difference is agbonlahor can receive the ball back to a defender, turn, beat him, and the sprint like the wind. lennon can only use his speed when running on to a through ball usually from modric or van der vaart
Agbonlahor is probably faster-I am only basing my answer on physics- because the smaller you are, the easier it is to turn quickly around obstacles, such as the ones in this video. Agbonlahor is obviously quite a bit taller than lennon and he beat lennon to the ball anyway so in a straight sprint, I would vote for Agbonlahor.
@XxMistaClutchxX Agbonlahor is big and use more power to brake and change direction and also use more time to get to top speed. Agbonlahor will win in a straight line, Lennon wins with the ball
@XxMistaClutchxX no haha, learn physics. Agbonlahor is taller and heavier therefor he uses lose more speed when he change direction and he uses more time to hit top speed. Lennon have shorter legs, and can hit top speed after 2-3 steps so on this test Lennon should beat Agbonlahor. But Agbonlahor was even faster without the ball. And Agbonlahor will own Lennon on a 100m
@1337inzock its not all about size, its how tight you can get to the flag and how you stop. lennon took more steps slowing down than agbonlahor did. and lennons 100m time is 10.2 secs, o doubt agbonlahor can get that
@XxMistaClutchxX you fail. Cristiano is not fast at all, I know maybe 100 players that are faster than him. Cr7 runs in slower than 11seconds. Walcott 10,35. Lennon don't have a official time, but people say he can run sub 10.60
@XxMistaClutchxX you did not have proof on walcott 100m time, don't believe a comment that says he can run 10,2secs lol. Like you said lennon only uses 2-3 steps to hit top speed so why should he be even faster on a straigt line when he can't increase his speed after 2-3 steps? Agbonlahor got better time without the ball and Agbonlahor will be even faster on a straight line since he don't hit top speed after only 2-3 steps
@1337inzock cr7 is ridic fast, agbonlahor isnt as fast as lennon, when agbonlahor can out run patrice evra who is 20 yds ahead of him to the ball then ill maybe admit hes on the same level as lennon
Walcott is faster than both of them its a fact you can even check Walcott did 100m in 10.3 seconds which makes him the fastest professional footballer alive.
@SnipR1980 None of them are even close to Walcott. Also Messi isn't as fast as you might think he is very fast with the ball but when it comes to a pure sprint Bale and Ronaldo are faster than him. 1.Walcott 2. Bale 3. Ronaldo 4.Messi
I'm pretty sure everyone can agree that Chuck Norris is the fastest. If you read this comment and don't agree, he will come to your house and punch you in the face.
To people mentioning Walcott. It's clear why Lennon was taken to South Africa over Walcott, because Walcott is 2 years younger and has less pro experience than Lennon. They are probably both equally as fast but Lennon I think will hold his own better under the pressure.
Walcott also had a habit of scoring while on the wing lol? I don't know. Owen was at France 98' at 18 years old. I guess only training proves it and Walcott obviously didn't cut it. We don't know the full story to judge.
capello is there to fuck us man, not to increase our football level. After all he's an italian scum and he doesn't give a fuck about english football. we should sack him as soon as possible.
@fonsecascp You're just a person who wants to bend ronaldo over and rape him ronaldo is about 5th fastest in the world, down on paper Theo walcott from england is the fastest, The FA rate him 95 Pace.
being fast is a great benefit but not the most important. more important is how well you read the game and place yourself on the pitch. must admit tht i like more quick players. their moves are great to watch. if you are slow there are many ways to improve your speed and acclereation. in my opinion everybody can be fast. of course speed is gift tht you get in your moms womb meaning anybody can`t be usain bolt
Agbonlahor doesn't use his pace as much now though, probably as every defender knows they've gotta keep an eye on him, but when he's actually on the ball he rarely runs past the defender with it so his speed doesn't matter
OK, so Joffre Guerrón, David Ondonkor, Royston Drenthe, Nedum Onuoha, Eliseu Pereira are all very fast. Kaka is suprisingly fast, considering he never actually fully sprints!
However, I would go with the fact that the top 3 fastest footballers all happen toplay in the Premiership and are all English, even though GB hasn't had a good olympic sprinter since Christie. Yeah, makes sense.
what is seen is what is judged.. who told FIFA to base a rank of the 'world's' supposedly best player, on performances in European competitions only.. case arrested..
