that aasnt the 2012 gtr. 0-60 in 3.5 the 2012 does it in 2.8 it would have probley won if that was the case. still 2 amazing cars and that LFA sounds like an orgasm from god
On another note, Looking at the styling of the GT-R, It is the facelifted newer model which does 0-60 in 2.9 seconds w/ launch. That's .6 seconds faster than the time recorded in this drag race, which would have made a difference on the outcome. This begs the question as to why MotorTrend decided to run this race as they did, as it does not reflect the true performance of the two cars in question accurately.
There is a problem with this race. "The Nissan hits 60 in just 3.5 seconds". But it is well known that the GT-R does 0-60 in 3.2 (old version) and 2.9 (new version) utilizing its launch control. Thus, this drag race doesn't really test the GT-R using everything it's got.
Regarding the LFA, It runs 0-60 in 3.6 seconds with launch control, so one must conclude that This race was done most likely without launch control, and without drivers competent enough to fully utilize their respective cars.
Now take the GT-R Alpha 9 and do this test again and then lets see who wins :P hahaha Well I love both cars. LFA pretty pricey but still an amazing piece.
Now Nissan go invest 400k into a GTR n let's see what happens. Lol. Nah... The LFA is expensive, not because its performance, but because of its engineering step. It's something for the future.
@lReziqn F1 = more than 4 Million Dollars = 800hp, you can have a GTR with a lot of more hp with not much money. Where's the purpose of your analogy. You're comparing a state of art machine with a farm pseudo-engineering?
@fragosomusic When you buy a LFA you're paying, engineering, research and a lot of stuff that you dont pay in GTR. R35 is a great machine but its other category.
LFA is Exotic, GTR isnt.
If you want to compare with GTR, put a BMW M5 or a C63 AMG, or something like that.
why race the the 2012 LFA against the 2010 GTR? the 2012 GTR ran 11.2 (six tenths of a second faster than the 2012 LFA) against the zo6 and the shelby gt500 in the other Motor Trend video...
@mowglie607 Well it was not a prototype but maybe thats it. But, the lfa is not suppose to be THE fastest car, its designed to deliver all the best driving thrills and it does!! It is a wonderful car one of my favourite i have massive respect for toyota.
i used to hate that LF-A for it's price tag n i loved the GTR over it, but after some research and readings i figured out that the LF-A is DAMN GREAT CAR !
If thats all an extra 315,000 big ones gives you, i wouldnt bother. In fact, i wouldnt bother with either of these, id buy a proper car. A Lamborghini Aventador :)
To compare two supercars like this is ridicolous and pointless. The real sense of it, al the fine tuning of chassis, suspensions brake systems aerodynamics is all about making the lap time on a demanding track. If you just want to win a drag race, purchase a used V6, turbocharge it to the extreme, trow out everything which gives real value to a car (its electronics, any confort, forget about build quality), fit everything an a rod and go...
@yoshyoka So you buy a supercar to look good in it. That's perfectly fine, whatever floats your boat. But to say comparing comparable things is pointless is simplistic and unrealistic. You think the Bugatti engineers DIDN'T know they were building the "fastest" supercar on the road? As long as Lexus builds a "supercar", it will be judged and compared to other supercars. Paying 400k for something that can be matched by a 85k "comfortable" daily driver is (pick your analogy).
@iambiggus You missed my point. I don't care to look good in it. What I state is that a supercar comparison should also comprehend a time race on a track which test all the qualities of a car: dynamic behaviour, stability, handling, braking. Than they should also be compared on the streets and see how the suspensions hadle it. In real life, the dest super car is the one which takes you from A to B in the least amount of time, and unless you live in a desert it is not a straight line.
Caddy CTS-V 1hp=$116. Vette ZR1 = $157. GTR=$160. LFA= $679(!). All of these cars post comparable #'s, all do </= to 4s 0-60's, all do </= 11s 1/4 miles, one costs 400k, the rest less than 100k. I think the reason people (including myself) gripe on the LFA is it's ridiculous cost/performance. 10 years of R & D and 400k later you can beat one with a Vette, keep up with a GTR, and peg one with a Caddy. If you buy one to be exclusive you're not a car guy, you're form over function.
@iambiggus: Thats because the Lexus LFA is a Supercar. Supercar's performance is not built to a price point. Overall build quality, high quality materials all around inside and out, research, design and performance is what supercars are all about. The Nissan GTR, ZR1, and the CTSV are all great great cars. But the LFA is well worth its price tag.
