I have SUFFERED, & still am, from mercury amalgam toxicity for over a quarter of a century. I was led to the path of Biological Dentistry through Hal Huggins & there began becoming EDUCATED about these dental NIGHTMARES & my health, starting in my mouth. I had all my heinous amalgams removed from my mouth properly; teeth extracted; & currently have mercury embedded in 3 quadrants of my mouth. I still have LOTS to do & am pissed how this has wreaked in my life & $!
@70sCher I do sympathize with you and thank goodness you found out about the dirty little secret that "silver" fillings are really quicksilver fillings. You are not alone in your pain.
The problem continues as government agencies who are being paid to protect employees OSHA, the environment EPA and regulate implants to require definitive evidence of safety FDA have abdicated their responsibilities to the trade association ADA that trains dentists and advocates mercury for the poor.
Well you guys let your cavities get larger until you have no teeth and can no longer eat, and I'll have all my cavities filled, and we will see who lives longer. :D
Focus here for a moment. This is not about tooth decay. It is about fraud and deceptive marketing of mercury as silver. Never once telling the public that mercury from mercury/silver dental fillings is BY FAR the largest source of human exposure to mercury.
Dentists careless disregard for OSHA safe handling also accounts for a substantial percentage of environmental damage. Every day hundreds of women employees in dental offices are rendered infertile. That's a crime
Look up smoking tooth on Google. Read the Quackbuster article. This guy has a good point, water vapor would also be visible in front if this screen and would rise, whereas mercury vapor would sink.Didn't he say the tooth was dipped in warm water? (1:12-1:14)
@BenAndSandraEvans Not correct though because we've totally refuted this facetious claim by self-appointed experts who ignore the laws of physics and if you'd bothered to look at even one of the several video responses you'd see PURE LIQUID MERCURY rising from a bowl looking just exactly like the Smoking Tooth. (You do recall that hot air rises?) In others vids we use alternative means of measuring the mercury. Or you can read a detailed analysis of the laws of physics IAOMT
@BenAndSandraEvans Yes we raised the temperature of that demonstration with warm water then dried the tooth. However, even if water were present, it is not, water vapor is not visible under 253.7 nm light. Then he scraped a dry with a knife and it again spewed. Then he rubbed the filling with a pencil eraser.
To date every scientist who has MEASURED the amount of mercury that leaks from so called "Silver" fillings has found lots. World Health Organization Hg Criteria 118.
@davidkennedydds Okay, Okay. It's dangerous. I get that. I did check out the other videos, and by no means want to discourage people from removing deadly substances from their body. At the same time, is it not a good idea to check out the details until one understands instead of just going along with a common conception? So continue to investigate I will. Quick question... Why is the mercury vapor visible in front of the blue light on 1:56 - 1:58? That's not uv 253.7 nm is it?
am not sure what to do , I have one old amalgam filling, I want it removed but then Composite fillings are made of glass quartz mixed with resin. They are applied to the tooth in layers and cured with light or chemicals which cause also health problems . Porcelain fillings are sculpted based on a picture of your tooth and then cemented with dental glue. and did research it does hormonal balance, chemical imbalances, am fuck either way .
@alohastar No you're not in too much trouble I don't think. Composites do not necessarily leak any estrogen mimics so select one that doesn't or like you said use a cad-cam porcelain or fully cured resin filling. I did primarily indirect composite inlays if the filling was big.
If you check with the FDA there are zero adverse reports on composite releasing hormones and if you want to watch dozens of people blast the FDA hearing see then on You Tube like my vid "Got Mercury".
Mercury fillings were started in the US by two French men Cracour brothers who called these toxic plugs ROYAL MINERAL SEGUNDUM. With emphasis on the dumb. They dared not call them mercury because everyone knows mercury is a deadly poison and calling them what they are is bad for business.
Today US dental students are admonished to never call them mercury. Always deny that they are linked to any medical disorder and lie to their patients. it is totally unethical and yet still going on.
@davidkennedydds Why is it used? What was the original reason for choosing mercury to use? Do you know? And why is it still used? Is there some property it has that makes it somehow ideal for these purposes?? Or is it just total nefarious, shitty evil reasons for them doing this.
@dialectical44 I've not spent a lot of time examining that product but I have heard som opinions that might make you somewhat cautious about taking it without supervision. It does seem to get the mercury moving but then that might be a problem rather than a benefit. The best thing to suck mercury up like a sponge is N1, N3-bis (2-mercaptoethyl)-isothalamide OSR which unfortunately is not available at this time. It took my mercury to zero in 6 months.
So NAC only mobilizes mercury and doesn't remove it through the urine? It is a precursor of Glutathione production. Sulfhydral.compounds are crucial to celluar health and Gluutatione production
@dialectical44 Some does exit the urine but typically you do not want to expose kidneys to mercury as it harms them. Mercury was used as a diuretic for many years and thus we have extensive evidence of how sensitive kidneys are to mercury. Any chelator properly designed would do what glutathione does and exit through the bowel.
You are correct NAC is one of the building blocks of glutathione but you body has to make it in order to benefit. Swallowing glutathione is of no benefit.
@dialectical44 Yes that is correct it can be. Yet the fundamental problem is raising intracellular glutathione. I've not seen any study yet showing NAC supplementation does that effectively. It is very difficult to do if the person continues to be exposed to elements that exhausts their intracellular glutathione.
@davidkennedydds i am using detoxified chlorine dioxide,alternating with calcium hypochlorite (CAP),with 16 oz of water(orally ingested)=hypochlorous acid- .the relief is almost instantionous and lasts for several hours but its temporary,but i need to get my mercury crowns removed.as it is i am screwed by the effects of these amalgams/chronic candida.
@dialectical44, there's Humet-R - humet(dot)com - 100% safe and very mild. Click "Humet-R", then "Humet-R" to buy. No guarantee it will clear mercury from the brain (according to a medical book, no chelator does), but it may.
@threethreetwothree33 Removing mercury from where it is attached to the high sulfur tissues of the brain is very difficult. I know of only one substance that does this effectively N1, N3-bis (2-mercaptoethyl)-isothalamide which is not currently available. People who took this recovered from tremors and neurological impairment indicating to me that the product at least attenuated the mercury.
@davidkennedydds, I've heard that some products can be dangerous as they dislodge mercury and it can end up elsewhere. Humet-R merely helps flush out mercury your body is trying to remove - so not like the product you mentioned.
Strange how governments are happy to 'saturate' the environment with mercury (latest article says mercury enters the soil through rainfall, which then gets into our food) - but do nothing to advise people on removing mercury from their bodies - no surprise really!
This is true and all who say its not dangerous are completely ignorant. I'm living proof of this. I was crazy, suicidal, tired, forgetfully, foggy minded, emotional, outburst of rage, lazy ( but knew I wasn't really), I was loosing my mind. I had just 3 removed, still have two to go. I felt instantly better after the removal of 3, like I had woke up from a bad dream. I feel like I have my life back. Amalgams are from hell and the Nazi ADA needs to be punished for crimes against humanity!
Thank you for sharing how mercury has so dramatically impacted your life. I can tell that since you go better so fast you were not over exposed during the removal. This is very important as all of your symptoms indicated you were very much on the edge of the threshold.
Unfortunately for many is that after going over the threshold coming back is not easy and not always possible. A step in the wrong direction off the construction elevator at the top floor, a step back is too late.
@SelflessEmpire There are a few reasons you are wrong. The body cannot remove metals from itself. That's why heavy metal poisoning must be treated with chelation therapy. Removing the fillings would have no effect on any metal already absorbed into your body. If the metals were making you crazy, like you claim, removing the fillings would do absolutely nothing. The fact that you "felt instantly better" shows that it could not possibly be metal poisoning, and almost certainly psychosomatic.
@SelflessEmpire As to the legitimacy of this video, there is an easy way to disprove the claim that we are seeing mercury vapor. Mercury vapor is heavier than air. The smoke we see in this video is rising. Mercury vapor does not rise in air, it sinks, like CO2 vapor from dry ice. There is nothing in fillings that would produce rising vapor. Check your periodic table, you can double-check the atomic weights. The tooth was dipped in water, and what we see here is water vapor.
@altoidyoda whether you believe the video to be legitimate is irrelevant. Its now proven that it releases mercury continuously throughout the life of the filling with or without the video.
That's it? I go on vacation and the posting stops??? Come on people, entertain me with your "I read it on the internet, so it must be true!" mentality....
From Cabo San Lucas I can tell you're in need of some time away from the chair to clear your head.
When you get back please tell me why you are not a criminal because you obviously are not in compliance with the employee protections of OSHA. One plausible explanation is you have no employees. I can think of no other.
@davidkennedydds You don't know anything about me, or really anything else for that matter. Are you vacationing in Cabo with all the money you scammed from poor desperate people that you were trying to "cure"?
@TheHgDDS Since I am not in practice that I guess makes you the criminal implanting time-release mercury tooth plugs in unsuspecting people while claiming they are safe without a shadow of evidence to support the claims.
I see many legal charges in your future perhaps including negligent misrepresentation, toxic tort for injury, inadequate informed consent, failure to comply with environmental protections and Occupational protections.
@TheHgDDS I do know all about you and I know you pack mercury in peoples teeth while telling them it is perfectly safe. Liar liar pants on fire. I don't charge anyone for anything so it is YOU who are the one who preys on poor people taking money for Mercury while claiming your selling silver.
I repeat, "All mercury fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury." WHO Mercury Criteria Document 118 Average person receives 17µg/day from 12 fillings.
if you had not used animals in your investigation referred here, I would share this video with more people.....I have all of my back teeth with amalgams and I have had two really bad crisis, and when I say bad I mean seriously bad....this is very dangerous........I say NO to the use of animals in this investigation, this is all too bad to make it worse. Regards.
Animals were used to by Vimy Lorscheider in order to prove beyond doubt that radioactive mercury exists fillings rapidly and deposits in critical organs. Had the dentists responded this tragedy would have ceased.
Instead the advocates for time-release mercury fillings implanted 250 orphans in Casa Pia Portugal with mercury without informed consent in a poorly designed study that combined all data to claim this horribly unethical experiment proved amalgam safe. (More)
In fact, when the data is appropriately analyzed so those with no fillings, then a few fillings are compared with those who have more amalgam fillings a clear definitive dose dependent indicator of systemic injury “A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children’s dental amalgam trial (2010) “ is shown.
Yes we used animals but the dentist poisoned orphan children. Your choice?
@allenrobinson2012 Your response is decidedly different than the 500000 others and if you go read the hundreds of questions I've answered you'll see a pattern I think of only dentists having trouble understanding the video.
Google Stacy Case of fox News Memphis and see how watching this video save her from MS. She went and got her amalgams safely removed and now she can not only walk again but dance as well. Her children will have a Mom to look after them and it almost didn't happened.
@allenrobinson2012 And no SAFE LEVEL of mercury has been found according to both the EPA and WHO so when dentists claim the exposure to amalgam mercury is safe then ask what level do they consider safe and be sure they give you a reference.
@allenrobinson2012 You do have the right to legitimate accuract informed consent prior to any treatment.
Calling a mercury filling a "Silver" amalgam is a deceptive business practice that is taught in the institutions where dental students are indoctrinated with the garbage that the ADA says passes for science.
