Kudos for the balls to do this! Where did you get a 4 rotor eccentric shaft? You better get at least a 3inch engine back exhaust, hook up your radiator to your engine(fill it with rad fluid too), put on an intake system (plumbing, Air filter/intake), dual oil coolers, stand alone engine management. If you don't do these things it will never be drivable. Keep up the project and get some professional (RX7 tuner shop) help!
@speedjunkie13 it has an ending one to make the burn more efficiant therefore making for power, smoother and no petrol goes to waste, it all gets burnt (well most of it)
To the fuel consumption comments, from what I understand the 787B 4-rotor (26B) had an extra set of spark plugs that helped burn more fuel mixture and somehow made it more fuel efficient. Don't ask me how, it's just what I read haha.
Rotary engines has only one drawback, fuel consumption, but the world havent really seen what theyre good for yet - on hydrogen, they will outperform any other IC engine....except maybe a turbine - and hydrogen being easy to make for free, the consumption doesnt matter anymore. also in an airplane f.ex. the lower weight evens out the consumption,, and you get the same range as a heavier, less thirsty motor. Its only buisness why they are not everywhere in cars yet...
we need only 2-ROTOR 13B with PP then can beat the racing V6..then if we put 4-ROTOR R26B PP on then can beat the racing V12....THE FACT IS BECAUSE 1-ROTOR GOT A TRIPLE POWER PER CYCLE..we must know that...LOL
that looks like a slug of a homejob tbh. why did you go to so much work to build this and then let the whole job down with shit messy engine bay and poor design. that exhaust manifold looked like something ford would have made in the 30's
@Tj1056 Because if you knew what you were talking about you would know that its inexpensive to build a proper manifold and buy some zip ties to tidy up wiring and just use attention to detail when laying out the engine bay. it doesn't cost much extra at all to do a job that looks like care and attention when't into it. my hat goes off to him for pulling off such a job but going the extra distance helps.
@deztructo123 and look at that exhaust manifold... would you want something of that quality on your intake or have something that you know will work perfectly fine?
@Tj1056 fuck me dead, don' t answer a question with a question and get your terminology right. i'm a mechanic by trade and conversions and general car modifications are a hobby of mine. I have had basic experience with rotories, enough to know that making a 4 rotor is not an easy task its not like its a mass produced motor. so again, what experience do you actually have? are you even a mechanic?
@deztructo123 sure you are a "mechanic by trade"... when building one of these is the same proccess and building a 2 and 3 rotor you are just adding more housing rotors and plates... i don't know how hard it is to understand... it is nothing like building a piston engine...
@Tj1056 sigh, ok boss, what does one have to do build a 4 rotor, if its as simple as putting extra housings, plates and rotors in?? oh and you do realise i have been talking about the exhaust manifold the entire time? the intake would be fine as the stock manifolds had an okay CFM altho the series 5 flowed the best but consume more space.
@deztructo123 you first buy the kit with the plates, e shaft, and bolts... then you buy 2 13b engines and use the housing and rotors and end plates... there is the engine... the rest is simple... this engine here is built by taking 2 13b engines and welding them together... it takes 1 day to tear down and rebuild a rotary engine when you have everything you need... with a real 4 rotor you do ITB with a nice good plenum...
@Tj1056 how did you know he welded the engines together? and those kits have only been on the market for a short time, this vid is years old and he had been making it over 5yrs before that. also because 4 rotor blocks are in their infancy the conversions are very expensive and most places only offer custom racing blocks. i'm sure there is companies out there now offering cheaper conversions but its all still custom built low production run parts.
@deztructo123 because a normal 4 rotor does not have that much space between the intakes... you can see the middle intermediate plate that he used to connect the 2 and he sealed the oil pour spout so unless he machined a larger perfect e-shaft its 2 welded together... learn to count btw, this was posted damn near 2009... its only been near 3 years since this video... a real 4 rotor will have smaller intermediate plate between 3 and 4 rotor, thus smaller e shaft
@Tj1056 yes its 3 yrs since the vid sorry i didnt count it out for you but the project was started 5yrs before the vid date. looks like that was the only affordable way to make a 4 rotor back then, i found a site a while ago when looking for FC v8 conversion kits and he had a go at doing a 4 rotor in the mid 90s but youtube is being a mole and wont let me link it
why not have just took the 2 engines apart and made 1 block? would have saved you a lot of parts and could have sold them for money to buy a legit 1 peice intake manifold...
@stuntrider15 take your certifications and burn them b/c you clearly don't know what you are talking about. That car clearly has efi not carburators. As a matter of fact the manifolds are from 3rd gen Rx-7s(93-95 Usdm)
Sticking two 13b's together is not a four rotor engine, its two 13b's. These are basically what mad mike does and hence going through so many. Not a 26b. Im not a hater, just giving the facts. :)
@bigbigtitties1 you're wrong actually - Mad mikes engine is a P/P 26b engine, custom eccentric shaft, modified centre plates with bearings to carry the quad rotor shaft which has also the correct firing order, one whole engine block. "Just giving the facts" you cannot just stick two 13b's together lol - Mad mikes engine would have cost in the region of £30,000gbp - Just the kit (ie the eccentric shaft and modified housings from KIWI RE is ~£5000 - get YOUR facts right.
@benash04a do you know if there is a factory r26b that can be purchased or are they all custom mad including the the r26b in the 91' 787b lemans car . . could you get back to me thanks heaps
if you were to convert those intake manifolds into a one piece manifold, along with only 1 throttle body for the entire engine, im sure it would run a lot smoother.
@stuntrider15 um negative ... tell me, show me the fuel feed line to the fuel bowls. Oh wait a minute, there it is, to the fuel rail, which the fuel injectors are connected to. Where are the idle mixture bleed screws, what about the peculator hole, dont see venturies. Seems awful strange that a Carb system would be missing all those vital parts and still run.
Ive been working on cars for longer than you kid, 15 yrs with 5 ASE certs (one of them including Engine Performace) .. its FI
@stuntrider15 ASEs don't mean crap. Seen plenty of "Master Certified" and "World Class" technicians in my time, and most of them couldn't fix a sandwich.
@stuntrider15 Wow, you are officially the dumbestfuck of all the dumbfucks, your parents must be retarded Polish siblings. You said the stupidest thing ever said, and got called out on it and mindraped, but yet you keep coming back for more. Just kill yourself already, but first get the book titled "suicide for dumbfucks" you're 15 and the only certs you have are in your piss-stained sweatpants pocket.
