Added: 2 years ago
From: bunsinh456
Views: 67,507
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (199)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lucky guy got the best gift "Luger"

  • The tiger was the spearhead of psy warfare. Trust me. If you fight a tank which non of your weapons can even penetrated you literally piss your pants. And the King Tiger was only a fail because the germans run out of proper quality steel.

  • @QooperG28 and time for sure..

  • Comment removed

  • WOW! Tiger 131! 0:50

  • The tiger was to expensive and time consuming to make...it did more harm then good for germany

  • If you ran across a Tiger... the Tiger would run across you... :D

  • One reason there wasn't a general surrender of Germany even though the war was lost, was to give troops more time to find western forces to surrender to.

    The Wehrmacht and particularly the SS were horrible, but the Red Army wasn't much better.

  • @Yora21 The Wehrmacht were not intrinsicly terrible people! it was the average german citizen forced to serve thier country, whether they supported the regime or not

  • @Yora21 the fucking recd army and commie stalin murdered 30 + million ppl and you never hear of that.people try to keep that quiet!.in WWII We should have been allies with germany and kicked russias ass!

  • Lmao that Captain dude, has 100+ persuasion points D:

  • amazing story. 3 men able to make over a thousand soldiers to surrender.

  • @ngu0061 it wasnt the men that made them surrender

  • You can't be fucking serious. The kid SOLD the weapons?!

    I would have had him executed the german way.

  • i'd disown that kid... lol

  • lucky coat?

  • The German's nicknamed The Sherman The Ronson after the cigarette lighter, and also The Tommy Cooker, because it would light up and explode with one shot from a Panzer Tank. Tommy Cooker referred to the British whom also used the Sherman in large numbers. American soldiers nicknamed the Sherman The Purple Heart Boxes (ie, Coffins) because they knew that they were not going to live long fighting in those inferior tanks..

  • I am not sure that Wittman was so great, I mean he was hit numerous times but the Tiger saved him. In an even battle I am not sure he would have survived so long. I know for fact that his tiger was hit twice very early on that Bocage battle, only the Tigers thick armour allowed him to fight without any real fear of being taken out. The Allied tankers needed far far more skill to take out a Tiger with a Sherman, even a Firefly with the British 17 pdr gun, as it had much weaker armour,

  • @Xiolablu3 i agree but in the early parts of operation barbarossa he proved himself in his small panzer. he was a very good tank commander but yes he was saved alot by his tiger.

  • @Xiolablu3 yeah but because of the huge size, slow moveability and speed of the tiger it was easier to hit it. so a lighter, smaller and faster tank had a weaker armour but it was more difficult to hit it...

  • @tobi25586 But even then it couldnt penetrate the Tigers armour. Wittman could basically roam with immunity unless he came up against a British Sherman Firefly (1 in 4 Shermans we fireflies), and even then the Tiger had a big advantage in armour. I am just saying that you dont need much skill when your tank can withstand hits from your opponents, yet your tank destroys them in one hit. To me Wittmans story demonstrates how superior the Tiger was vs the Allies tanks, not how good Wittman was.

  • @Xiolablu3 yeah I know and my point was that its a matter of fact that you get hit more often in a slow, huge tank, but this doesnt mean you are a bad tank commander its just easier to hit it (and I dont mean penetrate the armour) and as waffenss893 said he proved himself in smaller tanks. he became the commander of a tiger in early 1943 but till this time he already got the iron cross 1. and 2. class by fighting the russians (including t-34 tanks) so he was a good tank commander

  • Is it me, or is this guy severely wrong. His story seems like utter BS.

  • main tank of the US ARMY NOT THE ALLIES god im american and i cant stand the fact that russia is just ignored

  • stupid documentary for stupid americans

  • very incomplete documentary. american usual bullshit

  • nuke at 3:22

  • @PloKoonep3 - Are you nuts or just stupid? It may have made a small "Mushroom Cloud" plume upon explosion but that was soooo not a nuke. The SS were insane but not so insane as to carry nuclear weapons BY HAND... and thank goodness there was no such thing as a Nuke back then.