This is criminal in my opinion and should be addressed immediately by every state attorney general. Use Yellow Pages to see who advertises Silver Filling and file the complaint today.
@allenrobinson2012 All studies to date have found minimal BPA from many brands of BisGMA composites and none from others so this issue is easily resolved by merely NOT using the kind that has a potential for BPA. On the other hand there is no brand of amalgam that does not release copious amounts of mercury. The new high copper ones leak as much as 14 times some older brands. Seems the increase in prostate more closely parallels the use of copper in dental amalgam.
@allenrobinson2012 Ummm, yeah. I keep telling you, I don't place amalgams. If I keep posting that, will you eventually read it. And maybe accept that maybe, just maybe, I actually don't place amalgams. I only go on this board to have fun at Kennedy's expense. I'm not pro or anti amalgam. I just don't place amalgams. Oh, one other thing. I don't place amalgams, either. You know I keep saying amalgam, and you keep saying mercury filling. Just in case I'm getting you mixed up. Same thing
@allenrobinson2012 Now you're making sense. Kennedy argues that there is no middle ground. And his crappy video is NOT hard evidence. You're ok allenrobinson2012, just don't call me a criminal again. I'm not one of the bad guys like Kennedy.
@TheHgDDS Hmmm, lets see if you are or are not a criminal guilty of abusing the trust of your employees. As you know I raised the issue of whether or not your practice is mercury-safe and compliant with the laws of this nation.
OSHA spells out exactly how when and where you may expose employees and sets the requirements for doing so.
DO YOU HAVE RECORDS OF MONITORING YOUR EMPLOYEES, TRAINING, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, WORK PRACTICES AND ENGINEERING CONTROLS?
@TheHgDDS In the video after the short demonstration I cite evidence that mercury exists amalgam fillings in sheep and monkeys and distributes widely. The kidneys of the sheep lost 60% of their ability to clear inulin. Pathophysiology is evidence of harm.
DeRoo reported in a study involving 1,336 infants born in Norway during a 7-year period, women who had mercury fillings placed in the first or second month of pregnancy had roughly quadrupled odds of giving birth to an infant with cleft palate
@TheHgDDS So now you've resorted to character assassination. Well I should expect as much from a criminal who exposes his/her patients and employees to mercury without any regard for their health or the law.
NOTE TO DENTAL EMPLOYEES: GO WATCH "POISON IN YOUR DENTISTS OFFICE" and then file anonymous complaints with OSHA to get it cleaned up and your reproductive health protected.
I can see you just want to make shit up and then decry the shit you made up.
You don't have to remove amalgams. You may like exposure to mercury. You may like having cancer.
But what if you don't like mercury or cancer? Then as individuals we get to make our own decisions.
But what has to stop are the lies that dentists spew about how safe mercury is that distort the facts. They have to protect their staff and stop poisoning their patients and the environment with mercury
@allenrobinson2012 Lets not get the apples confused with the oranges shall we. Smoking Teeth is HARD evidence. As hard as evidence can get in fact. You see elemental mercury vapor coming from a 25 year-old amalgam filling and the story goes on to cite numerous peer reviewed scientific studies that found exactly the same thing using various methods and conditions. Doesn't get much harder than that.
To blog about Dr. Godfrey's lecture I suggest we go there as that topic is related to that video.
@allenrobinson2012 This is a statement of fact the fundamental foundation of observational evidence. I can state a simple fact and not expect someone extrapolate to the global. In debate this is called the Strawman argument. You set up a factitious argument so you can defeat it in debating. It is a well recognized ploy of the disinformation machine that sadly is often enough to convince the less well educated.
It is not a valid debating technique and will likely cost you points with the judges
@allenrobinson2012 BPA is absolutely a valid dental issue and one that needs some careful research as we don't need to throw the baby out with the wash. FYI all composites do not contain Bis-GMA a close relative of BPA. Bid-GMA apparently does not have the same estrogenic capacity as BPA but nevertheless should be looked at very carefully I agree.
However as a dentist I can tell you that it was having a sealant I can bond to enamel eliminated any need for mercury as a filling.
Go watch my video "Poison in Your Dentists Office" and see if you cannot think of a way that you may have an impact and at the same time protect some unsuspecting employee as well. We have laws about occupational exposure that basically make the dentist guilty until proven innocent if they do not have complete written records of routine daily office monitoring and measured levels of mercury vapor.
No records? They are guilty. So lets enforce that to end this sad story.
@allenrobinson2012 Sadly like you I feel Bradley's troubles are out of my hands but you are dead wrong that you cannot do something about the mercury issue.
In fact you can join DAMS and begin to show up, write letters, blog and even more you can identify people you know who work in dental offices that use mercury and encourage them to file anonymous complaints with OSHA over workplace safety. The dentist cannot legally open mixed dental amalgam so lets have some law enforcement.
@allenrobinson2012 I think you must very a very confused person to think that showing a remarkable story is in anyway reflective of my credibility. If you believe that knowledge comes from evidence and that observation is a fundamental tool of science that you will wish to reflect for some time on Dr. Godfrey's clearly explained and documented observation. If not then please prepare a video of your own that documents some remarkable event that the whole world would like to see.
@allenrobinson2012 If you think the lecture was presented as PROOF then I suggest you go watch it again as your are definitely confused about the content.
What you watched is merely a lecture. Nothing more and nothing less. The fact that no one else can show you anything even remotely like this should be of interest to anyone researching the conditions that produce cancer. It certainly got my attention.
Now go watch Rooted and see if you think keeping dead teeth is a good idea.
@allenrobinson2012 "I'm not qualified to discuss the safety of the fillings I use, but dental bodies say it's safe, and that's why I use it". Ok. that's fair. EXCEPT I DON'T USE IT!!! Jesus tapdancing Christ. Are you deaf (or blind, asthere is no soundhere). I don't place amalgams. And I dont pooh pooh the research, just the dickheads that tell you they will cure your MS, etc, by taking out your amalgams. Those are thecriminals. They're the thieves and liars.
@allenrobinson2012 ok, wait a second. Did I put an amalgam in your mouth? Seriously? I told you -- I don't use amalgam. Is your name Marvin? "Having a degrees doesn't make you a scientist"? Ok, and having a computer doesn't mean anything you post is credible. By how I write... Screw you stupid.
Allen can you clarify for me what your attitude about implanted time release mercury fillings is?
Seems you decry an estrogen mimic but have not addressed the hormone disrupting effects of mercury a proven consequence of occupational exposure in dentists.
I don't like either mercury or BPA being implanted without evidence of safety. That is my position. It is the responsibility and law for the manufacturers to furnish definitive evidence of safety before approval.
@allenrobinson2012 Yes just one case but what you cannot see in a 3 minute clip is a 2 hour discussion with extensive Q&A. All research begins with a theory and then observation. What I am showing is an observable outcome based upon the theory that interventions in the oral cavity may have produced the injury (cancer) and that removal of the insult may help resolve the injury. Dr. Godfrey also intervened with IV Vitamin C and homeopathic. This is way beyond my area of expertise but interesting
@allenrobinson2012 Correction, Dr. Godfrey was speaking not only about mercury but root canals. The point is that no one I know can do anything like this with breast cancer. So if one resolved then why aren't there studies funded to assess early breast cancer detection with Thermogram and how these condition can or cannot be resolved with interventions.
We don't do that kind of research because ti might show what is causal for this common problem and thus no one is looking at stopping cancer
@allenrobinson2012 No actually I do agree that baby bottles and the little sucky things every mom sticks in the baby';s mouth should not contain BPA either. We are on the same page here. Just take it out.
By "David Kennedy under a different name" do you mean the David Kennedy who hasn't apparently paid his student loans that I get call on every day or so? David if you're listening pay the dam bill! I am tired of getting calls from collectors for your debt.
@allenrobinson2012 The IAOMT is well aware of the BPA issue and to bring the focus of science on that issue we have on more than one occasion funded research into how much BPA is released from composite fillings. In addition on our website you can see a risk assessment on the other components of composite as well.
Although the sample was small and we are in the process of expanding the database with further testing the preliminary results are reassuring for the majority of brands of composite.
@allenrobinson2012 Allen you've got the exact answer to why this issue has gone on for almost 100 years. Dentists have virtually no training in toxicology and thus make toxicological blunders daily. The IAOMT was formed to try and correct this deficiency and so far we've only scratched the surface. if you know a dentist who would like to understand the impact of dental materials on health and well being please send them to the next IAOMT meeting. Help number of educated dentists keep growing.
@allenrobinson2012 Ummmm, I didn't see a real question. Unless it was "are you a dentist?" You don't even know me. How do you know I'm not a scientist? And it's Doctor Dentist to you, assface. When did I charge you for shit advice? And I'm not a criminal. Amalgam is legal. Go ahead and check. It is. But I DON'T USE AMALGAM!!!!! I thought theHgDDS was a funny name. Like Turd Fergusen. That's a funny name. You are stupid, and should keep listening to morons on message boards.
@allenrobinson2012 I'd say he sounds more mercury poisoned than anything else. See how he dodges every specific question like for example whether or not he is compliant with the OSHA laws of this country requiring employee protections?
Mercury causes the inability think. It seems to be more the problem that anything else. Just imagine what fun the prosecuting attorney will have with his posts when one of his/her injured employees sues.
@allenrobinson2012 Question: How does one who has multiple degrees and spent years in academia go about pretending to be a scientist in your opinion?
Could it just be you do not like all the research that is cited in this brief documentary that is the issue rather than a pretense of some academic knowledge of toxicology?
@MisterBadLuck FYI Hot gas rises. That is why Chinese coal fired power plants are polluting the streams in the Rocky Mountains.
Because of this never ending inaccurate criticism the next time Dr. Eichman demonstrated this for filmmaker Steve Kroschel "The Beautiful Truth" I asked that he not use heat. Instead he used a pocket knife and it floated gently toward the floor. Be sure to notice the truly enormous amounts of mercury that spew when a new filling is mixed well above OSHA's ceiling limit
@SimplyForAlexia Perhaps you'd better go watch Smoking Teeth again because you seem to have forgotten soooo much. Mercury must have addled your feeble brain.
Conclusion: It is the opinion of this academy that responsible government agencies should prohibit the
use of these fillings until such time as their manufacturers produce the alleged evidence
@SimplyForAlexia Actually that is a big fat lie. Virtually all research that measured mercury coming off amalgams has found an enormous amount. Did you go watch Dr. Richardson "Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings" like I asked? Then you would undoubtedly noticed the graph of all the recent studies showing how much over the scientifically derived minimum risk level (MRL) for exposure to mercury. Some showing many times the MRL.
If so then you should comply with existing laws and classify any substance implanted into a natural or man-made body cavity as Class III and require the manufacture to furnish proof of safety.
What does it cost to fix teeth with bio-compatible materials? Actually much less than destroying the teeth and brains with mercury releasing ones for sure.
With no proof of safety you should stop putting in mercury fillings.
@SimplyForAlexia The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology is extremely concerned
about the anecdotal claims of safety by manufacturers and dental trade associations that
are at variance with the published peer-reviewed scientific evidence to the contrary.
The Precautionary Principal requires action once the possibility of harm exists. It does not require proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that in the case of heavy metal and xenobiotic exposure is both nearly impossible unnecessa
@SimplyForAlexia The video presentation titled Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas highlights more than a decade
of scientific research funded by the IAOMT that is the basis for our statement of concern regarding the amount of mercury leaking from set silver amalgam fillings.
