im sorry but i think i just dont like the "overprocessed" look of this photos.. some other HDR's are nice.. or im not just used to this or its a personal preference..
I've have Photomatix, use the "grunge" preset but cannot get the clouds to come out like you have. I have set my ISO to 100, used a tripod, have a Canon 5d M2, great lenses etc. and still having problems with the dam clouds not coming out at dramatic like you have here and on the Photomatix website. Are you using filters when you take your shots? May I ask you just how you manage to get them to stand out so well?
hi i have photomatix pro 3 and i now put it pictures together but i really don now how to make pictures like that...... please somebody can help my? my mail is simon.vaczy@hotmail.com
Beautiful photographs! I love how you manage to bring in the minute details of the clouds... i'm still learning my way around that...do you use photoshop or matix for that?
So sorry for the late reply, Im sure you got an answer by now but no, I do not use a single "Raw" image. As a matter of fact I use up to 21 raw images to get the best dynamic range.
@MaartePinoy... 21raw images!!?? that is overkill. 3 images of -2, 0, +2 should give you plenty (*but that just personal opinion as with more images you get, the more needs cleaning up (moving foliage, clouds, water, boats etc.) actually im surprised that yours quiet sharp on foliage, no ghosting...
Some images are amazing (and some are overkill on glowing edges and too contrasty for my liking)!! My favorite is 2:31!
Can I ask what lens do u use for shooting your cars @6:31? Thanks very much!
I appreciate all comments "Good & Bad". Even from folks that have no respect for others and no basis for judgment. I will not give You the satisfaction by replying in retaliation.
I guess the world needs folks like Yourself to balance out "Good & Bad" . Unfortunately since You reside on the Bad side, I pity Your 9year Son for having You as a Father to show him the way.
You-Tube is not flikr and so burnt out on slideshows to music. Though this one one has a standard exposure then HDR after which makes it a bit more interesting. A lot of them look a bit too cartoony for me though.
I mean here in Russia. Most museums and historical sites - either don't allow to arrange photographing or charge enormously. And I think you're much ahead in terms of special and maybe weird museums - we don't have many of them now.
its the usual love it ,or hate it thing. I know some of it i 've seen has been brill....so much so its even encouraged me to have a shot at the photmatic trial.....RESULTS..Totally rubbish..well, not strictly true, a couple of shots came out kinda cool BUT purely by luck rather than judgment. toooo many sliders to deal with.
Your stuff however is great ,altho' highly refective subjects seem a bit hit or miss(thinking of bike exhausts here, but wood grain really pops off the screen -)
My view on HDR photography is that it looks best half real/half painting. All if not most of these look like paintings for the most part. If you're using photomatix or some kind of program and barely editing them, i suggest doing the whole HDR proccess manually on photoshop or whatever program you use, they turn out so much more beautiful.
I agree with you totally Xent! But limiting yourself just to one way of doing HDR defeats the purpose of exploring new ways of photography no matter how much editing or little is involved. As far as doing the whole HDR process simply with PS I have done that also but found that I save more time with Matix then PS after.
Well to each their own I guess and everybody has their own technique of editing.
I Thank You for your input as others that might be reading this may learn to love HDR.
So sorry, not familiar with 7.0. Not even sure if Elements does it either. But when You are ready with other software let me know and I'll do what I can to help You out.
I forgot to mention to download the trial version of "Photomatix Pro" which will let You play around with HDR. Worth the download at least to get an idea of HDR.
3 is the minimum recommended but, the more the merrier. It's just more work. I've done some with only 2 and the results were mixed. Some good some not so good. In photography is always good to experiment and find "your groove".
If You are familiar with "Photoshop" and "Photography" for that matter then You should know that HDR IS accomplished within Photoshop. As far as the "Unsharp Mask" You are speaking of it is mainly due to moving objects such as clouds captured in long exposures and had to be done with MULTIPLE shots to have that effect.
I appreciate the comment and constructive criticism and would love to see Your images of HDR so I may have a better understanding of the HDR process?