  • @MinionOfDeth2112 joke man joke

  • @PloKoonep3 - Oh... sorry, LOL.

  • 3 men in a jeep took over......you should settle down on that boomshine pops.

  • Interesting, but the STG 44 was actually prioritized for volksgrenadiers (2 weeks training, but later trained in the field by veterans). Oh, and besides: They were not "evil"!

  • lol. I don't think they would have hundreds of panzers, half-tracks and trucks. if they did they probably didn't even have the petrol to run them. lol sounds like bs to me. and of course he lost it. :P sounds fishy to me.

  • Look at them evil white folks !

  • @PupuTheClown Horrid grammar.

  • 3 men make a whole division surrender wow and i thought only chuck norris could do that

  • @rapcorerocks nah, chuck norris couldve made the ENTIRE german army surrender by only showing them his boot

  • I would have leveled that 88mm on the tiger and blasted him to kingdom come.

  • the kid didn't lose it. trust me. he didn't lose it.

  • @jondeare that kid sold it for cash i bet. what a little hustler

  • @jondeare probably traded it for something or sold it for cheap money, i once bought an SS pin from some stupid kid for 20 bucks, the damn ding was worth a good 2 grand easyly

  • @jondeare He sold it for a 8 ball :)

  • @jondeare He sold it for a 8 ball :)

    

  • @jondeare he smoked it

  • 'if you ran across a tiger... well... gee... that would just ruin your day" ahahahahahaha

  • Wow impressive i think its a little exagerated but who knows?

  • What surpises me...this stuff ...went on in about 5-7 years.

    It's not like today where you wait 10 years and still no answer to the IED is found.

  • @Durendal33 And it's not just that no one has found an answer to the guy planting an IED it's a guy wearing it and blowing himself up.The guy planting exposives in his baby sisters dol.

  • so innacurate

  • Why is it always Wittmann, and not Bölter, Carius, Knispel or Schroif or countless others. I understand that in this documentary they concentrate on the Waffen-SS ace, but this repeats on other documentaries as well.

  • that was epic that two men was so lucky that they made a whole army to surrender to them by getting into enemy line by accident.

  • The only way burris's first storry is true is if he had some reinforcements which is highly unlikely, but the second story is believeable

  • no way 15000 troups surrendered... maybe 150 or 1500, but no way 15000 

  • I Feel That There Is Some Properganda In This Part...

  • A spetsnaz would demolish one of these waffles with a toe nail clipping.

  • @JTsmokingbaby

    Yeah and I personally with a machine gun could have easily defeated the 300 Spartans at Thermopylae. This is why we dont compare units from different eras.

    And secondly, the Spetznaz are special forces, and the SS were elite forces, and there is quite a difference between these two.

  • excellent documentary

  • Tiger= Battles winner..

    But not a war winner due to its limited numbers...

  • This sounds like one of those stories where the more times he told it, the German army who surrendered to him got bigger and bigger hahaha. In actual fact, there were 500 Americans and 3 Germans, but years later there were fewer Americans, and more and more Germans...

  • yes i agree s020015 the waffen ss raped t34's but they cannot handle more and were overwhelmed...........go live in an alternate world where the nazi's won world ww2....on this world it's not happening

  • Really? "The Waffen S.S was the 20th century's most formidable and EVIL elite forces"

    WTF... since when did a soldier's political standpoint get in the way of his ability to kill people?

    I know this series on weaponology is trying to excel in entertainment value but is it all that necessary to mention how evil the Nazis are every 10 seconds? It's as annoying as watching an obnoxious guy in the closet try to prove how he's not gay.

  • @DualSMGsFTW Youre right, but not only the mentioning of 'evil' bothers me, but also describing the Waffen SS as elite forces. The Wehrmacht's true elite forces were called 'Brandenburg' and were operating behind enemy lines.

  • @DualSMGsFTW the NASDAP were not evil, they were the future and the light!

  • Weaponology should make a special episode fully on star wars' stormtroopers!

  • @tortelli Weaponology is to explain the development of weapons. Can you provide development of Star Wars Stormtroopers?

