I agree. The Seekers are superior to PPM, Kingston Trio, Brothers 4, We Five. They had great songs and Judith Durham is one of the great female folksingers of all time and very attractive. Another good version of this song is the Peter & Gordon version. My fave version is probably Bobby Bare.
This is the song that tuck me to bed when i was a child. My mom use to sing this to me. And when i was away from home, I listen to this song, and get's me upset and home sick. I love you mom. Judith you voice always helps to calm me down and relaxes me. The Seekers,. Simply AWESOME!
I have read many comments about the quality of MS Durhamm's voice. For positive comments, I certainly agree. I don't think it is noticed much, because for her it was so effortless, but she has an incredible range. This song shows it very well. Also, when the boys hit the harmony with her, it is a unique and peerless sound. This is part of why they are loved by so many of us with good musical taste.
I find it childish and disgusting that some misguided people find it necessary to turn a musical composition into a competition. The Seekers interpretation of this classic song is just as valid as any other artists version. Judith Durham's voice is superb and lends a haunting quality to this song. Those who want to criticize because they don't like this version of the song are being immature and foolish. It's NOT a competition, it's the expression of a musical idea. Grow up!
If you don't like something, say nothing. This version was one of the best. Especclailly Judith with her voice. It is such a shame that people really do not know what they are sayng, and/or hearing.
PP&M jumped on the '60s protest bandwagon, The Seekers did not. And that made all the difference. PP&M got the worship treatment, The Seekers did not. Truth is The Seekers leave PP&M in the dust and Mary Travers can't touch Judith Durham. That said, that we are comparing two such wonderful groups is all the testimony the 1960s music scene could ask for. What a decade.
Both groups were wonderful. The seekers brought joyous, beautiful & socially aware songs (I'd like to teach the world to sing...) romantic (e.g. I know I'll never find another you--sung at my wedding in 2004--good stuff!) But I don't know (hopefully my Australian friends will educate me--not flame me--Peter, Paul and Mary Marched on Washington, Marched with MLK and lent their presence and performances to peace & social justice in ways that the seekers didn't. I won't choose between them.
Both groups were wonderful. The seekers brought joyous, beautiful & socially aware songs (I'd like to teach the world to sing...) romantic (e.g. I know I'll never find another you--sung at my wedding in 2004--good stuff!) But I don't know (hopefully my Australian friends will educate me--not flame me--Peter, Paul and Mary Marched on Washington, Marched with MLK and lent their presence and performances to peace & social justice in ways that the seekers didn't. I jwon't choose between them.
@daveymars I maybe wrong with this, but I think The Seekers were more about presenting the song. Whereas the likes of Peter, Paul and Mary, Joan Baez, etc, were more about the message
that's true, we should try to enjoy all the different renditions of this same song, the same song sang by the same singer at different location and different time of their lives may also varies in tune and sometimes tempo too.
for u guys who may like the similar kind of songs- if you dont mind, let me introduce to you, "blowing in the wind" n "where have all the flowers gone", try it, hope u guys will like that, happy listening, thanks to YouTube, its has brought to me, much happiness.
Outstanding! The way she uses high vocal notes for this song is absolutely amazing. It gives the song a whole different feel, and redefines somewhat the spirit of the lyrics. The arrangement is superb, not exploitative or lazy at all. The Seekers are completely underrated.
You're right, QR, I humbly stand corrected in my wrongs.
I'm a person who survived the 1980's as a backup musician for successful bands, And one of my Peeves of the 80's Was the tendency we had to condemn what didn't instantaneously spark our interest. I apologize for my over reaction.
Yeah, well, there's a real difference between "cool" and "wonderful". That's alright, though. I'm sure there are other people out there who don't know how to appreciate real music and can't help but to open up their trap to say something rude.
Being an American, I have to add my two cents to the earlier discussions: Although I like Peter, Paul and Mary, they are not on the same high, elite level as The Seekers. Apparently some have never heard a lady sing in a soprano voice before - it's flawless and uplifting once you get used to it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't think the seekers are even close to being better than Peter Paul & Mary. I cringe when I here that high pitched voice at the begining of this song, it's just awful.
