Um, let's see. Helter Skelter -Elevator Music? (invented heavy metal with this one) Come Together - Elevator Music? I am the Walrus- Elevator Musc? A day in the Life - Elevator Music? ...Yer Blues (where the Bealtles smoked the Stones at their own game?) I could go on, but you get the point.
Oh, my god. It`s too bad that they didn`t record this show cause they were great. Paul was in top form vocally. I`ve never heard him sing better, and their version of "Yesterday" is fantastic!!
Fuck, all these years I've been doing it wrong. Instead of commenting on music I like, I'm supposed to look up bands I don't like, and then argue with the fans on those videos. Obviously.
Well, other posters, see the rabid insanity I provoked when I simply suggested the Rolling Stones were more directly influenced by black music, and their forceful lyrics were more representative of the political and social upheaval of the 60's than the Beatles 'don't worry, be happy' viewpoint? Be careful about expressing your own thoughts on youtube, alot of crazies waiting to target you.
@steveconn your the crazy nutcase. you post crappy videos and show false credits you just type in at the end of them. Thanks to Columbia Pictures was in one. Looser, Columbia Pictures would not give a retard like U the time of day. You call yourself "Binkconn Productions". Not a single hit on google. All U seem to have is a bunch of crappy videos on youtube wasting youtube space
Revolution is more political than any stones song will ever be, and more raunchy.
At a party for the beggars banquet album (release party) the album was playing all evening long, then paul arrived having with him an early pressing of their new single, revolution/hey jude and well, you can bet nobody that evening/night ever asked again about hearing the new stones album.
@OropherThranduil Yeah, "Count Me Out." Revolution was the Beatles betraying the anti-war movement and sucking the cock of their white suburban base, as usual.
being a huge diehard BEATLES fan, i can dialog about this final show for days! i've already left almost a dozen comments about this final show because IT'S VERY HISTORIC!!!! growing up in the inner city/hood/ghetto, i was picked on sometimes for listening to beatles music. i love my soul/r&b/early hip-hop but i would play beatles music privately on my own. if you look at them throughout the 60's they changed in every way. but you also see what happens if you work hard and NEVER give up!
You try to praise the inventors of human expression and disparage those who didn't, and it still does not please the masters of the doctrine. Why, Lord, Why?
And yea, after an apprenticeship wearing matching suits with ties in the gutter clubs of Hamburg, THE FOUR decided to take the larger world stage with a brasher look, damn the consequences, and don black leather jackets. THE FOUR cared not if their look was threatening to mainstream suburban families, or if it cost them record sales. Appealing to suburban families was the farthest from their mind.Leave that to suburb-pandering Stones, and their crystalline harmonized version of the blues.AMEN.
@steveconn Funny that when the Beatles were in their suits, so were the Stones LOL Take a gander at their early record covers and vids. Fact is, they followed the Beatles every damn step of the way. Best thing that ever happened to the Stones was when the Beatles broke up, forcing Mick and the boys to find their own way for once. Ah well, they could only ride the Beatles coat-tails for so long, right?
Oh, truly brother Reason, I remember every crude copy the Stones did of THE FOUR; The slow blues covers;The marimba and dulcimer THE FOUR played...somewhere, turning up on the Aftermath album. The dueling folk guitars THE FOUR played...somewhere, turning up on Sittin' On A Fence; the thoughtful & excited piano of Ruby Tuesday/Spend The Night turning up in reverse on many McCartney ballads from '68 on, just as a clever display of THE FOUR'S power. One cloned the other.AH-AH-ME-EN.
@steveconn You got it bro, they copied the Beales all the way until the Beatles broke up. As John said, "They were always interested in what 'The Beatles' are up to". Truly, the Stones are followers, the Beatles: leaders.
That's right. The Afro-Samba sound of THE FOUR on that one song (which one?)which the Stones copied on Sympathy. That Honky Tonk Women song THE FOUR had a #1 with; strict copycats.And John was no way motivated by the fact he had thrown away his own band to make albums with his no-talent girlfriend while the Stones stayed together to continue to thrive. John was above petty human emotions like insecurity or jealousy, being one of the inventors of music, THE FOUR. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EN
@steveconn If by petty human emotion you mean love then yes, John did succumb to it. The Beatles moved on to make several nice albums. The Stones stayed together out of necessity. No one else would put up with them for any length of time. Oh, and nice class act move on the Stones part, joining Brian Jones band, kicking him out, and pushing him to suicide. Mick and Keith.....class act those two.
And yea, Brian Jones possessed no bipolar tendencies, did not start screwing up onstage, did not beat his woman enough to make her leave him for Keith, and ingest enough brandy and LSD to erase his musical skills and make him useless to the band. This was all the work of, you guessed it, the Stones, when they weren't busy planning the assasinations of John Kennedy, his brother, and Martin Luther Kind. No wonder they sang about the Devil. Bless THE FOUR. AH-AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
@steveconn What a fine class act Keith was to snatch up Brian's ex. That's a real good buddy for ya, taking your ex. A real man would have told her sorry and stuck by and HELPED his friend. But no, Mick and Keith were glad to watch the band's founder spiral downward and die, leaving all the glory for them. What a class act those fella's are. THAT is your stones for you.
Yes, Keith held Brian's arms and made him hit Anita; then they personally poured the Brandy and Horse tranquilizer down his throat, all while trying to run a band and get their money from thieving Allen Klein. What energy those boys had! Why not learn support lessons from Lennon, who helpfully sang "you're a rich fag Jew" to Brian Epstein during Baby You're a Rich Man, and told him off in the studio, hastening his suicide. THE FOUR, infinite, immaculate generosity. AH-AH-ME--EHN
@steveconn Wow, all you can ever do is set up straw men and then knock them down. You are terrible at debate. No one ever claimed Keith made Brian hit his girlfriend or take drugs. But Keith was right their to snatch her up when the time came. What an awesome buddy Keith was to Brian for that. And Mick and Keith, kicking Brian out of his own band, those guys are such awesome friends. I wish you had friends like that. :-)
Yes, Anita played no part in running to Keith; he simply stole her away from him while she begged and screamed to be returned to Brian's violent arms; if only he'd been a true buddy and held Anita's arms while Brian boxed her senseless. What a bastard! And Brian's drug convinctions in no way stood in the way of the Stones ability to return to touring and being a functioning band. They just fired him for no reason at all. Reason's immaculate wisdom triumphs again. AH-AH-AH-MEH-EN.
@steveconn Oh, she of course played a part. But Keith, being the stand up guy he is, told her it would be inappropriate. Wait, no he didn't. He gave her a good old Stones shag. And then you continue with another set of strawmen, Keith holding Anita for Brian to beat her, blah, blah, blah. Please learn how to debate, these strawmen are tedious. But WAIT!! I thought it was those rebel Stones drug convictions that made them so cool? But now you say they fire Jones for drug use. What's up?
Ah, Reason uses the term "strawmen" whenever the debater's hyperbole exposes how ludicrous his stance is. Got it. Anyway, no, putting words in my mouth won't help you here. They didn't fire him for drug use; they fired him because his continued convinctions, unlike theirs, made it impossible for them to tour as an actual band (unlike the on life-support studio husk known as THE FOUR) with him onboard. Simple necessity, sad to say.
@steveconn I use hyperbole when YOU exaggerate and the term strawmen when you try to claim I exaggerate. Sooo, Brian's convictions were an impediment to their touring yet, as you claim, Mick et. al's convictions showed how they were such cool rebels. Should Brian have checked his planner and synched convictions with them? As he was the founder seems to me they should have checked with him. Least they could have done is change the name, but then, there was all that money. Hmmmmm Good buds
@steveconned: That you are a racist and cultural imperialist is now an established fact. You claim that it was not African-Americans who invented "rebel rock," but rather the English suburban white boys, one of whom, the Mick Jag-off, was a student at the elite LSE. Your entire oeuvre of bullshit consists of the straw man, post hoc ergo hoc, ignoracio elenchi logical fallacies, and cultural colonialism, ageism, and misogyny. Time for your 20th nervous breakdown, hypocrite.
@steveconned: How laughable were the Rolling Drones? As Browning put it, Let me count the ways: HORRIBLE guitar solos from both Wood and Richards (Harrison annihilated both of them even on his troubled solo tour in '74). And then there was the ultimate in Yuppie minstrelsy: Micky Jag-off, student of the elite LSE dressed in several thousand dollars of Versace's Wall Street clubbing crap singing, get this, "Street Fighting Fake."LAUGHABLE!! Check it for yourselves, everyone. It is a real hoot.
@steveconned: you have long proved your lack of education. "Straw man" is not synonymous with hypberbolé. The strawman logical fallacy is an imaginary/contrived oppositional argument set up only to be too easily riposted. An example of the straw man: your attempt to cast the Beatles as "middle-of-the-road" because they wore suits. But this, of course, ignores the political threat the Beatles were in song, protest, and deeds. Hypocrisy and racism: you are a Drones fan.
@Yellyist Paul is just some schmaltzy cocktail lounge piano balladeer pretending to be a rocker. Should have gotten a job at the Carlyle saying 'Thank you, you're too kind' as hotel guests filled his tip jar.
@steveconn Haha yeah right. Maybe you should switch on your hearing aid? He is a fucking genius, and a fantastic musician! Paul McCartney is an icon. There will NEVER be another Paul McCartney! Nor will there be another John Lennon. I`m a huge Rolling Stones fan and i`ve seen both Paul and Stones live. They`re unique.
he's a miserable motherfucker whose only sense in life is to bash on the greatest band of all time. (really, i saw him on other vids years ago doing exactly the same thing).
@OropherThranduil Well, i don`t take him seriously. He dismissed Paul McCartney as a worthless piece of shit. I don`t take people like that seriously, cause Paul McCartney is the greatest songwriter that has ever lived, along with John Lennon of course. And he`s a fucking great singer and musician too. Listen to his voice on "Yesterday" It`s live, and he didn`t hear a damn word cause of the screaming, and he sang like an angel! Paul`s my main beatle. I love John too, but Paul is my man!
@OropherThranduil I forgot to mention George. He was a great songwriter and a wonderful guitarist. I love his debut album. It`s my favorite post-beatles album by any of the Beatles. I`m not a huge fan of Ringo though. I think he`s a mediocre drummer even though he played well on a couple songs like "Rain" for instans. Pauls bass on "Rain" is magical, btw.
Except for the Ringo statement we afree, but Ringos unique and imaginative drum patterns were as imporntant to each song as Pauls bassline, what would come together be without ringo, that groove, from i saw her standing there over rain, i just can't name one drum performance of ringo i don't love.
ImO the most underrated drummer of all time.
but Keith Moon didn't ask him to drum on his album without a reason, just like he drummed on all other beatles solo albums once in a while.
@OropherThranduil i don`t like Ringo`s drumming on many tracks. I`m no fan of Ringo. He`s the only beatle i don`t like. He doesn`t even sign any autographs anymore. i think Charlie Watts is a good drummer. I like him a lot. He and Bill Wyman was a good team. But, that`s my opinion.
i like charlie too, but he never produced a beat that i found special, and wyman on bass is as basic as you could be in the 60s.
he doesn't sing autographs because a lot of them show up on ebay, and paul didn't sing stuff since the late 60s for christs sake, just like about ALL of them don't sign send items, ringo did for many years, much more and longer than most others.
you say that ringo doesn't sign stuff anymore that's send to him like it#s the most normal thing for celebs to do, while 99,9 % don't do it, he was very rare in that aspect.
try to send paul something to sign and you'll see.
@OropherThrandui He does not sign autographs period. He refuses to sign autographs for people he meets on the street etc. Paul signs autographs and he always will. But that`s not important. I don`t like ringo, I think he`s a mediocre drummer, and nothing you say or do will make me change my mind about that. I don`t like his style. I like John, Paul and George. They were the beatles for me. And the Beatles are my no.1 band. There will never be anyone like them again. They`re fantastic!
well, ringo was the glue that held the beatles together for so long, that's the reason why after the break-up he was the only one on friendly terms with all the others, without his drumming the beatles wouldn't have become what they did.
he was as importnant as the other 3 and his drumming is appreciated by others ranging from phil collins over dave grohl to steve weinberg, i don't think you are a drummer or you would know what ringo had.
@OropherThranduil Everything is debatable. John Lennon and Paul McCartney were the beatles in my view. They wrote the hits, and made them what they are today. George contributed too, but Paul and John was the main members. Their songwriting skills is amazing. There is no one better. Ringo`s drumming had nothing do to with the beatles success. It was John and Pauls songwriting skills that did it for the beatles.
When paul was asked who his favorite drummer to work with was (around the late 90s) he still said ringo, just like john said ringo always knew exactly what he wanted, they all appreciated ringos talent to make every drum pattern uniqie and identifiable just by themselfes.
Paul and Ringo are my alltime favoirte rythm section.
