Z Big Part 1 of 3

[StandUpForLiberty]

Zbigniew Brzezinski ("Zbig") is Obama's foreign policy advisor.

[cantankerouslandlord]

He's full of crap. The chief geostrategic prize for the U.S. isn't Eurasia. It's Iraq. Having control of Iraq, the U.S. controls a majority of oil and how it will be sold globally. Also, Iraq is strategically place amid all the mideastern nations. This gives the U.S. easy access to those surrounding countries. Some good reading material: The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War with Iraq: A Macroeconomic and Geo-strategic Analysis of the Unspoken Truth, by William Clark

[brettdusek]

@cantankerouslandlord He's actually right on point.

[leigero]

(prob LA). Should we so quickly dismiss his words as lies?

He is clearly taking small meaningless things and blowing them way out of proportion. Many of these memos you must realize, are written by one person only to follow one of hundreds of tedious and monotonous procedures

[johnlyman]

This video is part of a long lecture given at Portland University, called "The Truth and Lies of 911".

Let there be no mistake. The information Mr Ruppert puts forward is well researched and very compelling.

He was one of the first and the best in my opinion in connecting all the dots regarding 911, peak oil, American hegemony and globalization.

[danpt2000]

Do you people even know who Ruppert is? In another video Ruppert Claims that CIA had attempted to recruit him, but that because CIA was funneling illegal drug money into the U.S. during the War on Drugs, he decided to go public about his role and activities of CIA. He was also a narcotics investigator of some city in Calif. (prob LA). Should we so quickly dismiss his words as lies? He could be misinformed, but I doubt that he is lying.

[danpt2000]

As former Nat'l Sec. Adviser, of course ZBig would advocate hegemony of the U.S. while in that role. Whats curious is why has Zbig apparently switched sides recently?

[gosciu555]

No no, not switching sides. He hates the neocons, thats one. He hates them because they are anti intellectual, brutal and not clever. Ineffective. I think he also understands the role of the internet, in a way a medium of information flow that the central powers can't control.

[odessaboy]

Mike Ruppert is one of the most stupid men i've heard speak. There is more intelligence in one of zbig's toe nails than in Mike R. and his twin brother.

[wwwPNACATTACKcom]

no you are just moron! Keep that in mind! Michael has made story about my friend too!

[emailaromano]

lahoo zeher!

[LanysNevelesser]

Oh my goodness, it's Mike Ruppert again! lol

Global anarchy would not be a 'damn good thing right now.' Not now that it's cheaper to kill a million people than govern them if they don't agree with you.

[AmericanRevolution2]

It's been going since 1947...

[gosciu555]

what are you talking about? He's referring to the efforts of some centers of power to spread their influence an create a unipolar world. They don't respect the sovereignty of various smaller states and are walking all over them. Global Anarchy would mean that smaller states would be independent and not subjugated by bigger ones.

[LanysNevelesser]

A whole bunch of independent small states? Sounds like Europe after the Roman Empire bit it. Not my preference.

[gosciu555]

what? I'm talking about banksters who want to create control structures which are supranational.

[GregM88]

Interesting...

[AmericanRevolution2]

It's been going since 1947...

[gosciu555]

even earlier actually.