Hey Jim!! BTW the collapses of the WTC in NO WAY resemble a Controlled Demolition. If explosives were involved these collapses would look completely different. And sorry!! but its not possible to have news cameras 800 feet from these buildings (as ABC NEWS are) claim this building is stuffed full of explosives and have that camera crew record absolutely nothing. Which they do.
This is nothing short of absurd. I speak from personal experience.
Dont assume anything about 9-11 truth. (like that there were no hijackings or the phone calls were faked using voice-morphing.or whatever..The evidence shows they were real. But the evidence also clearly shows that wtc 1 2 & 7 were blown up with pre-planted explosives,,beyond any reasonable doubt.
Hoffman makes a crucial point about human psychology.
Many viewers of the TV images, including architects such as Richard Gage and myself, were so flabbergasted by the incredible events that we didn't notice the glaring inconsistencies until much later on.
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura made the same astute observation.
'The planes got taken over by a few guys with primitive weapons..' How unbelievable. While Jim Hoffman is talking a few guys with primative weapons come up behind him and slash his throat. Mr. Hoffman laughs and tells them to go away and continues to talk about 911. Has he heard the recording from ATC of the pilots screaming and struggling as the hijacking happens? I forgot of course that must have been faked because it is the 'official story' and therefore didn't happen. >>>>
@cwlldoran >>> That 'official story' is very useful. It tells you everything that didn't happen so you know then that something else must have happened. It's childishly simple really.
I wish a major news network would interview or debate Jim Hoffman. You know they usually refrain from interviewing the true experts that don't support the official story.
You would think he would stand a chance at getting chosen since at first glance he appears somewhat eccentric and the mainstream usually tries to find 9/11 truth movement guys they can easily portray as quacks. Unfortunately I think they realize that they don't stand a chance in a debate with him.
If you feel that way, I am sure Mr. Hoffman would be willing to debate you...but, I am willing to bet that you will have some excuse, or that he is "too crazy" for you to waste your time on...this subject is perfect for people like you, if you disagree, take him on claim by claim, and don't attempt to say that is a waste of time. Do some research on the number of people who have questioned 9/11. Former military personal, scientists, engineers, pilots, family members, and survivors....
CHECK>>>>' Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo'
CHECK>>>>'the president who told the truth.
...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller
@Ra3D Jim Hoffman is on the spot. This clip, focusing a lot on the psychological apects of these events, is one of the most convicing speaches on 9/11 I've ever encountered.
It's simple intuition that, had these enormous steel structures collapsed, portions of them would have fallen down; they would not have thoroughly pulverized and shredded themselves from top-to-bottom in gigantic explosions "vaporizing" their human occupants so thoroughly that not even a trace could be found to identify more than one thousand victims. from 911 research website
hey jizzmonger, your a typical blind american. what else do you need!! maybe you should look at this video again. you talk about facts, there are plenty of facts to support this theory. You must be no older than 18 maybe 20... your government lied to you wake the fuk up....
Ok. Try this: Very few explosives were needed to initiate the collapses, the floors collapsed progressively under the weight of the falling caps, (as the official story claims,) perimeter sections peeled off naturally, but more charges were needed to complete the demolition of the cores.
American political systems are built on false choices. 911 truth gives us many false choices as well. Those who still doubt 911 was an inside job aren't the only ones who need to wake up.
What exactly have you done to test your observations? The buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes. Have you read the NIST report? Have you read Hoffman, Jeff King, Steven E Jones and others' responses to the reports? Or did you watch Fox Entertainment?
No plane hit 7. Almost ten years later and you still deny the obvious. No plane crashed in Shanksville and a 767 did not hit the Pentagon. Goggle the facts, break through denial.
I'm a little confused on your opinions about Hoffman
Is he credible or not?
Are his facts accurate or not?
On his website he provides his detailed research that a plane did in fact hit the Pentagon, and that a plane did in fact crash in Shanksville (though he believes it was possibly shot down)
So tell me, are his researching skills reliable or not?
