Pure scaremongering propaganda. Carbon monoxide is lethal not Carbon dioxide. The Sun caused past global warming. The Planet is now cooling due to the onset of the Grand Solar Minimum.
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content
Mikeishere1st, I suggest starting your actual research into factual ice science by visiting the National Snow and Ice Data Center website. where it says, "Examination of the long-term satellite record dating back to 1979 and earlier records dating back to the 1950s indicate that spring melt seasons have started earlier and continued for a longer period throughout the year." Sea ice melting won't cause the sea to rise, but it will compound the problem. Ice reflects heat, water doesn't do as well
Try looking at REAL DATA. Google: JAXA SEA ICE then click on a link to page seaice_extent(dot)htm that shows Arctic sea ice INCREASING for the last two years. Phil Jones (CRU) admitted that there has been no statistically significant global warming since 1995. Jason/Topex sea height buoy network shows NO increase in rate of sea level rise, (been rising for over 8000 years).
You still have zero physical evidence to support the theory that human CO2 causes catastrophic global warming.
BTW - the ANGLE sunlight contacts surface of the earth at the poles precludes much difference between the reflectivity of open water & ice. Look toward the sun over water an hour before sunset - hello GLARE!
Plus, whether it bounces back toward the sun from ice or glances off the surface of open water doesn't make much difference because, at those shallow angles, the sunlight already traveled through a whole heck of a lot more atmosphere than @ equator so most IR was already absorbed.
High CO2 levels are fine for SOME plant species, but the global warming that comes with it also brings exploding insect populations and weather patterns such as drought and torrential rains that are bad for agriculture.
Plus, the coral in the world's oceans is rapidly dying from the warmer temperatures and acidity caused by CO2 dissolved in the water. No coral, no fish.
'Acidity"? The ocean is & will remain alkaline no matter how much CO2 is dissolved into it. You don't seem to know what you're talking about. As for CO2 - you are wrong.. MOST ALL plants do better with more CO2 than there is now. Most plant species evolved bathed in WAY more CO2. When plants first appeared on earth CO2 was well over 10 times what it is now, (and I bet there was coral in the sea too!) Ask a commercial greenhouse operator how much they pump up CO2 to increase profit.
A better way to put it would have been CO2 is a by- product of life. You can't live w/o producing it. But to compare CEI's point to CO2 causing suffocation is preposterous.
Just look at the DATA morons! Satellite lower trop temp shows COOLING since 2002. CO2 is happily still going up while temps are going DOWN = ZERO CORRELATION. James Hansen predicted temp would continue UP... HE WAS WRONG!!! He is a FRAUD HACK! Steve McIntyre totally exposed Hansen's LIES. Ice is now returning EARLIER to the arctic, glaciers are growing again after hundreds of years of shrinking, RECORD low temperatures being set all over the world - HELLO! IT'S GLOBAL COOLING IDIOTS!
Mike, you and your friends at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Rush Limbaugh, Greg Garrison (the deficient Limbaugh clone at WIBC), are all liars. LIAR! TOO MUCH CO2 is a BAD THING.
Mikeishere1st, wow, global cooling? To come out and say the exact opposite of what real climate scientists have proven to be factual in ineffably erroneous, to put it politely. GLOBALLY, the temperatures are changing CLIMATES, which is not WEATHER. Arctic ice is melting whether your Faux News sources want you to realize it or not. NASA images show that since 1979 Arctic perennial sea ice cover has been declining at 9.6 percent per decade. You may choose to ignore science, but not based on facts.
Yeah you're indeed right, Co2 isn't to be suppressed totally, but increasing Co2 and reducing trees is not good - I guess I didn't teach you anything but I thought I'd add the detail in.
No anoniab, plants converting CO2 to O2 is called photosynthesis, not symbiosis. Symbiosis is the exchange of oil company money for bad science to third-rate scientists to disprove actual long-term scientific studies on GLOBAL climate change.
Go to the Science Daily website and search "High Carbon Dioxide Levels Can Retard Plant Growth" I prefer to rely on solid science instead of the media or oil lobbyists.
You have misunder stood what I said. I did not say that plants converting CO2 was symbiosis; I said WE have a symbiotic relationship with plants. They need what we produce and we need what they produce, and that is indeed a symbiotic relationship.
anoniab, sorry I misunderstood you. Still, humans produce 35 Billion Tons of extra CO2/year. Plants can only absorb so much of this. Human activity adds 35/5.26 = 6.65 ppm to the yearly global CO2 budget. Global CO2 is now rising at 2.6 ppm per year. The Earth isn't a perfect sponge, but still re-adsorbs 60% of our emissions or 4 ppm per year! Careful inventory says the Earth absorbs only 50%.
