In test one, the second was much better, you can easily smooth it out, but it looks more realistic than the first (Smoother one). In the second test, obviously the first was better, of course that may be due to the incompetence of the uploader.
Flowline looks like dense liquid and blender looks like a bunch of small particles or less dense liquid. I like flowline better, but it's very subjective.
RealFlow Is better with fluid because that's mostly what it's about! Blender Isn't Just About water simulations. That's Why realflow looks better! Great vid by the way, I like both simulations...xD
You can get great effects with BOTH software. It's really how YOU set it up and tweak it that will make it more realistic. Adding splash particles for foam in krakatoa will also add more realism.
@b1tTutorials You can't buy flowline. Scanline Studios makes and owns Flowline and they don't sell it. Flowline is only used on projects done by Scanline. Do some research before you start correcting people.
The first one with Blender was better, the other one looked too oily. But i recon the actual fluid simulator on the second Blender one was fixed, cos I have made fluid sims like that and they haven't ended up like that
Scanline Flowline se ve mejor. La viscocidad y la metaballs se comportan mucho mejor en la 2da scena, se nota en la tension superficial, si es que en algun momento uno quisiera simular una escena de inundacion
Interesting. In the first comparison Blender looks slightly more realistic to me, and in the second Flowline is inarguably far superior (although as others have commented on, the actual water density looks like it might be different, I also feel you cut Blenders second video off to quickly)
@siperdellyeer the first and third one is the comercial what not and the second and fourth is blender freeware. and i must say for it being free it doesnt look to bad at all.
Blender held up pretty good in the first. The second one for blender looked like it was less fluid being used, which, if the amount of fluid was actually the same, shows the limits of blender's capabilities. All in all, Blender is an amazing opensource entry to the genre.
@UBERxL33T From what I can see, he mistyped his comment. He was sayin that "to me Blender looks better than flowline which is probably 15- 50 000 bucks"
It's hard to make any conclusions from a comparison like this unless you go all out and make very strictly sure that every single setting of both simulators are exactly equal - voxel grid densities, viscosities, and so on. Not really possible since their option sets do not fully overlap. They're both awesome (but Blender kicks ass).
<<<<------click austinartwar to view. I used Blender 3d to make anti Bp clips . I need the blender community's support. Make your own if you have the time and video post a reply.
<<<<------click austinartwar to view. I used Blender 3d to make anti Bp clips . I need the blender community's support. Make your own if you have the time and video post a reply.
Yeah perhaps i'm but it is a pretty stupid question that disrespects the communities that put so much hard work into it.
Not everyone is out to get you, and it is very rare to find an open source project that has malicious intent.
If you do end up giving it a shot, i say good luck aa learning 3d is a very time laborious job, and you will need to work out the answers to a lot of questions by yourself. And that isnt a sarcastic comment at all.
It looks like this comparison wasn't set up well. Blender is clearly handicapped here, with low-res fluid for no real reason other than to make the other thing look good.
commercial software are weaker some times in front of blender. some time u just get shocked how much one small open source software can do. one example it this fluid simulation. and BIG BUCK BUNNY
blender is getting advanced every day . one day it will be one of the best in commercial world.
Blender is not Freeware, it's Free? That is what Freeware means....
I personally love Blender, it's great to see free software this powerful. Everyone can (legally!) acquire and use the program, another perk that might hinder people without thousands to spend on 3ds Max, etc.
actually its open source. Freeware is when Its a single individual person making software for free, blender is an entire community of people, so technically its not 'freeware'.
But legally will never cost any money because its under a gnu license.
flowline is better for water but I have to say blender is better knowing that it's a free-ware and it would b kinda pathidic if a free-ware beat a pay-ware animator
@TechnoStickmen you have to remember that Flowline wa made only for simulatinos. Blender was made for a hole lot of different features. which limits how long then can concentrate on making somethign accurate
ur right... i've looked up flowline a little bit ago and it blew me away... it even calculates the way air moves under water and it has benn used in countless movies such as ironman and the 2012 movie. I had no idea back then. Oh well, too bad I can't get a hold of it.
Hmmm... I guess we have to agree to disagree, but i value your opinion. May i just add that 3dsmax is the best investment i ever made, and you should look up it's awesome particles. Keep modellin.
