Always debris? Don' t you own a television set ? Look at the small 3 foot x 8 foot hole left by the RENO air crash plane ( 37 foot wingspan, even if modified, the plane was obviously still had larger dimensions than a common refrigerator ) with no large distinguishable wreckage and no body of the pilot .
We have all seen pics of aircraft from commercial to military that have crashed at high speed and left debris behind. I dont know what happened here but there should be visible wreckage left behind..............unless it was obliterated while in flight?
We've heard that a fast crash will make plane parts disappear, But I have seen plane that ploughed into mountains with debris visible.
And even if you believe the plane completely burned up and not a single piece avoided burning (miraculous on it's own), where are the engined which could not burn up and weighed tons???
The confusion that resulted in this video is created when someone with very little knowledge listens to fake experts because those fake experts support what they already believe. You're comparing slow speed crashes with a 757 that came out of the sky from a very high altitude at full power.
As far as I can tell the Truther theory is this: The US Government claimed that a passenger jet had crashed into a field. Instead of simply hi-jacking the plane as they had with three others that day, Government agents somehow destroyed the plane and killed all its passengers and crew without anyone noticing. They then blew up a part of a field to make it look like a plane had crashed there. They did all this because they could. Even without evidence against it, it's a fairly weak theory.
Those plane crashes you showed occured during take off or landing at a low altitude and low speed. Flight 93 descended from a high altitude, at 580 mph, at a steep angle. So when it hit the ground it fragmented violently. The pieces of metal are the plane and ash are the plane. And parts of the people on board were found and indentified.
the coroner assholes LOVE to quote about not finding bodies: "The remains of a number of passengers had been found in all five [search] sectors." –Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller
"The fuselage burrowed straight into the earth so forcefully that one of the "black boxes" was recovered at a depth of 25 feet under the ground."
again from Miller: "the 33 passengers, seven crew and four hijackers together weighed roughly 7,000 pounds. They were essentially cremated together upon impact. Hundreds of searchers who climbed the hemlocks and combed the woods for weeks were able to find about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totaling less than 600 pounds, or about 8 percent of the total."
see also "Flight 93 remains yield no evidence" & "FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site" 95% of the plane was recovered
Buddy, you want to know the difference between the crashes shown and flight 93? Flight 93 went into the ground at speeds much higher then those. The hillside crash happened at landing, low speed you god damn tool. I wont even explain the rest, do research and MAYBE you'll understand. You might not be savable.
@poopsyproductions The other HUGE difference is 93 went into the ground near vertical. There was an explosion. Coroners found bits of tissue and have identified ALL the passengers AND four terrorists. idiot CTers like to quote mine the coroner who claimed there were no bodies. What they never quote is his explanation of the statement where he admitted he wasn't surprised. and that what they found were bits and pieces of bodies
I'll give you one good reason, United 93 was approaching the speed of sound when it hit the ground. Were talking about a hollow tube of metal going 700 miles per hour taking a nose dive into a field. It's amazing they found pieces larger than the palm of your hand
@BobcatGoalieSW1 Does anyone else find it fascinating that this and other comments which put forward a reasonable argument have been marked as spam? Truthers often accuse debunkers of being government agents, but it often seems like they're the ones with an agenda.
This has been flagged as spam show
JUST VIEW THE VID ON MY PAGE ..
SkuIICrusherGhost 3 months ago
THIS VIDEO ARE FUCKING SHIT!!! THE ANGLE OF THE IMPACT OF THE CRASH PHOTOS ARE NOT THE SAME ANGLE OF THE 93
LuisJimenez92 4 months ago
They invented a hazmat suit that blocks radiation? That is news to me.
BA17BA17 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Always debris? Don' t you own a television set ? Look at the small 3 foot x 8 foot hole left by the RENO air crash plane ( 37 foot wingspan, even if modified, the plane was obviously still had larger dimensions than a common refrigerator ) with no large distinguishable wreckage and no body of the pilot .
