Added: 4 years ago
From: UndergroundGonzo
Views: 37,749
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (498)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In this moment.. Al Qa'ida in Iraq's defeat was signed.

  • 1:00 is that Rick Santorum? at the back of Pres. Bush?

  • @rikibers I just noticed that. fuckers didnt think we would find this out

  • Now, now! Can't yall disagree with someone without cussing?

  • Now, now! Can't yall stop cussing? You can disagree with someone without talking bad about them.

  • Now, now, guys! Don't profane all over Youtube; surely yall can disagree without cussing, can't you?

  • Look at Santorum in the background God he and George are GREASY!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • the only thing i like about bush are his daughters

  • @KingFrankieD this is the type of comment I would expect from an anti-Bush moron like yourself.

  • and George W Bush was a fantastic President.. get over it. I know it's hard, I think they make an app for that now. ;)

  • @RachTrinity

    It's possible W has a photographic memory. Nonetheless, the individ. has limited intelligence but an IQ is not required when one is 'handled' 24/7. POTUS-work is not science--it is show-biz. When Pro-Wrestling was dying as a legit sport, it looked at Politics and said: "We can do this."

    You follow?

  • it amazing to me how many come here just to say awful things.. interesting.. oh how I can't wait until Jan 20, 2013 When America is FREED from the tyranny of Obama.. then oh HAPPY HAPPY DAY

  • @RachTrinity

    BUSH WAS PUSSY! - THAT'S WHY HIS NAME IS FUCKIN' BUSH! LOL! lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • worst choice america made was re-elect this dumbass

  • @soccerfan065 cause obama is sooooooo much better...pshhh

  • worst moments in america

  • @KingFrankieD 

    LOL!

  • His daughters are smokin hot.

  • bush and his white supporter are anti american and biggest traitor to our country turn surplus into debt comit treason reveal cia id lied about iraq wiretap us like fox new in engl sent jobs to ind china wat he did to this country was more destructive than bin laden in 9-11

  • President Bush took the oath in style...

  • What is with that super long conversation betweem ciccone39 and ADEAL918 that goes on for about 5 pages. Man!

  • Comment removed

  • @megamashful ADEAL918 is a gutless coward chickenhawk who gives up his liberty for security but is too big of a pussy to go serve in these wars that he supports. He wouldn't make it anyway. He's a fat-ass out of shape ugly piece of shit who would collapse after running 1/8 of a boot camp drill. I was just pointing this out to him and he's so in denial he just can't shut up. So I have to put him in his place. Look at his videos. He's the fat, ugly, long hair stumbling around who can't act.

  • @ciccone39 Nope, neither, "gutless" nor "coward" nor "chicken" nor "hawk." None of the above. Just a REALIST!!!! And nope, my audiences would say otherwise about my acting ability, and that "stumbling" was PART OF THE SCENE, YOU MORON!!!!! And my decisions regarding military service are NOBODY'S GODDAMN BUSINESS!!! Nobody likes war, sometimes people just recognize that there are madmen who need to be taken the fuck out!! And plotting terrorism is NOT a liberty, never has been, never will be

  • @ADEAL918 Just shut the fuck up you fat piece of shit! You are ugly as a pug and it's obvious you are part pug from your mom screwing a pug. Why?, because pugs eat their own shit, and you're full of shit. Every time I make a point you counter by claiming to know someone in that certain sector who would say otherwise. I state the US is a police state, you say you know people who have lived in one and would say otherwise. I say the the military is used and lied to in these bullshit wars for oil.

  • Nope, sorry, never happening. Most people who come into contact me would say I am none of the above, and I'm only full of "shit" if "shit" means acknowledgement of REALITY!!!! And yes, it quite often IS those with ACTUAL FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE who are qualified to make the statements about what things really are, and none of the paranoid bullshit you spew has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with the truth other than being the EXACT OPPOSITE of it

  • @ADEAL918 You say you know people who have been in the wars and believe their cause is what the government lies to us with through the corporate controlled/owned mainstream media. I say the police are being used to see the public as the enemy and cops wearing black swat gear for normal uniforms is proof. You say you know cops who wear that and claim they're proud to serve. I say the TSA is to turn people into slaves at the airport. Next you're going to say you know people who work for the TSA.

  • I only mentioned two categories of people I know--U.S. soldiers and those who have lived in REAL police states, and plenty of people know plenty in those categories, and THEY ARE THE ONES QUALIFIED to speak to this. As to the airport, I don't particularly care who is doing it--I don't know these people, but I am a "slave" to NOBODY, thank you very much, never have been and never will be, and my being in no way "intimidated" by actions that ensure I pose no threat does NOT make me one

  • @ADEAL918 Just shut the fuck up OK. It's obvious you're full of shit just like pugs eat their shit. I mean can't you see the pattern? You counter every point of mine by claiming to know someone from each area. Sorry, no one just happens to know all kinds of people like that. I see through you. I hand your ass to you and you have to make up stuff like you know all of those people. Bullshit. You're just a gutless, chickenhawk(Is such a word bitch), coward, slave bitch. You're just an ugly fat ass.

  • Go right ahead, keep the bullshit personal attacks coming, none of which are accurate. Most people who see me would say I'm neither ugly, nor fat, and recognition of REALITY makes NO one a "chicken" (one who is scared--I'm not), nor a "hawk"--(one who likes war--nobody does. Nor does not whining like a little baby when they make sure you pose no threat at the airport make ANYONE a "slave". And who I know is absolutely not made up.

  • @ADEAL918 And no one ever said plotting terror was a liberty. The fact that you can't wake up to is that terrorism is way over hyped and used as an excuse to pass laws to take away our freedoms like spying on people without warrants because that's how the elites believe it or not have fun in a sick way. You don't know shit. Most innocent Iraq's were killed in crossfires and caught up in explosions bu US troops. Not by their own citizens. Blackwater killed many on purpose.

  • Sorry, it's not "hyped" at all--all anyone does is quote the words of our own sick enemies, and all that has been "taken away" is THE ABILITY TO PLOT THOSE ATTACK!!!!! And anyone in the U.S military or contractors who kill civilians on purpose is PROSECUTED FOR MURDER!!! Happened multiple times you clueless freak. The so-called "elites" have bigger things to worry about than using those wiretaps for ANYTHING other than stopping terror and you can't cite ONE example of where they have

  • @ADEAL918 Just keep on being the lemming that you are. Benjamin Franklin meant by giving up liberty(Bill of Rights) for security(patriot act) you deserve neither because liberty is what creates security. Not you're bullshit slander of Ben Franklin that he meant people who were insecure in the conscience and not willing to take risks. He meant what I just explained, not your two-bit piece of shit explanation. Just shut the fuck up you fat ugly piece of shit virgin for life. Fuck you!!! Fuck you!!