I don't really think 3dsmax 2010 has dated modeling tools at all. Also maya is much more exspensive, of course it's better. They are both the top programs in the industry.
can i just ask though. why you think blender kicks flowlines ars? seriously. Flowline has a much more accurate way of calculating particles and you can get alot more detail from it aswell. Were as with blender you can see its detailing level is not as high as flowlines
Because those things you just stated are your opinion. Projects can be spent time on until they look nearly 100 Percent real in any 3d software. I believe blender kicks flowlines ass because for what you get for free... It's truely amazing if you ask me. Also, with this video on fluid simulations, blender looks like the one with the upper-hand.. That is my opinion.
@danielkirk1 well yeh i agree that for a program thats free the simulation is amazing. But the second video. The last one is blender. and it looks realy crap and unrealistic
But we have to remember that the project used to show the demonstration could of been improved even to the point that blender and flowline look exactly the same. This of course if much different with top of the line programs such as Maya and 3ds... Because of their advanced technology rendering. If Flowline is better, it's by a fraction. And why would you pay for a program that is a fraction better than a free one? :)
right. but adding ray transparency or sub-surface scattering would have increased a lot the render time. that's the only reason why it's a "solid" looking fluid
In test one, the second was much better, you can easily smooth it out, but it looks more realistic than the first (Smoother one). In the second test, obviously the first was better, of course that may be due to the incompetence of the uploader.
masterapmark 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i llike that work I would like to be able once to make something like that with blender 3d Modeling Thank you very much i like that
abdeddineamine 1 month ago
holy crap that took 30h to render and bake? Please tell me you have a wooden pc
BuzzyBe 2 months ago 5
Flowline looks like dense liquid and blender looks like a bunch of small particles or less dense liquid. I like flowline better, but it's very subjective.
vd853 2 months ago
@vd853 Plus with Blender you don't exactly need to blow your money away to get it.
filmfast 2 months ago
RealFlow Is better with fluid because that's mostly what it's about! Blender Isn't Just About water simulations. That's Why realflow looks better! Great vid by the way, I like both simulations...xD
WolfenCrew 2 months ago
You can get great effects with BOTH software. It's really how YOU set it up and tweak it that will make it more realistic. Adding splash particles for foam in krakatoa will also add more realism.
staphinfection 2 months ago
@staphinfection YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT SIR
curias7 2 months ago
30 AAAHH
GATUKILLER1 2 months ago
Eeez nyce!
FlyingLaptop 3 months ago
This will be in update 1.9 of minecraft
jakethe22 3 months ago
uh so i dont get it... 30 hours, what was the point of this? If it was a "test" it doesnt need to be on youtube lol.... what now?
still cool though, thumbed up
Shoxjie 3 months ago
they are all awesome
legoneurt 3 months ago
1: blender 2: flowline
geeiwoder 3 months ago
@b1tTutorials its proprietary of scanline studios. It isnt commercially available, only the studio uses it.
BMAnnArbor 3 months ago
better than reality
bellapetuttidario93 3 months ago
Blender is better, because it is free!
flan3002 3 months ago
First one looks like the consitantsy of milk lol.
cripplefinger 3 months ago
I wonder if my calculator could render this
TheTechBite 3 months ago
@TheTechBite pfff, my potato can render this in 2 hours
72dew 3 months ago
@TheTechBite if you build a calculator with a quadcore, 8gb ram and linux as a os than you should able to do this. xD
b1tTutorials 3 months ago
How did u get flowline
BMAnnArbor 3 months ago
@BMAnnArbor bought?
its really hard to understand that you can get easly software if you buy it .)
b1tTutorials 3 months ago
@b1tTutorials You can't buy flowline. Scanline Studios makes and owns Flowline and they don't sell it. Flowline is only used on projects done by Scanline. Do some research before you start correcting people.
BMAnnArbor 3 months ago
The second one was much better!
Markus9705 4 months ago
What Render an Bake settigs do you Use in Blender
JailbreakAG 4 months ago
The first one with Blender was better, the other one looked too oily. But i recon the actual fluid simulator on the second Blender one was fixed, cos I have made fluid sims like that and they haven't ended up like that
TheBlenderAristocrat 4 months ago
i never liked clear liquids anyways
humanidt 4 months ago
Flowline looks far superior in every aspect.
