go to the jidf website and click on "take action" (top right) scroll down to see the list of videos and youtubers they have disable with false accusations about "terms of use violations" then scroll down further to see the list they post for their jewish cronies to flag and make false claims against .....its time we took action against these psychotic assholes
wwwholocaustdenialvideoscom google it and wake up.....
It's called "I have a handy excuse to sit on my fat lazy apathetic ass and do nothing while I believe the horseshit that says I'm gonna get beamed up and don't have to do anything or take on any personal responsibility for what happens in the world around me."
Those kind have a slave mentality and thus deserve to be slaves.
I've long believed those who most deserve hell are the ones who think it's OK there is such a place.
It's time to stop hunkering down for the apocalypse.
Excellent observer on who is in control of the world and how they use the people for their own selfish needs. I love the outdoors scenery background as Alan Watt speaks to us.
the one thing i don't understand is that the elite make it illegal to commit suicide. wtf?? they don't care about us & wish us dead, yet, hate it if we did it ourselves. what if we wanted to help them out and we voluntarily wanted to go to a fema camp and die in the gas chamber? put me to sleep and then OUT
@MopDMTBARTL, the Elite's plan for total enslavement is a very slow, well thought out process that's been taking shape over thousands of years. The trick to creating their one-world dictatorship is getting people to slowly and gradually accept it over time, as power becomes more centralized over the advancing years. Most of the masses are still morally against suicide (as we SHOULD be), so for now they pretend they're against it. They do very well at poisoning and killing us covertly, though.
Makes me wonder if we will ever truly know freedom. Life is what we make it? I'd like it to be free from oppression by anybody.I wonder what the human race will evolve into? What is the meaning of life? Does anybody really know the answer?
I get the feeling that Stealth is Bias towards the Pharmacudical Companies. He sounds more like a Spokesman than just your average Opinionated person.
@RandyBful1 Hard as it may seem , you have got to love people like SSTTEEAALLTTHH he is so much a product of our times and he really can't help being the way his/she is. I'd bet he's a he though. "Forgive them for they know not what they do". He will see the error of his ways finally. Just love him and wish him well and be on your way to help someone who isn't a total numby.
@zacthebold Inform people to go to youtube, and get the real news, pass out business cards... Tell them to google the black pope, 17 evil powerful satanical families are controlling the planet. All wars were false flags, they benefit Wallstreet, Fed, bankers, insurance companies, corporate hitlers like Halliburton. Read the Kings James Bible... all churches have been hijacked just like Hitler did, telling people lies, some truth, but most lies.
Alex, have you thought about switching to a Blue-Ray format? You will then be able to fit 25GB worth of video and information on your DVDs. I also think that audio CDs should switch to Blue-Ray, since CDs don't have a great bit-rate to upload to a computer.
The people are waking, ANGRY! Think how many people you know, who used to laugh and deny this stuff? Well, many aren't laughing anymore, are they? Many people I know, are saying, "HOLY SHIT!!" they were right! They are Arming up too, preparing for the gathering darkness.. People are realizing, that the danger is to ALL OF US! Time to drop the petty BS, and stand together against these statist slavers!
12:00 Is that a cigarette? I was wondering why it when from the bookshelf backdrop to the night sky. I guess when you think about this stuff it's Depressing.
OK AJ! It is all old news. They are trying to impose martial law, take our guns and imprison us etc Why don't you have anything to say about PALESTINE where it is happening NOW
@afro208 But we don't breed like flies. If everybody crowds into cities, then yes crowding becomes an issue. But the cities aren't the only place to live. Yes there are draw backs to living in the country, BUT! The notion that there is no room for people to live, is completly false. Not to mention there are ways to make cities more efficient with fuel and energy.
@afro208 I know it was a lil off topic. I was just making a point about the whole breeding like flies thing you said. As if humans having children could be compared to pest like flies. I just disagree with the notion that there is some mystical number of humans that the world can suport. They want us to think too many people are the problem, but that's a lie. If they can print money to save banks, why can't they do the same to feed the poor and starving?
@dwiggles1 my breeding like flies comment was more akin to the classic 'jar of flies' experiment you do in high school. badly worded. Money has nothing to do with it, you cant eat money, and I'm not talking short term. At some point you can only feed, house and educate so many people and have them live at a certain standard of living. It's not a mystical number. Simple matter of resources. It's a finite world with finite resources that cannot support an infinite number of people.
@afro208 just pointing out it is a form of eugenics performed for subjugation purposes. Blacks are the most subjugated group, and simultaneously they are the most circumcised.
@gingowitch explain to me how circumcision subjugates a person. I'd like to know. I've been to Africa and Egypt, they've been practising it there for thousands of years. The egyptians even had a god fo circumcision whose job was to maintain the fertility of the Nile banks
@afro208 It makes the man's head smaller than it should be. Therefore it is a plot to subjugate a man. The foreskin is there for a reason. A Powerful reason. To pump energy to the head of a man. Only the priests in Zulu and Egyptian cultures circumcised. Today the Egyptians do because of Islam (which ironically means "submission") and the Zulus are being pounded by evil western scientists trying to tell them circumcision stops AIDS, which is false.
@dorodini Unfortunately this is the case. But there is such a thing as foreskin restoration which every circumcised man should know about. Visit TLCtugger . com and foregen . org for more information. The glans head can be made as sensitive as it was and a new foreskin can be made into existance.
Perhaps this man's heart is in the right place, perhaps it is not. What is clear is that this man who devotes most of the interview to "eugenics" does not even know the simple history of the discovery of the gene, and I therefore do not trust his supposed knowledge of history.
RE: 0:20 - The discovery of the gene and the double helix happened a century apart. The gene was discovered by Gregor Mendel in his experiments with pea plants in the 1850's and 1860's by his observation of the mathematical rule of 3:1 (1/4) expression of phenotypes when crossbreeding the pea plants which are otherwise self-pollinating. It makes perfect sense a mathematician would be employed in this field in the 1920s as all conclusions to this point were drawn mathematically based on ratio.
@gingowitch he's smarter than to waste his time on such a bullshit, baseless argument. you just don't learn, do you? that your argument is completely irrelevant to anything important in taking back OUR FREEDOMS AND FREE MINDS.... go ahead and respond, like always, with your crazy rants about how you think you are so in the know... again, I won't read it or respond to it. (straight to the trash) hopefully though, you will eventually learn to spend your time advocating for something that matters.
@theblackmanOyeah bahaha. you think you are so superior you know better than millions of years of evolution. Please do read this, and tell me, did your doctor know better than millions of years of evolution when he cut your foreskin off? I think not. He was most likely like any other Western man - a masturbator that thinks life is the way it is because that's the way it seems, without a notion of what a higher state of mind means or feels like because he ejaculated so much he damaged his bod
@thecoolerstinger Ok, BUT, the forces of evil in modern society are PROMOTING circumcision, something unheard of in ancient times or in the middle ages.
@gingowitch I agree, but look at the whole of what they are doing. Monsanto has gone completely Nazi, they are growing GMO corn with pesticides in it that is poisoning the lakes and streams out west with Bt toxin. They are modifying salmon and the FDA won't label it as GMO modified. They are feeding livestock with this GMO garbage. And then they are sending SWAT teams to farmers markets and small farms of people who want to grow their own food. Chemicals in everything man.
@thecoolerstinger I meant to say promoting masturbation AND circumcision in my last post. I understand your concerns over the food. I too am very worried. I drink distilled water in glass containers and eat organic vegetarian and dairy foods. Nevertheless, a secret about not ejaculating your life energy away is that this life energy over time will be transferred to the different parts of your body and even inside your bones, to fortify your body. This is an excellent way to defeat chemicals
Eugenics is a lesser evil than dysgenics. There is no status quo. Either there is some kind of selection pressure which favours positive traits (health, intelligence, good nature) or you end up with decay and degeneration. It's a simple fact of nature.
Alan Watt is a fantastic speaker and very knowledgeable on history who did what to who and why. He is very observant in the happenings today and who are doing it to the people and why. We are being dumb down intentionally by the schools and mainstream media. Less people means more for the Insiders.
