@bachboy111 You're totally right about the vibrato. In fact the kind of vibrato these girls use was first developed in the beginning of the 20th century
So am I. Well, I should say I have. The orchestra (more like an ensamble) I am in is playing this piece. Next week is our concert and then we will be on break until we start up in January and start playing music for our spring concert.
Actually, it is 17th century music, and aside from a bit of excessive vibrato and a few portimenti, the style seems pretty good, as does the performance in general.
i hate how everybody thinks those are the main parts of the movie...M&C is one of the greatest movies ever.......and there are more parts than the 1:00 long amputation scene
I commented on this a long time ago. Still one of my favorites!! Such a great job you do. As I remember hearing it for the first time so long ago. Love it!!
It was played well and all but just make a note that during this time period of music, vibrato wasn't used....a all... Other than that good performance.
Solist are a great part no doubt, but idk, I like it better with an entire group, we're going to play this in our school, and to be honest, I thought this was a bit slower than what we're gonna do, nontheless awesome work. Oh, and for some reason, for this song we have 2 cellist playing as solist o.o
Yeah, but this celist in particular had a nice mellow tone, and a steady rhythm. The 1st and 2nd violins seemed to be fighting to be heard more clearly. It's a quartet, man. We can hear you. Making it was just poor miking.
Very well done, but more people playing would complement the sound. Case in point, the cellist sounds great but that is the 1st cello part only (I'm a cellist originally). It sounds really spectacular with at least 2 cellos, 2 violas, 3 violins. I played this back in HS in 1996, and I now teach music in HS. I showed this to my class so they could see what we hope to sound like eventually... Beautiful however nonetheless...
My middle school (New Jersey) played this as well.
Though it sounds very nice when played in a quartet I prefer it not to be played in one(we played it in a small chamber orchestra) This is because as you know there are separate parts from the three soloists (sadly only a cello, and 2 violins, I was sad about no viola solo also) When played in a bigger group it sounds like the soloists and the rest of the players are constantly replying to each other, as well as complementing each other)
well he was right this is really shitty without other people i play this with seronata and it sounds much better, just that individual noises like bow strokes etc. plays out really loud.
Wow that was spectacular my favourite corelli piece, i would love to hear you do the overture to handels messiah, now that is an artisitic piece of work.
the slow part maybe, but at that time, boroque period there was no spicatto at all because the shape of the bow, yes it is true that they play with short strokes, but not spicatto
Baroque music is characteristic of martele eighth notes, but deteche sixteenth notes. So as far as I know, I think they played very close to a baroque performance - all they would need now are gut strings, curved bows, and no chin or shoulder rests.
Good performance, the only thing is that instead of playing stacatto, they would've played martele to imitate the barroque sound, well, thats mi opinion
i am extremely impressed! excellent job..I played this in orchestra a while ago and would have never thought it would sound this great in a quartet (especially with a missing secondary cello part, etc). But this is an amazing performance, and I am actually thinking of introducing this piece to my little high school quartet. And I love the vibrato btw unlike others
What a wonderful performance. Despite what the critics say, I am very pleased by what I have just heard from this quartet. And to the critics, Can you do any better?
A lot of criticism about the vibrato here ? Should they also play on period instruments and use gut strings as well ? Oh, and no chin rests or shoulder rests either.
It was well done. Music is a matter of interpretation by the artist.
Utter nonsence the comments on to much tempo, vibrato, emotion! Music IS emotion therefor there is no such thing as to much of it. A tone has to have a bit of vibrato otherwise it is lifeless. And it doesn't matter how fast you are telling a story.
Beautifully played. I've never played this as a quartet before, always been with slightly larger chamber orchestras. Amazing tone, dynamics and interpretation - less vibrato would be my only criticism, other wise - just as Corelli intended!! Keep up the good work.
I suggest you play with a little less vibrato. This is after all a baroque piece and should be played with a bit more restraint and perhaps a bit more swiftly
Don't misunderstand, it's baroque and shouldnt really have vibrato, but these girls arent exactly pros. Theyre just some hillbillies playing nice music. Theres no need to nitpick is all.