  • If i could pick anyway to die id wanna be vaporized by an 88mm tank cannon lol

  • The t34 rapes the Tiger

  • @iTzzEuphoriaaaaaa HELL YEAH!!!!!!

  • @iTzzEuphoriaaaaaa The T-34s were raped by German infantries.

  • @s020015 wrong

  • @iTzzEuphoriaaaaaa Don't say you are wrong. I know you are wrong. Thank you for agreeing my point:

    Waffen SS raped T-34s.

  • @s020015You know because you were in ww2 ? right .. shut the fuck up ......

  • @iTzzEuphoriaaaaaa Of course I am not in WW2. But you are not there too. Therefore, shut your mouth up and read more historical non-fiction books. After a full analysis, you can try to jump off from a building seems to be 50 floors tall.

  • @s020015 hahah youre fucking hopeless !

  • @s020015 "Waffen SS raped T-34s."

    Sure one tiger tank would obligate a T34 -- but in reality it was more like 10x T34 tanks firing at a tiger tank.

  • I get so annoyed when people pronounce Waffen as "waffen" and not "vaffen".

  • I get so annoyed when people pronouce Waffen as "waffen" and not "vaffen".

  • 3 dudes in a jeep Vs An army of Rambo's. Not really a thing that will happen everyday or any day at all.

  • The Tiger Tank Fricken owns,

  • it's not a super tank is an advanced heavy tank

  • How the hell do you lose a pistol? let alone one that had soo much sentimental value...

  • Why they always go crazy about Wittman (which is deserved surely), and always forget Carius, Bölter, Knispel and other Tiger Aces who really deserve their honor. Knispel took out 168 tanks, Carius 150+, Bölter 139 and Wittman 138. Villers Bocage is always on the spotlight, and nobody remembers Staudeggers single tiger dueling 50 T-34's, and come out victorious with 22 of the T-34 going up in flames...

  • @aaKonda teach me more

  • FLYING TIGER :D

  • im just 18 but i wouldve beat the CRAP out of the kid that lost it...

  • 01:50

    WTF is this egg head talkin' about.

    The WaffenSS soldiers were as proud of their corps as every US Marine is.

  • lol waffen ss was 25 years more advance then anyone

  • one of my kid lost it lmao!!!

  • This thing is.. It's huge, it's very heavily armored, it has a GREAT gun! If you ran accross a Tiger, well, geee, you - you were - that - that would ruin your day!

  • look at the badass smoking at 9:21

  • Oh my god 3 men secured the surrender of an entire Pazer Corps?

    Shit they must have come out of there screming their nut off and laughing away.You would NEVER FORGET THAT!

  • if his kids lost his luger pistol - why were his kids playing with it?

  • If you ran across a tiger-well gee that would ruin your day

  • Michael Wittmann was not respected by his adversaries. Noone even knew who he was until after he was killed, it wasn't until after his death Americans started bickering as to whom claimed his life.

  • the music at 301 is epic 

  • i respect the S.S they fought well just cuz i do not like there leader dose not mean i can not respect the enemy

  • @darkrain64 like they said in the vid - "you didn't admire them, but you certainly had to respect them"

  • soviets had a much cheaper weapon that could destroy the Tiger, that weapon was a dog strapped with explosives.

  • @MPLNtodopormexico that "weapon" was a failure :)

    The dogs often ran under soviet tanks by mistake, since that's what they were trained with.

  • @EonFigure Thank you. See I love History so would you care to point in the derection where you read that, Fact?

  • who wouldint be scared , its a fucking tank , tiger or an abrams its still a tank

  • i cant belive they thought it can fly

  • finnman kicked ass!

  • you spelled Wittmann completely wrong lmfao

  • about kid loosing that luger...it is a lie ....