@OropherThranduil I love Pauls bass, but Ringo isn`t a great drummer in my opinion. He plays well on a couple beatle songs like "Rain" and "She loves you" His style is too safe and the sound is too soft. I like hard hitting drummers. He`s a capable drummer, but i don`t like his style. He was better on their first records. He plays well on early songs like "She loves you" "I saw her standing there" and "i want to hold your hand"
charlie watts was a safe drummer, in 50 years that guy created probably 3 remarkable drum tracks.
ringo created a uniqe drum pattern for every song, his fills are reagrded as some of the most musical and imaginative of all time, all the great drummers appreciate him, and he could hit hard like on helter skelter or during their early club days and later live concerts Take every long tal sally for example).
by the way saw paul in 2009 2 times, at the first of those concerts i was first row standing right before him, 3 hour set bith times, he played 5 instrumetns during the concert, and it was the first tour where he played both day tripper and obladi -oblada.
@OropherThranduil I`ve only seen him once, and i was right in front of the stage. I had eye contact with him several times.. He was FANTASTIC. His voice was great, and he played a lot of instruments. I don`t like his current band. I loved the band he had in the early ninetees. They were the best. I`ve seen Rolling Stones and Elton John live too.
@Yellyist It's not how how many instruments you play, it's WHAT you play, and 95% of what Paul put out was cutesy schmaltz and weak, polite lyrics, with a couple "look, I can be hard too" songs like Helter Skelter. The guy basically invented the sound of Barney the Dinosaur, Romper Room, and Sesame Street. Play the guitar and that piano all you like Paul - your nuts are still cut off.
@steveconn we do not agree on Paul McCartney, but that`s fair. We agree on the Rolling Stones cause i love them. i love Paul McCartney. He`s a genius in my opinion. I love his music, and he was the best beatle in my view. Let`s agree to disagree!
@steveconn I would like to see you write a song like yesterday, and sing it as well as Paul does in this fantastic clip. I`m a huge Rolling Stones fan, but none of the members of the Rolling Stones can touch Paul McCartney and John Lennon as singers, songwriters or musicians. And that`s why the Beatles sold 1 billion records, while the Rolling Stones only sold 200 million. People prefer quality!
@Yellyist No, people like safe, middle-of-the-road muzak that can be played on supermarket and dentist office intercoms, and that's why the Beatles' largely safe, neutered mainstream-pandering music is so popular. The Stones weren't interested in appealing to every mom, pop, granny, and puppy in the suburbs; they're about the darker, more interesting edges to society and behavior. That's why they sold less than the Beatles, and that's what makes their music so much more urgent, vital and alive.
@steveconn As if "I am the walrus" or "tomorrow never knows" are middle of the road muzak?? You don`t have a clue. What about "Ruby tuesday" and "As tears goes by" That`s Stones doing middle of the road muzak in my book, so i guess they were all guilty. And i love those songs. "Yesterday" is a beautiful song, and it has great lyrics. Again, come on. If you think Paul is a worthless piece of shit. Write something better. I would love to see you sing better, write better and play better than Paul
@Yellyist The Stones did 90% percent raw, balls out rock, 10% cutesy ballads and polite, inoffensive songs. The Beatles did the opposite. That is why the Stones express the reality of life for adults while the Beatles are for ivory-tower, airy fairy sensibilities. John's sterile drugged-out songs didn't offend anybody. They're just self-absorbed. Barry Manilow, Hanson, and Wayne Newton can also sing and play better than me; that doesn't mean their music isn't weak cornbread pop for the masses.
@steveconn I was wrong about you. I thought you were a beatles fan that didn`t like Paul since you trash talked him. But it seemes to me that you don`t like the beatles at all. So why the hell are you watching a beatles video on youtube if you hate the music? I thought you liked the music. I don`t watch bands that i don`t like. God, i have other things to do.
@steveconn I love the Stones, and i saw them live a couple of years ago. Keith is my man in the Stones. Mick is ok, but he sold out when he got knighted, but! They haven`t really produced anything great since Exile on Main St. There have been some moments here and there,but it`s almost 40 years ago since they released a really great album. "emotional rescue" and "fool to cry" are even worse than the worst of Wings. Paul McCartney`s "Band on the run" album is better than any of Stones 70`s albums
@Yellyist Actually Goat's Head Soup, Black and Blue, Some Girls, Tattoo You, parts of Undercover, Voodoo Lounge and a Bigger Bang are great albums. Emotional Rescue's been playing in my car for weeks - just a fun, enjoyable album, no twenty thousand overdubs, multiple tape loops and cutesy lyrics required. The Stones are just music embodied, not some act endlessly trapped in its 60's image and reputation. Glad you like Paul's stuff - perfect suburban music: happy, bland, and inoffensive. Enjoy.
@steveconn Goats head soup has three really good songs, Star star,Heartbreaker and Angie. I`m sure you hate Angie since it sounds like something Paul could have written, but i love it.Emotional rescue is a horrible track. That`s Mick of course. He wanted the Stones to do disco in the late 70`s.I think Keith is the heart and soul of the Stones. He wants to stick to rock and roll, while Mick wants to be modern.Fool to cry is shit too. I can`t stand that song. Silly love songs is a classic compared
@Yellyist A Hundred Years Ago, Coming Down Again,and Winter are also great tracks and Angie escapes chipmunk Paul's influence thanks to the rocky drums and not sounding like its in need of an insulin injection.Emotional Rescue is a sexy, Prince-influenced track that was a huge hit on black radio. Of course sexy and black are two things the loveable mop tops & their whitebread fans can't handle, so I see your dislike of it & Fool To Cry. Anyone who likes Manilowesque Silly Love Songs is lost.
@steveconn Silly love songs was a HUGE hit. Well, i see you like Micks crap, cause Emotinal rescue and fool to cry has nothing to do with the Rolling stones. It`s Mick trying to be commercial. I know that Keith hates those songs. I`m reading his book now, and he talks about his differences with Mick on music, and that he allowed Mick to pollute the Rolling Stones with crap music in the late 70`s. Mick is a great frontman, but Keith is the heart and soul of the Rolling Stones!
@steveconn "Silly love songs" is a great pop song, and highly underrated. It was the biggest selling single in the world in 1976, and the live version on "Wings over Amercia" proves how brilliant the song really is. I`m not gonna do a Rolling Stones vs Beatles debate with you, cause i think it`s rubbish. I love both bands.Rolling Stones is just as important for me as it is for you.To bad you don`t like the Bealtes, but that`s your loss.I`ve seen The Stones live.I was right in front of the stage!
@Yellyist Paul and the Beatles are like the McDonald's of pop music. Billions and billions served with smiley fun happy meals. If that's what you think music should be, cool. I just prefer that which isn't afraid of its black roots and doesn't water them down into non-existence so that all the white listeners are happy.
@steveconn The Beatles did a lot of motown numbers, and they did Little Richard and Chuck Berry songs like "long tall Sally" and "Rock and roll music" I don`t have to make the case for the Beatles. Songs like "Yesterday" "Eleanor Rigby" "Here, there and everywhere" "Let it be" "Hey Jude" "Strawberry fields forever" "Penny Lane" Blackbird" "The fool on the hill" "Julia" "Help" "Something" "While my guitar gently weeps" etc etc will live on forever cause they`re classics!
@Yellyist But they watered down all those black numbers with their chipmunk harmonies so that the soul in them became pointless; the Stones weren't afraid of putting the black grit of their covers up front. All those numbers you mentioned except for Fields, Julia, Help, and the Harrison songs are just Paul elevator music: harmless, cute and dull the way the suburbs likes it, though George got pretty close with his yuppie effort Something. Julia and Fields is John slowly circling his navel. Yay.
@Yellyist There`s in no harnomies on "Long tall Sally" or Rock and Roll music" The songs i mentioned are the ones i consider to the best beatles songs. I like ballads, and i`m not too keen on black music. Soul and motown is my cup of tea. I like pop and rock and roll. i think songs like "Helter skelter" "Back in the USSR" "Get back" "I`m down" "I saw her standing there" "Jet" "Hi Hi Hi" are brilliant examples of Pauls ability to write good rock songs! John too. He wrote "Revolution"
The McDonalds of Pop Music? Get your head out of your arse. Absurd. Rubber Soul, Magical Mystery Tour, Revolver, Sgt Pepper, White Album, Abbey Road, all contained far more inventive music than anything The Stones ever did....lyrics, instrumentation, vocals, musicianship,arrangements, not even close. Stones = overrated garage band. Beatles = a band for the ages. 300 years from now, they'll be thought of as the classics like Mozart and Beetohven are today....
@Henryep10 They went from a cutesy boyband to overproduced, sterile elevator muzak. Whoopee. At least the Stones sound like real people playing real instruments, not machines talking to eachother
(and they wrote about the times around them -"who killed the Kennedys?"- instead of offering ivory-tower yuppie bullshit -"it's gonna be alright.")
And yea, the first negro rock n' roll records were transmitted to England, but yea as the scripture tells us they were only transmitted to four radios in the entire country, and allowed to inspire only FOUR, the GODLIKE FOUR. From 1955 until 1962,THE FOUR shaped this material, took out the rougher negro timbers, and created the only defintion of youth music ever to exist. Once their message was complete,they allowed a few lesser musicians to hear the original negroes, and to imitate.AH-AH-MEH-EN
@steveconn And yet more BS for the stenchhole that is your mind. I assume you mean "negroe" timbre you racist ass (unless there is some kind of wood exclusive to the black community). The graceful thing for you to do here is accept you lost (twice) and leave. Why come back after you said you were done? Can't stand to not have the last word? Your best bet to have any sympathy for your views would be to die.
Yea, Reason finds yet another 'reason' (ha, how appropriate) to disparage my pitiful soul. Bless him for his immaculate steadiness. He has caught me mispelling negro. Please, Reason, let me drop to my knees and genuflect for your forgiveness.I only meant it in reference to the negro-imitating, child-raping, slavery upholding Republican mascots the Stones, to explicate further the complete invention of music by THE FOUR and all others as mere dust. Please forgive, Reason, forgive.
@steveconn Jesus, you really are the dumbest child I have ever had the displeasure of talking to. I was correcting your spelling of timbre, which you spelled timber. Man, if you can't keep up then maybe it is time you shut up. Do you need a coloring book to help you out?
@steveconn Jesus, you really are the dumbest child I have ever had the displeasure of talking to. I was correcting your spelling of timbre, which you spelled timber. Man, if you can't keep up then maybe it is time you shut up. Do you need a coloring book to help you out?
And, yea, some unsmiling negro musicians in America's south plucked some chords, sang in a deep guttaral sound, and made a few pennies. Then some negro wannabes in England listened to their records, attempted to imitate the guttural sounds, and make even more pennies. But all, all were simply obliterated into dust by the arrival of THE FOUR, who taught them that music at its highest is presented with lovely chiming harmonies and smiles for all. Goodbye guttural sounds. Hello bliss. AH-AH-MEH-EN
Why wasn't I there to take a stand when the Stones returned the negroes of the world to shackles of slavery? Why wasn't I there to prevent them from repealing women's voting rights?
Why wasn't I there when they colluded with Karl Rove in '04 to fix the voting machines in Ohio, returning Bush to office? Why wasn't I there to shout down the blasphemer who said THE FOUR lived in great mansions and townhouses, and didn't live in semi-detached squalid homes in London? I have been weak,Lord,too weak.
@steveconn Yes, you DO attack the Beatles with the ass-headed ironic hyperbole. Neither Jaime nor myself said they invented music nor the rest of the exaggerated claims you make. The fact that the Stones are the favored group of the Right does not lead to the ridiculous hyperbole you are trying to place in Jaime's or my mouth. Bottom line is this: the Stone's were, are, and always will be seen as the band that followed the Beatles, the band that is 2nd to the Beatles. No Beatles = No Stones
Forgive me, my liege, I cannot comprehend yours and Jaime's infinite wisdom. I am only a lowly interpreter of THE FOUR. I forgot they turned on the radio to allow a young Keith Richards to hear Chuck Berry for the first time, gave a teen Mick Jagger his first blues records and gave him permission to perform for his family and then at Alexis Korner's blues gatherings in London, that they paid large crowds to show up at the early Stones shows at the Richmond Hotel. Forgive me. AMEN
@steveconn Those aren't the only things you fail to comprehend. I agree, you are indeed lowly. Then you continue on with your insulting irony. No, the Beatles never did any of those items you sarcastically state above. What they DID do however was write their first charting song to hit the top 20. Why oh why did your wonderful Stones need the Beatles to write a song for them? If not for the Beatles to open the door AND write a hit for them, the Stones remain a London local act.
And yea, Reason stoops to correct my ignorance yet again,praise his soul.Why indeed did the Stones need THE FOUR to write songs for them,when their own covers of negro blues songs were so much more popular with whitebread UK audiences than THE FOUR'S angry songs about holding hands and loving them do?Those sweet Delta blues songs were always taken to the bosom of the UK public over the raw and ruthless songs of THE FOUR.Reason asks a good question;it remains a mystery to this day
@steveconn Are you trying to insinuate that the Stones were more popular than the Beatles? Maybe I am misunderstanding you through all your BS irony, hyperbole, and sarcasm, but if that IS what you are trying to insinuate you are truly brain dead. The Stones were never more popular or more well known than the Beatles. Another item worth noting, the Stones were in a MUCH larger population center (London) then the Beatles (Liverpool & Hamburg).
