This video has some good nuts and bolts advice, but I strongly disagree that plagiarism is about theft. What it *is* about is *fraud*. You're trying to tell me that what you turned in represents your work, when in fact it does not.
you are stealing someone else's intellectual property. You are then presenting it as your own, and thus you are a fraud, but, you also stole.
Similarly if I steal money from someone, that is theft. If i then go and present it to others, and spend it, that is fraud. But that does not mean that the content was initially stolen
They're not related. If you get permission from the original author but still use the work without properly quoting and citing, it's still plagiarism, but it's not copyright violation.
Theft is something different.still. Look up the difference between rival and non-rival goods. Your example of money is a rival good -- if you have it I can't. Intellectual "property" is non-rival -- if you take it from me, I don't have less of it.
@Divigen Not true. In the Berne Convention countries an author does not have to take ANY action to secure the copyright. The right is automatic once an idea is expressed in a tangible form. Even in the US, the so-called copyright notice is obsolete.
I like good guides - especially since the citation formats and the like become such a pain in the ass to remember, and that overwhelming nature is one of the first steps towards plagiarism - intentional or not.
Though calling a plagiarist a thief is opening up an intellectual / philosophical can of worms in of itself - since plagiarism is defined by lying and fraud, and lying / fraud may lead to theft, but isn't inherently theft - excuse my rambling, spent the day on algebra, brain fried.
That's not the only solution
Plagtracker 1 week ago
Im still having trouble doing this
051290ma 2 weeks ago
Mayes, here voice is so fucking annoying, fuck this im gonna find another video
Roger4313 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Reply if you read this for UN 101
arconnect0 4 months ago
ur voice is so fng anoying!
zF3AR 7 months ago
The background music was 'awesome'...
zhangshu2008 8 months ago
very educating. thanks friend :D
Breemelia 1 year ago
This video has some good nuts and bolts advice, but I strongly disagree that plagiarism is about theft. What it *is* about is *fraud*. You're trying to tell me that what you turned in represents your work, when in fact it does not.
unkilbeeg 1 year ago
@unkilbeeg
you are stealing someone else's intellectual property. You are then presenting it as your own, and thus you are a fraud, but, you also stole.
Similarly if I steal money from someone, that is theft. If i then go and present it to others, and spend it, that is fraud. But that does not mean that the content was initially stolen
Divigen 1 year ago
@Divigen
They're not related. If you get permission from the original author but still use the work without properly quoting and citing, it's still plagiarism, but it's not copyright violation.
Theft is something different.still. Look up the difference between rival and non-rival goods. Your example of money is a rival good -- if you have it I can't. Intellectual "property" is non-rival -- if you take it from me, I don't have less of it.
Plagiarism, however is not related to copyright.
unkilbeeg 1 year ago
@unkilbee
The two are entirely related.
If you do not copyright your work, you cannot take any legal stance when someone else uses or claims it as their own.
Copyrighting provides a legal defense against the theft of intellectual property, and then presentation of that property as ones own.
Divigen 1 year ago
@Divigen
You're right that copyright gives you standing to take legal action if someone makes a copy of your work.
This has nothing to do with plagiarism.
Copyright allows you to place restrictions on who can COPY your work. It has nothing to do with who takes credit for it.
unkilbeeg 1 year ago
@unkilbeeg
the COPY of the work you have made, IS the theft
Divigen 1 year ago
@Divigen
You're talking about copyright. that has nothing to do with plagiarism.
My next exam on intellectual property is going to ask about the difference. Be glad you're not in my class.
unkilbeeg 1 year ago
@unkilbeeg
My next examine will test appeal to authority.
Divigen 1 year ago
@Divigen Not true. In the Berne Convention countries an author does not have to take ANY action to secure the copyright. The right is automatic once an idea is expressed in a tangible form. Even in the US, the so-called copyright notice is obsolete.
nemeczek67 9 months ago
if I use a website/book resource or something... should I use like a bibliography..?
yuiblads 1 year ago
I like good guides - especially since the citation formats and the like become such a pain in the ass to remember, and that overwhelming nature is one of the first steps towards plagiarism - intentional or not.
Though calling a plagiarist a thief is opening up an intellectual / philosophical can of worms in of itself - since plagiarism is defined by lying and fraud, and lying / fraud may lead to theft, but isn't inherently theft - excuse my rambling, spent the day on algebra, brain fried.
travelsonic 1 year ago
what if the source comes from a website?, do you have to quote it?
dante2k8 1 year ago
5 stars!!!
English 101 FTW!
Traparebel 2 years ago
i did not get any thing
pls. explain how to properly paraphrase as per harvard referencing system.
and also if it also needs to be mentioned in the references in the end of an assignment.
123indiaklilpkai 2 years ago
SHIT WAS SOO CASH!!!
urwierdm8 2 years ago
Thanks Stephen Hawking!
dodolurker91 2 years ago
THANK U SO MUCH FOR THIS...the ending music was scary though..hahah
syairazi 2 years ago
It will sure help many to write a research paper without any plagiarism.
Thanks
bigbugs21 3 years ago
good video! thanks for coming up with this instructional video. many will definitely benefit from this.
dennis5777 3 years ago
EXCELLENT JOB
jurandirbeline 3 years ago