at 18:37 he says that b = e if k =1 / M(2) and then moves on without explaining what he means by that. so if you take the equation kfprime (0) = kM(2) , it becomes kfprime = 1/M(2) x M(2), which is kfprime = 1. i don't really get what this accomplishes in terms of defining e. definitely agree with the other commenter that this is an extremely confusing way of explaining it.
This guy screwed up at 26:27 by by using d(e^w)/dw = e^w, which is the exact conclusion he needs to prove. He should've calculated derivative of ln(x) using definition of derivative. Then he can find derivative of e^x using inverse function derivative property. Can't believe this is MIT.
I so badly want to write on that blackboard only to erase using that amazing "eraser" (am I correct calling that an "eraser"? My english is prety poor). I've never seen these things SO large. I'm going to get one of them for my own teaching.
I think he got lost in this lesson, he should have use the propiertes of ln and make the equation lny=lna^x and then use the chain rule and implicit diferentiation and he would have finish right away
I love mathematics, because I like true reasoning, the problem seems to be the language, I told my friends that I saw more truth in 3dMax of Autodesk because its language is perfect, they use objects, transformation, parameters, functions... but all these words are always in the right place, here I have no problems understanding, geometry, algebra, arithmetic, the problem arises when different variables come into the ecuation and notations are not rigurous such as confusing a line with a plane
God I don't know if I am crazy, but when he goes around with a demonstration which takes hours and he pases over a figure such as saying :"the slope of a exp to x where x=0 and we know that a exp 0 is equal to 1. right there what could it be easier.
i enjoyed this seminar very much. from the very beginning there was a crescendo building towards the end where the climax had arrived and the meaning of e and ln were understood.
@blakescello If you use iPhone, then open a browser and go to wolframalpha and search for Limit[(1 + 1/n)^n, x -> Infinity] or just lim_(x->infinity) (1+1/n)^n.
Great series and lecturer. Only thing that bothers me is how math instruction always insists on teaching the general abstract proofs at the VERY BEGINNING of the lecture which makes everything so confusing. It's a logically correct method but on a practical level silly.
It would be much easier for the iniate to first be presented straight with the equation, practice a couple of exercises first, and then afterwards show how it's proof is derived.
I took Calculus some 20 years ago !! Young people today have it made. Once you went home with your textbook in the old days you were on your own to figure things out.
I also like this teacher. I am listening to these lectures for the fun of it given my math is very rusty. I want to get back into physics ... so I need to polish up my math.
@Vegasred125 I am so sick of hearing about how the youth of today have it made. Boo hoo, did you walk both ways to school uphill too? Get over it. Better yet, get over yourself.
I agree. The problem with folks back then is that something that was obviously simple was made difficult to justify their supposed intelligence. Calculus and basically nothing is hard if explained CORRECTLY. Descartes said this many centuries.
@floppyorange Me too, I'm tired about today's youth have it made. The problem is that these OLD ROTTING FOSSILIZED CORPSES of yesteryear believe that nonsense. They're all just right wing "pick yourself up by your bootstrap" fanatics, LOL.
@Vegasred125 Seems like its not just young people who have it made.....old snobs who cant remember what they were taught are getting alot out of it too
@HyperBorealOperator (First of all, I don´t speak english as a native language, so, sorry for my mistakes) I think that is kinda stupid to criticize these videos that are free, I mean, if Somebody were paying it would be ok to give "not flattering" comments...
There is a expression in my country "A caballo regalado, no le mires el diente" (Never look a gift horse in the mouth)
This is free men/woman...don´t worry, I know you are just making a observation and not criticizing
Single variable calculus (aka Calculus I and II) is equivalent to AP Calc AB and BC.
In AB, there is material from Calc I and a bit from Calc II. In BC, the material revisits Calc I to some extent (that's why there's a B in the course names AB and BC) and then covers the Calc II material.
Calculus III (multivariable) is not covered in high school because most students don't reach that far (the ones that do might take a special class or they enroll in a college class while in high school).
Does anybody know which lecture actually contains hyperbolic functions? The class notes and these videos are a year off so they don't really correspond as well as they should. But I don't think MIT would skip a section in a foundations math course... Any MIT students know? Thanks.
You won't find this in the video lectures, I'm afraid. I thought I saw a brief review in the notes from the MIT site, but I'm probably mistaken since you said you checked them out already. I purchased the textbook and it definitely has a good review. The textbook is not cheap, though. . .
