We understand that some people watching this video may be misled by Waste Watchers description of our planning application. We are concerned that their presentation of the issues involved does not promote a rational debate on this nationally important subject and may alarm people unnecessarily.
All the issues raisesd by them have been addressed publicly and are availale to view on the Augean website. If you would like further information, please let us know.
@augeanplc But clearly people are alarmed, or they would not be making videos about their concerns for the health and safety of their children, local wildlife and the lifestyle of a small rural village. Our communities are precious, endangered and will be fiercely defended. There is nothing irrational about this and better Augean should be put on alert, that either their information on this nationally important subject is inadequate, or serious, valid concerns exist and have not been addressed.
@augeanplc I hope you handle waste more carefully than you spell.
Having studied your planning application I think the video is pretty accurate. What is rational about receiving dry nuclear waste and creating radioactive leachate by letting rainwater soak into it? Do you even have a licence to handle liquid nuclear waste?...
@augeanplc People are alarmed because your safety case is a house of cards. You say you have “undertaken risk assessments for all credible scenarios”. But you omit the exposure pathway from road dust that was so significant in the scandal in nearby Corby. The community of Kings Cliffe will live in this dust and walk it into their homes....
@augeanplc Your (so-called) low-level radiation model has been forensically discredited as in the case of Stuart Dyson. Comparison with background radiation and radon is misleading: the waste will contain extremely toxic unnatural sources such as plutonium which have radically different biological effects....
@augeanplc Your quantitative risk assessment relies not on experience but computer models. Disasters resulting from this blind approach are legion. Recent examples include the mispricing of complex financial instruments and the swine flu pandemic that wasn’t. That’s why your planning application has gone down like a rat sandwich.
Absolutely TERRIFYING! Unconscionable. What madmen have decided to DO this- it's a crime of genocide against the entire British nation!
soapbxprod 6 months ago
Leechate cocktail gone mad.
michaelpajak 1 year ago
I'm commenting now
michaelpajak 1 year ago
The boy stood on the burning deck,
Picking his bum like mad,
He rolled the poo into little balls
And flicked them at his Dad.
If the Kings Cliffe plans go ahead, the floodgates will open for nuclear waste to be shoddily landfilled all over the country.
Write, email and lobby those who you think can help nip this crazy scheme in the bud.
abcman75 1 year ago
stamp licked...Now just got to get from here to the post box...Come on everybody, take action, lick that stamp.
abcman75 1 year ago
Just written my letter.
Took me under 20 mins.
Wastewatchers website is good for letter writing tips.
Come on everybody, take action, pick up your pen.
abcman75 1 year ago
We understand that some people watching this video may be misled by Waste Watchers description of our planning application. We are concerned that their presentation of the issues involved does not promote a rational debate on this nationally important subject and may alarm people unnecessarily.
All the issues raisesd by them have been addressed publicly and are availale to view on the Augean website. If you would like further information, please let us know.
augeanplc 1 year ago
@augeanplc But clearly people are alarmed, or they would not be making videos about their concerns for the health and safety of their children, local wildlife and the lifestyle of a small rural village. Our communities are precious, endangered and will be fiercely defended. There is nothing irrational about this and better Augean should be put on alert, that either their information on this nationally important subject is inadequate, or serious, valid concerns exist and have not been addressed.
emmalouiseregan 1 year ago
Comment removed
emmalouiseregan 1 year ago
@augeanplc I hope you handle waste more carefully than you spell.
Having studied your planning application I think the video is pretty accurate. What is rational about receiving dry nuclear waste and creating radioactive leachate by letting rainwater soak into it? Do you even have a licence to handle liquid nuclear waste?...
DrArijigoku 1 year ago
@augeanplc People are alarmed because your safety case is a house of cards. You say you have “undertaken risk assessments for all credible scenarios”. But you omit the exposure pathway from road dust that was so significant in the scandal in nearby Corby. The community of Kings Cliffe will live in this dust and walk it into their homes....
DrArijigoku 1 year ago
@augeanplc Your (so-called) low-level radiation model has been forensically discredited as in the case of Stuart Dyson. Comparison with background radiation and radon is misleading: the waste will contain extremely toxic unnatural sources such as plutonium which have radically different biological effects....
DrArijigoku 1 year ago
Comment removed
DrArijigoku 1 year ago
@augeanplc Your quantitative risk assessment relies not on experience but computer models. Disasters resulting from this blind approach are legion. Recent examples include the mispricing of complex financial instruments and the swine flu pandemic that wasn’t. That’s why your planning application has gone down like a rat sandwich.
DrArijigoku 1 year ago
Misled in what way?
ilovemoss 1 year ago
There's a clip about the row on The Politics Show. Google: Row over nuclear waste dump
DrArijigoku 1 year ago