his queen (after Qxf6) and link his rooks.
Well it's far from being useless actually. This is part of the najdorf sicilian. The ideas are to push b5, Bb7, and then you have the nice c4 square for your knight with Kd7-Kb6-Kc4. But here since whites have castle king side the attack on the queen side with this system is quite useless and that's probably why Fischer changed his plan by not pushing b5 and put his bishop on e6 instead of b7.
Haha, the ending of the match was pretty funny for me. I was wondering if you could post the BEST game you've ever played, win or lose. It would be great for my chess development.
I too would like to thank you for your work in posting all these videos. As MAfr3ak says, however, this is mainline. In return for moving the knight 3 times in the opening, White gets a nice outpost at d5 and Black is saddled with a backward and potentially weak pawn at d6. Personally, I believe that the moves Bg5 followed immediately by BxN are "erroneous" in that there is no reason to give up the bishop pair that easily. If White must move Bg5 why not try to provoke black into h6?
I plan on doing some vids on the mainlines for the Sicilian. Like the Ruy Lopez it's a massive amount of theory and plently of lines to the opening, so it should be a fun project.
well that would be the in the Open Sicillian: najdorf, dragon, classical, sheviningen, sveshnikov, accelerated dragon, taimanov, kan, four knights, then theres the moscow, rossolimo, alapin, closed, grand prix, smith morra, this would be a lot of videos
It's to prevent Bb5+. Black doesn't want to trade any material and simplify the position. Also, in some lines of the Najdorf black will push the B pawn to b5 and fianchetto the bishop. Finally, it gains space on the queenside. This is useful because many times in the sicilian white will castle queenside. Watch some of the classic Fischer or Kasparov Najdorf games and you will learn more about this opening.
This looks like Lownthel-Kalashnikov variation of Sicilian defence. I used to play it and had a tough games. But, what about : 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 e5 5. Nf3 again? In this case how Black can continue? Any suggestions..
to stop a knight from coming in, and to prepare the queenside attack of b5. its also a waiting move, sometimes the queen goes to c7, so a6 stops a knight from attacking the queen
I'm just now seeing your other videos. I am presently going through B. Fischer's openings and these videos are great really !!! Very good approach/very good points. concise and direct - really nice J.Robi, Thanks, Rudy792
The Sicilian defence looks really strong here, I'm going to check it out more in depth. Thnx for posting the vid always awesome! Subscribe button will be clicked.
From what I was able to find, BE2 is often played by white when they are looking for a more quiet positional match as opposed to an aggressive one - that might have been Wolfgang's hope by playing that against Fischer. Thanks for the comment and checking out the video.
I don't think ...Be6 in your game is a mistake because if White takes with the c4 Bishop, Black plays fxe6 and gets a pawn mass in the center, plus an open f-file. But a definite mistake was missing ...Nxe4! after White played Nd5? (7:13). Looks like you passed up a free pawn.
i like the idea of checking out fischer's openings and the way he played the sicilian is interesting. nice presentation too, what kind of software r u using?
Thanks Frank - I appreciate the comment! I use chessbase lite for going over the PGN's but you can also use a variety of other programs such as Fritz or the graphical interfaces from the Free Internet Chess Server.
i liked whites positions , in the fischer game ,at a glance because of the space advantage ,but to me looked about equal so i guess black achieved something
There is nothing wrong with 4.Qxd4. It's a perfectly viable system. And to the poster who said Qxd4 isn't good because of a6 and not Nc6, well Nc6 is just as good as a6. It's just a matter of taste.
I think that you made a mistake at 06:53 when you moved your bishop to e6 because he could have taken your bishop with his bishop at c4 and then you would have to take with your pawn and you would eventually have doble pawns which is a disadvantage for you :S
Doubled e and d pawns are seldom a disadvantage, especially in the opening. That game was well played by you, very odd to see BQB4 played by white so early especially against the Scillian. Its best to goad black into a stonewall position then try to break it apart with the knights
A word of advice: Refer to the players by their color
Introduce the players + color in the beginning and then call them "black" and "white". Also, around 4:00 you clicked on a square a bishop shouldn't go to.