No, no, no, Reason, I would never suggest the Stones were more popular, despite catering to the mainstream by wearing matching suits for most of the 60's and basing their material on sweetly harmonized pop songs, while THE FOUR said fuck it, wore leather jackets on Ed Sullivan and never smiled for their audiences.Somehow, despite this daring strategy, THE FOUR still managed to capture the hearts of the mainstream public and sell the most records. Those daring rebel FOUR. AH-ME-EN
@steveconn And again I say (try to answer it if you can), if the Stones were such bad boys then why aren't you a fan of some real rebellious bands like the Sex Pistols, Metallica, Guns and Roses? See, in your mind, the Beatles are pussies while Zeppelin, Metallica, etc. are all Cro-magnons. Are the stones just that perfect blend for you? Just the right amount of pussiness AND stupidity? I do agree with you on that. And the Beatles wrote about MUCH more than love you wanker.
Again, your wisdom is beyond Godlike, Reason. As children, the Sex Pistols, Metallica, Guns & Roses watched their televisions and saw the sneering, leather-jacketed FOUR tear up the set of the Ed Sullivan show and said, "That is how I want to Rock N' Roll. Pander to no one; outrage everything." How the Stones polite, meek suburban-pandering pop ever figured into their evolution is one of the great mysteries, like Amelia Earhardt and the Lochness Monster. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EN.
@steveconn Oh, and the Beatles did in fact go through a leather jacket phase in Germany but, as you like to say, you eventually grow up. And they did in fact move on past that phase. Unlike you who can't get past this. Really, you should not invest so much of your self-esteem in the Stones. Your insecurities are clearly showing.
How many times, divine soul, must I corroborate yours and jaime's faultless wisdom? I invest no self-esteem in the Stones. I have followed the Gospel of Jaime that the Stones are Republican-supporting, negro and women enslaving, greedy wannabes, who even failed at wearing the iconoclastic matching suits of THE FOUR as the 60's progressed. I do my best to trod thy path, but it is a difficult road for one so lacking in thine divinity, Reason. Forgive me. Forgive me. AH-AH-ME-EN.
Yes, the Stones promote Republicanism, slavery and woman-hating with music that does not excite the pulse and make one want to move, while THE FOUR's creamy white harmonies, inert stage presence, and bland songs of peace and harmony are the essence of Rock N' Roll. Did I not make this clear, Godly one?
In the way that Perry Como albums rock, the Beatles rock. If you consider that admission a victory, than I hope your insurance covers your coma-like state and listening tastes. Good luck.
@steveconn No no, I mean the Stones suck and the Beatles rock. Isn't that what you are saying in all your posts earlier which are attempts at ironic hyperbole? The Stones suck and the Beatles are great. Yes or no?
No, in reality the Beatles are middle-of-the-road, family friendly whitebread sell-outs with a few hard songs buried on the White Album while the Stones even in their earliest records are the birth cry of modern rebel Rock. And that's the final statement of truth
(except for your last pathetic delusionary comment to follow mine. Bye.)
@steveconn If by "birth cry of modern rebel rock" you mean sub-par blues cover band then right you are. On their 1st 3 albums, 26 of the 36 songs were covers. And THAT is the truth for you SteveO. You live in a fantasy world where the Stones changed rock and the Beatles did nothing. I (and 600 million to 1 billion other people) beg to differ. Without the Beatles there are no Stones. The Stones are secondary (at best) to the Beatles. The Beatles influence on the Stones is undeniable.
@steveconn Oh, and thank you Steve for showing your intelligence yet again by stating that Lennon sang "rich fag jew". Show me your credible source for this. You see, this is called a RUMOR and perhaps you should look up your facts. Now Lennon did suggest, jokingly, that Epstein could call his autobiography "Queer Jew". So, nice try fool. Now run along and go review a movie.
RollingOreo@steveconned:, Eve/RollingOreo/Steveconned, please do explain why the Drones are all wearing the "middle-of-the-road" matching suits in the following album covers: Aftermath; Golden Album Pic Disc; Paint it Black; The Rolling Drones; Slow Rollers (I'll say), etc., etc.
@steveconned/RolandOreo: More of steve's racist bullshit. He claims the Drones are the "birth of modern rebel rock." Well, talk about cultural genocide: according to steveconned, the BLACK inventors of rock never existed. No Chuck Berry, Ike Turner, James Brown, the Isley Bros: The "final statement of truth" is right here in steveconned's own words. And they prove conclusively what an insufferably hypocritical racist and cultural imperialist poseur he is. So are the Drones.
I watched the Rolling Drones 1990 concerts on PBS yesterday. THEY SUCKED!!!!! This tape of the Beatles from 1966 features a tighter, more musically adept band than the Drones could achieve even some twenty-four years to practice. The low points? SYMPATHY FOR BULLSHIT. HORRIBLE!!! Richard's solo was laughably bad, Wyman's one-note run-down of a song that descends from E to D major like poop from a pig? RISIBLE. And it just got worse. FACT.
That's why i always say Keith was the best bassplayer in the band, he played on sympathy for the Devil, Jumping jack Flash and some others, but those 2 alone take him over anything wyman ever played.
Steveconned/RolandOreo: As one given to mental meltdowns on the world wide web, ludicrous claims about the Rolling Drones, and outright claims drenched in racism, ageism, misogyny, and outright stupidity, you have demonstrated a piquant penchant for the excrement of horses and bulls. As to claims about auto-acclaim, given your demonstrable resort for auto-"satisfactions," you ought not give further fuel to those who already consider you laughable, at best.
@jaimeguitar50 hey Blankfrack, we know you like sticking candlesticks up your paraplegic butthole. But it will not stop your broken bowels from shitting yourself you stupid legless fuck !
@RolandOreo/Steveconned: Care to comment on the Rolling Drones wearing matching "middle-of-the-road" suits on over five albums? Care to comment on your racist claim that African-Americans did not invent "rebel rock"? Care to comment on the Rolling Drones HORRIBLE performance in 1990, one that the Beatles shredded in 1966? Care to comment on Versace-clad Mick Jag-off crooning "Street Fighting Fake?" Yeah. I thought so, mdme "horse shit" steveconned.
@steveconned: A "few hard songs?" Well, given that you believe that the Rolling Drones, and not African-American artists such as Chuck Berry or James Brown invented "rebel rock," we can dismiss your idiocies as (1) homo-erotic fixation with the Drones (2) racist drivel (3) musical illiteracy, as the Beatles' Day Tripper alone obliterates the rinky-tink of "Satisfaction." the Drones never did matched the seething Paperback Writer, the funk of Taxman, let alone the wallop of the White Album.
@jaimeguitar50 ROFL He isn't going to come back, at least not in the Steveconned/RollingOreo incarnations. I wince to say it but, that squirmin' dog knows he's just had his day. LOL It's so sad that he not only had to have all of his logical fallacies pointed out to him, but then had to have them all defined for him. Pretty much what I expected from a guy whose life model is another man who walks about on stage like a chicken with epilepsy.
@Reason4U2Die: Great work, my friend, and a shout out to the hilarious steve cocked as well. Steveconned/Rolling Oreo "can't git no satisfaction," having run into the wall of facts, evidence, and truth. Mickey Jag ain't no James Brown---or Prince, for that matter. And the Rolling Drones never were and never will be as musically adept, politically significant, and culturally liberating as the Beatles.
Whoa! I...I... think I hear steve bawling again! Steve: We Don't need no Wah Wah!
@steveconn LMAO, you had to take 20 minutes time out to log onto your RollingOrmund account to make a comment on the "Beatles Revolution #4" video. Man you are pathetic? Why not just post as Steveconn? God damn your life must be boring LOL
Thank you for following me around youtube, oh blessed Reason. You truly display no stalker tendencies but only divine generosity by correcting my most humble faults. Thank you again, celestial one.
@steveconn Only trying to help :) You pick a fight, you get a fight. Deal with it :-) Your comments on that vid are as pointless as the ones here. Why are you so threatened by the Beatles? Is it because deep down you really truly know they surpass the stones in everyway. My guess is yes. You hate hearing how so many people love the Beatles and you wished they were like you and loved the Stones. You're like those religious junkies trying to "save" everyone LOL sad, sad, Stephen Conn
And yea, who is more moronic, the poster, or the one who bothers to stalk him? Why do Ieven ask a question when his grace Reason knows the answer; he knows that, despite the sloppily-produced, angry sounding songs THE FOUR based their reputation on, they would somehow, SOMEHOW, manage to be loved by every mom, pop, son, daughter, grannie, grandpa, cat, dog, puppy on the block.That we all desire to join this group and have no thoughts of our own, that THE FOUR define music. AMEN.
@steveconn In this case, you are the one who is more moronic. That has ben VERY well established. The Stones don't sound angry, they sound pathetic (but less pathetic then you). So what aspect of the Stones is most important to you? Their pussy assed sound or their cro-magnon level of vapidness?
That is right, nothing quite expresses anger like I Want To Hold Your Hand, Can't Buy Me Love, Or From Me To You. Those who believe these are the definition of outrage must of course know the definition of what sounds angry in a song, right immaculate Reason? AH-AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
@steveconn The Beatles expressed a much greater range of emotions through their songs than the Stones ever could. If they didn't spend as much time on anger as the Stones did it is because they, unlike you, realized there are a great deal more emotions to express. As for the Stones "attempt" to express anger....ROFL They just sound hopelessly horny and unsatiated. HEY! Maybe that's why Keith snagged Brian's girl.
Horny and unsatiated. Yes, some humans I have heard are actually like that. Not the eunuchs and virgins that buy records by THE FOUR, mind you, because they know in reality the world is run and conducted through peace, love, understanding, and drugged-out wannabe Dylan lyrics. Yea, THE FOUR, praise THE FOUR, so above us one wonders how they ever deigned to records sounds and thoughts for us mere horny and unsatiated humans. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
@steveconn "Horny and unsatiated. Yes, some humans I have heard are actually like that."
Yes, I am sure you have "heard" there are people like that. I'm sure that is the case, that you have "heard" this. Oh man, I need to thank you for that one. I actually am laughing so hard it brought a tear to my eye.
Is TheSteveCock not himself heaven sent, the richest parody of the hapless attempts of a follower of THE FOUR to present his beliefs in their most divine Godhood accurately. He who invented satire, The SteveCock, who invented laughter when the world knew not the concept (well, that is until John Lennon made a joke at the command performance for the Queen), he, who reminds us laughter is the only way to overcome the horror of an unadequately articulated follower of THE FOUR. AMEN.
Or was I perhaps too generous in granting the Stone even vocal chords to utter their guttaral sounds by which to record said sounds for the vile, petty purpose of actually selling records (which THE FOUR taught us is the last thing one should do). How could one even grant them this status, since THE FOUR created music and ipso facto by their divine grace they would never grant such suburban negro minstrels the power to spread their disease in the first place? An error in my interpretation. AMEN
Perhaps I did not quote from the scripture thorougly enough to jaime and Reason's satisfaction (NO!!! Did I say the word the negro "wannabes" used in their "song?" A thousand lashes for later. For it is written THE FOUR also brought to the human race the concepts of thinking, upright walking, food consumption, shelter building, and took Adam and Eve from the Garden and from them created the many ethic groups of the world (whose descendants they would marry as many of as they could).AH-AH-ME-EN
Lift your chin, negro, no longer need you fear the Stones and their rape of your women.
Stop smirking, blonde white women, your plan to take over the world with your Aryan might by marrying unsmiling fake negro minstrels shall not succeed.
For, THE FOUR have arrived, to take the hand of all negroes (and Asians, and Mexicans) and marry as many of them as time allows, and to send the cackling blonde Nazi women back to the pits of hell. THE FOUR, THE FOUR, and let us sing: AH-AH-AH-ME-EH-EH-EN.
@steveconn Damn, you are long winded in these post-meltdown ramblings of yours. What kinda of sad pathetic existence do you lead that you have nothing better to do then to post attempts at messianic irony regarding the Beatles? Don't you have a movie to review or something? You said a week ago you were done but you just keep going. Are you incapable of just moving on and leaving this thread? If you love the Stones so much why don't you just go enjoy some of their videos?
And yea, the morning word has come from Jaime's disciple down from the mount, worship of THE FOUR never quite reaching his expectations as his Holy Father Jaime doth preach. We must ponder this. We must ponder this. Is it not enough that the Stones are negro-wannabe, solely Republican mascots for the suburbs, seeking to turn back the clock on women's, ethnic rights, and environmental conditions for the earth, while THE FOUR invented music, peace, rebellion, love, and breathing?
@steveconn Typical Steve tactic: just continue on with the same asanine "church-speak" while at the same time avoiding every single point made by Jaime and myself. Still posts even though he said he was through. Still attacks the Beatles instead of just listening to the Stones. Still unable to let this thread go even after this, his 2nd meltdown (which I agree is just weird this time). Poor, sad, pathetic Stephen Conn.