Who told you that Baroque pieces don't have vibrato? They always do have some, otherwise they'd be really boring to listen to. However, the vibrato used in Baroque pieces (slower movements with the fingers) should be different from the one you'd use for Classical or Romantic pieces (more "nervous" like movements).
Anyway, I think this was an awesome performance. Well done!
I'm sure the pieces you've heard do have it lol. Enthusiasts, though, know that vibrato is a modern form of expression, not really used in the baroque era. In professional baroque performances, true to the period, vibrato isnt used at all.
These ladies did a nice job. I would suggest a little less vibrato in the opening movement. My favorite recording of this is from Naxos. I was just talking to my teacher the other day about vibrato when playing baroque music. He said that back then vibrato was used "cosmetically" in a similar way that people would wear makeup. If you use vibrato very often in baroque music, then it's like you've smeared lipstick all over your face.
Who cares what Corelli would have wanted. He's dead. Play the music any way you want. Your the performer. Do what you think is right. If you want to play it Baroque like Corelli would have wanted, great. If you want to do something a different go ahead. If everyone played this music the same, it would become boring and dull. I'm personally a traditionalist and I think Baroque should be played Baroque, but you're the performer. You choose.
i agree with violabrain, the musician should be the one to say how much emotion they are going to put into the music, not the way people have played it before.
hey guys...it sounds great...but i agree with Stairway, way too much emotion...the allegro for example...the first and second violon should sound like one violon...but the way you guys played it...i could tell the violons apart...it sounds great but for those who know how correli plays lol will give you a correct critique...nice job though
A veces suenan cosas muy buenas, otras sin embargo no, deben estudiar un poco mas la afinación y la conducción de las ideas musicales. Más allá de todo buen trabajo! Saludos de Buenos Aires, un colega violista.
YES. The idiot that said that is an idiot. Lol. There are some people that claim baroque music should be played with emotion. It shouldn't and I am glad there are people on youtube that understand this like you. GO YOU!
lol, i agree that all music should be played with some emotion, but emotion can be different for a different style, thats like saying you would like to play beethoven on a harpsichord, HAHAHAHAH
Why shouldn't Baroque music be played with emotion? It sounds good doesn't it? Besides, all great art is open for interpretation. If Baroque music is played without emotion all the time then it becomes dull and boring, and people forget about it.
True... but it isn't meant to be played like a romantic piece. I mean... emotion is essential in music but what I'm saying is that baroque is a different style that requires little emotion compared to the romantic era.
I know what you mean, but there are some romanticised versions of Baroque peices that sound spectacular. Search up four seasons karajan here on youtube and you'll see what I mean.
Yeah my orchestra just started playing this today we've only gotten to the Adagio, but it's such a fun song to play isn't it? You guys did an amazing job at making it sound beautiful :)
magnifico¡¡¡
ecnitha 7 months ago
Bravo !!
jhofmann33 9 months ago
Wonderful music and beautifully played. Deserves HD quality for video.
f105ethunderchief 10 months ago
i think it'd be better with less vibrato. it is baroque music after all.
bachboy111 1 year ago
@bachboy111 You're totally right about the vibrato. In fact the kind of vibrato these girls use was first developed in the beginning of the 20th century
larsstrik 5 months ago
I am playing this piece in chamber orchestra. I love it! =)
tillytabby22 1 year ago
@tillytabby22 me too !
mushucello 1 year ago
:) so beautiful
especially the viola part :D
kutekitty7 1 year ago
i am playing this in my orchestra right now i play the cello and some bits r sooo hard!
Rockergal221 1 year ago
@Rockergal221 I'm a soloist for this and you are so totally right !
mushucello 1 year ago
cuidado con los matices y menos vibrato,recuerden que es musica barroca.
Suena bien.
careful with the dinamics, less vibrato too remember it´s baroque.
Sounds good.
MrJuancarlosanaconda 1 year ago
3rd movement's my favorite :D.