Voice Over:
All mercury/silver fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury constantly. The amount increases with any kind of stimulation and as a result, mercury from fillings produces the majority of human exposure to mercury.
@SimplyForAlexia I'll let the documentation speak for itself. Scientific evidence is the path to truth.
All mercury fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury and as a result mercury from amalgam is by far the predominant source of human exposure to mercury WHO CD 118. Mercury is now linked to Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Low birth-weight babies, Autism, ALS, MS, IDCM, and hear disease. Where do it come from?
I can't wait to hear the guilty party squeal when they sit before the jury;-)
@SimplyForAlexia Yah sure. I am the problem and not the implanting of mercury inn millions of teeth while calling it silver. Keep up the fake blogging. It is amusing.
@SimplyForAlexia Your actions speak loudly about your dishonorable, unethical, nefarious intentions.
You are doing your level best (not very well I might add) to deceive those reading this blog. You claim without evidence to have a secret body of information that will prove implanting time-release mercury fillings are safe yet whenever this issue has a thorough examination of the available evidence it is clearly shown to be unsafe. Unsafe because mercury amalgam makes blood mercury go way UP.
@SimplyForAlexia I did? Please explain where you saw this all inclusive diagnosis? Expect once again No response because this is a made up claim.
What I said was clearly mercury fillings cause EXPOSURE. Whether or not an individual becomes poisoned is another question that involves such nuances as concurrent exposure to lead, Apolipoprotein E, selenium and a host of other factors. Diagnose of a disorder is not my desire or intent.
We've proved substantial mercury exposure and that is enough.
So how can you tell @SimplyForAlexia is Fake? First check out his/her channel. No personal information, 55 views and a stolen track of music. This is typical of FAKE bloggers. They set up a new name every few days and spew their deception trying to keep the lid on the mercury/silver filling crime-of-the-century.
Latest research (Kim 2011) has linked newborn baby's blood level of mercury to lower than the normal birth weight and lower weight 2 years later. That means a lifetime of problems.
@davidkennedydds Kim et al. Mercury levels in maternal and cord blood and attained weight through the
24 months of life 2011.
Snapp showed way back in 1981 that after carefully removing all amalgam fillings the blood mercury level dropped 90%. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude then that since 1 out of 6 US babies are born with umbilical cord blood levels sufficient to cause brain damage that 90% of that damage is due to the use of mercury/silver amalgam tooth fillings.
@davidkennedydds WARNING dentists use mercury during pregnancy. Snapp, Molin, Frykholm and others found that immediately after removing mercury/silver fillings the blood mercury went UP even if the teeth were pulled out!
So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby you must get all your mercury fillings out safely and carefully. To do that you have to plan at least 7 months and some say a year ahead then get the mother's blood mercury checked prior to becoming pregnant.
@davidkennedydds You are insane. You MUST get all your amalgams removed???? By who, you? For how much. In one place on this board, you're saying it's more harmful to take them out because the blood level increases. Here you say you MUST have them removed to have a healthy baby. My wife has some old amalgams. My kids are fine. You're an idiot. How can you say shit like this to people
@TheHgDDS Any you've excelled in anger management too you say. Are you confused or what?
Please explain to me where you got the idea that I thought you should have some fool remove all your amalgams? Do you just make shit up and then spew? What I said was these mercury-leaking fillings should be banned and the advocates (Yourself) should be required to provide proof of safety and since they cannot do that they should:
@davidkennedydds "So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby you must get all your mercury fillings out safely and carefully. To do that you have to plan at least 7 months and some say a year ahead then get the mother's blood mercury checked prior to becoming pregnant. " This is what you wrote 3 post above. Are you that stupid that you don't even realize what YOU posted?!? The first part of that says you must get your fillings out, doesn't it????
@TheHgDDS Actually it says you may get your fillings out before IF you want to maximize your chances of having a healthy intelligent cleft palate free child. DeRoo explained. “Among mothers who have amalgam fillings, the number of fillings they have correlates with mercury measured in cord blood and breast milk.”
When fillings placed in the first or second month of pregnancy very significant near quadrupling of the odds of giving birth to an infant with isolated cleft palate (odds ratio, 3.6)
@davidkennedydds NO. You wrote "you must remove your mercury fillings". That is what YOU wrote. I can see it on my monitor right now. Are you actually denying that you wrote it??? Maybe some dolt with a mouth full of amalgams snuck on your conputer and wrote it. You are effing dumb dumb dumb!
@TheHgDDS Now I know it is hard because you obviously have been sniffing a whole lot of mercury but please try to read the whole sentence before you spew. "So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby" . . . were the two condition.
What if you don't care if the baby has an IQ above a snake? Then get a job working for some idiot dentist who willy nilly packs mercury in to everyone's teeth calling it silver and totally ignoring all of the occupational health and safety laws.
@TheHgDDS The manufacturers say mercury/silver fillings are not for use in pregnant women and what if you do not know if she is pregnant? Germany, Austria recommend NO amalgams in young women regardless because they may become pregnant. What I think shows the insanity of this whole issue is the Devil-may-care attitude dentists display toward the pregnancy outcome of both their patients and their staff.
There is no doubt that both of these populations are currently being injured by Hg dentists.
@davidkennedydds And I don't place amalgams. Not on prego's, kids or anyone. And not because your said it's not safe. It's because people like composites more. I'm a people person. I give em what they want.
@TheHgDDS So you "Give'em what they want". . some might call that a whore but then that may be disrespectful of the oldest profession. But since you do drill out old mercury fillings and correct me if I am wrong but I'll wager without any employee or patients protections whatsoever you thuse create a bolus dose of mercury that will unquestionably impact a fetus.
Or do you also protect your patients "people person" because I can assure you without a doubt that is exactly "What they want"?
@davidkennedydds You don't even know, the quality of work I do (certainly superior to yours), and you compare me to your mother, I mean, a whore. You are an ass. Actually, you're just stupid. You spit out references to studies that are biased and unscientific to make yourself sound smart, and then you can't even remember the drivel you posted.
@TheHgDDS That anger management thing again. Now focus here. I know it is hard but I merely asked if you followed the Occupational Health and Safety Laws regarding mercury exposure that specifically state, "When it is reasonable to assume that exposure is likely the employer shall:
1. Provide informed consent
2. Protective Equipment
3. Institute Work Practices
4. Engineering Controls
5. Monitor the Workplace
6. Monitor the Employees
7. Keep records of all of the above for 30 years.
@davidkennedydds Sure, I monitor everything. And as soon as I see any of them getting Alz or MS, I'll make sure they go right to one of those IAOMT morons and he can offer her her false hopes....
I've only owned my office for 12 years, so I guess I'm guilty of the last one.
@TheHgDDS So I take it from your off the wall response that you have not been measuring your office or staff and providing the equipment and protections required in all 50 state.
The interesting thing about mercury is that the delay in symptoms may be as much as 20 years hence the OSHA requirement for 30 years of records. When one of your staff files an unlawful exposure complaint with OSHA I don't think you will be quite so flippant when the inspectors arrive and your record book is empty.
DeRoo (2010) “Among mothers who have amalgam fillings, the number of fillings they have correlates with mercury measured in cord blood and breast milk.”
Lederman (2008) Higher cord blood mercury was associated with reductions in developmental scores at 36 and 48 months, after adjusting for the positive effects of fish/seafood consumption during pregnancy.
Clearly The-Mercury-Packing Dentists' fillings are harming his/her patient's babies. FYI more mercury is bad for children. EPA says 1 in 6.
@SimplyForAlexia This is exactly the deception I warned you all about. Once again the FAKE blogger tries to deceive you into thinking you can see mercury vapor under 253.7 nm light. You cannot see anything but mercury with atomic absorbency. I would refer anyone interested in the detailed reference rebuttal to this idiotic argument to iaomt.blogspot.com.
So why would Faker blogger do that? Because seeing is believing and they do do not want you to see what mercury packing dentists are doing.
@davidkennedydds Correction water vapor is not visible under 253.7 nm light.
Atomic Absorption (AA) is a very sound analytical method used widely in research and medicine. Most elements and compounds have a light signature and when you vaporize a variety of unknown substances through AA you can determine what it actually is. They used this on CSI if you were watching using hair.
Example: Napoleon's hair was unusually high in arsenic thus indicating he was possibly murdered by the British.
@SimplyForAlexia Oh but of course you did offend anyone who has taken the trouble to get a post graduate degree. The term doctor is not the same as physician which is what you meant. What I usually say is dentists can only poison their patients and after they have done that the patient has to call 911 or seek medical attention because dentists are not by license allowed to diagnose nor treat any of the disorders mercury fillings cause except of course dead and broken teeth.
@davidkennedydds I don't think we like it for the same reasons. I like the conflicts, how everyone's opinion is fact, etc. I respect that you have an opinion on this subject, however crazy I might find your opinion to be. And I respect that you think that if I place an amalgam in someone's head, I might destroy their life. Even if I think you're crazy for thinking that. Please keep entertaining me......
@TheHgDDS You are not my concern. The fact that you are willing to destroy someones life in order to make a buck is. My job is the same as a sign post. I merely provide information.
EPA found 1 out of 6 baby's blood is high in mercury.
Kim et al (2011) have shown this is verybad for the baby.
Snapp proved blood mercury was from amalgam.
MSDS say amalgam is not safe for women during pregnancy.
Who would defend you for assaulting a woman with mercury when the baby is harmed? Tell it to the jury.
@TheHgDDS You mistake opinion for research findings. While it is true that research can reflect the opinions of the researcher it is equally true that the modern methods of blinding the data from the investigators provides some protection against such biases. Further the use of statistical methods to determine if the results are significant to the 95% level further protects and validates the findings.
What research do you posses showing infant exposure to mercury from amalgam is within the MRL?
@TheHgDDS you ar a fake shill for the ada.u actually are not a dentist,or scientist.if im wrong post your business address to prove u r who /what u say u r.where is your dental clinic that has been around for 12 years?
prove it.
i predict u will make up an excuse to not tell us your business name/address,because u r not what u say u r.
Yaah! our secret evidence I've got to beg you to share with others. I just wonder what could have come over all those scientists at the University of Calgary Medical School publishing the results of their research for the whole world to see. Secret research is what we all need to push for and Alexia (rimes with dyslexia) will lead the way for us if we only trust her. LOL
@SimplyForAlexia So hear again the paid-FAKE-blogger decries my unwillingness to take her word-for-it that she has some secret information that she will not, has not, cannot share with us but insists we contact her directly. Her approach is the opposite of mine.
I put every thing up front and in the video. I even show you the copies of the actual peer reviewed scientific studies the IAOMT helped fund. What has she done except bellyache about my criticism and not having a blog of her own?
@SimplyForAlexia You seem to have endless amounts fo time to blog on this video but did you ever once go ewatch
Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings
See the graph prepared by Dr. Richardson below the picture on the first page. As you can see every single study that measured human body burden or exposure to mercury found huge amounts coming from amalgam. The exception ADAs Mackert who did not measure but "Estimated" the amount
@SimplyForAlexia Oh good now we are starting to get something more articulate. So if in you opinion exposure to mercury is not safe then there must be something else about this video you don't like besides the fact that is show without a doubt that all mercury fillings leak substantial amount of mercury.