@V8Supercar1 In my opinion a supercar should be just that, super. Lexus did an unbelievable job creating it's LFA and I won't argue that, but to have all other criteria met other than performance is again, in my opinion, mind boggling and not worth the $400k price tag. Do I still want one? Of course. I can dream AND play the lotto.
@Billboard2001 Wrong, it's called personal preference. An opinion which you may have difficulty understanding thus and resorting to trolling when others do not share your idea, so fan boy or buster? I prefer fan boy.
You have to admit the LFA is sick. GT-R is also sick but LFA is just a bit more with look and engine. And idk why people flip about the price it compares to ferrari and its made by the luxury side of toyota, lexus. the gt-r is not luxury its actual nissan not infinity. See the difference. overall just as a GT-R is awesome the LFA is sick cuz off it's look
Yeah Nissan GTR all day. Until Toyota decides to step their game up, I cannot take them seriously. Every Toyota on the road automatically reminds me of a 90's Avalon. Simple as that.
@dominicflores2010 you are right, if you look at the other video the gtr vs z06 vs 500gt the gtr runs 11.2 on this one it's running 11.9 .... I call bs
for 330k more it better beat a gtr by more that a half a car lenght, by the way that was a first gen gtr, i dont think it would beat the new gtr if it only beat the old one by such a small margin. 400k fail, you might as well buy a 458 and a aventador for all that money
@obliqr this car was not meant to be a "you get 500x more than what you pay for" This car was made to be a rare exclusive exotic. only 400 will be made.
This car was made to be rare and exclusive, not bang for buck. Sure the gtr is fast.. But this car is more rare. Lexus didnt want the lfa to be a tuner car that street racers put stickers and turbos on getting in street races. Its in the class of enzos etc. rare and super expensive not bang for buck. People want bang for buck, buy a muscle car and drop a motor and you can run 10s. You want a track car grt a gtr. U want to look like the coolest richest guy on the block, get an lfa
@CJAEY The problem is that the kind of person that would buy a GTR would never buy a LFA and vice versa. A GTR owner wants to drive and an LFA owner wants to show off. Toyota really hasn't made anything in the real realm of sports cars for awhile. The bland uninteresting designs and lack of performance inovation has hurt the pre 1997 Toyota fan base and now 400k later, really?? But I would buy the GTR even if I did have the money for a LFA. Tell the truth I'd buy 4 and get better resale value.
@CJAEY what are you babbling about? The GTR was NOT built to be "the fastest production car out there" (whatever that means) Fastest 1/4 mile? Fastest 1/8 mile? Fastest top speed? I can think of a few production cars that Rival the GTR's times. Ever heard of a the new 5.4 Supercharged mustang? Or maybe the new 6.2 liter corvette, camaro and cadillac CTS-v (all of which have superchargers)? Each one of these cars costs around $50k (maybe 60k at most) and all hit 11 seconds in the 1/4 mile
Yeah bring the supra back! But honestly I don't think a 1/4 mile drag means crap, the GT-R can turn way harder then the LFA, but honestly it's down to peoples preferences
I would just get the gt-r. An all wheel drive car is hard to beat off the line stock. Horse power is nothing if you can't put it to the ground. Any real racer knows that.
Nearly 100k for a high 11 second 1/4 mile car...pass. And 400k for one that's only a hair faster? For 20k you can build a car that's easily a low 11 second/high 10 second car. Crazy prices.
@usnsailor20 Anyone can do that if you have the money, but the LFA isn't market towards that type of demographic. It's market towards the rich with a taste for supercars. They are both great cars I would love to have both of them, but if you were to give me a choice between the LFA or the GTR? I'd take the LFA. That's just me though. To each to their own.
I like both cars, but when you can get the GTR for under 100k and then put the stage 1 kit on it bumping it up to 700hp, spend another 300K on the LFA
@scfog90 how said already CJAEY, and others adequate people - it's absolutely incorrect to compare those two cars.. Will you compare Ferrari 599 and Supra? Of cource fucking not!!! Will you compare Bentley Continental and Ford gt????? fucking no! LFA and GT-R is two amazing, but absolutely different things! Gt-r was made originally for fastest cornering, it's fast, it's reliable, it has 4 seats and boot, it's even expensive - stunning sports car! LFA - unique status-showing supercar
@scfog90 if you like - gtr was made to be great pal for burn-out, drag racing and cornering, it's an RACING icon. LFA it's not a racing car. It's just Lexus/Toyota attempt to make something iconic and nominal, like "Japan Aston Martin" or, I don't know, "Asian Ferrari", whatever. However, price could be 100k less, I think, but)
Toyota really needs to bring back the Supra (and not change the styling too much, it's perfect as is). Imagine being able to own a NEW one instead of having to shop around for one with low miles (rare feat) and one that hasn't been abused? There's sellers that sell them with 76k-90k miles for $25,000. Shoot, if a new one was available to get through a car loan but with no miles then I would totally take on the debt. Sweet performance sports car!!
