Haha, Remember how christians punished anyone proposing the earth was round! COPERNICUS, a brilliant astronomer from the fifteenth century who couldn't publish his findings thanks to Religious brutality. Earth to Christians, the universe does not revolve around you!
But then again... maybe it's good that Religious goers stay in the dark clinging to an old book that got it's people through tough times, while the rest of the world moves forward with global technical advancements.
Being born again, not of corruptible seed [still small voice?], but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. 1Peter 1:23-25
@BereanBeacon1 "what I have and you need" - in other words - "I have, and you do not have" - in other words - "in my arrogance I condider myself to have attained, and assume your knowledge of god to be null and void". Further.. "I can recite written words like a parrot, and this makes me feel certain I have impressed god to the point he will not refuse me" and perhaps- "I have recited a prayer of salvation, and this is a certain free ticket to heaven"- all are terribly simple minded notions
@gettingahandle You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
@BereanBeacon1 "spiritualy DEAD and LOVE darkness"?? Well, well, I have been exchangeing comments with an utter FOOL. All you can do is recite scripture, just as the scribes and pharicies did. That is all you have.
Such a pathetic argument, posibly showing a total lack of analytical ability, and perhaps even a lack of intelectual integrity. Sure, it can occur quickly, AND has occured "recently", but has occured on many occasions throughout the earth's LONG history. It DOES NOT help "prove" that the earth is "very young"
@BereanBeacon1 I looked at 2 of these sites/videos, NEITHER bothers to quote their sorces. Nor will I waste my time looking at your other sites/vodeos. BTW- I am convinced there is a god, but NO LONGER accept the BRAINWASHING of CHURCH CULTURE that the bible is "THE very WORD of god". Christans are a cutlure/creed that cannot handle or accept that god has not given us the full story.
@gettingahandle First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extracted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution. Not a creation site.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
I KNOW FOR A FACT that noahs ark is fully fossilised now, and is sitting on
MT avearat. This prooves not only the flood, but that the werld woz made in 7 days.
Anyway, the bible says it so that settles it. Btw, the evil catholics compiled the new testament and chucked out what they didn't like. Yet the bible is the absolute inerrant word of god. Mmm, funy that, never mind. Oh, and did you know that satan put the dinosour fossils in the ground to decieve us? Oh, or they were here with adam.
@gettingahandle All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
@giwannabe13 The argument is invalid because the theory of evolution (particularly, natural selection) does not require that older species become extinct when/if they've given rise to new ones, therefore the continued existence of (allegedly unchanging) "monkeys" is an irrelevance to the accuracy of evolution.
Youtube does not allow long enough responses to deal completely with your objections to evolution. Go do some non-creationist reading to see what evolution actually claims.
@seelybooth13 LOGIC. Some people get it backwards. ''You can make petrified wood quickly, therefore the earth is not 4,545 Million years old. Or "You can't prove there is no god''
@gregrutz it is nothing like it. Some of us left europe, the rest stayed. All monkeys would have to change. The idea that a stupid animal like a monkey turned into such a unique and amazing creature such as you and me is like saying that over trillions of years, if you drive a caprice on windy backroads, it will turn into a Ferrari. It just can't happen.
@gregrutz Ahh, but it required INTELLIGENCE to evolve them. Even if evolution IS true, it couldn't have happenned without an intellegent CREATOR who was watching, shaping, and guiding. Read up. Here are some suggestions:
Read out the Bible
Read a book by a creationist
These will help you to understand some of the things that I'm talking about. Even read the Apologia General Science book! It has valid arguments against most of the eveolutionist statements you have made.
@giwannabe13 Does a rock know which way to fall because of this INTELLIGENCE? Does an INTELLIGENCE make a snowflake have 6 sides. Does a breeding population need INTELLIGENCE to change?
@gregrutz Yes Yes and Yes. Without intellegence, there was nothing to BREED!! Without intellegence there would be nothing for the snow to fall on. Without intellegence there would be no rock to fall, and there have no gravity for it to be pulled towards. :-D
@perazh All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
Petrified wood could be made in less than 100 years and the way they recognize it is by Carbon dating. There are petrified woods hundreds of Millions of years based o the same Carbon dating method.