I am still not clear exactly what your objection to this video is. At first you claimed I misrepresented the evidence and WHO FDA etc were co-conspirators. What now?
FYI there is a fake blogger @SimplyForAlexia on this forum and I just want to emphasize that I am open and willing to address each and every criticism of "Smoking Teeth" with anyone curious enough to ask.
You can tell that this is not a real person interested in the issue of mercury released from fillings because when repeatedly asked for specific complaints what I got was the conspiracy theory and the claim that the evidence was secret. Beware of fake bloggers they are being paid to deceive U.
@SimplyForAlexia Oh so that is the true story, you are afraid to disclose your secret evidence that mercury is safe. Can you hear me laughing? Come on you can make up a better story than that.
I suggest you go get another job as you're not very good as a FAKE blogger. I guess unemployment is pretty bad for fools and fakers. I hear they are hiring faker bloggers at the ADA and CDA.
Good news, FAKE Alexia is not going to show us her new secret evidence that mercury in the mouth leaking into saliva, jaw bone, brain, heart, kidney is safe for us all. I guess we'll have to stumble along in our old confused ways and continue thinking mercury is a deadly poison.
So sorry you won't share your secret information with the world, a moral obligation I might add.
@SimplyForAlexia No you are correct. You are entitled to your opinion. I am not saying you are not. What I am saying is that if you claim I am misrepresenting a single solitary fact in this video they it IS you obligation to disclose not your august opinion but the source of evidence that a fact was materially misrepresented. That is what I am in fact DEMANDING.
It was you who made the claim I was misrepresenting facts so all I am looking for is clarity on that issue.
It was you FAKE Alexia who made the claim I was misrepresenting facts so all I am looking for is a specific example on that issue. You claim to have secret evidence of safety. So what value is science if you keep this landmark evidence secret? Don't we all dissever to see this startling new evidence? If you have secret evidence I only wonder why you feel it is important to keep it secret?
You don't have a shred of evidence and thus your claim is evidence of misrepresentation
What can you be afraid of? You've got the same ability to type as I and you claim to even spell better so where are those well thought out examples of flaws in Smoking Teeth?
There are none BTW. The full length video is available for others to buy for personal use from the IAOMT or if you play it on public access TV I'll even format it to whatever format the TV station demands and send it free of charge to the station.
@SimplyForAlexia Perhaps you FAKE ALEXIA do not understand that this is a public forum and thus a private disclosure of your SECRET information is not permissible. If you've got something besides innuendo and denigration to say then let's have it, otherwise it is you who should shut off your computer.
Did you go watch "Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings" yet?
Why show it to others? Apparently you've forgotten the Hippocratic oath which among other admonitions says you should make known to all others (especially who ask) the results of your personal discoveries.
This is really big news. Secret evidence that all our efforts and UN treaties to stop the spread of mercury into ecosystems is needless because we've got secret evidence of safety. LOL.
@SimplyForAlexia Drowning you out? Quite the contrary FAKE Alexia, I demand that you respond to my request for documentation of a single solitary flaw in the entire video. I stand solidly behind my ethical and moral obligation to tell the truth a policy you are obviously not familiar with. By watching the video you can see the exact time-line so just watch it again and then send the science to refute the errors you allege.
Ignorance is evident when people misuse the language and spew ludicrous "facts." If you have ever had any experience with mercury, even in a high school lab, you should know that the vapors are extremely dangerous and have an accumulative effect. You can't even feed cats tuna fish that humans eat because they get mercury poison. You need to get an education before you really harm yourself.
@HallikGreymane FYI the FDA has set the max mercury level for fish at 1 part per million.
When the researchers at the University of Calgary Medical School installed amalgam fillings in monkeys fed a soft diet after 12 weeks their bowels were so full mercury that the stool was over 1 ppm mercury and much of it methyl mercury.
@SimplyForAlexia Conspiracy by WHO, FDA, EPA, IAOMT and probably a few others who do not see the world the way you do is that right?
So if I misrepresented a single syllable of research you'd be able to tell me what that error was. Since I see nothing but silence I repeat beware Alexia is a hired FAKE blogger.
This is merely an attempt to discredit respected scientists and peer reviewed evidence because they have nothing else they can do. They have no science only money and political influence
@SimplyForAlexia While you facetiously claim I am lining my pockets you are the one who is being paid to deceive. I get nothing from my videos and donate 100% of the profits from sales to non-profits charities.
You are lying right now when you claim you've got good evidence. Show it to me NOW!
Go watch real experts discuss the evidence HERE: Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings.
@SimplyForAlexia I am waiting for your evidence that there is a flaw in the volumes of research I cited in making this video.
You don't have any and thus your remarks are totally designed to deceive the public. Shame on you for this dastardly deed. Stop telling the big myth that time-release mercury fillings deceptively called silver can be implanted in the mouth of anyone without exposing that person and the dental staff to enormous amounts of mercury.
@SimplyForAlexia The problem with this SimplyForAlexia post is it is fake.
Not only do I cite the relevant peer reviewed scientific experiments upon which this video is based you will undoubtedly note that Alexia cites none whatsoever. So can rhetoric trump science? Absolutely if the people are uneducated and the forces of evil of which Alexia is a big part are vociferous enough. On the other hand I personally think that is is past time for punishment of the lying mercury-implant perpetrators.
@Mythodiir But then again most of us do not like inhaling exhaust fumes and thanks to the efforts of the Green movement our automobiles today are soooo much cleaner than when I was 14. I remember when driving in LA the smog was so bad I had to get off the freeway and go to a bathroom and wash my eyes.
The big difference I see between smoking and exhaust is you suck on the cigarette and it primarily affects you but exhaust affects everyone.
And apparently smoking will reduce cognitive functions too;-)
Mike Ziff pointed out that cigarette smoking greatly increased the mercury vapors coming off fillings. Paranandi recently showed that mercury caused the permeability in arteries that is believed to be the root cause of atherosclerosis so perhaps the fact that they cannot tell the difference between smoking and smoking teeth is indicative of this phenomena?
@chars414 No but you do get neurological impairment and a whole host of diseases. In fact an excellent book "The Missing Link" by Michael Ziff connected smoking of cigarettes to the release of mercury from teeth. The mercury from fillings is linked to the perforation of the arteries which allows the cholesterol to build up in between the layers and cause atherosclerosis.
Sadly Mike also smoked and died of an aneurysm another vascular disorder linked to mercury and smoking.
@allenrobinson2012 Im so sad, Dental crap between these silver fillings and flouride? SO many illness over the years from CFS to thyriod, all in the name of what? We cant even protect our loved ones cuz BIG EFFING BROTHER is failing us.. BIG TIME Im sick to death of this.. they will get theirs but NOT SOON ENOUGH FOR ME!
@allenrobinson2012 No, on the contrary. I loled because of the need some folk really need the obvious pointed out to them. It's incredibly stupid to think gas layers by atomic weight.
@cheshirecatalyst62 By reviewing either "It really Is Mercury" or watching "The beautiful Truth (excerpts)" where an instrument calibrated to only measure mercury is used to verify the level seen and in addition review Atomic absorption on Wikipedia so that you can understand the physics that when we are using a 253.7 nm light as in the demonstration it only shows mercury.
Boyle's law and gay-Lussacs have nothing to do with a solid material such as amalgam. Hot air does rise and can carry small particles, until it diffuses(ironically, Boyle's Law) I've never seen something so full of *&$%, yea we'll cure ya for 14.95 plus S+H.Sure there's mercury in the air about one part per 750 billion. Btw amalgams have elemental mercury not methylmercury....
@coldblue31 The mercury you can see rising either in this video or if you prefer to watch it falling in "The Beautiful Truth" since we did not heat up that old amalgam, is a gas and not particulate. Therefore it will obey the laws of gasses.
In a recent risk assessment of dental personnel exposure to mercury Richardson calculated that their greatest risk was from respirable particles of amalgam.
I have nothing for sale but dentists are deceptively selling mercury while calling it silver.
THANKS 4 THIS VIDEO & RESEARCH!
I have SUFFERED, & still am, from mercury amalgam toxicity for over a quarter of a century. I was led to the path of Biological Dentistry through Hal Huggins & there began becoming EDUCATED about these dental NIGHTMARES & my health, starting in my mouth. I had all my heinous amalgams removed from my mouth properly; teeth extracted; & currently have mercury embedded in 3 quadrants of my mouth. I still have LOTS to do & am pissed how this has wreaked in my life & $!
70sCher 15 hours ago
@70sCher I do sympathize with you and thank goodness you found out about the dirty little secret that "silver" fillings are really quicksilver fillings. You are not alone in your pain.
The problem continues as government agencies who are being paid to protect employees OSHA, the environment EPA and regulate implants to require definitive evidence of safety FDA have abdicated their responsibilities to the trade association ADA that trains dentists and advocates mercury for the poor.
davidkennedydds 2 hours ago
Well you guys let your cavities get larger until you have no teeth and can no longer eat, and I'll have all my cavities filled, and we will see who lives longer. :D
BisMadeThis 1 day ago
@BisMadeThis
Focus here for a moment. This is not about tooth decay. It is about fraud and deceptive marketing of mercury as silver. Never once telling the public that mercury from mercury/silver dental fillings is BY FAR the largest source of human exposure to mercury.
Dentists careless disregard for OSHA safe handling also accounts for a substantial percentage of environmental damage. Every day hundreds of women employees in dental offices are rendered infertile. That's a crime
davidkennedydds 2 hours ago
Look up smoking tooth on Google. Read the Quackbuster article. This guy has a good point, water vapor would also be visible in front if this screen and would rise, whereas mercury vapor would sink.Didn't he say the tooth was dipped in warm water? (1:12-1:14)
BenAndSandraEvans 5 days ago
@BenAndSandraEvans Not correct though because we've totally refuted this facetious claim by self-appointed experts who ignore the laws of physics and if you'd bothered to look at even one of the several video responses you'd see PURE LIQUID MERCURY rising from a bowl looking just exactly like the Smoking Tooth. (You do recall that hot air rises?) In others vids we use alternative means of measuring the mercury. Or you can read a detailed analysis of the laws of physics IAOMT
davidkennedydds 5 days ago
@BenAndSandraEvans Yes we raised the temperature of that demonstration with warm water then dried the tooth. However, even if water were present, it is not, water vapor is not visible under 253.7 nm light. Then he scraped a dry with a knife and it again spewed. Then he rubbed the filling with a pencil eraser.
To date every scientist who has MEASURED the amount of mercury that leaks from so called "Silver" fillings has found lots. World Health Organization Hg Criteria 118.
davidkennedydds 5 days ago
@davidkennedydds Okay, Okay. It's dangerous. I get that. I did check out the other videos, and by no means want to discourage people from removing deadly substances from their body. At the same time, is it not a good idea to check out the details until one understands instead of just going along with a common conception? So continue to investigate I will. Quick question... Why is the mercury vapor visible in front of the blue light on 1:56 - 1:58? That's not uv 253.7 nm is it?