Now, add methane being released in large amounts from thawing tundra and things get interesting.
spetznazkye, I'll listen to your point but why would it be propaganda?
Check out the "NASA ice sea video" on climate change (takes only 30 seconds), tell me if you think the images are fake and only a "political propaganda"
wtf!? either say you agree or don't agree with global warming instead of wasting my time watching your stupid ass 7 min. film with no conclusion of your opinion!!! kin yank
Of course! Thats it! we've all been idiots. people dont die because of lack of oxygen, its co2! and its poisonous!? could almost be as dangerous as carbon monoxide. AND! it'd get an anti social behaivour order in England for kicking that chap in the nuts. What the fuck is this lol
You call CO2 death huh? Well what do you call no CO2? Imagine what would become of every living thing without it. Or put a plastic bag over a tree, I think if the tree could talk it would call Oxygen death. The only thing that is death is lack of needed compounds or too much of unneeded. But the good thing about nature is that is regulates itself, it knows what to do with the extra Carbon.
Global Warming is a scam and only numb headed Marxists dopers believe that co2 is a pollutant. If they believe that then they should kill themselves now. Every time they breath out they pollute.
Sugar + energy - heard a connection there? We eat sugar as an energy source. But when we've had enough, it turns to fat and is not used for energy unless you stop eating sugar.
Same thing for plants - of course they need CO2, but after a certain level however much CO2 you pump at them, the biomass won't change. There's other limiting factors at play.
Blamong CO2 is just a way of increasing tax revenues in order to fund the politicians disgusting lifestyles and that of their pet "scientists". Here in the UK we have a plan for road pricing and a tax for motorists carbon footprint. Money tax money. There are 30 million motorists in the UK. Someone get them together and lets stick our carbon footprints up the governments collective arse. The bikers are already starting their plan.
No one's trying to change your lifestyle. Whether you were born that way, or simply decided an alternative lifestyle was appropriate for you... it is nobody's business but your own. But be sure to use protection.
The silent killer is "carbon MONoxide" but i'm one of those nerds that posts on websites correcting people for making little mistakes, so pitty me for caring, not you for making a simple mistake.
Some greenhouse gases take even longer to leave the atmosphere than co2, but don't trap as much heat. Efforts to cut co2 will cut those gases as a side effect of greater efficiency.
Do you ever see the major green house gas water vapor listed on the bar charts the answer is no because if they listed it at 95% it sure would shot down the importance of co2 at .028% as for your video of people with bags over there heads that has nothing to do with the level of co2 it could go 100 times higher and we still would live
The point I was making with this video was that American Competitive Institute makes stupid commercials with your petroleum dollars, not that co2 is a killer gas. "An Inconvenient Truth" is very well made if you want an intelligent video on global warming.
It does not matter if water vapor cycles out of the air as it is always there and always at the 95% level the majority comes from the oceans and man has no control over it. Whereas the co2 man puts into the air it is .028% that's less than 1% of all green house gases.
Water vapor cycles constantly so if humans force some water vapor into the atmosphere it'll get rained down quickly. Water vapor increases cloud cover which increases the atmosphere's reflectivity, so even while in the atmosphere its greenhouse effect is lessened.
I loved it!! Yes we need carbon dioxide!!, and yes it will kill!! By thinking about Global warming, we think there is a way to not be dependent on oil from over seas and to help our ozone at the same time!!!
This short is genius. You can accomplish so much more through comedy than straight facts. I'm a filmmaker myself and I love stuff like this, it's witty and it carries a great punch. That ad on how great carbon dioxide is, is sooo scary. We really need to get on this problem.
Bringing science and facts to the global warming debate is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. Great video. Well done. Stupid will not be won over by stupid though. Stupid will stop CO2 when it gets more money than it can get from Exxon! Aliens will look at this video when we are all dead before the end of the century and they will be very confused.
this is a great video, although I was confused the first time I watched. I couldn't tell if you were being sarcastic. You've got some great ideas, try some more cuts at it. I love starting a hummer, is like drowning a bag of kittens.
Pure scaremongering propaganda. Carbon monoxide is lethal not Carbon dioxide. The Sun caused past global warming. The Planet is now cooling due to the onset of the Grand Solar Minimum.
david222444 6 months ago
Comment removed
david222444 6 months ago
goku
Mesarphelous 1 year ago
hahahahhahahahhah this is so funny
theno1katzman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DHMO is the guilty chemical!
