Added: 3 years ago
From: TheCatsters
Views: 2,194
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You guys rock!!

    Thanks for posting all these videos

  • Yes - there is a unique morphism T->T. g o f and the identity are both morphisms T->T so they must be equal.

  • I don't quite follow why the morphism g : T' -> T composed with f : T -> T', g o f, must equal the identity morphism of T. Is this implied by the uniqueness of the morphisms to the terminal object T?

    Assuming there was a morphism h : T -> T that was not the identity morphism of T then there is not a unique morphism from T to T. This contradicts the fact that T is a terminal object therefor any morphism from T -> T must be the identity. Something like that?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more