Thanks for checking out the video doob. I state the players and color in the beginning. I will try to point that out more throughout if I remember. I see what you are referring to at 4:00 - the program had that diagonal off a bit but I was referring to the diagonal to the right that the bishop had access to.
My friend has just asked me WHY Black plays d6, and I thought I'd post the reason here for people new to chess like him. It isn't as he thought to defend the c5 pawn, which currently is hard to attack other than d4 which results in a trade not a loss. It is instead intended to prepare for Nf6, where without d6 White could play e5! with a brilliant opening advantage. I know this will be obvious to most of you, but it'll be of use to someone. Nice short video by the way.
Assessing the position objectively its hard to say white has any real advantage, but I don't see what black has in that particular position to counterbalance the weakness on d5. So I would probably say that after move 10 white is slightly better. Of course it is silly to assess such theory-heavy openings after move 10.
Interesting points. The purpose of these videos though is simply to look at Fischer's openings and how he plays against certain openings, and what he used with his openings. I am not planning on getting into the middle-game, but rather what are some good line moves to use in the openings to at least have a solid position going into the middle game, as opposed to coming out behind positionally after the opening moves. Thanks for the comments and feedback, I appreciate them!
The point of 4.Qxd4 is that it doesn't lose tempo because 4...Nc6 can be met by 5.Bb5. After move 10, the position is only scratching the surface of Najdorf theory, which like I said can run until move 20 or more. It's like saying black is equal after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6.
4.Qxd4 is perfectly reasonable, just not as flexible. It's ridiculous to say that Fischer has equalized by move 7 in an opening where theory can run 20 or more moves deep. In exchange for losing tempo white inflicts a permanent weakness at d5, which is one of the most basic ideas in the sicilian. I must say you really have a great voice for lecturing, if only you understood the subject a bit better.
QXD4 would definitely have been an option for Wolfgang, but I think he didn't opt for that due to the further development of black at the cost of some more temp. I think Fischer had equalized, which is the goal of many black defences. At the end of the first 10 moves how would you assess Fischer's position in this match? Thanks for the comment and checking out the video!
This is a main line of the Sicillian. It's known as the lowenthal but they get to this position differently. If you check the databases, that bishop move at the end (2. Bc4) is an extremely weak move that can easily be exploited with e6 followed by a6 and eventually b5. 4... e5 is not a great move because it leaves a hole that can very easily be exploited. Also at 7:18, the e4 pawn is hanging...
hitppohiman 1 month ago
can you tell me which website is that you are playing porfavor?
rhyne222 2 months ago
jrobi may i ask what is ur elo rating? do you have fide title? because ur good
mosesredsea 2 months ago
Awesome..
10bobbyjoe3 2 months ago
It's a drunk bishop. Been on the stella.
LSJShez 4 months ago
I was confused for a while about that a7-a6 pawn move, but then I realized that it was preventing the knight response Kd4-b5 to Fisher's e7-e5 pawn attack which forced Wolfgang to move his knight off to the side effectively "un-developing" it. Fisher was looking pretty far ahead when he went into this opening. Good Move Fisher!!
daleinin 8 months ago
@daleinin he was probably looking like 20moves forward :D
Frreyz 2 months ago
What are you talking it was my dark square bishop that killed your queen.
rhyne222 9 months ago
i don't care about he's rating he is making awesome videos and he enjoys playing chess
zk453 11 months ago
That's why he has a 1323 rating. 2 ...d6 is wrong. e6 is much stronger
TheNonplussed 1 year ago
noo way I refuse to believe you got a 1323 rating... the way you analyze chess games I though you were a grandmaster... anyways love your videos am learning ALOT keep `em coming thx :D
EMINEMisTheBestNr1 1 year ago
it would be nice if you put this series and other series in a playlist...
grinchychristmas 1 year ago
@jabrightlefthook
Fischer bit off someone's ear? =P
ubanare 1 year ago
What do i do if my opponent sends a queen to A4?
Sorry im new and just started playing chess 2 days ago.
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
@KaminariKatta
I would develop my b Knight to c6 forcing him to move his queen while I continue to develop material. The danger of bringing your queen out early is that your opponent can find ways to kick it around while developing their pieces.
daleinin 8 months ago
@daleinin Herr!!!!!