In true Christmas panto style, "Oh no it isn't" lol.
Even if this song doesn't float your boat though, their rich and varied repertoire is far superior to Peter Paul and Mary. Tom Springfields writing ensured that. I don't think P P and M had any songs as good as The Carnival Is Over or I'll Never Find Another You or Georgie Girl, and thats despite Bob Dylan and John Denver writing their songs.
@Dyynamo Except Tom Springfield didn't write the tune to The Carnival Is Over. He borrowed it from an old Russian folk song, Stenka Razin. Apart from that I agree he produced excellent stuff quite uniquely tailored to The Seekers talents.
@Dyynamo That is just BS--although I like the Seekers-this version cannot touch the one of Peter, Paul, and Mary. Right-even though Bob Dylan and John Denver were writing their songs. GTFREAKOUT
Peter Paul and Mary aren't anywhere near the quality of the Seekers and Judith Durham's voice is just as perfect today as she was in the 60's. You're in a very small minority thinking the way you do
@theboze1959 . I personally love, but I have found that a lot of people are unsure the 1st time they hear it , as it isn't what they normally expect for the song or from Judith . My wife had the same view, but after several listenings it she came to like it. I think it is one of those versions that grow on you the more you hear it
@theboze1959 I like both the Seekers and the Peter Paul and Mary versions of this song, but Judith Durham's voice is haunting beautiful. An,d it fair to say that when it comes to judging voices, the only taste you have is located in your mouth.
@theboze1959 All I ask myself after reading your comment is...how many times have you come back to this "awful" song with something to say? It's nice to know that you have such an opinion...and it's very possible that other people may agree with you...but that is why they are elsewhere listening to those songs. Go join them ;)
I do not know much about The seekers,but this is great song,it tune is great its fesinates the listner. This tune has been copied by indian musicians, they often do this they are habitual.
To my Aussie friends ..... Were the Seekers on par with Peter Paul and Mary? Or where they far ahead.? Being a 60's child, I think you folks had the better group.
@Dyynamo I'm an American, and I will back your opinion 100%. I greatly appreciate most versions of this song. There have been many great groups & singers over the years and I do not like to say one is "better" than the other.
However I will say that the Seekers are THE most flawlessly perfect group I have ever heard. These four remarkable Aussies seem to always be at their best and I cannot help but be drawn to that unique and superb Seekers sound.
@gto66solstice08 Where this particular song is concerned, I feel that PP & M did a better job. But.....one cannot deny Judith's beautiful voice and The Seekers harmonising in most of their tunes. They are still brilliant!!
@gto66solstice08 I think the problem was the Seekers didn't have a very pro-active producer/manager or maybe they just thought a few hits were good enough. Peter Paul & Mary made a gazillion songs & alot more exposure. So I think it was all in the handlers. I personally like Judith voice, it's like an angel's. So sweet, pure & clear. But I also loved Puff the Magic Dragon & I Dig Rock & Roll Music, so both groups had their forte's.
@gto66solstice08 I think the problem was the Seekers didn't have a very pro-active producer/manager or maybe they just thought a few hits were good enough. Peter Paul & Mary made a gazillion songs & alot more exposure. So I think it was all in the handlers. I personally like Judith voice, it's like an angel's. So sweet, pure & clear. But I also loved Puff the Magic Dragon & Leavin' on a Jet Plane, so both groups had their forte's.
Absolutely awesome. You just can not get music like this today. We as a society have lost the qualities of magic and harmony. Listen to judiths voice , it sings by it's self. Beautiful.
So many good versions of "500 Miles", that I don't want to disrespect any version by saying one version is better than another.
This version by the Seekers IS particularly haunting and memorable though, and has that typical Seekers' magic of flawless instrumentals and perfect harmony to Judith Durham's pitch-perfect voice. Definitely one of the top versions.