Maybe it's because the best players from other continents get picked up to play at a higher level (E.g. European competitions). If they don't, then they can't be judged against the other top players in the world. It is impossible to rank a player if you don't know whether they're any good against other good players.
How has that got anything to do with speed? You're the worst debater I have ever witnessed.
mate you're not making any sense.. its illogical to think that the freign players playing in Europe are the best of their kind, and regional, for FIFA to base its ranking scheme on European football..
since that is the case, i think it is an accreditation, to pick the world's fastest player based on European football...and this case, not only has it been well documented that these players are the fastest, but i have also noticed and affirmed it..
@thebronsonite i find your so called speed test results hilarious. Please inform me of how David Bentley is in the list. My granny is faster than him. And Agbonlahor and Walcott dont make it, haha BULLSHIT
@thebronsonite i think u mean there nike's not yours. I dont see the point your making, it has no relevance to the video what so ever, posting a complete retarded list and when i say its bullshit u questoin my intelligence. Good 1 there.
that is true, but whats the point?? if your trying to outrun someone without the ball or with, id rather have the ball at my feet and agbonahlor should be defender if thats the case
I wanna see Lennon vs Walcott in a race - now that would be special! But who woud you guys start on the right in the WC? Current form I'd go for Lennon even though I'm a big Walcott fan
Lennon has really worked on his end product a lot recently, he used to be total shite in the final 3rd of the pitch. Walcott does have skill and i think he's a better finisher than Lennon, we'll have to see who's in form at the end of the season.
@arbi90 I take it your an arsenal fan buddy... well if walcott is better than lennon why didnt he make the world cup final 23? and lennon did!!!!! lennon Sh!ts all over walcott, sure they are probably both equally as fast but when it comes ball control and the end product lennon is far superior, lennons close ball control is better and he is a better crosser. (and im not a tottenham fan either)
@JacksonGeorgeTennant hehe no man actually I like Lennon more then Walcott,and no I 'm not Arsenal supporter :D I just said that walcott is a litle bit faster but lennon has better acceleration, and I fallowed their carrier Lennon got better and better while it went not so good for walcott :)
@JacksonGeorgeTennant dont mean nothing about Lennon gettin picked over Walcott.. when the fact is he called up Heskey (3 goals all last season) over D Bent, Agbonlahoor.. useless decisions, Walcott will improve and imo will have a bright future for England jus needs more playing time
@konartis5 Mate... lennon was picked over walcott coz he is a better player, walcott is SOOOO overated and his ball control at full speed is very average!!!! And comparing this to Heskey getting selected ahead of Bent and Agbonlahor is wrong... heskey is a completely different player to both Bent and Agbonlahor he was chosen to give england a different option up front, he is a forward who holds the ball up and brings others into the game and Bent and Agbonlahor are all about speed.
@JacksonGeorgeTennant nah we dont need that kinda player in Heskey up front.. its fucking 2010 not 1980.. Heskey offers little more than holding the ball up and his strength.. he got no pace, no technique, skill, vision, pass, cant finish.. jus useless in my opinion.. look at Spain, Netherlands.. they "hold the ball up".. in MIDFIELD! patience play, play it around then give it to their strikers in space.. not hoofing it up to a big lump up front like Heskey, its embarressing playing like that
Heskey is the fastest with and without the ball
xmarks97 4 days ago
difference is agbonlahor can receive the ball back to a defender, turn, beat him, and the sprint like the wind. lennon can only use his speed when running on to a through ball usually from modric or van der vaart
terminator1526 3 weeks ago
Aaron lennon, what a player.
marshallmeyer1 1 month ago
lennon is not that fast with ball in real matches....but he's really fast without it
tryhardgangsters 1 month ago
Agbonlahor 1st PLACE!:D
wic89 2 months ago
agbonlahor is best
OGZxZMo 2 months ago
gareth bale
chuckkicksass 3 months ago
HANS SARPEI :D
MrBendakstarkiller 3 months ago
Per Mertersacker did this at the same time as these two. He's almost finished.
