ladies and gentlemen classical music as we all know was played a different way in mozarts time for one the technology and the instruments were different the tempi was clearly indicated when he wrote this composition no more and 4 notes per 1 bar is usually the standard speed at that time but to spice it up in todays world pianist do tend to turn it up a notch and this has been done by many a piano player throughout the years the big thing is getting the melodic transfusions correct
ooh he is good. I am studying this piece for AS Level, so this is really useful. I think the tempo is perfect, any faster and he'd lose the emphasis on the lively melody, but i suppose that's up to everyone's own opinion.
There is a theory that in Mozart's time everything was played slower than today, because the whole rhythm of life was far slower. So maybe Mozart would have played it like this, or even slower, who knows? However, art and music must reflect the times, so it also makes sense to play it faster, like Gould for example. But that's neither here or there. Both tempi, and everything in between, are perfectly legitimate. Chacun son gout, as the French say.
Except in Lim's playing the tempo does matter, because his staccato is too short and a lot of his scales and [Alberti] bass is very "fingery." If he sped it up it might come across with an easier touch and the phrasing he is (trying??) to do would come across. You have to understand that music doesn't count on tempo, but if there was such thing as tempo-- why wouldn't it count? It's like everything that makes up music, if the right tempo doesn't fit it won't 'be' music. Same with turns by he way
I think, to be honest, that the tempo is just a little bit too slow. I played this when I applied for the conservatory, and was told to use 128-132. The movement gets another mood then.
i agree, he is too slow. 128-132 is tough though, very hard to achieve with control and without losing the lyrical shape. I would say 125 is about right!
bravo!
5748peter 3 weeks ago
Really enjoyed your unique interpretation of this Mozart Sonata, absolutely beautiful !!!
kevingao2000 3 months ago
Deos no one like that repeat?
Hitherto90 7 months ago
WOW HE'S AWESOME!!! I'M LIKE 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000X WORSE DDDD':
TeamJacob1903 1 year ago
I call this pressing keys with caution.
ttwiligh7 1 year ago
選用這種速度或許可以浪漫(sentimental),
但我所熱愛莫札特性情中的幽默卻難以聽見。
seremerow 1 year ago
Hope I can play this kind of quality one day... XD
matthewhung212 1 year ago
I am able to play this again!
rweeks1955 1 year ago
he was made to play chopin haha
check out his chopin piano competition recordings in 2000 :)
baboxdoi 1 year ago
ladies and gentlemen classical music as we all know was played a different way in mozarts time for one the technology and the instruments were different the tempi was clearly indicated when he wrote this composition no more and 4 notes per 1 bar is usually the standard speed at that time but to spice it up in todays world pianist do tend to turn it up a notch and this has been done by many a piano player throughout the years the big thing is getting the melodic transfusions correct
johnd2009 1 year ago
I had overlooked this sonata before when I first heard it; maybe its this recording, as I can see now how wonderfully melodic it is.
jacksongrant15 1 year ago
I like it very much. :D
Hope I'll play this one day...
itisjinzo 1 year ago
Comment removed
Chilouune 2 years ago
I'm playing this sonata right now, he plays it really well. The tempo is great, every note is heard like it's suppose to be.
agak94 2 years ago
not bad for Mozart
BTWhq 2 years ago
is he or his brother better?
sumimimi0 2 years ago
even though the way he plays it can be criticized.. you can't deny the fact that it's still at least pleasing to listen to
bones1343 2 years ago
ooh he is good. I am studying this piece for AS Level, so this is really useful. I think the tempo is perfect, any faster and he'd lose the emphasis on the lively melody, but i suppose that's up to everyone's own opinion.
violetskyB 2 years ago
me too which college are you in
amurogundam 2 years ago
woo me too lol
ktmad 2 years ago
i'm doing AS musix too, and yup, this is very helpful, especially at this tempo, so my opinion is it's great :)
nearestfarwayplace 1 year ago
There is a theory that in Mozart's time everything was played slower than today, because the whole rhythm of life was far slower. So maybe Mozart would have played it like this, or even slower, who knows? However, art and music must reflect the times, so it also makes sense to play it faster, like Gould for example. But that's neither here or there. Both tempi, and everything in between, are perfectly legitimate. Chacun son gout, as the French say.
dinastein44 2 years ago 6
I personally think you have a point there.
But I think the way music is understood, the perspective, and the interpretation is changed through time. For example baroque music.
This person kept the core of Mozart in this performance, but surprisingly did not adapt the changes through time.
Desmonddd2002 2 years ago
I like it. compare it to horowitz, lang lang, and eschenbach recordings here .
lunarsensitive 2 years ago
Comment removed
timpanitimptim 2 years ago
From my taste, and listened to numerous version of this piece, Lim's performance is really outstanding, delightful with high artistic value.
dlwangxiaohu 2 years ago
... It's as if Mozart himself were playing ....
arpadelluna 3 years ago
Your sound is off from the video.
thesix107 3 years ago
Mozart's music is not about the speed, but about the absolute accuracy (clarity) and careful phrasing that make music sing.
Sammysteinway 3 years ago 20
Except in Lim's playing the tempo does matter, because his staccato is too short and a lot of his scales and [Alberti] bass is very "fingery." If he sped it up it might come across with an easier touch and the phrasing he is (trying??) to do would come across. You have to understand that music doesn't count on tempo, but if there was such thing as tempo-- why wouldn't it count? It's like everything that makes up music, if the right tempo doesn't fit it won't 'be' music. Same with turns by he way
skg1991 3 years ago 2
@Sammysteinway finally somebody who thinks like me =)
I agree with you!!
Chopin1986 1 year ago
shat lav e
plastypoppers 3 years ago
I think, to be honest, that the tempo is just a little bit too slow. I played this when I applied for the conservatory, and was told to use 128-132. The movement gets another mood then.
Except from that - this is very nice!
MianoPan 3 years ago 2
i agree, he is too slow. 128-132 is tough though, very hard to achieve with control and without losing the lyrical shape. I would say 125 is about right!
englishplayer40 3 years ago
Fantastic!
evelyn5998 3 years ago 4