SG14ever 2 years ago
Comment removed
danielightning 2 years ago
@danielightning
precisa-se dizer "senzza vibrato"
vaust 1 year ago
Some of the most beautiful music ever composed, and a lovely performance. Cheers!
taufactor 2 years ago
Ah my chamber orchestra is playing this piece :) i am playing the second violin part. very beautiful
Jazminerayne 2 years ago
So am I. Well, I should say I have. The orchestra (more like an ensamble) I am in is playing this piece. Next week is our concert and then we will be on break until we start up in January and start playing music for our spring concert.
bonkaxsente 2 years ago
@Jazminerayne Oh my god me too!!! my chamber orchestra is also playing this and i'm playing the second part! :D
lilypad17 2 years ago
BAROQUE??
xheartland 2 years ago
@xheartland it is baroque
AkMastamind 2 years ago
non riesco a decidermi se siano più belle o più brave! a qualcun' altro l'ardua sentenza!
cherno billy
deciomure45 2 years ago
Wonderful quartet arrangement. Quite accomplished.
165Esmeyer 2 years ago
lovely
Kavir1618 2 years ago
Beautiful! Brings back lots of happy memories - we did it trio too.
jls850807 2 years ago
is beauty....hablo español pero de verdad es genial...
Missimpaty 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is 18th century music played in 19th century style. Articulations, tempi, dynamics are not according to the style.
eucezinha 3 years ago
Actually, it is 17th century music, and aside from a bit of excessive vibrato and a few portimenti, the style seems pretty good, as does the performance in general.
barreltheif 2 years ago
bitch y dont u find a better video
bastianwolf123 2 years ago
secas =P
Gvlc559 3 years ago
i love this music!!!! nice tones......
armegion 3 years ago
Where is this paradise?
Precioso, bonissimo!
Arkady2009 3 years ago
im playing this song 4 school and i have 2 say this is AMAZING! chapeau!
bloodfledgeling 3 years ago
Hey me too.
mako84341 3 years ago
me 2 ! lol
It seems so difficult
xheartland 1 year ago
Not when you're playing second violin :P
SG14ever 1 year ago
@xheartland it is I play the cello solo piece
mushucello 1 year ago
bellissima interpretazione...avete fatto bene...grazie per aver messo.
xCAGx77 3 years ago
a doce musica barroca esta lindissima nas maos destas meninas.
erasmo67adr 3 years ago
extraordinario =)
esme813 3 years ago 5
4:57...sounds bad
Earthling122 3 years ago
Viola part, shift to 3rd posicion with 2nd to 1st finger on D string. But this does not do bad to music. I like interpretation of this piece.
rocomail 3 years ago
Whatever!
Talkinhorn 3 years ago
muy idolas todas!! esta tremendo!
nicoagesta 3 years ago
That adagio was gold. Congratulations
npcs 3 years ago 11
It has been MONTHS, Love your version of it still. :)) indeed.
barbkaus 3 years ago
Master and Commander was awesome!
To bad that kid died...and the other one got his arm amputated.
D:
But yeah. Russel Crowe, the violin, awesome.
:D
yppahJoy 3 years ago
i hate how everybody thinks those are the main parts of the movie...M&C is one of the greatest movies ever.......and there are more parts than the 1:00 long amputation scene
Earthling122 3 years ago
nice performance. I played this core with friends (me on the cello) and sounded awfull
Where is the pastorale?
daktaritubabu 3 years ago
IT´S wonderful! I´m playing this in our orquestra and I´m studing this solo ,I´m cellist.
duartebuno 3 years ago 2
go ahead duarte!
CristoeslaPiedra 3 years ago
Excellent! Love this piece!
iliveinbfe 3 years ago 2
I've loved this one, and especially the part from 4.00-5.00, since I first saw the movie Master and Commander.
reiott 3 years ago
I commented on this a long time ago. Still one of my favorites!! Such a great job you do. As I remember hearing it for the first time so long ago. Love it!!
barbkaus 3 years ago
To me its the second best to A. Vivaldi Summer one of my personal favorite.
mustpaike 3 years ago
It was played well and all but just make a note that during this time period of music, vibrato wasn't used....a all... Other than that good performance.
