Exw Crysis videos sto logariasmo mou alla oxi HD. To Crysis benchmark mou eixe bgalei 53.41FPS se 1680X1050 DX9. Shmera 3anadokimasa se kainourio mobo kai CPU kai mou ebgale 59.50fps kai kapou 43FPS se DX10. Auta mallon 8a ta grayw se HD video kai 8a ta anebasw 3ana.
That's all the options you get when running under DX9. Nevertheless it runs the same under DX10. The other option are not important anyway. They real burden comes from AF and AA.
And no i don't use more that 4XAA ever, if that's what you meant. Sorry! Anyway the title specifically underlines that.
ok lemme summarize this up... yes ati has the best single/dualgpu solution, but if your saying who can provide the fastest config? which always a question asked..., nvidia wins that part...
Look, i agree that if you want the absolute fastest, then yes Nvidia it is. But dude, lets get's serious. The cost is just too great.Too much money and too much consumption.Also let me remind you that the 4870X2 in CFX (4 gpus) has yet to show it's true scaling. Need i remind you that the 4870X2's sideport remains disabled?
Also the GT200 is 576mm^2 worth of gpu surface, while 2Xrv770 measures 520mm^2. So with less die size ATI manages to beat Nvidia's flagship, by even 100% in some games!
but if you use every slot which sli or crossfire was intended for, nvidia wins with 3 way gtx 280 or quad 4870x2's. Nvidia is still king in overall...
U obviously don't own a 4870X2.. The card is simply amazing. Right now no game really requires 4870X2's in crossfire. Ati has really stepped up their game this year.
then go talk to ati about the environment im sure there are about hundreds of wasteful things they have made into their gpu's and amd's processors... BTW nvidia still wins like said for the last 10 fuckin times now...
its called using less stream processors, basicaly less hardware and on top of that, they will start adding the 55nm to most of their cards now and i know ati did it first, but nvidia has always found out a way to win with little resources...
How does Nvidia win ? Did u personally benchmark both brands ? Did u buy or use each model and test it in every application ? Im pretty sure u didnt do any of the above. All im saying is that both brands r awesome just this year Ati has come up with more better n cost effective cards.
have you not looked through the last comments i have said? nvidia wins because they have the fastest most SINGLE GPU ever and to make the 4870 x2 better than the gtx 280, you have to put it in crossfire so of course dual gpu beats single gpu but when you put 3 gtx 280's together against 2 4870x2's the gtx 280's still win...
You can't have good scaling with more than 2 GPUs with the current technology. Three 4870X2 would have six GPUs, so the performance will be awful.One is enough! ;)
no you would need about 1600w but since they really base games around Nvidia's architecture, 3 way sli is 2.84X better than a single card which is good enough for me... (3 9800 GTX+'s in 3 way sli soon...)
My 4850 gives 61.057fps at 1920X1080 4XAA while my 4870X2 gives 90.522 at the same resolution, measured with fraps.
Are you sure you get 55-60fps on a single 8800GT? 55-60fps does not seem like an accurate measurement. Did you bench with fraps? Not to mention that the 4850 beats GTX 260 in Grid let alone the 8800GT. See techreports review. Youtube does not leave me to post the link! WTF???!!
Anyway i think you would be better off with a second 8800GT. No need to spend so much money! ;)
I put it on high and when the game is restarted it defaults to medium by itself. I don't know why this is happening. The same happens for both my 4850 and my 4870X2 and i'm using GRID version 1.2 with latest drivers.
I am still testing it. There are some childhood ilnesses though. Fear not. They will be fixed. Flat out Ultimate Carnage and Grid, only play well under Vista64 with Catalyst 8.8. Vista32 and Xp, give out about 30fps. Obviously ATI prioritised the 64bit OS, which is very interesting to say the least.
You can see the rest of my videos. There are more coming up, in due time.