Who attacks the Beatles, brother Reason? Do I not adequately preach the word of his holiness jaimeguitar, who has taught us the Beatles invented music, social acceptance, social rebellion, love, hate, highest record sales (while not wanting to sell records at all),acceptance by the mainstream, hatred from the mainstream,while the Stones were Republican mascot primates who cravenly sought to make money and not marry their black fans?You have taught me I must strive further.AH-MEN
Who attacks the Beatles, brother Reason? Do I not adequately preach the word of his holiness jaimeguitar, who has taught us the Beatles invented music, social acceptance, social rebellion, love, hate, highest record sales (while not wanting to sell records at all),acceptance by the mainstream, hatred from the mainstream,while the Stones were Republican mascot primates who cravenly sought to make money and not marry their black fans?You have taught me I must strive further.AH-MEN
Forgive me for my previous post, for I made an error (though his Lordship jaime will doubtless find many more beneath his most holy light): I referred to THE FOUR by their proper names, which is as sacriligeous an error as one can make for they who created the world.Tantamount to saying jaime's name in vain, it is an almost impardonable sin from which there can be no recovery.Perhaps if I donate some money to the "Fight the Right Wing/Anti-Suffrage/Fake Negro Stones" Fund, I might find peace
Why, God, why did you grant jaimeguitar50 this wisdom first? Why did he get to be your chosen? To know that John Lennon and Paul McCartney were the most iconoclastic, daring lyricists in the universe? That George Harrison was the most skilled guitarist ever to touch the instrument? That Ringo Starr's drumming was so divine as to teach the heart new rhythms by which to beat? Why, Lord, did you let the rest of us have other opinions when you already deemed him the wisest of all? The Lord is cruel.
Please sign this petition if you would like the word "Music" replaced by the word "Beatles" in the dictionary. But not "God." That word is to be replaced by the word "jaimeguitar50." And it is not a petition, it is simply the rule of law. Defy it, and you will confined to the suburbs, with wires forcing your face into a smile as the Rolling Stones sing mock negro songs to your deluded content. You will be warned only once. Good day.
And yea, the walking animal known as Mick Jagger, along with the drug-sodden sodomist known as Keith Richards, stepped into a studio one day to pitifully attempt to record some sounds. And at that moment, descending from the clouds, THE FOUR warned them to attempt no such futile gestures. "Do thy not know that we invented music, and rebellion, and peace, and cultural significance and lyrics and recording equipment? Do thy dare express thyself?" And the Stones evaporated. AH-AH-ME-EH-EH-EN
How, oh how, fellow citizens of the earth, can we teach jaime his Godhood? He refuses the mantle, disparages those who bestow it upon him, yet it is so obviously his that it would be a crime against the universe for him to turn it down. He, who has shown us the light of THE FOUR, who invented every form of ethnic music and gave it to the ethnicities of the world to use as they please; who married Asians and Mexicans not out of love but as a statement of Nationalistic pride;who are Gods like him?
And so it was written, as Jaime the blindingly wise Prophet doth preach, THE FOUR arrived on the shores of America and were spat on, and shunned, and tv screens went black the night they played Ed Sullivan, so iconoclastic and threatening were they to our suburban, wholesome way of life. And the Stones were taken to the bosom of the suburbs, by white families that loved the wholesome songs of Muddy Waters, and the Beatles were turned from hotels and the Stones loved everywhere.AH-AH-AH-ME-EH-EN
And yea, we know THE FOUR invented music, all music, all music that ever was, is, and will be, that there was a vast chasm of silence that enveloped the universe until they guided the first homo sapiens to concentrate their vocal chords into the first sounds, taught Mozart to write his first childhood symphonies, and taught the negro people how to express their sorrow in the slave fields.Then, one day when the Stones failed to marry their negro fans, THE FOUR offered betrothal instead.AH-AH-MEN
Godlike, Godlike, Godlike; too small a word for the perfection of jaime, an insult to his celestial, immaculate beauty of soul. Legend tells us he was once a mortal, as fallible as the rest of us, until the divine kiss of the inventors of music, THE FOUR, transformed him irrevocably into something else, a soothsayer and prophet to raise the rest of us from the muck. We saw the pretend negroes who bent bluesmen, the elderly, and children over to rape them, and said "ENOUGH!" Let there be jaime.
@RollingOrmond Steve, are you really too much of a wimp to post on here with your Steveconn account? You obviously have an OCD as demonstrated by your absolute need to have the last word, but you are truly a coward if you can't come back as Steveconn and do this. Such a sad, pathetic "man".
What, does his holiness' disciple Reason request my humble presence to learn further the ways of THE FOUR? A thousand apologies, your wisdom, I was at a Rolling Stones deprogramming camp, where I was learning the full extent of their activities in aiding Taliban forces in Afghanistan, planting roadside bombs in Iraq against departing U.S. soldiers, and plans to sabotage Democratic primaries in November. Again, a thousand, thousand apologies, your most holy, divine wisdom Reason.
Regarding your ongoing, interminable, and truly low-grade but utterly weird meltdown, Part Deux, you could stand to attain a bit of "Reason." Your life would improve immensely, and so would your prose and postings, if you actually ever did attend a Rolling Drones' "deprogramming camp." As it is, you come across as a campy, mentally deprogrammed disciple of Dupery. Get a shrink, steve: the Rolling Drones are just not that good.
And lo, the messiah jaime came down yet again from his mount, to teach us confused rabble yet again the proper way to disparage the Stones, because being child-raping, Republican fundraising, human-rights repealing wannabe negroes is not insulting enough to the kind of putrid presence they lent to the earth. How, oh, how, will we ever please jaime? Please, if there is a divine creator in the universe, please, please show us the way to not insult jaime's immaculate perfection...
@steveconn Best way to not insult,Steve, is to stop posting your insults on every damn video. If you like the Stones so much why not just stay there and listen to them? Why the need to go to vids of the Beatles and insult them? Are you that threastened by The Beatle's? Are you actually well aware of the Stones inferiority to them and thus have to attack them? Anyway, here is your "divine" advice: STFU.
@jaimeguitar50 Jaime, want a great laugh? Go over to George Harrison This Song and check out our little classically trained pianist/violinist's musical knowledge at work. He claims that the tempo's of both songs are the same and that the TooLang section is the same as the Hare Hare section. This little "prodigy" doesn't even know the keys of the songs, the chords played in either, or even their tempo's. SteveCON, exposed yet again LOL
Wow. You have really gone far off the deep end. This is what happens when you surrender all faculties of independant thought to become a Dupe par excellence for so small a cause as, in your own words, the "pretend negroes": Micky Jagg-off and his Rolling Drones The only thing "Godlike" about your pretensions to parody is that, like God, there isn't evidence of it actually existing. As it is, your posts evoke nothing so much as, dare one say it, "white noise."
And yea, the sweet, innocent child was slowly devoured. The wannabe negro Wyman ate his legs; wannabe negro Watts ate his arms; the wannabe negro Richards ate his chest; and the wannabe negro Jagger ate his heart. But, lo, they could not devour his spirit, for the whitest, purest whitest white men already possessed that, to uplift, to guide, to partake of their everlasting, blindingly white perfection. These men were of course THE FOUR; jaime and Reason already knew their ways. The rest of us...
Um, earth to inane asylum Steve: What is this talk of the "rest of us?" Exactly how many voices do you hear in your head? And how long have you fixated over the Rolling Drones' manifest failure to ever match the Beatles in social/cultural significance, musical brilliance, and multicultural explorations? You, the Yuppie wannabe and seeker of all things of "blindingly white perfection," only find catastrophic self-immolation. But you return for more. Truly weird.
And John and Paul dove into the mob of screaming, pleading black women, each one beaten, each one molested in her own personal way by the creature known as Jagger. The demon Jagger promised to marry each one that he made love to on tour, but that was just a ruse to gain their trust, so that he might take their music and use it fund raise for Karl Rove and increase global warming and murder the elderly. But John & Paul married their voices, made a sweet golden harmony, and washed us clean. AMEN.
@RollingOreo/steveconned: Micky Jag-off "demon?" Oh, please. Even in your very failed attempt at parody, you reveal your laughable vicarious living via the laughable myth of Jag-off's "demonic" sympathies. The only thing "demonic" about Jag-off was his penchant for horrible, cringe-inducing minstrelsy, and the even more cringe-inducing spectacle of suburban dimwits such as yourself, whose idea of "jungle music" is the prat-like preenings of five twits of the suburban garden: the Rolling Drones.
What is it like being perfect? Not perfection in a mortal sense. I mean Godlike perfection, where the mere presence of the perfected sheds wisdom on all lucky enough to be in the perfected's presence? Only jaime can answer this question. Jaime and Jaime alone. How did he attain this immaculate level? Quite simple. He allowed the Heavenly voices of THE FOUR to lift him higher, ever higher still, beyond our reach, where mere listeners to negro-imitating Republicans could only dream to tread. A-MEN
"What is it like being" perfectly bat-guano insane and utterly boiled in the brain, eh, steve? Obviously, you will never get over your self-induced mental meltdown in front of thousands, perhaps tens of thousands. And now you treat your uneasy audience to the aftermath: steveconned's drooling, dripping, dread, the mutterings of the terminally defeated, whose total investment of his very, very white self in the Drones was all for naught. Read Camus. It might help...
Oh lord, if "I" randomly put "quotation" marks around "every" other "word," might I "attain" the grace "of" your apostle jaimeguitar"50"? Will I "be" able "to" preach the word "of" the FOUR enough to join his "ranks" of everlasting "perfection" and grace"?" Will the baffling "negro"-imitating (and promoters of greed through getting into the music business "to" make money rather "than" give it away like the FOUR) Stones "ever" free my "spirit?" Lord, show me the way to jaime's perfection.Show me
And he, Godlike Jaime of the random quotation mark, shall be so benevolent as to allow lesser mortals to type their thoughts on the everlasting holiness of THE FOUR, four young men who came from the land of Liverpool to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony,to shed everlasting light and wisdom so the rest of the world may someday attain an ounce of their grace.The environmental legislation-repealing,kindegarten-burning Stones shall never get there, but sing a none-negro song, and you might.
I saw a child beaten, then raped, then beaten again. No one answered his cry.
I saw an old woman wake up to find her pension fund wiped from her account.
Then she was repeatedly raped, beaten, and set on fire. No one answered her cry. I saw free black men and women suddenly returned to shackles. No one answered their cry. Until, finally, a man known as Paul, and another known as Ringo, left their homes, impoverished from decades of charity, and said "No more. The Stones must be stopped."Amen.
What is infinitely good and what is infinitely evil? The question has haunted mankind since the dawn of philosophy. But, yea, as it is written, the apostle jaimeguitar 50 has come down from the mountain, deigned to lower himself to our imbecilic level, and with his servant Reason teaches us what is iinfinitely good and pure:
Um, let's see. Helter Skelter -Elevator Music? (invented heavy metal with this one) Come Together - Elevator Music? I am the Walrus- Elevator Musc? A day in the Life - Elevator Music? ...Yer Blues (where the Bealtles smoked the Stones at their own game?) I could go on, but you get the point.
Henryep10 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steveconned pay no attention to jaimeguitar: he also goes by: Yossarian, MrAnusmaster and Blankfrack.
In reality he's an angry paraplegic who wear diapers and his only pleasure in life is arguing with people on the net.
I cannot blame him for his anger, in reality if i could not walk, fuck and had to wear diapers, I might be angry also !
CIapoIIa 8 months ago
Oh, my god. It`s too bad that they didn`t record this show cause they were great. Paul was in top form vocally. I`ve never heard him sing better, and their version of "Yesterday" is fantastic!!
Yellyist 9 months ago
John: "Thank you Ringo" Ringo "Thank you" John: "Thank you, lovely working with you" LOL!
njriley55 10 months ago
Fuck, all these years I've been doing it wrong. Instead of commenting on music I like, I'm supposed to look up bands I don't like, and then argue with the fans on those videos. Obviously.
Zebonka 1 year ago
@Zebonka yep, thats the more fun thing to do
MrBendorandoran 11 months ago
Hang on...I've just described my repulsive self!
For shame.
steveconnn 1 year ago 4
Well, other posters, see the rabid insanity I provoked when I simply suggested the Rolling Stones were more directly influenced by black music, and their forceful lyrics were more representative of the political and social upheaval of the 60's than the Beatles 'don't worry, be happy' viewpoint? Be careful about expressing your own thoughts on youtube, alot of crazies waiting to target you.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn your the crazy nutcase. you post crappy videos and show false credits you just type in at the end of them. Thanks to Columbia Pictures was in one. Looser, Columbia Pictures would not give a retard like U the time of day. You call yourself "Binkconn Productions". Not a single hit on google. All U seem to have is a bunch of crappy videos on youtube wasting youtube space
TARD
skjoyner 1 year ago 3
@skjoyner
Coming from some fifty-four year old failure who hasn't done jack squat with his life except stalk me around youtube, that really hurts lol.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn
Revolution is more political than any stones song will ever be, and more raunchy.
At a party for the beggars banquet album (release party) the album was playing all evening long, then paul arrived having with him an early pressing of their new single, revolution/hey jude and well, you can bet nobody that evening/night ever asked again about hearing the new stones album.