Plus there are real life examples of the rotary engine being used in applications that require reliability. The US Marines uses them for the predator drones because they are quite and use little fuel. On top of that they can operate even if the engine is in a bad way, They are light as well. Whether you like it or not bud, these engines are plenty good enough to compare to a piston engine.
@steveoin724 So if rotary engines are so great, reliable, and use little fuel explain why the piston engine domintates the internal combustion engine market in over 99% of all vehicles in the world..Also explain if they are so fuel efficient they get the same fuel economy as a Corvette with over 4L of additional displacement yet for the same fuel usage only produce about half the horsepower??????
Get lost moron. You think you know a lot but you don't know real world.
@Rotaryisgarbage Piston engines are ahead FOR NOW because they are 100+ years older and therefore more developed that the relatively new rotary, which first ran in the mid 1950's. The only problem with rotaries is their poor thermal efficiency. This is due to the fact that rotor housings are raw metal surfaces that absorb and dissipate heat rapidly, more so than a cylinder barrel and head would in a piston engine. If we can develop a coating to contain heat in rotor housings, we're golden.
@Rotaryisgarbage Your an absolute moron. Let me educate you.. like previously stated, piston engines have been used and worked on by over two dozen car companies with unlimited funding, for over 100 years. Rotary's have been worked on by 1 car company for 50 years with very limited funding. The fact they have come this far with such a disadvantage is amazing.
Both engines have there pros and cons. Give the rotary the same time and research funding as pistons and it would be light years ahead.
@crazyjek762 do u know who designed the rotary engine you see in cars to date? seriously? 50 years with one company??? i suppose you think mazda invented it eh? i wait for ur answer before i say who actually designed it. aparently 16 other people dont know either
@Klipnotica I like your play on words. But i cannot discredit you because i myself made a mistake by referencing "rotaries" in general when in fact i meant Wankel rotaries. Felix Wankel (a German) patented the design in the late 20's i believe and developed it with NSU in the late 50's. Yes several companies jumped on and licensed it... but only one company stayed strong and did 90% of its development. This would be Mazda. The rest deemed it as an inefficient engine in terms of cost.
@Klipnotica Other companies have recently jumped into some development in turning it into a hybrid system... as in using a wankel to essentially "recharge" a battery... kind of like a range extender. Some other companies are still tinkering with development... but not like Mazda. If Mazda had the funds of lets say, Toyota (who was one of the licensed wankel users), as well as several other companies all competing... im sure you would see much more development.
@crazyjek762 Those facts are not true. Let me educate you. (unintentional rhyme). The Wankel Rotary engine was also tested used in Rolls Royce as a diesel engine. It was also tested and used in prototype Mercedes cars in the 60's and 70's. Mazda is merely the company who took it and ran with it because they liked it. They're the company that made it famous and "perfected" it.
@crazyjek762 You think so? .... there are serious flaws with this engine design that make it impractical for widespread use. The two biggest are fuel consumption and emissions...the 2 biggest factors cars need to improve on due to tighter standards for both as the years progress. Just like the 2 stroke engine.
Don't be mad just because somebody figured out how to build an engine that gets 6 combustion cycles per TDC instead of only four. Besides, the Wankel is soon to be outdated by the radmax rotary engine. It achieves 24 combustion cycles per TDC. They have a diesel prototype that is 6 inches in diameter and 6 inches in length that makes 42 HP. The engine weighs under 50 pounds. There is not a piston engine in existence with that type of power to weight ratio. New Boss 429 makes 315HP and is 680LB
@steveoin724 First off, a model plane piston engine as a great h.p. for its tiny displacement but you can't power an automobile with one. Second the rad max will have to prove itself and it hasn't. 3rd it is not a Wankel design and when we talk rotary we talk Wankel. Stay on page if you can and come back out of dreamland.
Rotary e-shafts revolve faster than the rotors themselves. It turns 1080 degrees to complete one TDC (thermodynamic cycle). That allows two combustion cycles per revolution like the piston driven engine but the rotary still has 1 combustion cycle left before it completes it's TDC. Really it's apples and oranges. The federal government rates two rotors at 1.3L so four would be 2.6L. If you figure displacement compared to 720 degrees of crank rotation then they would be 2.6L and 5.2L.
I am really disapointed. Theres a guy, he creates a Account called "Rotaryisgarbage" and searches for Youtube Videos where you can see sum rotarys and spends time to write stupid comments.
ok 2 all u fukin retards/haters out there i would love 2 c u guys try 2 do wat he how the hell r u going to call him an idiot wen i bet u guys are all hating on him just because u guys either cant grasp the concept of how he did it or u do and just are hating because u feel that it was a waste of time which its no ....
@TeginProgress Stock Integra? I doubt it. Your stock integra wouldn't beat a 2 rotor RX net alone a 4 rotor. You do know this car is making probably close to 400 HP. You're integra, even if it's a type-R, is only making about 200HP and about 130lb/ft of torque. Simple physics dictates that you would lose. Hondas suck anyway. LOL.
Did you not notice i was joking?? I hope you did because you would be mentally challenged if you didnt. Think a little bit before you reply to people... you just ruined the joke thanks...
@Rotaryisgarbage This guy obviously knows nothing about engines or cars. This is potentially a 1000HP engine with a turbo and the right tune and this guy calls it junk. Just cause it's not a 350c.i. big block or whatever doesn't make it junk. Don't be scared of what you don't understand. This is a 2.6 engine making just as much horsepower as a 6.0 V8. I'm not saying one is better than the other. Just show some respect to a guy whom most likely is one of the only people in America to 1 of these.
@steveoin724 You don't know anything about engines because if you did you would be able to compare equivalent displacement to equivalent displacement. Get some education and come back. I understand these engines blow all the time and even have problems bone stock. Check out my favorites.
I have no fear from and engine that does not run because it blew up.
@Rotaryisgarbage I'm not sure what you are even trying to say. Equivalent displacement to equivalent displacement. There are four rotors each displacing .65 liters per rotor face with three faces. Being that the rotary engine achieves more combustion cycles per revolution(two) than a comparable four cylinder engine. The piston driven engine's crank must rotate 720 degrees to complete one thermodynamic cycle. That is to say for all four cylinders to fire one time the crank around twice.