The PP&M and Bobby Bare versions also grab my attention too.
The best vocalist to sing this classic song; although if I were producing the song, I would incorporate some of the verses Bobby Bare does in his version--THEY explain the song while the "shorter" version by the Seekers, Peter Paul and Mary, the Brothers Four, etc. leave the rationale of the song vague.
And while we are praising Judith let us not forget... in the days when this album was recorded there was no auto-tune, no chorus FX, no harmonizers, and multitrack was in its infancy. Thus she is singing "dry" (nothing but vocal chords and a mic) and in all liklihood this track was recorded live in studio - no overdubs. Impressive, no??
@cereeal1 The seekers are just as good today as the first time I heard then in the mid 1960's Thank God they are still working together on special occasions. I would like to know how their concert tour was in October with Andre Rieu???
Does anyone else see the massive resemblance between this song and bobby bares 500 miles... almost the same tune just a mild variation of the words... now which is better is the question... but id probably say this one is!
it was likely the other way around. Bobby Bare released his version in 63, the Seekers, my favorite mixed group of all time came out with this version of 500 miles in 64. Bobby is credited with rewriting the words of a very old mountain song......900 miles......others say it was Hedy West.....
And Peter Paul and Mary likely had the biggest hit..... The seekers really likeed PP&M so maybe.......
@LittleJimmySouthern Jimmy's right. The whole point about folk songs is they weren't sung by horses, and the lyrics continue to change. Bobby Bare's version is so different, but just as good.
Great point about "Folk Music" - Music of the "Folk" as apposed to music of Jack or Jill. Folk music has the connotation of belonging to the people because it is from the people. There was a special time when the generation of that time embraced the values of folk music as apposed to commercial music. It is sad to me that such values were shouted out in short order. Shouted out, but never lost.
This one and the Kingston Trio's version are my favorite ones.
lobo81865 1 month ago
Judith's voice is so amazing,I really like this version,But love both versions !
Nightowl631 2 months ago
beautiful voice
1billion1deaths1 2 months ago
Judith's voice is one of the best ever. What a class act she has been. The Seekers were one of the best groups ever.
skooterbud05 3 months ago
What a voice!
rws1515 3 months ago
still great
read FIRST LOVE written by PETRA MARIA SCHEID
at amazon com
keep on dreamin
Tageshoroskop 3 months ago
beautiful voice..............
passion2221 3 months ago
Peter Paul and Mary were great, but they were a step behind The Seekers,Their song are so clear
sixnightsaweek 3 months ago 2
This is awesome, I love Clint Eastwood and General Saint's Stop That Train didn't realise where it came from
steve62afc 4 months ago
Damn, I was looking for the proclaimer's song.
Cleo4696 4 months ago
PPM、キングストントリオとは違った感じだけどいいです。63歳仙台在住
tadatoshi2326 4 months ago
God I love this version by Judith. What range and in-your-soul presence.
fredlunau 4 months ago
This was perfection.Her haunting voice and the back up.Just perfect
VIETNAMVET864 4 months ago 2
I agree. The Seekers are superior to PPM, Kingston Trio, Brothers 4, We Five. They had great songs and Judith Durham is one of the great female folksingers of all time and very attractive. Another good version of this song is the Peter & Gordon version. My fave version is probably Bobby Bare.
sleepypie 4 months ago
I'm American. The Seekers are far better than the versions by American seekers.
AnotherCuppaCoffee 5 months ago
This is the song that tuck me to bed when i was a child. My mom use to sing this to me. And when i was away from home, I listen to this song, and get's me upset and home sick. I love you mom. Judith you voice always helps to calm me down and relaxes me. The Seekers,. Simply AWESOME!
alkazapper 5 months ago
I have read many comments about the quality of MS Durhamm's voice. For positive comments, I certainly agree. I don't think it is noticed much, because for her it was so effortless, but she has an incredible range. This song shows it very well. Also, when the boys hit the harmony with her, it is a unique and peerless sound. This is part of why they are loved by so many of us with good musical taste.