OropherThranduil 10 months ago
@OropherThranduil Yeah, "Count Me Out." Revolution was the Beatles betraying the anti-war movement and sucking the cock of their white suburban base, as usual.
steveconn 10 months ago
being a huge diehard BEATLES fan, i can dialog about this final show for days! i've already left almost a dozen comments about this final show because IT'S VERY HISTORIC!!!! growing up in the inner city/hood/ghetto, i was picked on sometimes for listening to beatles music. i love my soul/r&b/early hip-hop but i would play beatles music privately on my own. if you look at them throughout the 60's they changed in every way. but you also see what happens if you work hard and NEVER give up!
elwin38 1 year ago
Oh boy, oh boy. I do feel mightily queer.Just caught a glimpse of my handsome, Yid-faced reflection in the mirror....
Never knowing if I'm coming or going, no-one to give classicsal piano lessons, constant rejections, rapidly receding hairline.
Being on here spouting my wonderful and totally correct opinions, I feel like I'm in a Groundhog Day scenario.
Never been the same since my Mom's stroke.
AAAAAAAAA-RSOLE.
TheSteveCock 1 year ago 3
@TheSteveCock ROFL
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
You try to praise the inventors of human expression and disparage those who didn't, and it still does not please the masters of the doctrine. Why, Lord, Why?
steveconn 1 year ago
And yea, after an apprenticeship wearing matching suits with ties in the gutter clubs of Hamburg, THE FOUR decided to take the larger world stage with a brasher look, damn the consequences, and don black leather jackets. THE FOUR cared not if their look was threatening to mainstream suburban families, or if it cost them record sales. Appealing to suburban families was the farthest from their mind.Leave that to suburb-pandering Stones, and their crystalline harmonized version of the blues.AMEN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Funny that when the Beatles were in their suits, so were the Stones LOL Take a gander at their early record covers and vids. Fact is, they followed the Beatles every damn step of the way. Best thing that ever happened to the Stones was when the Beatles broke up, forcing Mick and the boys to find their own way for once. Ah well, they could only ride the Beatles coat-tails for so long, right?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Oh, truly brother Reason, I remember every crude copy the Stones did of THE FOUR; The slow blues covers;The marimba and dulcimer THE FOUR played...somewhere, turning up on the Aftermath album. The dueling folk guitars THE FOUR played...somewhere, turning up on Sittin' On A Fence; the thoughtful & excited piano of Ruby Tuesday/Spend The Night turning up in reverse on many McCartney ballads from '68 on, just as a clever display of THE FOUR'S power. One cloned the other.AH-AH-ME-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn You got it bro, they copied the Beales all the way until the Beatles broke up. As John said, "They were always interested in what 'The Beatles' are up to". Truly, the Stones are followers, the Beatles: leaders.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
That's right. The Afro-Samba sound of THE FOUR on that one song (which one?)which the Stones copied on Sympathy. That Honky Tonk Women song THE FOUR had a #1 with; strict copycats.And John was no way motivated by the fact he had thrown away his own band to make albums with his no-talent girlfriend while the Stones stayed together to continue to thrive. John was above petty human emotions like insecurity or jealousy, being one of the inventors of music, THE FOUR. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn If by petty human emotion you mean love then yes, John did succumb to it. The Beatles moved on to make several nice albums. The Stones stayed together out of necessity. No one else would put up with them for any length of time. Oh, and nice class act move on the Stones part, joining Brian Jones band, kicking him out, and pushing him to suicide. Mick and Keith.....class act those two.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
And yea, Brian Jones possessed no bipolar tendencies, did not start screwing up onstage, did not beat his woman enough to make her leave him for Keith, and ingest enough brandy and LSD to erase his musical skills and make him useless to the band. This was all the work of, you guessed it, the Stones, when they weren't busy planning the assasinations of John Kennedy, his brother, and Martin Luther Kind. No wonder they sang about the Devil. Bless THE FOUR. AH-AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn What a fine class act Keith was to snatch up Brian's ex. That's a real good buddy for ya, taking your ex. A real man would have told her sorry and stuck by and HELPED his friend. But no, Mick and Keith were glad to watch the band's founder spiral downward and die, leaving all the glory for them. What a class act those fella's are. THAT is your stones for you.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Yes, Keith held Brian's arms and made him hit Anita; then they personally poured the Brandy and Horse tranquilizer down his throat, all while trying to run a band and get their money from thieving Allen Klein. What energy those boys had! Why not learn support lessons from Lennon, who helpfully sang "you're a rich fag Jew" to Brian Epstein during Baby You're a Rich Man, and told him off in the studio, hastening his suicide. THE FOUR, infinite, immaculate generosity. AH-AH-ME--EHN
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Wow, all you can ever do is set up straw men and then knock them down. You are terrible at debate. No one ever claimed Keith made Brian hit his girlfriend or take drugs. But Keith was right their to snatch her up when the time came. What an awesome buddy Keith was to Brian for that. And Mick and Keith, kicking Brian out of his own band, those guys are such awesome friends. I wish you had friends like that. :-)
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Yes, Anita played no part in running to Keith; he simply stole her away from him while she begged and screamed to be returned to Brian's violent arms; if only he'd been a true buddy and held Anita's arms while Brian boxed her senseless. What a bastard! And Brian's drug convinctions in no way stood in the way of the Stones ability to return to touring and being a functioning band. They just fired him for no reason at all. Reason's immaculate wisdom triumphs again. AH-AH-AH-MEH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Oh, she of course played a part. But Keith, being the stand up guy he is, told her it would be inappropriate. Wait, no he didn't. He gave her a good old Stones shag. And then you continue with another set of strawmen, Keith holding Anita for Brian to beat her, blah, blah, blah. Please learn how to debate, these strawmen are tedious. But WAIT!! I thought it was those rebel Stones drug convictions that made them so cool? But now you say they fire Jones for drug use. What's up?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Ah, Reason uses the term "strawmen" whenever the debater's hyperbole exposes how ludicrous his stance is. Got it. Anyway, no, putting words in my mouth won't help you here. They didn't fire him for drug use; they fired him because his continued convinctions, unlike theirs, made it impossible for them to tour as an actual band (unlike the on life-support studio husk known as THE FOUR) with him onboard. Simple necessity, sad to say.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn I use hyperbole when YOU exaggerate and the term strawmen when you try to claim I exaggerate. Sooo, Brian's convictions were an impediment to their touring yet, as you claim, Mick et. al's convictions showed how they were such cool rebels. Should Brian have checked his planner and synched convictions with them? As he was the founder seems to me they should have checked with him. Least they could have done is change the name, but then, there was all that money. Hmmmmm Good buds
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@steveconned: That you are a racist and cultural imperialist is now an established fact. You claim that it was not African-Americans who invented "rebel rock," but rather the English suburban white boys, one of whom, the Mick Jag-off, was a student at the elite LSE. Your entire oeuvre of bullshit consists of the straw man, post hoc ergo hoc, ignoracio elenchi logical fallacies, and cultural colonialism, ageism, and misogyny. Time for your 20th nervous breakdown, hypocrite.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 4
@steveconned: How laughable were the Rolling Drones? As Browning put it, Let me count the ways: HORRIBLE guitar solos from both Wood and Richards (Harrison annihilated both of them even on his troubled solo tour in '74). And then there was the ultimate in Yuppie minstrelsy: Micky Jag-off, student of the elite LSE dressed in several thousand dollars of Versace's Wall Street clubbing crap singing, get this, "Street Fighting Fake."LAUGHABLE!! Check it for yourselves, everyone. It is a real hoot.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 7
@steveconned: you have long proved your lack of education. "Straw man" is not synonymous with hypberbolé. The strawman logical fallacy is an imaginary/contrived oppositional argument set up only to be too easily riposted. An example of the straw man: your attempt to cast the Beatles as "middle-of-the-road" because they wore suits. But this, of course, ignores the political threat the Beatles were in song, protest, and deeds. Hypocrisy and racism: you are a Drones fan.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 12
@steveconn Why the hell are you talking about the Stones, and not about Pauls FANTASTIC vocals on Yesterday! Paul stole the show. He`s fantastic!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist Paul is just some schmaltzy cocktail lounge piano balladeer pretending to be a rocker. Should have gotten a job at the Carlyle saying 'Thank you, you're too kind' as hotel guests filled his tip jar.
steveconn 9 months ago
@steveconn Haha yeah right. Maybe you should switch on your hearing aid? He is a fucking genius, and a fantastic musician! Paul McCartney is an icon. There will NEVER be another Paul McCartney! Nor will there be another John Lennon. I`m a huge Rolling Stones fan and i`ve seen both Paul and Stones live. They`re unique.
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
don't talk with steveconn.
he's a miserable motherfucker whose only sense in life is to bash on the greatest band of all time. (really, i saw him on other vids years ago doing exactly the same thing).
He's not worth you answer.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil Well, i don`t take him seriously. He dismissed Paul McCartney as a worthless piece of shit. I don`t take people like that seriously, cause Paul McCartney is the greatest songwriter that has ever lived, along with John Lennon of course. And he`s a fucking great singer and musician too. Listen to his voice on "Yesterday" It`s live, and he didn`t hear a damn word cause of the screaming, and he sang like an angel! Paul`s my main beatle. I love John too, but Paul is my man!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist i love them all, george is my main beatle, but steveconn isn't worth answering.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil I forgot to mention George. He was a great songwriter and a wonderful guitarist. I love his debut album. It`s my favorite post-beatles album by any of the Beatles. I`m not a huge fan of Ringo though. I think he`s a mediocre drummer even though he played well on a couple songs like "Rain" for instans. Pauls bass on "Rain" is magical, btw.
Yellyist 9 months ago
Except for the Ringo statement we afree, but Ringos unique and imaginative drum patterns were as imporntant to each song as Pauls bassline, what would come together be without ringo, that groove, from i saw her standing there over rain, i just can't name one drum performance of ringo i don't love.
ImO the most underrated drummer of all time.
but Keith Moon didn't ask him to drum on his album without a reason, just like he drummed on all other beatles solo albums once in a while.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil i don`t like Ringo`s drumming on many tracks. I`m no fan of Ringo. He`s the only beatle i don`t like. He doesn`t even sign any autographs anymore. i think Charlie Watts is a good drummer. I like him a lot. He and Bill Wyman was a good team. But, that`s my opinion.
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
i like charlie too, but he never produced a beat that i found special, and wyman on bass is as basic as you could be in the 60s.
he doesn't sing autographs because a lot of them show up on ebay, and paul didn't sing stuff since the late 60s for christs sake, just like about ALL of them don't sign send items, ringo did for many years, much more and longer than most others.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil "and paul didn't sing stuff since the late 60" what did you mean by that???
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
you say that ringo doesn't sign stuff anymore that's send to him like it#s the most normal thing for celebs to do, while 99,9 % don't do it, he was very rare in that aspect.
try to send paul something to sign and you'll see.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThrandui He does not sign autographs period. He refuses to sign autographs for people he meets on the street etc. Paul signs autographs and he always will. But that`s not important. I don`t like ringo, I think he`s a mediocre drummer, and nothing you say or do will make me change my mind about that. I don`t like his style. I like John, Paul and George. They were the beatles for me. And the Beatles are my no.1 band. There will never be anyone like them again. They`re fantastic!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyi
well, ringo was the glue that held the beatles together for so long, that's the reason why after the break-up he was the only one on friendly terms with all the others, without his drumming the beatles wouldn't have become what they did.
he was as importnant as the other 3 and his drumming is appreciated by others ranging from phil collins over dave grohl to steve weinberg, i don't think you are a drummer or you would know what ringo had.
without ringo no beatles, period, not debatable.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil Everything is debatable. John Lennon and Paul McCartney were the beatles in my view. They wrote the hits, and made them what they are today. George contributed too, but Paul and John was the main members. Their songwriting skills is amazing. There is no one better. Ringo`s drumming had nothing do to with the beatles success. It was John and Pauls songwriting skills that did it for the beatles.
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
When paul was asked who his favorite drummer to work with was (around the late 90s) he still said ringo, just like john said ringo always knew exactly what he wanted, they all appreciated ringos talent to make every drum pattern uniqie and identifiable just by themselfes.
Paul and Ringo are my alltime favoirte rythm section.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil I love Pauls bass, but Ringo isn`t a great drummer in my opinion. He plays well on a couple beatle songs like "Rain" and "She loves you" His style is too safe and the sound is too soft. I like hard hitting drummers. He`s a capable drummer, but i don`t like his style. He was better on their first records. He plays well on early songs like "She loves you" "I saw her standing there" and "i want to hold your hand"
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
ringo being a safe drummer???
charlie watts was a safe drummer, in 50 years that guy created probably 3 remarkable drum tracks.
ringo created a uniqe drum pattern for every song, his fills are reagrded as some of the most musical and imaginative of all time, all the great drummers appreciate him, and he could hit hard like on helter skelter or during their early club days and later live concerts Take every long tal sally for example).
read the drum skills part of his wiki article.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@Yellyist
by the way saw paul in 2009 2 times, at the first of those concerts i was first row standing right before him, 3 hour set bith times, he played 5 instrumetns during the concert, and it was the first tour where he played both day tripper and obladi -oblada.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
@OropherThranduil I`ve only seen him once, and i was right in front of the stage. I had eye contact with him several times.. He was FANTASTIC. His voice was great, and he played a lot of instruments. I don`t like his current band. I loved the band he had in the early ninetees. They were the best. I`ve seen Rolling Stones and Elton John live too.
