@creativeprojects720 Yeah, loads of 50's aircraft still in use. B52, CH-47, AH-1, UH-1, C-130. Stuff like that. Alot of it upgraded of course into many different variants.
@mrjkt123 actually TU-95 is not shit. it is strategic bomber, not fighter aircraft. so jet engines are not priority. It is considered one of the best strategic bomber aircraft today.
@mrjkt123 I hope you are kidding. There are Satellite based L-Band radars that can light up any stealth bomber like a Christmas tree, so stealth is hardly an advantage when dealing with advanced countries that have Satellite based radar tech. Besides, jet engines make more heat, which is a relevant thermal missile magnet.
Yea i remeber that, i read it in the news paper, they flew over sweden,coast of norweagian airspace and then over the dutch coast, dutch,swedish and english jet fighter were scrambeld to intercept the two TU-95 bombers,
It scared me little bit.
The russian said that the two TU-95 were lost that night and that they had followd the coast, but i know better because they are testing our responding time.
Sweet, sweet aircraft. Too bad (US)submarines could detect it flying over with their sonars, bummer... These Bears still come pretty close to our (dutch) airspace. A months ago, or something, we had 2 of 'em probing around. F16 were sent to intercept them.
LOL 41point2 you're a friggin' idiot! the challenge was not to be able to write in space! it was to make a pen that would be able to write in space! NOT A PENCIL! LOL fucking idiot! and that was not a joke from a russian, that was from a congressional hearing NASA had, trying to justify government spennding on certain unnecessary projects, you fool.
2 of these bad boys where flying near western europe yesterday, possible just a training flight. they flew along the danish and norwegian westcoast.. amazing long flights "around" europe.
Russia/former U.S.S.R is the king of making ugly planes and helicopters. GO western aircraft you couldn't pay me 1,000 to fly a TU-154... Well maybe lol
Great bomber that is perfect for the Russians. They should not have invested in the Tu-160 when it doesn't fit what they want and costs too much for them.
There is a matter of concern: Tu-95 is very heavy before take off,l and takes many minutes to achieve enough airspeed to lift from ground. In case of surprise missile attack I believe they hardly could escape from distruction on ground, even in the most interior bases like Engels
I can understand that bla, bla , bla...sure nice plane...but the language they have...hart attack!...thanks God they only spend money with this shit and they never use it ...
The submariners say that they can hear TU-95 flying off half across the Earth. Such is a power of these excellent airplanes. Russian avionics is the best.
thats some great engineering! I must say, if there is one positive aspect of the cold war, it wouid be the amazing engineering/ technological advancements achieved in such little timespan. Russia scared the shit out of USA with sputnik 1, and usa went crazy makin new weapons and planes and space shuttles. Man, i would love to fly one of these tu-95's, but it will never beat b-52
It reminds me of the story from the joint USA \ Soviet space missions. An American astronaut shows the Russian a Pen that can work in zero gravity. The Russian asked "How much Money"? The American proudly boasts $1 Million dollars. The Russians laughs, "Next time try a pencil."
Hope this plane never is used for what it was built for.
@41point2 Только в этом анекдоте тактично умолчали о том, что графит от карандаша сильно загрязняет воздух на корабле, а астронавты на деле использовали что-то типо фломастера.
@MrRein1988 Hello Comrade, Just passing on the story. I think this was in the earliest of space exploration. In the conversation between the two astronaut, a felt pen wasn't mentioned and I don't know if they had them back then.
@Doraemonchina that's a good point, but by the time you shoot the bear down supersonic cruise missiles with thermonuclear warheads would have annihilated their targets. That's why bear is still in service, it's not designed to fly to new york and drop a bomb, but rather get close enough and launch nuclear tipped cruise missiles.
@bombarderoazul Educate yourself regarding NATO air defense systems before making grand sweeping statements such as "by the time you shoot the bear down supersonic cruise missiles with thermonuclear warheads would have annihilated their targets". Where is your evidence or proof of this?
The truth is it wouldn't get anywhere NEAR its intended launch point before being shot down, and even if it did, the cruise missiles it might launch would also be shot down by current (and anti-missile) systems
@AvatarAlphaOmega yes i agree the missile would probably get shot down, a bear carries 8 to 12 KH 55 missiles which have a range of 1,600 miles, that's a pretty good range, about NY to texas, i guess the best strategy would be to use a swarm of bombers firing sevel hundred of missiles at once, this would overwhelm the defense systems.
@41point2 USA in 1949 had a national debt aproximately 140% of its gdp, MUCH larger then todays debt thats a mere 100% of gdp. Don't overate US debt, it wont destroy us nor will it give China the ability to do so [unless they want to committ suicide & don't want us to consume their products].
You russian,are crazy people,
Axxisization 1 month ago
1950's aircraft still in use today? amazing.
creativeprojects720 1 month ago
@creativeprojects720 Yeah, loads of 50's aircraft still in use. B52, CH-47, AH-1, UH-1, C-130. Stuff like that. Alot of it upgraded of course into many different variants.
TheGwunt 1 month ago
@TheGwunt yeah well, it's still amazing to see. Especially prop driven. In this era of f-22 raptors.
creativeprojects720 1 month ago
@creativeprojects720 More amazing to see B-52s over 60 years old still being the strategic workhorse of US.
CrushTheNewOrder 1 week ago
@CrushTheNewOrder American ingenuity at its finest, right?
eyeAMtwinkEE 1 week ago
@eyeAMtwinkEE More like tight finances and inability to maintain an expensive nuclear triad.
CrushTheNewOrder 1 week ago
@CrushTheNewOrder Luckily then the US has the B2 for missions other than bombing shanty towns in the middle east.
eyeAMtwinkEE 1 week ago
@CrushTheNewOrder yes, but at least they are jet powered.
creativeprojects720 2 days ago
@creativeprojects720 Those were built in 1980s, at the earliest.
CrushTheNewOrder 1 week ago
@CrushTheNewOrder yes, but they are 1950's designed (models)
creativeprojects720 2 days ago
@mrjkt123 actually TU-95 is not shit. it is strategic bomber, not fighter aircraft. so jet engines are not priority. It is considered one of the best strategic bomber aircraft today.
ELSHADAZERI 2 months ago
@mrjkt123 name 5 modern aircraft in service that are using stealth. dont google it.
akashchahal90 2 months ago
Damn the engines sound like Beasts! :D
semtex9345 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrjkt123 I hope you are kidding. There are Satellite based L-Band radars that can light up any stealth bomber like a Christmas tree, so stealth is hardly an advantage when dealing with advanced countries that have Satellite based radar tech. Besides, jet engines make more heat, which is a relevant thermal missile magnet.
Phadf 2 months ago
I believe it is the fastest prop driven aircraft to date, still used, cruises at over 600+MPH. and its range is very impressive
captaindrifto 3 months ago
Yea i remeber that, i read it in the news paper, they flew over sweden,coast of norweagian airspace and then over the dutch coast, dutch,swedish and english jet fighter were scrambeld to intercept the two TU-95 bombers,
It scared me little bit.
The russian said that the two TU-95 were lost that night and that they had followd the coast, but i know better because they are testing our responding time.
OHAApple 4 months ago
Sweet, sweet aircraft. Too bad (US)submarines could detect it flying over with their sonars, bummer... These Bears still come pretty close to our (dutch) airspace. A months ago, or something, we had 2 of 'em probing around. F16 were sent to intercept them.
hessel666665 5 months ago
LOL 41point2 you're a friggin' idiot! the challenge was not to be able to write in space! it was to make a pen that would be able to write in space! NOT A PENCIL! LOL fucking idiot! and that was not a joke from a russian, that was from a congressional hearing NASA had, trying to justify government spennding on certain unnecessary projects, you fool.
tonymsff 5 months ago
So very impressive, even today.
Looks awsome.
Florianska6
florianska6 5 months ago
is this a turboprop?
TheJaaysog 5 months ago
This is probably one of the best looking, most graceful Soviet-designed weapon out there. Simply magnificent!
hazeleyes1911a1 6 months ago
My favourite propeller-driven aircraft! An impressive and elegant machine.
AvatarAlphaOmega 6 months ago
This is the Fastest propellor driven aircraft built to date.
brendonnz1964 7 months ago
The TU-95 is like a Helicopter, It does'nt fly, It beats the air into submission.
B24zootsnoot 8 months ago 3
2 of these bad boys where flying near western europe yesterday, possible just a training flight. they flew along the danish and norwegian westcoast.. amazing long flights "around" europe.
Eqvaliser 8 months ago
i guess aesthetics were never part of the design process
virustwin 9 months ago
Russia/former U.S.S.R is the king of making ugly planes and helicopters. GO western aircraft you couldn't pay me 1,000 to fly a TU-154... Well maybe lol
NWA941 9 months ago
Didn't they produce an airliner version of this? Must've been loud regarding the fact that it has four huge-ass contra-rotating propellers...
CabbageNappa 10 months ago
Great bomber that is perfect for the Russians. They should not have invested in the Tu-160 when it doesn't fit what they want and costs too much for them.
535party 11 months ago
4 machines, each of them are 15000hp, total 60000hp craft.
jokeopus 1 year ago
@jokeopus with enough decibel to hear even from inside a submarine
Leopardipzg 11 months ago
Lordy that is a sexy piece of hardware.
caspiansm 1 year ago
I really hate how I can't watch a video about a Russian OR American plane without people bickering about which nation is better.
How about this. Neither nation is the better. They're just different. Each has their great parts and their terrible parts. Can we agree on that?
Maxables 1 year ago 12
@Maxables I am afraid it's too compicated for them. Seeing the world in black and white colors is much easier.
Udarn1k 10 months ago
does anybody know the name of the song near the end of the video?
exocet1 1 year ago
@UKkid19 I'm curious....what point are you trying to make since you're obviously not serious about not being able to tell a Tu160 and Tu95 apart?
JackSpenceOCT1984 1 year ago
What is this plane used for?
Oeffinger 1 year ago
@Oeffinger
still in service. designed to drop a lot of bombs, far away from the russian border ;)
Ialocin85 1 year ago
@Oeffinger - Cruise missile strikes now.
bittemeinrammstein 1 year ago
Try the Rockwell B-1B Lancer instead of this WWII hog.
Abeastlypie 1 year ago
There is a matter of concern: Tu-95 is very heavy before take off,l and takes many minutes to achieve enough airspeed to lift from ground. In case of surprise missile attack I believe they hardly could escape from distruction on ground, even in the most interior bases like Engels
anisocoro 1 year ago
@anisocoro in case of surprise missile attack, I belive no air force in the world could archieve a sucessfull counter attack...
MyYouenn 1 year ago
OMG it has contra rotating propellers... how do they work? Are they efficient or is it just showing off?
BadManneredCat 1 year ago
@BadManneredCat
about 6 to 16% efficiency plus... off set by by its mechanical complexity
fajnycycek 1 year ago
I can understand that bla, bla , bla...sure nice plane...but the language they have...hart attack!...thanks God they only spend money with this shit and they never use it ...
GRATZIANI2002 1 year ago
The submariners say that they can hear TU-95 flying off half across the Earth. Such is a power of these excellent airplanes. Russian avionics is the best.
iskander982 1 year ago
Lovely plane, if i was plane colector, i would have to build 1 hangar for this one and another for a B52 adn .....
LoboalphaMASTER 1 year ago
it`s the best plane!
Berzegovsalih 1 year ago
Iconic, beautiful, superb aircraft. Incredible. What a beast !
townclose 2 years ago 29
@townclose
Lol no! It looks sickly and awkward
CrazedMachine 11 months ago
@CrazedMachine Yes perhaps it looks to yo my friend,because you are mentally retired.
nedeljko18 11 months ago
@nedeljko18
good one
CrazedMachine 10 months ago
@townclose
...and louder then fuck.
wowdanalise 9 months ago
That is one mean lookin' machine!
JesusChristoZombia 2 years ago 2
The noise makes it better.
Last real bomber in the air, man. 5/5
Ottoman1337 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ottoman1337 Yeah man can't wait for the US to put up some
B-17s or B-29s.
Nothing says kickass like turboprop!
There's also a rumor that Russia is equipping some of their front line fighters with new technology.
I think it's called radar.
jada7770 1 year ago
thats some great engineering! I must say, if there is one positive aspect of the cold war, it wouid be the amazing engineering/ technological advancements achieved in such little timespan. Russia scared the shit out of USA with sputnik 1, and usa went crazy makin new weapons and planes and space shuttles. Man, i would love to fly one of these tu-95's, but it will never beat b-52
327372 2 years ago 3
Slide ruler.
It reminds me of the story from the joint USA \ Soviet space missions. An American astronaut shows the Russian a Pen that can work in zero gravity. The Russian asked "How much Money"? The American proudly boasts $1 Million dollars. The Russians laughs, "Next time try a pencil."
Hope this plane never is used for what it was built for.
Peace to All !
41point2 2 years ago 65
@41point2 Только в этом анекдоте тактично умолчали о том, что графит от карандаша сильно загрязняет воздух на корабле, а астронавты на деле использовали что-то типо фломастера.
MrRein1988 1 year ago
@MrRein1988 Hello Comrade, Just passing on the story. I think this was in the earliest of space exploration. In the conversation between the two astronaut, a felt pen wasn't mentioned and I don't know if they had them back then.
Cheers
41point2 1 year ago
@41point2 A pencil isn't permanent dipshit.
kris1991 1 year ago
@kris1991 Graphite is permanant
fritzryan 1 year ago
@fritzryan It can be erased you nitwit.
kris1991 1 year ago
@kris1991 At the same time, your trip to space isn't. You can put it in pen when you return. Silly man
Flaggedagain 1 year ago
@41point2 yes i also know that fact.lol americans rly r stupid.and when u tell them that they start bitching.loolz XD
itachiitachi1946 1 year ago
@41point2: This plane would be easily shot down by a modern air defense system papo!!! Your stories is too old!!!
