Minute Waltz (Waltz in D Flat Major) (Op. 64 No. 1) By Chopin Sheet Music

[XellosBlackforest]

Quite nice.. the critics - well,

1. they never know how to play any classical instrument,

2. they never touch / seen a piano.

3. I assume they won't know the difference between a harpsichord and a piano.

4. or the differences between baroque, classical and romantism.

YET they BELIEVE they know can play better.

Since you like to criticise, please allow me to criticise back back to you :D

[Rachmaninoffkid]

past 50 seconds just doesn’t do it for me. If somebody made a ten hour vid of this I’d die.

[oldepersonne]

very helpful for practice-i think many of the people listening to this dont understand what you intended this for, so their comments are irrelevant

[jrhythm98]

More cowbell

[rothschildianum]

the ugliest Minute Waltz that I have ever heard in my life....

[xplah]

Wow this sucks. Watch real people play it.

[JazzKeyboardist1]

thanks ,, i was looking for the sheet music,,,I always want to ask some of these critics,," am I supposed to apologize to you because I forced you to listen to this video" ? lol

[ikertznus]

HAHAHAHAH.

Imagine if chopin actually did that. xD

[308813062]

live performance is always better. the computer plays in a mechanical sound with absolutely no expression. i use Finale to write pieces, and it ticks me off when i play them to see how they sound so far - the computer plays completely different then what i hear in my head. but what program is this in? how are you able to write two parts on one staff?

[nuladog]

this is what I played for my recital when I was 12 years old... the machine is kind of off

[AMWALKER31]

Well it kept good timing! :)

[ChumRu]

0:49 pretty much sums up why I dont like "machines" playing music.

[hayama317]

@ChumRu well, would you rather have nothing playing at all? Because I would find that boring.

[JamesMichaelStClair]

@hayama317 You seem to imply that the choice is poorly realized MIDI or silence. But the reality is that I would rather hear a well thought out and interpreted performance; but if this were my only option, then I would absolutely rather hear nothing than this. Why listen to flat, emotionless music when performances done by gifted people are so easy to find?

[hayama317]

@JamesMichaelStClair What I do is meant to help people in THEIR studies of the songs. It's meant to have an outlet of hearing how the song is supposed to hear like, while following the sheet music. It helps people in playing their instruments, and is also a way to distribute sheet music. Many people have criticized what I do. However, in my opinion, what I do is very helpful. I have never meant for you to enjoy the music on my videos, it is simply a guideline.

[JamesMichaelStClair]

@hayama317 As a music educator I have to disagree that this would help anyone with their studies. While it is true that you will get some idea what the printed notes will look like, this is not all that music is. There is much more to music interpretation than simply picking out notes, and bad MIDI renders do not convey this in the slightest. Nor does this offer any insight into harmonic understanding or a concept of form; all it is is robotic hammering of tones. Not helpful at all.

[howtoplayitsa]

@hayama317 dude you just powned that guy xD

[Dunderhead36]

@hayama317 buddy, just play the regular song. Using a machine instead just seems lazy. Not saying you are lazy, nor do I claim your intention was lazy, but natural talent is much better.

[shenkeey]

@Dunderhead36 He didn't make this to listen to it, but to learn from it; and this version is machine-performed; so technically perfect

[Purelleslovexss]

@hayama317 hey PLEASE tell me all the flats and sharps in this peice, it says 4 flats but i cant figure out what it is! :(( please please please respond!! :((

[MinbioPSN]

@ChumRu I agree what you've said

[M8T12B93]

shit version

[XaldBalghostriped]

THNX!!!