This is very intelligent. It's been written about before. The big question is: Where do we go? Or..what do we do about it? Seriously. If that group is that powerful what hope is there for individuals to change a thing. Like the cows waiting in line at a slaugtherhouse.
What bothers me is the view counts on these videos. Really? Only 3 thousand? I can only hope YouTube is manipulating the count to appear lower than it actually is. If not, we are in sad shape.
Please everybody read "the gods of Eden" by William Bramley. It explains that this manipulation has been going on our entire hystory in a similarly clear manner as mr Allen Watt does.
Sure it is. But there is no need to paint us off as the scum of the Earth. Alex Jones seems to dislike scientists, he dislikes geneticists, climatologists, immunologists, etc.
I went to your schools, I read your essays, I've been through your system, I got grades like a good little slave... and then I woke up. Have you ever watched Alex Jones explain why, regardless of course or faculty, they will ask first-year university students to play a game of life-boat? First trimester in school I too was asked to play life-boat; it was at an Introductory English course (?!) I know from personal experience that he is telling the truth about eugenics brainwashing.
You said you read essays. You took a semester-long Social Studies of Science. I studied Biomedical Sciences, i was not taught eugenics were good. No offense, but how does your semester-long experience hold up against over 5 years genetics?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I was responding to your condescending suggestion that I haven't read up on the issue and need a history lesson. The only scientists I know who study something in order to debunk it are atheists doing comparative religion. Everyone else is going to vow by the legitimacy of their field, so I'm not surprised you are respoding the way you do, insisting against all evidence that contemporary genetics is good and noble, and that eugenics was just a black page out of history.
Are we going to turn this into a straw-man argument were you attack me for being an atheist? For the record, i never attempt to use science to debunk the idea of a God. God is unfalsifiable and i have no need to take people's comfort in a God-figure. However we can debunk books like the Quran and the Bible, showing people to use their own mind instead of taking the word of 2000-year old goat herders, and that's all I hope to achieve with atheism. Skepticism.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH What are you talking about? I am a totally godless atheist myself. You're the one who is biased here, thinking that only religious people want to argue the merits of science with you.
@mariatechnosux "The only scientists I know who study something in order to debunk it are atheists doing comparative religion." Than you don't know a lot of scientists. Because the fundamentals of science are that any scientific theory needs to provide evidence and be falsifiable. People studied Lamarckian evolution to prove it wrong. Even Hawkin's theory of black holes losing information was disproved. Trying to debunk is an essential part of any scientific process.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH There is a difference between studying Marx to prove his economic theories wrong, and studying economics itself to prove economics itself wrong. No one is going to study genetics (ie contemporary eugenics) to prove that genetics (ie eugenics) itself is wrong. Read a bit of Bourdieu if you don't understand this argument.
Genetics does not equal eugenics. As i have demonstrated earlier, it's perfectly possible to believe in natural selection and not start selecting yourself. Every time scientists cure someone of a disease, every time you take your hay-fever-pills we are violating natural selection because we are not selecting people for their resistance to an illness, but curing them all, so they can all reproduce and pass on their genes. No problem. Perfectly possible.
Genetics is the study of genes, heredity and variation in the field of Biology. How can you proof an area of studies wrong? That's like proving math wrong. It makes no sense. You can disprove a mathematical equation or theory, but you can't disprove mathematics. It's just a field of study.
Eugenics on the other hand is "cience of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics". Big difference.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH And the fact that the overwhelming majority of people on this planet are still unaware of that fact should tell you something about the impact of that insight on their lives. That's how all science functions under the NWO: you scientists discover something only to keep the overwhelming majority of the population from knowing about it.
What? No we don't. We're lucky if even half of the morons out there understand a jack about it. Take global warming. So many people are claiming it's all a myth, when most of them couldn't even foretell the weather if they got a map of pressure-zones. Yet they act as if they are climatologists with years of experience. We can't help that. Ideas are out there, we can't help it if you can't comprehend them or they don't fit your agenda or technophobia.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ever followed the 'open access publishing' debate? How about reading the 'Berlin Declaration'? Ever accessed the 'arxiv' website? Those all prove that you scientists are hoarding research information that is more often than not funded by the tax paying public that cannot see it yet is affected by it.
Yes, it's called copyright. A system with which I do not agree, but it's there. You're tax money also funds movies that you may not distribute, doesn't it?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ha, not anymore! We just got ourselves a Christo-fascist-libertarian government here in the Netherlands, which said it will get rid of all art subsidies (not of science subsidies, of course, they still need to pay the Ab Osterhauses of this world tax-payer money to produce the NWO soft-kill weapons)
Yes, that would be smart if we didn't spent years of our time and millions to find treatments that actually work and created vaccines. Vaccines are a lot cheaper then cures, so wouldn't it be more convenient to just let children get polio and then sell them life-long supplies of medicine? And again, how does this fit in with eugenics?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "And again, how does this fit in with eugenics?" Well, you've just answered it yourself: "Vaccines are a lot cheaper then cures". You people do what's cheap, not what's right. If culling is cheap, you'll take care of that too.
By they way, no one is stopping you from actually buying a scientific review once in a while. I could give you some recommendations, or even a magazine like Scientific American has it's charms. But don't blame scientists for being restricted by copyright-laws. We don't decide whether or not our articles get published freely, the reviews, universities and funders do that. But I don't agree, personally I believe, if there was no copyright, this would boost scientific progress.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ever read the actual research versus the press release for the mass media? I have! And if you actually followed the open access publishing debate, you should now that they are not restricted by copyrights as you claim, they themselves opted not to start arxiv journals. They were free to, they just didn't *want* to. For obvious reasons (deliberate hoarding).
You want to be able to see articles, but when you do you say you don't need to see them because they are manipulated? Then just stop whining. Either you buy the reviews, which contain exactly the same articles as those you would pay online for, or you don't. What we hope to accomplish with hoarding? Amuse me.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You're twisting my words. I said that press releases have almost nothing to do with the actual research, if you can get ahold of it and read it for yourself. You are asking me to read digests/press-releases, I am saying such digests are used an excuse not to provide access to the actual research. As for what you have to gain from hoarding, ask your Big Pharma financiers, I'm sure they'll gladly spell it out for you.
Every single drug ever created, every pill you take is weakening the gene pool, because it gives you the advantage to survive with your particular illness and still reproduce and pass those genes on. Your offspring will get the same pills. However, no scientist in his right mind will claim that we should stop treating people because of this or he/she will probably be discredited by the great majority. Every cure or treatment ever developed is contradictory to eugenics.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You've just figured out why a lot of us listen to Alex Jones: because he interviews the doctors who do exactly that. Look up his interviews with Dr Sherry Tenpenny. The reason why I might need to take these drugs you speak of is because the NMO has poluted the environment so much (chemtrails etc) that it has lowered my natural immunity to fight off disease. Or will you insist that environmental polution is a conspiracy theory too?
So you think your body couldn't get cancer if not for chemicals?
Oh no, the vaccine story... How many people actually died of the vaccine? How many died of the flue? Take your choice. By the way, this again, has nothing to do with eugenics does it? I never worked on this vaccine, never got it myself but i'll admit it reeks like someone didn't do their job right. However, this is one vaccine out of a thousand (polio, hepatitis B, A, rubella, tetanus, TBC, etc
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Not, that's not what I am saying, I am saying that should I ever get cancer, my body will not be able to fight it because polution by the NWO will have destroyed my natural defense mechanisms. However, if get cancer, it IS most likely because of all the NWO polution, as the overwhelming majority of cancers are environmental. I haven't even gone into vaccines. You brought up that issue.
Yes, but of all environmental cause of cancer, you control most. Diet, smoking, drugs, alcohol, etc. Pollution certainly doesn't do it any good, but you can live healthy.
Then why are we, scientists, currently working on ways to teach your immune system to attack cancer, if we are out to kill you?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH What are you talking about? What treatment is teaching cancer patients'immune suppressed bodies to fight cancer? Cancer patients in 2010 are receiving the exact same treatment my grandfather did in the mid 1980s: chemical poisoning and/or radiation. The treatment hasn't changed in 25 years.