Cellorubik 3 years ago
there are 2 violins 1 cello and 1 viola right?
or is it 3 violins
grandpianoman08 3 years ago
Your right, 2violins 1 cello and a viola
Batman001 3 years ago
Solist are a great part no doubt, but idk, I like it better with an entire group, we're going to play this in our school, and to be honest, I thought this was a bit slower than what we're gonna do, nontheless awesome work. Oh, and for some reason, for this song we have 2 cellist playing as solist o.o
diemcos 4 years ago
"Beautiful"... "Baroque"...
jave22 4 years ago
encantador
dragteam 4 years ago
Cellist was really good! The rest sounded quite painful though.
Stapler78 4 years ago
That's what most people say when they listen to a cellist - the violins sound sharp
andrew9994 4 years ago
Yeah, but this celist in particular had a nice mellow tone, and a steady rhythm. The 1st and 2nd violins seemed to be fighting to be heard more clearly. It's a quartet, man. We can hear you. Making it was just poor miking.
Stapler78 4 years ago
good job, i luv it ^^
tesoritopr 4 years ago
Very well done, but more people playing would complement the sound. Case in point, the cellist sounds great but that is the 1st cello part only (I'm a cellist originally). It sounds really spectacular with at least 2 cellos, 2 violas, 3 violins. I played this back in HS in 1996, and I now teach music in HS. I showed this to my class so they could see what we hope to sound like eventually... Beautiful however nonetheless...
cdimetr 4 years ago
My middle school (New Jersey) played this as well.
Though it sounds very nice when played in a quartet I prefer it not to be played in one(we played it in a small chamber orchestra) This is because as you know there are separate parts from the three soloists (sadly only a cello, and 2 violins, I was sad about no viola solo also) When played in a bigger group it sounds like the soloists and the rest of the players are constantly replying to each other, as well as complementing each other)
Hal243Music 4 years ago
well he was right this is really shitty without other people i play this with seronata and it sounds much better, just that individual noises like bow strokes etc. plays out really loud.
TopGunMan 4 years ago
My teacher says you cant do this piece with a quartet. well, this just proves him wrong. kudos.
Azerein 4 years ago
i am from sosnowa musicial school from Łódź(Poland)You're great.i'm playing corelli with my orchestra lodzkie smyczki.i love this concert;D
kleikryzowy 4 years ago
how good do i have to be to get into musical school? i need to have played for like 5 years or something to get in? :O
boogeymaner 4 years ago
no u just need to play well
Rexl12 4 years ago
Really is orgasmic music
andrew9994 4 years ago 2
omg i kno!
tesoritopr 4 years ago
i'm playing this song with my orchestra from school. Now I have a good example of what it sounds like, and I can practice with this. TY
nejitheprodigy 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Witches!
essejj 4 years ago
what??
alicelizard 4 years ago
Bravissimo!!! :)
frphilipmullen 4 years ago
One of my very favorites!! What a stunning job you do!
barbkaus 4 years ago
Wow that was spectacular my favourite corelli piece, i would love to hear you do the overture to handels messiah, now that is an artisitic piece of work.
Gearoid2006 4 years ago
the slow part maybe, but at that time, boroque period there was no spicatto at all because the shape of the bow, yes it is true that they play with short strokes, but not spicatto
jonaestrada 4 years ago
Baroque music is characteristic of martele eighth notes, but deteche sixteenth notes. So as far as I know, I think they played very close to a baroque performance - all they would need now are gut strings, curved bows, and no chin or shoulder rests.
chefportnen 4 years ago
Good performance, the only thing is that instead of playing stacatto, they would've played martele to imitate the barroque sound, well, thats mi opinion
jonaestrada 4 years ago
I'm loving the suspensions in the Allegro.