5uspended4nimation 5 months ago
Comment removed
5uspended4nimation 5 months ago
We have all seen pics of aircraft from commercial to military that have crashed at high speed and left debris behind. I dont know what happened here but there should be visible wreckage left behind..............unless it was obliterated while in flight?
zLOSTNOMOREz 5 months ago
We've heard that a fast crash will make plane parts disappear, But I have seen plane that ploughed into mountains with debris visible.
And even if you believe the plane completely burned up and not a single piece avoided burning (miraculous on it's own), where are the engined which could not burn up and weighed tons???
baalisgod666 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That smoke could be something else burning not the plane crash he does not have proof that the smoke is from the plane that crashed
the video does not show the plane or parts of the plane the plane crashed so it is----- fake
Marianmichael100 5 months ago
The confusion that resulted in this video is created when someone with very little knowledge listens to fake experts because those fake experts support what they already believe. You're comparing slow speed crashes with a 757 that came out of the sky from a very high altitude at full power.
lumpheadthump 9 months ago
As far as I can tell the Truther theory is this: The US Government claimed that a passenger jet had crashed into a field. Instead of simply hi-jacking the plane as they had with three others that day, Government agents somehow destroyed the plane and killed all its passengers and crew without anyone noticing. They then blew up a part of a field to make it look like a plane had crashed there. They did all this because they could. Even without evidence against it, it's a fairly weak theory.
TheSobek 9 months ago
Those plane crashes you showed occured during take off or landing at a low altitude and low speed. Flight 93 descended from a high altitude, at 580 mph, at a steep angle. So when it hit the ground it fragmented violently. The pieces of metal are the plane and ash are the plane. And parts of the people on board were found and indentified.
camster910 1 year ago 4
Either you are a truther, an idiot, or a traitor. 911 was clearly an inside job. Just look up WTC7 if you have doubts.
damienrockaterror 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wwwDOTtinyurlDOTcom/flight93pics
HUNDREDS of photos of plane and luggage debris.
v=kxsmhnZeM6w
the coroner assholes LOVE to quote about not finding bodies: "The remains of a number of passengers had been found in all five [search] sectors." –Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller
"The fuselage burrowed straight into the earth so forcefully that one of the "black boxes" was recovered at a depth of 25 feet under the ground."
lennyhipp 1 year ago
again from Miller: "the 33 passengers, seven crew and four hijackers together weighed roughly 7,000 pounds. They were essentially cremated together upon impact. Hundreds of searchers who climbed the hemlocks and combed the woods for weeks were able to find about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totaling less than 600 pounds, or about 8 percent of the total."
see also "Flight 93 remains yield no evidence" & "FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site" 95% of the plane was recovered
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp Yeah CTers are idiots. Truthers piss me off.
poopsyproductions 1 year ago
Buddy, you want to know the difference between the crashes shown and flight 93? Flight 93 went into the ground at speeds much higher then those. The hillside crash happened at landing, low speed you god damn tool. I wont even explain the rest, do research and MAYBE you'll understand. You might not be savable.
poopsyproductions 1 year ago
@poopsyproductions The other HUGE difference is 93 went into the ground near vertical. There was an explosion. Coroners found bits of tissue and have identified ALL the passengers AND four terrorists. idiot CTers like to quote mine the coroner who claimed there were no bodies. What they never quote is his explanation of the statement where he admitted he wasn't surprised. and that what they found were bits and pieces of bodies
lennyhipp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'll give you one good reason, United 93 was approaching the speed of sound when it hit the ground. Were talking about a hollow tube of metal going 700 miles per hour taking a nose dive into a field. It's amazing they found pieces larger than the palm of your hand
BobcatGoalieSW1 1 year ago
@BobcatGoalieSW1 Agreed.
poopsyproductions 1 year ago
@BobcatGoalieSW1 Does anyone else find it fascinating that this and other comments which put forward a reasonable argument have been marked as spam? Truthers often accuse debunkers of being government agents, but it often seems like they're the ones with an agenda.
TheSobek 9 months ago