MrJackanthony 2 months ago
Nice video but it'd be nice if you'd shown the whole of the Fischer game moves.
herbal1971 1 year ago
I love how americans always talk about fischer, isnt that so biased? I mean he was a great player no doubt but the best players in the world and overall today shows that america is not one of the best chess nations, just wondering why are we biased even in chess? is it to show that americans are the cleverist if thats the case than the answer to the world would be prob be no. no hardfeelings to you jrobi but just a general analysis from what I ve seen on many videos here and chess programs.
MrNormalG 1 year ago
@MrNormalG It's probably because he had one of the highest ratings but he was also an interesting character but I take your point.
herbal1971 1 year ago
dont think this system has no venom to it, just because fischer used it. this is the sicilian schvenshnikov, a double edged opening which plays with the dynamics around the bolesavski hole (thats the big hole that is created in d5 after black plays e5, which usually is occupied by a knight). usually black has to resort to a lot of tactical play if he wants to survive the pressure on the d6 pawn.
a nice example of what not to do in this line as black: youtubesearch "Pogonina vs rest of the world"
chrism216 1 year ago
HI.
In the last part ,why didnt u take the pown on E4 after ur opponents move knigt on D5?Why is it a bad move in this part of the game?
Tnx for explaining this to me.
mors322 1 year ago
Hi jrobi, on 4:08 you show that the light-squared bishop can access a dark square. There's a small mistake in the arrow drawn there.
FYI, and thanks for the videos.
Udi
udieylat 1 year ago
Excellent video. very instructive especially your game in which you adapted the Najadorf in response to you openents moves,
thanxs
andrew654321bd 1 year ago
why didn't you mention about the backward d6 pawn and the weak d5 square for black? do black have any compensation for both of these weaknesses?
i rarely played ...e5 if I were to use the Sicilian due to both of the above mention weaknesses for black. ;(
gunblade712 1 year ago
I'm really enjoying these Fischer openings, they have helped my understanding of the best defense against the Kings, Thanks
markmansfield1960 1 year ago
RIP Bobby Fischer
Powerofthecowboy 1 year ago
you should play E6 after he develops bishop to C4. You dont really want him attacking black's F7 Pawn.
killabigk 1 year ago
nice
irie2day 1 year ago
nice! what is the name of the program used for the board?
Repelsteeltju 1 year ago
kasparov was better
ultranoob802 1 year ago
@ultranoob802 Lies.
NumbFlynn 1 year ago
Comment removed
waxythread13 1 year ago
7:19 free pawn
ILikeShuffle 1 year ago
@ILikeShuffle: yes
@jrobi: why didnt you take it?
hapiluki 1 year ago
what is a good opening for black if white played a queen side opening
DutchAntiChrist 1 year ago
What's the point of pawn to a6 that early (black)?
shogundapker 1 year ago
Comment removed
Willomz 1 year ago
@shogundapker
mainly to stop the bishop checking the king, but there are other benefits too
Willomz 1 year ago
Great videos, you explain things very well, I'm gonna subscribe right now. Keep 'em coming.
flinagin 1 year ago
in the second match after Nd5 the white pawn on e4 is undefended. but anyway thanks for the videos they are quite useful, I have always had problems with opening theories.
pornyhony 1 year ago
this is the sicilian najadorf variation. the white knight moving 3 times is the correct line. Whites errors were: bringing the bishop to c5 and castling king. The book line is: e4 - c4... kf3 - d6..d4 - cxd4... kxd4 - kf6... kc3 - a6... - be3 - e5... kb3 - from here black then has the option of kg4 attacking the bishop or the more common be7.
stavros8705 1 year ago
GREAT VIEDO
sandrews3627 2 years ago
great stuff, please keep posting!
laurensmn 2 years ago 2
nice video! cheers
dreamtheater39 2 years ago 2
thatsa badass white bishop at 4:08 pointin to a5 lol
turkeyboykillintyme 2 years ago 46
@turkeyboykillintyme how??
angeriod 2 months ago
white's queen should have moved upa square earlier on in order to allow a Q-side castle. he gave Fischer the advantage
woodensaw 2 years ago
i never really play the sicilian, and absurdly i just went to fics to mess around in some guest games, played against a white king's pawn opening, and developed the board basically as raw mimicry of fischer's response and ended up winning easily(:. the position was actually very strong and intuitive, even for a novice like myself. thanks.
jaileroflove 2 years ago
Great vid jrobi! just wondering if you could post a few more white openings.
sergey58us 2 years ago
Thanks for this vid, jrob. Finding a good response to e5 is one of my toughest challenges.