wmden1 6 months ago 4
I find it childish and disgusting that some misguided people find it necessary to turn a musical composition into a competition. The Seekers interpretation of this classic song is just as valid as any other artists version. Judith Durham's voice is superb and lends a haunting quality to this song. Those who want to criticize because they don't like this version of the song are being immature and foolish. It's NOT a competition, it's the expression of a musical idea. Grow up!
dougalmac54 6 months ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Awfullllll!!! Spoiled the taste of the original song!!! This is NOT expected. Please stop singing....
shantonov21 6 months ago
there getting ready to roll the sailer on the album cover.it was military payday back when this picture was taken.
SIGNALSTAT 6 months ago
If you don't like something, say nothing. This version was one of the best. Especclailly Judith with her voice. It is such a shame that people really do not know what they are sayng, and/or hearing.
jlbruno4433 7 months ago 2
I think this a blokes song, and has more meaning sung by such, do like the seekers though....pity they were aussies ))
DrShittyBottomHammer 7 months ago
haunting and sorrowful... beautifuk too
MrBuckwilliam 7 months ago
Beautiful, just beautiful.
lionssong2525 8 months ago
So very beautiful!
Pedy1968 8 months ago
my moms favorite song love her and miss you Mom. xxx RIP you have earned it> Tommy
folger5 8 months ago
what a voice!!
aparensis 9 months ago
Hey gunnari14, if being an Australian or an Australian in the 60's and loving this group is gay then yes I'll proudly be gay.
1939PlymouthRatRod 9 months ago
@1939PlymouthRatRod The Journeymen - 500 miles was much better, also they didnt made this song,
keeperoftheforest 7 months ago
lovely version of this song
jbibb66 9 months ago
Super song with a super group! Thanks for posting this timeless treasure!
lionssong2525 9 months ago
Oh man , das is ne tolles lied , weils mich an mein cousin erinnert :(
Er hat es mir mit 7 aufn keyboard beigebracht und ehm ja das wird es niewieder geben :(
Er hat sich zu stark verändert :(:(
MorpheusMatrix2010 9 months ago
PP&M jumped on the '60s protest bandwagon, The Seekers did not. And that made all the difference. PP&M got the worship treatment, The Seekers did not. Truth is The Seekers leave PP&M in the dust and Mary Travers can't touch Judith Durham. That said, that we are comparing two such wonderful groups is all the testimony the 1960s music scene could ask for. What a decade.
grangeender1 10 months ago 2
I am Danish so i don't have to be neutral. The seekers were the best and still is from my point of wiev.
erikbur 11 months ago
I don't know why but every time I listen to this song, I just have to bust out a "gangsta" rap song next...........
blabblab1212 11 months ago
Both groups were wonderful. The seekers brought joyous, beautiful & socially aware songs (I'd like to teach the world to sing...) romantic (e.g. I know I'll never find another you--sung at my wedding in 2004--good stuff!) But I don't know (hopefully my Australian friends will educate me--not flame me--Peter, Paul and Mary Marched on Washington, Marched with MLK and lent their presence and performances to peace & social justice in ways that the seekers didn't. I won't choose between them.
daveymars 11 months ago
Both groups were wonderful. The seekers brought joyous, beautiful & socially aware songs (I'd like to teach the world to sing...) romantic (e.g. I know I'll never find another you--sung at my wedding in 2004--good stuff!) But I don't know (hopefully my Australian friends will educate me--not flame me--Peter, Paul and Mary Marched on Washington, Marched with MLK and lent their presence and performances to peace & social justice in ways that the seekers didn't. I jwon't choose between them.
daveymars 11 months ago
@daveymars I maybe wrong with this, but I think The Seekers were more about presenting the song. Whereas the likes of Peter, Paul and Mary, Joan Baez, etc, were more about the message
wasslic 11 months ago
that's true, we should try to enjoy all the different renditions of this same song, the same song sang by the same singer at different location and different time of their lives may also varies in tune and sometimes tempo too.
for u guys who may like the similar kind of songs- if you dont mind, let me introduce to you, "blowing in the wind" n "where have all the flowers gone", try it, hope u guys will like that, happy listening, thanks to YouTube, its has brought to me, much happiness.
reaganong 11 months ago
This is a beautiful version. PP&M did a great version also. Why argue about which is better, enjoy the one you love.