HDR can be accomplished by Photomatix and other programs. I also have Photomatix and other programs. The only problem I have with them is they work at a minimum of 16bit tiff as your after generated file all the way to Your final edited image.
With Photoshop, automating an HDR all the way to the final image can be accomplished in 32bit format with much detailed and enhanced results. I still use Photomatix because it is quicker tone mapping with the program compared to PS.
Maam, Still awaiting Your HDR You were suppose to send Me. Please inform me when You post it here on You Tube so I can learn from a true master like Yourself.
You are correct on the over saturation part on some of the images, I just left them as part of my slideshow to show the transition from the "Early days" of HDR to my new technique.
I've a question what your camera?
I feel your pics smooth and with amazing colour
thumb up :-)
JalalHani 3 months ago
is it easy to do HDR with raw? i find in CS5 using JPEGs is easy. do you have to compress or do anything special with raw images in HDR
timetoparty11 6 months ago
Sorry but these are quite disgusting. I prefer the original images more.
J2WLai 6 months ago
you need to get rid of those Halos
migranteband 7 months ago 2
Awesome
dbphotoart 11 months ago
WAAAAAAY overdone.
Also, don't tell us to view in HD if you don't upload it in HD.
leviphillip 1 year ago 4
worst HDR-pics i've ever seen.
Too much Halos and too surrealistic.
Bad Music.
*thumbs down*
mrlkv 1 year ago
im sorry but i think i just dont like the "overprocessed" look of this photos.. some other HDR's are nice.. or im not just used to this or its a personal preference..
imhotep08 1 year ago
Impressive pictures but the music...some kind of kiddie-mobilephone-ringtone? Sorry but it is really annoying.
massimodacock 1 year ago
Ever thought about masking in an exposure that contains a good sky? Lots of noise and dirty clouds there.
phdraw 1 year ago
Great HDR photos! I'l like to know how to make a brown color effect (e.g. grasses). Thanks!
sandugo2000 1 year ago
Some of these photos are too extreme for HDR. Color and contrast are way off. :(
IyashiHealing 1 year ago
Okay,
I've have Photomatix, use the "grunge" preset but cannot get the clouds to come out like you have. I have set my ISO to 100, used a tripod, have a Canon 5d M2, great lenses etc. and still having problems with the dam clouds not coming out at dramatic like you have here and on the Photomatix website. Are you using filters when you take your shots? May I ask you just how you manage to get them to stand out so well?
Thanks in advance,
The Meltdownman
meltdownman1 1 year ago
@meltdownman1 just make a dark pic so you can see the clouds well
xxxSNAPExxx 1 year ago
@meltdownman1
you don't want your clouds to look like this. trust me. WAY too dark and overprocessed.
leviphillip 1 year ago 2
may nasubukan ako na photoshop plug in, topaz adjust.. ganda din.. anyway, nice shots/treatment po...
masterbeth2002 1 year ago
Photography and shitty music don't match!
grabedigger 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi i have photomatix pro 3 and i now put it pictures together but i really don now how to make pictures like that...... please somebody can help my? my mail is simon.vaczy@hotmail.com
simonkovaczy 1 year ago
But if I use only CS4 or CS3 , it still gives perfect HDR?
soccerGood 1 year ago
awsome pictures, i love them :) sweet tune in the bigening of the clip, wat is it called? i must have it :D it sounds awsome THNX
odesset 1 year ago
Beautiful photographs! I love how you manage to bring in the minute details of the clouds... i'm still learning my way around that...do you use photoshop or matix for that?
SheekTruth 1 year ago
Real nice!
Brothgar 1 year ago
do you use a single RAW image?? if you use anything else can you please say what, im struggling to find what works best ;) thanks and great vid ;)
An0nym0uscot 2 years ago
@An0nym0uscot RAW is best for any type of photoshop work because every time you save it you lose pixels.
lilthug19908 2 years ago
So sorry for the late reply, Im sure you got an answer by now but no, I do not use a single "Raw" image. As a matter of fact I use up to 21 raw images to get the best dynamic range.
