so what id basically do in sucha situation: also let him wait ! and then hopefully make him miss the point when priority goes back, so that he loses even more time or completely times out.
these fucking Ultra-Slowrollers are also the reason why i quit MODO, spare some (free) player run pauper events. If there were Judges online, it would be so much better !
It's a dick move to run the clock down so low and then play fast just cause you knew your chances were high to win. Play the F'n game you signed up for and quit being a dick by slow playing ur opponent!
To be honest with you, you lost this match due to poor mulligan decisions. Considering the matchup and your deck I would have kept the opening seven of game 2, and thrown back the horrible all land + brilliant plan opening 7 of game 3. LSV's a better player than me, but I think he'd agree with me now.
a chance-based decision in magic cannot be proven right or wrong based on the outcome of the game. Just because he drew bad hands in game two and then lost game 3 doesnt mean he made the wrong decision. sometimes you make a choice that has a 95% chance of success and 5% chance of failure, and you hit the 5% failure, but that doesnt mean you made the wrong decision
This is a completely wrong statement. He had a great hand game 2 he just threw away based on the other guy having a perfect hand. You can't always assume the opponent has a perfect hand himself. sometimes if the hand is playable you have to keep it. A lot of times it's better than mulling because you are scared to play someone's "perfect hand" his opponent indeed did not have a perfect hand, had to mull, and played one card for like 6 turns. His 2nd game mull decision was a disaster for LSV.
I figured someone else would have said this. Compared to his hand game 2, if LSV would have kept his opener game 2 he would have won game 2 without a crappy game 3. The other guy had to mull game 2 and didn't do anything except a minotaur for like 6 turns. LSV had a chain lightning in the opener game 2. I agree poor mull decisions FTL!!!
Comment removed
XxIcedsoulxX 1 year ago
@XxIcedsoulxX triple red = 10 damage last turn. immolate the 3/3 so you have 2 5 power attackers, hit for 5+4+1 = 10.
LastSasquatch 1 year ago
so what id basically do in sucha situation: also let him wait ! and then hopefully make him miss the point when priority goes back, so that he loses even more time or completely times out.
these fucking Ultra-Slowrollers are also the reason why i quit MODO, spare some (free) player run pauper events. If there were Judges online, it would be so much better !
xmorning666x 1 year ago
It's a dick move to run the clock down so low and then play fast just cause you knew your chances were high to win. Play the F'n game you signed up for and quit being a dick by slow playing ur opponent!
madfrog1 2 years ago
Oh man, just one more turn and... bla. Well played, sir.
DigitalAssassin 2 years ago
Post you winning one again! It's been forever.
DigitalAssassin 2 years ago
Horsemanship wins! Pretty shitty how he took so long. Deserved to lose.
chriskerst 2 years ago
you gave yourself a really good chance to win.. deck was solid tho, online shuffling is bogus
agdstardust 2 years ago
To be honest with you, you lost this match due to poor mulligan decisions. Considering the matchup and your deck I would have kept the opening seven of game 2, and thrown back the horrible all land + brilliant plan opening 7 of game 3. LSV's a better player than me, but I think he'd agree with me now.
hypn0t1c 2 years ago
a chance-based decision in magic cannot be proven right or wrong based on the outcome of the game. Just because he drew bad hands in game two and then lost game 3 doesnt mean he made the wrong decision. sometimes you make a choice that has a 95% chance of success and 5% chance of failure, and you hit the 5% failure, but that doesnt mean you made the wrong decision
jdthom6 2 years ago
Yeah, I didn't see anything wrong with the first hand of game 2 either.
DigitalAssassin 2 years ago
This is a completely wrong statement. He had a great hand game 2 he just threw away based on the other guy having a perfect hand. You can't always assume the opponent has a perfect hand himself. sometimes if the hand is playable you have to keep it. A lot of times it's better than mulling because you are scared to play someone's "perfect hand" his opponent indeed did not have a perfect hand, had to mull, and played one card for like 6 turns. His 2nd game mull decision was a disaster for LSV.
CTastic1 2 years ago
I figured someone else would have said this. Compared to his hand game 2, if LSV would have kept his opener game 2 he would have won game 2 without a crappy game 3. The other guy had to mull game 2 and didn't do anything except a minotaur for like 6 turns. LSV had a chain lightning in the opener game 2. I agree poor mull decisions FTL!!!
CTastic1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CTastic1 Shut the fuck up.
Tyrfing0320 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tyrfing0320 go suck your dick.
CTastic1 1 year ago
God no last card... I wish you had beaten him...
smit1000 2 years ago