@steveoin724 You obviously know anything as if you did you would know that the rotary can't handle even its stock h.p. and have decent longevity. 13B turbo had many failures. The renensis was better but still a poor performer when it came to reliability with plenty of youtube vids alone as proof. As soon as you turbocharge all bets are off as that 350 piston engine is capable of far more than 1000 h.p. with forced induction. Again I will encourage you to get real
@Rotaryisgarbage I agree that a 350 turbo would make much more power. However, it is doing it with much more displacement. You know the four rotor is equal to the displacement of a V6 not a V8. So what now, you gonna mentions how you know they are junk. You can say it all day, but that don't make it true. I have owned them, torn them down and rebuilt them. I personally know someone whom builds performance rotary engines for a living and know several folks whom own one. They last just fine.
@Rotaryisgarbage Get real? You're the one trying to compare two engines that neither have the same displacement or even the same thermodynamic cycles. You might not get engineering and thermodynamics, but I, however, do. Like I said you are tasting an apple and then an orange and saying the orange tastes bad because it doesn't taste like an apple. If you like apples then fine. Eat apples. But, don't try to convince me that oranges are good because they're not apples. That's why I like them.
@Rotaryisgarbage what i cant figure out is if you dont like rotarys so much why the fuck do i keep seeing your comments on them? Stop using the search term "rotary" and you wont have to see them and better yet we wont have to see you.. ya fuckin dumbass.
do you still have this motor and if so how is it running, would you be able give me the specs i wanted to try this , what about the crank shaft how did you piece that together, drop me a line at kerwin1968@hotmail.com
how can you say that is garbage. Just to get that working is an amazing effort. Took the guy 5 years. What have you done in the last 5 years ? ........................... Nothing ............ cause your a looser !
if your going to trash talk, at least spell your words right. sorry dude but your wrong, if you dont have anything nice to say then dont say anything at all.
Hey don't worry about it. If you don't like my comments don't read them or reply to them. Simple enough a stupid rotard like yourself can even understand.
@Rotaryisgarbage Like I said before: I'd rather be a "rotard" than some moron who spends all day in his mother's basement trolling YouTube rotary videos all day. There are plenty of rotary-hating forums on the internet. If you don't like rotary engines, take your hate out them there. Google is a useful tool, in case you haven't noticed.
@AzNtacoSAUCE What you have said before is nothing as you can't prove shit. Maybe you are the one in your mother's basement because I assure you that I am not. Here is another example of you trying to lie in the face of facts, just like you do with the junk rotary engine. If you don't like my posts on here don't read or respond to them. Another simple fact that eludes your very simple mind. I can post whatever I want to on here.
@Bamchucknorris nah u got it all wrong there buddy did u finish school i said its garbage hahaha i hate rotary unless its 3 rotor i have a 20b to put in my starlet but this one doesnt look right at all
@big203jay I understand, I was countering your negative comment by using reverse psychology to confuse you into thinking that your original statement implied that piston power actually sucks, whereas I had really deciphered that the statement in fact denounced the rotary engine.
@Beldar4214 True, but rotaries are much simpler and more modern versions are reliable enough for continuous aircraft duty, but rotaries are still 50 years behind pistons; the first wankel ran in 1957...
@Bamchucknorris Cool. Yea like I said, they all have their advantages lol. If I were to own anything with a rotary, I would want a rotary swapped Beetle. MPG would probably be about the same there, but better reliability and much more power. lol
i dunno if im the only one thats stated the obvious but @0:54 those pipes are freakn ridiculous!? u NEED some fresh free flowing pipes man.. that'd be causing mammoth problems!! ur intake looks spot on but what about the constipated wastepipes man :/ ! seriously sort that shit out dude!!
@jasonwrightbrown Exactly, if he could weld decent enough to put that shit together then he can by all means weld up a proper turbo header, I'd probably do two small twin turbos and a custom 4" dual exhaust for each turbo side. Other then that he did far better then what I could do I'm still sorting out some major fuel issues with my cousins TII.
i bet that rotaryisgarbage guy hates rotary so much because the black guy who is fucking his girl drives an Fd and smacked him in a race with what ever he is driving( if he even owns a car) and after the black guy got done smashing his girl he shoved a piston in his ass
@rotaryisgarbage you're a moron. Piston engines will NEVER replace rotaries in the RX series, seeing as how it stands for rotary experimental. Oh, and FYI, the next gen will be running the newly developed 1.6 replacing the old 1.3's.
@tenchisensoo Pistons DO replace the rotary engine on a daily basis as the owner gets tired of rebuilding the POS engine. Look on here and at my favorites. The future of the rotary is grim as it gets very poor fuel economy and has terrible emissions due to its odd shaped combustion chamber. Wait until Mazda drops the engine, then you idiots will have to come up with other excuses.
@Rotaryisgarbage It's so much fun proving morons wrong. I work for Mazda, the reps have already come to describe the new engine. Using their new Direct Injection technology combined with a redesign of the rotor shape has increased fuel economy and reduced emissions. Not to mention the fact that increases horse power, and greatly increases low end torque. And as far as your engine swap theory goes, does someone putting a car body on a truck mean thats going to be the future design for trucks?
@Rotaryisgarbage Oh and on a side note, I'm not sure if you're familiar with the 24 hour lemans, but the Rotary engine rocked that race so hard they outlawed rotaries from the series completely.
@Rotaryisgarbage You're pretty damn sad Rotaryisgarbage/aji8. Three years and counting you have proved to us that you have no life, no LSRX7 you SAY you have, and most of all: Real life facts. Watching the 50K+ videos on youtube with rx7 or your personal favorite 'blown rotary engine', but when it comes down to asking you something, you just say your usual 'moron' or 'rotard' (Only you would say such a made up word)
@Rotaryisgarbage You really dont know what you are talking about do you? why is it that someone post a video of what they have made, and low lifes like you that have nothing nice to show for yourself have to put what they have down.. GET A LIFE!
@Rotaryisgarbage My friend may i make a suggestion? Find a nice hot shrink and unload brother. You are getting all worked up over something so stupid. Yes the rotary engine has its ups and downs but so does a piston engine. Where one lacks the other picks up in. The rotary engine is a really cool idea and yeah they dont have great low end torqe and they seem to take a while to start but so what that idea is really sweet so from what post iv seen of yours really chill out kid
@NStalk3 You are not my friend and I am not worked up over rotary engines. I find the vids funny because they sound like my weedwhacker but don't last as long....lol
@Rotaryisgarbage haha you think them funny? so what if they sound like a weedwhacker and um whats not lasting long ? your little weedwhacker? I think i know what happened to you, you were beat by a rotary engine and now you hate them is that it? well im sorry to hear that
Great Job and dedication to your work... Don't let the bad/stupid comments of others influence you into defending what you have accomplished. You did great!
btw nipponbaka even someone with your vaunted expertise is going to have a hard time writing a book about the pistons and conrods available for a rotary engine...see what i mean by talking out of your ass?
warblade is right just a little complicated to understand thats all. it does take some thinking to understand why you have to double a rotary's engine to get a normal piston engine. rotary 1 rev = 1 power pulse (power stroke) piston 2 rev's = 1 power stroke.