ShotDownInFlames2 2 years ago
Hello and thanks for the vid.
I noticed that in your game, when your opponent played Nd5 you could have won the pawn on e4 with your F knight insted of Nc6.
myristique 2 years ago 2
I just played someone, as black. I was playing the Sicilian, and was seeing which variation I was going to use. But instead of doing the instant trade of the c pawn for White's center pawn, white instead did c3, so to turn his C pawn into a center pawn, which is bad.. so I think I was forced to do e5, is that correct?
TheJoshic32 2 years ago
4:08 nice magic bishop lol
ultrascape 2 years ago 21
haha i didnt even notice that... XD
boodaguy 2 years ago
The power of god gives the bishop that ability. lol
tubajedimaster 2 years ago
@ultrascape LOLOL
achilies12346 1 year ago
I really wish he'd continue with the rest of the match in a follow up video. Great job though.
checkster12 2 years ago
man!! ur gooD!!thnks for this vids
cyrussar 2 years ago
After 1. e4 c5 2. Bc4 the move d6 isn't as good as e6, which blocks the bishops pressure on f6 and allows a nice d5 with tempo.
ooaaveehoo 2 years ago
Play as Black, I will ignore the pressure made by Bishop to f6 square. 2.Bc4 consider instead of 2.Nf6 will not seems as a shaky move for Black player who are familiar with Kopec variation.
And I would like to bring the game to Scheveningen or Najdorf instead of Dragon
balakaras 2 years ago
I believe that playing agressively with 2. - e6 and 3. - d5! is the only real way to play for the initiative. It would be a pity not to punish white's poor opening choise. And it's a pretty easy way to play, if you know theory in the Alapin. It also scores an amazing 60 to 22 percent for black.
ooaaveehoo 2 years ago
is it svesnikov or kalashnikov? correct me if i'm wrong. the only real way?? i may say alternative way. May be u like to take over the attacking tempo from White early. It would be risky or U force White to choose a drawish position. Maybe u are master with Kan or Taimanov Line but i still prefer playing 2....e6. Be calm. The endgame will be yours
balakaras 2 years ago
Why wouldn't Unzicker capture with Nxf6? Isn't it good when the opponent has two bishops to trade one? Or is the Knight's position at d5 better than a trade?
MrAndrews1070 2 years ago
Basically yes. As jrobi mentioned the d5 white knight is very placed (centralized piece and over defended) where as black f6 piece is a "bad" bishop. It's being blocked by his own pawn.
White don't want to make this trade right now since doing so means using his best positioned piece to get Black's worst positioned piece. Plus, this trade would allow Black to develop his queen (after Qxf6) and link his rooks.
downding 2 years ago
Great stuff.
Very informative.
Platano0587 2 years ago 2
what move would fischer make (possible move) if after moving K e4, the Q moves to D4 - ?
colourwins 2 years ago
What do you mean you THINK Fischer was the best chessplayer against the king's pawn opening? You know he IS. :)
chasingjustice 2 years ago
why is it all uppside down on my screen lol
GinoTheSinner 2 years ago
it's an April fools jokes from youtube just detele the &flip from the URl
Andy177man 2 years ago
yah e5 does create problems but kramnik beat kasporov with e5 so it shouldn't be that bad.
dhundupdolker 2 years ago
jrobi, don't be so hasty to push e5 in Sicilian. It severely weakens your d5 square (unless you're a Fischer of course. :D)
raptriforcee 3 years ago
I personally like the Dragon. Sharp play and complex lines.
raptriforcee 3 years ago
i talked to the US champion a week ago at the illinois state tournament. he said naijdorf is better. im also a dragon player btw.