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist It's not how how many instruments you play, it's WHAT you play, and 95% of what Paul put out was cutesy schmaltz and weak, polite lyrics, with a couple "look, I can be hard too" songs like Helter Skelter. The guy basically invented the sound of Barney the Dinosaur, Romper Room, and Sesame Street. Play the guitar and that piano all you like Paul - your nuts are still cut off.
steveconn 9 months ago
@steveconn we do not agree on Paul McCartney, but that`s fair. We agree on the Rolling Stones cause i love them. i love Paul McCartney. He`s a genius in my opinion. I love his music, and he was the best beatle in my view. Let`s agree to disagree!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@steveconn I would like to see you write a song like yesterday, and sing it as well as Paul does in this fantastic clip. I`m a huge Rolling Stones fan, but none of the members of the Rolling Stones can touch Paul McCartney and John Lennon as singers, songwriters or musicians. And that`s why the Beatles sold 1 billion records, while the Rolling Stones only sold 200 million. People prefer quality!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist No, people like safe, middle-of-the-road muzak that can be played on supermarket and dentist office intercoms, and that's why the Beatles' largely safe, neutered mainstream-pandering music is so popular. The Stones weren't interested in appealing to every mom, pop, granny, and puppy in the suburbs; they're about the darker, more interesting edges to society and behavior. That's why they sold less than the Beatles, and that's what makes their music so much more urgent, vital and alive.
steveconn 9 months ago
Comment removed
Yellyist 9 months ago
@steveconn As if "I am the walrus" or "tomorrow never knows" are middle of the road muzak?? You don`t have a clue. What about "Ruby tuesday" and "As tears goes by" That`s Stones doing middle of the road muzak in my book, so i guess they were all guilty. And i love those songs. "Yesterday" is a beautiful song, and it has great lyrics. Again, come on. If you think Paul is a worthless piece of shit. Write something better. I would love to see you sing better, write better and play better than Paul
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist The Stones did 90% percent raw, balls out rock, 10% cutesy ballads and polite, inoffensive songs. The Beatles did the opposite. That is why the Stones express the reality of life for adults while the Beatles are for ivory-tower, airy fairy sensibilities. John's sterile drugged-out songs didn't offend anybody. They're just self-absorbed. Barry Manilow, Hanson, and Wayne Newton can also sing and play better than me; that doesn't mean their music isn't weak cornbread pop for the masses.
steveconn 9 months ago
@steveconn I was wrong about you. I thought you were a beatles fan that didn`t like Paul since you trash talked him. But it seemes to me that you don`t like the beatles at all. So why the hell are you watching a beatles video on youtube if you hate the music? I thought you liked the music. I don`t watch bands that i don`t like. God, i have other things to do.
Yellyist 9 months ago
@steveconn I love the Stones, and i saw them live a couple of years ago. Keith is my man in the Stones. Mick is ok, but he sold out when he got knighted, but! They haven`t really produced anything great since Exile on Main St. There have been some moments here and there,but it`s almost 40 years ago since they released a really great album. "emotional rescue" and "fool to cry" are even worse than the worst of Wings. Paul McCartney`s "Band on the run" album is better than any of Stones 70`s albums
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist Actually Goat's Head Soup, Black and Blue, Some Girls, Tattoo You, parts of Undercover, Voodoo Lounge and a Bigger Bang are great albums. Emotional Rescue's been playing in my car for weeks - just a fun, enjoyable album, no twenty thousand overdubs, multiple tape loops and cutesy lyrics required. The Stones are just music embodied, not some act endlessly trapped in its 60's image and reputation. Glad you like Paul's stuff - perfect suburban music: happy, bland, and inoffensive. Enjoy.
steveconn 8 months ago
@steveconn Goats head soup has three really good songs, Star star,Heartbreaker and Angie. I`m sure you hate Angie since it sounds like something Paul could have written, but i love it.Emotional rescue is a horrible track. That`s Mick of course. He wanted the Stones to do disco in the late 70`s.I think Keith is the heart and soul of the Stones. He wants to stick to rock and roll, while Mick wants to be modern.Fool to cry is shit too. I can`t stand that song. Silly love songs is a classic compared
Yellyist 8 months ago
@Yellyist A Hundred Years Ago, Coming Down Again,and Winter are also great tracks and Angie escapes chipmunk Paul's influence thanks to the rocky drums and not sounding like its in need of an insulin injection.Emotional Rescue is a sexy, Prince-influenced track that was a huge hit on black radio. Of course sexy and black are two things the loveable mop tops & their whitebread fans can't handle, so I see your dislike of it & Fool To Cry. Anyone who likes Manilowesque Silly Love Songs is lost.
steveconn 8 months ago
@steveconn Silly love songs was a HUGE hit. Well, i see you like Micks crap, cause Emotinal rescue and fool to cry has nothing to do with the Rolling stones. It`s Mick trying to be commercial. I know that Keith hates those songs. I`m reading his book now, and he talks about his differences with Mick on music, and that he allowed Mick to pollute the Rolling Stones with crap music in the late 70`s. Mick is a great frontman, but Keith is the heart and soul of the Rolling Stones!
Yellyist 8 months ago
@steveconn "Silly love songs" is a great pop song, and highly underrated. It was the biggest selling single in the world in 1976, and the live version on "Wings over Amercia" proves how brilliant the song really is. I`m not gonna do a Rolling Stones vs Beatles debate with you, cause i think it`s rubbish. I love both bands.Rolling Stones is just as important for me as it is for you.To bad you don`t like the Bealtes, but that`s your loss.I`ve seen The Stones live.I was right in front of the stage!
Yellyist 8 months ago
@Yellyist Paul and the Beatles are like the McDonald's of pop music. Billions and billions served with smiley fun happy meals. If that's what you think music should be, cool. I just prefer that which isn't afraid of its black roots and doesn't water them down into non-existence so that all the white listeners are happy.
steveconn 8 months ago
@steveconn The Beatles did a lot of motown numbers, and they did Little Richard and Chuck Berry songs like "long tall Sally" and "Rock and roll music" I don`t have to make the case for the Beatles. Songs like "Yesterday" "Eleanor Rigby" "Here, there and everywhere" "Let it be" "Hey Jude" "Strawberry fields forever" "Penny Lane" Blackbird" "The fool on the hill" "Julia" "Help" "Something" "While my guitar gently weeps" etc etc will live on forever cause they`re classics!
Yellyist 8 months ago
@Yellyist But they watered down all those black numbers with their chipmunk harmonies so that the soul in them became pointless; the Stones weren't afraid of putting the black grit of their covers up front. All those numbers you mentioned except for Fields, Julia, Help, and the Harrison songs are just Paul elevator music: harmless, cute and dull the way the suburbs likes it, though George got pretty close with his yuppie effort Something. Julia and Fields is John slowly circling his navel. Yay.
steveconn 8 months ago
@Yellyist There`s in no harnomies on "Long tall Sally" or Rock and Roll music" The songs i mentioned are the ones i consider to the best beatles songs. I like ballads, and i`m not too keen on black music. Soul and motown is my cup of tea. I like pop and rock and roll. i think songs like "Helter skelter" "Back in the USSR" "Get back" "I`m down" "I saw her standing there" "Jet" "Hi Hi Hi" are brilliant examples of Pauls ability to write good rock songs! John too. He wrote "Revolution"
Yellyist 8 months ago
The McDonalds of Pop Music? Get your head out of your arse. Absurd. Rubber Soul, Magical Mystery Tour, Revolver, Sgt Pepper, White Album, Abbey Road, all contained far more inventive music than anything The Stones ever did....lyrics, instrumentation, vocals, musicianship,arrangements, not even close. Stones = overrated garage band. Beatles = a band for the ages. 300 years from now, they'll be thought of as the classics like Mozart and Beetohven are today....
Henryep10 2 months ago 3
@Henryep10 They went from a cutesy boyband to overproduced, sterile elevator muzak. Whoopee. At least the Stones sound like real people playing real instruments, not machines talking to eachother
(and they wrote about the times around them -"who killed the Kennedys?"- instead of offering ivory-tower yuppie bullshit -"it's gonna be alright.")
steveconn 2 months ago
And yea, the first negro rock n' roll records were transmitted to England, but yea as the scripture tells us they were only transmitted to four radios in the entire country, and allowed to inspire only FOUR, the GODLIKE FOUR. From 1955 until 1962,THE FOUR shaped this material, took out the rougher negro timbers, and created the only defintion of youth music ever to exist. Once their message was complete,they allowed a few lesser musicians to hear the original negroes, and to imitate.AH-AH-MEH-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn And yet more BS for the stenchhole that is your mind. I assume you mean "negroe" timbre you racist ass (unless there is some kind of wood exclusive to the black community). The graceful thing for you to do here is accept you lost (twice) and leave. Why come back after you said you were done? Can't stand to not have the last word? Your best bet to have any sympathy for your views would be to die.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Yea, Reason finds yet another 'reason' (ha, how appropriate) to disparage my pitiful soul. Bless him for his immaculate steadiness. He has caught me mispelling negro. Please, Reason, let me drop to my knees and genuflect for your forgiveness.I only meant it in reference to the negro-imitating, child-raping, slavery upholding Republican mascots the Stones, to explicate further the complete invention of music by THE FOUR and all others as mere dust. Please forgive, Reason, forgive.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Jesus, you really are the dumbest child I have ever had the displeasure of talking to. I was correcting your spelling of timbre, which you spelled timber. Man, if you can't keep up then maybe it is time you shut up. Do you need a coloring book to help you out?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steveconn Jesus, you really are the dumbest child I have ever had the displeasure of talking to. I was correcting your spelling of timbre, which you spelled timber. Man, if you can't keep up then maybe it is time you shut up. Do you need a coloring book to help you out?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
And, yea, some unsmiling negro musicians in America's south plucked some chords, sang in a deep guttaral sound, and made a few pennies. Then some negro wannabes in England listened to their records, attempted to imitate the guttural sounds, and make even more pennies. But all, all were simply obliterated into dust by the arrival of THE FOUR, who taught them that music at its highest is presented with lovely chiming harmonies and smiles for all. Goodbye guttural sounds. Hello bliss. AH-AH-MEH-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
Why wasn't I there to take a stand when the Stones returned the negroes of the world to shackles of slavery? Why wasn't I there to prevent them from repealing women's voting rights?
Why wasn't I there when they colluded with Karl Rove in '04 to fix the voting machines in Ohio, returning Bush to office? Why wasn't I there to shout down the blasphemer who said THE FOUR lived in great mansions and townhouses, and didn't live in semi-detached squalid homes in London? I have been weak,Lord,too weak.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Yes, you DO attack the Beatles with the ass-headed ironic hyperbole. Neither Jaime nor myself said they invented music nor the rest of the exaggerated claims you make. The fact that the Stones are the favored group of the Right does not lead to the ridiculous hyperbole you are trying to place in Jaime's or my mouth. Bottom line is this: the Stone's were, are, and always will be seen as the band that followed the Beatles, the band that is 2nd to the Beatles. No Beatles = No Stones
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Forgive me, my liege, I cannot comprehend yours and Jaime's infinite wisdom. I am only a lowly interpreter of THE FOUR. I forgot they turned on the radio to allow a young Keith Richards to hear Chuck Berry for the first time, gave a teen Mick Jagger his first blues records and gave him permission to perform for his family and then at Alexis Korner's blues gatherings in London, that they paid large crowds to show up at the early Stones shows at the Richmond Hotel. Forgive me. AMEN
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Those aren't the only things you fail to comprehend. I agree, you are indeed lowly. Then you continue on with your insulting irony. No, the Beatles never did any of those items you sarcastically state above. What they DID do however was write their first charting song to hit the top 20. Why oh why did your wonderful Stones need the Beatles to write a song for them? If not for the Beatles to open the door AND write a hit for them, the Stones remain a London local act.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
And yea, Reason stoops to correct my ignorance yet again,praise his soul.Why indeed did the Stones need THE FOUR to write songs for them,when their own covers of negro blues songs were so much more popular with whitebread UK audiences than THE FOUR'S angry songs about holding hands and loving them do?Those sweet Delta blues songs were always taken to the bosom of the UK public over the raw and ruthless songs of THE FOUR.Reason asks a good question;it remains a mystery to this day
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Are you trying to insinuate that the Stones were more popular than the Beatles? Maybe I am misunderstanding you through all your BS irony, hyperbole, and sarcasm, but if that IS what you are trying to insinuate you are truly brain dead. The Stones were never more popular or more well known than the Beatles. Another item worth noting, the Stones were in a MUCH larger population center (London) then the Beatles (Liverpool & Hamburg).