Comment removed
keonlo123 5 days ago
the limit of the log is the log of the lim
GuitarShredda99 2 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always Exponential and log
AntoMelta 2 weeks ago
Nice Video Logarithmic differentiation hyperbolic functions That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 2 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video Exponential and log From Your
imegatrone 2 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing differentiation hyperbolic functions
bundawartini 2 weeks ago
at the end he says that the limit is equal "1" so how that equials to e^1 !? doesn't it supposed to be e^0 ?
stavrospod 3 weeks ago
great video, you're one of the best lecturers i've found on youtube!
rydvalj 3 weeks ago
Is Saying: "the Square Root of Two", Redundant?
mdgreg 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@mdgreg , Looked At What I Said, Pretty Stupid.
mdgreg 1 month ago
This is very useful. Very relevant to students like me.
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
at 18:37 he says that b = e if k =1 / M(2) and then moves on without explaining what he means by that. so if you take the equation kfprime (0) = kM(2) , it becomes kfprime = 1/M(2) x M(2), which is kfprime = 1. i don't really get what this accomplishes in terms of defining e. definitely agree with the other commenter that this is an extremely confusing way of explaining it.
channeling1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys I beg you that you help me out with this lecture.This is the 10th time i'am watching this.I understood only the first 4 steps.Please...
treeandplant 3 months ago
Guys I beg you that you help me out with this lecture.This is the 10th time i'am watching this.I understood only the first 4 steps.
treeandplant 3 months ago
dat chain rule....
toxzen 8 months ago 4
This guy screwed up at 26:27 by by using d(e^w)/dw = e^w, which is the exact conclusion he needs to prove. He should've calculated derivative of ln(x) using definition of derivative. Then he can find derivative of e^x using inverse function derivative property. Can't believe this is MIT.
joy2000cyber 8 months ago
i so badly want to write on that board with that piece of chalk :P it looks so nice to write with
tikilikiboomboom93 8 months ago
@tikilikiboomboom93
I so badly want to write on that blackboard only to erase using that amazing "eraser" (am I correct calling that an "eraser"? My english is prety poor). I've never seen these things SO large. I'm going to get one of them for my own teaching.
rockandswing1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no wonder this is free...
mikestmars 9 months ago
I think he got lost in this lesson, he should have use the propiertes of ln and make the equation lny=lna^x and then use the chain rule and implicit diferentiation and he would have finish right away
santiagogcastro 9 months ago
I love mathematics, because I like true reasoning, the problem seems to be the language, I told my friends that I saw more truth in 3dMax of Autodesk because its language is perfect, they use objects, transformation, parameters, functions... but all these words are always in the right place, here I have no problems understanding, geometry, algebra, arithmetic, the problem arises when different variables come into the ecuation and notations are not rigurous such as confusing a line with a plane
santiagogcastro 9 months ago
God I don't know if I am crazy, but when he goes around with a demonstration which takes hours and he pases over a figure such as saying :"the slope of a exp to x where x=0 and we know that a exp 0 is equal to 1. right there what could it be easier.
santiagogcastro 9 months ago
I like his bigass chalk.
ScoNate 10 months ago 3
i enjoyed this seminar very much. from the very beginning there was a crescendo building towards the end where the climax had arrived and the meaning of e and ln were understood.
amapmwt 10 months ago
To Keep straight :
If w=lnx then e^w =w. And then w=lnx and e^ln x=x
Osman9100 10 months ago
@blakescello If you use iPhone, then open a browser and go to wolframalpha and search for Limit[(1 + 1/n)^n, x -> Infinity] or just lim_(x->infinity) (1+1/n)^n.
MargusMartsepp 1 year ago
The natural log explanation (21-27:~) was absolutely fantastic!!!
izadk 1 year ago
nerds
coolboy93smokingeyy 1 year ago
He's an ok teacher. He certainly doesn't hold your hand with this shit.
Muffinfordinner 1 year ago
I hate how he ends everything with a period. You're not writing sentences, prof.
MrHinderance 1 year ago
@MrHinderance Math is the universal language!!! :D
KwameNewton 1 year ago
I've been watching these lectures and this is my favorite so far. To finish with the numerical calculation of the "mystery number" e was brilliant.
EdwardCurrent 1 year ago
black boards are beautiful
baaroodii 1 year ago 2
you write faster than i can type
rune500125 1 year ago 2
thata was great video!!!!!!! you are awesome!! thanks very much
sandi0688 1 year ago
This is the best explanation of e that I have ever met.
comecra85 1 year ago
did he even prove the derivative of e^x ?
kauboibiboppu 1 year ago
the way he solved that limit at the end by using the derivative was absolutely brilliant : ) thx : D
evox1991 1 year ago
Comment removed
8581741 1 year ago
My native language isn't English, but this prof explains things so well that I feel like he's from my country.
Lithiumz 1 year ago
Diffrerentiation of logarithmic and exponential functions.
suinthemat 1 year ago
I <3 MIT
DBangaDon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Did you hear of the new approach to Calculus?
There IS new math!!!
Just type "Simple Calculus" in youtube and the first result is an introductory lecture.
amiruchka 1 year ago
Great series and lecturer. Only thing that bothers me is how math instruction always insists on teaching the general abstract proofs at the VERY BEGINNING of the lecture which makes everything so confusing. It's a logically correct method but on a practical level silly.
It would be much easier for the iniate to first be presented straight with the equation, practice a couple of exercises first, and then afterwards show how it's proof is derived.
dmokhtar 1 year ago
I like this guy.
Mzimzim 1 year ago
This is very informative!! It makes me eager to go to class again tomorrow!!
payroll6278 1 year ago
Someone message me if they want to work through some of these problem sets. OCW >= College
pcarron2 2 years ago
I took Calculus some 20 years ago !! Young people today have it made. Once you went home with your textbook in the old days you were on your own to figure things out.
I also like this teacher. I am listening to these lectures for the fun of it given my math is very rusty. I want to get back into physics ... so I need to polish up my math.
Vegasred125 2 years ago 18
For some of us this isnt enough =/. I actually have to sit in the library for hours to figure things out not all of us have it made ... Sadly
humper3000 2 years ago
@Vegasred125 I am so sick of hearing about how the youth of today have it made. Boo hoo, did you walk both ways to school uphill too? Get over it. Better yet, get over yourself.
floppyorange 2 years ago
I agree. The problem with folks back then is that something that was obviously simple was made difficult to justify their supposed intelligence. Calculus and basically nothing is hard if explained CORRECTLY. Descartes said this many centuries.
josecitomadera 1 year ago
@floppyorange Me too, I'm tired about today's youth have it made. The problem is that these OLD ROTTING FOSSILIZED CORPSES of yesteryear believe that nonsense. They're all just right wing "pick yourself up by your bootstrap" fanatics, LOL.
josecitomadera 1 year ago
@Vegasred125 We'll say similar to our offspring in 20 years.
rarejd 6 months ago
@Vegasred125 good i like the the spirit.I'am 27 and would like to learn math from the scratch!!.Are you on twitter by the way?
treeandplant 2 months ago
@Vegasred125 Seems like its not just young people who have it made.....old snobs who cant remember what they were taught are getting alot out of it too
smileyj 1 month ago
i watch 3 lectures of his every week. This is amazing.
roodawgy 2 years ago 3
@HyperBorealOperator (First of all, I don´t speak english as a native language, so, sorry for my mistakes) I think that is kinda stupid to criticize these videos that are free, I mean, if Somebody were paying it would be ok to give "not flattering" comments...
There is a expression in my country "A caballo regalado, no le mires el diente" (Never look a gift horse in the mouth)
This is free men/woman...don´t worry, I know you are just making a observation and not criticizing
gavilanch 2 years ago 3
Damn, this prof. is great!
LV07TSK 2 years ago 3
i hope i get accepted by mit =)
liusinger 2 years ago
Comment removed
mathfunk 2 years ago
evaluating lim (1+(1/n))^n for n = 1,000,000,000,000 just crashed my iPhone
blakescello 2 years ago 31
@blakescello
Bahahaha Made in China!!!
LogicalFlawDetector 1 year ago
@blakescello Works on a TI-89 Titanium.
666modac1 11 months ago
This teacher is really the best! Many thanks to him.
panda20091 2 years ago
would single variable calculus be calc AB
and multivariable calculus be calc BC in high school level?
woodmaster413 2 years ago
Single variable calculus (aka Calculus I and II) is equivalent to AP Calc AB and BC.
In AB, there is material from Calc I and a bit from Calc II. In BC, the material revisits Calc I to some extent (that's why there's a B in the course names AB and BC) and then covers the Calc II material.
Calculus III (multivariable) is not covered in high school because most students don't reach that far (the ones that do might take a special class or they enroll in a college class while in high school).
scigamerfan07 2 years ago
Does anybody know which lecture actually contains hyperbolic functions? The class notes and these videos are a year off so they don't really correspond as well as they should. But I don't think MIT would skip a section in a foundations math course... Any MIT students know? Thanks.
maodvdiiect 2 years ago
You won't find this in the video lectures, I'm afraid. I thought I saw a brief review in the notes from the MIT site, but I'm probably mistaken since you said you checked them out already. I purchased the textbook and it definitely has a good review. The textbook is not cheap, though. . .
blakescello 2 years ago
@maodvdiiect hyperbolic functions aren't so important
bgreeson 1 year ago
that the most convoluted explanation for what "e" is. I now feel like i don't understand it.
3xor3 2 years ago 2
Haha i agree. Instead of convoluted he called it circular...no wait "circuitous"...lmao!!
yyeppesz 2 years ago
thank you!
wish i have money to donate ;)
nohyaya 2 years ago 3
One of my fav!!!
Owleyes888 2 years ago
Thank you, MIT, for posting these.
PianoWallaby 2 years ago
Awesome
danrah7 2 years ago