Religion
1:15
Added: 3 years ago
From: xoxduffyxox
Views: 1,838
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @xoxduffyxox You can be an Atheist and be spiritual at the same time. Trust me on that : )

  • Ok nobody cares what you have to say.i dont.

  • Love the video!

  • :-(

  • less talk, more tits

  • I think the same thing, that's why i converted to Buddhism.

  • Hey I must have died and come to Heaven cause I see an Angel.

    I agree with the Edgar Allan Poe quote.

  • Viko77, you have no understanding of biology, even on a basic level, so spewing ignorant tripe while pretending to will not actually fool anyone into believing your nonsense. If what you said were remotely true, things like modern antivirals and antibiotics would not exist.

    You think that evolution states that a Danish person moving to Africa should get dark skin? Sigh. Here, learn something-Lesson 1: Evolution does not happen at the level of the individual, but at the level of a population.

  • Just so you know, Tao is not actually pronounced with a 'T' sound, but with a 'D' sound. More like Dao. Or to be more phonetic, pronounced like 'dow'.  It is unfortunate that those who first wrote of it in our language chose the wrong letter, but there you have it. Obviously, it's not a big deal, but I thought you might want to know how to pronounce the name of the religion you profess to be a member of. Oh, and one other thing, a person can be atheist AND in awe of nature (aka "spiritual").

  • I'm well aware, but like the sound of Tao better.

  • Ok, well that's your prerogative. But you do also realize that it -does- make you sound ignorant of the subject you're speaking about, right? I'm not saying you ARE ignorant of it, but when choosing to say it with a common mispronunciation, you're not as likely to be taken seriously.

    Yeah, it's a bit of a nitpick, but I thought it worth pointing out.

  • I pronounce a lot of things strangely.

    I'm Canadian but say bagel the American way apparently.

  • Some pronunciations vary from region to region but still maintain their meaning. Some are just plain wrong, though. If language were so completely relative it would be useless. Let's say I choose to pronounce "dog" as uh... "wog." The issue isn't that I don't have a right to do so, (which I certainly do) but that I can't expect others to A) know what I'm talking about, or B) take me seriously if I claim to be a follower of the teachings of dogs. Then again, language evolves. *shrug* up to you.

  • @Veovisce if you are trying to warn her & help her from getting people all on her case later, then good for you! but instead of saying "do you realize....makes you sound ignorant" doesn't really sound so nice. i think it should have been somthing more along the lines of "its pronounced this way, not this way! just helping a friend out! dont want you to get hurt for it later!:)" just saying, dont want you to get hurt later either.

  • All religions are basically the same.

  • Okay,so I never heard of it,I'm an atheist..and I just don't believe things until I see them for myself,but I mean there has to be a source out there of where we came from so I agree with you on that and until we see it with our own eyes I think EVERYONE should just stop fighting about it.

  • religions been put there to devide and rule us

  • Religion is the opium of mankind!

  • Yhea your mother probably babtise you simply because you would have lost many right in USA just because of that. The Atheist (or who ever doesnt belive in the current teaching of religions) is the most untrusted minority (16%) in the US.

  • good thing I'm not american then :P lol people and their assumptions

  • Ya i know, it's great to be Canadian, I gave that statistic cause i couldn't find a good one here (Ca)

  • im 13 and im toist

  • FIVE STARS *****

    Live Long Atheism! The only sane world is the atheist world !!!

  • Scientifically educated...bullshit to believe in evolution....Extraterrestrial life. With practically no scientific evidence thats just as moronic sounding as any other religion.

  • if someone created like on earth then he didnt give us any chance to give THIS some scientific proof, so always it will be only "i guess... i dont know... i mean" :) but you can feel the truth, feel the right path, but be careful, cos feelings are not sure thing. :) anyway, evolution is still not proven and scientifically certain, more so it is totally hoax.

  • How could you even prove evolution? We are talking about the accumulated scientific evidence and applying it to a possible start of the world. Just because something doesn't have certain proof by no means its a hoax. And you believing in an alien race, that has 0 evidence for practically no intellectual reason is just stupid.

  • :) my theory has huge scientific value. aliens could create life on earth via genetics,which is logical. Also transhumanism support my theory. Many scientists believe that ETs had role when creating life. On the contrary, evolution was scientifically denied,cos DNA doesnt change into perfect when enviro-conditions change. Which means that natural selection of species couldnt b real, n evolution isWRONG n broken theory. Honestly. Dya study some science? Cos if no,then we've nothig 2 talk about.

  • only an idiot would discredit evolution.

  • vicko,

    What scientist ever said that DNA had to "change into perfect" for natural selection to occur? All you're doing is creating a straw man. I just hope it keeps the crows away.

  • Yes, science has proven that DNA is never changing its structure by modifying itself into perfectness and improving the organs etc. but it is changing only to deprive and damage, when the environment changes occur. This way, if there is a radioactivity (environmental change), DNA damages but not improves. Thus, during history, were no DNA improvements, and therefore we dont come from monkeys but we were created. I personally believe that the Aliens, humans from space, created us. rael org

  • You have failed to come up with the scientists name. You obviously think that there is such a thing as a "perfect" string of DNA. Can you list that sequence in terms of the bases A,C,G,T.

  • there are thousands of scientists denying evolution...! inform yourself, google their names yourself. bye. or stay ignorant.

  • vicko said "there are thousands of scientists denying evolution"

    That was not what I asked you for. I asked you to support your claim that a scientist said that DNA had to "change into perfect".

    I certainly did not ask you for the list of engineers, lawers and chemists et all, that the creationist institute has assembled.

  • google their names, it is your job. DNA is not able to change into imporvements cos it is itself non-intelligent and non-conscious structure...

  • vicko, the reason that you can't list the name of the scientist that said (according to you) that DNA had to "change into perfect," is because scientifically, the phrase is meaningless. First you would have to define what the perfect string of DNA is, in terms of A,G,C,T; but you can't, there is no such thing as a perfect strand of DNA.

  • Perhaps an analogy will help in your understanding of change. Suppose I make two copies of a boat. One I accidently make an inch longer, and the other an inch shorter. Making a hull longer makes it more streamline but slightly heavier, Making a hull shorter makes it less streamline but lighter. Until we try the boats out we do not know whether the copying errors are beneficial or not. Furthermore whether one is beneficial or not may depend on wave size and wind strength.

  • DNA is a replicating molecule. When copies are made there is a small probability that a copying error is made. However at the time the copy is made we do not know whether its an improvement or not. Whether its an improvement or not, is only determined from trying it in the environment. If it effectively improves the genes chance to propagate, it's a success.

  • This way, monkey could never change into a human being and fish into snake etc, what truly evolution says, a totally false theory made up in 19 th century, thus some 150 y ago, in the times when DNA was not even discovered and for me and many other ediucated people, Darwin was not more than a shaman, therefore, not a scientist ;)

    I wont write again. Any way, I am not a God believer creationist, I think that Aliens, scientists from another planets, created us, in their image. rael org

  • "This way, monkey could never change into a human being and fish into snake etc"

    it's a good thing people see that line as the very first thing, knowing any and all of your arguments are invalidated from the get-go

  • you, evolutionists, you have no rational arguments at all too... you only guess....

  • "To assume, presume, or assert (a fact) without sufficient information."

    You got a book for proof, that can never be questioned

    We got the entire physical world for proof, to work on, science seems to do pretty well in letting you exist on this site, for instance.

  • vicko, It's just as well, that you told me, that you are "ediucated," because I would never have guessed.

  • So to summarize:

    1)DNA can and does change

    2)Whether that change is an improvement or not, depends on the environment.

  • so to summarize....

    i know many doctors, scoentists personally who oppose evolution strongly and hey have phd... etc....

    1. DNa doesn change, yes, but never improves... it doesnt depend of environement

    i could write here much much more, links, etc, but i have no time to write to unknown people on internet, srry

    bye

  • DNA does change but never improves..

  • You say that whether a change is an improvement or not, does not depend on the environment. Here is a hypothetical situation:

    Suppose a person developed gills.

    Planet A is covered in deep water.

    Planet B has no puddle of water deeper than 2 inches (50mm).

    Are gills an advantage on planet A's environment or Planet B's?

  • on any of those planets will NOT be developed any gills :D simply, they dont develope by itself. environment cannot cause this. cos DNA is not changing into develioping by itself. it changes only as a damage of DNA. but never totally new organs or tissues. There is no logic in evolution as many of my friends, student and teachers of biology and genetics said, university teachers! simply, i think that life was CREATED, but not by God, but by scientists,biologist from space, Aliens. rael org

  • Errr no ? Our body has the ability to adapt. I know the name in spanish but not in english. To give you a simple expample. When we live too much time on a sunny place we develop darker skin because it protects us from sunlight. Youst like african people. But major changes like more arms or gills develop themselves over a lot of years. And they only develop in certain enviroments. When it helps. Every living being does it. Not only humans. Not because god makes it. Cause god doesnt exists. Bye !

  • no, it never develops just because of a need. it was scientifically proven that DNA never changes into perfectness, it only damages when environment changes. it will never create a black skin for a man if he lives on sun many years! you should already notice it, when a danish guy comes to africa, his skin gets scorched, but he never becomes dark skinned. lol.

    also not god made that ! but aliens, extraterrestrial scientists programmed DNA and thuis created life on Earth - rael org

  • and yes , there is no god at all, but Aliens who created life on Earth - rael org

  • I have no time to search about it on internet and I have no interest to write here it to you all. Simply, no time. I am in a work and also have many other things to do ;) it is simply obvious, that DNA is changing, yes, when replicating, it is changing its structure sometimes and we dont know if it is improvement or damage. But as nothing has ever improved in any animals, no new organs, functions etc, then we could say it is damaging, or maybe modifying, but not into creating better species.

  • Vicko says, "I have no time to search about it on internet"

    Don't bother yourself trying to find it. It's impossible to find that which does not exist.

  • Mitochondrial DNA stays, other DNA changes.

    When you stop using syllogism to fit your theories and realise that regardless of what you believe, facts cannot be overcome by beliefs, then you might find realism.

    Good luck to ya.

  • I don't believe in God. I don't believe in the eternal self. But I do believe existence itself is eternal. if that makes any sense at all. haha.

  • I requested this video!

    =p

    Not disappointed. Although I would argue that you dont need some dogma, or guide book, even Taoism in order to live a moral life. You can be atheist, and love your family and friends, and you can be religious and fly planes into buildings or molest little boys.

  • When did you decide this is your religion. Last week?

  • nope 3.5 years ago

  • roman catholic theolegy is a cult its not christian if u wer christian u would know that

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more