Doraemonchina 1 year ago
@Doraemonchina that's a good point, but by the time you shoot the bear down supersonic cruise missiles with thermonuclear warheads would have annihilated their targets. That's why bear is still in service, it's not designed to fly to new york and drop a bomb, but rather get close enough and launch nuclear tipped cruise missiles.
bombarderoazul 7 months ago
@bombarderoazul Educate yourself regarding NATO air defense systems before making grand sweeping statements such as "by the time you shoot the bear down supersonic cruise missiles with thermonuclear warheads would have annihilated their targets". Where is your evidence or proof of this?
The truth is it wouldn't get anywhere NEAR its intended launch point before being shot down, and even if it did, the cruise missiles it might launch would also be shot down by current (and anti-missile) systems
AvatarAlphaOmega 6 months ago
@AvatarAlphaOmega yes i agree the missile would probably get shot down, a bear carries 8 to 12 KH 55 missiles which have a range of 1,600 miles, that's a pretty good range, about NY to texas, i guess the best strategy would be to use a swarm of bombers firing sevel hundred of missiles at once, this would overwhelm the defense systems.
bombarderoazul 6 months ago
@41point2
Funny thing though is that we still outspent them!
CrazedMachine 11 months ago
@41point2
Just love your comment. Sums up the Russian approach to technology - keep it simple and hence reliable.
I own a Russian wristwatch - a "Polyot" Aviator - mechanical (wind up) which never goes wrong.
Had it serviced once in ten years.
I like the slide rule and remeber using one in architectural school. Think I 've forgotten how to use it now!!
Florianska6
florianska6 5 months ago
@41point2 USA was very cocky at making its space pen which, btw, cost $10 million to develop. Still, if you have the cash why not use it.
prjerry7 4 months ago
@prjerry7
Oh I don't know why you shouldn't spend it. Oh wait here's a possiblity.
We have built debt we and generations to come will never recover from?
China can now destory us by flooding the market with our money?
WE DON'T HAVE A NEED FOR ZERO GRAVITY PENS? Unlist your in a special space of your own.
41point2 3 months ago
@41point2 USA in 1949 had a national debt aproximately 140% of its gdp, MUCH larger then todays debt thats a mere 100% of gdp. Don't overate US debt, it wont destroy us nor will it give China the ability to do so [unless they want to committ suicide & don't want us to consume their products].
Im 99% sure you have no idea how assets work C:
prjerry7 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@41point2 This is NOT Russian space program video.....
So your hope is reality cause TU95 is too old to be used in country VS country combat, so it can be only used only in COINs ;)
And they cannot carry unguided rockets this mean this is useless for russians cause russians in AG combat using NEARLY ONLY unguided rockets.
5:45 Nice joke ;)
macieksoft 4 months ago
@41point2 we ll use it against israel, gooks, niggers and muslims! - fuck you! RaHoWa!
DerSturmerSS 1 month ago
@DerSturmerSS we will use it against your house, racist.
creativeprojects720 1 month ago
Хороший музейный экспонат "Любые стратегичесские задачи"-)))) ну разве что лет 15 назад. Всему своё время. Ту 160 делать надо!!!
ingwar68 2 years ago
such a majestic aircraft!
bullcurr 2 years ago 3
what an awesome plane. with fighter escorts. wow. I love it.
mrfreedomquest 2 years ago
good sounds, very big plane!!!!!!
convair32 2 years ago
It's a shame it is such a noisy plane, other wise it would have been a great bomber.
brenoribeiro2007 2 years ago
ummm .. it IS a great bomber! :-)
xoio 2 years ago 4
not so noisy beyond 2500 km)
ooroborus 2 years ago
Noise is part of its charm!
Raveneyes 2 years ago 4
lol wut does noise have to do with bombing? its not a spyplane LOL
327372 2 years ago
@327372 Have you ever considered the fact that it is so noisy that the US sometimes could pick up its location with their sonar system?
brenoribeiro2007 2 years ago
@brenoribeiro2007
i already heared about that, he must be very launder
LoboalphaMASTER 1 year ago
its used for patrols LOL u dumbass
zumbc 2 years ago
its a strategic bomber u fuckhead. its also used for airborne surveillance. suk my nuts bitch
327372 2 years ago
i just it was
zumbc 2 years ago
great video thanks, shame it's in russian!
neildo 2 years ago
20 out of 10 for this.
mollyisagooddog 2 years ago