Added: 2 years ago
From: ChannelFireball
Views: 3,946
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • @XxIcedsoulxX triple red = 10 damage last turn. immolate the 3/3 so you have 2 5 power attackers, hit for 5+4+1 = 10.

  • so what id basically do in sucha situation: also let him wait ! and then hopefully make him miss the point when priority goes back, so that he loses even more time or completely times out.

    these fucking Ultra-Slowrollers are also the reason why i quit MODO, spare some (free) player run pauper events. If there were Judges online, it would be so much better !

  • It's a dick move to run the clock down so low and then play fast just cause you knew your chances were high to win. Play the F'n game you signed up for and quit being a dick by slow playing ur opponent!

  • Oh man, just one more turn and... bla. Well played, sir.

  • Post you winning one again! It's been forever.

  • Horsemanship wins! Pretty shitty how he took so long.  Deserved to lose.

  • you gave yourself a really good chance to win.. deck was solid tho, online shuffling is bogus

  • To be honest with you, you lost this match due to poor mulligan decisions. Considering the matchup and your deck I would have kept the opening seven of game 2, and thrown back the horrible all land + brilliant plan opening 7 of game 3. LSV's a better player than me, but I think he'd agree with me now.

  • a chance-based decision in magic cannot be proven right or wrong based on the outcome of the game. Just because he drew bad hands in game two and then lost game 3 doesnt mean he made the wrong decision. sometimes you make a choice that has a 95% chance of success and 5% chance of failure, and you hit the 5% failure, but that doesnt mean you made the wrong decision

  • Yeah, I didn't see anything wrong with the first hand of game 2 either.

  • This is a completely wrong statement. He had a great hand game 2 he just threw away based on the other guy having a perfect hand. You can't always assume the opponent has a perfect hand himself. sometimes if the hand is playable you have to keep it. A lot of times it's better than mulling because you are scared to play someone's "perfect hand" his opponent indeed did not have a perfect hand, had to mull, and played one card for like 6 turns. His 2nd game mull decision was a disaster for LSV.

  • I figured someone else would have said this. Compared to his hand game 2, if LSV would have kept his opener game 2 he would have won game 2 without a crappy game 3. The other guy had to mull game 2 and didn't do anything except a minotaur for like 6 turns. LSV had a chain lightning in the opener game 2. I agree poor mull decisions FTL!!!

  • God no last card... I wish you had beaten him...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more