Kudos for the balls to do this! Where did you get a 4 rotor eccentric shaft? You better get at least a 3inch engine back exhaust, hook up your radiator to your engine(fill it with rad fluid too), put on an intake system (plumbing, Air filter/intake), dual oil coolers, stand alone engine management. If you don't do these things it will never be drivable. Keep up the project and get some professional (RX7 tuner shop) help!
DearAlbert1 1 day ago
thats amazing work, where can i find more info on it?
miamipacheco 3 days ago
@speedjunkie13 it has an ending one to make the burn more efficiant therefore making for power, smoother and no petrol goes to waste, it all gets burnt (well most of it)
kman79wagon 3 days ago
fuck exhuast just run a straight pipe hahah.
stirunner95 4 days ago
would you not need a exhaust at least twice the size of stock?
rx7vtec 1 week ago
To the fuel consumption comments, from what I understand the 787B 4-rotor (26B) had an extra set of spark plugs that helped burn more fuel mixture and somehow made it more fuel efficient. Don't ask me how, it's just what I read haha.
speedjunkie13 1 week ago
what a smooth revving engine :)
batchnerd 3 weeks ago
Rotary engines has only one drawback, fuel consumption, but the world havent really seen what theyre good for yet - on hydrogen, they will outperform any other IC engine....except maybe a turbine - and hydrogen being easy to make for free, the consumption doesnt matter anymore. also in an airplane f.ex. the lower weight evens out the consumption,, and you get the same range as a heavier, less thirsty motor. Its only buisness why they are not everywhere in cars yet...
happyfox711 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we need only 2-ROTOR 13B with PP then can beat the racing V6..then if we put 4-ROTOR R26B PP on then can beat the racing V12....THE FACT IS BECAUSE 1-ROTOR GOT A TRIPLE POWER PER CYCLE..we must know that...LOL
soraaoixxthebluesky 1 month ago
Comment removed
soraaoixxthebluesky 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how much horsepower does this engine produce?
RX7GANGSTERS 1 month ago
Comment removed
RX7GANGSTERS 1 month ago
Im an american car kinda guy but rotary engines are kinda cool.
MrTrip3ace 1 month ago 4
Comment removed
dyno1316 1 month ago
Yikes... that's got to be at least 700lbs-800lbs of motor.
originaldriver 1 month ago
How you gone have a name like rotaryisgarbage? You obviously got yo ass beat by many rotas to seek such revenge ROFL...simply a hater
55bobito 2 months ago
Drunk cameraman.
DobermansRock 2 months ago
that looks like a slug of a homejob tbh. why did you go to so much work to build this and then let the whole job down with shit messy engine bay and poor design. that exhaust manifold looked like something ford would have made in the 30's
deztructo123 2 months ago
@deztructo123 because some people like to build things on a budget...
Tj1056 2 months ago
@Tj1056 Because if you knew what you were talking about you would know that its inexpensive to build a proper manifold and buy some zip ties to tidy up wiring and just use attention to detail when laying out the engine bay. it doesn't cost much extra at all to do a job that looks like care and attention when't into it. my hat goes off to him for pulling off such a job but going the extra distance helps.
deztructo123 1 month ago
@deztructo123 well if you do not know how to fabricate stuff up yourself then it does become expensive...
Tj1056 1 month ago
@Tj1056 dude... look at the video name "hand built 4-rotor" i think he possesses the skills. plus the manifold on it is obviously home built
deztructo123 1 month ago
@deztructo123 and look at that exhaust manifold... would you want something of that quality on your intake or have something that you know will work perfectly fine?
Tj1056 1 month ago
@Tj1056 ??? that doesnt even make sense? infact i dont think you have ever done an engine conversion project b4
deztructo123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deztructo123 your a fucking moron... thats all I have to say... you obviously do not know shit about cars...
Tj1056 1 month ago
@deztructo123 and back to your "hand built 4-rotor" ... you really think its hard to build any type or rotary engine?
Tj1056 1 month ago
@Tj1056 fuck me dead, don' t answer a question with a question and get your terminology right. i'm a mechanic by trade and conversions and general car modifications are a hobby of mine. I have had basic experience with rotories, enough to know that making a 4 rotor is not an easy task its not like its a mass produced motor. so again, what experience do you actually have? are you even a mechanic?
deztructo123 1 month ago
@deztructo123 sure you are a "mechanic by trade"... when building one of these is the same proccess and building a 2 and 3 rotor you are just adding more housing rotors and plates... i don't know how hard it is to understand... it is nothing like building a piston engine...
Tj1056 1 month ago
Comment removed
deztructo123 1 month ago
@Tj1056 sigh, ok boss, what does one have to do build a 4 rotor, if its as simple as putting extra housings, plates and rotors in?? oh and you do realise i have been talking about the exhaust manifold the entire time? the intake would be fine as the stock manifolds had an okay CFM altho the series 5 flowed the best but consume more space.
deztructo123 1 month ago
@deztructo123 you first buy the kit with the plates, e shaft, and bolts... then you buy 2 13b engines and use the housing and rotors and end plates... there is the engine... the rest is simple... this engine here is built by taking 2 13b engines and welding them together... it takes 1 day to tear down and rebuild a rotary engine when you have everything you need... with a real 4 rotor you do ITB with a nice good plenum...