Thanks for stopping by
MaartePinoy 1 year ago
@MaartePinoy 21!!! thats insane :L
chaz9123 1 year ago
@MaartePinoy... 21raw images!!?? that is overkill. 3 images of -2, 0, +2 should give you plenty (*but that just personal opinion as with more images you get, the more needs cleaning up (moving foliage, clouds, water, boats etc.) actually im surprised that yours quiet sharp on foliage, no ghosting...
Some images are amazing (and some are overkill on glowing edges and too contrasty for my liking)!! My favorite is 2:31!
Can I ask what lens do u use for shooting your cars @6:31? Thanks very much!
vadimggg 1 year ago
what's this song?
anhtimmy 2 years ago
mb Photomatix - I think it is the easiest way to get HQ HDRI
i0wa88 2 years ago
Your are right on the money there! I love Matix but also use CS4 to give it that extra kick......
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
What program do you use to make The HDR pics?
I prefer Lighroom or MediaChance's HDR Program.
KaffeKent 2 years ago
I use Photomatix in conjunction with CS4.
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Great pictures! I really love them and you give me inspiration!
Greatings from Sweden!
KaffeKent 2 years ago
Thanks so much for the comment and I'am glad You were inspired. If there is any kind of help I can give You just let me know!
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
I appreciate all comments "Good & Bad". Even from folks that have no respect for others and no basis for judgment. I will not give You the satisfaction by replying in retaliation.
I guess the world needs folks like Yourself to balance out "Good & Bad" . Unfortunately since You reside on the Bad side, I pity Your 9year Son for having You as a Father to show him the way.
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
I have a tutorial on my channel
It shows where you get these halo's and overprocessed look from.
Everybody's personal taste, but to most people it looks just overprocessed instead of just vibrant or myserious
Do you have new photo's you can show? It would be interesting to see, cheers
ispaniola 2 years ago
I do have new images with no halos and oversaturation but have not put them in a form of a slideshow yet. Thank You for stopping by!
...Gina...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Ah ok, no problem
ciao
ispaniola 2 years ago
Very good pics, but a little to much on the HDR in my opinion. I would like to see a second generation and check the improvements. Great work though!
hugochka 2 years ago
An updated version of my current HDR sets are coming soon without over saturation ofcourse! Thanks for stopping by!
Gina
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
You-Tube is not flikr and so burnt out on slideshows to music. Though this one one has a standard exposure then HDR after which makes it a bit more interesting. A lot of them look a bit too cartoony for me though.
crsouser 2 years ago
These were from my early years of HDR which I agree were way too over saturated. I Thank You for stopping by!
Gina
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
it's so good they allow you to photograph at all those places. I wish we could do it as freely here
assa123assa123 2 years ago
I Thank You for the comment. Where would here be?
Gina
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
I mean here in Russia. Most museums and historical sites - either don't allow to arrange photographing or charge enormously. And I think you're much ahead in terms of special and maybe weird museums - we don't have many of them now.
assa123assa123 2 years ago
excellent.loved the images.just brilliant.
r1ch4rd69 2 years ago
Thanks Much for the comment. Got to post a newer set, these are my first generations images.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Awesome HDR!! 5 stars ...
Check out mine
stealth340 2 years ago
I Thank You for the rating!
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
I Thank You for Your comment Dom, If Your interested in receiving a free image let me know and I will email it to You
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
hey loving your images. looks like living in an oil painting
domstott86 2 years ago
Hi there,
its the usual love it ,or hate it thing. I know some of it i 've seen has been brill....so much so its even encouraged me to have a shot at the photmatic trial.....RESULTS..Totally rubbish..well, not strictly true, a couple of shots came out kinda cool BUT purely by luck rather than judgment. toooo many sliders to deal with.
Your stuff however is great ,altho' highly refective subjects seem a bit hit or miss(thinking of bike exhausts here, but wood grain really pops off the screen -)
Mpathize 2 years ago
Right You are on the Grain bit. I surely hope You get into it more as it is very addicting.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
interesting radial zoom effect at 6:25
atrc10 2 years ago
Correct You are, but before applying the radial I fractalized it.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Amazing pictures, but totally off topic, What is the first song at the beging of the video
marqugi 2 years ago
So sorry, I looked everywhere for the song but I cant seem to locate it!