MrXbox36067946794 3 years ago
It's the Nadjorf variation. Prevents Bb5+ and allows for b5 later.
raptriforcee 3 years ago
Can somebody please explain to be the usefulness of Fischer's move on 4. ... a6?
Chozo003 3 years ago
i would guess bishop check (but i dont see anything good about that) or moving the knights in to attack... It's anyone's guess really.
Eagleye893 3 years ago
Well it's far from being useless actually. This is part of the najdorf sicilian. The ideas are to push b5, Bb7, and then you have the nice c4 square for your knight with Kd7-Kb6-Kc4. But here since whites have castle king side the attack on the queen side with this system is quite useless and that's probably why Fischer changed his plan by not pushing b5 and put his bishop on e6 instead of b7.
wl4dymir 3 years ago
its to keep the bishop check from happening and to bush b5, both of which are central to the naijdorf
MrXbox36067946794 3 years ago
to prevent Bb5+ or the annoying Nb5
nayef012 3 years ago
I like white actually.. after and during the opening.
theoriginalanomaly 3 years ago
Oddly, I've never seen this opening sequence before, but I have played it.
I enjoy it, I almost always play the Sicilian as my opening move.
monkaboy 3 years ago
Haha, the ending of the match was pretty funny for me. I was wondering if you could post the BEST game you've ever played, win or lose. It would be great for my chess development.
Jahanam9994 3 years ago
during the second match a pawn on white was hung
should've taken it instead of move knight?
infinitexfantasy 3 years ago
If he would captured ur bishop on 6:56 and recapture with your F pawn u would be in a better position?
lupe12345 3 years ago
well done grt video, thx
heavykevyproductions 3 years ago
At 7:25, you missed a free pawn on e4 :)
wretcherwretch 3 years ago 2
Great Videos! They have helped my openings. Thanks!
dawg141 3 years ago
Yes good old typo there. =)
jrobichess 3 years ago 5
haha yeah i noticed that too ^^
GGL09 3 years ago
I don't mind at all - send me the URL so I can add it to my list. Thanks for checking out the vid!
jrobichess 3 years ago
what do you do if opponent moves his bishop from F1 to b5 putting you in check..you have to sacrafice a pieace and take his bishop then?
cyfi16 3 years ago
4:30ish
that is one crazy bishop tactic
how do you attack a dark square with a light bishop
246trinitrotoluene 3 years ago 10
Fischer could do magic on the board, didn't you know? =)
jrobichess 3 years ago 9
JRobi:
I too would like to thank you for your work in posting all these videos. As MAfr3ak says, however, this is mainline. In return for moving the knight 3 times in the opening, White gets a nice outpost at d5 and Black is saddled with a backward and potentially weak pawn at d6. Personally, I believe that the moves Bg5 followed immediately by BxN are "erroneous" in that there is no reason to give up the bishop pair that easily. If White must move Bg5 why not try to provoke black into h6?
day2knight 3 years ago 2
Thanks Jrobi for posting all those important games and chess openings. I learned a lot from your videos and my game has improved significantly.
Keep up the good work!
tiwarivikram 3 years ago
Thanks tiwarivikram - I appreciate the comment!
jrobichess 3 years ago
jrobi-- this is all mainline, you make it sound like fischer is destroying wolfgang
MAfr3ak 3 years ago 2
I plan on doing some vids on the mainlines for the Sicilian. Like the Ruy Lopez it's a massive amount of theory and plently of lines to the opening, so it should be a fun project.
jrobichess 3 years ago
well that would be the in the Open Sicillian: najdorf, dragon, classical, sheviningen, sveshnikov, accelerated dragon, taimanov, kan, four knights, then theres the moscow, rossolimo, alapin, closed, grand prix, smith morra, this would be a lot of videos
MAfr3ak 3 years ago
It's going to be a big project for sure - thanks for checking out the vid and commenting!
jrobichess 3 years ago
oh and those are those most common variatons, there are even more like kalashnikov, nimzo-rubinstein, katalimov, hyperaccelarated dragon, Ga-Pa, etc
MAfr3ak 3 years ago
And don't forget the Black Star Dragon and SSJ5 dragon. It's piece advantage is over 9000.