Your body isn't immune suppressed. I told you "testing", as in not common use yet. Go to Google scholar and search ffs. Oh right, you think that's manipulated. Then you obviously have never heard of monoclonal antibodies, herceptine, imatinib, RNAi, gene therapy, anti-angiogenics, etc. We also work on early detection by searching for markers and making techniques like micro arrays cheaper.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "cheaper" for whom? David de Rothschild? The Queen of England? "Cheap" for them is still astronomically unaffordable to the rest of us "worthless eaters"!
Euhm, if you could think coherently for a few seconds... Cheaper for the people who have to purchase it maybe? Vaccines unaffordable? Are you telling me you live in a Western country with healthcare and can't afford a vaccin? But you'd rather see your child taking medication and being oxygen-sustained for the rest of his/her life? Don't bullshit me.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I pay 12X90 euros a year on semi-privatized semi-socialized healthcare, because health-insurance is mandatory and the Dutch government can seize your bank-account and fine you if you don't voluntairily sign up. I'm not bulls*ing you. If I get *one* vaccination, I have to pay an extra 165 euros on top of all that other money, because I dared make use of the health-care system, and the 165 fee is punishment for doing so. As you can imagine, I don't want your vaccines.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I have! Have the NWO, who are deliberately poluting the world, causing everyone to have suppressed immune systems? The same peoeple who gave us nuclear bombs in the name of advanced science are lecturing us about "prevention is better than the cure"? Don't make me laugh. "Prevention is better than the cure" so let's prevent people from existing. That's eugenics!
Nuclear bombs? What does that have to do with vaccines? Prevent which people from existing? What are you talking about? Are you still sane in the head?
You go tell people on the street you feel they should no longer get vaccinated and rather get ill, pay tuns for treatment and take the risk of dying. Let's see how much people will appreciate that. People who oppose vaccination are more eugenicists that any of the things you blame scientists of. When given the ability to prevent, you feel people should just get sick and whoever is the strongest should survive. How do you call that?
The creator of Gardasil *herself*, admitted the vaccine did more harm than good.
And, anyways, you don't need to be a genious to go and read the studies about the incredible autoimmune reactions caused by lipidic molecules used as adjuvants in these new generation vaccines.
Regardless, HPV is one more Holywood-like made up monster. The incidence rate is incredibly low, compared to all the ridiculous hype about it, and Pap screenings are just enough, in most cases.
Even if every women got screened every 3 years as recommended and by some magic we never saw a pap-smear beyond CIN II about 22% of those will progress into invasive cancer. Not everyone get's screened though, not even within an effective timespan. If this was the case we would never see CIN II or CIN III pap-smears.
And yes, cancer is an horrible condition, and that is why people should beware of vaccines; since vaccine solutions for most vaccines are filled with carcinogenic substances, from all the residual RNA/DNA coming from the celular tissues where vaccine is grown.
Sadly, people only tend to know about Salk's issue with the SV40 and other simian viruses. Unfortunately most vaccine preparations are teeming with carcinogens.
There is little residual DNA/RNA in vaccines when properly prepared, not to mention these strands are lysated. Fragments of DNA/RNA can't do any damage in the aren't inserted into cells with the accompanying viral/bacterial proteins. If transfecting cells was that easy, we wouldn't have to spend more time perfecting actual carriers and transfectors than actually developing gene therapies.
Multiple mechanisms such as ADAR's deal with free genomic material in the cell. When you don't inject any integrase with full strands or ADAR-inhibitors the risk of developing a tumor from the small amount of fragmented genome that remains in a vaccine is abysmal.
Since when does prevalation mean we shouldn't allow a vaccine? This is an actual cancer we can prevent. Do you know what a hell cancer is to cure when metastased? Cancer cells are specifically selected in your body to not undergo apoptosis, to avoid their own death at any cost. The incidence of Merkel cell cancer is abysmal, but so is the prognosis (look it up, it's horrible). This is a cancer could possibly vaccinate for. You want to deny people that because of incidence?
I mentioned prevalence only in reference to the comparative sensacionalism that is promoted by governments and big pharma on what regards HPV. It isn't that widespread and it isn't that dangerous. But it shows how propaganda machines can create virtual monsters out of thin air.
Anyway, I wouldn't be against an HPV vaccine if it had any assurance of quality or safety. And that just isn't the case with Gardasil and Cervarix, as the creator of Gardasil herself later came to admit.
Gardasil and cervarix can, like any vaccine, evoke an over-elaborate immune response in some people, but so can any drug. You don't know that kind of stuff in advance.No drug is safe for everyone to use, but i can assure you quality checks are being done to the vaccines and drugs that leave and it doesn't take much for them to be revoked or at least publicly discredited.
I am aware of the stories surrounding Gardasil, as there are stories for Cervarix, HBV vaccines, polio vaccines, rubella vaccines, tetanus-shots, HBA vaccines, and virtually ever other vaccine ever developed. All vaccines that have undoubtedly saved countless lives and contrary to conspiracy theorists and religious nuts showed no correlation with any of the adverse effects claims in actual peer-reviewed articles.
If you are not feeling well after the first shot of a vaccine, you don't have to take the second and third (and sometimes fourth) by the way, just like it says on every PIL of every drug to immediately stop taking the drugs at any sign of discomfort other than the expected effects (such as fatigue mostly) and contact your physician to ask for further advice. Why would we do this if we we're trying to poison people?
Do you know what the cervical cancer vaccine costs? Gardasil or Cervarix? Doesn't even matter, most western countries provided it for free. Do you know what the, prevalence and 5-year survival rate of cervical cancer are? More so, do you know what cancer-treatments costs? So it very obscure as to why you would prefer to get cervical cancer and pay 10000's of euro's for treatment, and maybe die nonetheless, when you have the option of getting a relatively cheap vaccine.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "why you would prefer to get cervical cancer". HPV is a sexually transmitted disease. Are you suggesting/fantasizing I'm having unsafe sex? And then you woke up, sir! Let me remind everyone of that ridiculous excuse "Boys need the HPV vaccine too, cos they will have oral sex" you technocrats came up with to jab little boys as well. As for the costs, a professor at my university wrote a whole article about the HPV vaccine and how it was a total waste of money.
Wrong. First of all HPV is not a disease itself, it's a family of virii. It can be transferred by any physical contact, mucosal membranes or even by touching mutual objects. Pathology isn't really your thing, that's clear by now. HPV-16 and HPV-18 can cause cervical cancer if they integrate in the cervical epithelial layer, ow they got there can be by a variety of circumstances.
Which university? More importantly, how many people even peer-reviewed the article?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH " Pathology isn't really your thing, that's clear by now." Suuure, sure, and that's cos I've only read fluffy conspiracy theory texts on HPV, such as Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Laura A. Koutsky, Kathleen L. Stine, et al., "Genital Human Papillomavirus in Women Who Have Sex With Women", Journal of Infectious Disease Diseases, vol. 178, 1604-09, 1998. Clearly I'm uniformed and don't know what the hell I'm on about :-D
You read 2 peer-reviewed articles and you think you are an expert on HPV, vaccination and immunology? You called HPV a disease that could only be transferred sexually and be prevented by using a condom. So yes, you are not really what i would call educated on the subject of HPV and resulting cancers.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Let's see, you chide Youtube users telling them: "Do you expect me to educate you on the subject over a YT video thread", yet you expect ME to post my full reading-list over a YT thread? I just gave you one example of the kind of research I've been reading. Clearly you don't get the hint.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH The point is that you are accusing us of being uninformed, refusing to consult mainstream sources, only bothering with conspiracy theories. I have shown you that, where we *can* (I've demonstrated that you scientists hoard information), we have already consulted mainstream sources, and have reached our own conclusions, which are not the conclusions the mainstream wants us to reach. My conclusion is that the NWO eugenics agenda conspiracy theory has a whole lot of merit to it.
Vaccinating everyone with Gardasil or Cervarix would be too expensive. So if we eradicate the virus in females, there is no need to do so in men who have oral sex, since the females can no longer infect the males. The males can't transfer the virus to vaccinated females if they have it, so the virus slowly runs out of carriers. With the exception of homosexual men perhaps because this is man-man transfer, homosexuals can go get a vaccine if they want to.