46bit is better if u have 2 g card and 4 g or 2 g in ram 32bit only sees 3.5g so if u have more then 4 its going to run slower then 64bit witch can 16g or more
tpt dude ;) na sai kala
na se rwtisw
se Crysis exeis dokimasei na mas peis fps?
se HD etsi oxi moufies ;p
Re4cTiV3 3 years ago
Exw Crysis videos sto logariasmo mou alla oxi HD. To Crysis benchmark mou eixe bgalei 53.41FPS se 1680X1050 DX9. Shmera 3anadokimasa se kainourio mobo kai CPU kai mou ebgale 59.50fps kai kapou 43FPS se DX10. Auta mallon 8a ta grayw se HD video kai 8a ta anebasw 3ana.
toutagamon 3 years ago
if you have 4870x2 use whell like logitech g25and fraps please lol...
astrafan85 3 years ago
Fraps is no good for the purpose of the videos i am making.I am just showing the performance. Not the graphics and certainly not my gaming skills.
;)
toutagamon 3 years ago
PHILIPS 9603D
gamath tv tsakalako :)
+egw authn exw :)
diavasa t review s ...sugxaritiria polu wraio
PANJOSS 3 years ago
Euxaristw file!:D
Einai ontws polu kalh! Anebhke h Philips sthn upolhyh moy me auth thn TV!
toutagamon 3 years ago
auta einai :)
cineos rulezzZzzZ
oOoooOoooOootan parw new pc h 4870x2 tha einai kalodexoumenh :D:D:D
egw esteila to link ston "Panjoss" gia na dei to review ;P
ta fps vlepw varane 70aria kai 80aria etsi auta einai :)
As a result, wraio video, good job!
Re4cTiV3 3 years ago
Thanks guys! Einai ontws polu dunath. Duskoleuomai na 3ekollhsw apo to PC pleon! :P
Kala, ta video prin thn HD camera den einai kai polu kala, alla ekana oti mporousa. Me to kinhto ta egraya! :(
Gia th seira 5000 omws 8a grafoun ola se HD! :D
toutagamon 3 years ago
Cool video!
arvutihull 3 years ago
dude that wasnt all the way up.... turn the shit up
MXhm91 3 years ago
That's all the options you get when running under DX9. Nevertheless it runs the same under DX10. The other option are not important anyway. They real burden comes from AF and AA.
And no i don't use more that 4XAA ever, if that's what you meant. Sorry! Anyway the title specifically underlines that.
toutagamon 3 years ago
yeah but as i said as only 1 4870x2 to 1 to 2 gtx 280's beats it. and amd consumes more than you think than nvidia...
mda40000 3 years ago
Ok some new info. Go to PCGH and read the article about 4870X2 CFX vs GTX280 SLI and 3SLI running on core i7. You will be surprised! ;)
toutagamon 3 years ago
ok lemme summarize this up... yes ati has the best single/dualgpu solution, but if your saying who can provide the fastest config? which always a question asked..., nvidia wins that part...
mda40000 3 years ago
Look, i agree that if you want the absolute fastest, then yes Nvidia it is. But dude, lets get's serious. The cost is just too great.Too much money and too much consumption.Also let me remind you that the 4870X2 in CFX (4 gpus) has yet to show it's true scaling. Need i remind you that the 4870X2's sideport remains disabled?
Also the GT200 is 576mm^2 worth of gpu surface, while 2Xrv770 measures 520mm^2. So with less die size ATI manages to beat Nvidia's flagship, by even 100% in some games!
toutagamon 3 years ago
go watch trubritar's video if you have to...
mda40000 3 years ago
but if you use every slot which sli or crossfire was intended for, nvidia wins with 3 way gtx 280 or quad 4870x2's. Nvidia is still king in overall...
mda40000 3 years ago
U obviously don't own a 4870X2.. The card is simply amazing. Right now no game really requires 4870X2's in crossfire. Ati has really stepped up their game this year.
niceguya1ways 3 years ago
then go talk to ati about the environment im sure there are about hundreds of wasteful things they have made into their gpu's and amd's processors... BTW nvidia still wins like said for the last 10 fuckin times now...
mda40000 3 years ago
How Nvidia wins, actually?