Digitalstorm007 4 months ago
Looks like the resolution was biggerib the Flowline ones, and the parameters of the liquid weren't tweaked to behave the same
TiagoTiagoT 5 months ago
blender seems to be really powerfull
bambumbang 5 months ago
The 30h render time stat is totally meaningless unless you tell us the machine spec it was rendered on...
2000jago 5 months ago
I honestly think the second blender one was botched. too many particles and less volume, they could have done a better job
randosity42 5 months ago
@randosity42
your right!
Adoringprodigyfan 5 months ago
Am I the only one who thinks that in the first scene, Blender looked better?
For the second scene the first one looked better. Unfortunately there was no indication which one was Blender.
Evi1M4chine 5 months ago
30 h rendering and baking for 360p?
SBE1231 5 months ago
May be you don't know how to use flowline!
ibrahim3d 5 months ago
Damn, I've never baked for 30 hours straight.. :]
oIndee 6 months ago
@oIndee But have you /been/ baked for 30 hours straight? :3
Dth091 6 months ago
lol blender sucks in comparison. actually there is no comparison. blender sims are unusable for VFX shots.
parapobabam 7 months ago
Scanline Flowline se ve mejor. La viscocidad y la metaballs se comportan mucho mejor en la 2da scena, se nota en la tension superficial, si es que en algun momento uno quisiera simular una escena de inundacion
SeianVision 7 months ago
looks like milk. I LIKE MILK!
DestroyerOfWorlds212 7 months ago
in test one the second ones better in test two the first ones beter
jeffddow 7 months ago 22
Flowline looks more like yoghurt, because of the water density.
Blender has the possibility to do so, but when rendering water it looks most realistic.
And its free.
LifeRunner4000 7 months ago
CINEMA 4d!!
ChazyChazta 8 months ago
milk?
encounter99 8 months ago
Flowline looks a lot better in the 2nd one!
skinlo01 8 months ago 69
flowline looks ike its disenagrating
basketballdude138 9 months ago
30 H TO RENDER?! OMG :O!
SnakeBiit 9 months ago
Flowline looks like cement.
ATmegaProgrammer 9 months ago
Wow !!! That should be in game !!!
Sahuu7 9 months ago
Thats sick! It looks photo realistic
Johnny89Applez 9 months ago
Blender! Blender! Blender! i have blender! its awesome and easy... ish...
oniondeluxe 9 months ago
Interesting. In the first comparison Blender looks slightly more realistic to me, and in the second Flowline is inarguably far superior (although as others have commented on, the actual water density looks like it might be different, I also feel you cut Blenders second video off to quickly)
Vire70 10 months ago
Crysis 3
oelboy 10 months ago
Would be cool to have this in minecraft§!
FSXgta 10 months ago
muito Loko! Gostei.
Animesenhista 10 months ago
wtf fuck was that at 0:17 ???
siperdellyeer 11 months ago
@siperdellyeer the first and third one is the comercial what not and the second and fourth is blender freeware. and i must say for it being free it doesnt look to bad at all.
strgzr53 10 months ago
@strgzr53 yeah but whats that at 0:17???
siperdellyeer 10 months ago
@siperdellyeer that would be blender. it goes flowline blender flowline blender.
strgzr53 10 months ago
@strgzr53 but the 4th looks like a million (my)ballz attacking a city lol
siperdellyeer 10 months ago
Blender held up pretty good in the first. The second one for blender looked like it was less fluid being used, which, if the amount of fluid was actually the same, shows the limits of blender's capabilities. All in all, Blender is an amazing opensource entry to the genre.
mknomad5 11 months ago 3
ok thats awesome but i really want milk now
wilt778 11 months ago
I love the scene at 0:14, how is this made possible?
TheUFMProductions 11 months ago
first one looked like cloth.try realflow vs blender
HDLiFeGFX 1 year ago
got milk?
JamDP1100 1 year ago
Milk!!!
huudiduu 1 year ago
it takes an hour calculation to make 10 seconds video...
ekWagonn 1 year ago
Flowline is so much more better in rendering.
FOGoticus 1 year ago
well the fluid simulation was not so good in the second action, you need to improve that.
sonitekca 1 year ago
I am a blender user, but I think I like the "stringiness" of the Flowline simulation better, especially in the second test.
ctgartland 1 year ago
Its great But, Will it Blend?That is the Question
ConnorsworldAU 1 year ago 103
@ConnorsworldAU it have already been blended... Several times...