BenAndSandraEvans 5 days ago
Comment removed
VelvetyThornz 6 days ago
am not sure what to do , I have one old amalgam filling, I want it removed but then Composite fillings are made of glass quartz mixed with resin. They are applied to the tooth in layers and cured with light or chemicals which cause also health problems . Porcelain fillings are sculpted based on a picture of your tooth and then cemented with dental glue. and did research it does hormonal balance, chemical imbalances, am fuck either way .
alohastar 3 weeks ago
@alohastar No you're not in too much trouble I don't think. Composites do not necessarily leak any estrogen mimics so select one that doesn't or like you said use a cad-cam porcelain or fully cured resin filling. I did primarily indirect composite inlays if the filling was big.
If you check with the FDA there are zero adverse reports on composite releasing hormones and if you want to watch dozens of people blast the FDA hearing see then on You Tube like my vid "Got Mercury".
davidkennedydds 3 weeks ago
@davidkennedydds UGH can we trust those FDA bastards? really?
presouz 1 week ago
@presouz Just about as far as you can throw them.
davidkennedydds 1 week ago
@alohastar Sue "Unca Keith" from MN! You'll do a favor to all mankind !!!
TheOwlDaddy 1 week ago
Mercury fillings were started in the US by two French men Cracour brothers who called these toxic plugs ROYAL MINERAL SEGUNDUM. With emphasis on the dumb. They dared not call them mercury because everyone knows mercury is a deadly poison and calling them what they are is bad for business.
Today US dental students are admonished to never call them mercury. Always deny that they are linked to any medical disorder and lie to their patients. it is totally unethical and yet still going on.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago 8
@davidkennedydds Why is it used? What was the original reason for choosing mercury to use? Do you know? And why is it still used? Is there some property it has that makes it somehow ideal for these purposes?? Or is it just total nefarious, shitty evil reasons for them doing this.
thatstheguy07 1 month ago
What is the BS reasoning to begin with in using mercury in these fillings?? Ive always wondered that.
thatstheguy07 1 month ago
@thatstheguy07 Mercury is used to bond the metals together.
kennyoliu 1 month ago
@kennyoliu Ahh. I see.
thatstheguy07 1 month ago
Is N-Acetyl-Cysteine an effective chelator?
dialectical44 1 month ago
@dialectical44 I've not spent a lot of time examining that product but I have heard som opinions that might make you somewhat cautious about taking it without supervision. It does seem to get the mercury moving but then that might be a problem rather than a benefit. The best thing to suck mercury up like a sponge is N1, N3-bis (2-mercaptoethyl)-isothalamide OSR which unfortunately is not available at this time. It took my mercury to zero in 6 months.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago
Comment removed
dialectical44 1 month ago
@davidkennedydds
(edited)
So NAC only mobilizes mercury and doesn't remove it through the urine? It is a precursor of Glutathione production. Sulfhydral.compounds are crucial to celluar health and Gluutatione production
dialectical44 1 month ago
@dialectical44 Some does exit the urine but typically you do not want to expose kidneys to mercury as it harms them. Mercury was used as a diuretic for many years and thus we have extensive evidence of how sensitive kidneys are to mercury. Any chelator properly designed would do what glutathione does and exit through the bowel.
You are correct NAC is one of the building blocks of glutathione but you body has to make it in order to benefit. Swallowing glutathione is of no benefit.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago
@davidkennedydds
N-Acetyl Cysteine is rapidly metabolized to intracellular glutathione. Glutathione supplements are not the same as NAC.
dialectical44 1 month ago
@dialectical44 Yes that is correct it can be. Yet the fundamental problem is raising intracellular glutathione. I've not seen any study yet showing NAC supplementation does that effectively. It is very difficult to do if the person continues to be exposed to elements that exhausts their intracellular glutathione.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davidkennedydds
N-Acetyl Cysteine is rapidly metabolized to intracellular glutathione. Glutathione supplements are not the same as NAC
dialectical44 1 month ago
@davidkennedydds i am using detoxified chlorine dioxide,alternating with calcium hypochlorite (CAP),with 16 oz of water(orally ingested)=hypochlorous acid- .the relief is almost instantionous and lasts for several hours but its temporary,but i need to get my mercury crowns removed.as it is i am screwed by the effects of these amalgams/chronic candida.
SHARKREEF2011 2 weeks ago
@dialectical44, there's Humet-R - humet(dot)com - 100% safe and very mild. Click "Humet-R", then "Humet-R" to buy. No guarantee it will clear mercury from the brain (according to a medical book, no chelator does), but it may.
threethreetwothree33 1 month ago
@dialectical44, or, rather, the medical book said it hasn't been shown that chelation can remove mercury from the brain, but some products may.
threethreetwothree33 1 month ago
@threethreetwothree33 Removing mercury from where it is attached to the high sulfur tissues of the brain is very difficult. I know of only one substance that does this effectively N1, N3-bis (2-mercaptoethyl)-isothalamide which is not currently available. People who took this recovered from tremors and neurological impairment indicating to me that the product at least attenuated the mercury.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago
@davidkennedydds, I've heard that some products can be dangerous as they dislodge mercury and it can end up elsewhere. Humet-R merely helps flush out mercury your body is trying to remove - so not like the product you mentioned.
Strange how governments are happy to 'saturate' the environment with mercury (latest article says mercury enters the soil through rainfall, which then gets into our food) - but do nothing to advise people on removing mercury from their bodies - no surprise really!
threethreetwothree33 1 month ago
This is true and all who say its not dangerous are completely ignorant. I'm living proof of this. I was crazy, suicidal, tired, forgetfully, foggy minded, emotional, outburst of rage, lazy ( but knew I wasn't really), I was loosing my mind. I had just 3 removed, still have two to go. I felt instantly better after the removal of 3, like I had woke up from a bad dream. I feel like I have my life back. Amalgams are from hell and the Nazi ADA needs to be punished for crimes against humanity!
SelflessEmpire 2 months ago 22
Thank you for sharing how mercury has so dramatically impacted your life. I can tell that since you go better so fast you were not over exposed during the removal. This is very important as all of your symptoms indicated you were very much on the edge of the threshold.
Unfortunately for many is that after going over the threshold coming back is not easy and not always possible. A step in the wrong direction off the construction elevator at the top floor, a step back is too late.
davidkennedydds 2 months ago
@SelflessEmpire Dear Selfless, Please go post your message on this web site devoted to publicizing the stories of how mercury has caused injury.
mercuryexposure.info/consumers/injured-consumers
davidkennedydds 2 months ago
@SelflessEmpire There are a few reasons you are wrong. The body cannot remove metals from itself. That's why heavy metal poisoning must be treated with chelation therapy. Removing the fillings would have no effect on any metal already absorbed into your body. If the metals were making you crazy, like you claim, removing the fillings would do absolutely nothing. The fact that you "felt instantly better" shows that it could not possibly be metal poisoning, and almost certainly psychosomatic.
altoidyoda 1 month ago
@altoidyoda WRONG.removing a daily source of toxic mercury vapor asorbed into the lungs,DAILY,would have a tremendous effect on your body/mind.
your comment proves the old adage,"a little knowledge is a dangerous thing"
moron.
SHARKREEF2011 2 weeks ago
@SelflessEmpire As to the legitimacy of this video, there is an easy way to disprove the claim that we are seeing mercury vapor. Mercury vapor is heavier than air. The smoke we see in this video is rising. Mercury vapor does not rise in air, it sinks, like CO2 vapor from dry ice. There is nothing in fillings that would produce rising vapor. Check your periodic table, you can double-check the atomic weights. The tooth was dipped in water, and what we see here is water vapor.
altoidyoda 1 month ago
@altoidyoda whether you believe the video to be legitimate is irrelevant. Its now proven that it releases mercury continuously throughout the life of the filling with or without the video.
TheJDorian 1 month ago
@TheJDorian
Consequently mercury from amalgam is by far the predominant source of human exposure to mercury.
So why are they regulating coal fired power plants when in fact the dentist is the culprit?
davidkennedydds 3 weeks ago
@SelflessEmpire I just woke up after a 24 year long bad dream.
My body is loving me! GET THEM OUT NOW!
vancouverislandbass 2 weeks ago
That's it? I go on vacation and the posting stops??? Come on people, entertain me with your "I read it on the internet, so it must be true!" mentality....
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
From Cabo San Lucas I can tell you're in need of some time away from the chair to clear your head.
When you get back please tell me why you are not a criminal because you obviously are not in compliance with the employee protections of OSHA. One plausible explanation is you have no employees. I can think of no other.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds You don't know anything about me, or really anything else for that matter. Are you vacationing in Cabo with all the money you scammed from poor desperate people that you were trying to "cure"?
You are the criminal, "doctor".
TheHgDDS 3 months ago 4
@TheHgDDS Since I am not in practice that I guess makes you the criminal implanting time-release mercury tooth plugs in unsuspecting people while claiming they are safe without a shadow of evidence to support the claims.
I see many legal charges in your future perhaps including negligent misrepresentation, toxic tort for injury, inadequate informed consent, failure to comply with environmental protections and Occupational protections.
davidkennedydds 1 month ago
@TheHgDDS I do know all about you and I know you pack mercury in peoples teeth while telling them it is perfectly safe. Liar liar pants on fire. I don't charge anyone for anything so it is YOU who are the one who preys on poor people taking money for Mercury while claiming your selling silver.
I repeat, "All mercury fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury." WHO Mercury Criteria Document 118 Average person receives 17µg/day from 12 fillings.
davidkennedydds 2 weeks ago
From the Spanish Version of Smoking Teeth:
if you had not used animals in your investigation referred here, I would share this video with more people.....I have all of my back teeth with amalgams and I have had two really bad crisis, and when I say bad I mean seriously bad....this is very dangerous........I say NO to the use of animals in this investigation, this is all too bad to make it worse. Regards.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds My reply:
Animals were used to by Vimy Lorscheider in order to prove beyond doubt that radioactive mercury exists fillings rapidly and deposits in critical organs. Had the dentists responded this tragedy would have ceased.
Instead the advocates for time-release mercury fillings implanted 250 orphans in Casa Pia Portugal with mercury without informed consent in a poorly designed study that combined all data to claim this horribly unethical experiment proved amalgam safe. (More)
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds (more)
In fact, when the data is appropriately analyzed so those with no fillings, then a few fillings are compared with those who have more amalgam fillings a clear definitive dose dependent indicator of systemic injury “A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children’s dental amalgam trial (2010) “ is shown.
Yes we used animals but the dentist poisoned orphan children. Your choice?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Your response is decidedly different than the 500000 others and if you go read the hundreds of questions I've answered you'll see a pattern I think of only dentists having trouble understanding the video.
Google Stacy Case of fox News Memphis and see how watching this video save her from MS. She went and got her amalgams safely removed and now she can not only walk again but dance as well. Her children will have a Mom to look after them and it almost didn't happened.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 And no SAFE LEVEL of mercury has been found according to both the EPA and WHO so when dentists claim the exposure to amalgam mercury is safe then ask what level do they consider safe and be sure they give you a reference.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Hence avoid BPA.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 You do have the right to legitimate accuract informed consent prior to any treatment.
Calling a mercury filling a "Silver" amalgam is a deceptive business practice that is taught in the institutions where dental students are indoctrinated with the garbage that the ADA says passes for science.