0121zero 3 months ago 3
in a dead on sprint i dont think anyone is as fast as lennon
XxMistaClutchxX 4 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX well thats wrong considering agbonlahor beat lennon without the ball?
wbafc4lyf 2 months ago
@wbafc4lyf you do realize w/out the ball is them weaving in and out of the obstacles? straight on sprint lennon is the fastest
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX
Agbonlahor is probably faster-I am only basing my answer on physics- because the smaller you are, the easier it is to turn quickly around obstacles, such as the ones in this video. Agbonlahor is obviously quite a bit taller than lennon and he beat lennon to the ball anyway so in a straight sprint, I would vote for Agbonlahor.
MrLiamcfc 2 months ago
@MrLiamcfc agbonlahor is fast, on a straight sprint i dont see him beating lennon
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX Agbonlahor is big and use more power to brake and change direction and also use more time to get to top speed. Agbonlahor will win in a straight line, Lennon wins with the ball
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock w/out the ball lennon would still win, he goes from standing to top speed in aroud 2-3 steps. agbonlahor is bigger yes but not faster
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX lennon win with the ball like proven in this video. Agbonlahor will be much faster on a straight line
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock i dont see any player beating him in a dead on sprint
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX this is Lennon vs Agbonlahor see at the sugestions video, Agbonlahor vs Lennon. Agbonlahor got better time without the ball
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock but that is not a straight line, thats weaving in and out of flags. straight line lennon is the fastest
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX no haha, learn physics. Agbonlahor is taller and heavier therefor he uses lose more speed when he change direction and he uses more time to hit top speed. Lennon have shorter legs, and can hit top speed after 2-3 steps so on this test Lennon should beat Agbonlahor. But Agbonlahor was even faster without the ball. And Agbonlahor will own Lennon on a 100m
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock its not all about size, its how tight you can get to the flag and how you stop. lennon took more steps slowing down than agbonlahor did. and lennons 100m time is 10.2 secs, o doubt agbonlahor can get that
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX proof? Walcott 100m time is 10,35 so I doublt lennon can go so fast. Ronaldo (Brazillian) was even faster.
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock look it up, both lennon and cr7 got around 10.2
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX you fail. Cristiano is not fast at all, I know maybe 100 players that are faster than him. Cr7 runs in slower than 11seconds. Walcott 10,35. Lennon don't have a official time, but people say he can run sub 10.60
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock are you stupid? ronaldo is lightning speed. hes ridic fast. you obv have never seen him play
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX lol, are you stupid? I said Cristiano(Cr7) Cristiano is not that fast. But Ronaldo( Brazillian) was the fastest of all time
1337inzock 2 months ago
@XxMistaClutchxX you did not have proof on walcott 100m time, don't believe a comment that says he can run 10,2secs lol. Like you said lennon only uses 2-3 steps to hit top speed so why should he be even faster on a straigt line when he can't increase his speed after 2-3 steps? Agbonlahor got better time without the ball and Agbonlahor will be even faster on a straight line since he don't hit top speed after only 2-3 steps
1337inzock 2 months ago
@1337inzock cr7 is ridic fast, agbonlahor isnt as fast as lennon, when agbonlahor can out run patrice evra who is 20 yds ahead of him to the ball then ill maybe admit hes on the same level as lennon
XxMistaClutchxX 2 months ago
@MrLiamcfc damn right, Abonlahor is 5"11 or 6ft and he is pretty heavy. Lennon is only 5"5
1337inzock 2 months ago
Agbonlagoal
navajeromad 4 months ago
ryo miyaichi?
aSH0GUN 5 months ago
Bolt is actually quite good at footbal!
DazBreezyFan14 5 months ago
hussain balt: -
to the ball= 4seconds
with the ball= 4 hours
saif1337 5 months ago 16
Comment removed
saif1337 5 months ago
what about usain bolt?
reecepenn97 5 months ago 4
Sami Hyypia?
seanyboi07 5 months ago
Emile Heskey ??
FifaNisse 6 months ago 2
Forest Gump
AtillaExclusive 6 months ago
Shane long ?
OllieNeish 6 months ago
Those noises are mad annoying
Waitingbythemailbox 6 months ago
messi :)
twtiw015 6 months ago
chicarito was clocked as the fastest man in the last world cup.