Tell me who has put the fossilized trees as coal 2 km under the ground???
For me you are just another pathetic idiot who was saying the Earth is flat.
@perazh But remember, Carbon Dating is not absolutely true all the time. Its accuracy is very low according to things that I have read and heard. Then again, I am biased towards creation.
@perazh Yes, and so were you. EVERYONE said that back in the day. And here's something: If we evolved from monkeys, why do we STILL see monkeys today not changing at all?
@gregrutz I am a die-hard Catastrophist. Faith in the fact that there isa God watching us, and a God that cares enough to create us as perfect beings in his image.
LOL!!! Just LOL!!! I watch creationist stuff every day just to laugh my ass off. I'm not picking on them. Really, I'm not. I don't need to. Nobody does. Just leave them alone and let them do their thing. They are, by definition, clowns. Look it up. Just sit back and enjoy the show. Just laugh. If there is a god, you KNOW he is. LOL!!! I can't wait until a few million or so years from now when they discover the first fossilized creationist!!! OMG - Farside comic!
@giwannabe13 We have fossilized people now...Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo floresiensis.
I am staying in the mountains, in a very mineral rich area, there is a lithium spring nearby. I was walking in the woods a couple of days ago and came upon large pieces of petrified wood and one planl so large three or four people could sit on it comfortably. The large plank was only partially petrified where as the smaller pieces, still larger than the piece in the picture, were fully petrified. They were all completly above ground with no sign of ever having been buried...
I am staying in the mountains in a very mineral rich area, there is a lithium spring near by. I was walking in the woods yesterday and came on some large pieces of petrified wood(bigger than in this picture). My brother and I sat on a very large piece of half petrified wood. So there were fully petrified pieces and a very large partially petrified plank side by side completly above ground, no trace of ever being buried.
The Chinle Formation at Petrified Forest National Park also has produced abundant fossil leaves, vertebrates (including giant crocodile-like reptiles called phytosaurs, large salamander-like amphibians called metoposaurs, some of the earliest dinosaur fossils from North America), and invertebrates (including freshwater snails and clams).
Here again we have Christians saying everyone has to be Christian like them or else we will burn. You forget that your Religion is taken from Ancient myths & religions long passed.
When the Earth was ruled by Saturn, Venus the mother goddess was the flower of life. She became an angry comet with disheveled hair. A Serpent that spat fire on the land. A goddess with snakes in her hair that turned the world into stone. Venus in Mythology was the comet responsible for the flood. Saturn was the God.
Speed of petrification has absolutely nothing to do with the length of time that fossils can survive.
Rapid petrification has no relevance to the mechanism of evolution.
Typically, creationist liers are trying to mix separate issues in order to confound and confuse. Creationism is a pernicious evil with the sole intention of closing down people's minds. Don't let them get to you. THINK!
Oh snap dude, please stop! Your massive ignorance is making my brain hurt and my eyes bleed from being forced to take in such raging nonsense. Learn real science before trying to pretend to know something. I wont reply because I love rock hounding and you are making a farce and an abomination out of something I love. Know this, My zeal to discredit your types has been fanned to Fusion flame temprature. One of your cronies is now going to pay for your foul tripe!
The bias is very evident. It is not that things cant be Petrified in PERFECT conditions but rather in most cases it happens very slowly. Even these people saying it CAN happen. The one thing you guys cant touch is carbon dating. Radiation is omitted at a standard and constant rate, there by making it easy to date things. Most rocks aren't much older then a few million years. But the old ones aren't hard to find, and the dates produced match space rocks, which are left over from the supernova!!!!
um carbon dating works, its weather you follow the truth of carbon dating, scietists carbon date dinosaour fossils that are only a few thousand years old, they then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! - hows that for an "exact" science?
im not talking about different methods of dating im talking about carbon dating which only measures the radiation omitted. the only dinos that lived a couple thousand years ago are the ones that still live today. Jesus=Horus=sun worship
fossils can be formed in a very short period of time, with pressure and the right conditions. if you don't believe me, look up other things pressure can do quickly (ie synthetic diamonds) science proves itself that evolution is imposible by stating itself the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Anyhow, let people think how they want it doesnt matter what humans think anyhow ;p
Petrification is the complete transformation of the wood structure by a mineral similar structure.
Fossilization is the skeleton of a living being trapped between two layers of metamorphic rocks. In fact, it's just the "print" of the animal (for instance), NOT IT'S STRUTURE.
Petrifaction may happen in a rather short time (a few cnetury, even less), while fossilization needs à very long time.
petrifaction is a form of fossilization. Takes a long time, because not much silica dissolves in water, otherwise your water glass would dissolve. Petrifaction takes longer than any creationist timeline allows. They prove creationism to be false. Silica's in almost all rock though. Most fossil wood is petrified. This is a typical misinformation production by creationism. At Florissant, the petrified wood is petrified in place, with roots in the ground.
@vanioucha Exactly. Besides, petrification takes at least 100 years to complete a small petrified tree. For a quartz crystal to grow it can grow 1mm in 12 months so it can effectively grow 10cm in just 100 years.
Whereas Evolution is a theory based on thousands of pieces of evidence that support the it. In truth most Evolutionist are thrilled when a single piece of this evidence can be shown to be more or less relevant to the theory because then the theory is refined and thus becomes more accurate.
Beyond that, even if the entirety of fossils and carbon dating could be thrown out conclusively. This is still only one small portion of the evidence for evolution theory.
This is the ultimate difference between Evolution theory and Creation belief. Creationism requires that every part of the belief system (and thats what it is, a belief system) must be true (because the bible says so).
blakjakers, both are based on faith as neither can be proven and we can only observe the present. Long ages are absolutely required for the supposed changes to have occurred and removing the petrified wood as proof is only one of many that have disproven. Another example - Evolutionists Find Rapid Magnetic Field Reversal (15 Days)! h t t p://w w w dot youtube dot com/watch?v=fn6pfzjbGHc
@BereanBeacon '' both are based on faith '' WRONG, Creationism is bases on faith, every religion has a creation story, all accepted on faith. Evolution is a process which can be observed and proven with facts like DNA markers and transitional fossils.
Even if wood could be petrified in a week, it would not prove anything.
@blakjakers That's not true; there is plenty of evidence to back creation, and the Bible is the ONLY book to pass all three of the literary document tests as well as it does. It agrees with EVERTHING, including actual landmarks. We have evidence of all the prophecies made in the Old Testament were fulfilled.
Saying that this can occur in a relatively short period of time, simply makes the fact that something IS fossilized not an indication of great age.
However fossilization is not used as an indication of age, only as a basis to look further into the possible age, via carbon dating and other techniques, that something is fossilized simply makes this possible. So this is not a case in point.
Haha, Remember how christians punished anyone proposing the earth was round! COPERNICUS, a brilliant astronomer from the fifteenth century who couldn't publish his findings thanks to Religious brutality. Earth to Christians, the universe does not revolve around you!
But then again... maybe it's good that Religious goers stay in the dark clinging to an old book that got it's people through tough times, while the rest of the world moves forward with global technical advancements.
zastawny 4 months ago
it looks scared
billymayer1000 6 months ago
Comment removed
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@gettingahandle This is what I have and you need.
Being born again, not of corruptible seed [still small voice?], but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. 1Peter 1:23-25
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
Comment removed
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 "what I have and you need" - in other words - "I have, and you do not have" - in other words - "in my arrogance I condider myself to have attained, and assume your knowledge of god to be null and void". Further.. "I can recite written words like a parrot, and this makes me feel certain I have impressed god to the point he will not refuse me" and perhaps- "I have recited a prayer of salvation, and this is a certain free ticket to heaven"- all are terribly simple minded notions
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@gettingahandle You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 "spiritualy DEAD and LOVE darkness"?? Well, well, I have been exchangeing comments with an utter FOOL. All you can do is recite scripture, just as the scribes and pharicies did. That is all you have.
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@gettingahandle Well, you can certainty go to thousands of sites that will tell you that you are ok and have nothing to be concerned about.
Are you good enough for heaven?
The Good Test - h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=7JiESHIYIJg
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
Such a pathetic argument, posibly showing a total lack of analytical ability, and perhaps even a lack of intelectual integrity. Sure, it can occur quickly, AND has occured "recently", but has occured on many occasions throughout the earth's LONG history. It DOES NOT help "prove" that the earth is "very young"
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@gettingahandle YT titles:
Green River Formation Fossil Has Original Soft Tissue
Ancient Dinosaur Blood (68,000,000 Years)
Fossil Fraud Embarrasses Scientists
Scientist Draws With Extinct Squid Ink
AMBER EXPOSES EVOLUTION
Evolution: The Itsy-Bitsy Spider
Fantastic Australian Amber Supports Young World
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 I looked at 2 of these sites/videos, NEITHER bothers to quote their sorces. Nor will I waste my time looking at your other sites/vodeos. BTW- I am convinced there is a god, but NO LONGER accept the BRAINWASHING of CHURCH CULTURE that the bible is "THE very WORD of god". Christans are a cutlure/creed that cannot handle or accept that god has not given us the full story.
gettingahandle 6 months ago
@gettingahandle How do you know you have the right god?
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@gettingahandle First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extracted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution. Not a creation site.
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
This video is made by whack jobs for whack jobs.
jw4wvu 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jw4wvu The Good Test - h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=7JiESHIYIJg
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
Rofl. That's a good one.
randomflyingpigeons 7 months ago
A friend of mine took 2 pocket fulls of petrified wood home.
wintercat2 8 months ago
When I look at cute Christian girls, my wood becomes petrified.
joiles01 9 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@joiles01 Your time is near.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
I KNOW FOR A FACT that noahs ark is fully fossilised now, and is sitting on
MT avearat. This prooves not only the flood, but that the werld woz made in 7 days.
Anyway, the bible says it so that settles it. Btw, the evil catholics compiled the new testament and chucked out what they didn't like. Yet the bible is the absolute inerrant word of god. Mmm, funy that, never mind. Oh, and did you know that satan put the dinosour fossils in the ground to decieve us? Oh, or they were here with adam.
gettingahandle 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gettingahandle All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
When will these whack jobs wake up. Noah's ark is a story of morality, again it is a story not to be taken literally.
jw4wvu 9 months ago
@giwannabe I'm calling troll. nobody be stupid enough to think "why are there still monkeys" is a valid anti-evolution argument.
blakjakau 11 months ago
@blakjakau It is too! It's just as any other argument.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 The argument is invalid because the theory of evolution (particularly, natural selection) does not require that older species become extinct when/if they've given rise to new ones, therefore the continued existence of (allegedly unchanging) "monkeys" is an irrelevance to the accuracy of evolution.
Youtube does not allow long enough responses to deal completely with your objections to evolution. Go do some non-creationist reading to see what evolution actually claims.
blakjakau 11 months ago
@blakjakau Most of the reading I do is by non-creationist authors.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 You are the IDiot who said, ''If we evolved from monkeys, why do we STILL see monkeys?''
That is like saying, ''americans came form europe, why are there still europeians?
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz Dare I ask what on earth you two are arguing about? I don't see a single common thread through any of these comments.
seelybooth13 11 months ago
@seelybooth13 LOGIC. Some people get it backwards. ''You can make petrified wood quickly, therefore the earth is not 4,545 Million years old. Or "You can't prove there is no god''
OR The Best
''religion of evolution vs. creation science
LOL
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz it is nothing like it. Some of us left europe, the rest stayed. All monkeys would have to change. The idea that a stupid animal like a monkey turned into such a unique and amazing creature such as you and me is like saying that over trillions of years, if you drive a caprice on windy backroads, it will turn into a Ferrari. It just can't happen.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 The term 'monkey' is a classification. So is ape.
Chimps, humans, gorillas and orangs. are all Apes.
All apes are still monkeys.
Modern monkeys are not the same as the monkey we all evolved from.
A caprice did not evolve into a ferrari.
The both evolved from the same common ancestor, the first car.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz Ahh, but it required INTELLIGENCE to evolve them. Even if evolution IS true, it couldn't have happenned without an intellegent CREATOR who was watching, shaping, and guiding. Read up. Here are some suggestions:
Read out the Bible
Read a book by a creationist
These will help you to understand some of the things that I'm talking about. Even read the Apologia General Science book! It has valid arguments against most of the eveolutionist statements you have made.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 Does a rock know which way to fall because of this INTELLIGENCE? Does an INTELLIGENCE make a snowflake have 6 sides. Does a breeding population need INTELLIGENCE to change?
gregrutz 11 months ago
Comment removed
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@gregrutz Yes Yes and Yes. Without intellegence, there was nothing to BREED!! Without intellegence there would be nothing for the snow to fall on. Without intellegence there would be no rock to fall, and there have no gravity for it to be pulled towards. :-D
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 What is an intellegence?
gregrutz 11 months ago
Thats very funny these crazy fanatics think earth is 10000-4000 years old. Idiots have you ever heard about carbon aging??
Do you really think Dinosaurs were living less than 10000 years ago??
You are the same the same crazies who were telling Earth is flat
perazh 1 year ago
@perazh All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1
hahahaha
you are a pathetic fanatic idiot
Remember you are talking with a scientist !
Petrified wood could be made in less than 100 years and the way they recognize it is by Carbon dating. There are petrified woods hundreds of Millions of years based o the same Carbon dating method.
Tell me who has put the fossilized trees as coal 2 km under the ground???
For me you are just another pathetic idiot who was saying the Earth is flat.
Grow some brain Idiot !
perazh 1 year ago
@perazh But remember, Carbon Dating is not absolutely true all the time. Its accuracy is very low according to things that I have read and heard. Then again, I am biased towards creation.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@perazh Yes, and so were you. EVERYONE said that.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@perazh Yes, and so were you. EVERYONE said that back in the day.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@perazh Yes, and so were you. EVERYONE said that back in the day. And here's something: If we evolved from monkeys, why do we STILL see monkeys today not changing at all?
giwannabe13 11 months ago
Trees into stone?? Duh, millions of years? Just a theory.
gregrutz 1 year ago
If you care about truth, then find potholerdebunks on youtube. He debunks this petrified artifact myth.
/watch?v=Qj0s4-v0bPE
Lachy101 1 year ago
If petification does not take millions of years, so what?
It does not change the geologic record, which proves the earth is millions of years old.
Logic people, use LOGIC.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Faith man, have a little FAITH.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 Faith in what? I have faith in uniformitarianism. But you don't know what that is.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz I am a die-hard Catastrophist. Faith in the fact that there isa God watching us, and a God that cares enough to create us as perfect beings in his image.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 Do you think Uniformatariansim means slow and grandual or uniform? Then you are wrong.
gregrutz 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz Then why do you call yourselves UNIFORMintarians?
giwannabe13 11 months ago
LOL!!! Just LOL!!! I watch creationist stuff every day just to laugh my ass off. I'm not picking on them. Really, I'm not. I don't need to. Nobody does. Just leave them alone and let them do their thing. They are, by definition, clowns. Look it up. Just sit back and enjoy the show. Just laugh. If there is a god, you KNOW he is. LOL!!! I can't wait until a few million or so years from now when they discover the first fossilized creationist!!! OMG - Farside comic!
Charliemim 1 year ago
@Charliemim wow what diet are you on,tell me and ill join you in 2 million years lol
seanmonaghan1966 1 year ago
@Charliemim You, sir, are an idiot. Look up your facts. We will probably see a fossilized person in about fifty years.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 We have fossilized people now...Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo floresiensis.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz You're proving my point. Is that intentional?
giwannabe13 11 months ago
@giwannabe13 What is your point?
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz "It is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
giwannabe13 11 months ago
I am staying in the mountains, in a very mineral rich area, there is a lithium spring nearby. I was walking in the woods a couple of days ago and came upon large pieces of petrified wood and one planl so large three or four people could sit on it comfortably. The large plank was only partially petrified where as the smaller pieces, still larger than the piece in the picture, were fully petrified. They were all completly above ground with no sign of ever having been buried...
mytubenow11 1 year ago
I am staying in the mountains in a very mineral rich area, there is a lithium spring near by. I was walking in the woods yesterday and came on some large pieces of petrified wood(bigger than in this picture). My brother and I sat on a very large piece of half petrified wood. So there were fully petrified pieces and a very large partially petrified plank side by side completly above ground, no trace of ever being buried.
mytubenow11 1 year ago
The Chinle Formation at Petrified Forest National Park also has produced abundant fossil leaves, vertebrates (including giant crocodile-like reptiles called phytosaurs, large salamander-like amphibians called metoposaurs, some of the earliest dinosaur fossils from North America), and invertebrates (including freshwater snails and clams).
All millions of years old.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Let me guess, everything is the result of a global flood. Now all they need is to prove there was a flood. No evidence.
Evolutionisisist and Darwiwnieneits don't care about trees or rocks.
GEOLOGIST SAY THE EARTH IS MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD.
G E O L O G I S T S People who study rocks their whole life.
gregrutz 2 years ago
"Here again we have "
You are right psycwaves. You will by your own sympathetic abuse of yourself.
If it isnt true then why are you trying to disprove it then??
"Suit yourself"
robwiley01 2 years ago
Here again we have Christians saying everyone has to be Christian like them or else we will burn. You forget that your Religion is taken from Ancient myths & religions long passed.
When the Earth was ruled by Saturn, Venus the mother goddess was the flower of life. She became an angry comet with disheveled hair. A Serpent that spat fire on the land. A goddess with snakes in her hair that turned the world into stone. Venus in Mythology was the comet responsible for the flood. Saturn was the God.
wavepsychic 2 years ago
have you ever watch a dog try to catch it, tail
LODZ61261 2 years ago
DING DING DING DING DING
WHOOP WHOOP
FLASHING RED LIGHTS
STRAW MAN ALERT. STRAW MAN ALERT
Speed of petrification has absolutely nothing to do with the length of time that fossils can survive.
Rapid petrification has no relevance to the mechanism of evolution.
Typically, creationist liers are trying to mix separate issues in order to confound and confuse. Creationism is a pernicious evil with the sole intention of closing down people's minds. Don't let them get to you. THINK!
BoneySkylord 2 years ago 11
this only proves evolutionist an creationist are both wrong
crazycoyotie 3 years ago
This fairly well ends the debate.
We really don't exist.
revolutionpm 2 years ago
(LOL) we exist just not when the say we do !!!!!
crazycoyotie 2 years ago
oh its a creationist so im not gonna listen because im right
Terrin123456789 3 years ago
This doesnt say anything to evolutionists (not that i am one :) the petrification process is far different from that of the fossilization of objects
GiveMeTheDamnMic101 3 years ago
this one kid petrified acorns in one year. he put them in a jar, and forgot about them. One year.
reelsask 3 years ago
hey i read about that, it was a few years ago though
Terrin123456789 3 years ago
Yes and some poor squirrels are breaking their teeth off trying to eat them.
clargdorp 2 years ago
BTW, the shroud of Turin is fake. It's estimated that the total weight of all the so called pieces of the true cross weigh over fifteen tons.
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
Oh snap dude, please stop! Your massive ignorance is making my brain hurt and my eyes bleed from being forced to take in such raging nonsense. Learn real science before trying to pretend to know something. I wont reply because I love rock hounding and you are making a farce and an abomination out of something I love. Know this, My zeal to discredit your types has been fanned to Fusion flame temprature. One of your cronies is now going to pay for your foul tripe!
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
The bias is very evident. It is not that things cant be Petrified in PERFECT conditions but rather in most cases it happens very slowly. Even these people saying it CAN happen. The one thing you guys cant touch is carbon dating. Radiation is omitted at a standard and constant rate, there by making it easy to date things. Most rocks aren't much older then a few million years. But the old ones aren't hard to find, and the dates produced match space rocks, which are left over from the supernova!!!!
pimpingonecrazy 3 years ago
um carbon dating works, its weather you follow the truth of carbon dating, scietists carbon date dinosaour fossils that are only a few thousand years old, they then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! - hows that for an "exact" science?
Terrin123456789 3 years ago
im not talking about different methods of dating im talking about carbon dating which only measures the radiation omitted. the only dinos that lived a couple thousand years ago are the ones that still live today. Jesus=Horus=sun worship
pimpingonecrazy 3 years ago
Evolutionists are 'petrified' of real science!
crazy650c 4 years ago
fossils can be formed in a very short period of time, with pressure and the right conditions. if you don't believe me, look up other things pressure can do quickly (ie synthetic diamonds) science proves itself that evolution is imposible by stating itself the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Anyhow, let people think how they want it doesnt matter what humans think anyhow ;p
grumbletiger 4 years ago
and the law of conservation
Terrin123456789 3 years ago
Petrifaction is not fossilization.
vanioucha 4 years ago
vanioucha, what is the difference?
BereanBeacon 4 years ago
Petrification is the complete transformation of the wood structure by a mineral similar structure.
Fossilization is the skeleton of a living being trapped between two layers of metamorphic rocks. In fact, it's just the "print" of the animal (for instance), NOT IT'S STRUTURE.
Petrifaction may happen in a rather short time (a few cnetury, even less), while fossilization needs à very long time.
vanioucha 4 years ago
petrifaction is a form of fossilization. Takes a long time, because not much silica dissolves in water, otherwise your water glass would dissolve. Petrifaction takes longer than any creationist timeline allows. They prove creationism to be false. Silica's in almost all rock though. Most fossil wood is petrified. This is a typical misinformation production by creationism. At Florissant, the petrified wood is petrified in place, with roots in the ground.
willsquish 4 years ago
@vanioucha Exactly. Besides, petrification takes at least 100 years to complete a small petrified tree. For a quartz crystal to grow it can grow 1mm in 12 months so it can effectively grow 10cm in just 100 years.
cwilbr 1 year ago
haha sorry about the order of my posts, never posted before and didn't realize that they would happen in reverse order,
blakjakers 4 years ago
Whereas Evolution is a theory based on thousands of pieces of evidence that support the it. In truth most Evolutionist are thrilled when a single piece of this evidence can be shown to be more or less relevant to the theory because then the theory is refined and thus becomes more accurate.
blakjakers 4 years ago
Beyond that, even if the entirety of fossils and carbon dating could be thrown out conclusively. This is still only one small portion of the evidence for evolution theory.
This is the ultimate difference between Evolution theory and Creation belief. Creationism requires that every part of the belief system (and thats what it is, a belief system) must be true (because the bible says so).
blakjakers 4 years ago
blakjakers, both are based on faith as neither can be proven and we can only observe the present. Long ages are absolutely required for the supposed changes to have occurred and removing the petrified wood as proof is only one of many that have disproven. Another example - Evolutionists Find Rapid Magnetic Field Reversal (15 Days)! h t t p://w w w dot youtube dot com/watch?v=fn6pfzjbGHc
BereanBeacon 4 years ago
@BereanBeacon ''we can only observe the present''
We have observed evolution in the present.
Fossils are in the present.
Geology is in the present.
The fact that we are Apes is in the present.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon '' both are based on faith '' WRONG, Creationism is bases on faith, every religion has a creation story, all accepted on faith. Evolution is a process which can be observed and proven with facts like DNA markers and transitional fossils.
Even if wood could be petrified in a week, it would not prove anything.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@blakjakers That's not true; there is plenty of evidence to back creation, and the Bible is the ONLY book to pass all three of the literary document tests as well as it does. It agrees with EVERTHING, including actual landmarks. We have evidence of all the prophecies made in the Old Testament were fulfilled.
giwannabe13 11 months ago
Saying that this can occur in a relatively short period of time, simply makes the fact that something IS fossilized not an indication of great age.
However fossilization is not used as an indication of age, only as a basis to look further into the possible age, via carbon dating and other techniques, that something is fossilized simply makes this possible. So this is not a case in point.
blakjakers 4 years ago
Nice!!!
powerd60153 4 years ago