"this should force us into more highly-efficient mass transportation"
Have you ridden a bus lately? It's $5 per adult for a day pass here and not any cheaper per monthly pass than an efficient car, insurance, fuel. Motorcycle and scooters are far cheaper and more convenient.
If you want me to take the bus, trim the fat on it's cost so that it's cheaper $5 per day is a ripoff.
Personally I'd rather make my own alcohol from a crop I can grow in my yard and fuel my scooter with that.
Great interview. Information-packed! Although our lower-energy future may expose the earthbound limits to biofuel (and food) production, this should force us into more highly-efficient mass transportation, which could be a very good thing. And please let's pursue these new fuel frontiers with a newfound reverence for sustainability and bio-diversity. That path is not inevitable; it must be insisted upon.
Blume didn't 'sidestep' your question on energy density. He explained to you that 'energy density' in and of itself is a red herring. That's because the total chemical energy in petroleum products is not as accessible as the total energy in a similar volume of alcohol. This is because the amount of energy extracted depends on how much you can compress the fuel in the cylinder before exploding it to make it do work. Alcohol's better compression characteristics allow make it superior.
Does anybody else think they are warming the planet on purpose? We assume its greed or fear but maybe they have a plan we do not yet understand. I don't know if it is good or not but it seems like there is a purpose.
Yeah- great interview. It is not that easy to get others organized- but think I will help to move this forward. If I can get some farmers to join me it will take off. Really like the vid.
can any one tell me how much land would be required to fuel every car in the world, i seem to remember in roman times that eygypt was very fertile till they over cropped it
I can't give you numbers for the world, but for the U.S., it would take four times the arable land we have to fuel our cars. That means no land used to grow food. Obviously, we can't keep paving over arable land. We will need to have far more efficient transportation -- which means electric -- trains, buses, and fewer cars.
what about using algae and kelp grown in our oceans? He mentioned this in another one of his interviews. I linked it on my blog along with this video. infopatriots(dot)org
@zstowasser Kelp in the ocean is a highly productive ecosystem that should rather not be harvested / destroyed for fuel, but there are some interesting ways to grow algae in glass tubes on roofs, etc.
This brings back the 1970's for me. I remember more than on book at that time on how to brew up fuel from corn squeezings. Now they say the feds will pay you cash money to doing this! COOL!
David sidestepped my questions comparing gasoline's energy-density with ethanol. That's the crux of all the biofuels: we have to grow/produce far more of it to get the same energy equivalent of gasoline. And scientist James Lovelock says a sane response to global climate change would be NOT to put any more land into production. We need to reforest (to sequester carbon), not till marginal lands.
He goes through it in the book. Alcohol has a lower BTU content than gasoline. Fortunately when running through an engine, BTU is not an appropriate measure of efficiency. Alcohol's other properties (latent heat, octane, etc.) make it more comparable to gasoline.
It's sure a relevant idea...I guess I haven't because it feels to me like this is such an intractable challenge, a real hornet's nest...The planet needs us to reduce our numbers, but the biological imperative overrides nearly everything, doesn't it? Sounds fatalistic, but I haven't found an approach to this "elephant in the living room" that "clicks." Saying we should reduce population doesn't cut it, true as it is.
@peakmoment I'm pretty sure Hans Rosling, in one of his great TED talks, pointed out that population growth automatically levels out or becomes negative once a certain standard of living is achieved in a given population (which doesn't necessarily have to be unsustainable, I hope). If you haven't, watch his talks on ted.com, he might be an interesting interview partner aswell.
And thanks for your work, peak moment is a great source of inspiration :)
"this should force us into more highly-efficient mass transportation"
Have you ridden a bus lately? It's $5 per adult for a day pass here and not any cheaper per monthly pass than an efficient car, insurance, fuel. Motorcycle and scooters are far cheaper and more convenient.
If you want me to take the bus, trim the fat on it's cost so that it's cheaper $5 per day is a ripoff.
Personally I'd rather make my own alcohol from a crop I can grow in my yard and fuel my scooter with that.
oregonmeds 7 months ago in playlist Fuel
Great interview. Information-packed! Although our lower-energy future may expose the earthbound limits to biofuel (and food) production, this should force us into more highly-efficient mass transportation, which could be a very good thing. And please let's pursue these new fuel frontiers with a newfound reverence for sustainability and bio-diversity. That path is not inevitable; it must be insisted upon.
SamCarroll212 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why doesn t he even mention hemp ethanol!
ericjhemp 7 months ago
Blume didn't 'sidestep' your question on energy density. He explained to you that 'energy density' in and of itself is a red herring. That's because the total chemical energy in petroleum products is not as accessible as the total energy in a similar volume of alcohol. This is because the amount of energy extracted depends on how much you can compress the fuel in the cylinder before exploding it to make it do work. Alcohol's better compression characteristics allow make it superior.
funknumber49 10 months ago
Does anybody else think they are warming the planet on purpose? We assume its greed or fear but maybe they have a plan we do not yet understand. I don't know if it is good or not but it seems like there is a purpose.
derman077 1 year ago
Yeah- great interview. It is not that easy to get others organized- but think I will help to move this forward. If I can get some farmers to join me it will take off. Really like the vid.
From one of the last individuals. R. young
youngsinfo 1 year ago
yes
edibleaspirations 2 years ago
This will never happen until the overworld can allows and controles.
Buzz
Nikki8La8La 3 years ago
Thanks for sharing Tommy i found this vid very interesting.
XX Kay
fieryangel123 3 years ago
can any one tell me how much land would be required to fuel every car in the world, i seem to remember in roman times that eygypt was very fertile till they over cropped it
alli4joe 3 years ago
I can't give you numbers for the world, but for the U.S., it would take four times the arable land we have to fuel our cars. That means no land used to grow food. Obviously, we can't keep paving over arable land. We will need to have far more efficient transportation -- which means electric -- trains, buses, and fewer cars.
peakmoment 3 years ago
what about using algae and kelp grown in our oceans? He mentioned this in another one of his interviews. I linked it on my blog along with this video. infopatriots(dot)org
zstowasser 3 years ago 3
@zstowasser Kelp in the ocean is a highly productive ecosystem that should rather not be harvested / destroyed for fuel, but there are some interesting ways to grow algae in glass tubes on roofs, etc.
theShice 5 months ago
even at 300 gals per acre which he said is the worst it would take 500 mil acres thats only a 1/3 of the total land area
dont forget the 5 p's
truckerzero 2 years ago
This brings back the 1970's for me. I remember more than on book at that time on how to brew up fuel from corn squeezings. Now they say the feds will pay you cash money to doing this! COOL!
ufoengines 3 years ago 2
David sidestepped my questions comparing gasoline's energy-density with ethanol. That's the crux of all the biofuels: we have to grow/produce far more of it to get the same energy equivalent of gasoline. And scientist James Lovelock says a sane response to global climate change would be NOT to put any more land into production. We need to reforest (to sequester carbon), not till marginal lands.
peakmoment 3 years ago
Well it seems to be working for Brazil. That's a big reason their economy is one of the strongest right now.
hardt67 3 years ago
He goes through it in the book. Alcohol has a lower BTU content than gasoline. Fortunately when running through an engine, BTU is not an appropriate measure of efficiency. Alcohol's other properties (latent heat, octane, etc.) make it more comparable to gasoline.
heyerstandards 3 years ago
Comment removed
Zepherian 2 years ago
great shows do you have any interviews with Negative Population Growth?
tomterahedrob 2 years ago
It's sure a relevant idea...I guess I haven't because it feels to me like this is such an intractable challenge, a real hornet's nest...The planet needs us to reduce our numbers, but the biological imperative overrides nearly everything, doesn't it? Sounds fatalistic, but I haven't found an approach to this "elephant in the living room" that "clicks." Saying we should reduce population doesn't cut it, true as it is.
peakmoment 2 years ago
@peakmoment I'm pretty sure Hans Rosling, in one of his great TED talks, pointed out that population growth automatically levels out or becomes negative once a certain standard of living is achieved in a given population (which doesn't necessarily have to be unsustainable, I hope). If you haven't, watch his talks on ted.com, he might be an interesting interview partner aswell.
And thanks for your work, peak moment is a great source of inspiration :)
theShice 5 months ago
Very interesting!
InTheSticks1881 3 years ago 2
This is the smartest man I have ever herd and he makes alot of since.
RichCrisler 4 years ago 2
very interesting
bearsagainstevil 4 years ago 4