This is criminal in my opinion and should be addressed immediately by every state attorney general. Use Yellow Pages to see who advertises Silver Filling and file the complaint today.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 All studies to date have found minimal BPA from many brands of BisGMA composites and none from others so this issue is easily resolved by merely NOT using the kind that has a potential for BPA. On the other hand there is no brand of amalgam that does not release copious amounts of mercury. The new high copper ones leak as much as 14 times some older brands. Seems the increase in prostate more closely parallels the use of copper in dental amalgam.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Ummm, yeah. I keep telling you, I don't place amalgams. If I keep posting that, will you eventually read it. And maybe accept that maybe, just maybe, I actually don't place amalgams. I only go on this board to have fun at Kennedy's expense. I'm not pro or anti amalgam. I just don't place amalgams. Oh, one other thing. I don't place amalgams, either. You know I keep saying amalgam, and you keep saying mercury filling. Just in case I'm getting you mixed up. Same thing
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Now you're making sense. Kennedy argues that there is no middle ground. And his crappy video is NOT hard evidence. You're ok allenrobinson2012, just don't call me a criminal again. I'm not one of the bad guys like Kennedy.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS Hmmm, lets see if you are or are not a criminal guilty of abusing the trust of your employees. As you know I raised the issue of whether or not your practice is mercury-safe and compliant with the laws of this nation.
OSHA spells out exactly how when and where you may expose employees and sets the requirements for doing so.
DO YOU HAVE RECORDS OF MONITORING YOUR EMPLOYEES, TRAINING, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, WORK PRACTICES AND ENGINEERING CONTROLS?
No records then you're a criminal.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS In the video after the short demonstration I cite evidence that mercury exists amalgam fillings in sheep and monkeys and distributes widely. The kidneys of the sheep lost 60% of their ability to clear inulin. Pathophysiology is evidence of harm.
DeRoo reported in a study involving 1,336 infants born in Norway during a 7-year period, women who had mercury fillings placed in the first or second month of pregnancy had roughly quadrupled odds of giving birth to an infant with cleft palate
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS So now you've resorted to character assassination. Well I should expect as much from a criminal who exposes his/her patients and employees to mercury without any regard for their health or the law.
NOTE TO DENTAL EMPLOYEES: GO WATCH "POISON IN YOUR DENTISTS OFFICE" and then file anonymous complaints with OSHA to get it cleaned up and your reproductive health protected.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds OSHA Citation No. 1 alleges serious violations of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.850(e)
1a. For failing to conduct mercury exposure monitoring; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134(d)(1)(iii)
1b. For failing to evaluate the mercury exposure for the housekeeping and laundry service employees; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134(f)(2)
2a. For failing to perform annual respirator FIT testing; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134(h)(1)(i)
2b. For failing to require employees to use clean respirators; 29 C.F.R. § 1926.21(b)(2)
davidkennedydds 2 months ago
@davidkennedydds 3a. for failing to train employees in appropriate hygiene and work practice controls; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii)
3b. for failing to advise affected employees of the signs and symptoms of mercury exposure; 29 C.F.R. § 1926.50(a)
4. for failing to provide medical intervention and assessment to employees exposed to mercury; 29 C.F.R. § 1926.51(i)
5. for failing to maintain separate change rooms to prevent contamination; 29C.F.R. § 1926.55(a)
davidkennedydds 2 months ago
@davidkennedydds
6a. For exposing an employee above the threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.1 milligrams per cubic meter mg/m3 of mercury; 29 C.F.R. § 1926.55(b)
6b. For failing to implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to reduce an employee’s exposure to mercury; and 29 C.F.R. § 1926.95(a)
7. For providing coveralls which were not impervious to mercury. The serious citation proposes total penalties of $27,500.00.
THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EMPLOYEE PROTECTION.
davidkennedydds 2 months ago
@allenrobinson2012
I can see you just want to make shit up and then decry the shit you made up.
You don't have to remove amalgams. You may like exposure to mercury. You may like having cancer.
But what if you don't like mercury or cancer? Then as individuals we get to make our own decisions.
But what has to stop are the lies that dentists spew about how safe mercury is that distort the facts. They have to protect their staff and stop poisoning their patients and the environment with mercury
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Lets not get the apples confused with the oranges shall we. Smoking Teeth is HARD evidence. As hard as evidence can get in fact. You see elemental mercury vapor coming from a 25 year-old amalgam filling and the story goes on to cite numerous peer reviewed scientific studies that found exactly the same thing using various methods and conditions. Doesn't get much harder than that.
To blog about Dr. Godfrey's lecture I suggest we go there as that topic is related to that video.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 This is a statement of fact the fundamental foundation of observational evidence. I can state a simple fact and not expect someone extrapolate to the global. In debate this is called the Strawman argument. You set up a factitious argument so you can defeat it in debating. It is a well recognized ploy of the disinformation machine that sadly is often enough to convince the less well educated.
It is not a valid debating technique and will likely cost you points with the judges
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 BPA is absolutely a valid dental issue and one that needs some careful research as we don't need to throw the baby out with the wash. FYI all composites do not contain Bis-GMA a close relative of BPA. Bid-GMA apparently does not have the same estrogenic capacity as BPA but nevertheless should be looked at very carefully I agree.
However as a dentist I can tell you that it was having a sealant I can bond to enamel eliminated any need for mercury as a filling.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012
Go watch my video "Poison in Your Dentists Office" and see if you cannot think of a way that you may have an impact and at the same time protect some unsuspecting employee as well. We have laws about occupational exposure that basically make the dentist guilty until proven innocent if they do not have complete written records of routine daily office monitoring and measured levels of mercury vapor.
No records? They are guilty. So lets enforce that to end this sad story.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Sadly like you I feel Bradley's troubles are out of my hands but you are dead wrong that you cannot do something about the mercury issue.
In fact you can join DAMS and begin to show up, write letters, blog and even more you can identify people you know who work in dental offices that use mercury and encourage them to file anonymous complaints with OSHA over workplace safety. The dentist cannot legally open mixed dental amalgam so lets have some law enforcement.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 I think you must very a very confused person to think that showing a remarkable story is in anyway reflective of my credibility. If you believe that knowledge comes from evidence and that observation is a fundamental tool of science that you will wish to reflect for some time on Dr. Godfrey's clearly explained and documented observation. If not then please prepare a video of your own that documents some remarkable event that the whole world would like to see.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 If you think the lecture was presented as PROOF then I suggest you go watch it again as your are definitely confused about the content.
What you watched is merely a lecture. Nothing more and nothing less. The fact that no one else can show you anything even remotely like this should be of interest to anyone researching the conditions that produce cancer. It certainly got my attention.
Now go watch Rooted and see if you think keeping dead teeth is a good idea.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 "I'm not qualified to discuss the safety of the fillings I use, but dental bodies say it's safe, and that's why I use it". Ok. that's fair. EXCEPT I DON'T USE IT!!! Jesus tapdancing Christ. Are you deaf (or blind, asthere is no soundhere). I don't place amalgams. And I dont pooh pooh the research, just the dickheads that tell you they will cure your MS, etc, by taking out your amalgams. Those are thecriminals. They're the thieves and liars.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 ok, wait a second. Did I put an amalgam in your mouth? Seriously? I told you -- I don't use amalgam. Is your name Marvin? "Having a degrees doesn't make you a scientist"? Ok, and having a computer doesn't mean anything you post is credible. By how I write... Screw you stupid.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012
Allen can you clarify for me what your attitude about implanted time release mercury fillings is?
Seems you decry an estrogen mimic but have not addressed the hormone disrupting effects of mercury a proven consequence of occupational exposure in dentists.
I don't like either mercury or BPA being implanted without evidence of safety. That is my position. It is the responsibility and law for the manufacturers to furnish definitive evidence of safety before approval.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012
I am not defending BPA. Don't like it. Don't use it. Avoid it. And recommend a ban.
But the fundamental question is what have you done specifically to expand the body of research on BPA leaking from in situ composite fillings?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Yes just one case but what you cannot see in a 3 minute clip is a 2 hour discussion with extensive Q&A. All research begins with a theory and then observation. What I am showing is an observable outcome based upon the theory that interventions in the oral cavity may have produced the injury (cancer) and that removal of the insult may help resolve the injury. Dr. Godfrey also intervened with IV Vitamin C and homeopathic. This is way beyond my area of expertise but interesting
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Correction, Dr. Godfrey was speaking not only about mercury but root canals. The point is that no one I know can do anything like this with breast cancer. So if one resolved then why aren't there studies funded to assess early breast cancer detection with Thermogram and how these condition can or cannot be resolved with interventions.
We don't do that kind of research because ti might show what is causal for this common problem and thus no one is looking at stopping cancer
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 No actually I do agree that baby bottles and the little sucky things every mom sticks in the baby';s mouth should not contain BPA either. We are on the same page here. Just take it out.
By "David Kennedy under a different name" do you mean the David Kennedy who hasn't apparently paid his student loans that I get call on every day or so? David if you're listening pay the dam bill! I am tired of getting calls from collectors for your debt.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 The IAOMT is well aware of the BPA issue and to bring the focus of science on that issue we have on more than one occasion funded research into how much BPA is released from composite fillings. In addition on our website you can see a risk assessment on the other components of composite as well.
Although the sample was small and we are in the process of expanding the database with further testing the preliminary results are reassuring for the majority of brands of composite.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Allen you've got the exact answer to why this issue has gone on for almost 100 years. Dentists have virtually no training in toxicology and thus make toxicological blunders daily. The IAOMT was formed to try and correct this deficiency and so far we've only scratched the surface. if you know a dentist who would like to understand the impact of dental materials on health and well being please send them to the next IAOMT meeting. Help number of educated dentists keep growing.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Ummmm, I didn't see a real question. Unless it was "are you a dentist?" You don't even know me. How do you know I'm not a scientist? And it's Doctor Dentist to you, assface. When did I charge you for shit advice? And I'm not a criminal. Amalgam is legal. Go ahead and check. It is. But I DON'T USE AMALGAM!!!!! I thought theHgDDS was a funny name. Like Turd Fergusen. That's a funny name. You are stupid, and should keep listening to morons on message boards.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 I'd say he sounds more mercury poisoned than anything else. See how he dodges every specific question like for example whether or not he is compliant with the OSHA laws of this country requiring employee protections?
Mercury causes the inability think. It seems to be more the problem that anything else. Just imagine what fun the prosecuting attorney will have with his posts when one of his/her injured employees sues.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Question: How does one who has multiple degrees and spent years in academia go about pretending to be a scientist in your opinion?
Could it just be you do not like all the research that is cited in this brief documentary that is the issue rather than a pretense of some academic knowledge of toxicology?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
And just like that......poof, no more fun.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS I can see why you are running. Poof!
Better erase your handle too.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
This is a load of shit. The smokey plume can't be mercury, as mercury is heavier than air and will fall to the ground, not rise up.
MisterBadLuck 3 months ago
@MisterBadLuck FYI Hot gas rises. That is why Chinese coal fired power plants are polluting the streams in the Rocky Mountains.
Because of this never ending inaccurate criticism the next time Dr. Eichman demonstrated this for filmmaker Steve Kroschel "The Beautiful Truth" I asked that he not use heat. Instead he used a pocket knife and it floated gently toward the floor. Be sure to notice the truly enormous amounts of mercury that spew when a new filling is mixed well above OSHA's ceiling limit
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia
IN SUMMARY:
We make no diagnosis or claims of recovery.