  • u are right!

    never was that incident documented in WW2 history

    im a fanatic of German WW2 weaponry & history, and NEVER was this documented that it happened at all

    15,000 troops surrend to 3 men in a jeep? the nazi's had nothing to lose, they wouldnt give up that easy!

    and besides that... by the time the russians & allies got to Berlin... 150,000 Nazi troops had already left Germany and are believed to "disappear into countries far away" such as the belief that Hitler left to South America

  • @nle4lyfe they didn't surrender the guys tricked them and ran away before the Germans said.. . wait a minute

    we all know they got there revange one way or another

  • @nle4lyfe They had nothing to lose? They had nothing to win either...

  • @nle4lyfe : The old guy may have exagerated the numbers, but the fact is the Germans had a great deal to lose if the Russians caught them.

    The notion of 150,000 Germans fleeing into foreign countries at the end of the war- how did they do it? Out through the entirely Allied controlled ports and shipping lanes? Using the burnt-out, shot-down remains of their transport aircraft? Getting the Swiss Navy to move them? Seriously, that's a bigger laugh than the notion of surrendering to 3 guys.

  • @althesmith I remember watching a show on the history channel mentioning a Nazi plane that could travel extremely far on one tank of gas. They said it could make it from Europe to South America which is where they believe most of them went.

  • @taberr5 : One planeload of guys does not equal 150,000 dudes. IIRC, the largest German transport could not handle 150 of them. And that bird was a sitting duck for every Allied plane in the area.

    By the end of the war, the transport element of the Luftwaffe was a shambles. Fuel reserves were basically non-existent.

  • @althesmith Not to mention that there were German colonies popping up in South America after world war 2. Then there was a number of German soldiers that just appeared in the French Foreign Legion. To this day the French Foreign Legion claims that they have had 210,000 people enlist from Germany all together being the highest country contributing to their organization. Next in line was Italy, with 60,000. Doesn't that seem odd to you at all?

  • @taberr5 : I might believe 200,000 over the entire history of the Legion. After WW2? Not so much. The Legion at it's peak I believe only had about 30,000 men- not nearly enough to absorb the numbers you claim.

  • @althesmith Hence why I said they had 210,00 people enlist from Germany all together. I wasn't trying to be misleading and I apologize if it came out wrong. I'm just saying it's easier to hide 150,000 people than you think. Considering the soviets lost something around 26 million people in that war. 150,000 people would have been easy to hide, I wouldn't of been surprised if they said 300,000 escaped.

  • @nle4lyfe

    Yeah, and which German Panzer Corps would have had "Hundreds of tanks" in April 1945. This guy should lay off the scotch.

  • @nle4lyfe and wouldn't have the german commander radio'd the German high command confirming the surrender?

  • @nle4lyfe

    If the russians got a hold of them they face a slow and painful death.

  • @nle4lyfe no, that's why they where flocking toward the Western Allies to Surrender.........

  • @Dogmeat1950 yea u know y cus if they surrendred to the sub humans they all would have been shot on the sbot.

  • @nle4lyfe so because it wasn't documented it didn't happen? That makes no sense

  • Tiger was too expensive.

  • @whitesox889

    The Tiger Class tanks was also gas guzzlers compared to the other Panzers

  • shot your son

  • olejohnson Tiger 1 ist PzKpfw V also 5

  • Can ANYONE find Moffat's Story online? I have been looking and cant find anything about this story.. I would love to forward it to people..

  • I want to kill that vet's kid A FUCKING LUGER FROM A GENERAL IDIOT KID

  • Tell me about it.

  • howitzer!!!

  • @EmbryonicOrgy ohoh sorry panzer 4 isnt a tiger but u sure that is an panzer4

  • There was. It was smaller than the Panther which was smaller than the Tiger tank. Essentially, the Panzer was designed to defeat the Russian main battle tanks.

  • @EmbryonicOrgy  panzer 4 is an tiger, there was many kinds of tigers like königstiger that was the panzer6 , alles klar herr komissar

  • @olejohnson

    No, the panzer IV was simply the panzer IV

    panzer VI (6) is the tiger

    Panzer V is the Panther

  • i want a tiger tank lol

  • it is ! :D

  • 07:18 does that tiger have aprons? dont know if thats the word in english, but i mean a cover for the wheels at the side.

  • Thats not a Tiger. Thats a Panzer IV.

  • damn, you re right. got to check my eyes...