32IRISHPRIDE 6 months ago 5
Walcott is faster than both of them its a fact you can even check Walcott did 100m in 10.3 seconds which makes him the fastest professional footballer alive.
Marko4ever12 7 months ago
CHUCK NORRIS IS FASTER.
ohyabeauty95 7 months ago
who won??
bsbssb1 7 months ago
walcott is the fastest of these 2, though he didnt do too well in this fastness test, even though he got 10.03 in a 100m sprint
afromasterchief 7 months ago
@afromasterchief
obafemi martins , 10,2 , and there are alot you dont know
RampageK1X 7 months ago
Lenon is way faster :)
bob52458 7 months ago
Walcott, Lennon, Chicharito,Valencia..
ChapajDzideKRU 7 months ago
I want to see a Bale, Ronadlo, Messi, Walcott battle. :D I think Walcott or Ronaldo would win.
SnipR1980 7 months ago
@SnipR1980 None of them are even close to Walcott. Also Messi isn't as fast as you might think he is very fast with the ball but when it comes to a pure sprint Bale and Ronaldo are faster than him. 1.Walcott 2. Bale 3. Ronaldo 4.Messi
Marko4ever12 7 months ago
WALLCOT YOUNG AND VALENCIA are faster
superfunkmonker 7 months ago
it's chicarito...
jesuiskit 7 months ago
Antonio Valencia - In a straight line hes a fuckin train
SidOram1 7 months ago 2
and when does walcott pass this test? o_0
kryslerShit 7 months ago
ronaldo and walcott...........aare the fastest
hassan4117 7 months ago 2
watched both lennon 13.9 other guy 14.06
MegaFincham 8 months ago
my pet cheetah is faster; hes only like 2 human years old
SPECIALK44444 8 months ago
yeah lennon is faster at this type of exercise and has more agility. i think in a straight line, agbonlahor would be quicker
jhut87 8 months ago
I'm pretty sure everyone can agree that Chuck Norris is the fastest. If you read this comment and don't agree, he will come to your house and punch you in the face.
Shaftsus 8 months ago
isnt hernandez the fastest?
MrMrknowitall85 8 months ago
@MrMrknowitall85 Hernandez was the fastest player at the 2010 World Cup, yeah.
SaiHarrington 7 months ago
@SaiHarrington
how do you know he was the fastest player?
mufc4527 7 months ago
Lennon is got amazing acceleration but he doesnt have the best top speed over distances like ronaldo can do
F3ARL3SSJ 8 months ago
I am the fastest
rFcDaRR3N 8 months ago
Walcott fastest player in football atm I believe.
JoeMoSexuals 8 months ago
wat about walcott
grandtheftauto4IV 9 months ago 36
@grandtheftauto4IV What about your grammar pleb?
ChuggerX 2 months ago
Cristiano Ronaldo is the fastest in the world.
TheKuka007 9 months ago
Rasiak
WhiteBandit007 9 months ago
walcott..
guitarabz4 9 months ago 7
fuck .....................
fadhelsuryanaputra 10 months ago
fuck
fadhelsuryanaputra 10 months ago
my grandma
KantiMitHut 10 months ago
I HATE HOW THEY FILM THIS SHIT!!!! Get a fucking fixed camera!!!!
Afr0Afr0 10 months ago
Neymar
scottishboy1987 10 months ago
pato
lordvivec87 11 months ago
Palermo
TheAngelIvan 11 months ago
Sergio Agüero
Sundal1337 11 months ago
Wayne Allison!!!!!
stonercfc 11 months ago
kuyt
PlaneCrash96 11 months ago
@PlaneCrash96
lol, after an hour of sprinting yes. Then Kuyt will beat them :)
bronco08 11 months ago
Lennon
luukman123 1 year ago
lennons a faster dribbler agbonlahors faster in a sprit Imao
MrCiaran91 1 year ago 3
HESKEY!
dampskizz 1 year ago 6
who is faster, lennon, walcott or agbonlahor?
formigamayne 1 year ago
Agbonlahor is Too Sick
InSaNexShaNkz 1 year ago
Walcott
Mokeejoe5 1 year ago 4
Bale.
dannaay 1 year ago
I judge people on their footballing ability not their pace, like you english do..
pwt10 1 year ago
Martins
Z1My 1 year ago
agbonlahor
1forza1milan1 1 year ago 2
i think lennon is faster
esox0fan 1 year ago 3
Gabby Agbonlahor is dynamite off the ball. Lennon probably edges it on the ball.
astonv07 1 year ago
walcott
LumixGoals 1 year ago 16
Doesn't matter who is fastest. it's the end product that counts. Lennon's getting better but still needs to improve in that department.