chefportnen 4 years ago
ah i loved it! our orchestra played it last year for regionals & were invited to nationals - its such a beautiful song
sarahlis 4 years ago
i am extremely impressed! excellent job..I played this in orchestra a while ago and would have never thought it would sound this great in a quartet (especially with a missing secondary cello part, etc). But this is an amazing performance, and I am actually thinking of introducing this piece to my little high school quartet. And I love the vibrato btw unlike others
shloomper 4 years ago
Very good
Ziggy1614 4 years ago
What a wonderful performance. Despite what the critics say, I am very pleased by what I have just heard from this quartet. And to the critics, Can you do any better?
Member108 4 years ago
A lot of criticism about the vibrato here ? Should they also play on period instruments and use gut strings as well ? Oh, and no chin rests or shoulder rests either.
It was well done. Music is a matter of interpretation by the artist.
brian777999 4 years ago
Utter nonsence the comments on to much tempo, vibrato, emotion! Music IS emotion therefor there is no such thing as to much of it. A tone has to have a bit of vibrato otherwise it is lifeless. And it doesn't matter how fast you are telling a story.
Monrealese 4 years ago
O barroco é de uma vivacidade incrivel! Belissimooooooo!
essenciademusica 4 years ago
Beautifully played. I've never played this as a quartet before, always been with slightly larger chamber orchestras. Amazing tone, dynamics and interpretation - less vibrato would be my only criticism, other wise - just as Corelli intended!! Keep up the good work.
elkeitel 4 years ago
One of my absolute favorites!!! Great job!
barbkaus 4 years ago
I suggest you play with a little less vibrato. This is after all a baroque piece and should be played with a bit more restraint and perhaps a bit more swiftly
firebreathone 4 years ago
Good Cello... Kept up well with that crazy tempo
Celliguy300 4 years ago
I take that back... Thats a really slow tempo
Celliguy300 4 years ago
You are all wonderful!
fourthchairviolin 4 years ago
corelli!!! the girliest of the italians
dartz07 4 years ago
nevermind, there's madeline.
roloviolasymphony 4 years ago
beautiful vibrato :) are there any violas? if not, :( cause i'm a viola player...
roloviolasymphony 4 years ago
O my God these is not a baroque piece, more study and less vibrato please.
pernaleteluis 4 years ago
i agree!!! you are absolutly right
hpwratvr18 4 years ago
you're both idiots.
BrainDecrease 4 years ago
i agree with brain decrease.
baroque pieces have LESS vibrato. Hence, they use more vibrato because this isn't really a baroque.
theimmaculate 4 years ago
Don't misunderstand, it's baroque and shouldnt really have vibrato, but these girls arent exactly pros. Theyre just some hillbillies playing nice music. Theres no need to nitpick is all.
BrainDecrease 4 years ago
Who told you that Baroque pieces don't have vibrato? They always do have some, otherwise they'd be really boring to listen to. However, the vibrato used in Baroque pieces (slower movements with the fingers) should be different from the one you'd use for Classical or Romantic pieces (more "nervous" like movements).
Anyway, I think this was an awesome performance. Well done!
anafram 4 years ago 2
I'm sure the pieces you've heard do have it lol. Enthusiasts, though, know that vibrato is a modern form of expression, not really used in the baroque era. In professional baroque performances, true to the period, vibrato isnt used at all.
BrainDecrease 4 years ago
Un ensamble magnífico, y el sonido, estupendo, muchas gracias!!!
friendlybarman 4 years ago
Corelli's not dead! wahhhhhhhhhhhhh
monkeys55 4 years ago
Beautiful !! =) the cello part of this concert is amazing !! =)
AhmedHZ 4 years ago
the cello player is sexy...corelli would also have thought so...
ikaeriotis 4 years ago
the girl seatting in front of her is sexiest, for me and Corelli too
friendlybarman 4 years ago
Sublime music work
TrentDylan 4 years ago
Verry nice. I played this a few years ago. Except with 2 basses playing the 2 cello parts, 2 violins, and a viola.
mcnaire2004 4 years ago
These ladies did a nice job. I would suggest a little less vibrato in the opening movement. My favorite recording of this is from Naxos. I was just talking to my teacher the other day about vibrato when playing baroque music. He said that back then vibrato was used "cosmetically" in a similar way that people would wear makeup. If you use vibrato very often in baroque music, then it's like you've smeared lipstick all over your face.
bryan21tx 4 years ago
This does not sound baroque at all.