Discharg3 3 years ago
lol nice
Grakovskiy 3 years ago
It's to prevent Bb5+. Black doesn't want to trade any material and simplify the position. Also, in some lines of the Najdorf black will push the B pawn to b5 and fianchetto the bishop. Finally, it gains space on the queenside. This is useful because many times in the sicilian white will castle queenside. Watch some of the classic Fischer or Kasparov Najdorf games and you will learn more about this opening.
poprockssuck87 3 years ago
Hey jrobi, great vid :). I was wondering if you have a video concerning the Two Knights Defense.
ganamedious 3 years ago
But you can block with either Knight or bishop, so what is the harm does the check of bishop really gonna do?
DamnControl2 3 years ago
This looks like Lownthel-Kalashnikov variation of Sicilian defence. I used to play it and had a tough games. But, what about : 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 e5 5. Nf3 again? In this case how Black can continue? Any suggestions..
weewee33wee44 3 years ago
no, you should play Nb5 to threaten to go to d6. play could continue in this variation d6 c4 Be7 Nc3, etc
MAfr3ak 3 years ago
I'm just curious at a6, what is the actual purpose of that?
DamnControl2 3 years ago
to stop a knight from coming in, and to prepare the queenside attack of b5. its also a waiting move, sometimes the queen goes to c7, so a6 stops a knight from attacking the queen
MAfr3ak 3 years ago
Nice voice...
svidler1987 4 years ago
Thanks!
jrobichess 4 years ago
I'm just now seeing your other videos. I am presently going through B. Fischer's openings and these videos are great really !!! Very good approach/very good points. concise and direct - really nice J.Robi, Thanks, Rudy792
rudy792 4 years ago
Thanks for the comment and checking out the vid Rudy!
jrobichess 4 years ago
Fischer and unzicker actually drew this game if I am not mistaken.
rudy792 4 years ago
JRobi, you are a good kid
nathandho 4 years ago
Thanks for checking out the vid nathandho!
jrobichess 4 years ago
This is a really good video. I'll continue to pay attention to these.
bodhidarma1 4 years ago
This is a really good video. I'll continue to pay attention to these.
bodhidarma1 4 years ago
Thanks bodhidarma1!
jrobichess 4 years ago
Thanks to JROBI, youtube, and other posters. This is so much more accessible than reading it on paper.
chowbelly 4 years ago
Thanks for the comment chowbelly!
jrobichess 4 years ago
That's awesome Cuban! Keep it up!
jrobichess 4 years ago
The Sicilian defence looks really strong here, I'm going to check it out more in depth. Thnx for posting the vid always awesome! Subscribe button will be clicked.
Peace.Love.Happiness
BigStupidFingers 4 years ago
Thanks Big!
jrobichess 4 years ago
This is a standard opening variation of the Najdorf, but Be2 is a bit more passive than Bg5 or Be3.
nice vieo, but white Bishop pointing to a5?
bolleharry5 4 years ago
From what I was able to find, BE2 is often played by white when they are looking for a more quiet positional match as opposed to an aggressive one - that might have been Wolfgang's hope by playing that against Fischer. Thanks for the comment and checking out the video.
jrobichess 4 years ago
I don't think ...Be6 in your game is a mistake because if White takes with the c4 Bishop, Black plays fxe6 and gets a pawn mass in the center, plus an open f-file. But a definite mistake was missing ...Nxe4! after White played Nd5? (7:13). Looks like you passed up a free pawn.
komyt 4 years ago
Thanks for the comment and checking out the video Komyt - I think you're right about 7:13 - I will check that out in the viewer.
jrobichess 4 years ago
i like the idea of checking out fischer's openings and the way he played the sicilian is interesting. nice presentation too, what kind of software r u using?
frank124c 4 years ago
Thanks Frank - I appreciate the comment! I use chessbase lite for going over the PGN's but you can also use a variety of other programs such as Fritz or the graphical interfaces from the Free Internet Chess Server.
jrobichess 4 years ago
i liked whites positions , in the fischer game ,at a glance because of the space advantage ,but to me looked about equal so i guess black achieved something
sausage4mash 4 years ago
Agreed. Thanks for checking out the video Mash!
jrobichess 4 years ago
What chess software is that?