Bobk857 1 year ago 2
There is no female voice like Judith Durham on the planet.....just take some time to listen to that clarity and style.
bazthehandyman 1 year ago 2
Indeed, may God continue to bless and keep her...a wonderful woman.
dumboldon 1 year ago 2
ich hoffe mal der eine da hat sich nur verklickt ;)
Kieselstein14 1 year ago
Grab the audio from this clip at tubepull doht cohm.
MarylinDogon819 1 year ago
I think that each group did the song differently, neither one is any better than the other, just different and both beautiful.
Bobk857 1 year ago 2
I had forgotten how hauntingly beautiful the Seekers did this song. Judith's voice in this song ANGELIC.Thank-you for sharing your video with me.
12Daniel7 1 year ago
Me gustan las dos versiones pero la voz de Judith Durham hace la diferencia.
medicoenamorado 1 year ago
Outstanding! The way she uses high vocal notes for this song is absolutely amazing. It gives the song a whole different feel, and redefines somewhat the spirit of the lyrics. The arrangement is superb, not exploitative or lazy at all. The Seekers are completely underrated.
shazzaCM 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
its so hard to find that cool 500 miles song from youtube, theres so many of them, all I find are gay songs like this.
gunnari14 1 year ago
@gunnari14
Aw bless.
Dyynamo 1 year ago 9
@Dyynamo You i think you hold the record for the least liked comment on youtube.
shikatema4 10 months ago 2
@shikatema4 I think you'll find that its Gunnari's comment that has all the negative votes. My comment stands at +3 at the present time. :-)
Dyynamo 10 months ago 3
@gunnari14
Judging by you're attitude and vocabulary, You must be a fan of 80's rock.
The reason you can't find the song you're most likely looking for, is because it's name is actually
"I'm Gonna Be" By The Proclaimers.
Just because it says "500 miles" over and over again in the song, doesn't mean it's the name of the song.
And just because you didn't find the song you're looking for doesn't mean you have to insult the music others like. That is called common courtesy..
ifixmixers 10 months ago
@ifixmixers just opening my mind man. you dont have to write a goddamn book to comment my oppinion
gunnari14 10 months ago
@ifixmixers
Just because gunnari14 made the comment he did, doesn't mean you have to tar all fans of 80's rock with the same brush.
That is called common curteousy.
QueenReigns1 10 months ago
@QueenReigns1
You're right, QR, I humbly stand corrected in my wrongs.
I'm a person who survived the 1980's as a backup musician for successful bands, And one of my Peeves of the 80's Was the tendency we had to condemn what didn't instantaneously spark our interest. I apologize for my over reaction.
ifixmixers 10 months ago
@gunnari14 try searching for the proclaimers .. I think that's the song you want to find ;-) enjoy.
TICETOCAR 10 months ago
@gunnari14 The Journeymen - 500 miles
Real men singing..... not a girl
seriouly listen to it, far better from all version
keeperoftheforest 7 months ago
@gunnari1 friggin DS....
1955emerald 6 months ago
Yeah, well, there's a real difference between "cool" and "wonderful". That's alright, though. I'm sure there are other people out there who don't know how to appreciate real music and can't help but to open up their trap to say something rude.
MissIzzzyB 3 months ago
Comment removed
FuckSkins1 2 months ago
Being an American, I have to add my two cents to the earlier discussions: Although I like Peter, Paul and Mary, they are not on the same high, elite level as The Seekers. Apparently some have never heard a lady sing in a soprano voice before - it's flawless and uplifting once you get used to it.
misterdakman 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't think the seekers are even close to being better than Peter Paul & Mary. I cringe when I here that high pitched voice at the begining of this song, it's just awful.
theboze1959 1 year ago
@theboze1959
In true Christmas panto style, "Oh no it isn't" lol.