I dont think Corelli would have wanted it to sound like this.
firebreathone 5 years ago
Who cares what Corelli would have wanted. He's dead. Play the music any way you want. Your the performer. Do what you think is right. If you want to play it Baroque like Corelli would have wanted, great. If you want to do something a different go ahead. If everyone played this music the same, it would become boring and dull. I'm personally a traditionalist and I think Baroque should be played Baroque, but you're the performer. You choose.
HaMoOhAhA 4 years ago
i agree with violabrain, the musician should be the one to say how much emotion they are going to put into the music, not the way people have played it before.
bowmanator5 5 years ago
hey guys...it sounds great...but i agree with Stairway, way too much emotion...the allegro for example...the first and second violon should sound like one violon...but the way you guys played it...i could tell the violons apart...it sounds great but for those who know how correli plays lol will give you a correct critique...nice job though
sokdiddy 5 years ago
isn't interpretation up to the performers
violabrain 5 years ago
jekelbro98765 is totally right.
HaMoOhAhA 5 years ago
I did not know that Corelli was such a brilliant composer... and Vivaldi really followed after his teacher.
768111 5 years ago
Well, Corelli pioneered the art of violin playing and brought to a whole new level, and Vivaldi brought it to an even higher one
HaMoOhAhA 5 years ago
A veces suenan cosas muy buenas, otras sin embargo no, deben estudiar un poco mas la afinación y la conducción de las ideas musicales. Más allá de todo buen trabajo! Saludos de Buenos Aires, un colega violista.
bernardoviolista 5 years ago
Thank you - beautiful!
olivedrag 5 years ago
when the cello starts at : 4:16 that for the cello is not staccato.
It is weey beautifool
pbaron23 5 years ago
not staccato but baroque style of music.correct?
jekelbro98765 5 years ago
yes. corelli was a baroque composer.
768111 5 years ago
Then the cello is baroque and the style should stay the same and not be played legato like pbaron23 stated
jekelbro98765 5 years ago
YES. The idiot that said that is an idiot. Lol. There are some people that claim baroque music should be played with emotion. It shouldn't and I am glad there are people on youtube that understand this like you. GO YOU!
768111 5 years ago
lol, i agree that all music should be played with some emotion, but emotion can be different for a different style, thats like saying you would like to play beethoven on a harpsichord, HAHAHAHAH
jekelbro98765 5 years ago
LOL!
768111 5 years ago
Why shouldn't Baroque music be played with emotion? It sounds good doesn't it? Besides, all great art is open for interpretation. If Baroque music is played without emotion all the time then it becomes dull and boring, and people forget about it.
HaMoOhAhA 5 years ago
True... but it isn't meant to be played like a romantic piece. I mean... emotion is essential in music but what I'm saying is that baroque is a different style that requires little emotion compared to the romantic era.
HLMadeInCorea 5 years ago
I know what you mean, but there are some romanticised versions of Baroque peices that sound spectacular. Search up four seasons karajan here on youtube and you'll see what I mean.
HaMoOhAhA 5 years ago
768111 you dont understand music at all. emotionless music my ass!! Shut the f*ck up you make me angry!
Monrealese 4 years ago
Beautiful...passionate! Thank you!
Snarkymom 5 years ago
Yeah my orchestra just started playing this today we've only gotten to the Adagio, but it's such a fun song to play isn't it? You guys did an amazing job at making it sound beautiful :)
sarahlis 5 years ago
WHOAA my quartet is playing this too!! i have this jawn in my folder. gen is so much better than me lol.
marukasu 5 years ago