Dr Miskolczi showed that the solution to a differential equation for the greenhouse effect developed in 1922 by Arthur Milne, wrongly assumed an infinitely thick atmosphere. In re-solving this equation a new term and also a new law of physics have been proposed setting an upper limit to the greenhouse effect. Dr Miskolczis theory indicates that any warming from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide will eventually be offset by a change in atmospheric moisture content
judomagyar 1 year ago
Mikeishere1st, I suggest starting your actual research into factual ice science by visiting the National Snow and Ice Data Center website. where it says, "Examination of the long-term satellite record dating back to 1979 and earlier records dating back to the 1950s indicate that spring melt seasons have started earlier and continued for a longer period throughout the year." Sea ice melting won't cause the sea to rise, but it will compound the problem. Ice reflects heat, water doesn't do as well
Raksaht 1 year ago
Try looking at REAL DATA. Google: JAXA SEA ICE then click on a link to page seaice_extent(dot)htm that shows Arctic sea ice INCREASING for the last two years. Phil Jones (CRU) admitted that there has been no statistically significant global warming since 1995. Jason/Topex sea height buoy network shows NO increase in rate of sea level rise, (been rising for over 8000 years).
You still have zero physical evidence to support the theory that human CO2 causes catastrophic global warming.
Mikeishere1st 1 year ago
BTW - the ANGLE sunlight contacts surface of the earth at the poles precludes much difference between the reflectivity of open water & ice. Look toward the sun over water an hour before sunset - hello GLARE!
Plus, whether it bounces back toward the sun from ice or glances off the surface of open water doesn't make much difference because, at those shallow angles, the sunlight already traveled through a whole heck of a lot more atmosphere than @ equator so most IR was already absorbed.
Mikeishere1st 1 year ago
High CO2 levels are fine for SOME plant species, but the global warming that comes with it also brings exploding insect populations and weather patterns such as drought and torrential rains that are bad for agriculture.
Plus, the coral in the world's oceans is rapidly dying from the warmer temperatures and acidity caused by CO2 dissolved in the water. No coral, no fish.
Numdenu 2 years ago
'Acidity"? The ocean is & will remain alkaline no matter how much CO2 is dissolved into it. You don't seem to know what you're talking about. As for CO2 - you are wrong.. MOST ALL plants do better with more CO2 than there is now. Most plant species evolved bathed in WAY more CO2. When plants first appeared on earth CO2 was well over 10 times what it is now, (and I bet there was coral in the sea too!) Ask a commercial greenhouse operator how much they pump up CO2 to increase profit.
Mikeishere1st 1 year ago
A better way to put it would have been CO2 is a by- product of life. You can't live w/o producing it. But to compare CEI's point to CO2 causing suffocation is preposterous.
anoniab 2 years ago
Love this video. Put in on Twitter...
ourtwicebabies 2 years ago
Man this is stupid -
Can't we just get rid of people?
No - because of cars...
If people were gone, why would cars be necessary?
g4m3th30ty 2 years ago
Just look at the DATA morons! Satellite lower trop temp shows COOLING since 2002. CO2 is happily still going up while temps are going DOWN = ZERO CORRELATION. James Hansen predicted temp would continue UP... HE WAS WRONG!!! He is a FRAUD HACK! Steve McIntyre totally exposed Hansen's LIES. Ice is now returning EARLIER to the arctic, glaciers are growing again after hundreds of years of shrinking, RECORD low temperatures being set all over the world - HELLO! IT'S GLOBAL COOLING IDIOTS!
Mikeishere1st 3 years ago
Mike, you and your friends at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Rush Limbaugh, Greg Garrison (the deficient Limbaugh clone at WIBC), are all liars. LIAR! TOO MUCH CO2 is a BAD THING.
fastfashn 2 years ago
Mikeishere1st, wow, global cooling? To come out and say the exact opposite of what real climate scientists have proven to be factual in ineffably erroneous, to put it politely. GLOBALLY, the temperatures are changing CLIMATES, which is not WEATHER. Arctic ice is melting whether your Faux News sources want you to realize it or not. NASA images show that since 1979 Arctic perennial sea ice cover has been declining at 9.6 percent per decade. You may choose to ignore science, but not based on facts.