Even if this song doesn't float your boat though, their rich and varied repertoire is far superior to Peter Paul and Mary. Tom Springfields writing ensured that. I don't think P P and M had any songs as good as The Carnival Is Over or I'll Never Find Another You or Georgie Girl, and thats despite Bob Dylan and John Denver writing their songs.
Dyynamo 1 year ago 4
@Dyynamo Except Tom Springfield didn't write the tune to The Carnival Is Over. He borrowed it from an old Russian folk song, Stenka Razin. Apart from that I agree he produced excellent stuff quite uniquely tailored to The Seekers talents.
penrhyndeundraeth 10 months ago
@Dyynamo That is just BS--although I like the Seekers-this version cannot touch the one of Peter, Paul, and Mary. Right-even though Bob Dylan and John Denver were writing their songs. GTFREAKOUT
RPenta 4 months ago
@theboze1959
Peter Paul and Mary aren't anywhere near the quality of the Seekers and Judith Durham's voice is just as perfect today as she was in the 60's. You're in a very small minority thinking the way you do
canstanley 1 year ago
@thebozo1959 You're a tool... with no appreciation for the superior vocal skills of Judy Durham
Gederic1 1 year ago
@theboze1959 . I personally love, but I have found that a lot of people are unsure the 1st time they hear it , as it isn't what they normally expect for the song or from Judith . My wife had the same view, but after several listenings it she came to like it. I think it is one of those versions that grow on you the more you hear it
wasslic 1 year ago
@theboze1959 I like both the Seekers and the Peter Paul and Mary versions of this song, but Judith Durham's voice is haunting beautiful. An,d it fair to say that when it comes to judging voices, the only taste you have is located in your mouth.
rrclerk68 4 months ago
@theboze1959 All I ask myself after reading your comment is...how many times have you come back to this "awful" song with something to say? It's nice to know that you have such an opinion...and it's very possible that other people may agree with you...but that is why they are elsewhere listening to those songs. Go join them ;)
MissIzzzyB 3 months ago
Voice of an angel. Brings tears to my eyes.
Theolesaltydawg 1 year ago
I'm a 60's Queenslander and this is sheer magic - I remember watching them on an old Astor tele - thank god their music is still around.
MrPoorboy1958 1 year ago
I do not know much about The seekers,but this is great song,it tune is great its fesinates the listner. This tune has been copied by indian musicians, they often do this they are habitual.
ali123456732 1 year ago
To my Aussie friends ..... Were the Seekers on par with Peter Paul and Mary? Or where they far ahead.? Being a 60's child, I think you folks had the better group.
gto66solstice08 1 year ago 5
@gto66solstice08
I'm a Brit so I'm neutral here. I think The Seekers were streets ahead or Peter Paul and Mary.
Dyynamo 1 year ago 12
@Dyynamo Thumbs up just for using "streets ahead"
depaysment 10 months ago
@Dyynamo Thumbs up just for using "streets ahead"
depaysment 10 months ago
@Dyynamo I'm an American, and I will back your opinion 100%. I greatly appreciate most versions of this song. There have been many great groups & singers over the years and I do not like to say one is "better" than the other.
However I will say that the Seekers are THE most flawlessly perfect group I have ever heard. These four remarkable Aussies seem to always be at their best and I cannot help but be drawn to that unique and superb Seekers sound.
coltperc 4 months ago 2
@gto66solstice08 Where this particular song is concerned, I feel that PP & M did a better job. But.....one cannot deny Judith's beautiful voice and The Seekers harmonising in most of their tunes. They are still brilliant!!
stratamanager 1 year ago 2
@gto66solstice08
stratamanager 1 year ago
@gto66solstice08 I think the problem was the Seekers didn't have a very pro-active producer/manager or maybe they just thought a few hits were good enough. Peter Paul & Mary made a gazillion songs & alot more exposure. So I think it was all in the handlers. I personally like Judith voice, it's like an angel's. So sweet, pure & clear. But I also loved Puff the Magic Dragon & I Dig Rock & Roll Music, so both groups had their forte's.
StevieB1362 10 months ago
@gto66solstice08 I think the problem was the Seekers didn't have a very pro-active producer/manager or maybe they just thought a few hits were good enough. Peter Paul & Mary made a gazillion songs & alot more exposure. So I think it was all in the handlers. I personally like Judith voice, it's like an angel's. So sweet, pure & clear. But I also loved Puff the Magic Dragon & Leavin' on a Jet Plane, so both groups had their forte's.
StevieB1362 10 months ago
@gto66solstice08 close contest but I think the Seekers edge it. Judith's voice is quality
342cga 10 months ago
Jerryig62 You are right!
ConnieRadbone 1 year ago
Absolutely awesome. You just can not get music like this today. We as a society have lost the qualities of magic and harmony. Listen to judiths voice , it sings by it's self. Beautiful.
ljhooker234 1 year ago
Probably the best version of this song. The Seekers secret is that the boys provided a strong platform from which Judith soared.
ConnieRadbone 1 year ago
@ConnieRadbone I agree and this song has many great versions!
Jerryjg62 1 year ago
The Seekers are amazing.
Judith has a GREAT voice.
Thank you for posting this wonderful song.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 year ago
Great song.
Thank you for posting.
Thumbed!
TunesNorth 1 year ago
What a voice she has!
brownindian17 1 year ago
So many good versions of "500 Miles", that I don't want to disrespect any version by saying one version is better than another.
This version by the Seekers IS particularly haunting and memorable though, and has that typical Seekers' magic of flawless instrumentals and perfect harmony to Judith Durham's pitch-perfect voice. Definitely one of the top versions.
The PP&M and Bobby Bare versions also grab my attention too.
63DW89A 1 year ago
@63DW89A I agree the Bobby Bare version is excellent
rosebud7158 1 year ago
SIMPLY WONDERFUL MUSIC AND VOICES
tjay2323 1 year ago
The best vocalist to sing this classic song; although if I were producing the song, I would incorporate some of the verses Bobby Bare does in his version--THEY explain the song while the "shorter" version by the Seekers, Peter Paul and Mary, the Brothers Four, etc. leave the rationale of the song vague.
RPenta 1 year ago
Surprisingly good, even if I still prefer Peter, Paul and Mary singing this.
It is really worth comparing the two versions
slowfoodwawa 1 year ago
i love this song and my Grandpa loves this song. it represents his life in so many ways
Moonmourner 1 year ago
Think it you sang it wrong Judith its not like opara.
Your softer voice it would have been really good.
ajay999999 1 year ago
^0^...
Wornout100 1 year ago
Perfect rendition of a beautiful, haunting song.
FRANKIESIXTOES 1 year ago 2
This is the best voice I've ever heard for this song!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MichaelSansone1948 1 year ago 3
She has such a great voice.
tenorismo 1 year ago 2
I love the Seekers. but please keep religion out of it @neotronic.
People like me don't want to read this shit.
59whiterabbit 1 year ago
@59whiterabbit whats wrong with "Gold Bless...
GunaMalaysia 1 year ago
@59whiterabbit Yeah I think he was being jokingly religious, man.
Priortobriar 1 year ago
i think peter and gordon sing it better but she is a great singer and it's good
martinsiro 1 year ago
great!!!!!!!!
NiePijMlekaKrowy 1 year ago
Five Hundred Smiles
bumperu 1 year ago
Mary Travers sounded better singing this song, but The Seekers are still amazing.
holden415 1 year ago
The beautiful voices touched. Thank you from the sky in Japan
ryusi12 1 year ago
this version is so beautiful and moving that it makes the strongest of men weep
sampson1959 1 year ago
No one can reach those high notes like Miss Durham
MikeHudson65 1 year ago
Aussie foreva.
vincentlhh 1 year ago
All praise to the GODDESS Judith !!!!!!!!
hennagaijin100 1 year ago 3
Wow!
davidmayne 1 year ago
And while we are praising Judith let us not forget... in the days when this album was recorded there was no auto-tune, no chorus FX, no harmonizers, and multitrack was in its infancy. Thus she is singing "dry" (nothing but vocal chords and a mic) and in all liklihood this track was recorded live in studio - no overdubs. Impressive, no??
sootikins 1 year ago 4
Is the lead singer a nun? The nuns in my high school sang like this.
brotherjohn25 1 year ago
all the best
sukiypk 1 year ago
If you believe there are words to describe pure beauty, they apply here.
Others like Joan Baez can do as well.
No one can do better.
Escal21 1 year ago
Wow!!! que linda voz tiene esta cantante!!!! 5*****
mylluy 1 year ago
Great cover, Judith lifts this track to another level. Bring back The Seekers!
smoothmicra 1 year ago 4
yeah.
sayyes2bull 1 year ago
awesome song!
nGwr 1 year ago
Judith's beautiful soprano voice is amazing here - listen to her voice!
grimTales1 2 years ago 7
I agree with the other posters that this version is tops, and Judith's high vocals just take it up and out of this world into another realm.
misterdakman 2 years ago 16
Haunting is the word
boysnips 2 years ago 9
So many people covered this song & did a good job. My 2 personal favorite versions were Mary Travers & Hoyt Axton.
999Atwood 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT??? sounds like in church x)
YodasBrotherNo1 2 years ago
Judith Durham such an amazing singer - still great in 2009 - by far the best version of this song!
northerngreywolf 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is good, but prefer joan baez version
c64c64c64 2 years ago
Judith is an amazing singer!!!!!!!!!!
cereeal1 2 years ago 41
@cereeal1 The seekers are just as good today as the first time I heard then in the mid 1960's Thank God they are still working together on special occasions. I would like to know how their concert tour was in October with Andre Rieu???
sixtiesforever1966 1 year ago
brilliant song
shoulinsaturn06 2 years ago 7
Does anyone else see the massive resemblance between this song and bobby bares 500 miles... almost the same tune just a mild variation of the words... now which is better is the question... but id probably say this one is!
RainbowSix1984 2 years ago
I'm guessing Bobby Bare was influenced by the Seekers version of "500 Miles".
I seriously doubt there is a singer or group capable of topping the Seekers' version of this.
glnelson1956 2 years ago 3
it was likely the other way around. Bobby Bare released his version in 63, the Seekers, my favorite mixed group of all time came out with this version of 500 miles in 64. Bobby is credited with rewriting the words of a very old mountain song......900 miles......others say it was Hedy West.....
And Peter Paul and Mary likely had the biggest hit..... The seekers really likeed PP&M so maybe.......
LittleJimmySouthern 2 years ago
@LittleJimmySouthern Jimmy's right. The whole point about folk songs is they weren't sung by horses, and the lyrics continue to change. Bobby Bare's version is so different, but just as good.
g1h2nedlaw 2 years ago 2
Great point about "Folk Music" - Music of the "Folk" as apposed to music of Jack or Jill. Folk music has the connotation of belonging to the people because it is from the people. There was a special time when the generation of that time embraced the values of folk music as apposed to commercial music. It is sad to me that such values were shouted out in short order. Shouted out, but never lost.
AllenChanThree 1 year ago 4
@LittleJimmySouthern
Yes, and Woody Guthrie did another version and his was called 100 miles in quick time.
g1h2nedlaw 1 year ago
@RainbowSix1984 each is excellent in its own right, i like Bobby's background music better
gooffbball 1 year ago
Incredible, Hauntingly beautiful.
lrhurs 2 years ago 10
lol i bought this album for like 25 p
TESJerkkid 2 years ago 4
Gold Bless Judith Durham!
neotronic 2 years ago 33
Awesome, a muscial masterpiece!!!
RainbowSix1984 2 years ago 3