foraneagle2 4 years ago
There is nothing wrong with 4.Qxd4. It's a perfectly viable system. And to the poster who said Qxd4 isn't good because of a6 and not Nc6, well Nc6 is just as good as a6. It's just a matter of taste.
bobbydigital80 4 years ago
I think that you made a mistake at 06:53 when you moved your bishop to e6 because he could have taken your bishop with his bishop at c4 and then you would have to take with your pawn and you would eventually have doble pawns which is a disadvantage for you :S
ZsSuperCumulo 4 years ago
Definitely could have created some pawn weaknesses Super - thanks for checking out the video!
jrobichess 4 years ago
Doubled e and d pawns are seldom a disadvantage, especially in the opening. That game was well played by you, very odd to see BQB4 played by white so early especially against the Scillian. Its best to goad black into a stonewall position then try to break it apart with the knights
Tiwaking 4 years ago
Awesome comment Tiwaking!
jrobichess 4 years ago
Awesome comment unorthodox! Thanks for checking out the video!
jrobichess 4 years ago
One of diagonal in 4:13 looks very funny :) Anyway very good vid.
tazeq 4 years ago
Yes my mouse went a little "off" there. =)
jrobichess 4 years ago
A word of advice: Refer to the players by their color
Introduce the players + color in the beginning and then call them "black" and "white". Also, around 4:00 you clicked on a square a bishop shouldn't go to.
doob10163 4 years ago
Thanks for checking out the video doob. I state the players and color in the beginning. I will try to point that out more throughout if I remember. I see what you are referring to at 4:00 - the program had that diagonal off a bit but I was referring to the diagonal to the right that the bishop had access to.
jrobichess 4 years ago
My friend has just asked me WHY Black plays d6, and I thought I'd post the reason here for people new to chess like him. It isn't as he thought to defend the c5 pawn, which currently is hard to attack other than d4 which results in a trade not a loss. It is instead intended to prepare for Nf6, where without d6 White could play e5! with a brilliant opening advantage. I know this will be obvious to most of you, but it'll be of use to someone. Nice short video by the way.
pestlett 4 years ago
Thanks Pestlett - and excellent comment!
jrobichess 4 years ago
Thanks for that comment. The person that helps is me. I've been trying to get the Sicilian to work. Thanks again.
ShotDownInFlames2 2 years ago
Assessing the position objectively its hard to say white has any real advantage, but I don't see what black has in that particular position to counterbalance the weakness on d5. So I would probably say that after move 10 white is slightly better. Of course it is silly to assess such theory-heavy openings after move 10.
Gohma 4 years ago
Interesting points. The purpose of these videos though is simply to look at Fischer's openings and how he plays against certain openings, and what he used with his openings. I am not planning on getting into the middle-game, but rather what are some good line moves to use in the openings to at least have a solid position going into the middle game, as opposed to coming out behind positionally after the opening moves. Thanks for the comments and feedback, I appreciate them!
jrobichess 4 years ago
The point of 4.Qxd4 is that it doesn't lose tempo because 4...Nc6 can be met by 5.Bb5. After move 10, the position is only scratching the surface of Najdorf theory, which like I said can run until move 20 or more. It's like saying black is equal after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6.
Gohma 4 years ago
4.Qxd4 is perfectly reasonable, just not as flexible. It's ridiculous to say that Fischer has equalized by move 7 in an opening where theory can run 20 or more moves deep. In exchange for losing tempo white inflicts a permanent weakness at d5, which is one of the most basic ideas in the sicilian. I must say you really have a great voice for lecturing, if only you understood the subject a bit better.
Gohma 4 years ago
QXD4 would definitely have been an option for Wolfgang, but I think he didn't opt for that due to the further development of black at the cost of some more temp. I think Fischer had equalized, which is the goal of many black defences. At the end of the first 10 moves how would you assess Fischer's position in this match? Thanks for the comment and checking out the video!
jrobichess 4 years ago
pretty cool
nanquan491 4 years ago
Another good one.
Test2Bear 4 years ago
Thanks for checking it out Test2Bear!
jrobichess 4 years ago
nice vid
andsanp 4 years ago
Awesome, thanks Andsanp!
jrobichess 4 years ago