Safe sex does not protect you entirely from HPV. Numerous studies have been done on this subject and if you really have as much knowledge on the subject of genetics as you claim you do, you'd know this.
Natural defense mechanism? Hate to break it to you, but ever heard of polio, small pox etc? Disease your immune system couldn't do anything about. Science fixed that. Thanks to scientists, polio and smallpox are now eradicated. Again, no eugenics to be found, i'm still waiting for someone to tell me how this links up to Alan Watt's incoherent eugenics-ramblings.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Thanks to scientists they were put into a petridish and converted into bioweapons, that the NWO can hold over our heads like a Damoclean sword and threaten us with: "Submit to the global slave-grid, do as we say, or Al Qaida (NWO itself) will release the bioweapon plague".
"Submit to the global slave-grid, do as we say, or Al Qaida (NWO itself) will release the bioweapon plague" I didn't get that message, when did they supposedly say this?
You've got it bad, don't you?
You would understand jack of actual raw scientific data, and you know that as well as I do. People can't even understand stuff like global warming when you put it into a documentary and you expect those morons to be able to process raw scientific data?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Great, let's follow your arrogant logic: if we "worthless eaters" are all morons who can't read scientific data, why not just put it all out there? According to you, we are all too dumb to read it anyway. So what's to fear?
It's not my fear. The only thing publishers do before we bring in an article is make it understandable. If the person who did that research reads his own article in a review and it's altered in anyway all hell will brake loose, trusts me, professors and doctors can be pretty confectionist when it comes to their reviews.
I didn't say "you" (whoever you meant by that) are all worthless morons. But yes, many people are morons.
You can't say all geneticists are bad because of one vaccine gone wrong. You don't say all doctors are bad because one screwed up, do you. And this whole thing still doesn't fit with your supposed "geneticists want eugenics"-theory.
Eugenics was a black page in history. Stop acting as if the majority of scientists are out to destroy mankind. Science has created horrible things such as the atomic bomb but is has also tripled the life expectancy of average humans in 500 years from 25 to 75 years. I don't act as if Monsanto isn't evil as fuck, but stop acting as if scientist are trained to kill humans at the university.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH When you suppose a claim such as "Eugenics was a black page in history. Stop acting as if the majority of scientists are out to destroy mankind" you should have empirical evidence to back this claim or it is your own bigotry.To make this claim you would need objective evidence of the "majority of scientists" personal beliefs not what they publicly state.And there public support of "climate change" and collectivism/statism are contrary to your statements.
Considering you are the conspiracy theorist, you should provide the evidence once in a while, from a source other than prisonplanetdotcom r conspiracydotorg etc. Pubicly state? When did scientists publicly state eugenics are good? You provide me with evidence of that.
Oh shit, it's a climate-change denier. May I ask what your degree in Climatology is? May I ask on what model you are basing your view? Which scientists do you work with?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I'm sorry ad-hominem attacks and redirecting the conversation are not arguments.You put forth that " the majority" of scientist do not share the eugenics ideology, therefore you have to provide empirical evidence.Correct me if I am wrong, but the whole ideology behind the "anthropogenic climate change" is that you can use FORCE / legislation/ regulation against human beings who are "causing""climate change".And that 3rd world countrys should not be aloud to develop industry.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Not letting 3rd world countries develop there own industrial base while the western countries expand there own is eugenics!.Once again if you put forth a hypothesis/theory it is up to you to provide EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE,you claim anthropogenic warming then you have to provide proof !! throwing around ad- hominems and parroted conclusions is a poor substitute for a methodology based on logic.If you support the use of force to stop "climate change" then by default u support euginics
Call that whatever you like, but it has nothing to do with selecting better genes and I don't see how geneticists decide whether or not there should be industry in Africa.
Eugenics has nothing to do with climate change. Grab a dictionary.
Proof? Again, google scholar. Or buy a review. Or go read a book. Get some level of education before making general claims about global warming.
Is that a cigarette in his hand at 12:00?
BlueReishiMan 6 months ago 2
I know it's stupid. But I just got totally jealous of Alan's knowledge. I wish I could download what he knows into my brain.
BlueReishiMan 7 months ago
now i know how neo felt when he came out of the matrix
redbaron932 10 months ago
Brilliant and inspiring as usual Alan.
A thousand blessings be upon you.
Peace & Rage
circleofrage 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go to the jidf website and click on "take action" (top right) scroll down to see the list of videos and youtubers they have disable with false accusations about "terms of use violations" then scroll down further to see the list they post for their jewish cronies to flag and make false claims against .....its time we took action against these psychotic assholes
wwwholocaustdenialvideoscom google it and wake up.....
fuckystoat 1 year ago
wicked...........
knucklebutty 1 year ago
alan watt is excellent
eccentricity00 1 year ago
@Omoore1979
It's called "I have a handy excuse to sit on my fat lazy apathetic ass and do nothing while I believe the horseshit that says I'm gonna get beamed up and don't have to do anything or take on any personal responsibility for what happens in the world around me."
Those kind have a slave mentality and thus deserve to be slaves.
I've long believed those who most deserve hell are the ones who think it's OK there is such a place.
It's time to stop hunkering down for the apocalypse.
waypasthadenough 1 year ago
Comment removed
metalways 1 year ago
Comment removed
metalways 1 year ago
Comment removed
metalways 1 year ago
Comment removed
metalways 1 year ago
Comment removed
metalways 1 year ago
Excellent observer on who is in control of the world and how they use the people for their own selfish needs. I love the outdoors scenery background as Alan Watt speaks to us.
starlight1946 1 year ago 8
the one thing i don't understand is that the elite make it illegal to commit suicide. wtf?? they don't care about us & wish us dead, yet, hate it if we did it ourselves. what if we wanted to help them out and we voluntarily wanted to go to a fema camp and die in the gas chamber? put me to sleep and then OUT
truthknowledge. com
MopDMTBARTL 1 year ago
@MopDMTBARTL, the Elite's plan for total enslavement is a very slow, well thought out process that's been taking shape over thousands of years. The trick to creating their one-world dictatorship is getting people to slowly and gradually accept it over time, as power becomes more centralized over the advancing years. Most of the masses are still morally against suicide (as we SHOULD be), so for now they pretend they're against it. They do very well at poisoning and killing us covertly, though.
MrAntinet 11 months ago
Benjamin Franklin
Also considered Germans
A "swarthy people"
Di0genesus 1 year ago
Makes me wonder if we will ever truly know freedom. Life is what we make it? I'd like it to be free from oppression by anybody.I wonder what the human race will evolve into? What is the meaning of life? Does anybody really know the answer?
Tomorrow is another day.
dynotuner 1 year ago
I get the feeling that Stealth is Bias towards the Pharmacudical Companies. He sounds more like a Spokesman than just your average Opinionated person.
moningis 1 year ago
the dark energy worshipn bastards must be CRUSHED!SAME WITH THE CORRUPT BANKERS AND CORPORATIONS-CRUSH THEM!
delta3sLeader05 1 year ago
KILLUMINATI
they are not "elites", THEY ARE PARASITES! call them by their proper names please.
souijin 1 year ago
Alan Watt is far more wiser and intelligent than Alex Jones. Alex is a sensationalist and a fear monger and has created a cult of personality.
7ru7h533kr 1 year ago
Great speaker!
So much good info!
I've watched part 1 & 2,
and I feel 5 years wiser!