as much as a fanatic of toyota I am. I would still buy a gtr and upgrade it. However give me that engine in the LFA and put it in a FT86 or AE86 man i can see fun. SOOOO how much for the Engine? lmao
The Lexus looks more a Nissan then the Nissan. When you're spending that kind of money, the style should be MUCH more "supercar like". Of course, with the top Supercars (Bugatti and Aston One-77) costing $1million+++, the Lexus is more like "entry level" (LOL) Supercar...
Makes sense...but in their ultimate drag race video they had 11 cars including these two and the GTR shit all over everything. The nissan driver in this one sucks, proven
The biggest thing people need to realize is that you more than likely get more pussy when you roll up in a LFA than if you roll up in a GTR....THE END.
ok this was one test... the 1/4 mile. I'm sure Toyota doesn't expect people to pay 400k for 1/4 mile times. I mean an ugly ass foxbody with 20k dumped in it would beat that. But that's not the point of this car. But I have a volvo so what do I know.
Jap cars are an embarrassment , you should be ashamed to own an asian car
BlackTintedWindows 53 minutes ago
that aasnt the 2012 gtr. 0-60 in 3.5 the 2012 does it in 2.8 it would have probley won if that was the case. still 2 amazing cars and that LFA sounds like an orgasm from god
XXZsparkie 3 hours ago
mantap
telo628 9 hours ago
lol, watch as the spoiler waves goodbye to the gtr!
1978JeepJ10 13 hours ago
and a 10k motorbike will still smoke both of them in the 1/4
fatdrood 16 hours ago
You massive boring twat!
popdog200 20 hours ago
On another note, Looking at the styling of the GT-R, It is the facelifted newer model which does 0-60 in 2.9 seconds w/ launch. That's .6 seconds faster than the time recorded in this drag race, which would have made a difference on the outcome. This begs the question as to why MotorTrend decided to run this race as they did, as it does not reflect the true performance of the two cars in question accurately.
Yeomanv10 21 hours ago
There is a problem with this race. "The Nissan hits 60 in just 3.5 seconds". But it is well known that the GT-R does 0-60 in 3.2 (old version) and 2.9 (new version) utilizing its launch control. Thus, this drag race doesn't really test the GT-R using everything it's got.
Regarding the LFA, It runs 0-60 in 3.6 seconds with launch control, so one must conclude that This race was done most likely without launch control, and without drivers competent enough to fully utilize their respective cars.
Yeomanv10 21 hours ago
LFA 400.000
GTR 54.000-120.000
difference only the money
402darthvader402 1 day ago
The LFA is worth 400k cuz it has a state of the art rice cooker in it
mrkomonkey 1 day ago
how come it couldnt be called "the toyota supra" come on toyota stop giving lexus all the good cars
DonAfgSher 1 day ago
bugatti veyron
alextex27 1 day ago
Porsche gt3 rs + SlS Amg = this cars cost.... lol, no thanks bro. oh the irony......
Howie262 1 day ago
get a alpha 9 gtr and re-race haha
ultaMMA 2 days ago
@ultaMMA don't need the alpha 9... the new 2012 gtr will do the trick
19danflo 1 day ago
I'd say a pretty poor showing by the LFA considering it is 4.5 times more expensive.....and hideous, the front looks like a fish.
MrFlesh 2 days ago
they pretty much made it a new age supra and charged 400k and stuck carbon fiber all over it
TheLiveAndLetRide 2 days ago
If I was a millionaire I would pay 399,999.99 for the sound of the car alone (Still love ya GTR)
N3KROSHAD3 2 days ago 2
Now take the GT-R Alpha 9 and do this test again and then lets see who wins :P hahaha Well I love both cars. LFA pretty pricey but still an amazing piece.
chikmaginet95 2 days ago
Comment removed
bo2oservice 3 days ago
Now Nissan go invest 400k into a GTR n let's see what happens. Lol. Nah... The LFA is expensive, not because its performance, but because of its engineering step. It's something for the future.