Don't know enough about Agbonlahor to comment.
basilvictorhomer 1 year ago
bale faster
kerusirotan1 1 year ago
walcott smacks both of em
3dGOA 1 year ago 3
AGBONLAHOR FFS ! :D
albinp100 1 year ago
neil ruddock
jrprentice1000 1 year ago
nope Lennon was faster ;)
Deviantcookie 1 year ago
Lennon with the ball, Agbonlahor without
ShinyJaker 1 year ago
@ShinyJaker Yup, but what really matters is overall time- getting to the ball and then dribbling for the goal.
toddmiyamoto 1 year ago
yup agbonlahor is faster
danb01111 1 year ago
John Terry is obviously faster.
Willsy96 1 year ago 2
hatem ben arfa is faster than both
Robotdrummerzzk 1 year ago
lennon is faster, no doubt.
tjaperd 1 year ago
walcott walcott walcott
JironCFC 1 year ago
Agbonlahor
Coolshamstar 1 year ago
@17556836456859445547
lma lennon assbut
kutlijer 1 year ago
walcott wernt there cuz hed embarass them
MrSPORTnSTUFF 1 year ago
Emile Heskey
bucko06 1 year ago 5
Walcott
lead111 1 year ago
i love agbonlahor
from ksa
XaBouThM3nX 1 year ago
Comment removed
HankyPanky789 1 year ago
AGBONLAHOR ! future england top player (;
heysexy1997 1 year ago
@heysexy1997 Or not
bucko06 1 year ago
To people mentioning Walcott. It's clear why Lennon was taken to South Africa over Walcott, because Walcott is 2 years younger and has less pro experience than Lennon. They are probably both equally as fast but Lennon I think will hold his own better under the pressure.
Walcott also had a habit of scoring while on the wing lol? I don't know. Owen was at France 98' at 18 years old. I guess only training proves it and Walcott obviously didn't cut it. We don't know the full story to judge.
RewindMJ 1 year ago
Agbonlahor > Defoe.
Shaftsus 1 year ago
I think Ivica Olic is faster....
ufousonlo 1 year ago
sol campbell would have em both if he doesn't have to change direction and gets a 100 yard run up.
frnkwho 1 year ago
i think gabriel lennon is faster than aaron agbonlahor
hehe
jimmy13United 1 year ago
Usain Bolt
chilakalaka 1 year ago 7
Chuck Norris
cheesefiddler 1 year ago 3
Ivica Olic
ufousonlo 1 year ago
im faster then both
ZiSOK 1 year ago
Can't believe Agbonlahor isn't named in Capello's 30-man squad....
TitaniumProwler 1 year ago 60
@TitaniumProwler Agbonlahor is fast but a shit footballer
The1anonly2 1 year ago
@TitaniumProwler
capello is there to fuck us man, not to increase our football level. After all he's an italian scum and he doesn't give a fuck about english football. we should sack him as soon as possible.
bitlord888 7 months ago
@TitaniumProwler Cause hes shit!
SystemBrandon 7 months ago
they are all fast, but Ronaldo is faster
fonsecascp 1 year ago
@fonsecascp You're just a person who wants to bend ronaldo over and rape him ronaldo is about 5th fastest in the world, down on paper Theo walcott from england is the fastest, The FA rate him 95 Pace.
BennTomoo 1 year ago
Lennon is faster due to hi lower centre of gravity, better agility. Straight race tho, and Gabby would rape him. Hes so fast you wouldnt believe.
wwaarrddy 1 year ago
agbonlahor is faster without the ball and lennon is faster with the ball
god u guys are fukin retarded, a little kid could have told u that
solimon33 1 year ago
You can think that Agbonlahor is faster but in fact Lennon is faster...