But then, since my eyes were opened 3 years ago that's happened more, so I feel like 500 years old now ;-)
WordWakNed 1 year ago
@WordWakNed Excellent post and I know exactly what you mean
mikeoli 1 year ago
@RandyBful1 Hard as it may seem , you have got to love people like SSTTEEAALLTTHH he is so much a product of our times and he really can't help being the way his/she is. I'd bet he's a he though. "Forgive them for they know not what they do". He will see the error of his ways finally. Just love him and wish him well and be on your way to help someone who isn't a total numby.
susieham 1 year ago
@susieham
No i won't/ Look up Dunning-Krueger syndrome. Then try the solution. Ed-u-ca-tion.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@susieham
I love how you put in the bible-quote. That explains a lot.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
Watchhhhhh
youtube.com/watch?v=AanQ2mY2jjc
PhilosopherKG 1 year ago
So what are we supposed to do about all of this? Any practical ideas?
zacthebold 1 year ago
@zacthebold Inform people to go to youtube, and get the real news, pass out business cards... Tell them to google the black pope, 17 evil powerful satanical families are controlling the planet. All wars were false flags, they benefit Wallstreet, Fed, bankers, insurance companies, corporate hitlers like Halliburton. Read the Kings James Bible... all churches have been hijacked just like Hitler did, telling people lies, some truth, but most lies.
KamikazeKoscki 1 year ago
Well the "elite" have gone all in with this finacial collapse.
celnuk 1 year ago
watch?v=_qzKcGKTbaM
watch?v=u2ePhkVO4_4
watch?v=77o9KwxUG4E
cbm0rr0w 1 year ago
Alex, have you thought about switching to a Blue-Ray format? You will then be able to fit 25GB worth of video and information on your DVDs. I also think that audio CDs should switch to Blue-Ray, since CDs don't have a great bit-rate to upload to a computer.
jaymthegenius 1 year ago
Wow you must be retarded writing comments like that
Tommy1153 1 year ago
THE NEW WORLD WILL BE ISOLATED
THEN SOCIALIST RUSSIA WILL TAKE OVER
ysnsws 1 year ago
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake up
FEMA CAMPS WIll BE iN MIDDLE EAST
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE UP
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE up HUMANITY
JEWS AND IRAN WORKS TOGETHER
ysnsws 1 year ago
Where's sunday
Tommy1153 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
awesome....
thanks to the crew at infowars.com for such a fantastic interview.
Alan Watt is on the ball !
genuine to say the least!
everythingisfake1973 1 year ago
ummmmmm why have birth rates not dropped approximately 80% then
thevuduchild 1 year ago
The people are waking, ANGRY! Think how many people you know, who used to laugh and deny this stuff? Well, many aren't laughing anymore, are they? Many people I know, are saying, "HOLY SHIT!!" they were right! They are Arming up too, preparing for the gathering darkness.. People are realizing, that the danger is to ALL OF US! Time to drop the petty BS, and stand together against these statist slavers!
talltommy46 1 year ago 14
12:00 Is that a cigarette? I was wondering why it when from the bookshelf backdrop to the night sky. I guess when you think about this stuff it's Depressing.
Reclaim19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stuff They Dont Want You To Know, here: stdwytk dot blogspot dot com (with no ’’donate’’ button !!!)
boldhero44 1 year ago
Comment removed
frickadele 1 year ago
If you marry family members...
doesn't your brain go....
stupid?
That's what we're told, at least.
Maybe sleeping with daddy or your cousin....
keeps your dna strong.
You sleep with another tribe...it becomes bud lite. Bad beer.
frickadele 1 year ago
OK AJ! It is all old news. They are trying to impose martial law, take our guns and imprison us etc Why don't you have anything to say about PALESTINE where it is happening NOW
sharkattack1313 1 year ago
if stupid people keep having more children than intelligent people we are all fucked.
Iron1023 1 year ago
Population reduction by govt mandate? LOL, OK you first! When the time comes, I'll gladly help you along..
talltommy46 1 year ago
Great insight.
yozzaful 1 year ago
eugenics is evil. Discussing population growth is not. we cant breed like flies forever.
afro208 1 year ago
@afro208 But we don't breed like flies. If everybody crowds into cities, then yes crowding becomes an issue. But the cities aren't the only place to live. Yes there are draw backs to living in the country, BUT! The notion that there is no room for people to live, is completly false. Not to mention there are ways to make cities more efficient with fuel and energy.
dwiggles1 1 year ago
@dwiggles1 i never said anything about no room or cities. sounds like you know all the answers to the questions never asked.
afro208 1 year ago
@afro208 I know it was a lil off topic. I was just making a point about the whole breeding like flies thing you said. As if humans having children could be compared to pest like flies. I just disagree with the notion that there is some mystical number of humans that the world can suport. They want us to think too many people are the problem, but that's a lie. If they can print money to save banks, why can't they do the same to feed the poor and starving?
dwiggles1 1 year ago
@dwiggles1 my breeding like flies comment was more akin to the classic 'jar of flies' experiment you do in high school. badly worded. Money has nothing to do with it, you cant eat money, and I'm not talking short term. At some point you can only feed, house and educate so many people and have them live at a certain standard of living. It's not a mystical number. Simple matter of resources. It's a finite world with finite resources that cannot support an infinite number of people.
afro208 1 year ago
@afro208 circumcision is evil. Black people are the most circumcised race in America for a reason. Think about it.
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch ok tiger no idea what u r on about. I'm not black or jewish btw. I have curly blond hair hence the nickname.
afro208 1 year ago
@afro208 just pointing out it is a form of eugenics performed for subjugation purposes. Blacks are the most subjugated group, and simultaneously they are the most circumcised.
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch explain to me how circumcision subjugates a person. I'd like to know. I've been to Africa and Egypt, they've been practising it there for thousands of years. The egyptians even had a god fo circumcision whose job was to maintain the fertility of the Nile banks
afro208 1 year ago
@afro208 It makes the man's head smaller than it should be. Therefore it is a plot to subjugate a man. The foreskin is there for a reason. A Powerful reason. To pump energy to the head of a man. Only the priests in Zulu and Egyptian cultures circumcised. Today the Egyptians do because of Islam (which ironically means "submission") and the Zulus are being pounded by evil western scientists trying to tell them circumcision stops AIDS, which is false.
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch cicumcision is a mark of servitude , the same as with cattle and thats what they think we are just cattle for the slaughter.
dorodini 1 year ago
@dorodini Unfortunately this is the case. But there is such a thing as foreskin restoration which every circumcised man should know about. Visit TLCtugger . com and foregen . org for more information. The glans head can be made as sensitive as it was and a new foreskin can be made into existance.
gingowitch 1 year ago
@afro208,
Why? Flies do and it's not a problem.
Nature is dominant and mans ego blinds him.
MikePresents2 1 year ago
He is the NWO puppet!
SirSmokeAlot42O 1 year ago
Obama Loves the Cock! Get his ilegal ass out of office!
SirSmokeAlot42O 1 year ago
@SirSmokeAlot42O in some scenes of obama's speeches he demonstrates Masturbation or homosexual crippling of the body, from my own observations.
gingowitch 1 year ago
Perhaps this man's heart is in the right place, perhaps it is not. What is clear is that this man who devotes most of the interview to "eugenics" does not even know the simple history of the discovery of the gene, and I therefore do not trust his supposed knowledge of history.
GimpSuit99 1 year ago
dominant and recessive
not
superior and inferior
hustler3of4culture3 1 year ago
RE: 0:20 - The discovery of the gene and the double helix happened a century apart. The gene was discovered by Gregor Mendel in his experiments with pea plants in the 1850's and 1860's by his observation of the mathematical rule of 3:1 (1/4) expression of phenotypes when crossbreeding the pea plants which are otherwise self-pollinating. It makes perfect sense a mathematician would be employed in this field in the 1920s as all conclusions to this point were drawn mathematically based on ratio.
GimpSuit99 1 year ago
What ABOOUT CIRCUMCISION WATT!!?
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch he's smarter than to waste his time on such a bullshit, baseless argument. you just don't learn, do you? that your argument is completely irrelevant to anything important in taking back OUR FREEDOMS AND FREE MINDS.... go ahead and respond, like always, with your crazy rants about how you think you are so in the know... again, I won't read it or respond to it. (straight to the trash) hopefully though, you will eventually learn to spend your time advocating for something that matters.
theblackmanOyeah 1 year ago
@theblackmanOyeah bahaha. you think you are so superior you know better than millions of years of evolution. Please do read this, and tell me, did your doctor know better than millions of years of evolution when he cut your foreskin off? I think not. He was most likely like any other Western man - a masturbator that thinks life is the way it is because that's the way it seems, without a notion of what a higher state of mind means or feels like because he ejaculated so much he damaged his bod
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch People been whackin it for a long time, but people weren't putting dangerous chemicals in the food air and water supply for a long time.
thecoolerstinger 1 year ago
@thecoolerstinger Ok, BUT, the forces of evil in modern society are PROMOTING circumcision, something unheard of in ancient times or in the middle ages.