And care to explain how Nvidia is more environmental friendly?
toutagamon 3 years ago
its called using less stream processors, basicaly less hardware and on top of that, they will start adding the 55nm to most of their cards now and i know ati did it first, but nvidia has always found out a way to win with little resources...
mda40000 3 years ago
How does Nvidia win ? Did u personally benchmark both brands ? Did u buy or use each model and test it in every application ? Im pretty sure u didnt do any of the above. All im saying is that both brands r awesome just this year Ati has come up with more better n cost effective cards.
niceguya1ways 3 years ago
have you not looked through the last comments i have said? nvidia wins because they have the fastest most SINGLE GPU ever and to make the 4870 x2 better than the gtx 280, you have to put it in crossfire so of course dual gpu beats single gpu but when you put 3 gtx 280's together against 2 4870x2's the gtx 280's still win...
mda40000 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi to play games at full hd 1080p on the 4870x2 do u have to have a hd monitor or tv or will a hdmi screen play it at full hd.
thanks
snake786123 3 years ago
lol,i saw skid marks in the options mode
vincentisais555 3 years ago
it would have been realy cool if you can put three hd 4870x2 in one machine (sorry for my english)
vlekkietwinnie 3 years ago
You can't have good scaling with more than 2 GPUs with the current technology. Three 4870X2 would have six GPUs, so the performance will be awful.One is enough! ;)
toutagamon 3 years ago
i know but if you think about it is cool
vlekkietwinnie 3 years ago
well someone has put 4 for 8 gpus, just google it...
DeceptiveWarrior 3 years ago
and then u would need 2000w PSU also :)
EstonianComputerGeek 3 years ago
no you would need about 1600w but since they really base games around Nvidia's architecture, 3 way sli is 2.84X better than a single card which is good enough for me... (3 9800 GTX+'s in 3 way sli soon...)
mda40000 3 years ago
Well judging by the benchmarks floating the web, i didn't see BIOSHOCK, CONAN, CALL OF JUAREZ and many other, being THAT "Nvidia friendly".
The 4870 kicks the GTX 260 in the butt and the GTX 280 vs the 4870X2 is a comedy by itself!
toutagamon 3 years ago
i can play that game at the same setting with the 8800gt everything full 1920x1200 16af
4xaa i get avg frame of 55-60
whats your fps like because i was thinking of getting this or 2x 216gtx maxcore
ik9111 3 years ago
My 4850 gives 61.057fps at 1920X1080 4XAA while my 4870X2 gives 90.522 at the same resolution, measured with fraps.
Are you sure you get 55-60fps on a single 8800GT? 55-60fps does not seem like an accurate measurement. Did you bench with fraps? Not to mention that the 4850 beats GTX 260 in Grid let alone the 8800GT. See techreports review. Youtube does not leave me to post the link! WTF???!!
Anyway i think you would be better off with a second 8800GT. No need to spend so much money! ;)
toutagamon 3 years ago
why u have the reflection on medium?
luongdung 3 years ago
I put it on high and when the game is restarted it defaults to medium by itself. I don't know why this is happening. The same happens for both my 4850 and my 4870X2 and i'm using GRID version 1.2 with latest drivers.
toutagamon 3 years ago
I am still testing it. There are some childhood ilnesses though. Fear not. They will be fixed. Flat out Ultimate Carnage and Grid, only play well under Vista64 with Catalyst 8.8. Vista32 and Xp, give out about 30fps. Obviously ATI prioritised the 64bit OS, which is very interesting to say the least.
You can see the rest of my videos. There are more coming up, in due time.
toutagamon 3 years ago
46bit is better if u have 2 g card and 4 g or 2 g in ram 32bit only sees 3.5g so if u have more then 4 its going to run slower then 64bit witch can 16g or more
TrivSkip 3 years ago
The lagging of Flat out or any other game is not a matter of RAM. I still have 2.58GBs available under 32bit OSes.
I found out that "problematic" games run better in XP if i disable Catalyst AI. Meaning one core is disabled, meaning the driver needs fixing.;)
toutagamon 3 years ago
dude, i'm about to get this card tomorrow. Is it really as good as people say? Cause it looks insane!
PhilyP 3 years ago