Tj1056 1 month ago
@Tj1056 how did you know he welded the engines together? and those kits have only been on the market for a short time, this vid is years old and he had been making it over 5yrs before that. also because 4 rotor blocks are in their infancy the conversions are very expensive and most places only offer custom racing blocks. i'm sure there is companies out there now offering cheaper conversions but its all still custom built low production run parts.
deztructo123 1 month ago
@deztructo123 because a normal 4 rotor does not have that much space between the intakes... you can see the middle intermediate plate that he used to connect the 2 and he sealed the oil pour spout so unless he machined a larger perfect e-shaft its 2 welded together... learn to count btw, this was posted damn near 2009... its only been near 3 years since this video... a real 4 rotor will have smaller intermediate plate between 3 and 4 rotor, thus smaller e shaft
Tj1056 1 month ago
@Tj1056 yes its 3 yrs since the vid sorry i didnt count it out for you but the project was started 5yrs before the vid date. looks like that was the only affordable way to make a 4 rotor back then, i found a site a while ago when looking for FC v8 conversion kits and he had a go at doing a 4 rotor in the mid 90s but youtube is being a mole and wont let me link it
deztructo123 1 month ago
why not have just took the 2 engines apart and made 1 block? would have saved you a lot of parts and could have sold them for money to buy a legit 1 peice intake manifold...
Tj1056 2 months ago
the wiring looks like a nightmare.
DarkShadowBassBoosts 2 months ago
Holy Fuck :O
6619125624 2 months ago
That's utterly insane. The world is a better place for having someone so entertainingly bonkers as you in it. I hope you get your idling sorted.
gordonjcp 3 months ago
@stuntrider15 take your certifications and burn them b/c you clearly don't know what you are talking about. That car clearly has efi not carburators. As a matter of fact the manifolds are from 3rd gen Rx-7s(93-95 Usdm)
Velal07 3 months ago
You're a terrible camera man
Pinkishbass91 3 months ago
Sticking two 13b's together is not a four rotor engine, its two 13b's. These are basically what mad mike does and hence going through so many. Not a 26b. Im not a hater, just giving the facts. :)
bigbigtitties1 4 months ago
@bigbigtitties1 you're wrong actually - Mad mikes engine is a P/P 26b engine, custom eccentric shaft, modified centre plates with bearings to carry the quad rotor shaft which has also the correct firing order, one whole engine block. "Just giving the facts" you cannot just stick two 13b's together lol - Mad mikes engine would have cost in the region of £30,000gbp - Just the kit (ie the eccentric shaft and modified housings from KIWI RE is ~£5000 - get YOUR facts right.
benash04a 4 months ago
@benash04a do you know if there is a factory r26b that can be purchased or are they all custom mad including the the r26b in the 91' 787b lemans car . . could you get back to me thanks heaps
Antonio001z 3 months ago
@Antonio001z the only factory r26b are in the le mans cars... you can buy 26b from a website from NZ... they will cost 40k+ tho...
Tj1056 2 months ago
@Tj1056 whats the site?? can you tell me please??
Antonio001z 2 months ago
if you were to convert those intake manifolds into a one piece manifold, along with only 1 throttle body for the entire engine, im sure it would run a lot smoother.
automotiveDIY 5 months ago
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh myyyyyyyyyyy keyboard. Shit asdk;jasd;ja;sdj;asdjasbdasd
Blu813SD 5 months ago
umm ha hows no air filters working for ya? that is hell on the motor.
roamerreed 5 months ago
@roamerreed its carbed, so its been working just fine
stuntrider15 4 months ago
@stuntrider15 ummm .. what carbs where ???? all i see are two Throttle bodies. ~~~~~ I.E. its FI not carbed.
x0druid0x 4 months ago
@x0druid0x those would be carbs you dumbfuck
stuntrider15 4 months ago
@stuntrider15 um negative ... tell me, show me the fuel feed line to the fuel bowls. Oh wait a minute, there it is, to the fuel rail, which the fuel injectors are connected to. Where are the idle mixture bleed screws, what about the peculator hole, dont see venturies. Seems awful strange that a Carb system would be missing all those vital parts and still run.
Ive been working on cars for longer than you kid, 15 yrs with 5 ASE certs (one of them including Engine Performace) .. its FI
x0druid0x 4 months ago
@x0druid0x congrats i have 8 certifications in ASE. ive been around longer then you have buddy
stuntrider15 4 months ago
@stuntrider15 its still Fuel Injection.
x0druid0x 4 months ago
@stuntrider15 ASEs don't mean crap. Seen plenty of "Master Certified" and "World Class" technicians in my time, and most of them couldn't fix a sandwich.
plinkytx 3 months ago
@plinkytx congrats tell that to the other guy
stuntrider15 3 months ago
@stuntrider15 Well, I would say that you're a prime example of my statement because I don't see any carburetors on that engine.
plinkytx 3 months ago
@stuntrider15 Wow, you are officially the dumbestfuck of all the dumbfucks, your parents must be retarded Polish siblings. You said the stupidest thing ever said, and got called out on it and mindraped, but yet you keep coming back for more. Just kill yourself already, but first get the book titled "suicide for dumbfucks" you're 15 and the only certs you have are in your piss-stained sweatpants pocket.
Mcroostr 3 months ago
That thing looks mean
livehumansinside19 5 months ago
Seems like it takes five years of weekends to start, too.
RulerOfEverything 5 months ago
you could probably find an intake mani from overseas?
richc573 5 months ago
Pure nasty!!!!
Dfoy01 6 months ago
i frekkin love wankels, try fitting 2 piston engines under one hood. 1rotor=3 small pistons.
JasonMann8 6 months ago
What a wanker.
sweepstrat 7 months ago 12
@sweepstrat Wankler.
SYSPLUCK 2 months ago in playlist More videos from bosephus79
now twin turbo each engine
Fruna123 8 months ago
@Fruna123 each engine? whaaat? theres only one engine there!
0GTXR 8 months ago
@0GTXR shut up im hung over! lol :p
Fruna123 8 months ago
Need a stronger starter. Great innovation.
Blessedtouch 8 months ago
Plus there are real life examples of the rotary engine being used in applications that require reliability. The US Marines uses them for the predator drones because they are quite and use little fuel. On top of that they can operate even if the engine is in a bad way, They are light as well. Whether you like it or not bud, these engines are plenty good enough to compare to a piston engine.
steveoin724 8 months ago
@steveoin724 So if rotary engines are so great, reliable, and use little fuel explain why the piston engine domintates the internal combustion engine market in over 99% of all vehicles in the world..Also explain if they are so fuel efficient they get the same fuel economy as a Corvette with over 4L of additional displacement yet for the same fuel usage only produce about half the horsepower??????
Get lost moron. You think you know a lot but you don't know real world.
Rotaryisgarbage 7 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Piston engines are ahead FOR NOW because they are 100+ years older and therefore more developed that the relatively new rotary, which first ran in the mid 1950's. The only problem with rotaries is their poor thermal efficiency. This is due to the fact that rotor housings are raw metal surfaces that absorb and dissipate heat rapidly, more so than a cylinder barrel and head would in a piston engine. If we can develop a coating to contain heat in rotor housings, we're golden.