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch I agree, but look at the whole of what they are doing. Monsanto has gone completely Nazi, they are growing GMO corn with pesticides in it that is poisoning the lakes and streams out west with Bt toxin. They are modifying salmon and the FDA won't label it as GMO modified. They are feeding livestock with this GMO garbage. And then they are sending SWAT teams to farmers markets and small farms of people who want to grow their own food. Chemicals in everything man.
thecoolerstinger 1 year ago
@thecoolerstinger I meant to say promoting masturbation AND circumcision in my last post. I understand your concerns over the food. I too am very worried. I drink distilled water in glass containers and eat organic vegetarian and dairy foods. Nevertheless, a secret about not ejaculating your life energy away is that this life energy over time will be transferred to the different parts of your body and even inside your bones, to fortify your body. This is an excellent way to defeat chemicals
gingowitch 1 year ago
@gingowitch LOL
thecoolerstinger 1 year ago
The problem is that people are so ignorant there not going to believe something off of youtube. They rather believe the news,media,etc
FIGHT THE POWER!!!
K20civicsirturbo 1 year ago
Well, he's right about the tennis match thing.
mariagianna624 1 year ago
Eugenics is a lesser evil than dysgenics. There is no status quo. Either there is some kind of selection pressure which favours positive traits (health, intelligence, good nature) or you end up with decay and degeneration. It's a simple fact of nature.
gazz12345a 1 year ago
I choose freedom.. freedom of mind and body..
and I'm ready to die for it..
vegatron77 1 year ago 21
truth = libertypoet
website
campaign4liberty 1 year ago
Alan Watt is a fantastic speaker and very knowledgeable on history who did what to who and why. He is very observant in the happenings today and who are doing it to the people and why. We are being dumb down intentionally by the schools and mainstream media. Less people means more for the Insiders.
starlight1946 1 year ago
Ah Yes, Soros Whores out in force today! Throw'em a dollar, maybe they'll go back to standin on the streetcorner.. LOL!
talltommy46 1 year ago
get ready to die.
benebeer 1 year ago
This is very intelligent. It's been written about before. The big question is: Where do we go? Or..what do we do about it? Seriously. If that group is that powerful what hope is there for individuals to change a thing. Like the cows waiting in line at a slaugtherhouse.
1Atomtan 1 year ago
What bothers me is the view counts on these videos. Really? Only 3 thousand? I can only hope YouTube is manipulating the count to appear lower than it actually is. If not, we are in sad shape.
crazy650c 1 year ago
@crazy650c People are sheep. They go about their daily lives believing that this isn't going on. In trouble indeed
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
truth
libertypoet
website
legalizeliberty 1 year ago
Grab your pitchforks!
jmurrayrocks 1 year ago
@jmurrayrocks, Nice thought with one drawback...
Every time someone 'takes out' the 'controller', a thousand others step in their place. One example that comes to mind is Pablo Escobar.
Really no solution to this that I can think of, It's just the nature of man.
MikePresents2 1 year ago
Please everybody read "the gods of Eden" by William Bramley. It explains that this manipulation has been going on our entire hystory in a similarly clear manner as mr Allen Watt does.
CamoKhan2000 1 year ago
The Soters used to do that stuff long time ago. Common tradition among Greek-Macedonians.
shockolanu 1 year ago
@jaguarclaw
Sure it is. But there is no need to paint us off as the scum of the Earth. Alex Jones seems to dislike scientists, he dislikes geneticists, climatologists, immunologists, etc.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
I went to your schools, I read your essays, I've been through your system, I got grades like a good little slave... and then I woke up. Have you ever watched Alex Jones explain why, regardless of course or faculty, they will ask first-year university students to play a game of life-boat? First trimester in school I too was asked to play life-boat; it was at an Introductory English course (?!) I know from personal experience that he is telling the truth about eugenics brainwashing.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You said you read essays. You took a semester-long Social Studies of Science. I studied Biomedical Sciences, i was not taught eugenics were good. No offense, but how does your semester-long experience hold up against over 5 years genetics?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I was responding to your condescending suggestion that I haven't read up on the issue and need a history lesson. The only scientists I know who study something in order to debunk it are atheists doing comparative religion. Everyone else is going to vow by the legitimacy of their field, so I'm not surprised you are respoding the way you do, insisting against all evidence that contemporary genetics is good and noble, and that eugenics was just a black page out of history.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Are we going to turn this into a straw-man argument were you attack me for being an atheist? For the record, i never attempt to use science to debunk the idea of a God. God is unfalsifiable and i have no need to take people's comfort in a God-figure. However we can debunk books like the Quran and the Bible, showing people to use their own mind instead of taking the word of 2000-year old goat herders, and that's all I hope to achieve with atheism. Skepticism.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH What are you talking about? I am a totally godless atheist myself. You're the one who is biased here, thinking that only religious people want to argue the merits of science with you.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux "The only scientists I know who study something in order to debunk it are atheists doing comparative religion." Than you don't know a lot of scientists. Because the fundamentals of science are that any scientific theory needs to provide evidence and be falsifiable. People studied Lamarckian evolution to prove it wrong. Even Hawkin's theory of black holes losing information was disproved. Trying to debunk is an essential part of any scientific process.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH There is a difference between studying Marx to prove his economic theories wrong, and studying economics itself to prove economics itself wrong. No one is going to study genetics (ie contemporary eugenics) to prove that genetics (ie eugenics) itself is wrong. Read a bit of Bourdieu if you don't understand this argument.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Genetics does not equal eugenics. As i have demonstrated earlier, it's perfectly possible to believe in natural selection and not start selecting yourself. Every time scientists cure someone of a disease, every time you take your hay-fever-pills we are violating natural selection because we are not selecting people for their resistance to an illness, but curing them all, so they can all reproduce and pass on their genes. No problem. Perfectly possible.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Genetics is the study of genes, heredity and variation in the field of Biology. How can you proof an area of studies wrong? That's like proving math wrong. It makes no sense. You can disprove a mathematical equation or theory, but you can't disprove mathematics. It's just a field of study.
Eugenics on the other hand is "cience of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics". Big difference.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
If science never attempted to debunk a theory we would still think the Sun revolved around the Earth.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH And the fact that the overwhelming majority of people on this planet are still unaware of that fact should tell you something about the impact of that insight on their lives. That's how all science functions under the NWO: you scientists discover something only to keep the overwhelming majority of the population from knowing about it.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
What? No we don't. We're lucky if even half of the morons out there understand a jack about it. Take global warming. So many people are claiming it's all a myth, when most of them couldn't even foretell the weather if they got a map of pressure-zones. Yet they act as if they are climatologists with years of experience. We can't help that. Ideas are out there, we can't help it if you can't comprehend them or they don't fit your agenda or technophobia.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
May i ask for an example of one of the things we supposedly hold back, as evil scientists?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ever followed the 'open access publishing' debate? How about reading the 'Berlin Declaration'? Ever accessed the 'arxiv' website? Those all prove that you scientists are hoarding research information that is more often than not funded by the tax paying public that cannot see it yet is affected by it.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Yes, it's called copyright. A system with which I do not agree, but it's there. You're tax money also funds movies that you may not distribute, doesn't it?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ha, not anymore! We just got ourselves a Christo-fascist-libertarian government here in the Netherlands, which said it will get rid of all art subsidies (not of science subsidies, of course, they still need to pay the Ab Osterhauses of this world tax-payer money to produce the NWO soft-kill weapons)
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Christo-facist-libertarian? Ok then what kind of government would you like? µ
Yes, because science subsidies are only used to develop weapons? Where does the money that funds our lab come from, then?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Big Pharma, of course! Everyone knows that now!