He can't be credible about the towers collapsing "being demolished" but not the other two flights
I tried bending over to support the official story but I don't believe in the tooth fairy anymore I wish I could go back it was comforting thinking I would get money if a tooth fell out and it is uncomfortable to know our government lied WTC was a controlled demolitian
Hey Jim!! BTW the collapses of the WTC in NO WAY resemble a Controlled Demolition. If explosives were involved these collapses would look completely different. And sorry!! but its not possible to have news cameras 800 feet from these buildings (as ABC NEWS are) claim this building is stuffed full of explosives and have that camera crew record absolutely nothing. Which they do.
This is nothing short of absurd. I speak from personal experience.
Explosives do not go off in a sound vacuum.
roquefortfiles 4 weeks ago
Jim Hoffman is a hero.
Dont assume anything about 9-11 truth. (like that there were no hijackings or the phone calls were faked using voice-morphing.or whatever..The evidence shows they were real. But the evidence also clearly shows that wtc 1 2 & 7 were blown up with pre-planted explosives,,beyond any reasonable doubt.
winston2015 4 months ago
Hoffman makes a crucial point about human psychology.
Many viewers of the TV images, including architects such as Richard Gage and myself, were so flabbergasted by the incredible events that we didn't notice the glaring inconsistencies until much later on.
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura made the same astute observation.
thechinadesk 8 months ago
@thechinadesk Word.
Funkadelic2 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor & print it without her approval?
If the WTC was destroyed by CD & not fire, how do you explain the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?
If the WTC was destroyed via CD, how did the charges survive the plane impacts & how did the perpetrators know where the planes would hit?
ctcole77 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We (NIST) Have the Results and Only We Have the Results
watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk
Sunder'sÔªø Silverish Molten Metal
watch?v=pJ8OCtzGgk4
Sunder on What Controlled Demolition LooksÔªø Like
watch?v=4ZrcDTjkIhI
More logic videos to come. (Future ones will better put logic into context to show how fascinating this "debate" is.) Please subscribe.
Anyone wishing to respond to these, please look up "intellectual honesty" and "logical fallacies" beforehand. Thanks.
iBlindGame 10 months ago
'The planes got taken over by a few guys with primitive weapons..' How unbelievable. While Jim Hoffman is talking a few guys with primative weapons come up behind him and slash his throat. Mr. Hoffman laughs and tells them to go away and continues to talk about 911. Has he heard the recording from ATC of the pilots screaming and struggling as the hijacking happens? I forgot of course that must have been faked because it is the 'official story' and therefore didn't happen. >>>>
cwlldoran 10 months ago
@cwlldoran >>> That 'official story' is very useful. It tells you everything that didn't happen so you know then that something else must have happened. It's childishly simple really.
cwlldoran 10 months ago
Brilliant psychological analysis!
amoergosum3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
cloudburstlenepmhq 1 year ago
I wish a major news network would interview or debate Jim Hoffman. You know they usually refrain from interviewing the true experts that don't support the official story.
You would think he would stand a chance at getting chosen since at first glance he appears somewhat eccentric and the mainstream usually tries to find 9/11 truth movement guys they can easily portray as quacks. Unfortunately I think they realize that they don't stand a chance in a debate with him.
CourierForLiberty 1 year ago
I'm ashamed that I didn't question the collapse at the time. Why didn't I question the story? Are we really trained to accept these 'ugly truths'?
5147848amp 1 year ago
flanksteak2 = paid to lie
TrutherD1 2 years ago
Watching this guy trying to paint the chaos that day as a carefully coordinated plot where everything was micromanaged is almost painful.
And really tragedy? He's really truly deep down believes that he is right.
flanksteak2 2 years ago
If you feel that way, I am sure Mr. Hoffman would be willing to debate you...but, I am willing to bet that you will have some excuse, or that he is "too crazy" for you to waste your time on...this subject is perfect for people like you, if you disagree, take him on claim by claim, and don't attempt to say that is a waste of time. Do some research on the number of people who have questioned 9/11. Former military personal, scientists, engineers, pilots, family members, and survivors....
mahones64 2 years ago
@mahones64
I'll debate him but he jumps around from topic to topic like a meth head on a final bender.
It would be a waste of my time but I would certainly do it on some type of internet forum.
I would win but it still wouldn't make TRUTHERS more intelligent. They would just say I was a paid shill rather than addressing the evidence.
flanksteak2 2 years ago
Hoffman is talking about his beliefs, he presents no technical evidence.
flanksteak2 2 years ago
A true American Hero!
zoskiaist 2 years ago
Yes this site was a crime scene, whatever your feelings about who did it, and it was not investigated properly. CSI NY?
This did not show those who died the respect and dignity one would hope we would all be afforded.
mooners40 2 years ago
CHECK>>>>' Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo'
CHECK>>>>'the president who told the truth.
...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller
sharons813 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hoffman is such a nutter.
The poor freak can't even sit still.
He jerks all around and blurts phrases like a methhead under interrogation at the Police Station.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
what he is talking about is not easy...
detriplea 2 years ago
Easier than your Mom
jizzmonger 2 years ago
this happened in 2001, and im only really questioning it now,
more people should open their eyes. Zeitgeist?
Ra3D 3 years ago 4
whats zeitgeist
Zuel227 2 years ago
@Ra3D Jim Hoffman is on the spot. This clip, focusing a lot on the psychological apects of these events, is one of the most convicing speaches on 9/11 I've ever encountered.
Funkadelic2 10 months ago
It's simple intuition that, had these enormous steel structures collapsed, portions of them would have fallen down; they would not have thoroughly pulverized and shredded themselves from top-to-bottom in gigantic explosions "vaporizing" their human occupants so thoroughly that not even a trace could be found to identify more than one thousand victims. from 911 research website
zoskiaist 3 years ago 3
well said...
hiscretirement 3 years ago
hey jizzmonger, your a typical blind american. what else do you need!! maybe you should look at this video again. you talk about facts, there are plenty of facts to support this theory. You must be no older than 18 maybe 20... your government lied to you wake the fuk up....
PAGEN3 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sure they might have lied about 911 in more ways than 1 but the buildings were NOT blown up with explosives.
Planes hit them, fires burned and they fell.
Pretty basic and pretty predictable.
911ShillBait911 3 years ago
Ok. Try this: Very few explosives were needed to initiate the collapses, the floors collapsed progressively under the weight of the falling caps, (as the official story claims,) perimeter sections peeled off naturally, but more charges were needed to complete the demolition of the cores.
American political systems are built on false choices. 911 truth gives us many false choices as well. Those who still doubt 911 was an inside job aren't the only ones who need to wake up.
music7564 3 years ago
What exactly have you done to test your observations? The buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes. Have you read the NIST report? Have you read Hoffman, Jeff King, Steven E Jones and others' responses to the reports? Or did you watch Fox Entertainment?
sxmadrid 3 years ago 2
Above is response to 911shillbait911
sxmadrid 3 years ago
No plane hit 7. Almost ten years later and you still deny the obvious. No plane crashed in Shanksville and a 767 did not hit the Pentagon. Goggle the facts, break through denial.
murrayfurryy 2 years ago
I'm a little confused on your opinions about Hoffman
Is he credible or not?
Are his facts accurate or not?
On his website he provides his detailed research that a plane did in fact hit the Pentagon, and that a plane did in fact crash in Shanksville (though he believes it was possibly shot down)
So tell me, are his researching skills reliable or not?
He can't be credible about the towers collapsing "being demolished" but not the other two flights
You can't have it both ways
jeffmay1 2 years ago
Psychological operations are a sensitive subject for the uninformed.
Zhagarim 3 years ago
well spoken
nookiboi 3 years ago
Typical truther.
No facts, just a lot of blather.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
Typical troll.
Feces flowing whilst communicating.
Zhagarim 3 years ago
No, you must have heard the Truthers.....they are always yelling over everyone else while they are talking.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
True, sorry for the harsh reply.
Zhagarim 3 years ago
I tried bending over to support the official story but I don't believe in the tooth fairy anymore I wish I could go back it was comforting thinking I would get money if a tooth fell out and it is uncomfortable to know our government lied WTC was a controlled demolitian
busterfairway 3 years ago 2
In other words, you wish you could be like 911ShillBait911? Noooooooooooooooooooooo!
MrHolipsism 3 years ago