FunOrNotFun 1 year ago
you guys are retarded. lennon is faster - see he corresponding video of agbonlahor...
tarooqii 1 year ago
they both are faster but walcott is the fastest
LaStRiDe9 1 year ago 3
Uhh..Agbonlahor is a striker not a midfielder.
BeanieBasstard 1 year ago
being fast is a great benefit but not the most important. more important is how well you read the game and place yourself on the pitch. must admit tht i like more quick players. their moves are great to watch. if you are slow there are many ways to improve your speed and acclereation. in my opinion everybody can be fast. of course speed is gift tht you get in your moms womb meaning anybody can`t be usain bolt
overlevnadsoverall 1 year ago
Agbonlahor doesn't use his pace as much now though, probably as every defender knows they've gotta keep an eye on him, but when he's actually on the ball he rarely runs past the defender with it so his speed doesn't matter
I'd go for Lennon over him.
The13thD1sciple 1 year ago
I think Agbonlahor is faster
mattsson20 1 year ago 76
@mattsson20 Agbanlahor's time was 14:06, so no, he isn't.
toddmiyamoto 1 year ago
@mattsson20
off the ball
Lennon: 6.53
Agbonglahor: 6:49
on the ball
Lennon: 7:37
Agbonglahor:7:57 SO they're pretty much the same, regardless of what you think
32wallace 1 year ago
@mattsson20 yeah but he isn't, you can se that in the total time...
graffilip 11 months ago
@mattsson20 But lennon got more agility because he's smaller
BigSliceMerkAaaXx 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
iTS fUNNY HOW ALL THE FASTEST PLAYERS IN THE PREM ARE MIXED RACE=BEST OF BOTH LOL
UKHUSTLER94 2 years ago
agbonlahor is faster to the ball, lennon is faster with the ball. So who is the fastest sprinter? Agbonlahor, who is the faster dribbler? Lennon
guyavfc2 2 years ago
well put guyavfc2..
Agbonlahor= fastest player in the world..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
Walcott is faster than Agbonlahor and I would bet there are faster footballers in other nations.
thebronsonite 2 years ago
I've checked, there isnt any quicker..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar You've checked everyone?
I'd be surprised. look at Overmars, he was quicker than them.
thebronsonite 2 years ago
@thebronsonite
last time i checked.. marc overmars was 36.. lets be current shall we..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar
It's an example idiot.
OK, so Joffre Guerrón, David Ondonkor, Royston Drenthe, Nedum Onuoha, Eliseu Pereira are all very fast. Kaka is suprisingly fast, considering he never actually fully sprints!
However, I would go with the fact that the top 3 fastest footballers all happen toplay in the Premiership and are all English, even though GB hasn't had a good olympic sprinter since Christie. Yeah, makes sense.
thebronsonite 2 years ago
@ thebronsonite
If you really belive all those listed players are well and truely fast, then i go with the supposition that all players are fast.. pls!
anyway...i still stand by my words, unswayed by your rather illogical remonstrations..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar
You are hilarious.
You're going with the fact that the three fastest players, in the entire footballing world, happen to be English?! Sorry, who's illogical?
thebronsonite 2 years ago
what is seen is what is judged.. who told FIFA to base a rank of the 'world's' supposedly best player, on performances in European competitions only.. case arrested..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar
Case arrested? LMFAO You are a joker.
Maybe it's because the best players from other continents get picked up to play at a higher level (E.g. European competitions). If they don't, then they can't be judged against the other top players in the world. It is impossible to rank a player if you don't know whether they're any good against other good players.
How has that got anything to do with speed? You're the worst debater I have ever witnessed.
thebronsonite 2 years ago
mate you're not making any sense.. its illogical to think that the freign players playing in Europe are the best of their kind, and regional, for FIFA to base its ranking scheme on European football..
since that is the case, i think it is an accreditation, to pick the world's fastest player based on European football...and this case, not only has it been well documented that these players are the fastest, but i have also noticed and affirmed it..
Vannereveilar 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar
Don't call me mate, and...
Why is it illogical?
OK, where's the documentation?
thebronsonite 2 years ago
@Vannereveilar
No documentation eh?