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Yes, that would be smart if we didn't spent years of our time and millions to find treatments that actually work and created vaccines. Vaccines are a lot cheaper then cures, so wouldn't it be more convenient to just let children get polio and then sell them life-long supplies of medicine? And again, how does this fit in with eugenics?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "And again, how does this fit in with eugenics?" Well, you've just answered it yourself: "Vaccines are a lot cheaper then cures". You people do what's cheap, not what's right. If culling is cheap, you'll take care of that too.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
By they way, no one is stopping you from actually buying a scientific review once in a while. I could give you some recommendations, or even a magazine like Scientific American has it's charms. But don't blame scientists for being restricted by copyright-laws. We don't decide whether or not our articles get published freely, the reviews, universities and funders do that. But I don't agree, personally I believe, if there was no copyright, this would boost scientific progress.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Ever read the actual research versus the press release for the mass media? I have! And if you actually followed the open access publishing debate, you should now that they are not restricted by copyrights as you claim, they themselves opted not to start arxiv journals. They were free to, they just didn't *want* to. For obvious reasons (deliberate hoarding).
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You want to be able to see articles, but when you do you say you don't need to see them because they are manipulated? Then just stop whining. Either you buy the reviews, which contain exactly the same articles as those you would pay online for, or you don't. What we hope to accomplish with hoarding? Amuse me.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You're twisting my words. I said that press releases have almost nothing to do with the actual research, if you can get ahold of it and read it for yourself. You are asking me to read digests/press-releases, I am saying such digests are used an excuse not to provide access to the actual research. As for what you have to gain from hoarding, ask your Big Pharma financiers, I'm sure they'll gladly spell it out for you.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Every single drug ever created, every pill you take is weakening the gene pool, because it gives you the advantage to survive with your particular illness and still reproduce and pass those genes on. Your offspring will get the same pills. However, no scientist in his right mind will claim that we should stop treating people because of this or he/she will probably be discredited by the great majority. Every cure or treatment ever developed is contradictory to eugenics.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH You've just figured out why a lot of us listen to Alex Jones: because he interviews the doctors who do exactly that. Look up his interviews with Dr Sherry Tenpenny. The reason why I might need to take these drugs you speak of is because the NMO has poluted the environment so much (chemtrails etc) that it has lowered my natural immunity to fight off disease. Or will you insist that environmental polution is a conspiracy theory too?
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
So you think your body couldn't get cancer if not for chemicals?
Oh no, the vaccine story... How many people actually died of the vaccine? How many died of the flue? Take your choice. By the way, this again, has nothing to do with eugenics does it? I never worked on this vaccine, never got it myself but i'll admit it reeks like someone didn't do their job right. However, this is one vaccine out of a thousand (polio, hepatitis B, A, rubella, tetanus, TBC, etc
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Not, that's not what I am saying, I am saying that should I ever get cancer, my body will not be able to fight it because polution by the NWO will have destroyed my natural defense mechanisms. However, if get cancer, it IS most likely because of all the NWO polution, as the overwhelming majority of cancers are environmental. I haven't even gone into vaccines. You brought up that issue.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Yes, but of all environmental cause of cancer, you control most. Diet, smoking, drugs, alcohol, etc. Pollution certainly doesn't do it any good, but you can live healthy.
Then why are we, scientists, currently working on ways to teach your immune system to attack cancer, if we are out to kill you?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH What are you talking about? What treatment is teaching cancer patients'immune suppressed bodies to fight cancer? Cancer patients in 2010 are receiving the exact same treatment my grandfather did in the mid 1980s: chemical poisoning and/or radiation. The treatment hasn't changed in 25 years.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Your body isn't immune suppressed. I told you "testing", as in not common use yet. Go to Google scholar and search ffs. Oh right, you think that's manipulated. Then you obviously have never heard of monoclonal antibodies, herceptine, imatinib, RNAi, gene therapy, anti-angiogenics, etc. We also work on early detection by searching for markers and making techniques like micro arrays cheaper.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "cheaper" for whom? David de Rothschild? The Queen of England? "Cheap" for them is still astronomically unaffordable to the rest of us "worthless eaters"!
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Euhm, if you could think coherently for a few seconds... Cheaper for the people who have to purchase it maybe? Vaccines unaffordable? Are you telling me you live in a Western country with healthcare and can't afford a vaccin? But you'd rather see your child taking medication and being oxygen-sustained for the rest of his/her life? Don't bullshit me.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I pay 12X90 euros a year on semi-privatized semi-socialized healthcare, because health-insurance is mandatory and the Dutch government can seize your bank-account and fine you if you don't voluntairily sign up. I'm not bulls*ing you. If I get *one* vaccination, I have to pay an extra 165 euros on top of all that other money, because I dared make use of the health-care system, and the 165 fee is punishment for doing so. As you can imagine, I don't want your vaccines.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
How is cure "righter" than a vaccine? Ever heard of the proverb "better to prevent than recover"?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I have! Have the NWO, who are deliberately poluting the world, causing everyone to have suppressed immune systems? The same peoeple who gave us nuclear bombs in the name of advanced science are lecturing us about "prevention is better than the cure"? Don't make me laugh. "Prevention is better than the cure" so let's prevent people from existing. That's eugenics!
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Nuclear bombs? What does that have to do with vaccines? Prevent which people from existing? What are you talking about? Are you still sane in the head?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You go tell people on the street you feel they should no longer get vaccinated and rather get ill, pay tuns for treatment and take the risk of dying. Let's see how much people will appreciate that. People who oppose vaccination are more eugenicists that any of the things you blame scientists of. When given the ability to prevent, you feel people should just get sick and whoever is the strongest should survive. How do you call that?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
The creator of Gardasil *herself*, admitted the vaccine did more harm than good.
And, anyways, you don't need to be a genious to go and read the studies about the incredible autoimmune reactions caused by lipidic molecules used as adjuvants in these new generation vaccines.
Regardless, HPV is one more Holywood-like made up monster. The incidence rate is incredibly low, compared to all the ridiculous hype about it, and Pap screenings are just enough, in most cases.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
Even if every women got screened every 3 years as recommended and by some magic we never saw a pap-smear beyond CIN II about 22% of those will progress into invasive cancer. Not everyone get's screened though, not even within an effective timespan. If this was the case we would never see CIN II or CIN III pap-smears.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
And yes, cancer is an horrible condition, and that is why people should beware of vaccines; since vaccine solutions for most vaccines are filled with carcinogenic substances, from all the residual RNA/DNA coming from the celular tissues where vaccine is grown.
Sadly, people only tend to know about Salk's issue with the SV40 and other simian viruses. Unfortunately most vaccine preparations are teeming with carcinogens.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
There is little residual DNA/RNA in vaccines when properly prepared, not to mention these strands are lysated. Fragments of DNA/RNA can't do any damage in the aren't inserted into cells with the accompanying viral/bacterial proteins. If transfecting cells was that easy, we wouldn't have to spend more time perfecting actual carriers and transfectors than actually developing gene therapies.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
Multiple mechanisms such as ADAR's deal with free genomic material in the cell. When you don't inject any integrase with full strands or ADAR-inhibitors the risk of developing a tumor from the small amount of fragmented genome that remains in a vaccine is abysmal.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
Since when does prevalation mean we shouldn't allow a vaccine? This is an actual cancer we can prevent. Do you know what a hell cancer is to cure when metastased? Cancer cells are specifically selected in your body to not undergo apoptosis, to avoid their own death at any cost. The incidence of Merkel cell cancer is abysmal, but so is the prognosis (look it up, it's horrible). This is a cancer could possibly vaccinate for. You want to deny people that because of incidence?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
Comment removed
LibertyTruthJustice 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH
I mentioned prevalence only in reference to the comparative sensacionalism that is promoted by governments and big pharma on what regards HPV. It isn't that widespread and it isn't that dangerous. But it shows how propaganda machines can create virtual monsters out of thin air.