We've demonstrated enormous exposure from mercury fillings in humans, monkeys and sheep.
We've called for a halt in all placement.
We've called for honest informed consent. They are not silver as mercury is the primary ingredient.
We've called full employee OSHA approved protections.
And that you stop the lies. Tell the truth now. You have mercury fillings yourself don't you?
Well no wonder Faker;-)
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Perhaps you'd better go watch Smoking Teeth again because you seem to have forgotten soooo much. Mercury must have addled your feeble brain.
Conclusion: It is the opinion of this academy that responsible government agencies should prohibit the
use of these fillings until such time as their manufacturers produce the alleged evidence
of safety.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Actually that is a big fat lie. Virtually all research that measured mercury coming off amalgams has found an enormous amount. Did you go watch Dr. Richardson "Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings" like I asked? Then you would undoubtedly noticed the graph of all the recent studies showing how much over the scientifically derived minimum risk level (MRL) for exposure to mercury. Some showing many times the MRL.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Ah! yes from us. Who exactly is us?
Are you with the FDA?
If so then you should comply with existing laws and classify any substance implanted into a natural or man-made body cavity as Class III and require the manufacture to furnish proof of safety.
What does it cost to fix teeth with bio-compatible materials? Actually much less than destroying the teeth and brains with mercury releasing ones for sure.
With no proof of safety you should stop putting in mercury fillings.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology is extremely concerned
about the anecdotal claims of safety by manufacturers and dental trade associations that
are at variance with the published peer-reviewed scientific evidence to the contrary.
The Precautionary Principal requires action once the possibility of harm exists. It does not require proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that in the case of heavy metal and xenobiotic exposure is both nearly impossible unnecessa
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia The video presentation titled Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas highlights more than a decade
of scientific research funded by the IAOMT that is the basis for our statement of concern regarding the amount of mercury leaking from set silver amalgam fillings.
Voice Over:
All mercury/silver fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury constantly. The amount increases with any kind of stimulation and as a result, mercury from fillings produces the majority of human exposure to mercury.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia I'll let the documentation speak for itself. Scientific evidence is the path to truth.
All mercury fillings leak substantial amounts of mercury and as a result mercury from amalgam is by far the predominant source of human exposure to mercury WHO CD 118. Mercury is now linked to Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Low birth-weight babies, Autism, ALS, MS, IDCM, and hear disease. Where do it come from?
I can't wait to hear the guilty party squeal when they sit before the jury;-)
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Yah sure. I am the problem and not the implanting of mercury inn millions of teeth while calling it silver. Keep up the fake blogging. It is amusing.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Your actions speak loudly about your dishonorable, unethical, nefarious intentions.
You are doing your level best (not very well I might add) to deceive those reading this blog. You claim without evidence to have a secret body of information that will prove implanting time-release mercury fillings are safe yet whenever this issue has a thorough examination of the available evidence it is clearly shown to be unsafe. Unsafe because mercury amalgam makes blood mercury go way UP.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia I did? Please explain where you saw this all inclusive diagnosis? Expect once again No response because this is a made up claim.
What I said was clearly mercury fillings cause EXPOSURE. Whether or not an individual becomes poisoned is another question that involves such nuances as concurrent exposure to lead, Apolipoprotein E, selenium and a host of other factors. Diagnose of a disorder is not my desire or intent.
We've proved substantial mercury exposure and that is enough.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
So how can you tell @SimplyForAlexia is Fake? First check out his/her channel. No personal information, 55 views and a stolen track of music. This is typical of FAKE bloggers. They set up a new name every few days and spew their deception trying to keep the lid on the mercury/silver filling crime-of-the-century.
Latest research (Kim 2011) has linked newborn baby's blood level of mercury to lower than the normal birth weight and lower weight 2 years later. That means a lifetime of problems.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds Kim et al. Mercury levels in maternal and cord blood and attained weight through the
24 months of life 2011.
Snapp showed way back in 1981 that after carefully removing all amalgam fillings the blood mercury level dropped 90%. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude then that since 1 out of 6 US babies are born with umbilical cord blood levels sufficient to cause brain damage that 90% of that damage is due to the use of mercury/silver amalgam tooth fillings.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds WARNING dentists use mercury during pregnancy. Snapp, Molin, Frykholm and others found that immediately after removing mercury/silver fillings the blood mercury went UP even if the teeth were pulled out!
So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby you must get all your mercury fillings out safely and carefully. To do that you have to plan at least 7 months and some say a year ahead then get the mother's blood mercury checked prior to becoming pregnant.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds You are insane. You MUST get all your amalgams removed???? By who, you? For how much. In one place on this board, you're saying it's more harmful to take them out because the blood level increases. Here you say you MUST have them removed to have a healthy baby. My wife has some old amalgams. My kids are fine. You're an idiot. How can you say shit like this to people
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS Any you've excelled in anger management too you say. Are you confused or what?
Please explain to me where you got the idea that I thought you should have some fool remove all your amalgams? Do you just make shit up and then spew? What I said was these mercury-leaking fillings should be banned and the advocates (Yourself) should be required to provide proof of safety and since they cannot do that they should:
A. Protect their employees
B. Protect their patients
It is the law u know.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds "So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby you must get all your mercury fillings out safely and carefully. To do that you have to plan at least 7 months and some say a year ahead then get the mother's blood mercury checked prior to becoming pregnant. " This is what you wrote 3 post above. Are you that stupid that you don't even realize what YOU posted?!? The first part of that says you must get your fillings out, doesn't it????
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS Actually it says you may get your fillings out before IF you want to maximize your chances of having a healthy intelligent cleft palate free child. DeRoo explained. “Among mothers who have amalgam fillings, the number of fillings they have correlates with mercury measured in cord blood and breast milk.”
When fillings placed in the first or second month of pregnancy very significant near quadrupling of the odds of giving birth to an infant with isolated cleft palate (odds ratio, 3.6)
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds NO. You wrote "you must remove your mercury fillings". That is what YOU wrote. I can see it on my monitor right now. Are you actually denying that you wrote it??? Maybe some dolt with a mouth full of amalgams snuck on your conputer and wrote it. You are effing dumb dumb dumb!
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS Now I know it is hard because you obviously have been sniffing a whole lot of mercury but please try to read the whole sentence before you spew. "So if you intend to get pregnant and wish to have a healthy baby" . . . were the two condition.
What if you don't care if the baby has an IQ above a snake? Then get a job working for some idiot dentist who willy nilly packs mercury in to everyone's teeth calling it silver and totally ignoring all of the occupational health and safety laws.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS The manufacturers say mercury/silver fillings are not for use in pregnant women and what if you do not know if she is pregnant? Germany, Austria recommend NO amalgams in young women regardless because they may become pregnant. What I think shows the insanity of this whole issue is the Devil-may-care attitude dentists display toward the pregnancy outcome of both their patients and their staff.
There is no doubt that both of these populations are currently being injured by Hg dentists.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds And I don't place amalgams. Not on prego's, kids or anyone. And not because your said it's not safe. It's because people like composites more. I'm a people person. I give em what they want.
You're so stupid.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS So you "Give'em what they want". . some might call that a whore but then that may be disrespectful of the oldest profession. But since you do drill out old mercury fillings and correct me if I am wrong but I'll wager without any employee or patients protections whatsoever you thuse create a bolus dose of mercury that will unquestionably impact a fetus.
Or do you also protect your patients "people person" because I can assure you without a doubt that is exactly "What they want"?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds You don't even know, the quality of work I do (certainly superior to yours), and you compare me to your mother, I mean, a whore. You are an ass. Actually, you're just stupid. You spit out references to studies that are biased and unscientific to make yourself sound smart, and then you can't even remember the drivel you posted.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS That anger management thing again. Now focus here. I know it is hard but I merely asked if you followed the Occupational Health and Safety Laws regarding mercury exposure that specifically state, "When it is reasonable to assume that exposure is likely the employer shall:
1. Provide informed consent
2. Protective Equipment
3. Institute Work Practices
4. Engineering Controls
5. Monitor the Workplace
6. Monitor the Employees
7. Keep records of all of the above for 30 years.
Do you?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds Sure, I monitor everything. And as soon as I see any of them getting Alz or MS, I'll make sure they go right to one of those IAOMT morons and he can offer her her false hopes....
I've only owned my office for 12 years, so I guess I'm guilty of the last one.
Say hello to your mother for me.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS So I take it from your off the wall response that you have not been measuring your office or staff and providing the equipment and protections required in all 50 state.
The interesting thing about mercury is that the delay in symptoms may be as much as 20 years hence the OSHA requirement for 30 years of records. When one of your staff files an unlawful exposure complaint with OSHA I don't think you will be quite so flippant when the inspectors arrive and your record book is empty.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
DeRoo (2010) “Among mothers who have amalgam fillings, the number of fillings they have correlates with mercury measured in cord blood and breast milk.”
Lederman (2008) Higher cord blood mercury was associated with reductions in developmental scores at 36 and 48 months, after adjusting for the positive effects of fish/seafood consumption during pregnancy.
Clearly The-Mercury-Packing Dentists' fillings are harming his/her patient's babies. FYI more mercury is bad for children. EPA says 1 in 6.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS u r mental.your amalgams are definatly making u insane.
angry
mad hatter syndrone
go snort some coke doc...
SHARKREEF2011 2 weeks ago
@SimplyForAlexia This is exactly the deception I warned you all about. Once again the FAKE blogger tries to deceive you into thinking you can see mercury vapor under 253.7 nm light. You cannot see anything but mercury with atomic absorbency. I would refer anyone interested in the detailed reference rebuttal to this idiotic argument to iaomt.blogspot.com.
So why would Faker blogger do that? Because seeing is believing and they do do not want you to see what mercury packing dentists are doing.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds Correction water vapor is not visible under 253.7 nm light.
Atomic Absorption (AA) is a very sound analytical method used widely in research and medicine. Most elements and compounds have a light signature and when you vaporize a variety of unknown substances through AA you can determine what it actually is. They used this on CSI if you were watching using hair.
Example: Napoleon's hair was unusually high in arsenic thus indicating he was possibly murdered by the British.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Oh but of course you did offend anyone who has taken the trouble to get a post graduate degree. The term doctor is not the same as physician which is what you meant. What I usually say is dentists can only poison their patients and after they have done that the patient has to call 911 or seek medical attention because dentists are not by license allowed to diagnose nor treat any of the disorders mercury fillings cause except of course dead and broken teeth.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
I really love it here.
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS
Me too;-)
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds I don't think we like it for the same reasons. I like the conflicts, how everyone's opinion is fact, etc. I respect that you have an opinion on this subject, however crazy I might find your opinion to be. And I respect that you think that if I place an amalgam in someone's head, I might destroy their life. Even if I think you're crazy for thinking that. Please keep entertaining me......
TheHgDDS 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS You are not my concern. The fact that you are willing to destroy someones life in order to make a buck is. My job is the same as a sign post. I merely provide information.
EPA found 1 out of 6 baby's blood is high in mercury.
Kim et al (2011) have shown this is verybad for the baby.
Snapp proved blood mercury was from amalgam.
MSDS say amalgam is not safe for women during pregnancy.