Case arrested! LOL
thebronsonite 2 years ago
thebronsonite 1 year ago
@thebronsonite ye but th actually prems fastest player ( acording to stats ) is theo wallcott he is faster than the british olympic sprinter
qISnowmanIp 1 year ago
@thebronsonite i find your so called speed test results hilarious. Please inform me of how David Bentley is in the list. My granny is faster than him. And Agbonlahor and Walcott dont make it, haha BULLSHIT
TheJonny190 1 year ago
@TheJonny190 Good point. They're mine, not Nike's.
I think it's crap too to be honest, but it was just trying to make a point that seems to have been completely above your level of intelligence.
thebronsonite 1 year ago
@thebronsonite i think u mean there nike's not yours. I dont see the point your making, it has no relevance to the video what so ever, posting a complete retarded list and when i say its bullshit u questoin my intelligence. Good 1 there.
TheJonny190 1 year ago
@TheJonny190
So sarcasm's above you too, huh? lmfao
thebronsonite 1 year ago
that is true, but whats the point?? if your trying to outrun someone without the ball or with, id rather have the ball at my feet and agbonahlor should be defender if thats the case
laza4liverpool 2 years ago
Comment removed
dhuuso 2 years ago
I wanna see Lennon vs Walcott in a race - now that would be special! But who woud you guys start on the right in the WC? Current form I'd go for Lennon even though I'm a big Walcott fan
sajiduk 2 years ago
@sajiduk i wud go for lennon ,
hes got better ball control and im a spurs fan
but then again walcott iss goodbut he play for arsenal :L, but lennon is do alright this seasion
IAmDrumNBass 2 years ago
Lennon for sure over walcott for the WC.... walcott is shit he has no skill at all hes just got speed!
JacksonGeorgeTennant 2 years ago
Lennon has really worked on his end product a lot recently, he used to be total shite in the final 3rd of the pitch. Walcott does have skill and i think he's a better finisher than Lennon, we'll have to see who's in form at the end of the season.
sajiduk 2 years ago 2
@JacksonGeorgeTennant No Walcott is better then Lennon!!!
arbi90 2 years ago
@arbi90 I take it your an arsenal fan buddy... well if walcott is better than lennon why didnt he make the world cup final 23? and lennon did!!!!! lennon Sh!ts all over walcott, sure they are probably both equally as fast but when it comes ball control and the end product lennon is far superior, lennons close ball control is better and he is a better crosser. (and im not a tottenham fan either)
JacksonGeorgeTennant 1 year ago
@JacksonGeorgeTennant hehe no man actually I like Lennon more then Walcott,and no I 'm not Arsenal supporter :D I just said that walcott is a litle bit faster but lennon has better acceleration, and I fallowed their carrier Lennon got better and better while it went not so good for walcott :)
arbi90 1 year ago
@JacksonGeorgeTennant dont mean nothing about Lennon gettin picked over Walcott.. when the fact is he called up Heskey (3 goals all last season) over D Bent, Agbonlahoor.. useless decisions, Walcott will improve and imo will have a bright future for England jus needs more playing time
konartis5 1 year ago
@konartis5 Mate... lennon was picked over walcott coz he is a better player, walcott is SOOOO overated and his ball control at full speed is very average!!!! And comparing this to Heskey getting selected ahead of Bent and Agbonlahor is wrong... heskey is a completely different player to both Bent and Agbonlahor he was chosen to give england a different option up front, he is a forward who holds the ball up and brings others into the game and Bent and Agbonlahor are all about speed.
JacksonGeorgeTennant 1 year ago
@JacksonGeorgeTennant nah we dont need that kinda player in Heskey up front.. its fucking 2010 not 1980.. Heskey offers little more than holding the ball up and his strength.. he got no pace, no technique, skill, vision, pass, cant finish.. jus useless in my opinion.. look at Spain, Netherlands.. they "hold the ball up".. in MIDFIELD! patience play, play it around then give it to their strikers in space.. not hoofing it up to a big lump up front like Heskey, its embarressing playing like that
konartis5 1 year ago
dammn Lennon is very fast.
Guritaxx 2 years ago
Dejad de mirar videos stupidos d si corre mas Lennon o Agbonlahor... Q mas da? A Sudafrica van a ir Walcott y a Beckham.
bollu31 2 years ago