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
My view on HDR photography is that it looks best half real/half painting. All if not most of these look like paintings for the most part. If you're using photomatix or some kind of program and barely editing them, i suggest doing the whole HDR proccess manually on photoshop or whatever program you use, they turn out so much more beautiful.
XentLP 2 years ago
I agree with you totally Xent! But limiting yourself just to one way of doing HDR defeats the purpose of exploring new ways of photography no matter how much editing or little is involved. As far as doing the whole HDR process simply with PS I have done that also but found that I save more time with Matix then PS after.
Well to each their own I guess and everybody has their own technique of editing.
I Thank You for your input as others that might be reading this may learn to love HDR.
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
don't worry you aren't the only one...but in my opinion HDR made the pictures look like they are a painting...I perfer the originals. Sorry :(
I'm just not used to all the edit of things.
ObsessedMusicFreak32 2 years ago
Thanks Much for the comment none the less! Always open to constructive criticism good and bad.
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Thanks Much for the comment and constructive criticism!
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
is there anyway to HDR images in PhotoShop 7.0?
thanks!
topsyturvytown 3 years ago
Sir\Maam,
So sorry, not familiar with 7.0. Not even sure if Elements does it either. But when You are ready with other software let me know and I'll do what I can to help You out.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
Thanks Ben!
topsyturvytown 3 years ago
Tops,
I forgot to mention to download the trial version of "Photomatix Pro" which will let You play around with HDR. Worth the download at least to get an idea of HDR.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
I just did it!
topsyturvytown 3 years ago
I think the HDR mode was added to photoshop in CS2 so Photoshop 7 would not have it. I am not 100% positive though.
triniclemist90 2 years ago
Thank you for quick response.
DCITYT 3 years ago
Amazing. I'm just starting to learn HDR technique. Is it fine to take 3 shots at diff. exposure or is it better to take more (5)?
DCITYT 3 years ago
3 is the minimum recommended but, the more the merrier. It's just more work. I've done some with only 2 and the results were mixed. Some good some not so good. In photography is always good to experiment and find "your groove".
babylatino56 3 years ago
these are not HDR
you have played around with these photos in photoshop, or whatever editing process you use
and you have created an unsharp mask
but you have not merged multiple shots of various exposure
THESE ARE NOT HDR
these are CARTOONAFIED
plewser2006 3 years ago
If You are familiar with "Photoshop" and "Photography" for that matter then You should know that HDR IS accomplished within Photoshop. As far as the "Unsharp Mask" You are speaking of it is mainly due to moving objects such as clouds captured in long exposures and had to be done with MULTIPLE shots to have that effect.
I appreciate the comment and constructive criticism and would love to see Your images of HDR so I may have a better understanding of the HDR process?
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
I thought hdr was accomplished with a program like photomatix...
rigsnet 3 years ago
HDR can be accomplished by Photomatix and other programs. I also have Photomatix and other programs. The only problem I have with them is they work at a minimum of 16bit tiff as your after generated file all the way to Your final edited image.
With Photoshop, automating an HDR all the way to the final image can be accomplished in 32bit format with much detailed and enhanced results. I still use Photomatix because it is quicker tone mapping with the program compared to PS.
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
Maam, Still awaiting Your HDR You were suppose to send Me. Please inform me when You post it here on You Tube so I can learn from a true master like Yourself.
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Hello there Master HDRtist I'am still waiting for Your HDR images? Or Your just another critic that has an opinion with nothing to back it up!
MaartePinoy 2 years ago
Most of the pictures were breath-taking, but some had too much saturation and haloing... I give a 8.5 out of 10...
wxb200 3 years ago
You are correct on the over saturation part on some of the images, I just left them as part of my slideshow to show the transition from the "Early days" of HDR to my new technique.
Thanks Much for the comment and rating!
...Ben...
MaartePinoy 3 years ago
Very impressive work.
wxb200 3 years ago
its amazing..5 stars
sNyoNz 3 years ago
ang ganda naman.very nice.
pinaytaba 3 years ago