  • Finding terror plots is not "spying"--it's INVESTIGATING for the purpose of SAVING LIVES!!!! And NO liberty extends to the point where exercising it puts lives in danger. When this begins to happen, the liberty has reached its legal limit--actions that SAVE LIVES are BY THEIR VERY DEFINITION NOT LOSSES OF "LIBERTIES" BECAUSE IT IS NOT A "LIBERTY" TO BE ABLE TO SECRETLY PLOT TERROR!!! And if maniacs like you got your way, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DO SO!!!!

  • And recognizing REALITIES about where ALL liberties reach their logical limit when they start to threaten people's LIVES makes NO ONE a lemming!!!! FRANKLIN DID NOT MEAN HIS WORDS TO PREVENT THE SAVING OF LIVES!!!! HE MEANT "SECURITY" IN THE ABSTRACT!!!!! And what I am or am not sexually is NOBODY'S GODDAMN FUCKING BUSINESS BUT MY OWN!!!!! YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I AM OR AM NOT AND I WILL NOT STOOP TO YOUR LEVEL OF DISCUSSING IT!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 "And what I am or am not sexually is NOBODY'S GODDAMN FUCKING BUSINESS". Yeah now I know what you are. You're probably just like that former assistant Penn State coach who got caught raping those young boys. I'm willing to bet you like to fuck young boys in the ass. You're sick. I pray for those kids well being.

  • @ADEAL918 Yuppies are always like "uh, uh, uh yeah take my freedoms, it's better than being blown up" whenever there is a scare. I don't know if you're rich but you react just like a yuppie so that is why I call you a yuppie. By the way, Jesse Ventura is suing the TSA and DHS for violating his Constitutional rights. I can't wait until he wins. Then it's in your face fatt ass! Yeah!

  • Then I'm no "yuppie"--because I never told ANYONE to take away my freedoms. I just recognize that since I'M NOT PLOTTING TERRORISM, NO ONE CARES A SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING THEY MIGHT FIND FROM ME SO I DON'T HAVE TO BE ALL PARANOID ABOUT IT!!!! I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, AND THEREFORE, NO LIBERTIES TO LOSE BECAUSE PLOTTING TERRORISM IS NOT A FREEDOM!!!! I've got some legal background, by the way, and Jesse will be LAUGHED OUT OF COURT, and likely fined for wasting the court's time pal.

  • @ADEAL918 You also show what a dumbshit you are by always taking long to respond. You claim it's because you don't care and finally respond when you're board. Bullshit! It's because you're a stupid moron fat ass who has to take that long to think of what to type. That's it, I'm done with you. I'm going to go fuck my girlfriend. Don't respond back to me anymore I'm through with you you fat ass piece of shit! Fuck you!!! Fuck you!!!

  • I take long to respond because I HAVE BIGGER THINGS TO DO THAN TRY TO TALK SOME SENSE TO CLUELESS, LIFE ENDANGERING FREAKS LIKE YOU!!!!! I do it for shits and giggles to see how clueless people can truly be, but YOU WILL NEVER SHUT ME UP, SO BE "THROUGH WITH ME" BY SHUTTING YOUR OWN FILTH-SPEWING, INACCURATE PERSONAL ATTACKING MOUTH, YOU SICK, PARANOID FREAK!!!!!!! OOOOOH, GO RUN AWAY FROM THE BOOGEYMEN AT THE AIRPORT AND THE ONES WHO MAKE SURE YOU AREN'T PLOTTING TERROR!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 And just one more thing. There's a big difference between a doctor feeling you genitals and the TSA groping them. Your relationship with your doctor is personal, professional and private. And doctors are highly educated and trained in a little thing you may of heard of call ethics. The tow-bit rent-a-cop TSA thugs are not. TSA are just thugs to intimidate and make you submit to being a slave. You have no dignity being willing to give into this garbage. There is no threat.

  • @ciccone39 SO ARE THOSE TASKED WITH MAKING SURE THOSE BOARDING PLANES DON'T POSE A THREAT TO IT!!!! THEY ARE TRAINED IN ETHICS AS WELL!!!! Yes, occasionally they violate those ethics, but I can point to a few doctors who have done the same. NOT A REASON TO PUT LIVES IN DANGER!!!!! MAKING SURE I POSE NO THREAT TO THE AIRPLANE I'M ABOUT TO BOARD MAKES NO ONE A "SLAVE" PAL!!!!! And sorry, but if you don't see the threat, you are BLIND, DEAF, AND DUMB

  • @ADEAL918 It's just more slave training and you're too much of a lemming to see that from the TSA. Nothings going to happen without pat downs and naked x-ray machines. Just all slave training to break your will and dominate you. And I'm not the one who's intimidated or dominated by this stuff at airports or cops wearing swat uniforms. Why? Because I acknowledge these facts. You don't and that's why you're dominated and weak willed. Once again that's it. Don't respond back anymore. Fuck you!!!

  • It DID happen on 9/11, and only through amazing luck has it been avoided happening several times since then pal, and recognizing that REALITY makes NO ONE a "lemming"--it makes us people who live in the REAL WORLD--WHICH ISN'T ALWAYS PRETTY!!!!!  Nobody's going to "dominate" me pal, and if you can be "dominated" by making sure you pose no threat to the airplane you're about to step on, then you're pretty goddamn pathetic!!!! I'M TOO STRONG-WILLED TO BE "DOMINATED" BY SAFETY MEASURES!!

  • @ADEAL918 Once again one more thing. In the past I mentioned the middle east wars are bullshit like Vietnam for profit of the military industrial complex by sustaining them for as long as possible. You then gave some dumbass response that the difference is that this enemy is willing to go down whereas the enemy in Vietnam wasn't? That makes no sense you dumbass which proves what a stupid piece of shit you are. If someone is willing to go down that means they're willing to lose.

  • You are REALLY pathetic--being intimidated by the CLOTHES people wear when they make sure you pose no threat to the plane you are about to board. AND NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO BOARD A PLANE WITHOUT THIS BEING MADE GODDAMN CERTAIN BUSTER!!!!!! And NOBODY has their "will broken" (their will to do WHAT?? COMMIT TERROR!!! YES, THAT'S THE JOB OF THE SCREENINGS!!!!) That "sustaining as long as possible" is pretty hilarious since we're trying to get OUT as soon as possible buster

  • The enemy in Vietnam was willing to lose individuals for the triumph of their country. The current enemy would be perfectly happy to take their ENTIRE COUNTRY AND GROUP OF COUNTRIES down as long as we go down with them. VERY DIFFERENT THAN VIETNAM!!!!! And I use the word Jihad as OUR ENEMIES THEMSELVES DEFINE IT!!!!! i'm well aware that the greater Muslim culture doesn't acknowledge that concept, BUT THEY AREN'T THE PROBLEM HERE--BUT THERE'S PLENTY WHO ARE!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 No one fights a war to lose you dumbshit. Spare me any bullshit explanation that you were somehow being metaphoric or something like that, just like when you use the word jihadist for radical Muslims and claim it's because they don't represent true jihad? I told you, there is no such word in the Muslim culture as jihadist. Spare me your bullshit once again. And once again don't reply back anymore. I'm through with you you dumb fat ass piece of shit virgin! Fuck you!!! Fuck You!!!

  • Nope sorry, neither dumb nor fat, and what I am or am not sexually is NONE OF YOUR GODDAMN FUCKING BUSINESS AND I WILL NOT LOWER MYSELF TO DISCUSSING THAT WITH YOU, YOU SICK SON OF A BITCH!!!! NOW SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH!!!!! YOU WILL NEVER SHUT ME UP, SO BE "THROUGH WITH ME" BY SHUTTING YOUR FILTH SPEWING PARANOID WEAK-MINDED DOMINATABLE-BY-BLACK-CLOTHING MOUTH!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 You're nothing but an ugly fat tub of shit who will never get laid. You'll never stick your dick in a pussy. Ha ha! And you are the lemming. You are dominated, because you go right along with it. Think about it?, the TSA clearly is full of power tripping lowlifes. They don't accommodate one bit and won't let you ask why. If you don't comply you are then threatened. By you bowing to this you are dominated and weak. It's all to boss people around and nothing else. Wake up!

  • @ADEAL918 Hey everyone reading this, Mr. Adams(ADEAL918) is a fat tub of shit. Mr. Adams lives in fear. Mr. Adams gives up his liberty for security. Mr. Adams is a gutless coward! Mr. Adams is a fat tub of shit. Mr. Adams lives in fear. Mr. Adams gives up his liberty for security. Mr. Adams is a gutless coward! Mr. Adams is a fat tub of shit. Mr. Adams lives in fear. Mr. Adams gives up his liberty for security. Mr. Adams is a gutless coward! Look at his videos. He's the ugly fatass.

  • @ciccone39 ok

  • Thanks to the liberal educators getting control of our school system, the population is dumbed down considerable. Unfortunately, the morons are getting elected to office, as shown by George W. Bush, and the near-miss of Sarah Palin in 2008.

  • He must have had his fingers crossed.

  • I know why people hate Bush. It's because he's a badass SOB who ain't gonna let anyone fuck with the USA.

  • That was the longest fart joke I've ever heard.

  • Chief Justice Rehnquist was a great and honorable man.

  • I never liked Bush for what he did in Iraq and Afghanistan.That being said,2005 was probably in my book the best year of the decade.Does anyone else agree?

    Can't believe five years have passed!

  • 2005 wasnt a good year for the gulf coast fyi hurricane katrina

  • lmao... just seconds after the oath Rehnquist walks away as if he is thinking... what tha f ever... lmao

  • @JeroDadude Chief Justice couldn't shake hands because he had a trac in his throat, but after securing gloves he shook the hands of Bush

  • God Bless George W. Bush

  • @freakylocz14 lol

  • Worst President in 200 years

  • he made one mistake and u call him the worst ever?  do u know every president?

  • @nzisaac ONE mistake...only ONE?!?! What do you view as the " ONE" mistake he made in 8 dreadful years- and I voted for him twice!

  • @nzisaac I personally think the Americans and the world are way too hard on Adolf Hitler, sorry I mean Geor.... nvm same person

  • @iamborat100 sad but true...

  • I/20/01 and 1/20/05 TWO dates that will live in infamy.

  • like him of hate him, it doesn't matter. He did what had to be done, he fought back against those terrorists as hard as he could and won the Iraq war. Iraq is a now a victory story. All you people who were saying we would lose by 2004, in your face nigga!

  • @warjunkie44 lol!

  • George W. Bush who claimed to be a conservative, tripled the size of the federal government, shredded the Constitution, and destroyed the image of the United States worldwide. In an interview back in 2000, Mr. Bush stated how Bill Clinton embarrassed our country. I ask all of you, what's worse, Clinton lying about a blow job, or Bush violating the Constitution, lying to go to war, allowing torture, and basically murdering one million Iraqis?

  • AMEN to that! What a sad day 1-20-05.. another stolen term in office by a man who had such an arrogant disregard for the obligations of his oath. "Preserve, protect & defend.." my ass! Better yet his ass...as he defecated all over the Constitution on a daily basis...bastard!

  • get out of here hippie!

  • Yeah i know what you're like - "Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! We gotta go fight Al Qaeda, and then let's give up our liberty for security! I got nothing to hide. The government can listen in on my phone anytime. Sometimes to have freedom you gotta give up freedom!" - The idiot type redneck people like yourself that believe everything your government tells you is beyond sad. These wars you have a hard-on for are all part of the New World Order's plan. You better decide what side you're one.

  • Hahahahaha. I'm Latino you ass! Redneck, that was great though. Peace, and dont expect me to dignify you with another answer.

  • Peace! How 'bout that Mark Sanchez!

  • @ciccone39 Nothing in the constitution prevents saving lives at any cost. There were no "lies" to go to war--the intelligence on WMD's was there and we had every reason to believe it. It turned out to be wrong. That does not make a "lie." That requires a deliberate act of deception, which this was not. Same way "murder" requires INTENT to kill, and the only Iraqis we had any intent to kill were terrorists. Most of the others by the way, were killed by their own countrymen in insurgent attacks

  • @ADEAL918 First of all, read up on both the Manning Memos and the Downing Street Memos. You'll more then find out how there was knowledge and proof that there were no WMD's before the war and how Bush told T. Blair that WMD's being found was highly unlikely. Also read the 2002 NIE where 16 US intelligence agencies concluded that Saddam was NOT a threat to the US. Terrorists? What terrorists from Iraq attacked the US? Bush tried to claim SH was in 9/11, but admitted he wasn't after lying he was.

  • @ciccone39 I've read them--they refer to specific pieces of intelligence that were called into question before the war started. They say NOTHING about the overall picture of the intelligence that was being painted, which indicated they were there. Even Saddam's OWN HENCHMEN believed the weapons were there. Whatever the "16 agencies" said, the CIA was not one of them, and they are the ones whose word has always been given the most weight. Saddam HAD threatened the U.S. with destruction.

  • @ciccone39 That, sir, makes him a terrorist. Bush never said he was involved in 9/11, he said there had been some meetings between Saddam's henchmen and Al-Qaida officials about generally collaborating in future attacks, which was true. He NEVER said he had anything to do with 9/11. So the terrorists we were trying to kill were Saddam and his henchmen and supporters. As to the Ben Franklin quote, the poor man is rolling over in his grave at his words being perverted like this.

  • @ciccone39 Also, upon another reading of the Downing Street memo, it also becomes clear that it was a reference only to U.S. intelligence, which was nowhere near the only intelligence community that was seemingly credibly concluding at the time that the WMD's were there. Several other nations' independent top intelligence agencies came to that same conclusion, and were equally shocked when the weapons were not found (once again, to say nothing of Saddam's OWN HENCHMEN!!!!!)

  • ADEAK918 is a casualty of fear, piece of shit YUPPIE! 918 is in denial and can't realize how much he/she lives in fear. 918 continues to give up liberties for his/her all precious security because 918 believes having your phone tapped is about saving lives. Wake up you weak willed puke. It's all about exploiting tragedies so the control freak government can spy on you. Just keep living in fear and denial you YUPPIE! Our founding fathers are spinning in grave because of yuppies like yourself. KMA

  • @ciccone39 Nope, I refuse to be a casualty of those who fail to acknowledge the world we live in and what it takes to confront REAL WORLD THREATS!!! And yes, those phone taps ARE about saving lives. It's how we uncovered the Brooklyn Bridge and Library Tower plots and have NEVER been used for ANYTHING else. The founding fathers are spinning in their graves because of YOU perverting the definition of "freedom" in a way that puts LIVES IN DANGER!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 You just can't get it through your head that many counter-terrorism experts have expressed doubt that the plot on the LA building was ever fully developed or likely to occur. "The President is full of shit" one expert commented.

  • @ciccone39 And the 9/11 plot would have seemed equally as far-fetched had we also been able to uncover it before it was "fully developed" and anyone citing it as a threat might have also seemed to be "full of shit." What YOU can't get through YOUR head is that THIS IS THE WHOLE EVER FUCKING POINT!!!! To stop these sick, twisted plots in their tracks long BEFORE they reach the operative stage, and this is EXACTLY what we now have the tools to do, which you psychopaths want to take away.

  • @ADEAL918 ADEAL918 is a gutless, coward, chickenhawk casualty of fear piece of shit yuppie! That is all you are! The founding fathers are turning in their graves because of weak pieces of shit like yourself! Not because people like me uphold their beliefs but because shitheads like you believe what they spoke of means something else then what they actually spoke. You're nothing but a weak willed conformist! I got $10,000 that says you're still a virgin judging by how your comments read you puke!

  • @ciccone39 None of the above buster. They never "spoke" ANYTHING that suggests that ANYTHING in their founding documents were EVER meant to be construed as a suicide pact or anything that was meant to stop the saving of innocent lives when it is possible only through controversial means. They were PERFECTLY clear that when a right gets to the point where it infringes on a more basic right (like, oh I dunno, the right to LIFE!!!) that more basic right takes precedence

  • @ciccone39 And recognition of a few simple FACTS about what protecting innocent lives sometimes entails makes NO ONE "gutless" or a "coward" or a "casualty of fear" or a "chickenhawk." It makes someone an acknowledger of REALITY!!!! And my sexual status either way is none of your goddamn fucking business, nor is it relevant to this issue

  • @ADEAL918 The fact of the matter is that what we are told about terrorism is false. Yes bad guys do exist but they are not the level of threat we are told. It's all exploited to put us under lock and key and to take away our freedoms that you are in denial about. It's guilty until proven innocent when it's supposed to be the other way around. However you fall for all the fear tactics and buy it!

  • @ciccone39 No one has ANY desire to take away ANY "freedoms" other than the "freedom" to secretly plot terrorism against innocents without the government being able to find out about it so we can stop it in its tracks. We're not talking about using any of this to convict anyone of anything--only to STOP an impending action

  • @ADEAL918 You sound just like George Bush on everything. Everything you say he said and just like him you just say the same thing but never give details. To you all you ever say is "to save lives", "they're TOOLS used to fight terror, tools some want to take away". Just like Bush you believe that changing a word justifies doing something that would of been illegal before. To you and Bush it's not "spying on people, we're using TOOLS". "Waterboarding isn't torture' it's enhanced interrogation".

  • @ciccone39 And Bush was right about certain things. I never voted for the man, and there's PLENTY I disagree with him on. But when it comes to saving lives, that's EXACTLY what we have to do, by an means necessary. And that, sir, is NEVER illegal. When something is done for the specific purpose of saving lives, that overrides ANY "illegality" it might have. COurts of law have recognized this time and time and time and time again.

  • @ADEAL918 All you do is change a word to cover your ass and justify illegal acts. The fact is the United States is more than capable of preventing terror with what was in place before 9/11 with the Constitution intact! The 9/11 commission is a quack that was written to read the way the government wanted it to read to scare all of you weaklings. I suggest you read Fletcher Prouty's book "The Secret Team" on how all of this is caused by black-ops involving the shadow elements of the CIA. Wake up!

  • @ciccone39 Considering that we DIDN'T prevent 9/11, that argument pretty much goes STRAIGHT OUT THE FUCKING WINDOW!!!!!! We didn't have what we needed to stop it, now we do. PERIOD!!!!! I'm not interested in vanity books. I'm interested in what actually HAPPENED!!!! which we may not know every single bloody detail, but the 9/11 Commission is about as close as it gets. And that's funny your claimed intention, because for most, the 9/11 Commission ALLEVIATED fear rather than caused it

  • @ciccone39 Because it made clear to most of us out in the sanity and reality-based community that they understood for the most part where we screwed up in preventing 9/11 from happening, and that those mistakes will NOT be made again, no matter how blinded to reality psychopaths like you may be.  There is no liberty if your life isn't protected, and what they meant by "liberty or death" was that they would fight for liberty against those trying to keep it from them by controlling their lives.

  • @ADEAL918 The founding fathers are turning in their graves because America and the Constitution has always been about liberty or death to them but yuppies like yourself are helping to destroy our once great country(I'm sorry, to you America is not a country, America is "the homeland"). All this terrorism is 99% bullshit and you need to wake up!

  • @ciccone39 They did NOT mean not being able to protect our citizens (in whatever you call it, America, the Homeland, I don't particularly care what term you use) and that somehow being able to do so violates your perverted definition of "freedom" or "liberty"--being able to secretly plot terrorism is NOT "liberty" or "freedom"!!!!!! If you value your life so pathetically little that you'll sacrifice it for this perverted definition, then fine, go fucking kill yourself.

  • @ciccone39 But GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY OF SAVING THE LIVES OF THOSE WHO DO VALUE THEIR LIVES AND THOSE OF THEIR LOVED ONES AND FELLOW COUNTRYMEN ENOUGH TO RECOGNIZE THAT BEING ABLE TO SAVE SAID LIVES DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY LOSSES OF WHAT THE FOUNDERS ACTUALLY MEANT BY THOSE TERMS THAT YOU'RE PERVERTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The MULTIPLE attacks that we've thwarted since 9/11 with the tools YOU would take away are NOT "bullshit" buster. They're REALITY, no matter how much you deny it

  • And the only thing making the founding fathers turn in their graves is psychopaths like you who will cause the DESTRUCTION of this nation in defense of a perverted definition of "liberty" and "freedom" that they NEVER intended those terms to mean. You are FUCKING PATHETIC!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 You must have one massive ego to be so obsessed to reply in the manner that you do. I told you before, all you do is repeat Bush word for word with things like "tools", and "save lives". But you never back it up with details. I've told you time and time again how what you call tools are illegal and how 9/11 was preventable with what was in place before and how 9/11 didn't happen because your precious "tools" didn't exist then.

  • @ciccone39 No sir, I do not. There was PLENTY I disagreed with Bush on. But NOT when it came to saving lives at any cost. And I HAVE backed it up with "details" and then you just say they didn't happen that way. You show me where the founding fathers EVER!!!!! EVER!!!!!! EVER!!!!! said it was "illegal" to save lives. NEWS FLASH!!!! THEY NEVER DID, BECAUSE IT NEVER IS!!!!!!! The fact that 9/11 was extremely NOT prevented SHOOTS YOUR ARGUMENT THAT IT WAS "PREVENTABLE" STRAIGHT TO HELL!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer of project able danger uncovered two of the 9/11 cells a full year before but the federal government told him to shut up. Richard Clarke explained exactly how Bush and his stooges sat on their asses ignoring warning signs, not holding meetings. And if they would have, more then likely 9/11 could very well of been stopped.

  • @ciccone39 No it could not have, because the necessary tools WERE NOT IN PLACE!!!!! Without those tools, it didn't matter what they did. Yes, BOTH SIDES, ignored warning signs--kinda like what you nutcases continue to do ten years later

  • @ADEAL918 You're wrong. Courts have never said all you have to do is cry "to save lives" and the law doesn't apply as far as illegal goes. Courts on many occasions bring charges on feds and cops that violate the Constitution. I told you. This is all an excuse to put us under lock and key, keep tabs on everybody, and slowly more and more take away our freedoms. But you are still in denial because you are weak gutless coward who falls for everything the government and controlled media tells you.

  • @ciccone39 Courts have NEVER rejected the validity of sometimes done to save lives. SHOW ME A TIME THEY HAVE!!!!!!!!!! In certain cases they may rule that there was a very CLEAR-CUT alternative to the illegal action and thus the action remains illegal because it was not, in fact, necessary to save these lives. But there was no such thing in the case of 9/11. NO CLEAR CUT WAY TO STOP IT!!!! HOW WERE WE SUPPOSED TO FIND OUT THE WHO, WHERE, WHEN AND HOW???????

  • No one wants to put ANYONE "under lock and key." We are free to do whatever our hearts desire, so long as we are not threatening anyone else, and that's ALL any of these measures are intended to determine--who this is. I enjoy EVERY SINGLE GODDAMN FREEDOM I ENJOYED ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2001!!!! YOU KNOW WHY?? BECAUSE I'M NO TERRORIST!!!! THOSE WITH NOTHING TO HIDE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR!!!!! AND YOU'RE THE ONE CREATING BULLSHIT FEAR WITH THE BOOGEYMAN OF "LOST FREEDOMS" while ignoring REAL threats

  • @ADEAL918 The 9/11 commission alleviate fear? All they did was create more fear. Their recommendations were all basically naked body scan and fingerprint everyone at airports or else you'll be blown up. Bullshit! I told you before many commission members admitted it was set to fail from the beginning. And set up to fail means set up to fail. It doesn't mean something else. The head of the commissions legal team admitted the government never wanted the truth to be told. These are FACTS!

  • You've got a pretty damn funny way of having "more fear created" by demonstrating where we went wrong and showing that they weren't going to allow it to happen again. Yes, the government didn't want the "truth" to be told--that truth being that things were handled so incredibly incompetently from the beginning and the tools needed were not in place and that it was time to WAKE THE FUCK UP TO REALITY!!!! And whoever "controls" the media, it wasn't anyone who had anything good to say about Bush

  • @ADEAL918 Their words don't mean something else like you always claim. "Set up to fail" means "set up to fail". "Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither" means just that. Not some reverse psychology bullshit you always try and pull where those people said that and although it sounds like what it reads it actually means something else. You're the one who is pathetic. You're nothing but a casualty of fear mongering by Bush, Obama etc.

  • @ciccone39 No I am not a "casualty of fearmongering" because recognizing REALITY is not "fearmongering"--it's called BEING A GROWN UP AND LIVING IN THE REAL WORLD!!!!! And no, these statements don't "sound like they read" when looked at in CONTEXT!!!!! EVER HEARD OF IT???? Yes, it was "set up to fail" in that an investigation that size will always leave stones unturned, and as to Franklin, he said "essential" liberty. AND PLOTTING TERRORISM IN SECRET IS NO SUCH THING BUDDY!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Jesus H. Christ. Just sack it you phony. It takes you weeks to reply because you probably type your comments on Word, look them over, then copy and paste them here. No you don't give details. You just use the word tools but like Bush know that in detail they are illegal, spying measures. They are not to save lives. They've never been about that. It's all to spy on people because most people in DC government are power tripping, control freaks. That's what it's about.

  • @ciccone39 I'VE GIVEN YOU SPECIFICS OF HOW THOSE TOOLS HAVE SAVED LVIES, AND THEN YOU DENY THEY EVER HAPPENED!!!!!!! I CAN'T ARGUE THAT WAY WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS NO RESPECT FOR FACTS!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Yes courts have thrown out many times when civil rights have been violated. Read up on Brandon Mayfield. Cops have tortured confessions out of people before just to get someone to confess and judges throw out that evidence. You are just like Bush. Tools. That's all you say. Tools, tools, tools. Nothing else. Waterboarding is torture not a tool. Torture is against the law mother fucker! No one is going to die if it's not done. You are just a chicken-necked, limp-wristed yuppie!

  • @ciccone39 Confessions are not an issue with saving lives. There's a difference between intelligence gained to CONVICT someone and intelligence gained to STOP AN IMPENDING ACTION!!!!!!!!!! And yes, sometimes the necessary tools can get to be dirty business. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT!!!!????? OUR CITIZENS LIVES ARE THAT IMPORTANT!!!!!!! And yes, people WOULD have died without the waterboarding of KSM!!!!! THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED OVER AND OVER THAT WE GOT INTELLIGENCE FROM DOING SO THAT SAVED LIVES!!!

  • @ADEAL918 And yes you are a yuppie. Because it is yuppies that are so weak willed that you are all always like "uhuhuh, uhuhuh, ohohoh, yes listen to my phone calls. We need naked body scanners not just in airports, but in malls and museums as well" If they're not their we're going to be blown up". Saying if you got nothing to hide you don't have to worry is the ultimate sign of cowering. And you prove that by admitting that and that proves you're a weak ass yuppie!

  • @ciccone39 BECAUSE NO ONE GIVES A SHIT WHAT I'M SAYING ON THE PHONE, BECAUSE I'M NO TERRORIST YOU SON OF A BITCH!!!!!! That's the OPPOSITE of "cowering" buster. YOU'RE THE ONE COWERING (and a bit narcissistic because you really think the government gives a rat's shithole what you're doing or saying). I'm saying BRING IT THE FUCK ON!!! That's saying they WON'T do anything to my liberties, because I'm not planning any harm and doing so, FOR THE LAST TIME, IS NOT A "LIBERTY!!!!!!!!!"

  • @ADEAL918 You know what, I'm not even angry in disagreement with you. I actually feel sorry for you. Because you have NO backbone. You just fall for all the fear tactics but call it reality. This has nothing to do with "no one has the right to plot terrorism". This all about scaring you into an Orwellian 1984, Galactic Empire police state. And yes we do live in a police state. Those who live in the US from foreign police states just moved to a not yet fully established one yet bitch!

  • @ciccone39 Look buster, I know people who have lived in REAL "OREWELLIAN POLICE STATES," moron --many of whom SAW THE PROCESS BY WHICH THEY DEVELOPED and they would LAUGH YOU OUT OF THE ROOM with a bullshit argument like that. The definition of a "police state" is NOT a place where they can stop terrorism. YOU'RE THE ONE WITH NO "BACKBONE" BECAUSE YOU DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR LIFE--FINE, BUT BACK THE FUCK OFF OF SAVING THE REST OF OUR LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 9/11 was preventable. Bullshit things weren't in place. The 1993 NYC landmark bomb plot was foiled without spying. The 1999 US airliner plot was stopped and one of those involved arrested at LAX. No spying. The millennium bomber caught in 1999. No spying bitch! Richard Clarke fully explained how the trees were shaken in all of these cases. Bush was not calling meetings on terror as Clarke admitted.

  • @ADEAL918 Col. Anthony Shaffer in operation Able Danger uncovered two of the 9//1 cells a full year before but was told to shut up by the feds. Detailed fact right there bitch! You give no detail. Just tools tools tools. In denial it's about spying on the US. Not to stop terror boogeymen.

  • @ADEAL918 And yes you are full of shit. There never was any LA building plot. Never! That plot was supposedly stopped in mid-2002. But Bush didn't reveal it until 2006. First off then California Gov. Gray Davis admitted he was simply told when the plot was supposedly foiled that it was nothing more then someone asking someone else "what about that as a target" but it never went any further and no need to worry.

  • AND 9/11 NEEDED TO BE STOPPED WHEN IT WAS AT THAT STAGE TOO!!!!! OTHERWISE IT WAS TOO LATE!!!!!!!! And it wasn't only that case, it was several others too, including the Brooklyn Bridge case, which was farther along in the planning at the time. And the fact that certain attacks were foiled before is NOT proof that any could have been. OUR ENEMIES ADAPT--THAT MEANS WE HAVE TO AS WELL, AND WE WERE NOT DOING THAT!!!!! NO AMOUNT OF "MEETINGS" WITH WHAT WE HAD AT THE TIME WOULD HAVE STOPPED IT

  • @ADEAL918 Then, five to six intelligence/terror experts who remember the exact incident admitted it was the same as what the governor was told. One said Bush was full of shit. And not because as you would say "it was prevented and if 9/11 was prevented and Clinton or Bush said there was a 9/11 plot foiled those same would of said full of shit". NO! It's because there never was any plot bitch!

  • @ciccone39 And anyone who called attention to the 9/11 plot when it was at that early stage of simply talking about possible targets would have been called "full of shit" as well. But they wouldn't have been, they just would have been in the practice of stopping these sick twisted plots in their tracks well BEFORE they become an imminent, serious threat

  • @ADEAL918 Had there been a plot foiled, people would have arrested as you claim were but none were. Never! if people would of been arrested it would been in the news and those people would of been put on trial and that too would of been reported. It never happened yuppie. You are full of shit! Why did Bush claim this? Simple. The Democrats were poised to take congress back in the '06 elections which they did and he was trying to say "see we Reps. are strong on terror. we stopped this in '02".

  • @ciccone39 ONCE AGAIN, THAT'S BECAUSE IT WAS STOPPED IN ITS TRACKS BEFORE THE PLOT EVEN HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE SHAPE!!!!!!! LIKE 9/11 SHOULD HAVE BEEN!!!!!!!! And once again, this was only one of several (that we know about) not to mention all the others we AREN'T routintely told about. By the way, the Brooklyn Bridge plot (which we found out about the same way) most certainly DID have arrests connected to it. Information we NEVER could have gotten in a pre-9/11 world

  • @ADEAL918 It was all more fear mongering to scare all you yuppies once again to keep letting yourselves be spied on but of course be in denial about it like always. The Downing Street memos did clearly state how there never were any WMD and the Manning memos clearly state how Bush told Blair in private that no WMD will be found. Just wake up. It's all a farce to scare you so those in power can spy on you and so wars drag on for the profit of the military industrial complex.

  • @ciccone39 No sir, it was not "fearmongering"--it was called WAKING UP TO THE REAL WORLD!!!! GET WITH IT!!!! NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU OR I OR ANYONE ELSE WHO MEANS NO HARM TO ANYONE IS DOING OR SAYING!!!!!!!!! And plenty of other sources from the intelligence communities of MULTIPLE nations (including Saddam's own henchmen) have acknowledged that they had reason to believe he DID have the WMD's--he hoodwinked even his own men, so it makes perfect sense that he could hookwink others too

  • @ciccone39 I've provided you the FACTS about those other plots as well, and you don't care about how things really are, so once again, I can't argue with someone like that, because when something is inconvenient for you, you'll just pretend it doesn't exist. That's not the real world buster. I hope you start living in it one day. Until then SHUT THE FUCK UP AND QUIT WASTING MY TIME!!!! PAWN YOUR PARANOID PROPAGANDA OFF ON SOMEONE UNINFORMED ENOUGH TO FALL FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 And I'm 99% sure you've never served your country you gutless coward yuppie! Our country is going right toward a real life Running Man but bitches like you are the ones destroying our country by supporting measures(or tools like you would say) like these that are making our founding fathers spin in grave. It has nothing to do with saving lives and stopping terror. That's the farce. It's to soy and control all of us bitch.

  • @ciccone39 What I have or have not done is IRRELEVANT AND NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!!!! What's important is MY EYES ARE OPEN AND I KNOW HOW THINGS REALLY ARE!!!!! FOR THE LAST TIME, NO ONE GIVES TWO SHITS OUT OF AS RAT'S ASSHOLE WHAT YOU OR I OR ANYONE ELSE NOT PLOTTING SLAUGHTER OF THOUSANDS SAYS OR DOES!!!!! THEY HAVE BIGGER FISH TO FRY THAN THAT!!!! I have no idea what you're "Running Man" reference means, because I live in the REAL WORLD!!!! MOVIES ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 What did all the founding fathers warn? That the fall of America wouldn't come from outside forces, but rather when political parties take over our country and destroy what the fathers created. And it's happening with what you call tools. There is video here on YT that shows cops telling a small group of demonstrators at the US Capitol "you don't have freedom of speech". God damn it, you don't need a permit. The first amendment protects protesters.

  • @ciccone39 Yeah, like destroying what their words actually meant and start using their words to prevent preserving the very survival of the nation itself. They knew we'd always be able to do this, provided we didn't hesitate to do so. THAT would be how we would be destroyed. Yes, the final blow would be struck by an outside enemy, but we WILL have destroyed ourselves from the inside by making ourselves powerless to prevent the external destruction.

  • @ciccone39 Yes, it protects protesters, but ever heard of TIME AND PLACE CONSTRAINTS!!!!! Every single freedom has such things, and that also includes when those freedoms threaten people's very LIVES, which is why it is NEVER "illegal" to save lives

  • @ADEAL918 There's also a video on here showing mall cops threatening to use the patriot act on people who are handing out fliers at a mall unless they show ID. That act is supposed to be a TOOL for terror suspects, but clearly here it is being used non-terror US citizens. You're wrong bitch! Wake up yuppie bitch! You're in denial and you'll never have a clue.

  • @ciccone39 Key question here--WHAT KIND OF "FLYERS" WERE THEY HANDING OUT??????? I'm an in RECOGNITION OF REALITY--not "denial" And by the way, cops have a right to ask for ID. OH, WHAT A "LOSS OF LIBERTY"--PEOPLE HAVE TO SHOW ID!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Just shut the fuck up. Your reverse psychology mind trick tactics will not work on me boy/girl! Yes you are weak not living in the "real world". By saying bring it on, listen to my calls you are cowering. You have no inner strength. Why do think cops more and more just taser people at will for simply asking why they were pulled over? Because the US is a police state where the police are being hardened to intimidate and instill fear not to serve and to protect.

  • @ciccone39 Cops can be power freaks--I didn't deny that. But that's not about government policy. YOU'RE the one who needs to SHUT THE FUCK UP and get the hell out of the way of saving lives!!!!! And YET AGAIN, I KNOW PEOPLE WHO HAVE ACTUALLY LIVED IN REAL POLICE STATES BUDDY, AND THEY KNOW FULL WELL THAT WE BEAR PRECISELY ZERO!!!!!! ZERO!!!!!!! ZERO!!!!!!! resemblance to one. And no, living in REALITY is not "cowering"--you're the one saying "bring it on--kill me, I don't care"

  • @ADEAL918 And when you say "bring it on I have nothing to hide", then the cops just start believing they can do what ever the hell they want and not have to worry about it because their colleagues will just cover for them and say "hey you don't care?, fine, we'll just do what we want and just change the laws by simply saying we've changed the laws to give us authority to use brutal tactics for non-hostile situations.

  • @ciccone39 My "bring it ons" say I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE!!!!! You're "bring it ons" say you don't value your life OR that of your loved ones (if you have any) or your fellow countrymen. I have no more time for pathetic figures like you

  • @ADEAL918 Your little "people who lived in police states would laugh me out of a room" is bullshit. First the level of our police state just hasn't risen to a level they've lived through, second I've met people who moved to US from such states and they admit the US is coming around to the same state they left.