2009MachineGun 1 year ago
@ConnorsworldAU It does in Blender!
googiek 5 months ago
@ConnorsworldAU your a fag. everyone says that. be original douche bag
culliganbro1 4 months ago
@ConnorsworldAU i don't get that reference....
Elijan1996 3 months ago
Blender is defenitly better in the first test (especially with the overhang at the back where the other program makes it seam like thick paint)
However the 2nd test blender's version just looks pathetic...
Dasmaster1 1 year ago 3
Flowline seems to have the apperance of chocolate milk o_o
TRIVIUMrocker123 1 year ago
render time 12 years...
chris06VFX 1 year ago
0:13, best ive ever seen
nils4545 1 year ago
Both are mind blowing o_O
Fabzil 1 year ago
Blender has better simulation in my opinion. blender wins. XD AND ITS FREE
Zarac1121123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@UBERxL33T You're only making yourself look like an idiot.
brendonnelly 1 year ago
i'm only starting with 3D , so sorry for the stupid question but what is "Baking" for?
rzb82 1 year ago
@rzb82 it completes the simulation frames.
KiLlA5321 1 year ago
@rzb82 Calculating the fluid motion. Usually using the navier stokes equations.
TheGiantSponge 1 year ago
@UBERxL33T From what I can see, he mistyped his comment. He was sayin that "to me Blender looks better than flowline which is probably 15- 50 000 bucks"
brendonnelly 1 year ago
@UBERxL33T Why dont you fuck off retard just leave me alone and get rid of this video if your going to be a jackass ...
THEPOLARIS KID MOFO
ThePolarisKid 1 year ago
BLENDER IS BETTER THAN WHAT?
MOXWELLDIAMOND 1 year ago
@UBERxL33T i know i was saying thatb flowline was 15,00 to 50,00 dollars you tard i have blender
ThePolarisKid 1 year ago
to me blender looks BETTER than that probably $15,000 - $50,000
commercial program
thumbs up if you think so too
ThePolarisKid 1 year ago
blender wins
Zarac1121123 1 year ago
thats my cum
marcoffs95 1 year ago
does this take a long to to convert it in to video or compile or what ever you do to make it work
ronniereiff 1 year ago
this is the best fluid demonstration ive seen. the liquid doesnt look so much like jelly, it looks thinner, and overall more like water. great job.
~ashz~
CloudZ21 1 year ago
always thought blender was better
danielflasher95 1 year ago
I saw a pretty cool Blender made B-2 Stealth Bomber animation and that was awesome, I'd hate to see the bake and render time.
LightningCat315 1 year ago
that's not water O_O is CUM XD
Ametallica67 1 year ago
@Ametallica67 lol and O_O
Zarac1121123 1 year ago
It's hard to make any conclusions from a comparison like this unless you go all out and make very strictly sure that every single setting of both simulators are exactly equal - voxel grid densities, viscosities, and so on. Not really possible since their option sets do not fully overlap. They're both awesome (but Blender kicks ass).
chorioretinitis 1 year ago
First test, Blender
second test, they both werent great.....but i like the second one more becasue it didnt look like spiderman was skeeting :P
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
the first flowline sim looked a bit.. a bit like drippy batter, or, some sort of milk, it wasnt really water, blender seemed more like water .
KiodrinTutorials 1 year ago
Really god job!
zzxcrozzy 1 year ago
on the first simulation the second one was far better. on the second simulation the first one was better.
RemnantsOfBeauty 1 year ago 2
YOU ARE EPIC
carbint2 1 year ago
they use the same font that Bullet for my Valentine uses!
soccerfreak97 1 year ago
what is the font?
Borzekes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
<<<<------click austinartwar to view. I used Blender 3d to make anti Bp clips . I need the blender community's support. Make your own if you have the time and video post a reply.
austinartwar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
<<<<------click austinartwar to view. I used Blender 3d to make anti Bp clips . I need the blender community's support. Make your own if you have the time and video post a reply.
austinartwar 1 year ago
The link is broken.
lolitsmejoellol 1 year ago
Why is the first one different a different color? I like the second one's movement but not the grey color.
J0RDSKI 1 year ago
i just LOVE the ambient occlusion!!
bouchandre 1 year ago
flowline wins and allways will its the besy simulator there is
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 year ago
Very sweet!