Aureious 3 days ago 13
The 400k is for all the extra nonsense they do besides actually making the car.
blaknite1 3 days ago
400k is way overprice for this thing.
blaknite1 3 days ago
spoiler up.. its legit.
simmons3506 3 days ago
The LFA has a very GTR-isque looking front and Gallardo looking back...
MonkeySharingan 3 days ago
shout out to the what looks like a white subaru in the backgroound at 3:46
TheeRascalss 4 days ago
hate the lfa's exhaust note. sounds so shitty and high pitched, and i normally like v10's
SuzukiRider93 4 days ago
552 HP and 400,000$ !!! Rip OFF
lReziqn 4 days ago
@lReziqn F1 = more than 4 Million Dollars = 800hp, you can have a GTR with a lot of more hp with not much money. Where's the purpose of your analogy. You're comparing a state of art machine with a farm pseudo-engineering?
fragosomusic 4 days ago
@fragosomusic When you buy a LFA you're paying, engineering, research and a lot of stuff that you dont pay in GTR. R35 is a great machine but its other category.
LFA is Exotic, GTR isnt.
If you want to compare with GTR, put a BMW M5 or a C63 AMG, or something like that.
fragosomusic 4 days ago
@lReziqn you are a retard
DethThrasher1 4 days ago
love gtrs but what a awesome noise the LFA makes gets me excited down there.
theupsthedowns 4 days ago
2012 gtr would shit on that thing
gabeherb345 4 days ago
Watch the Motor Trend video.
bishop2431 4 days ago
why race the the 2012 LFA against the 2010 GTR? the 2012 GTR ran 11.2 (six tenths of a second faster than the 2012 LFA) against the zo6 and the shelby gt500 in the other Motor Trend video...
mowglie607 4 days ago
@mowglie607 DUDE look at the description -2010- they say LFA 2012 but it got out in 2010
DUBARTIFY 4 days ago
@DUBARTIFY o i see, they just wanted to put this prototype car up against the gtr before it got too fast for it. waste of time to me.
mowglie607 4 days ago
@mowglie607 Well it was not a prototype but maybe thats it. But, the lfa is not suppose to be THE fastest car, its designed to deliver all the best driving thrills and it does!! It is a wonderful car one of my favourite i have massive respect for toyota.
DUBARTIFY 3 days ago
@DUBARTIFY it was a prototype when they tested it in the video, but i can see the point you're making.
mowglie607 3 days ago
The winner is more styles I like it
NOHJsoccer 4 days ago
LFA is in my town mall lol on exhibition
q7w7e7r7t7y7u7i7o7p 5 days ago
LFA doesnt worth 400k :(
kavinduerazor 5 days ago
It's different in every country.
11tjoen 5 days ago
2012 gtr owns
Solider134 5 days ago
If I had the money I would buy 10k F-150's each roughly (40k each)
SaiVihtooMyint 5 days ago
AND NOW ALL BACK LINE TO F12 BERLINETTA.
cicciointernazionale 5 days ago
if i had the money i wouldnt buy either of these..
urtfoodwater 6 days ago
ooh that LFA is juicy
DRUMMAGEEE 6 days ago
価格から考えればGT-Rの
パフォーマンスが高い事に
驚かされます＾＾
sarara4kisaragi 6 days ago
would've ben a better comparison if you used the '12 GT-R too really.
Rethgore 6 days ago
A super car? Not 10 second car????
BIGFIRMERIC 6 days ago
i used to hate that LF-A for it's price tag n i loved the GTR over it, but after some research and readings i figured out that the LF-A is DAMN GREAT CAR !
3yar1983 6 days ago
Imagine if the pedal got stuck in THIS Lexus!
kingdarius5252 6 days ago
Look at those 4 cylinder jap car ricers rev!
Supergungun 1 week ago
If thats all an extra 315,000 big ones gives you, i wouldnt bother. In fact, i wouldnt bother with either of these, id buy a proper car. A Lamborghini Aventador :)
aircooledwizard 1 week ago
To compare two supercars like this is ridicolous and pointless. The real sense of it, al the fine tuning of chassis, suspensions brake systems aerodynamics is all about making the lap time on a demanding track. If you just want to win a drag race, purchase a used V6, turbocharge it to the extreme, trow out everything which gives real value to a car (its electronics, any confort, forget about build quality), fit everything an a rod and go...
yoshyoka 1 week ago
@yoshyoka So you buy a supercar to look good in it. That's perfectly fine, whatever floats your boat. But to say comparing comparable things is pointless is simplistic and unrealistic. You think the Bugatti engineers DIDN'T know they were building the "fastest" supercar on the road? As long as Lexus builds a "supercar", it will be judged and compared to other supercars. Paying 400k for something that can be matched by a 85k "comfortable" daily driver is (pick your analogy).
iambiggus 6 days ago
@iambiggus You missed my point. I don't care to look good in it. What I state is that a supercar comparison should also comprehend a time race on a track which test all the qualities of a car: dynamic behaviour, stability, handling, braking. Than they should also be compared on the streets and see how the suspensions hadle it. In real life, the dest super car is the one which takes you from A to B in the least amount of time, and unless you live in a desert it is not a straight line.
yoshyoka 6 days ago
They LET the LFA win. THATS BULL SHIT.
iGoNzO123 1 week ago
@iGoNzO123
The LFA only won because this was the old GT-R (480 hp). There is a much quicker one out now with 530 hp and a 0-60 time of 2.9 seconds!
Reflection999 1 week ago
@Reflection999 Yeah i know that, now, thanks
iGoNzO123 6 days ago
Caddy CTS-V 1hp=$116. Vette ZR1 = $157. GTR=$160. LFA= $679(!). All of these cars post comparable #'s, all do </= to 4s 0-60's, all do </= 11s 1/4 miles, one costs 400k, the rest less than 100k. I think the reason people (including myself) gripe on the LFA is it's ridiculous cost/performance. 10 years of R & D and 400k later you can beat one with a Vette, keep up with a GTR, and peg one with a Caddy. If you buy one to be exclusive you're not a car guy, you're form over function.
iambiggus 1 week ago
@iambiggus: Thats because the Lexus LFA is a Supercar. Supercar's performance is not built to a price point. Overall build quality, high quality materials all around inside and out, research, design and performance is what supercars are all about. The Nissan GTR, ZR1, and the CTSV are all great great cars. But the LFA is well worth its price tag.
V8Supercar1 1 week ago 16
@V8Supercar1 In my opinion a supercar should be just that, super. Lexus did an unbelievable job creating it's LFA and I won't argue that, but to have all other criteria met other than performance is again, in my opinion, mind boggling and not worth the $400k price tag. Do I still want one? Of course. I can dream AND play the lotto.
iambiggus 6 days ago
You can keep both cars. I'll take an x-15 or a mig 25 foxbat any day.
Paulrebul 1 week ago
Both cars are great, but if I had my choice, I would rather take the Nissan. Still, I admit that the Lexus is a very good car too.
JonathanXDBlack 1 week ago
damn that LFA looks ugly
limpkit2011 1 week ago
Look at the world best drag race...
Apparently a car Called GT-R beat the hell out of the LFA
Kingshah007 1 week ago
LIKE PUSHING TWO TURDS DOWN A HILL TRING TO AVOID THE RUST PIECES FALLING OFF
markn1937 1 week ago
GTR any day. Any day.
ryl417 1 week ago
@ryl417 that's because you're an idiot all day. Every day.
Billboard2001 1 week ago
@Billboard2001 Wrong, it's called personal preference. An opinion which you may have difficulty understanding thus and resorting to trolling when others do not share your idea, so fan boy or buster? I prefer fan boy.
ryl417 1 week ago
People got to remeber its over a 1/4 mile, racing over a mile would be a better test.
Syncronizeification 1 week ago
Ill still take the GTR!
warscarz5541 1 week ago
You have to admit the LFA is sick. GT-R is also sick but LFA is just a bit more with look and engine. And idk why people flip about the price it compares to ferrari and its made by the luxury side of toyota, lexus. the gt-r is not luxury its actual nissan not infinity. See the difference. overall just as a GT-R is awesome the LFA is sick cuz off it's look
guitardude845 1 week ago
Yeah Nissan GTR all day. Until Toyota decides to step their game up, I cannot take them seriously. Every Toyota on the road automatically reminds me of a 90's Avalon. Simple as that.
MIKECORTI 1 week ago
so gtr loses by a tenth of a second. not bad considering its 310,000 dollars cheaper
TheShadowchild21 1 week ago
to be honest the gt-r would of one if it was a mile drag rice instead of the quater mile drag
pimpswagger100 1 week ago
LFA wins period! NEXT!
mizwa 1 week ago
GT-R is the best!
psylover1991 1 week ago
Gtr is nice and the lfa is expencive so i prefer to buy a car that is fast and made for tracks like a zr1 or zo6 or a porcha gt2
Alhameli95 1 week ago
stop all the camera changes.
TheZoelzer2 1 week ago
this is fake. it is totally rigged. the gtr obviously is the faster car and the driver backed off on it. you can tell in the video
dominicflores2010 1 week ago
@dominicflores2010 you are right, if you look at the other video the gtr vs z06 vs 500gt the gtr runs 11.2 on this one it's running 11.9 .... I call bs
wakabless 1 week ago
@wakabless this is the 2010 GTR not the 2012
obscuresword 1 week ago
@dominicflores2010 no it isn't
obscuresword 1 week ago
for 330k more it better beat a gtr by more that a half a car lenght, by the way that was a first gen gtr, i dont think it would beat the new gtr if it only beat the old one by such a small margin. 400k fail, you might as well buy a 458 and a aventador for all that money
obliqr 1 week ago
@obliqr this car was not meant to be a "you get 500x more than what you pay for" This car was made to be a rare exclusive exotic. only 400 will be made.
triggerhappybullets 1 week ago
This car was made to be rare and exclusive, not bang for buck. Sure the gtr is fast.. But this car is more rare. Lexus didnt want the lfa to be a tuner car that street racers put stickers and turbos on getting in street races. Its in the class of enzos etc. rare and super expensive not bang for buck. People want bang for buck, buy a muscle car and drop a motor and you can run 10s. You want a track car grt a gtr. U want to look like the coolest richest guy on the block, get an lfa
donisthabomb1 1 week ago
LFA looks like a pissed off Supra :D
joey66133 1 week ago
did anyone see the hood bouncing on the LFA,,,?
prescomp 1 week ago
i would get the lfa over a gtr anyday if i had the choice
schamaa11 1 week ago
$400K toyota blows
johnnylarue1 1 week ago
God, people are so fucking stupid, nothing but fanboy talk.
People purchase the LFA for exclusivity and it's a unique car. It was never built to be the fastest car out there.
Now the GTR was built to be the fastest production car out there and for under $90k.
You know what I always see in GTR videos? Theres always a bunch of 14 year olds saying "If I had the money, this that"... smh
CJAEY 1 week ago 43
@CJAEY The problem is that the kind of person that would buy a GTR would never buy a LFA and vice versa. A GTR owner wants to drive and an LFA owner wants to show off. Toyota really hasn't made anything in the real realm of sports cars for awhile. The bland uninteresting designs and lack of performance inovation has hurt the pre 1997 Toyota fan base and now 400k later, really?? But I would buy the GTR even if I did have the money for a LFA. Tell the truth I'd buy 4 and get better resale value.
gdiligent 1 week ago
@CJAEY what are you babbling about? The GTR was NOT built to be "the fastest production car out there" (whatever that means) Fastest 1/4 mile? Fastest 1/8 mile? Fastest top speed? I can think of a few production cars that Rival the GTR's times. Ever heard of a the new 5.4 Supercharged mustang? Or maybe the new 6.2 liter corvette, camaro and cadillac CTS-v (all of which have superchargers)? Each one of these cars costs around $50k (maybe 60k at most) and all hit 11 seconds in the 1/4 mile
CopyWhite 1 week ago
two cars designed to corner on a 1/4 mile, hmmm that makes sense.
ferrarikingdom 1 week ago
wowwwwwwwwww, the LFA soundslike an F1
chengitis 1 week ago
Corvette ZR1 would rape these crapanese cars. godzilla ain't got shit on KING KONG!!!
Trx450rallday 1 week ago
fuck you youtube piece of shit
ike000000 1 week ago
Yeah bring the supra back! But honestly I don't think a 1/4 mile drag means crap, the GT-R can turn way harder then the LFA, but honestly it's down to peoples preferences
TheWaffleSS 1 week ago
I'm with this guy, bring back the supra!
graffkingsNBC 1 week ago
TOYOTA BRING BACK SUPRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PaitPait1 1 week ago
lfa is just ugly, the back looks like a droopy eyed dog, and the front looks like an asian kid sucking on sour candy
mossyncamo 1 week ago
I would just get the gt-r. An all wheel drive car is hard to beat off the line stock. Horse power is nothing if you can't put it to the ground. Any real racer knows that.
xRomeo999 1 week ago
theres 2 now lol saw it last night when they presented it as a gift haha
VyneBmxJR 1 week ago
Nearly 100k for a high 11 second 1/4 mile car...pass. And 400k for one that's only a hair faster? For 20k you can build a car that's easily a low 11 second/high 10 second car. Crazy prices.
usnsailor20 1 week ago
@usnsailor20 Anyone can do that if you have the money, but the LFA isn't market towards that type of demographic. It's market towards the rich with a taste for supercars. They are both great cars I would love to have both of them, but if you were to give me a choice between the LFA or the GTR? I'd take the LFA. That's just me though. To each to their own.
CookJunkie 1 week ago
$400,000? NO BUENO, I WILL STICK WITH $90,000
alex52184 1 week ago
V10 sounds sexy
weiwei8899livemailtw 1 week ago
Comment removed
4blakE2duB0nesS 1 week ago
BUT LISTEN TO THAT NOISE!
alexleeupton 1 week ago
Love of
Fast
Automobiles
That has to be LFA stands for!!!
mdavid22 1 week ago
I can't watch this because of pop-up commercial site, terrible
pirokun63 1 week ago
3:01-3:10 Best part. " Or is it? "
Lokiito503 1 week ago
I like both cars, but when you can get the GTR for under 100k and then put the stage 1 kit on it bumping it up to 700hp, spend another 300K on the LFA
lewis8840 1 week ago
400K???? fuck that. why not just buy a lambo aventador with that money
ryu1036 1 week ago
400.000 against 85.000 haha!! Toyota still sucks.
scfog90 1 week ago 18
@scfog90 Do you often shop at walmart?
strangerindanger 1 week ago
@scfog90 how said already CJAEY, and others adequate people - it's absolutely incorrect to compare those two cars.. Will you compare Ferrari 599 and Supra? Of cource fucking not!!! Will you compare Bentley Continental and Ford gt????? fucking no! LFA and GT-R is two amazing, but absolutely different things! Gt-r was made originally for fastest cornering, it's fast, it's reliable, it has 4 seats and boot, it's even expensive - stunning sports car! LFA - unique status-showing supercar
SublimeOrange 1 week ago
@scfog90 if you like - gtr was made to be great pal for burn-out, drag racing and cornering, it's an RACING icon. LFA it's not a racing car. It's just Lexus/Toyota attempt to make something iconic and nominal, like "Japan Aston Martin" or, I don't know, "Asian Ferrari", whatever. However, price could be 100k less, I think, but)
SublimeOrange 1 week ago
@scfog90 TOYOTA ? HAHHAHA
piterken107 1 week ago
@piterken107 You should know that Lexus is owned by Toyota, so its Toyatas engineers working on the LFA!! HAHAHAHA about your comment!! Idiot
scfog90 1 week ago
@scfog90 but is more fast the lamborghini gallardo lp560-4 in the topgear test track, and have a tecnology playstation, so toyota is not sucks.
JT1000RS 1 week ago
@scfog90 400.000 vs 85.000 your using decimals separate cash values so are you saying
400 dollars vs 85 dollars. Also it seems your saying 400 dollars vs 85 dollars like if money was fighting.
WatcherofTapes 1 week ago
@WatcherofTapes wtf?? you smoke sth?? I dont if it seems like money would be "fighting". It a competition between two spotscars!! So gtfo
scfog90 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Toyota really needs to bring back the Supra (and not change the styling too much, it's perfect as is). Imagine being able to own a NEW one instead of having to shop around for one with low miles (rare feat) and one that hasn't been abused? There's sellers that sell them with 76k-90k miles for $25,000. Shoot, if a new one was available to get through a car loan but with no miles then I would totally take on the debt. Sweet performance sports car!!
Emad5501 1 week ago
This guy has the worst sounding accent in the world
BigBallsOfFarly 1 week ago
the LFA looks and sounds amazing!!!
But the heavy GT-R is still faster to 60mph...?!
and when you put a tuning into the gt-r, that he would have the same HP like the LFA, i guess the LFA would loose on the quater mile...
paparazzizi 1 week ago
Barely? Just like Vin Diesel said... WINNING IS WINNING
powerFamosa 1 week ago
i want millions of dollars please god!
ubitches420 1 week ago
4 wheel drive.....
ericnomics1 1 week ago
WTF?!?! In the other motor trend video when they get 11 cars together, the GT-R beats every car in this race but the LFA is also in it!!!!!
xtoad9 1 week ago
@xtoad9
this is an old video motor trend didnt race the 2012 GTR vs the lfa let alone the GTR spec V
nyelement007 1 week ago
Lexus LFA? i bet LFA stands for Lookin' Fucking Awesome.
TheRealFreshbee 1 week ago
there has been 2 years of improvements to the Gt-r since the 2010. Way to waste time Motortrend.
DerrickKohlhorst 1 week ago
search for "World's Greatest Drag Race" on youtube and youll be surprised
foooock 1 week ago
I like the nissAHHn gtr
jweezyswag526 2 weeks ago
not bad for a v6. way to go, nissan.