Bamchucknorris 7 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Your an absolute moron. Let me educate you.. like previously stated, piston engines have been used and worked on by over two dozen car companies with unlimited funding, for over 100 years. Rotary's have been worked on by 1 car company for 50 years with very limited funding. The fact they have come this far with such a disadvantage is amazing.
Both engines have there pros and cons. Give the rotary the same time and research funding as pistons and it would be light years ahead.
crazyjek762 6 months ago 42
@crazyjek762 Well said mate
Wiggman2030 6 months ago
@crazyjek762 Two actually. But you're right.
JordanWallac3 3 months ago
@crazyjek762 do u know who designed the rotary engine you see in cars to date? seriously? 50 years with one company??? i suppose you think mazda invented it eh? i wait for ur answer before i say who actually designed it. aparently 16 other people dont know either
Klipnotica 2 months ago
@Klipnotica I like your play on words. But i cannot discredit you because i myself made a mistake by referencing "rotaries" in general when in fact i meant Wankel rotaries. Felix Wankel (a German) patented the design in the late 20's i believe and developed it with NSU in the late 50's. Yes several companies jumped on and licensed it... but only one company stayed strong and did 90% of its development. This would be Mazda. The rest deemed it as an inefficient engine in terms of cost.
crazyjek762 2 months ago
@Klipnotica Other companies have recently jumped into some development in turning it into a hybrid system... as in using a wankel to essentially "recharge" a battery... kind of like a range extender. Some other companies are still tinkering with development... but not like Mazda. If Mazda had the funds of lets say, Toyota (who was one of the licensed wankel users), as well as several other companies all competing... im sure you would see much more development.
crazyjek762 2 months ago
@crazyjek762 yeah ok let me know what so advanced about piston engines that surpass the rotory.
jaylaw6369 2 months ago
@jaylaw6369 longtivity... thats about all I can think...
Tj1056 2 months ago
@crazyjek762 Speak the truth lol...that guy is a very big hater
55bobito 2 months ago
@crazyjek762 Those facts are not true. Let me educate you. (unintentional rhyme). The Wankel Rotary engine was also tested used in Rolls Royce as a diesel engine. It was also tested and used in prototype Mercedes cars in the 60's and 70's. Mazda is merely the company who took it and ran with it because they liked it. They're the company that made it famous and "perfected" it.
Littlemac181 1 month ago
@crazyjek762 You think so? .... there are serious flaws with this engine design that make it impractical for widespread use. The two biggest are fuel consumption and emissions...the 2 biggest factors cars need to improve on due to tighter standards for both as the years progress. Just like the 2 stroke engine.
SaGalv 1 month ago
@crazyjek762 most liked comment ^^^ i think so
Tunerboii2045 2 weeks ago
Don't be mad just because somebody figured out how to build an engine that gets 6 combustion cycles per TDC instead of only four. Besides, the Wankel is soon to be outdated by the radmax rotary engine. It achieves 24 combustion cycles per TDC. They have a diesel prototype that is 6 inches in diameter and 6 inches in length that makes 42 HP. The engine weighs under 50 pounds. There is not a piston engine in existence with that type of power to weight ratio. New Boss 429 makes 315HP and is 680LB
steveoin724 8 months ago
@steveoin724 First off, a model plane piston engine as a great h.p. for its tiny displacement but you can't power an automobile with one. Second the rad max will have to prove itself and it hasn't. 3rd it is not a Wankel design and when we talk rotary we talk Wankel. Stay on page if you can and come back out of dreamland.
Rotaryisgarbage 7 months ago
Rotary e-shafts revolve faster than the rotors themselves. It turns 1080 degrees to complete one TDC (thermodynamic cycle). That allows two combustion cycles per revolution like the piston driven engine but the rotary still has 1 combustion cycle left before it completes it's TDC. Really it's apples and oranges. The federal government rates two rotors at 1.3L so four would be 2.6L. If you figure displacement compared to 720 degrees of crank rotation then they would be 2.6L and 5.2L.
steveoin724 8 months ago
well done mate, great to see people sticking with their goals and taking the time to create something amazing.
Benji19922 8 months ago
What did you use as a coupler between eshaft 1 and eshaft 2? Or did you buy the kit with the full length eshaft already? just wondering!
And great build, sounds like a beast and can't wait for more updates :)
lilsht92 8 months ago
poor starter
94DSMKING 8 months ago
Where are the air filters? Seems like with as much work went into that engine, you dont want anything else going in it...
choprpilot1 8 months ago
I am really disapointed. Theres a guy, he creates a Account called "Rotaryisgarbage" and searches for Youtube Videos where you can see sum rotarys and spends time to write stupid comments.
Dude...Get a Life. Please.
AtzengamerMemphis 8 months ago
That's the quietest 4 rotor I've ever heard.
shadowscreed276 8 months ago
ok 2 all u fukin retards/haters out there i would love 2 c u guys try 2 do wat he how the hell r u going to call him an idiot wen i bet u guys are all hating on him just because u guys either cant grasp the concept of how he did it or u do and just are hating because u feel that it was a waste of time which its no ....
livindaunderground 9 months ago
Awesome you are the man. good work
FJAY1ER 9 months ago
lolapexseals
ButtaYoBread510 9 months ago
This is awesome :)
theunknown2142 9 months ago
Dont flatter yourself... I have a bone stock fwd integra that would eat that thing for breakfast.
TeginProgress 9 months ago
@TeginProgress Hahahahahahahahaha
MrFredHoogendoorn 9 months ago
@TeginProgress You are an idiot, do you have any idea how hard a Quad rotor is to build?
FJAY1ER 9 months ago
@TeginProgress Idiot
FJAY1ER 9 months ago
Idiot
FJAY1ER 9 months ago
@TeginProgress Stock Integra? I doubt it. Your stock integra wouldn't beat a 2 rotor RX net alone a 4 rotor. You do know this car is making probably close to 400 HP. You're integra, even if it's a type-R, is only making about 200HP and about 130lb/ft of torque. Simple physics dictates that you would lose. Hondas suck anyway. LOL.
steveoin724 8 months ago
@steveoin724
Did you not notice i was joking?? I hope you did because you would be mentally challenged if you didnt. Think a little bit before you reply to people... you just ruined the joke thanks...