Raksaht 1 year ago
Carbon dioxide is a by-product of life. Plants need it in order to produce the oxygen we need to live. It's called "symbiosis".
anoniab 3 years ago
Yeah you're indeed right, Co2 isn't to be suppressed totally, but increasing Co2 and reducing trees is not good - I guess I didn't teach you anything but I thought I'd add the detail in.
leroideschoux 3 years ago
There isn't any reduction, global or otherwise of trees
g4m3th30ty 2 years ago
No anoniab, plants converting CO2 to O2 is called photosynthesis, not symbiosis. Symbiosis is the exchange of oil company money for bad science to third-rate scientists to disprove actual long-term scientific studies on GLOBAL climate change.
Go to the Science Daily website and search "High Carbon Dioxide Levels Can Retard Plant Growth" I prefer to rely on solid science instead of the media or oil lobbyists.
Raksaht 1 year ago
You have misunder stood what I said. I did not say that plants converting CO2 was symbiosis; I said WE have a symbiotic relationship with plants. They need what we produce and we need what they produce, and that is indeed a symbiotic relationship.
anoniab 1 year ago
anoniab, sorry I misunderstood you. Still, humans produce 35 Billion Tons of extra CO2/year. Plants can only absorb so much of this. Human activity adds 35/5.26 = 6.65 ppm to the yearly global CO2 budget. Global CO2 is now rising at 2.6 ppm per year. The Earth isn't a perfect sponge, but still re-adsorbs 60% of our emissions or 4 ppm per year! Careful inventory says the Earth absorbs only 50%.
Now, add methane being released in large amounts from thawing tundra and things get interesting.
Raksaht 1 year ago
Deneing it is = stupid, buy and consume less crap is what it`s about
fyrnifede 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
climate change = political propaganda
spetznazkye 3 years ago
spetznazkye, I'll listen to your point but why would it be propaganda?
Check out the "NASA ice sea video" on climate change (takes only 30 seconds), tell me if you think the images are fake and only a "political propaganda"
leroideschoux 3 years ago
wtf!? either say you agree or don't agree with global warming instead of wasting my time watching your stupid ass 7 min. film with no conclusion of your opinion!!! kin yank
bopollo1983 3 years ago
Of course! Thats it! we've all been idiots. people dont die because of lack of oxygen, its co2! and its poisonous!? could almost be as dangerous as carbon monoxide. AND! it'd get an anti social behaivour order in England for kicking that chap in the nuts. What the fuck is this lol
deceiver02 3 years ago
You call CO2 death huh? Well what do you call no CO2? Imagine what would become of every living thing without it. Or put a plastic bag over a tree, I think if the tree could talk it would call Oxygen death. The only thing that is death is lack of needed compounds or too much of unneeded. But the good thing about nature is that is regulates itself, it knows what to do with the extra Carbon.
xXAkridXx 3 years ago
I wish the world would end, because i,m getting so f**k off with this co2, eco s**t.
I LOVE MY V8 GAS GUZZLER,f**K YOU ECO IDOITS!
gunitfor 3 years ago
Global Warming is a scam and only numb headed Marxists dopers believe that co2 is a pollutant. If they believe that then they should kill themselves now. Every time they breath out they pollute.
bpentium 3 years ago
And your opinion of the American Enterprise Institute commercial is?
gordonmcdowell 3 years ago
co2, photosynthesis--anyone ever heard of a connection there??
MagentaTrue 3 years ago
Sugar + energy - heard a connection there? We eat sugar as an energy source. But when we've had enough, it turns to fat and is not used for energy unless you stop eating sugar.
Same thing for plants - of course they need CO2, but after a certain level however much CO2 you pump at them, the biomass won't change. There's other limiting factors at play.
In simple words:
CO2 = plant growth x 1
CO2 x 2 = plant growth x 1
KamiKaziChicken 3 years ago
dude Co2 is awsome with out it we can't play panitball
aznkid221 4 years ago
this video sux ass!
skrilla101 4 years ago
i must be some kind of eco terrorist because i have a fountain drink machine that runs a big co2 tank. lol what a joke.
mandymac33 4 years ago
Global Warming is a scam.
JolliZon3 4 years ago
Hilarious!