Who would defend you for assaulting a woman with mercury when the baby is harmed? Tell it to the jury.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS You mistake opinion for research findings. While it is true that research can reflect the opinions of the researcher it is equally true that the modern methods of blinding the data from the investigators provides some protection against such biases. Further the use of statistical methods to determine if the results are significant to the 95% level further protects and validates the findings.
What research do you posses showing infant exposure to mercury from amalgam is within the MRL?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@TheHgDDS you ar a fake shill for the ada.u actually are not a dentist,or scientist.if im wrong post your business address to prove u r who /what u say u r.where is your dental clinic that has been around for 12 years?
prove it.
i predict u will make up an excuse to not tell us your business name/address,because u r not what u say u r.
SHARKREEF2011 2 weeks ago
@SimplyForAlexia
Yaah! our secret evidence I've got to beg you to share with others. I just wonder what could have come over all those scientists at the University of Calgary Medical School publishing the results of their research for the whole world to see. Secret research is what we all need to push for and Alexia (rimes with dyslexia) will lead the way for us if we only trust her. LOL
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia So hear again the paid-FAKE-blogger decries my unwillingness to take her word-for-it that she has some secret information that she will not, has not, cannot share with us but insists we contact her directly. Her approach is the opposite of mine.
I put every thing up front and in the video. I even show you the copies of the actual peer reviewed scientific studies the IAOMT helped fund. What has she done except bellyache about my criticism and not having a blog of her own?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia You seem to have endless amounts fo time to blog on this video but did you ever once go ewatch
Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings
See the graph prepared by Dr. Richardson below the picture on the first page. As you can see every single study that measured human body burden or exposure to mercury found huge amounts coming from amalgam. The exception ADAs Mackert who did not measure but "Estimated" the amount
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Unreadable incoherent reply to what?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Oh good now we are starting to get something more articulate. So if in you opinion exposure to mercury is not safe then there must be something else about this video you don't like besides the fact that is show without a doubt that all mercury fillings leak substantial amount of mercury.
I am still not clear exactly what your objection to this video is. At first you claimed I misrepresented the evidence and WHO FDA etc were co-conspirators. What now?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
FYI there is a fake blogger @SimplyForAlexia on this forum and I just want to emphasize that I am open and willing to address each and every criticism of "Smoking Teeth" with anyone curious enough to ask.
You can tell that this is not a real person interested in the issue of mercury released from fillings because when repeatedly asked for specific complaints what I got was the conspiracy theory and the claim that the evidence was secret. Beware of fake bloggers they are being paid to deceive U.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Oh so that is the true story, you are afraid to disclose your secret evidence that mercury is safe. Can you hear me laughing? Come on you can make up a better story than that.
I suggest you go get another job as you're not very good as a FAKE blogger. I guess unemployment is pretty bad for fools and fakers. I hear they are hiring faker bloggers at the ADA and CDA.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia
Good news, FAKE Alexia is not going to show us her new secret evidence that mercury in the mouth leaking into saliva, jaw bone, brain, heart, kidney is safe for us all. I guess we'll have to stumble along in our old confused ways and continue thinking mercury is a deadly poison.
So sorry you won't share your secret information with the world, a moral obligation I might add.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia No you are correct. You are entitled to your opinion. I am not saying you are not. What I am saying is that if you claim I am misrepresenting a single solitary fact in this video they it IS you obligation to disclose not your august opinion but the source of evidence that a fact was materially misrepresented. That is what I am in fact DEMANDING.
It was you who made the claim I was misrepresenting facts so all I am looking for is clarity on that issue.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@davidkennedydds
It was you FAKE Alexia who made the claim I was misrepresenting facts so all I am looking for is a specific example on that issue. You claim to have secret evidence of safety. So what value is science if you keep this landmark evidence secret? Don't we all dissever to see this startling new evidence? If you have secret evidence I only wonder why you feel it is important to keep it secret?
You don't have a shred of evidence and thus your claim is evidence of misrepresentation
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia
What can you be afraid of? You've got the same ability to type as I and you claim to even spell better so where are those well thought out examples of flaws in Smoking Teeth?
There are none BTW. The full length video is available for others to buy for personal use from the IAOMT or if you play it on public access TV I'll even format it to whatever format the TV station demands and send it free of charge to the station.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Perhaps you FAKE ALEXIA do not understand that this is a public forum and thus a private disclosure of your SECRET information is not permissible. If you've got something besides innuendo and denigration to say then let's have it, otherwise it is you who should shut off your computer.
Did you go watch "Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings" yet?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Oh my bad. You've got secret proof.
Why show it to others? Apparently you've forgotten the Hippocratic oath which among other admonitions says you should make known to all others (especially who ask) the results of your personal discoveries.
This is really big news. Secret evidence that all our efforts and UN treaties to stop the spread of mercury into ecosystems is needless because we've got secret evidence of safety. LOL.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Drowning you out? Quite the contrary FAKE Alexia, I demand that you respond to my request for documentation of a single solitary flaw in the entire video. I stand solidly behind my ethical and moral obligation to tell the truth a policy you are obviously not familiar with. By watching the video you can see the exact time-line so just watch it again and then send the science to refute the errors you allege.
No reply = no errors. I am waiting.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
Ignorance is evident when people misuse the language and spew ludicrous "facts." If you have ever had any experience with mercury, even in a high school lab, you should know that the vapors are extremely dangerous and have an accumulative effect. You can't even feed cats tuna fish that humans eat because they get mercury poison. You need to get an education before you really harm yourself.
HallikGreymane 3 months ago
@HallikGreymane FYI the FDA has set the max mercury level for fish at 1 part per million.
When the researchers at the University of Calgary Medical School installed amalgam fillings in monkeys fed a soft diet after 12 weeks their bowels were so full mercury that the stool was over 1 ppm mercury and much of it methyl mercury.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Blah blah blah, so where exactly did you find a flaw?
I hear only Silence. When specifics are demanded all you get is lots of vitriol, name calling, innuendo and pejorative terms from the FAKE blogger.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia Conspiracy by WHO, FDA, EPA, IAOMT and probably a few others who do not see the world the way you do is that right?
So if I misrepresented a single syllable of research you'd be able to tell me what that error was. Since I see nothing but silence I repeat beware Alexia is a hired FAKE blogger.
This is merely an attempt to discredit respected scientists and peer reviewed evidence because they have nothing else they can do. They have no science only money and political influence
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia
I demand that you show me your evidence or stop lying. You do NOT have any evidence that exposure to mercury is without harm.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia While you facetiously claim I am lining my pockets you are the one who is being paid to deceive. I get nothing from my videos and donate 100% of the profits from sales to non-profits charities.
You are lying right now when you claim you've got good evidence. Show it to me NOW!
Go watch real experts discuss the evidence HERE: Amalgam Risk Assessment finds 120 million Americans over daily safe dose of mercury from amalgam fillings.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia I am waiting for your evidence that there is a flaw in the volumes of research I cited in making this video.
You don't have any and thus your remarks are totally designed to deceive the public. Shame on you for this dastardly deed. Stop telling the big myth that time-release mercury fillings deceptively called silver can be implanted in the mouth of anyone without exposing that person and the dental staff to enormous amounts of mercury.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
@SimplyForAlexia The problem with this SimplyForAlexia post is it is fake.
Not only do I cite the relevant peer reviewed scientific experiments upon which this video is based you will undoubtedly note that Alexia cites none whatsoever. So can rhetoric trump science? Absolutely if the people are uneducated and the forces of evil of which Alexia is a big part are vociferous enough. On the other hand I personally think that is is past time for punishment of the lying mercury-implant perpetrators.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
Comment removed
Mythodiir 3 months ago
@Mythodiir But then again most of us do not like inhaling exhaust fumes and thanks to the efforts of the Green movement our automobiles today are soooo much cleaner than when I was 14. I remember when driving in LA the smog was so bad I had to get off the freeway and go to a bathroom and wash my eyes.
The big difference I see between smoking and exhaust is you suck on the cigarette and it primarily affects you but exhaust affects everyone.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
This wasn't about smoking -- it was about the release of mercury vapor in tooth fillings. You might want to watch the video before commenting.
HallikGreymane 3 months ago
@HallikGreymane Thank you for this comment.
And apparently smoking will reduce cognitive functions too;-)
Mike Ziff pointed out that cigarette smoking greatly increased the mercury vapors coming off fillings. Paranandi recently showed that mercury caused the permeability in arteries that is believed to be the root cause of atherosclerosis so perhaps the fact that they cannot tell the difference between smoking and smoking teeth is indicative of this phenomena?
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
OH SHITDICK
underleafe 3 months ago
so do u get high by smoking a teeth, thx
chars414 3 months ago
@chars414 No but you do get neurological impairment and a whole host of diseases. In fact an excellent book "The Missing Link" by Michael Ziff connected smoking of cigarettes to the release of mercury from teeth. The mercury from fillings is linked to the perforation of the arteries which allows the cholesterol to build up in between the layers and cause atherosclerosis.
Sadly Mike also smoked and died of an aneurysm another vascular disorder linked to mercury and smoking.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read my investigations Those are Cientific because of proquest Data Base and it has NAME, PLACES, NUMBERS and, DATES.
lifesupportsystem-->dot-->wordpress-->dot-->com
I have 1 investigation and 1 case of study, enjoy
and sent me a lots of e-mail.
This ends here.!
JuanGerardoHernandez 3 months ago
Listen, he is trying to warn us LISTEN UP WILL YOU?
presouz 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 Im so sad, Dental crap between these silver fillings and flouride? SO many illness over the years from CFS to thyriod, all in the name of what? We cant even protect our loved ones cuz BIG EFFING BROTHER is failing us.. BIG TIME Im sick to death of this.. they will get theirs but NOT SOON ENOUGH FOR ME!
presouz 3 months ago
My life has improved 200% since removing a mercury filling..a massive one at that...I really distrust dentists and doctors now...
bartlemy 3 months ago
@allenrobinson2012 No, on the contrary. I loled because of the need some folk really need the obvious pointed out to them. It's incredibly stupid to think gas layers by atomic weight.
costa200 3 months ago
How do we know this is mercury vapour?
cheshirecatalyst62 3 months ago
@cheshirecatalyst62 By reviewing either "It really Is Mercury" or watching "The beautiful Truth (excerpts)" where an instrument calibrated to only measure mercury is used to verify the level seen and in addition review Atomic absorption on Wikipedia so that you can understand the physics that when we are using a 253.7 nm light as in the demonstration it only shows mercury.
davidkennedydds 3 months ago
Boyle's law and gay-Lussacs have nothing to do with a solid material such as amalgam. Hot air does rise and can carry small particles, until it diffuses(ironically, Boyle's Law) I've never seen something so full of *&$%, yea we'll cure ya for 14.95 plus S+H.Sure there's mercury in the air about one part per 750 billion. Btw amalgams have elemental mercury not methylmercury....
coldblue31 4 months ago
@coldblue31 The mercury you can see rising either in this video or if you prefer to watch it falling in "The Beautiful Truth" since we did not heat up that old amalgam, is a gas and not particulate. Therefore it will obey the laws of gasses.
In a recent risk assessment of dental personnel exposure to mercury Richardson calculated that their greatest risk was from respirable particles of amalgam.
I have nothing for sale but dentists are deceptively selling mercury while calling it silver.
davidkennedydds 4 months ago
Mercury is heavier than oxygen. It wouldn't float up.
Greenwickpress 4 months ago