Anyway, I wouldn't be against an HPV vaccine if it had any assurance of quality or safety. And that just isn't the case with Gardasil and Cervarix, as the creator of Gardasil herself later came to admit.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
Gardasil and cervarix can, like any vaccine, evoke an over-elaborate immune response in some people, but so can any drug. You don't know that kind of stuff in advance.No drug is safe for everyone to use, but i can assure you quality checks are being done to the vaccines and drugs that leave and it doesn't take much for them to be revoked or at least publicly discredited.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
I am aware of the stories surrounding Gardasil, as there are stories for Cervarix, HBV vaccines, polio vaccines, rubella vaccines, tetanus-shots, HBA vaccines, and virtually ever other vaccine ever developed. All vaccines that have undoubtedly saved countless lives and contrary to conspiracy theorists and religious nuts showed no correlation with any of the adverse effects claims in actual peer-reviewed articles.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
If you are not feeling well after the first shot of a vaccine, you don't have to take the second and third (and sometimes fourth) by the way, just like it says on every PIL of every drug to immediately stop taking the drugs at any sign of discomfort other than the expected effects (such as fatigue mostly) and contact your physician to ask for further advice. Why would we do this if we we're trying to poison people?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@LibertyTruthJustice
And i don't know where you get the idea that a virus which at least 80% of females will have encountered before the age of 50 has a low prevalence.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Do you know what the cervical cancer vaccine costs? Gardasil or Cervarix? Doesn't even matter, most western countries provided it for free. Do you know what the, prevalence and 5-year survival rate of cervical cancer are? More so, do you know what cancer-treatments costs? So it very obscure as to why you would prefer to get cervical cancer and pay 10000's of euro's for treatment, and maybe die nonetheless, when you have the option of getting a relatively cheap vaccine.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH "why you would prefer to get cervical cancer". HPV is a sexually transmitted disease. Are you suggesting/fantasizing I'm having unsafe sex? And then you woke up, sir! Let me remind everyone of that ridiculous excuse "Boys need the HPV vaccine too, cos they will have oral sex" you technocrats came up with to jab little boys as well. As for the costs, a professor at my university wrote a whole article about the HPV vaccine and how it was a total waste of money.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Wrong. First of all HPV is not a disease itself, it's a family of virii. It can be transferred by any physical contact, mucosal membranes or even by touching mutual objects. Pathology isn't really your thing, that's clear by now. HPV-16 and HPV-18 can cause cervical cancer if they integrate in the cervical epithelial layer, ow they got there can be by a variety of circumstances.
Which university? More importantly, how many people even peer-reviewed the article?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH " Pathology isn't really your thing, that's clear by now." Suuure, sure, and that's cos I've only read fluffy conspiracy theory texts on HPV, such as Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Laura A. Koutsky, Kathleen L. Stine, et al., "Genital Human Papillomavirus in Women Who Have Sex With Women", Journal of Infectious Disease Diseases, vol. 178, 1604-09, 1998. Clearly I'm uniformed and don't know what the hell I'm on about :-D
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You read 2 peer-reviewed articles and you think you are an expert on HPV, vaccination and immunology? You called HPV a disease that could only be transferred sexually and be prevented by using a condom. So yes, you are not really what i would call educated on the subject of HPV and resulting cancers.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Let's see, you chide Youtube users telling them: "Do you expect me to educate you on the subject over a YT video thread", yet you expect ME to post my full reading-list over a YT thread? I just gave you one example of the kind of research I've been reading. Clearly you don't get the hint.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You didn't read to well if you think HPV is only transmitted sexually and can be prevented by using a condom.
Again, what eugenics? Every cure, vaccine, treatment ever devised by scientists is a direct willing violation of natural selection.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH The point is that you are accusing us of being uninformed, refusing to consult mainstream sources, only bothering with conspiracy theories. I have shown you that, where we *can* (I've demonstrated that you scientists hoard information), we have already consulted mainstream sources, and have reached our own conclusions, which are not the conclusions the mainstream wants us to reach. My conclusion is that the NWO eugenics agenda conspiracy theory has a whole lot of merit to it.
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Vaccinating everyone with Gardasil or Cervarix would be too expensive. So if we eradicate the virus in females, there is no need to do so in men who have oral sex, since the females can no longer infect the males. The males can't transfer the virus to vaccinated females if they have it, so the virus slowly runs out of carriers. With the exception of homosexual men perhaps because this is man-man transfer, homosexuals can go get a vaccine if they want to.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Safe sex does not protect you entirely from HPV. Numerous studies have been done on this subject and if you really have as much knowledge on the subject of genetics as you claim you do, you'd know this.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Natural defense mechanism? Hate to break it to you, but ever heard of polio, small pox etc? Disease your immune system couldn't do anything about. Science fixed that. Thanks to scientists, polio and smallpox are now eradicated. Again, no eugenics to be found, i'm still waiting for someone to tell me how this links up to Alan Watt's incoherent eugenics-ramblings.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Thanks to scientists they were put into a petridish and converted into bioweapons, that the NWO can hold over our heads like a Damoclean sword and threaten us with: "Submit to the global slave-grid, do as we say, or Al Qaida (NWO itself) will release the bioweapon plague".
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
"Submit to the global slave-grid, do as we say, or Al Qaida (NWO itself) will release the bioweapon plague" I didn't get that message, when did they supposedly say this?
You've got it bad, don't you?
You would understand jack of actual raw scientific data, and you know that as well as I do. People can't even understand stuff like global warming when you put it into a documentary and you expect those morons to be able to process raw scientific data?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Great, let's follow your arrogant logic: if we "worthless eaters" are all morons who can't read scientific data, why not just put it all out there? According to you, we are all too dumb to read it anyway. So what's to fear?
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
It's not my fear. The only thing publishers do before we bring in an article is make it understandable. If the person who did that research reads his own article in a review and it's altered in anyway all hell will brake loose, trusts me, professors and doctors can be pretty confectionist when it comes to their reviews.
I didn't say "you" (whoever you meant by that) are all worthless morons. But yes, many people are morons.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
You can't say all geneticists are bad because of one vaccine gone wrong. You don't say all doctors are bad because one screwed up, do you. And this whole thing still doesn't fit with your supposed "geneticists want eugenics"-theory.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@mariatechnosux
Eugenics was a black page in history. Stop acting as if the majority of scientists are out to destroy mankind. Science has created horrible things such as the atomic bomb but is has also tripled the life expectancy of average humans in 500 years from 25 to 75 years. I don't act as if Monsanto isn't evil as fuck, but stop acting as if scientist are trained to kill humans at the university.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH When you suppose a claim such as "Eugenics was a black page in history. Stop acting as if the majority of scientists are out to destroy mankind" you should have empirical evidence to back this claim or it is your own bigotry.To make this claim you would need objective evidence of the "majority of scientists" personal beliefs not what they publicly state.And there public support of "climate change" and collectivism/statism are contrary to your statements.
usernameted1 1 year ago
@usernameted1
Considering you are the conspiracy theorist, you should provide the evidence once in a while, from a source other than prisonplanetdotcom r conspiracydotorg etc. Pubicly state? When did scientists publicly state eugenics are good? You provide me with evidence of that.
Oh shit, it's a climate-change denier. May I ask what your degree in Climatology is? May I ask on what model you are basing your view? Which scientists do you work with?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I'm sorry ad-hominem attacks and redirecting the conversation are not arguments.You put forth that " the majority" of scientist do not share the eugenics ideology, therefore you have to provide empirical evidence.Correct me if I am wrong, but the whole ideology behind the "anthropogenic climate change" is that you can use FORCE / legislation/ regulation against human beings who are "causing""climate change".And that 3rd world countrys should not be aloud to develop industry.
usernameted1 1 year ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH Not letting 3rd world countries develop there own industrial base while the western countries expand there own is eugenics!.Once again if you put forth a hypothesis/theory it is up to you to provide EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE,you claim anthropogenic warming then you have to provide proof !! throwing around ad- hominems and parroted conclusions is a poor substitute for a methodology based on logic.If you support the use of force to stop "climate change" then by default u support euginics
usernameted1 1 year ago
@usernameted1
Call that whatever you like, but it has nothing to do with selecting better genes and I don't see how geneticists decide whether or not there should be industry in Africa.
Eugenics has nothing to do with climate change. Grab a dictionary.
Proof? Again, google scholar. Or buy a review. Or go read a book. Get some level of education before making general claims about global warming.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago