Monkton is a complete imbecile, unscrupulous and cynical and in the pay of big business. Go to You Tube and look up Potholer54's videos. He completely debunks ever stupid word ever uttered by that moron.
Why doesn't this guy ever debate a real climate scientist? He is going after Gore who is a politician who make a movie. His selective data and misrepresentation of statistics would be torn to shreds in a debate with a real climate scientist.
Why hasn't Monckton ever published his research? If he has information that can change the scientific consensus, why is he wasting time preaching to laymen? Is he to lazy to publish his discoveries? Can he at least write one paper?
@blabby102 Excuse me. Al Gore IS the figure head and DID make the movie and IS a politician pushing this crap so why shouldn't he attack that? People still quote Gore left and right!
Media Transparency calculates that between 1991 and 2006 CFACT gained $1,280,000 from 18 grants from only two foundations -- the Carthage Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. The Carthage Foundation granted $1,105,000 to CFACT between 1991 - 2006, while the Sarah Scaife Foundation sent $175,000 to the group between 1996 - 2001.
Oh, dear. The first derivative line on his University of Illinois sea ice graph at 4:31 falls largely below the median since 2001, indicating negative aggregate ROC, which the upper graph also reflects. Does he think his audience knows nothing of elementary calculus? Whether he's right or wrong, if he's going to trot out graphs to support his assertion, they should maybe support his assertion.
exelent vid dude ,i want to see this man debate the climate change scientist live on tv lets see what theyve got to debunk him. come on all you msm channels get this man on your tv channel
or are you not brave enough im sure it would do your ratings some good
This has been flagged as spam show
Monkton is a complete imbecile, unscrupulous and cynical and in the pay of big business. Go to You Tube and look up Potholer54's videos. He completely debunks ever stupid word ever uttered by that moron.
andygray 3 weeks ago
Why doesn't this guy ever debate a real climate scientist? He is going after Gore who is a politician who make a movie. His selective data and misrepresentation of statistics would be torn to shreds in a debate with a real climate scientist.
Why hasn't Monckton ever published his research? If he has information that can change the scientific consensus, why is he wasting time preaching to laymen? Is he to lazy to publish his discoveries? Can he at least write one paper?
blabby102 1 year ago
@blabby102 Excuse me. Al Gore IS the figure head and DID make the movie and IS a politician pushing this crap so why shouldn't he attack that? People still quote Gore left and right!
almetcalf 1 week ago in playlist Lord Monckton Climategate December 4,2009
This has been flagged as spam show
Media Transparency calculates that between 1991 and 2006 CFACT gained $1,280,000 from 18 grants from only two foundations -- the Carthage Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. The Carthage Foundation granted $1,105,000 to CFACT between 1991 - 2006, while the Sarah Scaife Foundation sent $175,000 to the group between 1996 - 2001.
LOL
As for Monckton:
tinyurl com/yfxgr3s
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
acidgawd999 2 years ago
the truth and therefore leftwing
wscparks 2 years ago
"YOUR ENEMY: GEORGE SOROS"
watch?v=98fUyrzDyek
NookulerFreedom 2 years ago
thats NO "international" climate conference !
thats a red room and a bottle of water!
thats obviosly pretty cheap produced crabshit
whats wrong with you all
terbeon 2 years ago
So the guys with all the big oil money are staying in the cheapest places?
dud3man6969 2 years ago
He reminds me of Mr. Bean...lol
canadiangal0099 2 years ago
Climatology is easy money access
for some clever ones
racenemo 2 years ago
Oh, dear. The first derivative line on his University of Illinois sea ice graph at 4:31 falls largely below the median since 2001, indicating negative aggregate ROC, which the upper graph also reflects. Does he think his audience knows nothing of elementary calculus? Whether he's right or wrong, if he's going to trot out graphs to support his assertion, they should maybe support his assertion.
artgoat 2 years ago
@artgoat
marginally, and he's not hiding it nor saying anything to contradict the graph.
ShinyChuck 2 years ago
Oh. So climate change started in 2001? Never knew that. That's the blindingly obvious point.
ulysses1916i 2 years ago
he's got a way with words, he should rewrite obamas mundane speeches
Danebrogen 2 years ago
I would pay money to see Al Gore debate this man. Just to see the look on Al's stupid face.
maximusdecimus888 2 years ago
lol
I would give up my month salary to for a one hour debate Monckton vs Gore
i have no kids though... ;)
KlipKlep 2 years ago
algor won't. and even if he would, it would cost you 300k$ that's algor's fee ;)
sm0ckr 2 years ago
funny cant see any agw fans debuking mr monckton ? weird eh
motoxmainia 2 years ago
They mention his stuff is "rubbish" but aren't coming here and saying "see that chart there, it is wrong because _____".
ShinyChuck 2 years ago
I am amazed only 1,500 views since posted 2 days ago...please pass this on to friends and family get the word out !!!
beefree1 2 years ago
Absolutely amazing thanks.
Keor66 2 years ago
exelent vid dude ,i want to see this man debate the climate change scientist live on tv lets see what theyve got to debunk him. come on all you msm channels get this man on your tv channel
or are you not brave enough im sure it would do your ratings some good
motoxmainia 2 years ago
this man is brilliant, hopefully the word will spread around
Danebrogen 2 years ago
Fantastic videos thank you.
truefictions 2 years ago
No problem, be sure to send the link to everyone you email. :-)
ShinyChuck 2 years ago