"The only way to fight stupid is with stupid. I'll take over here."
ctm154 4 years ago 2
i dont get it
is this supposed to be funny?
krispykorn 4 years ago
every can of cola opened releases CO2 but not a word to be Said
col1n1234 4 years ago
Blamong CO2 is just a way of increasing tax revenues in order to fund the politicians disgusting lifestyles and that of their pet "scientists". Here in the UK we have a plan for road pricing and a tax for motorists carbon footprint. Money tax money. There are 30 million motorists in the UK. Someone get them together and lets stick our carbon footprints up the governments collective arse. The bikers are already starting their plan.
zarkscott 4 years ago
Great video!
planet2012 4 years ago
Cars Produce Carbon MONO < 1 OXIDE < Oxygen, Soda Produces DI<2 Oxide < Oxygen We Produce DI<2 Oxide < Oxygen
SkeetSkeet6969129 4 years ago
An educational video made by a moron for dumbasses...oh, please....guess what....I WILL NOT change my lifestyle... try and stop me... ;)
Det183 5 years ago 2
No one's trying to change your lifestyle. Whether you were born that way, or simply decided an alternative lifestyle was appropriate for you... it is nobody's business but your own. But be sure to use protection.
gordonmcdowell 4 years ago
@gordonmcdowell there is no wether your bornthat way or not gay people ARE born that way, its genetic
mewmaster151 1 year ago
@Det183 we are not, you can live the way you live with changing your energy source, here is a small list
solar, wind, hydro, nuclear.
thats just some
dragonnutds 1 year ago
The silent killer is "carbon MONoxide" but i'm one of those nerds that posts on websites correcting people for making little mistakes, so pitty me for caring, not you for making a simple mistake.
Slorrin 5 years ago
GOOD POINT !!!
NICBOMB66 5 years ago
Some greenhouse gases take even longer to leave the atmosphere than co2, but don't trap as much heat. Efforts to cut co2 will cut those gases as a side effect of greater efficiency.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
A co2 molecule stays in the atmosphere 5-200 years (depending on saturation in atmosphere). Average water vapor molecule will circulate in 10 days.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
Water vapor isn't going to put more co2 up in the atmosphere, but co2 warming will result in more water vapor in the atmosphere.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
Do you ever see the major green house gas water vapor listed on the bar charts the answer is no because if they listed it at 95% it sure would shot down the importance of co2 at .028% as for your video of people with bags over there heads that has nothing to do with the level of co2 it could go 100 times higher and we still would live
RocketManF4 5 years ago
The point I was making with this video was that American Competitive Institute makes stupid commercials with your petroleum dollars, not that co2 is a killer gas. "An Inconvenient Truth" is very well made if you want an intelligent video on global warming.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
It does not matter if water vapor cycles out of the air as it is always there and always at the 95% level the majority comes from the oceans and man has no control over it. Whereas the co2 man puts into the air it is .028% that's less than 1% of all green house gases.
RocketManF4 5 years ago
why are you not going after water vapor as it makes up 95% of global warming gas
RocketManF4 5 years ago
Water vapor cycles constantly so if humans force some water vapor into the atmosphere it'll get rained down quickly. Water vapor increases cloud cover which increases the atmosphere's reflectivity, so even while in the atmosphere its greenhouse effect is lessened.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
Hillarious!
sondano 5 years ago
Who is going to push Bush, and tell him that we do not want to breath in more CO2
Phil1960 5 years ago
get over it about global warming. its just a ploy for the left to try and get rid of big business because they are anti-capitalists.
Ill be sure and rev my big block V8 a few extra times tomorrow just because of this stupid video.
Camaroguy579 5 years ago
Asshole.
sondano 5 years ago
I loved it!! Yes we need carbon dioxide!!, and yes it will kill!! By thinking about Global warming, we think there is a way to not be dependent on oil from over seas and to help our ozone at the same time!!!
Hillox6699 5 years ago
Think about it, if they pass a carbon tax, the logic conclusion is to tax breathing.
bumpy111 5 years ago
lol loved it
Obsidean 5 years ago
Perhaps I'd better not say...I'm not for this movement at all :-) (here comes the angry mobs lol...)
eventhoriz0n 5 years ago
I will only watch this as a joke. There's really no science in this. Just emotions.
eventhoriz0n 5 years ago
I'd recommend Al Gore's flick if you want science. Someone could watch it then debate, but at least its a starting point for serious discussion.
gordonmcdowell 5 years ago
This short is genius. You can accomplish so much more through comedy than straight facts. I'm a filmmaker myself and I love stuff like this, it's witty and it carries a great punch. That ad on how great carbon dioxide is, is sooo scary. We really need to get on this problem.
lancelotcq2 5 years ago
Bringing science and facts to the global warming debate is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. Great video. Well done. Stupid will not be won over by stupid though. Stupid will stop CO2 when it gets more money than it can get from Exxon! Aliens will look at this video when we are all dead before the end of the century and they will be very confused.
ubermarklar 5 years ago
this is a great video, although I was confused the first time I watched. I couldn't tell if you were being sarcastic. You've got some great ideas, try some more cuts at it. I love starting a hummer, is like drowning a bag of kittens.
davidnode 5 years ago