Added: 3 years ago
From: murrayfurryy
Views: 2,045
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey Jim!! BTW the collapses of the WTC in NO WAY resemble a Controlled Demolition. If explosives were involved these collapses would look completely different. And sorry!! but its not possible to have news cameras 800 feet from these buildings (as ABC NEWS are) claim this building is stuffed full of explosives and have that camera crew record absolutely nothing. Which they do.

    This is nothing short of absurd. I speak from personal experience.

    Explosives do not go off in a sound vacuum.

  • Jim Hoffman is a hero.

    Dont assume anything about 9-11 truth. (like that there were no hijackings or the phone calls were faked using voice-morphing.or whatever..The evidence shows they were real. But the evidence also clearly shows that wtc 1 2 & 7 were blown up with pre-planted explosives,,beyond any reasonable doubt.

  • Hoffman makes a crucial point about human psychology.

    Many viewers of the TV images, including architects such as Richard Gage and myself, were so flabbergasted by the incredible events that we didn't notice the glaring inconsistencies until much later on.

    Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura made the same astute observation.

  • @thechinadesk Word.

  • 'The planes got taken over by a few guys with primitive weapons..' How unbelievable. While Jim Hoffman is talking a few guys with primative weapons come up behind him and slash his throat. Mr. Hoffman laughs and tells them to go away and continues to talk about 911. Has he heard the recording from ATC of the pilots screaming and struggling as the hijacking happens? I forgot of course that must have been faked because it is the 'official story' and therefore didn't happen. >>>>

  • @cwlldoran >>> That 'official story' is very useful. It tells you everything that didn't happen so you know then that something else must have happened. It's childishly simple really.

  • Brilliant psychological analysis!

  • I wish a major news network would interview or debate Jim Hoffman. You know they usually refrain from interviewing the true experts that don't support the official story.

    You would think he would stand a chance at getting chosen since at first glance he appears somewhat eccentric and the mainstream usually tries to find 9/11 truth movement guys they can easily portray as quacks. Unfortunately I think they realize that they don't stand a chance in a debate with him.

  • I'm ashamed that I didn't question the collapse at the time. Why didn't I question the story? Are we really trained to accept these 'ugly truths'?

  • flanksteak2 = paid to lie

  • Watching this guy trying to paint the chaos that day as a carefully coordinated plot where everything was micromanaged is almost painful.

    And really tragedy? He's really truly deep down believes that he is right.

  • If you feel that way, I am sure Mr. Hoffman would be willing to debate you...but, I am willing to bet that you will have some excuse, or that he is "too crazy" for you to waste your time on...this subject is perfect for people like you, if you disagree, take him on claim by claim, and don't attempt to say that is a waste of time. Do some research on the number of people who have questioned 9/11. Former military personal, scientists, engineers, pilots, family members, and survivors....

  • @mahones64

    I'll debate him but he jumps around from topic to topic like a meth head on a final bender.

    It would be a waste of my time but I would certainly do it on some type of internet forum.

    I would win but it still wouldn't make TRUTHERS more intelligent. They would just say I was a paid shill rather than addressing the evidence.

  • Hoffman is talking about his beliefs, he presents no technical evidence.

  • A true American Hero!

  • Yes this site was a crime scene, whatever your feelings about who did it, and it was not investigated properly. CSI NY?

    This did not show those who died the respect and dignity one would hope we would all be afforded.

  • CHECK>>>>' Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo'

    CHECK>>>>'the president who told the truth.

    ...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller

  • what he is talking about is not easy...

  • Easier than your Mom

  • this happened in 2001, and im only really questioning it now,

    more people should open their eyes. Zeitgeist?

  • whats zeitgeist

  • @Ra3D Jim Hoffman is on the spot. This clip, focusing a lot on the psychological apects of these events, is one of the most convicing speaches on 9/11 I've ever encountered.

  • It's simple intuition that, had these enormous steel structures collapsed, portions of them would have fallen down; they would not have thoroughly pulverized and shredded themselves from top-to-bottom in gigantic explosions "vaporizing" their human occupants so thoroughly that not even a trace could be found to identify more than one thousand victims. from 911 research website

  • well said...

  • hey jizzmonger, your a typical blind american. what else do you need!! maybe you should look at this video again. you talk about facts, there are plenty of facts to support this theory. You must be no older than 18 maybe 20... your government lied to you wake the fuk up....

  • Ok. Try this: Very few explosives were needed to initiate the collapses, the floors collapsed progressively under the weight of the falling caps, (as the official story claims,) perimeter sections peeled off naturally, but more charges were needed to complete the demolition of the cores.

    American political systems are built on false choices. 911 truth gives us many false choices as well. Those who still doubt 911 was an inside job aren't the only ones who need to wake up.

  • What exactly have you done to test your observations? The buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes. Have you read the NIST report? Have you read Hoffman, Jeff King, Steven E Jones and others' responses to the reports? Or did you watch Fox Entertainment?

  • Above is response to 911shillbait911

  • No plane hit 7. Almost ten years later and you still deny the obvious. No plane crashed in Shanksville and a 767 did not hit the Pentagon. Goggle the facts, break through denial.

  • I'm a little confused on your opinions about Hoffman

    Is he credible or not?

    Are his facts accurate or not?

    On his website he provides his detailed research that a plane did in fact hit the Pentagon, and that a plane did in fact crash in Shanksville (though he believes it was possibly shot down)

    So tell me, are his researching skills reliable or not?

    He can't be credible about the towers collapsing "being demolished" but not the other two flights

    You can't have it both ways

  • Psychological operations are a sensitive subject for the uninformed.

  • well spoken

  • Typical truther.

    No facts, just a lot of blather.

  • Typical troll.

    Feces flowing whilst communicating.

  • No, you must have heard the Truthers.....they are always yelling over everyone else while they are talking.

  • True, sorry for the harsh reply.

  • I tried bending over to support the official story but I don't believe in the tooth fairy anymore I wish I could go back it was comforting thinking I would get money if a tooth fell out and it is uncomfortable to know our government lied WTC was a controlled demolitian

  • In other words, you wish you could be like 911ShillBait911? Noooooooooooooooooooooo!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more