Fireball9392 1 year ago
That is great
roflcoopter88 1 year ago
30H? WOW i cant wait... i m playing with algodoo
zancudonegro 1 year ago
blender is virus free, right?
Lugia625 1 year ago
@Lugia625
yes, because we all know that free software must mean people want to destroy your computer. I mean why else would somone make something free.
(use a bit of common sense here mate.)
muzzoid 1 year ago
@muzzoid
You would be suprised how mean *cough* and rude (sarcastic) people on the internet can be.
Lugia625 1 year ago
@Lugia625
Yeah perhaps i'm but it is a pretty stupid question that disrespects the communities that put so much hard work into it.
Not everyone is out to get you, and it is very rare to find an open source project that has malicious intent.
If you do end up giving it a shot, i say good luck aa learning 3d is a very time laborious job, and you will need to work out the answers to a lot of questions by yourself. And that isnt a sarcastic comment at all.
muzzoid 1 year ago
@muzzoid
Truthfully, I intended no offense to the makers of the program, I'm just being careful.
Lugia625 1 year ago
flowline.
It's not really fair, though, because flowline is a commercial product and blender is open source.
TheFXGuy 1 year ago
It looks like this comparison wasn't set up well. Blender is clearly handicapped here, with low-res fluid for no real reason other than to make the other thing look good.
cb2198 1 year ago
@vincent8er I liked blender best!! You'r pretty dum.
cmsteph 1 year ago
@vincent8er Itts a... program, what you think it was dude?
saulpila 1 year ago
commercial software are weaker some times in front of blender. some time u just get shocked how much one small open source software can do. one example it this fluid simulation. and BIG BUCK BUNNY
blender is getting advanced every day . one day it will be one of the best in commercial world.
clow20000 1 year ago
In the first one of flowline the liquid sticks together and sort of fans out into long edges before it breaks. It looks like REALLY thick paint.
Blender looks more realistic to me. Even the fact that you are comparing it to a commercial product shows how awesome blender is.
DeathSlayer2 1 year ago
i think flowline is a little bit better than blender in big water massers
TheUnForceable 1 year ago 2
BLENDER
mysoulstudos 1 year ago
0:15
2012 !!!!!!!
LOL
azhad1998 1 year ago
blender isn't freeware, its opensource
gofish326 1 year ago
I like flowline
MrAgentMoo 1 year ago
BLENDER!!!
cmsteph 1 year ago 114
I agree with the (possibly) general consensus that Blender might have a tiny advantage in the first and a significant disadvantage in the second...
But since Blender is developed by the community, hopefully someone will watch this and figure out how to improve Blender... Get on it!
PaperIsland 1 year ago 45
This demo is 3 years old, so may not be representative any more.
modplanman 1 year ago 3
@PaperIsland not to mention that the setup for the second in blender isn't nearly as good..
Knexxuss 10 months ago
flowlines better for water
willsfilms2 1 year ago
flowline wins the second sim, but blender is better because you don't need to pay for it
The13thlego 1 year ago
Blender is not Freeware, it's Free? That is what Freeware means....
I personally love Blender, it's great to see free software this powerful. Everyone can (legally!) acquire and use the program, another perk that might hinder people without thousands to spend on 3ds Max, etc.
PhoenixBlenderArt 2 years ago
actually its open source. Freeware is when Its a single individual person making software for free, blender is an entire community of people, so technically its not 'freeware'.
But legally will never cost any money because its under a gnu license.
bcasts 1 year ago
cool video
oh 0:00 blender is not freeware its free! :-)
JannisAdmek 2 years ago
blender rulez
RazaKator 2 years ago
Blender i think wins the first round blender is aeosme for being free
XAutomatedOwnerX 2 years ago 5
Blender 4 ever :D
rotjesenmatjes 2 years ago
And blender is the winner! I think so because the fluid in flowline seems like a bunch of balls and blender looks more formed.
AGFuzzyPancake 2 years ago
but Blender is free.. and it kicks ass! :D
been using blender since i was 10 :)
Q3o5 2 years ago
flowline is better for water but I have to say blender is better knowing that it's a free-ware and it would b kinda pathidic if a free-ware beat a pay-ware animator
joshua987430roblox 2 years ago
Milk :D
FusionPentax 2 years ago
blender still kicks but even compared to other share ware and now it has smoke physics built in!
TechnoStickmen 2 years ago
i love blender but after seeing this i can see flowline is a bit smoother and it looks really cool at 0:14. still blender kicks but for a freeware.
TechnoStickmen 2 years ago
@TechnoStickmen you have to remember that Flowline wa made only for simulatinos. Blender was made for a hole lot of different features. which limits how long then can concentrate on making somethign accurate
nendo 2 years ago
ur right... i've looked up flowline a little bit ago and it blew me away... it even calculates the way air moves under water and it has benn used in countless movies such as ironman and the 2012 movie. I had no idea back then. Oh well, too bad I can't get a hold of it.
TechnoStickmen 2 years ago
Lol look at 0:07 how flowline has FAIL water particles. Blender rocks! ROCKS! ROOOOOCCCCKSSS!!!!
*sorry*
danielkirk1 2 years ago
I dunno, Flowline has much more flowing water.
Asdam12 2 years ago
at 0:07 flowline reminds me of chocolate
TechnoStickmen 2 years ago
Maybe i should buy flowline to help my sweet tooth lol.
danielkirk1 2 years ago
@danielkirk1 yeh but lokos at 14 seconds. That simulatino kicks blenders ars
nendo 2 years ago
Hmmm... I guess we have to agree to disagree, but i value your opinion. May i just add that 3dsmax is the best investment i ever made, and you should look up it's awesome particles. Keep modellin.
danielkirk1 2 years ago
@danielkirk1 i think maya beats 3d max tbh. i think 3d max features to be abit dated. spesh the modeling tools
nendo 2 years ago
I don't really think 3dsmax 2010 has dated modeling tools at all. Also maya is much more exspensive, of course it's better. They are both the top programs in the industry.
danielkirk1 2 years ago
can i just ask though. why you think blender kicks flowlines ars? seriously. Flowline has a much more accurate way of calculating particles and you can get alot more detail from it aswell. Were as with blender you can see its detailing level is not as high as flowlines
nendo 2 years ago 2
Because those things you just stated are your opinion. Projects can be spent time on until they look nearly 100 Percent real in any 3d software. I believe blender kicks flowlines ass because for what you get for free... It's truely amazing if you ask me. Also, with this video on fluid simulations, blender looks like the one with the upper-hand.. That is my opinion.
danielkirk1 2 years ago
@danielkirk1 well yeh i agree that for a program thats free the simulation is amazing. But the second video. The last one is blender. and it looks realy crap and unrealistic
nendo 2 years ago
But we have to remember that the project used to show the demonstration could of been improved even to the point that blender and flowline look exactly the same. This of course if much different with top of the line programs such as Maya and 3ds... Because of their advanced technology rendering. If Flowline is better, it's by a fraction. And why would you pay for a program that is a fraction better than a free one? :)
danielkirk1 2 years ago
Flowlines aint much better & Blender is free nuff said.
TakeOnNE1 1 year ago 6
blender
MrRainshow 2 years ago
which one is better?
pokeplatinum62 2 years ago
Can you imagine guys, one day the games will have that kind of physics.
MrFrooost 2 years ago 4
@MrFrooost im looking forward to that :P
no1hasgotthename 2 years ago
I think the second one looks slightly better because the first one covered it like cream, while blender's was more realistic cream.
SethiXzon 2 years ago
first test I thought the second one was the best, but the second test I thought the first one was definitively the best.
cl1mbat1ze 2 years ago 34
@cl1mbat1ze
Yeah, at the second test the second one sucked.
Bru2712 1 year ago
@cl1mbat1ze there is a difference between realism and the amount of epicness there is.
PixelKore 1 year ago
I prefer blender, probably because its completely free XD
Lordofthyself 2 years ago 45
hehe, you hit the nail on the head there xD
007walk 2 years ago
blender does not seem to take into account waters surface tension.
jaffey2006 2 years ago
BLENDER IS WAY BETTER
neverunderstanding 2 years ago
i still think blender is better
Brijanoslav 2 years ago
the first one imo
cuz u have to take into account transparency
it wont look as bulky
kantana1022 2 years ago
right. but adding ray transparency or sub-surface scattering would have increased a lot the render time. that's the only reason why it's a "solid" looking fluid
FaWeil 2 years ago