  • @ciccone39 Actually they have lived in police states that were ABOUT A MILLION TIMES ABOVE ANYTHING WE HAVE EVER DONE HERE!!!!!! And any of these people you have met are either full of shit, senile, blind, or didn't actually live in real police states

  • @ciccone39 And as to "we haven't risen to that level" bullshit, the people I know SAW THEIR POLICE STATES FORM THROUGH EVERY STAGE, AND THEY KNOW FULL WELL THAT THIS IS IN NO DANGER OF HAPPENING HERE, BECAUSE WE ARE SAVING LIVES--IN THOSE STATES THEY WEREN'T EVEN UNDER ANY THREAT!!!! WE ARE!!!! GET WITH THE PROGRAM!~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 I told you, you're reverse psych mind tricks won't work on me boy! "Me saying i have nothing to hide means kill me"? Bullshit, I told you that won't work on me. Your "nothing to hide" means your week, just another clone. It means you cower. It means you believe in guilty until proven innocent when it's supposed to be the other way around. Eventually the police and feds will break down your door, tell you because you have nothing to hide we're going to fuck with you. You'll be sorry.

  • @ciccone39 I didn't say that moron. Apparently you can't read either. That explains a lot I guess. I said I am saying I have nothing to hide. YOU are the one saying kill me. Acknowledgement of REALITY makes NO ONE "weak" or "cowering"--I really don't know what parallel universe you are living in where it does. And this has nothing to do with "guilty or innocent"--I'm not talking about using any of the information we get in court to convict--only to STOP AN IMPENDING ACTION!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Your "I have nothing to hide" is just like a little statement made by Martin Niemöller in 1946:

    "THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,

    and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

    THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,

    and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

    THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,

    and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

    THEN THEY CAME for me

    and by that time no one was left to speak up."

    Thit is what all you weak yuppies are creating in the US.

  • @ciccone39 EXCEPT NO ONE IS "COMING FOR" ANYONE OTHER THAN TERRORISTS BUSTER!!!!!!!!!!! And since I'm no terrorist, those evil "fed" boogeymen you're fearmongering about are well aware that they're wasting their time breaking down my door and "fucking with" me because they have actual DANGEROUS fish to fry. And they know that buster. Time for you to know that too

  • @ADEAL918 Of course, just keep listening to your corrupt government and believe everything they tell you. Like I said before, read Fletcher Prouty's book The Secret Team. It's NOT a vanity book. It's the real deal. What can't you understand, the government has no right if it wants to listen(spy) an you without warrant. Lives will not be lost if not done. It's bullshit to keep you in fear and through propaganda to buy it as saving lives but it's not. I can't take this anymore I really can't.

  • @ciccone39 I listen to those with ACTUAL FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS ON THE GROUND!!!! Once again, I have no interest in vanity books. Fine, there are secret teams involved in stopping terror. Big whup. They're supposed to be "secret"--if they're not, they can't do their jobs. Whether you can "take it" or not, it's the FACTS, and grown ups learn to accept that. I'm not in "fear"--I'm in RECOGNITION OF REALITY!!!!! IT HAS SAVED LIVES, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!!!!! NOW SHOO!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 These teams are not to stop terror. They are create problems like terror so the US will always be in conflict for the military industrial complex. That IS what you call the war on terror. The war on terror is not because real terrorists attacked and we failed to stop them ,but because these teams actually make it possible for them to happen by first provoking them then opening doors for them.

  • @ciccone39 STOPPING TERRORIST GROUPS ONLY CREATES PROBLEMS BECAUSE TERRORISTS GET ANGRY WHEN THEY'RE STOPPED BUDDY!!!!!! Yeah, they "provoke" them by making it clear that the Jihadists' imperial desires to return Islam to its 13th century caliphite glory will NEVER succeed. Yeah, that pisses them off all right, but that doesn't prove SHIT!!!! They try to AVOID conflict when possible, but when people are SWORN TO DESTROY YOU, THAT CHANGES THINGS A BIT!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 Once again you prove how you just believe what you're told. There is NO word "jihadist". And Jihad in general is not good or bad. It simply means "the struggle". But where do you hear the word jihadist?, Mainstream media and politicians. Someone in Jihad is a "MUJAHID", not a jihadist! There are good guys carrying out Jihad as well as bad guys. All in their own way. The ones you speak of do not want to return Islam to some 13th century whatever. They want to be left alone.

  • @ciccone39 I KNOW WHAT THE WORD JIHAD ORIGINALLY MEANT, MORON!!!!! I'M AM REFERRING TO THE TERM THAT THOSE SWORN TO DESTROY THIS NATION USE TO REFER TO THEMSELVES!!!!!! THIS ISN'T SOME GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL TELLING ME THIS BUDDY. THIS IS THE MADMEN THEMSELVES IN THEIR OWN PROUD, SICK WORDS!!!! READ THEIR TREATISES BUDDY!!!! THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT!!!!! WE TRIED LEAVING THEM ALONE BEFORE 9/11--AND THAT'S WHAT WE GOT IN RETURN!!!!!!!!!

  • @ADEAL918 No you don't know Jihad. The bad guys don't call themselves jihadists. Hey yeah read their stuff. Do they say we hate the US for their freedom's? No! However Rudy Guiliani claims so. So does Bush. No, it's because the US occupies the middle east. Move out and you stop all this shit. It's all a game and you have no idea how it's played.

  • @ciccone39 I HAVE READ THEIR STUFF YOU PSYCHOPATH!!!! THEY CALL THEIR MISSION A JIHAD!!!!!! THEY TAKE ABOUT ISLAM TRIUMPHING OVER THE EVIL "SATANIC" WEST!!!!! And military presences at the request of that nation's government or to put in a non-terror supporting governent are not "occupations"--that implies an invasion with the intent to CONQUER--something we have nothing of the sort buddy. Again, learn some basic vocabulary before you argue more

  • @ADEAL918 I told you, yes they are Jihad, but there is no such word as "jihadist". All I'm pointing out is that you are a stupid fuck that uses words that don't exist that you hear politicians use and try and scare you. You know I remember a war called Vietnam where the government claimed if the US wasn't in that war, communism would spread everywhere. When the US finally left communism didn't spread, It just took over Vietnam.

  • @ciccone39 Yes, we miscalculated the threat in Vietnam. But big difference. Most of them weren't willing to be taken down with us--that's why it stopped there. They knew to stop there--the price of Vietnam was too high. A Jihadist --someone who practices Jihad as those sworn to destroy us use the term--has no such reservations. They don't care if they go down with us, because they've got their 72 virgins waiting for them in Paradise. That makes this MUCH different than the communism issue