Intelligent Design Experiments

[DunateoRom8v37]

As a Christian which support the creationism. I also feel that this is a weak video.

God's glory can be demonstrated far better.

to whom that posted this, i am just giving my honest feedback.

Keep on sharing the truth

[cpurmal]

I don't see anybody approving grants for these "experiments." Nor do I see any methods that they are going to use. ID belongs in a philosophy class, let science remain pure.

[synsei1]

Sorry, but nothing at all in this vid points to the necessity of a Designer, except of course when the designer is a human scientist. I can draw a circle or a hexagon on purpose, that's design; that doesn't mean that a hexagonal or circular natural structure has to be designed too.

[baronblod2003]

The human body is badly constructed. So many errors, so many bottlenecks. To even try to say it's perfect and well made is stupid. We're still changing and have been for billions of years. If god exists he didn't do a good job.

[circusOFprecision]

@baronblod2003

the human body is a formation that is becoming, because it is the embodiment of being

it has to cope with numerous factors in within a synergistic framework in order to maintain a survivable form

if you are against the idea that it was intelligently constructed, than you have no grounds to say that it is badly constructed, it makes no sense to critique something on an engineering level if you don't even believe it was engineered...

[circusOFprecision]

@baronblod2003

can it be improved? of course...

but it got here without our ideas just fine by itself

[TheFifthApes]

"We can't explain these systems by natural law"

Maybe you can't, but Kennith Miller and every other biologist on the planet can.

Sounds like you need to read a biology book Mr. Narrator.

[Bueller007]

So let me get this straight.  Any time humans design anything now, we have to call it an application of ID?

[mookiewak]

Even if it's Billy Bob McDumbass an his new fangled "road kill pokin' stick" we have to call that INTELLIGENT too.

Obviously we have to lower the standards or God would be out on his cosmic ass for designing things like the eye the way it is.

[mookiewak]

This video is another utterly weak claim about the applications of Intelligent Design. I saw no experiments here.

Where are the experiments to actually test for intelligent design?

[jouc12]

@mookiewak Can you give any applications of evolution?

[aarlin81]

Duh we can't explain it so let's make an argument from ignorance and say it must have been designed. Don't forget the false dichotomy too.

Go where the data leads us? Nah ignorance again.

Now let's make up an analogy that breaks down easily. We'll try to show that complexity requires a designer. Just leave out that we know these no biological system were designed, have evidence and can prove it rather than inferring it based on ignorance.

Same repackaged arguments with some crappy CGI.