16134R 2 weeks ago
as much as a fanatic of toyota I am. I would still buy a gtr and upgrade it. However give me that engine in the LFA and put it in a FT86 or AE86 man i can see fun. SOOOO how much for the Engine? lmao
GamerToosmart 2 weeks ago
ok now putthis against the 400 grand gtr 2012 black edition
SuperRehank 2 weeks ago
The Lexus looks more a Nissan then the Nissan. When you're spending that kind of money, the style should be MUCH more "supercar like". Of course, with the top Supercars (Bugatti and Aston One-77) costing $1million+++, the Lexus is more like "entry level" (LOL) Supercar...
saxjamin 2 weeks ago
and it barely beat the gtr
MrSoapsoclean 2 weeks ago
for 400 thousand lexus can go fuck themselves
MrSoapsoclean 2 weeks ago
lets buy a gt-r put another 300 grand in modifications into it then well see who wins.
GalaxyTrigger82 2 weeks ago
$300,000 for half a car length?! Whoever buys this car is retarded.
ItsSanny 2 weeks ago
Makes sense...but in their ultimate drag race video they had 11 cars including these two and the GTR shit all over everything. The nissan driver in this one sucks, proven
Drasnovia 2 weeks ago
Lets be real, if money wasn't an issue, we would all take the LFA. Its a much more beautiful car. And that sound. Don't get me started.
jdubin94 2 weeks ago
LFA is missing a stylish rear wing.
BandLowBattery 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
BandLowBattery 2 weeks ago
The biggest thing people need to realize is that you more than likely get more pussy when you roll up in a LFA than if you roll up in a GTR....THE END.
CobraVerde601 2 weeks ago
@CobraVerde601 no youd get more pussy in a lambo...
fatty1443 2 weeks ago
ok Now test it against the 2012 GTR :/
mfuji02 2 weeks ago
The lexus LFA is too expensive for what you are getting, the gtr does the same if not better for a lot less
javyrmz 2 weeks ago
Can't wait to see a LFA vs Tony Stark's NSX drag race!
whodashit 2 weeks ago
Gtr will 300k and the gtr will probably blow up...ok maybe not but it will have A LOT of problems
BitchIAintStupid 2 weeks ago
@BitchIAintStupid Your name is ironic, because clearly you ARE stupid.
vanillanigger 2 weeks ago
Isn't it funny these GTR trolls trying to defend the GTR when the GTR was made for performance and the LFA was made to be exclusive. LOLLOLOLOLOL
WORSTEVERR 2 weeks ago
they are compare a 2012 Lexus LFA and 2010 Nissan GT-R,compare with 2012 GTR......lexus LFA owned!
TheNakedasshole 2 weeks ago
@TheNakedasshole Let us know when the GTR reaches 200 MPH please.
WORSTEVERR 2 weeks ago
the 2012 GT-R will eat that lfa
skillzlibat 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=cBx__69pkpY
We The People
Real Change
Ron Paul Revolution
Spread the truth.
ItsMrWinters 2 weeks ago
in case yall cant read right i put ".1 second" on my comment look closer and you'll see that there is a space between those periods.
eloyleyva 2 weeks ago
The one that owns an LFA can afford the GTR as well...so wtf does it matter?
ericleeSupSayK 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch this sexy video of me dancing. I put a lot of effort into making this video so give it a shot.
Copy paste the address below or see my channel.
watch?v=ZzwcHo4XWYo
sAlainVideos 2 weeks ago
2012 vs 2012. then see what would happen. 300 grand? GTR!
Thewhitenerd 2 weeks ago 22
this car is worth more than my house
nguyentuan1990 2 weeks ago
Would anyone be kind enough to give me $400,000? I think I'd look good in a LFA :)
Amaniswonsan 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
alexdrum94 2 weeks ago
The back reminds me of the Audi R8
DareMeTheCrazy 2 weeks ago
It's all about traction and attraction.
Speed and gurlz
techjoe040669 2 weeks ago
Price really makes no sense, What if you bought a GT-R and spent the rest tuning it to the price tag of the LFA? That would be a rocket.
petaredrev 2 weeks ago
ok this was one test... the 1/4 mile. I'm sure Toyota doesn't expect people to pay 400k for 1/4 mile times. I mean an ugly ass foxbody with 20k dumped in it would beat that. But that's not the point of this car. But I have a volvo so what do I know.
elbradamontes 2 weeks ago
nobody ever talks about the fuel economy
espedid 2 weeks ago