  • that was Panzer IV and the tiger or Panzer V didn't have it

  • yeah,i know. but thx xD

  • 1 of his kids lost? or pawned it? hehehe

  • 88 GUNS ALSO USED BY THE CHINESE!

  • T34s usually simply went full speed straight at the german tanks and rammed the germans, and the russian tank commander would simply go back for a new tank.

    The T34 had the advantage in having sloped armour and high speeds which gave it an advantage in a open feild battle in which they could manouver easily.

  • exactly. and hey, they didnt even had to go back, because of its form the t34 was very very robust.

  • I read that the Panther was the best tank of World War Two.

  • suppose so, but the tiger was awesome though

  • germany

  • k, Tiger vs Jagdpanther

    Who will win?

  • Depends on the situation, as always. The real important thing is that generally speaking, just about all German weapon systems after 1943 were able to kill just about anything they hit and not all enemy weapon systems could guarantee a kill when they hit.

  • at what range??? because if its about 1500m i think Jagdpanther because the Jagdpanther had a Kwk 43 88mm L/71 the same of the King Tiger, while the Tiger had the Kwk 36 88mm L/56. L/71 is the caliber and the length of the barrel of the cannon. longer barrel results in a higher muzzle velocity. and jagdpanther had sloped armor.

  • length of the barrel? I dont think so, the l/56 and L/71 stands for the length of the round, meaning more powder and more kinetic energy.

  • @RedPower012

    wrong. it is the length of the barrel measured in caliber diametre. l56 means the length of the barrel is 56 times the caliber

  • Guderian wanted a German version of t-34, panther was the result.

  • Kinda disappointed this isn't really about the waffen SS but about german weapons.

  • is the Veteran still alive?cause i have a lots of question

  • the tiger is not an offensive tank its bloody slow, not like the T-34, the Russian armor saved the world. T-34 well armored, 84 gun and travels faster than a truck. They over bited panther and tiger and then just drove over the japanese

  • @Lukeclout

    the Tiger had an 88mm as it's main gun, that's more than the T-34's 85mm, it packed a bigger punch than the panther's 75mm tho.

    It wasn't as fast as you say.

  • Lukeclout,the Tiger have a better armor that is 120mm while the T34 have 52mm and the T34 could penetrate the tiger armor at the side...but it needs to be very uncomfortable close...

  • wrong t-34 could penetrate from front.

  • depend on witch t-34 we are talkin a bout if the normal t34 like i say from the side but if it is T34 type 3 85mm gun can penetrate the front....if he shot twice or more

  • yes t34/76 could not but when /76 was being used they were mostly going up against pziii and pziv which were inferior. Few tigers around.

    When the panther was coming out the t-34/85 was out too and was definitely a match. And yes it could penetrate from the front. Look up the facts, otherwise you're just being an ignorant nazi fanboy.

    Even Guderian, the mastermind of the blitkrieg, called the t-34 the "best tank in the world". Sorry but your nazi fantasies just aren't reality.

  • @IcyScythe indeed and im not nazi boy..cause if i love any axis that mean i love Jap that kill a hell lots of malaysian...anyway nazi have a lots of war crime like the Israel

  • that wasn't directed at you nazrul, my bad if I offended you.

    But I'm sure you've noticed that there are many neo-nazis on youtube commenting these types of videos with things like "14/88" and HH and other bullshit.

  • I dont mind that much anyway.....

  • So the key is to not assume neo-nazism when you see any positive comment about weapon quality and look for things like racist comments and comments which directly admire Nazi ideology. Admiring German technology doesn't have to mean admiring Nazi ideology.

  • T-34 was the best balanced tank but in pure combat terms, the Panther generally had the better of the T34 because not only did the Panther have the more accurate gun, better optics, and training behind it, but its armour was mostly reliable. A lot of t34/85 tanks were killed because the non-penetrating rounds of German guns broke the bad welds and brittle plates while Soviet rounds which failed to penetrate only made loud bang sounds. Quality control counts for a lot in tanks

  • btw..the panther can own a T34 miles away

  • pretty fast too