TeginProgress 8 months ago
Junk engine, good luck with 4 rotors of failure!
Rotaryisgarbage 9 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage your a fagot for sure!
FJAY1ER 9 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage This guy obviously knows nothing about engines or cars. This is potentially a 1000HP engine with a turbo and the right tune and this guy calls it junk. Just cause it's not a 350c.i. big block or whatever doesn't make it junk. Don't be scared of what you don't understand. This is a 2.6 engine making just as much horsepower as a 6.0 V8. I'm not saying one is better than the other. Just show some respect to a guy whom most likely is one of the only people in America to 1 of these.
steveoin724 8 months ago
@steveoin724 You don't know anything about engines because if you did you would be able to compare equivalent displacement to equivalent displacement. Get some education and come back. I understand these engines blow all the time and even have problems bone stock. Check out my favorites.
I have no fear from and engine that does not run because it blew up.
Rotaryisgarbage 8 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Cool story, bro.
AzNtacoSAUCE 8 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage I'm not sure what you are even trying to say. Equivalent displacement to equivalent displacement. There are four rotors each displacing .65 liters per rotor face with three faces. Being that the rotary engine achieves more combustion cycles per revolution(two) than a comparable four cylinder engine. The piston driven engine's crank must rotate 720 degrees to complete one thermodynamic cycle. That is to say for all four cylinders to fire one time the crank around twice.
steveoin724 8 months ago
@steveoin724 You obviously know anything as if you did you would know that the rotary can't handle even its stock h.p. and have decent longevity. 13B turbo had many failures. The renensis was better but still a poor performer when it came to reliability with plenty of youtube vids alone as proof. As soon as you turbocharge all bets are off as that 350 piston engine is capable of far more than 1000 h.p. with forced induction. Again I will encourage you to get real
Rotaryisgarbage 7 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage I agree that a 350 turbo would make much more power. However, it is doing it with much more displacement. You know the four rotor is equal to the displacement of a V6 not a V8. So what now, you gonna mentions how you know they are junk. You can say it all day, but that don't make it true. I have owned them, torn them down and rebuilt them. I personally know someone whom builds performance rotary engines for a living and know several folks whom own one. They last just fine.
steveoin724 7 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Get real? You're the one trying to compare two engines that neither have the same displacement or even the same thermodynamic cycles. You might not get engineering and thermodynamics, but I, however, do. Like I said you are tasting an apple and then an orange and saying the orange tastes bad because it doesn't taste like an apple. If you like apples then fine. Eat apples. But, don't try to convince me that oranges are good because they're not apples. That's why I like them.
steveoin724 7 months ago 2
@Rotaryisgarbage Cool story, bro.
AzNtacoSAUCE 6 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage what i cant figure out is if you dont like rotarys so much why the fuck do i keep seeing your comments on them? Stop using the search term "rotary" and you wont have to see them and better yet we wont have to see you.. ya fuckin dumbass.
spyderhex 5 months ago
R.E.S.P.E.C.T......hope 2 see sum videos of d build soon.
ROTORHEADPR 9 months ago
how teach me someone!!!!! we need more videos!
rotarycorvette1 9 months ago
how teach me someone!!!!!
rotarycorvette1 9 months ago
holy shit son plz tell me ur keeping it N/A
tauumie 9 months ago
Sounds good!
vfIskullangel 9 months ago
Dude your my hero :) :) :)
RotaryGTUs 9 months ago
Great gob guys
LuisNunez210 10 months ago
I am amazed at the ingenuity it takes to build such a machine!
james6speed 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
do you still have this motor and if so how is it running, would you be able give me the specs i wanted to try this , what about the crank shaft how did you piece that together, drop me a line at kerwin1968@hotmail.com
triniman3001 10 months ago
how can you say that is garbage. Just to get that working is an amazing effort. Took the guy 5 years. What have you done in the last 5 years ? ........................... Nothing ............ cause your a looser !
nick081980 10 months ago
@nick081980 Like you can do better. all you doing is making yourself look like a fool by pointing out something you cant do! :P
LuisNunez210 10 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage
if your going to trash talk, at least spell your words right. sorry dude but your wrong, if you dont have anything nice to say then dont say anything at all.
wannadriftful 10 months ago
This engine won't last. They are bad enough when a car company with millions of dollars builds them.
Rotaryisgarbage 11 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage wow you're STILL trolling rotary videos? just start a thread on 4chan or something, you newfag. problem?
AzNtacoSAUCE 10 months ago
@AzNtacoSAUCE
Hey don't worry about it. If you don't like my comments don't read them or reply to them. Simple enough a stupid rotard like yourself can even understand.
Rotaryisgarbage 10 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Like I said before: I'd rather be a "rotard" than some moron who spends all day in his mother's basement trolling YouTube rotary videos all day. There are plenty of rotary-hating forums on the internet. If you don't like rotary engines, take your hate out them there. Google is a useful tool, in case you haven't noticed.
AzNtacoSAUCE 9 months ago
@AzNtacoSAUCE What you have said before is nothing as you can't prove shit. Maybe you are the one in your mother's basement because I assure you that I am not. Here is another example of you trying to lie in the face of facts, just like you do with the junk rotary engine. If you don't like my posts on here don't read or respond to them. Another simple fact that eludes your very simple mind. I can post whatever I want to on here.
Rotaryisgarbage 8 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage u mad, bro?
AzNtacoSAUCE 8 months ago
Does the car move? :D
pherroz 11 months ago
garbage PISTON POWER baby!!!!
big203jay 11 months ago
@big203jay youre right... piston power is garbage
Bamchucknorris 11 months ago
@Bamchucknorris nah u got it all wrong there buddy did u finish school i said its garbage hahaha i hate rotary unless its 3 rotor i have a 20b to put in my starlet but this one doesnt look right at all
big203jay 11 months ago
@big203jay I understand, I was countering your negative comment by using reverse psychology to confuse you into thinking that your original statement implied that piston power actually sucks, whereas I had really deciphered that the statement in fact denounced the rotary engine.
Bamchucknorris 11 months ago
@big203jay yea i figured that hahaha well done!!
big203jay 10 months ago
@Bamchucknorris Just as much as rotary low end torque is garbage. Go figure. Both have their advantages....
Beldar4214 9 months ago
@Beldar4214 True, but rotaries are much simpler and more modern versions are reliable enough for continuous aircraft duty, but rotaries are still 50 years behind pistons; the first wankel ran in 1957...
Bamchucknorris 9 months ago
@Bamchucknorris Indeed. 50 years behind aside, an engine that can fire 3 times in one RPM... Genius idea.
Beldar4214 9 months ago
@Beldar4214 Don;t get me wrong, I love rotaries. I've rebuilt an os wankel and a sachs km914b. They just suck up fuel like a vaccume
Bamchucknorris 9 months ago
@Bamchucknorris Cool. Yea like I said, they all have their advantages lol. If I were to own anything with a rotary, I would want a rotary swapped Beetle. MPG would probably be about the same there, but better reliability and much more power. lol
Beldar4214 9 months ago
great work! i luv the project!
badassalf 11 months ago
OMG O.O
GrandMoffSilvey 11 months ago
Nothing new .... Now if that little rx-7 had two joined big blocks now your talkin...
MegaJustin1988 11 months ago
Wow @Rotaryisgarbage. Fuck You!
endurance1337 11 months ago
i dunno if im the only one thats stated the obvious but @0:54 those pipes are freakn ridiculous!? u NEED some fresh free flowing pipes man.. that'd be causing mammoth problems!! ur intake looks spot on but what about the constipated wastepipes man :/ ! seriously sort that shit out dude!!
jasonwrightbrown 11 months ago 18
@jasonwrightbrown maybe thats just the 1st step to see if he did a great job 1st start up sort of stuff you know...
Babyhulk24 8 months ago
@jasonwrightbrown Exactly, if he could weld decent enough to put that shit together then he can by all means weld up a proper turbo header, I'd probably do two small twin turbos and a custom 4" dual exhaust for each turbo side. Other then that he did far better then what I could do I'm still sorting out some major fuel issues with my cousins TII.
Blackinterceptor999 5 months ago
@jasonwrightbrown you should race him
SaintStyn 5 months ago
@jasonwrightbrown That's probably not a wastegate. This car is N/A.
JordanWallac3 3 months ago
@wildbloodydragon Ill let you double my Wankel.
xxbatman94xx 11 months ago 28
@xxbatman94xx
Lol!
saradawn6 11 months ago
very nicely done! pics of the build?
mrdiesel96 11 months ago
i bet that rotaryisgarbage guy hates rotary so much because the black guy who is fucking his girl drives an Fd and smacked him in a race with what ever he is driving( if he even owns a car) and after the black guy got done smashing his girl he shoved a piston in his ass
birdseatdogs 11 months ago
You just need to bi-turbo that lot and you got yourself some kind of engine porn.
TheIronz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
where can i purchase a 4 rotor engine mail me at swainsimon@hotmail.com
ilie1100 1 year ago
@rotaryisgarbage you're a moron. Piston engines will NEVER replace rotaries in the RX series, seeing as how it stands for rotary experimental. Oh, and FYI, the next gen will be running the newly developed 1.6 replacing the old 1.3's.
tenchisensoo 1 year ago
@tenchisensoo Pistons DO replace the rotary engine on a daily basis as the owner gets tired of rebuilding the POS engine. Look on here and at my favorites. The future of the rotary is grim as it gets very poor fuel economy and has terrible emissions due to its odd shaped combustion chamber. Wait until Mazda drops the engine, then you idiots will have to come up with other excuses.
Rotaryisgarbage 1 year ago
@Rotaryisgarbage It's so much fun proving morons wrong. I work for Mazda, the reps have already come to describe the new engine. Using their new Direct Injection technology combined with a redesign of the rotor shape has increased fuel economy and reduced emissions. Not to mention the fact that increases horse power, and greatly increases low end torque. And as far as your engine swap theory goes, does someone putting a car body on a truck mean thats going to be the future design for trucks?
tenchisensoo 1 year ago
@Rotaryisgarbage Oh and on a side note, I'm not sure if you're familiar with the 24 hour lemans, but the Rotary engine rocked that race so hard they outlawed rotaries from the series completely.
tenchisensoo 1 year ago
@Rotaryisgarbage why dont u crawl in a fukin dark hole u arragant CUNT
budzag 1 year ago
@Rotaryisgarbage You're pretty damn sad Rotaryisgarbage/aji8. Three years and counting you have proved to us that you have no life, no LSRX7 you SAY you have, and most of all: Real life facts. Watching the 50K+ videos on youtube with rx7 or your personal favorite 'blown rotary engine', but when it comes down to asking you something, you just say your usual 'moron' or 'rotard' (Only you would say such a made up word)
Do us all a favor and get a life, PLEASE......
Wait, who am I kidding....
Boyneedsgames 1 year ago
@Boyneedsgames he wont listen his arrogance is so great lol
Tj1056 11 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage You really dont know what you are talking about do you? why is it that someone post a video of what they have made, and low lifes like you that have nothing nice to show for yourself have to put what they have down.. GET A LIFE!
mrdiesel96 11 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage My friend may i make a suggestion? Find a nice hot shrink and unload brother. You are getting all worked up over something so stupid. Yes the rotary engine has its ups and downs but so does a piston engine. Where one lacks the other picks up in. The rotary engine is a really cool idea and yeah they dont have great low end torqe and they seem to take a while to start but so what that idea is really sweet so from what post iv seen of yours really chill out kid
NStalk3 11 months ago
@NStalk3 You are not my friend and I am not worked up over rotary engines. I find the vids funny because they sound like my weedwhacker but don't last as long....lol
Rotaryisgarbage 11 months ago
@Rotaryisgarbage haha you think them funny? so what if they sound like a weedwhacker and um whats not lasting long ? your little weedwhacker? I think i know what happened to you, you were beat by a rotary engine and now you hate them is that it? well im sorry to hear that
NStalk3 11 months ago
one wasnt enough two is
JuanPapaNicolao 1 year ago
Why not twin turbo for both of those s6-8 blocks?
backyardrotaz 1 year ago
to much work prety cool!!!
show us some hight revs sounds terrific
driftking9293 1 year ago
Great Job and dedication to your work... Don't let the bad/stupid comments of others influence you into defending what you have accomplished. You did great!
RckyMtHigh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
btw nipponbaka even someone with your vaunted expertise is going to have a hard time writing a book about the pistons and conrods available for a rotary engine...see what i mean by talking out of your ass?
Warblade118 1 year ago
warblade is right just a little complicated to understand thats all. it does take some thinking to understand why you have to double a rotary's engine to get a normal piston engine. rotary 1 rev = 1 power pulse (power stroke) piston 2 rev's = 1 power stroke.
drphyco500 1 year ago