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
No, no, no, Reason, I would never suggest the Stones were more popular, despite catering to the mainstream by wearing matching suits for most of the 60's and basing their material on sweetly harmonized pop songs, while THE FOUR said fuck it, wore leather jackets on Ed Sullivan and never smiled for their audiences.Somehow, despite this daring strategy, THE FOUR still managed to capture the hearts of the mainstream public and sell the most records. Those daring rebel FOUR. AH-ME-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn And again I say (try to answer it if you can), if the Stones were such bad boys then why aren't you a fan of some real rebellious bands like the Sex Pistols, Metallica, Guns and Roses? See, in your mind, the Beatles are pussies while Zeppelin, Metallica, etc. are all Cro-magnons. Are the stones just that perfect blend for you? Just the right amount of pussiness AND stupidity? I do agree with you on that. And the Beatles wrote about MUCH more than love you wanker.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Again, your wisdom is beyond Godlike, Reason. As children, the Sex Pistols, Metallica, Guns & Roses watched their televisions and saw the sneering, leather-jacketed FOUR tear up the set of the Ed Sullivan show and said, "That is how I want to Rock N' Roll. Pander to no one; outrage everything." How the Stones polite, meek suburban-pandering pop ever figured into their evolution is one of the great mysteries, like Amelia Earhardt and the Lochness Monster. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Oh, and the Beatles did in fact go through a leather jacket phase in Germany but, as you like to say, you eventually grow up. And they did in fact move on past that phase. Unlike you who can't get past this. Really, you should not invest so much of your self-esteem in the Stones. Your insecurities are clearly showing.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
How many times, divine soul, must I corroborate yours and jaime's faultless wisdom? I invest no self-esteem in the Stones. I have followed the Gospel of Jaime that the Stones are Republican-supporting, negro and women enslaving, greedy wannabes, who even failed at wearing the iconoclastic matching suits of THE FOUR as the 60's progressed. I do my best to trod thy path, but it is a difficult road for one so lacking in thine divinity, Reason. Forgive me. Forgive me. AH-AH-ME-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Okay, so you agree the Stones suck and the Beatles are great. Super! Now you can go ahead and leave.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Yes, the Stones promote Republicanism, slavery and woman-hating with music that does not excite the pulse and make one want to move, while THE FOUR's creamy white harmonies, inert stage presence, and bland songs of peace and harmony are the essence of Rock N' Roll. Did I not make this clear, Godly one?
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Nope, not clear. The Stones music sucks and The Beatles rock, right? Simple yes or no (without further comment) will do.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
That can be no simple yes or no, because simple is for simpletons. Isn't that right, divine, sacred, immaculate Reason?
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Absolutely, which is why I requested the simple yes or no from YOU Mr. Stephen Conn. So, Yes or No?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
In the way that Perry Como albums rock, the Beatles rock. If you consider that admission a victory, than I hope your insurance covers your coma-like state and listening tastes. Good luck.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn No no, I mean the Stones suck and the Beatles rock. Isn't that what you are saying in all your posts earlier which are attempts at ironic hyperbole? The Stones suck and the Beatles are great. Yes or no?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
No, in reality the Beatles are middle-of-the-road, family friendly whitebread sell-outs with a few hard songs buried on the White Album while the Stones even in their earliest records are the birth cry of modern rebel Rock. And that's the final statement of truth
(except for your last pathetic delusionary comment to follow mine. Bye.)
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn If by "birth cry of modern rebel rock" you mean sub-par blues cover band then right you are. On their 1st 3 albums, 26 of the 36 songs were covers. And THAT is the truth for you SteveO. You live in a fantasy world where the Stones changed rock and the Beatles did nothing. I (and 600 million to 1 billion other people) beg to differ. Without the Beatles there are no Stones. The Stones are secondary (at best) to the Beatles. The Beatles influence on the Stones is undeniable.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@steveconn Oh, and thank you Steve for showing your intelligence yet again by stating that Lennon sang "rich fag jew". Show me your credible source for this. You see, this is called a RUMOR and perhaps you should look up your facts. Now Lennon did suggest, jokingly, that Epstein could call his autobiography "Queer Jew". So, nice try fool. Now run along and go review a movie.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
RollingOreo@steveconned:, Eve/RollingOreo/Steveconned, please do explain why the Drones are all wearing the "middle-of-the-road" matching suits in the following album covers: Aftermath; Golden Album Pic Disc; Paint it Black; The Rolling Drones; Slow Rollers (I'll say), etc., etc.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 3
@steveconned/RolandOreo: More of steve's racist bullshit. He claims the Drones are the "birth of modern rebel rock." Well, talk about cultural genocide: according to steveconned, the BLACK inventors of rock never existed. No Chuck Berry, Ike Turner, James Brown, the Isley Bros: The "final statement of truth" is right here in steveconned's own words. And they prove conclusively what an insufferably hypocritical racist and cultural imperialist poseur he is. So are the Drones.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 4
I watched the Rolling Drones 1990 concerts on PBS yesterday. THEY SUCKED!!!!! This tape of the Beatles from 1966 features a tighter, more musically adept band than the Drones could achieve even some twenty-four years to practice. The low points? SYMPATHY FOR BULLSHIT. HORRIBLE!!! Richard's solo was laughably bad, Wyman's one-note run-down of a song that descends from E to D major like poop from a pig? RISIBLE. And it just got worse. FACT.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 6
@jaimeguitar50
That's why i always say Keith was the best bassplayer in the band, he played on sympathy for the Devil, Jumping jack Flash and some others, but those 2 alone take him over anything wyman ever played.
OropherThranduil 10 months ago
@OropherThranduil Paul McCartney is the best bass player ever!!!!
Yellyist 9 months ago
@Yellyist
I can't agree with you that Paul McCartney was the best Bass Player in the Rolling Stones.
Because that's what i was talking about, first think, then write.
OropherThranduil 9 months ago
Comment removed
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaimeguitar50
Sorry, jaime, no one's indulging your crazy horseshit anymore. Just keep giving your own comments thumbs up and good luck.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconned:
Steveconned/RolandOreo: As one given to mental meltdowns on the world wide web, ludicrous claims about the Rolling Drones, and outright claims drenched in racism, ageism, misogyny, and outright stupidity, you have demonstrated a piquant penchant for the excrement of horses and bulls. As to claims about auto-acclaim, given your demonstrable resort for auto-"satisfactions," you ought not give further fuel to those who already consider you laughable, at best.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaimeguitar50 everyone YouTube that disagrees with you is a racist. You should learn what that word means before you use it.
CIapoIIa 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaimeguitar50 hey Blankfrack, we know you like sticking candlesticks up your paraplegic butthole. But it will not stop your broken bowels from shitting yourself you stupid legless fuck !
CIapoIIa 8 months ago
@RolandOreo/Steveconned: Care to comment on the Rolling Drones wearing matching "middle-of-the-road" suits on over five albums? Care to comment on your racist claim that African-Americans did not invent "rebel rock"? Care to comment on the Rolling Drones HORRIBLE performance in 1990, one that the Beatles shredded in 1966? Care to comment on Versace-clad Mick Jag-off crooning "Street Fighting Fake?" Yeah. I thought so, mdme "horse shit" steveconned.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 7
@steveconned: A "few hard songs?" Well, given that you believe that the Rolling Drones, and not African-American artists such as Chuck Berry or James Brown invented "rebel rock," we can dismiss your idiocies as (1) homo-erotic fixation with the Drones (2) racist drivel (3) musical illiteracy, as the Beatles' Day Tripper alone obliterates the rinky-tink of "Satisfaction." the Drones never did matched the seething Paperback Writer, the funk of Taxman, let alone the wallop of the White Album.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 7
@jaimeguitar50 ROFL He isn't going to come back, at least not in the Steveconned/RollingOreo incarnations. I wince to say it but, that squirmin' dog knows he's just had his day. LOL It's so sad that he not only had to have all of his logical fallacies pointed out to him, but then had to have them all defined for him. Pretty much what I expected from a guy whose life model is another man who walks about on stage like a chicken with epilepsy.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago 3
@Reason4U2Die: Great work, my friend, and a shout out to the hilarious steve cocked as well. Steveconned/Rolling Oreo "can't git no satisfaction," having run into the wall of facts, evidence, and truth. Mickey Jag ain't no James Brown---or Prince, for that matter. And the Rolling Drones never were and never will be as musically adept, politically significant, and culturally liberating as the Beatles.
Whoa! I...I... think I hear steve bawling again! Steve: We Don't need no Wah Wah!
LMAO!
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 2
@steveconn LMAO, you had to take 20 minutes time out to log onto your RollingOrmund account to make a comment on the "Beatles Revolution #4" video. Man you are pathetic? Why not just post as Steveconn? God damn your life must be boring LOL
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Thank you for following me around youtube, oh blessed Reason. You truly display no stalker tendencies but only divine generosity by correcting my most humble faults. Thank you again, celestial one.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Only trying to help :) You pick a fight, you get a fight. Deal with it :-) Your comments on that vid are as pointless as the ones here. Why are you so threatened by the Beatles? Is it because deep down you really truly know they surpass the stones in everyway. My guess is yes. You hate hearing how so many people love the Beatles and you wished they were like you and loved the Stones. You're like those religious junkies trying to "save" everyone LOL sad, sad, Stephen Conn
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@steveconn And yes, time permitting, i do believe I will stalk your moronic ass so long as you continue to post your drivel on the Beatles. :-) Enjoy
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
And yea, who is more moronic, the poster, or the one who bothers to stalk him? Why do Ieven ask a question when his grace Reason knows the answer; he knows that, despite the sloppily-produced, angry sounding songs THE FOUR based their reputation on, they would somehow, SOMEHOW, manage to be loved by every mom, pop, son, daughter, grannie, grandpa, cat, dog, puppy on the block.That we all desire to join this group and have no thoughts of our own, that THE FOUR define music. AMEN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn In this case, you are the one who is more moronic. That has ben VERY well established. The Stones don't sound angry, they sound pathetic (but less pathetic then you). So what aspect of the Stones is most important to you? Their pussy assed sound or their cro-magnon level of vapidness?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
That is right, nothing quite expresses anger like I Want To Hold Your Hand, Can't Buy Me Love, Or From Me To You. Those who believe these are the definition of outrage must of course know the definition of what sounds angry in a song, right immaculate Reason? AH-AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn The Beatles expressed a much greater range of emotions through their songs than the Stones ever could. If they didn't spend as much time on anger as the Stones did it is because they, unlike you, realized there are a great deal more emotions to express. As for the Stones "attempt" to express anger....ROFL They just sound hopelessly horny and unsatiated. HEY! Maybe that's why Keith snagged Brian's girl.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Horny and unsatiated. Yes, some humans I have heard are actually like that. Not the eunuchs and virgins that buy records by THE FOUR, mind you, because they know in reality the world is run and conducted through peace, love, understanding, and drugged-out wannabe Dylan lyrics. Yea, THE FOUR, praise THE FOUR, so above us one wonders how they ever deigned to records sounds and thoughts for us mere horny and unsatiated humans. AH-AH-MEH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn "Horny and unsatiated. Yes, some humans I have heard are actually like that."
Yes, I am sure you have "heard" there are people like that. I'm sure that is the case, that you have "heard" this. Oh man, I need to thank you for that one. I actually am laughing so hard it brought a tear to my eye.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
C'mon suckers. Who'd deny me a ramble or ten.
I'm not exactly inundated with requests to teach classical piano so you're all stuck with me.
Forever and ever AAAA-RSOLES.
TheSteveCock 1 year ago
@TheSteveCock
Is TheSteveCock not himself heaven sent, the richest parody of the hapless attempts of a follower of THE FOUR to present his beliefs in their most divine Godhood accurately. He who invented satire, The SteveCock, who invented laughter when the world knew not the concept (well, that is until John Lennon made a joke at the command performance for the Queen), he, who reminds us laughter is the only way to overcome the horror of an unadequately articulated follower of THE FOUR. AMEN.
steveconn 1 year ago
Or was I perhaps too generous in granting the Stone even vocal chords to utter their guttaral sounds by which to record said sounds for the vile, petty purpose of actually selling records (which THE FOUR taught us is the last thing one should do). How could one even grant them this status, since THE FOUR created music and ipso facto by their divine grace they would never grant such suburban negro minstrels the power to spread their disease in the first place? An error in my interpretation. AMEN
steveconn 1 year ago
Perhaps I did not quote from the scripture thorougly enough to jaime and Reason's satisfaction (NO!!! Did I say the word the negro "wannabes" used in their "song?" A thousand lashes for later. For it is written THE FOUR also brought to the human race the concepts of thinking, upright walking, food consumption, shelter building, and took Adam and Eve from the Garden and from them created the many ethic groups of the world (whose descendants they would marry as many of as they could).AH-AH-ME-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey folks. Had lots of correspondence asking why I'm still posting on here despite saying last week that I no longer would.
Well I changed my mind , alright suckers, and besides which I've become even more loopy than I was previously (tough to believe, I know).
To you all, I say AAAAAAAA-SHOLES.
TheSteveCock 1 year ago 18
Lift your chin, negro, no longer need you fear the Stones and their rape of your women.
Stop smirking, blonde white women, your plan to take over the world with your Aryan might by marrying unsmiling fake negro minstrels shall not succeed.
For, THE FOUR have arrived, to take the hand of all negroes (and Asians, and Mexicans) and marry as many of them as time allows, and to send the cackling blonde Nazi women back to the pits of hell. THE FOUR, THE FOUR, and let us sing: AH-AH-AH-ME-EH-EH-EN.
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Damn, you are long winded in these post-meltdown ramblings of yours. What kinda of sad pathetic existence do you lead that you have nothing better to do then to post attempts at messianic irony regarding the Beatles? Don't you have a movie to review or something? You said a week ago you were done but you just keep going. Are you incapable of just moving on and leaving this thread? If you love the Stones so much why don't you just go enjoy some of their videos?
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
And yea, the morning word has come from Jaime's disciple down from the mount, worship of THE FOUR never quite reaching his expectations as his Holy Father Jaime doth preach. We must ponder this. We must ponder this. Is it not enough that the Stones are negro-wannabe, solely Republican mascots for the suburbs, seeking to turn back the clock on women's, ethnic rights, and environmental conditions for the earth, while THE FOUR invented music, peace, rebellion, love, and breathing?
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Typical Steve tactic: just continue on with the same asanine "church-speak" while at the same time avoiding every single point made by Jaime and myself. Still posts even though he said he was through. Still attacks the Beatles instead of just listening to the Stones. Still unable to let this thread go even after this, his 2nd meltdown (which I agree is just weird this time). Poor, sad, pathetic Stephen Conn.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@Reason4U2Die
Who attacks the Beatles, brother Reason? Do I not adequately preach the word of his holiness jaimeguitar, who has taught us the Beatles invented music, social acceptance, social rebellion, love, hate, highest record sales (while not wanting to sell records at all),acceptance by the mainstream, hatred from the mainstream,while the Stones were Republican mascot primates who cravenly sought to make money and not marry their black fans?You have taught me I must strive further.AH-MEN
steveconn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Reason4U2Die
Who attacks the Beatles, brother Reason? Do I not adequately preach the word of his holiness jaimeguitar, who has taught us the Beatles invented music, social acceptance, social rebellion, love, hate, highest record sales (while not wanting to sell records at all),acceptance by the mainstream, hatred from the mainstream,while the Stones were Republican mascot primates who cravenly sought to make money and not marry their black fans?You have taught me I must strive further.AH-MEN
steveconn 1 year ago
Forgive me for my previous post, for I made an error (though his Lordship jaime will doubtless find many more beneath his most holy light): I referred to THE FOUR by their proper names, which is as sacriligeous an error as one can make for they who created the world.Tantamount to saying jaime's name in vain, it is an almost impardonable sin from which there can be no recovery.Perhaps if I donate some money to the "Fight the Right Wing/Anti-Suffrage/Fake Negro Stones" Fund, I might find peace
steveconn 1 year ago
Why, God, why did you grant jaimeguitar50 this wisdom first? Why did he get to be your chosen? To know that John Lennon and Paul McCartney were the most iconoclastic, daring lyricists in the universe? That George Harrison was the most skilled guitarist ever to touch the instrument? That Ringo Starr's drumming was so divine as to teach the heart new rhythms by which to beat? Why, Lord, did you let the rest of us have other opinions when you already deemed him the wisest of all? The Lord is cruel.
steveconn 1 year ago
Please sign this petition if you would like the word "Music" replaced by the word "Beatles" in the dictionary. But not "God." That word is to be replaced by the word "jaimeguitar50." And it is not a petition, it is simply the rule of law. Defy it, and you will confined to the suburbs, with wires forcing your face into a smile as the Rolling Stones sing mock negro songs to your deluded content. You will be warned only once. Good day.
steveconn 1 year ago
And yea, the walking animal known as Mick Jagger, along with the drug-sodden sodomist known as Keith Richards, stepped into a studio one day to pitifully attempt to record some sounds. And at that moment, descending from the clouds, THE FOUR warned them to attempt no such futile gestures. "Do thy not know that we invented music, and rebellion, and peace, and cultural significance and lyrics and recording equipment? Do thy dare express thyself?" And the Stones evaporated. AH-AH-ME-EH-EH-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
How, oh how, fellow citizens of the earth, can we teach jaime his Godhood? He refuses the mantle, disparages those who bestow it upon him, yet it is so obviously his that it would be a crime against the universe for him to turn it down. He, who has shown us the light of THE FOUR, who invented every form of ethnic music and gave it to the ethnicities of the world to use as they please; who married Asians and Mexicans not out of love but as a statement of Nationalistic pride;who are Gods like him?
steveconn 1 year ago
And so it was written, as Jaime the blindingly wise Prophet doth preach, THE FOUR arrived on the shores of America and were spat on, and shunned, and tv screens went black the night they played Ed Sullivan, so iconoclastic and threatening were they to our suburban, wholesome way of life. And the Stones were taken to the bosom of the suburbs, by white families that loved the wholesome songs of Muddy Waters, and the Beatles were turned from hotels and the Stones loved everywhere.AH-AH-AH-ME-EH-EN
steveconn 1 year ago
And yea, we know THE FOUR invented music, all music, all music that ever was, is, and will be, that there was a vast chasm of silence that enveloped the universe until they guided the first homo sapiens to concentrate their vocal chords into the first sounds, taught Mozart to write his first childhood symphonies, and taught the negro people how to express their sorrow in the slave fields.Then, one day when the Stones failed to marry their negro fans, THE FOUR offered betrothal instead.AH-AH-MEN
steveconn 1 year ago
Godlike, Godlike, Godlike; too small a word for the perfection of jaime, an insult to his celestial, immaculate beauty of soul. Legend tells us he was once a mortal, as fallible as the rest of us, until the divine kiss of the inventors of music, THE FOUR, transformed him irrevocably into something else, a soothsayer and prophet to raise the rest of us from the muck. We saw the pretend negroes who bent bluesmen, the elderly, and children over to rape them, and said "ENOUGH!" Let there be jaime.
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
@RollingOrmond Steve, are you really too much of a wimp to post on here with your Steveconn account? You obviously have an OCD as demonstrated by your absolute need to have the last word, but you are truly a coward if you can't come back as Steveconn and do this. Such a sad, pathetic "man".
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago 3
@Reason4U2Die
What, does his holiness' disciple Reason request my humble presence to learn further the ways of THE FOUR? A thousand apologies, your wisdom, I was at a Rolling Stones deprogramming camp, where I was learning the full extent of their activities in aiding Taliban forces in Afghanistan, planting roadside bombs in Iraq against departing U.S. soldiers, and plans to sabotage Democratic primaries in November. Again, a thousand, thousand apologies, your most holy, divine wisdom Reason.
steveconn 1 year ago
RollingOreo/steveconned:
Regarding your ongoing, interminable, and truly low-grade but utterly weird meltdown, Part Deux, you could stand to attain a bit of "Reason." Your life would improve immensely, and so would your prose and postings, if you actually ever did attend a Rolling Drones' "deprogramming camp." As it is, you come across as a campy, mentally deprogrammed disciple of Dupery. Get a shrink, steve: the Rolling Drones are just not that good.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 2
@jaimeguitar50
And lo, the messiah jaime came down yet again from his mount, to teach us confused rabble yet again the proper way to disparage the Stones, because being child-raping, Republican fundraising, human-rights repealing wannabe negroes is not insulting enough to the kind of putrid presence they lent to the earth. How, oh, how, will we ever please jaime? Please, if there is a divine creator in the universe, please, please show us the way to not insult jaime's immaculate perfection...
steveconn 1 year ago
@steveconn Best way to not insult,Steve, is to stop posting your insults on every damn video. If you like the Stones so much why not just stay there and listen to them? Why the need to go to vids of the Beatles and insult them? Are you that threastened by The Beatle's? Are you actually well aware of the Stones inferiority to them and thus have to attack them? Anyway, here is your "divine" advice: STFU.
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago
@jaimeguitar50 Jaime, want a great laugh? Go over to George Harrison This Song and check out our little classically trained pianist/violinist's musical knowledge at work. He claims that the tempo's of both songs are the same and that the TooLang section is the same as the Hare Hare section. This little "prodigy" doesn't even know the keys of the songs, the chords played in either, or even their tempo's. SteveCON, exposed yet again LOL
Reason4U2Die 1 year ago 3
@RollingOreo/Steveconned:
Wow. You have really gone far off the deep end. This is what happens when you surrender all faculties of independant thought to become a Dupe par excellence for so small a cause as, in your own words, the "pretend negroes": Micky Jagg-off and his Rolling Drones The only thing "Godlike" about your pretensions to parody is that, like God, there isn't evidence of it actually existing. As it is, your posts evoke nothing so much as, dare one say it, "white noise."
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 3
And yea, the sweet, innocent child was slowly devoured. The wannabe negro Wyman ate his legs; wannabe negro Watts ate his arms; the wannabe negro Richards ate his chest; and the wannabe negro Jagger ate his heart. But, lo, they could not devour his spirit, for the whitest, purest whitest white men already possessed that, to uplift, to guide, to partake of their everlasting, blindingly white perfection. These men were of course THE FOUR; jaime and Reason already knew their ways. The rest of us...
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
@RollingOreo/Steveconned:
Um, earth to inane asylum Steve: What is this talk of the "rest of us?" Exactly how many voices do you hear in your head? And how long have you fixated over the Rolling Drones' manifest failure to ever match the Beatles in social/cultural significance, musical brilliance, and multicultural explorations? You, the Yuppie wannabe and seeker of all things of "blindingly white perfection," only find catastrophic self-immolation. But you return for more. Truly weird.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 3
And John and Paul dove into the mob of screaming, pleading black women, each one beaten, each one molested in her own personal way by the creature known as Jagger. The demon Jagger promised to marry each one that he made love to on tour, but that was just a ruse to gain their trust, so that he might take their music and use it fund raise for Karl Rove and increase global warming and murder the elderly. But John & Paul married their voices, made a sweet golden harmony, and washed us clean. AMEN.
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
@RollingOreo/steveconned: Micky Jag-off "demon?" Oh, please. Even in your very failed attempt at parody, you reveal your laughable vicarious living via the laughable myth of Jag-off's "demonic" sympathies. The only thing "demonic" about Jag-off was his penchant for horrible, cringe-inducing minstrelsy, and the even more cringe-inducing spectacle of suburban dimwits such as yourself, whose idea of "jungle music" is the prat-like preenings of five twits of the suburban garden: the Rolling Drones.
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 15
@jaimeguitar50
Except for me liking Sympathy fort he devil i LOVED your comment.
and the song shows that Keith was simply a better bass player than wyman.
OropherThranduil 10 months ago
What is it like being perfect? Not perfection in a mortal sense. I mean Godlike perfection, where the mere presence of the perfected sheds wisdom on all lucky enough to be in the perfected's presence? Only jaime can answer this question. Jaime and Jaime alone. How did he attain this immaculate level? Quite simple. He allowed the Heavenly voices of THE FOUR to lift him higher, ever higher still, beyond our reach, where mere listeners to negro-imitating Republicans could only dream to tread. A-MEN
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
@RollingOreo/Steveconned:
"What is it like being" perfectly bat-guano insane and utterly boiled in the brain, eh, steve? Obviously, you will never get over your self-induced mental meltdown in front of thousands, perhaps tens of thousands. And now you treat your uneasy audience to the aftermath: steveconned's drooling, dripping, dread, the mutterings of the terminally defeated, whose total investment of his very, very white self in the Drones was all for naught. Read Camus. It might help...
jaimeguitar50 1 year ago 3
Oh lord, if "I" randomly put "quotation" marks around "every" other "word," might I "attain" the grace "of" your apostle jaimeguitar"50"? Will I "be" able "to" preach the word "of" the FOUR enough to join his "ranks" of everlasting "perfection" and grace"?" Will the baffling "negro"-imitating (and promoters of greed through getting into the music business "to" make money rather "than" give it away like the FOUR) Stones "ever" free my "spirit?" Lord, show me the way to jaime's perfection.Show me
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
And he, Godlike Jaime of the random quotation mark, shall be so benevolent as to allow lesser mortals to type their thoughts on the everlasting holiness of THE FOUR, four young men who came from the land of Liverpool to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony,to shed everlasting light and wisdom so the rest of the world may someday attain an ounce of their grace.The environmental legislation-repealing,kindegarten-burning Stones shall never get there, but sing a none-negro song, and you might.
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
I saw a child beaten, then raped, then beaten again. No one answered his cry.
I saw an old woman wake up to find her pension fund wiped from her account.
Then she was repeatedly raped, beaten, and set on fire. No one answered her cry. I saw free black men and women suddenly returned to shackles. No one answered their cry. Until, finally, a man known as Paul, and another known as Ringo, left their homes, impoverished from decades of charity, and said "No more. The Stones must be stopped."Amen.
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
What is infinitely good and what is infinitely evil? The question has haunted mankind since the dawn of philosophy. But, yea, as it is written, the apostle jaimeguitar 50 has come down from the mountain, deigned to lower himself to our imbecilic level, and with his servant Reason teaches us what is iinfinitely good and pure: