how do you get a tesla card to work with a geforce? i dont want to have to sink the money into a quadro card, and a friend of mine gave me a tesla card for cheap.
the nividia tesla isnt a graphics card you idiots its a prossescor you have to have a seperate graghics card all the nivida tesla does is make your computer as fast as super computers medical reserachers use and people who are looking for oil but the nivida tesla can be used for gaming
@300ceres Technically, the Tesla can be used for gaming. You'll just need something to output the display. Basically with the Tesla, you'll just be running your games in CPU rendering mode. Normally, CPU rendering of any modern game would be super slow, maybe half a frame per second even for the most powerful Core i7 CPU's. But with Tesla, it'd be a walk in the park.
i gotta say, this guy is a 0superDICK0 dont know how to play the game, dont know how to film the game, SUPERDICK, YOUR FIRED!! go spend 2 grand on a brain implant NOT ANOTHER FUCKIN TESLA CARD YOU WASTED MY VALUABLE VIDEO WATCHING TIME LEARN HOW TO PLAY, LEARN HOW TO BENCHMARK ARGG OMG THAT VIDEO WAS PAIN!!!! BITCH!
@ttolmbrftttwtbopat the tesla parallel processor doesnt work like that its strictly made for adding huge processing power to the computers 3d applications i still dont get how he got it to run with crysis thru his other video card but its possible to do i just dont have the money to mess with one of these
@PsiloCybinDreamX The newest Tesla cards have a video out. Look for the Tesla C2050 on amazon. It will but you out $2,400 but will provide more computational power than four GTX 580s. But honestly, what they were designed for was extreme parallel processing, not gaming.
If your kernel is limited by single precision, integer, or memory bandwidth performance, you will find the Tesla to be slower than a GTX 480 or 580. If you are limited by double precision performance, then Tesla will be faster.You should not buy Tesla for raw computational performance (except double precision), but rather because you want the other features: Better QA testing for 24/7 use, more memory, ECC, bidirectional DMA transfers over the PCI-Express bus and so on and so on.
@efendulov Absolutely correct! If you look at my videos, youll find my "High End Computer" there with 3x C1060 (will be replaced with the new C2070 next week) and a GTX 480. Alot of people compare the cards with graphic cards which is absolutely wrong. if you use / develope CUDA Software, a graphic card cant compare to a Tesla. Sure you get a good performance on CUDA with a graphic card too, but if you want perfection and the best performance you get, there is no way around Tesla Cards.
Guys, Crysis use the Tesla Cards only in Developer Mode, not in the actual game. But what wonders me is that you "only" get 150-300 FPS. I get with 3 Tesla´s and 1 GTX 480 around 1200 FPS. See the actual Hardware Setup in my video.
@efendulov Actually he is in Germany. He just edits videos. He is not even playing the game. Any game's FPS will skyrocket while you are just sitting there doing nothing. We don't even really know if he even is really using Tesla cards. He just placed a picture of one of nVidia's custom builds in the video. In addition, the c1060 are cards that plug into a desktop case just like a regular video card. Why is he showing us a rack?
@trentcreek Tesla Cards are not even designed for gaming. If you look at my videos, youll find my setup which I have at home for work with 3 Tesla C1060. Its just funny that almost everybody thinks that there designed for gaming. ;) Crysis 2 will support tesla Cards both within Developer Mode and the actual game. And with all settings maxed out you´ll get around 700 FPS with my setup. ^^ But anyway, there not designed for gaming.
@williamkendrick Not really correct. The C2070 which I ordered couple of days ago are more powerfull then a GTX 580. You just need to go away from comparing a Tesla Card with a graphic card. For example, the ECC RAM on a Tesla card is much more efficient then the RAM on a regular card. And the differences are huge.
@TheWhistlerCode idiot. just like the talk about 64 vs 32, you idiots always read the wrong things. in CRUNCHING, RAM MATTERS LITTLE. for awhile, tesla crads didn't even have double precision, and b eating out my card doesn't suddenly mean you got the rest of my setup beat. EVER. i mean yeah its nice, but its cheaper and more wattage effective to go lower than tesla, sorry. its a good card but no one wants it. any of the teslas.
@williamkendrick Tesla card support double precision, dont talk shit if you dont even have a clue. ;) i work with CUDA software I wrote myself and I use double precision. It worked with the C1060 and the C2070 so where the hell you take your "dangerouse" knowledge? Take a look at the specsheets of the Tesla Cards.
@TheWhistlerCode i'll say again, idiot, RAM MATTERS LITTLE IN CRUNCHING. and if you're buying all that hardware for seti... like you said...? i feel for your existance.
@williamkendrick You seem to be the idiot, because I never saied with one single word that I bought all that stuff for SETI. And why you keep on riding on the RAM matter? Do yourself a favor and start learn reading and understand the differences. A shame that a 28 year old have to tell that a 33 old. Jesus, if I´m that stupid in 5 years, I would kill myself. -.-
@TheWhistlerCode then please, kill yourself. also, t hats exactly what you said in your video on your page, moron. also, you're one ugly motherfucker. so please, go ahead and kill yourself. i wont mind at all. also, i'm n ot 33, thats my friend, we use the same account...a nd i think thats the FIRST time i have mentioned that in my entire time on youtube; that this is a multiple person account, any at least 4 people who have been working on gpgpus for years are laughing at your setup...lol
@williamkendrick STUPID IDIOT! I said "righ now it runs BOINT" I didnt said with one word that its bought exclusively for SETI. He cantr read and cant listen.
@williamkendrick one more thing, loser.... whats your designation,do you work for intel, amd/ati (well not anymore anyway..), cray, or anyone significant? didn't think so. you're just another loser on the internet that read a few forum posts, and think that that qualifies you for something... just how long h ave you been working with server architecture, moron? cuz thats what you have. its not a high end pc dumbass, it's a server, and to call it anything else, just shows your 'experience'
@williamkendrick First its not a serverm its a woirkstation. And when it comes to my job, you shouldnt care about it. And about my knowledge of serverarchitecture, I´ll bet you a million dollar, that my knowledge its far beond yours. I´f youre in germany, come over to cologne and I´ll proof it.
i dont give one rats ass where you work. your knowledge isn't even remotely on the same level as me. i'm not gonna talk about this anymore. just because my son trolled you doesn't mean you know more than *I* DO.
back off.
i'm now blocking you from further contacting us. i already explained to your stupid ass that this is a multiple user account; no one cares about your opinion. btw, thats not a workstation idiot
@williamkendrick Maybe you should stop playing MMORPGS so much. You never explained in one post that this is a multiple user account but yea, keep on playing MMORPGS. Jesus....
@TheWhistlerCode who the fuck said anything about mmorpgs? what the fuck are you ON? YEAH i TOLD YOU I DIDNT EXPLAIN IT WAS A MULTIPLE DUMBASS. why did i even bother to respond? keep making shitty 'workstations', noob. lolol.
@williamkendrick Well if you forget what you post on the net, its nit my problem. Take a look at your profile. And about my shitty workstation: "Auf dieses Video antworten... Verbleibende Zeichen
Abbrechen oder Posten
oder Videoantwort erstellen * funny! finally a blogger that has a RIDICULOUS SETUP! god i only WISH i had four gpgpu's! i have a nice setup for a pc, but not compared to you man! williamkendrick vor 1 Tag "
Now you get 120 fps with just 2 old radeon 5970s .... for like 80 times less value than this machine.. its insane how fast things improve!!!! like a gtx 480 for just 270 euros ... XD.. and thats allready 1.35 Gflops 1 card!!!! for 270 euros
This is nice and all but why the fuck does it have 3GB of mem and a 580 only have 1.5GB? they are the same size. I want a 3GB gfx card damn. Or like I said else where. Take advantage of sli. Make one card nothing more then just 2 gpu's no mem, and another card just memory. The mem card could hold like an easy 12GB. Or even if you wanted, have a normal card sli'd up to a memory card. Stuff like that.
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
Retard is your stupid father, that married your stupid mother, that had a stupid child, you. We don't have to be mean, just say what you think to know , ok?! I don't need to be insultated by jerks like you. THIS tesla. is worse than the ATI HD 5970, just do the benchmarks. I did, you moron!
This video sucks, NONE spec could do 300fps in Crysis, not even 4x 5970OC, and a i7. This frame rate you got it's cuz your pc is not processing anithing. I've done the SAME THING with a GF 6800 and I got 70~ frames in high. This sucks, man! you people are getting fooled by this jerk
@Bioh4zardGaming buuull! Tesla C1060 # of Streaming Processor Cores 240 (Hd5970= 3200) Tesla C1060 Memory Bandwidth 102 GB/sec (Hd 5970= 256 GB/s) ; # of Tesla GPUs 1 (hd5970 = 2 ) ;tesla C1060 Memory Speed 800MHz (HD5970 = 1000Mhz GDDR5 agains GDDR3 of tesla), so, don't try to say this tesla is twice better than 5970, you dont get a shit about GPU's
@TheAmarildo666 um excuse me i have owned 5970s and the memory bandwith is not 256gb/s its 128 look it up on tweak town and no its not 3200 real cores some do light texturing and some do med and high so its not really 3200 also these cards do a teraflo a peice so eight of them would bve 8 teraflops vs 2 5970s doing 4 please before you start trolling youtube look at some benchmarks of supercomputing numbers and better yet look at some gdc 2010 videos that my whack your ass into shape
@Bioh4zardGaming oh yeah, it is 3200, 1600 per core. the only thing I was wrong was about the bandwith is not 256gb/s its 128 really. buut, 5970 pwn the tesla.
@TheAmarildo666 u retard! the Tesla is a GPGPU, which can process basically anything that a CPU does, the ATI only does calculation to accelerate the CPU performance even with OpenCL it won't replace the Tesla anytime soon.
@ykliu1995 Ok, a PC's CPU and any GPU out there are completely different architectures. So you're comparing apples and oranges.
Also any specific code a Tesla could run any other GeForce 8000/ Radieon HD2000 series or newer GPU could run, albeit slower being not specifically tooled for mass computation. All OpenCL is doing is opening up GPGPU functions to be easier to program for and to allow any ARM-9 GPU to use them.
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
if you use a system with 1 Nvidia tesla c/m2070, 1 quadro 6000 and 2 Geforce GTX 480 together in quad sli and a i7 processor you can max crysis out with 200-400Fps
@0supermaster0 Not really correct, I´ve tested it out with my old configiuration (look at my videos) and I had around 1800 FPS. never tested it out with the new Fermi Tesla´s but I will give it a try this weekend.
@0supermaster0 i know, it's only like 2-10% faster than tri-sli and sometime it can take too much power from your suply so that the orther cards don't get enough and thats when you lose performance with quad-sli(4way not 2xdualcore)
@rawrEvan Now take your eyes of of the red dot and concentrate on one of the far extents (left OR right) of the bar's range, while changing the frame rate. Then concentrate on the opposite extent. Notice how the actual range didn't change? Thus our erroneous perception (while focusing on the dot) occurs because meaningful data is being omitted(ignored).
Thanks for supporting my original statement and disproving arguments to the contrary!
@rawrEvan I viewed your latest link, and played with all the settings. All of which helped to prove that our brains receive information at a fixed rate and that once that rate is exceeded our brains ignore more and more of the incoming information.
To wit: focus on the red dot while increasing the frame rate. Notice how the range (left to right) of the bar decreases. Same thing happens as you drive faster and faster. Your eyes still see the periphery but your brain ignores that information.
The whole point is the fluidity of the motion. The blank spaces in which the bar isn't seen is due to the limitiations of the monitor not refreshing enough. Most monitors only refresh 60 times per second (60HZ). The monitor is not a perfect display in order to judge what the brain comprehends in regards to how many frames are comprehend, but this is irrelevant. The perceived fluidity of the motion is hte point.
@rawrEvan ok, lemme see if i actually understand you,... you argue against a statement i made by posting a link to a website which contains nothing but rambling incomprehensible gibberish and then once you are confronted by the absurdity of your tactic you attempt to save face by admitting you "don't like" that website. Did you bother to view the site or understand the nonsense therein, before you used that site as the foundation for your argument and before you implied someone else was a moron?
So basically what I'm saying and what I've been trying to say is frames aren't comparable to the way the human eye receives information. You can't really draw any consistent conclusions. There have been tests showing more sensitivity towards changes in light than in changes in colours and even moreso with certain colours.
But as far as gaming is concerned, 60 fps is just fine.
@rawrEvan "Haven't you ever looked at 120hz/240hz screens at a store?" You do know that 120 Hz monitors/tv's receive data at 60 Hz, don't you? It displays at 120 Hz by examining two successive 1 Hz periods and "inferring" what data would be displayed during a 1 Hz "fake" period between the two actual periods. Haven't found anyone who likes the effect, but I haven't seen it myself.
There's a difference, if you can't see it, you probably aren't very good at games.
@rawrEvan "We also see blending of "frames" as a result, for example, quickly move your cursor around on the screen. You can see it appear to be in many places at once as you mentally blend "frames" together."
If the cursor appeared at many places at once, there would be no perception of motion but rather many replications of the same object instantaneously. The eyes do not see that as motion nor does the brain attempt to "blend" that as a perception of motion.
@rawrEvan Here's a gem from the website you linked to:
"Maybe the industry didn't add enough security factor to CDs and that's why many people still feel that analog is sometimes better. It's like in a room full of neon lights. You just know that something isn't right."
How many bottles of Jack do you have to down before your brain starts to spew this kind of shit?
And what kind of MORON holds this up, not for it's own sake but, to back his equally incoherent argument?
@rawrEvan O.K. let me see if I've got this straight. You belatedy enter an argument, refuting a statement by posting a link to a website. Said website proposes an endless stream of arguments, none of which relate to each other, to explain something the author clearly doesn't understand (or have much interest in) and ends up summarizing, contradicting the previously made arguments, with incoherent babble that is so random a crack addict would laugh at it's stupidty.
I don't know what you're accusing me of. Of course there's a difference, I never said anything contrary to that. In fact I even agreed with you that the eyes don't see in "frames", so who's the moron here?
@FBIAustria What I am seeing here is Crysis running with a better and more stable framerate than I have ever previously seen on a standard gaming PC.
Compability issues are likely the problem, I don't honestly know why no one has yet made a true gaming supercomputer, considering I think there is a huge market for it.
@epizowningyou Irrespective of what the human eye can see, which will vary from one individual to the next, our brains are wired for 60 Hz. Framerates above 60 will be harder and harder to detect once you've exceeded the brain's ability to process the incoming information. Even if the eye could detect movement at 2500 fps, it would be an absurd redundancy as the brain would ignore 97% of the information the eyes were receiving.
@epizowningyou You are comparing apples to oranges. A monitor's refresh rate is not the same as the frame rate of a motion picture. If you achieve 30 fps in a game while using an 120 Hz monitor, it just means each frame is drawn 4 times before the next frame is displayed.
Our brains are not "wired" for 60 hz because we don't process information in herz, or frames. It's a fluid, organic process. Maybe the reason you don't notice framerates over 60 fps is because you've only seen it on a 60 hz monitor.
@123IOWNALL321 Actually our brain communicates with other parts of the body (like, uhhh, THE EYES) by sending and receiving electrical signals and the rate at which those signals are transmitted CAN AND HAS BEEN MEASURED.
Clearly there is a shorted connection between the part of YOUR brain that would prevent you from arguing on subjects you don't understand and the part of your brain that would allow you to control your bowel movements, so that you don't have a poop in public.
@123IOWNALL321 If a monitor refreshes at 60 Hz, that means it refreshes the available video data 60 times per second (I'll try to keeps this as simple as possible because I know how easily you get confused). It has nothing to do with framerate. If you have a framerate of 30/sec on a 60 Hz monitor, the monitors's frequency doesn't alter increase the framerate above 30. It only refreshes (redraws) the screen twice for every frame. But the framerate is still the same.
Obviously, but the framerate can't exceed the frequency of your monitor. And please direct me to a science journal that backs up your claims that the eye "sees" at 60 hz.
@123IOWNALL321 Please direct me to the post where I stated the eyes see at a particular frequency. Perhaps if you spent more time on reading, and less on arguing what you don't understand, simple comprehension would not be such a vexing task.
BTW, maybe you would like to link to the article, in an esteemed neurological journal, that proves the brain works in "a fluid and organic process" which defies observation and measurement.
Well let's see: "our brains are wired for 60 Hz", right out of one of your comments here.
Our brains are very complicated organs, but they're not computers. They don't see in any framerate. Simply because two things are similar does not make them comparable.
@123IOWNALL321 Do you actually bother to read anything before you decide to argue about it? God knows you've proven simple comprehension is well beyond your meager intellect. Yes, i said our brains are 'wired' for 60Hz -because it is a proven fact- but you asked me to prove that our eyes see at 60 Hz, which is not something I said. Can you see where the error is entirely due to your lack of reading and comprehension skills.
Call me when you pass the grade 2 entrance exam, OK?
If a circuit is wired for 9 volts, some components don't just use 10 volts or 8 volts. It was pure inference (which I did learn in 2nd grade) that you were saying the eyes "see" at 60 hz. If you want me to prove my point beyond "organic and fluid", how about the fact that the anatomy of the eye doesn't involve any electrical impulses at all? It's simply a constant intake and reflection of light. I don't know about our brains, but our eyes definitely don't "see" at any framerate.
@123IOWNALL321 If a cct is wired for 9 volts??? WTF are you talking about? That the potential supplied is 9V or that the component(s) are absorbing a 9V load? And what does that have to do with a discussion of what the eyes "see" and what the brain perceives? Try understanding what you are saying before you say it and then you'll be less inclined to pass-off your wrong assumptions as something meaningful. The fact that my simple statement has so confused you INFERS you lack basic comprehension.
@123IOWNALL321 "It was pure inference (which I did learn in 2nd grade) that you were saying the eyes "see" at 60 hz." Inference is what the receiver (you) takes OUT of the message from the sender (me). Implication is what the sender puts IN the message for the receiver.
However, since I made no statement as to how fast the eyes see, your inference was based on an incorrect assumption of what I had implied.
@123IOWNALL321"If you want me to prove my point beyond "organic and fluid", how about the fact that the anatomy of the eye doesn't involve any electrical impulses at all?" ... how about th FACT that even the eyes of a blind man rx and tx electrical "impulses" to and from the brain? Or how about the fact that you have just proven that you are not even remotely aware of "The anatomy of the eye"?
I'd have to INFER that your brain doesn't produce many electrical impulses though.
Like I said, I'm NOT talking about the brain here. The brain may interpret the eye's reflection of light using impulses, but the primary function of the eye is to take in light and reflect it. The eye itself does NOT "see" in any amount of frames; I think you may be confused about what's being argued here. The brain may INTERPRET at "60 hz" or whatever your ridiculous claim is, but the eye certainly doesn't "see" at 60 hz.
I also don't like using that 100frames site as an example.
But runs DOOM hell on earth at 2fps
madgamer099 1 month ago
this graphics card is only ranked 22 in the world!! lol
MANG0MAN1214 2 months ago
yeah looks great but.... wil it run minecraft that is the question
dieselrock11 2 months ago
how do you get a tesla card to work with a geforce? i dont want to have to sink the money into a quadro card, and a friend of mine gave me a tesla card for cheap.
kidcrash0 2 months ago
ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!1111111111111
k3v1n971 3 months ago
NOOOOPE... chuck tesla
MrCliteatswood 4 months ago
too bad its $1999
BLiNdsnipin 5 months ago
the nividia tesla isnt a graphics card you idiots its a prossescor you have to have a seperate graghics card all the nivida tesla does is make your computer as fast as super computers medical reserachers use and people who are looking for oil but the nivida tesla can be used for gaming
300ceres 5 months ago
@300ceres Technically, the Tesla can be used for gaming. You'll just need something to output the display. Basically with the Tesla, you'll just be running your games in CPU rendering mode. Normally, CPU rendering of any modern game would be super slow, maybe half a frame per second even for the most powerful Core i7 CPU's. But with Tesla, it'd be a walk in the park.
Generalkidd 1 month ago
use you 8 or 1 of this cards
solargamer1 5 months ago
tesla is out of peopel price range and geforce is better for gameing there is more rendering effects it can do
BassPounderX 6 months ago
this graphic card just owned crysis
odair96 6 months ago
Can it run Minecraft without lags?
situsrc 7 months ago
@situsrc your joking right?
jakefleury1 6 months ago
u figured with having money for a tesla card u could buy a better camera or recording software.
Ineedagoodscreenname 7 months ago
This is editing mode, stupid, everything is frozen, try playing the game and we'll see some real fps.
quangluu96 7 months ago
Can it run Minecraft?
Nightmare1066 7 months ago 3
i gotta say, this guy is a 0superDICK0 dont know how to play the game, dont know how to film the game, SUPERDICK, YOUR FIRED!! go spend 2 grand on a brain implant NOT ANOTHER FUCKIN TESLA CARD YOU WASTED MY VALUABLE VIDEO WATCHING TIME LEARN HOW TO PLAY, LEARN HOW TO BENCHMARK ARGG OMG THAT VIDEO WAS PAIN!!!! BITCH!
iTman20007 7 months ago
@Izzzzaaaacko Actually you can use tesla to render crysis, however, i doubt it will be playable unless you recode it yourself...
mstdesigns 7 months ago
@Izzzzaaaacko Im sorry to say it, but your friend is an idiot.
xDImGellinDx 8 months ago
MOTHER OF GOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
luisoliv1000 9 months ago
what is the name of the song ? pls send me a response :D
Vkep4eto 9 months ago
@Vkep4eto The name of the song is "Mosane" from es posthumus
0supermaster0 9 months ago
How comes it crashed when I tried to play tetris?
JoeA320Pilot 9 months ago
How do you get games to run off Teslas?!
Please respond :)
DelinquentRodent 9 months ago
piece of..
Mac4280 9 months ago
but wil it blend?
patie132 10 months ago
Are you using opengl or what ever it's called? Because teslas aren't used for display
60charizard 10 months ago
The most expensive tesla card costs 8000 bucks hahaha and yes you can buy a system online that has one in it.
legitfreek 10 months ago
Tetris still runs at 20fps though
JoshJamesification 10 months ago 40
The tesla is a workstation processor with no vid output , how did u get it to display the game?
ttolmbrftttwtbopat 10 months ago
@ttolmbrftttwtbopat the tesla parallel processor doesnt work like that its strictly made for adding huge processing power to the computers 3d applications i still dont get how he got it to run with crysis thru his other video card but its possible to do i just dont have the money to mess with one of these
PsiloCybinDreamX 10 months ago
@PsiloCybinDreamX The newest Tesla cards have a video out. Look for the Tesla C2050 on amazon. It will but you out $2,400 but will provide more computational power than four GTX 580s. But honestly, what they were designed for was extreme parallel processing, not gaming.
linuxrobotdude 9 months ago
@ttolmbrftttwtbopat Some teslas have video outs. The C2070 has one DVI.
choda42 9 months ago
1:25 whats it called and how do i do that scroll thing on windows 7
paperball14 10 months ago
@paperball14 It's called Flip 3D. Press Tab and windows at the same time.
0supermaster0 10 months ago
@0supermaster0 windows + tab
nanoprehistoric 2 months ago
This dude's balls must be the size of the moon... Just sayin
StumpyTheMagicMuffin 10 months ago
you can afford this thing, and you can't afford a dam camera?
YINGAI1995 1 year ago 43
@YINGAI1995 He has the brains to put this together but not download a screen capturer?
MrAlexjenkinson 6 months ago
With this card u can walkthrough even tetris :D:D
kazha25 1 year ago
Is this Dx10 or 11?
Determinatory 1 year ago
If your kernel is limited by single precision, integer, or memory bandwidth performance, you will find the Tesla to be slower than a GTX 480 or 580. If you are limited by double precision performance, then Tesla will be faster.You should not buy Tesla for raw computational performance (except double precision), but rather because you want the other features: Better QA testing for 24/7 use, more memory, ECC, bidirectional DMA transfers over the PCI-Express bus and so on and so on.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@efendulov Absolutely correct! If you look at my videos, youll find my "High End Computer" there with 3x C1060 (will be replaced with the new C2070 next week) and a GTX 480. Alot of people compare the cards with graphic cards which is absolutely wrong. if you use / develope CUDA Software, a graphic card cant compare to a Tesla. Sure you get a good performance on CUDA with a graphic card too, but if you want perfection and the best performance you get, there is no way around Tesla Cards.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@kevintegelen Battery life would be around 1 Sekond. ;)
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
Guys, Crysis use the Tesla Cards only in Developer Mode, not in the actual game. But what wonders me is that you "only" get 150-300 FPS. I get with 3 Tesla´s and 1 GTX 480 around 1200 FPS. See the actual Hardware Setup in my video.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@efendulov Actually he is in Germany. He just edits videos. He is not even playing the game. Any game's FPS will skyrocket while you are just sitting there doing nothing. We don't even really know if he even is really using Tesla cards. He just placed a picture of one of nVidia's custom builds in the video. In addition, the c1060 are cards that plug into a desktop case just like a regular video card. Why is he showing us a rack?
trentcreek 1 year ago
@trentcreek Tesla Cards are not even designed for gaming. If you look at my videos, youll find my setup which I have at home for work with 3 Tesla C1060. Its just funny that almost everybody thinks that there designed for gaming. ;) Crysis 2 will support tesla Cards both within Developer Mode and the actual game. And with all settings maxed out you´ll get around 700 FPS with my setup. ^^ But anyway, there not designed for gaming.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
Comment removed
trentcreek 1 year ago
@trentcreek I send you the video via private message. he didnt accept my video answer.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@kevintegelen Quallcom just announced the new generation of snapdragons processors. Featuring 4 cores at 2,5 Ghz. Think about this...
0supermaster0 1 year ago
tesla is so fail. just get a few 570s with double precision, and you're done.
theres nothing but myth surrounding this.
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick Not really correct. The C2070 which I ordered couple of days ago are more powerfull then a GTX 580. You just need to go away from comparing a Tesla Card with a graphic card. For example, the ECC RAM on a Tesla card is much more efficient then the RAM on a regular card. And the differences are huge.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@TheWhistlerCode idiot. just like the talk about 64 vs 32, you idiots always read the wrong things. in CRUNCHING, RAM MATTERS LITTLE. for awhile, tesla crads didn't even have double precision, and b eating out my card doesn't suddenly mean you got the rest of my setup beat. EVER. i mean yeah its nice, but its cheaper and more wattage effective to go lower than tesla, sorry. its a good card but no one wants it. any of the teslas.
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick Tesla card support double precision, dont talk shit if you dont even have a clue. ;) i work with CUDA software I wrote myself and I use double precision. It worked with the C1060 and the C2070 so where the hell you take your "dangerouse" knowledge? Take a look at the specsheets of the Tesla Cards.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@TheWhistlerCode i'll say again, idiot, RAM MATTERS LITTLE IN CRUNCHING. and if you're buying all that hardware for seti... like you said...? i feel for your existance.
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick You seem to be the idiot, because I never saied with one single word that I bought all that stuff for SETI. And why you keep on riding on the RAM matter? Do yourself a favor and start learn reading and understand the differences. A shame that a 28 year old have to tell that a 33 old. Jesus, if I´m that stupid in 5 years, I would kill myself. -.-
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@TheWhistlerCode then please, kill yourself. also, t hats exactly what you said in your video on your page, moron. also, you're one ugly motherfucker. so please, go ahead and kill yourself. i wont mind at all. also, i'm n ot 33, thats my friend, we use the same account...a nd i think thats the FIRST time i have mentioned that in my entire time on youtube; that this is a multiple person account, any at least 4 people who have been working on gpgpus for years are laughing at your setup...lol
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick STUPID IDIOT! I said "righ now it runs BOINT" I didnt said with one word that its bought exclusively for SETI. He cantr read and cant listen.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@williamkendrick one more thing, loser.... whats your designation,do you work for intel, amd/ati (well not anymore anyway..), cray, or anyone significant? didn't think so. you're just another loser on the internet that read a few forum posts, and think that that qualifies you for something... just how long h ave you been working with server architecture, moron? cuz thats what you have. its not a high end pc dumbass, it's a server, and to call it anything else, just shows your 'experience'
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick First its not a serverm its a woirkstation. And when it comes to my job, you shouldnt care about it. And about my knowledge of serverarchitecture, I´ll bet you a million dollar, that my knowledge its far beond yours. I´f youre in germany, come over to cologne and I´ll proof it.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@TheWhistlerCode you dont get it do you?
you haven't ever been trolled before.
i dont give one rats ass where you work. your knowledge isn't even remotely on the same level as me. i'm not gonna talk about this anymore. just because my son trolled you doesn't mean you know more than *I* DO.
back off.
i'm now blocking you from further contacting us. i already explained to your stupid ass that this is a multiple user account; no one cares about your opinion. btw, thats not a workstation idiot
williamkendrick 1 year ago
@williamkendrick Maybe you should stop playing MMORPGS so much. You never explained in one post that this is a multiple user account but yea, keep on playing MMORPGS. Jesus....
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@TheWhistlerCode who the fuck said anything about mmorpgs? what the fuck are you ON? YEAH i TOLD YOU I DIDNT EXPLAIN IT WAS A MULTIPLE DUMBASS. why did i even bother to respond? keep making shitty 'workstations', noob. lolol.
williamkendrick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@williamkendrick Well if you forget what you post on the net, its nit my problem. Take a look at your profile. And about my shitty workstation: "Auf dieses Video antworten... Verbleibende Zeichen
Abbrechen oder Posten
oder Videoantwort erstellen * funny! finally a blogger that has a RIDICULOUS SETUP! god i only WISH i had four gpgpu's! i have a nice setup for a pc, but not compared to you man! williamkendrick vor 1 Tag "
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@williamkendrick You are a smelly douche
JoshJamesification 10 months ago
Can it play tetris?
mastafalco2 1 year ago
playing this video made my pc slowdown
hikmaet 1 year ago
10000000000000000000000000000 fps in super mario bros.
hikmaet 1 year ago
Now you get 120 fps with just 2 old radeon 5970s .... for like 80 times less value than this machine.. its insane how fast things improve!!!! like a gtx 480 for just 270 euros ... XD.. and thats allready 1.35 Gflops 1 card!!!! for 270 euros
Arnoud1987000 1 year ago
play the game, just dont look at the map
louie000007 1 year ago
anyone doses know the name of the song? thanks, great vid, great graphics proccesing
sebanofear 1 year ago
@sebanofear The name of the song is "Mosane" from es posthumus
0supermaster0 1 year ago
He can spend several thousand on a Tesla cards, but not $29.99 for FRAPS screen recorder?
trentcreek 1 year ago
250x times the performance of a normal computer.. also 250x more expensive..
I have i7-950/ N460gtx SLI/ 12 GB GeIL memory 1333mhz and it's already mindblowing enough and costs around 800/900 euros...
stepxunit 1 year ago
make a new video recording from the pc with fraps and make a big disaster XD
changestyleman 1 year ago
This is nice and all but why the fuck does it have 3GB of mem and a 580 only have 1.5GB? they are the same size. I want a 3GB gfx card damn. Or like I said else where. Take advantage of sli. Make one card nothing more then just 2 gpu's no mem, and another card just memory. The mem card could hold like an easy 12GB. Or even if you wanted, have a normal card sli'd up to a memory card. Stuff like that.
Netkiller3714 1 year ago
@Netkiller3714 Why 3Gb if you can get a 4 GB King of performance ATI Radeon HD Ares graphic card.
L3G3nD0001 1 year ago
@L3G3nD0001 Each card has 3GB
trentcreek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
faerydhhlo 1 year ago
man how about some game play footage
duffmanw 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
does anyone know the name of the song is being played on the video? it's pretty awesome :D
matroxtub3 1 year ago
does anyone know the name of the song is being played on the video? it's pretty awesome :D
matroxtub3 1 year ago
Retard is your stupid father, that married your stupid mother, that had a stupid child, you. We don't have to be mean, just say what you think to know , ok?! I don't need to be insultated by jerks like you. THIS tesla. is worse than the ATI HD 5970, just do the benchmarks. I did, you moron!
TheAmarildo666 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666
ATI HD5970 only got 80 FPS on crysis,moron.
You're comparing a supercomputer component to a graphics card.
Waiting for your retort.
hateWinVista 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666 =( u sad because ATI's performance still isnt enough
NeophyteOneable 1 year ago
Lol i hope this sint your personal computer...?
eilif9 1 year ago
This video sucks, NONE spec could do 300fps in Crysis, not even 4x 5970OC, and a i7. This frame rate you got it's cuz your pc is not processing anithing. I've done the SAME THING with a GF 6800 and I got 70~ frames in high. This sucks, man! you people are getting fooled by this jerk
TheAmarildo666 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666 you know 8 c1060s is equivlelnt to 16 5970's
Bioh4zardGaming 1 year ago
@Bioh4zardGaming buuull! Tesla C1060 # of Streaming Processor Cores 240 (Hd5970= 3200) Tesla C1060 Memory Bandwidth 102 GB/sec (Hd 5970= 256 GB/s) ; # of Tesla GPUs 1 (hd5970 = 2 ) ;tesla C1060 Memory Speed 800MHz (HD5970 = 1000Mhz GDDR5 agains GDDR3 of tesla), so, don't try to say this tesla is twice better than 5970, you dont get a shit about GPU's
TheAmarildo666 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666 um excuse me i have owned 5970s and the memory bandwith is not 256gb/s its 128 look it up on tweak town and no its not 3200 real cores some do light texturing and some do med and high so its not really 3200 also these cards do a teraflo a peice so eight of them would bve 8 teraflops vs 2 5970s doing 4 please before you start trolling youtube look at some benchmarks of supercomputing numbers and better yet look at some gdc 2010 videos that my whack your ass into shape
Bioh4zardGaming 1 year ago
@Bioh4zardGaming oh yeah, it is 3200, 1600 per core. the only thing I was wrong was about the bandwith is not 256gb/s its 128 really. buut, 5970 pwn the tesla.
TheAmarildo666 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666 in gaming but not folding :P
Bioh4zardGaming 1 year ago
@TheAmarildo666 So does the gtx 580, the tesla isn't made for gaming.
TheRealSpartanW80 1 year ago
@TheRealSpartanW80 That's right! FINALLY some gets that tesla ins't 4 gaming.
TheAmarildo666 1 year ago 2
@TheAmarildo666 u retard! the Tesla is a GPGPU, which can process basically anything that a CPU does, the ATI only does calculation to accelerate the CPU performance even with OpenCL it won't replace the Tesla anytime soon.
ykliu1995 1 year ago
@ykliu1995 Ok, a PC's CPU and any GPU out there are completely different architectures. So you're comparing apples and oranges.
Also any specific code a Tesla could run any other GeForce 8000/ Radieon HD2000 series or newer GPU could run, albeit slower being not specifically tooled for mass computation. All OpenCL is doing is opening up GPGPU functions to be easier to program for and to allow any ARM-9 GPU to use them.
Dant2142 1 year ago
BORING ;) Its not possible to use a Tesla for ingame calculations. ;) This is only Developer Mode which actually supports Tesla. ;)
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
SanRamon6768 1 year ago
Can i get the Archivement OVER 9000 ? with it?
Xextreem 1 year ago
this is what I call using a NUKE for gaming !!
I wish I had that monster !
erionmema1 1 year ago
if you use a system with 1 Nvidia tesla c/m2070, 1 quadro 6000 and 2 Geforce GTX 480 together in quad sli and a i7 processor you can max crysis out with 200-400Fps
Emieltes1 1 year ago
@Emieltes1 Quad Sli givews you a lower framerate than tripple sli btw ;) ive testet it
0supermaster0 1 year ago 22
@0supermaster0 Not really correct, I´ve tested it out with my old configiuration (look at my videos) and I had around 1800 FPS. never tested it out with the new Fermi Tesla´s but I will give it a try this weekend.
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 Maybe Tesla is so but GTX 480 in Quad SLI is beter than GTX 480 in Tripple SLI...Maybe youre CPU is to slow?
TheEsseboy 1 year ago
@TheEsseboy only 2-10% for 500$/€ it's useless
Emieltes1 1 year ago
@Emieltes1 its more like 15-33% ;) And yes its useless...I am happy with my GTX 470 :P
TheEsseboy 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 Then why would anyone ever do quad SLI? Your tests don't seem to make sense there.
GeekingForJesus 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 Only if you have a motherboard that puts your x16's to x8 when 4 are in use.
tres9027 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 i know, it's only like 2-10% faster than tri-sli and sometime it can take too much power from your suply so that the orther cards don't get enough and thats when you lose performance with quad-sli(4way not 2xdualcore)
Emieltes1 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 Depends on the motherboard. Intel SLi chips are worthless.
Mavrik347 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 Depends on the motherboard. Intel SLi chips are worthless.
Mavrik347 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 not correct, when you use a mainboard with 4 PCIe Slots that supports the full lanes. ;)
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@0supermaster0 did you set up your sli profile? no, dumbass
oskArtist 9 months ago
@Emieltes1 wtf are you talking about? quad sli is only with 4 of the same GPU's, you cant mix and match them, so just 4 gtx 480's or w/e.
Rrichthe3 1 year ago
@Emieltes1 What in the fuck would you need that kind of power for? Rofl.
malicios 1 year ago
@Emieltes1 How so? SLI only works with the same model of GPUs.
JimmaWetcha 1 year ago
mw2 would get a million fps
ehab007bob 1 year ago 35
@ehab007bob
Thats because a Geforce 2 could max it out. (exaggeration)
ksidornseif 1 year ago
@ehab007bob the GPU would turn off because its not needed xP
Metalbirne 1 year ago
@ehab007bob
the problem during recording is that you need a Tbyte for only the space.
skynord1995 1 year ago
@ehab007bob MW2 will never get millions of frames, because they dont even support tesla in Devmode. ^^
TheWhistlerCode 1 year ago
@ehab007bob Unreal Tournament would get a N/A fps
HairyDONG69 11 months ago
HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!1
MrFrederiktorp 1 year ago
Comment removed
jamalakj 1 year ago
@rawrEvan Now take your eyes of of the red dot and concentrate on one of the far extents (left OR right) of the bar's range, while changing the frame rate. Then concentrate on the opposite extent. Notice how the actual range didn't change? Thus our erroneous perception (while focusing on the dot) occurs because meaningful data is being omitted(ignored).
Thanks for supporting my original statement and disproving arguments to the contrary!
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan I viewed your latest link, and played with all the settings. All of which helped to prove that our brains receive information at a fixed rate and that once that rate is exceeded our brains ignore more and more of the incoming information.
To wit: focus on the red dot while increasing the frame rate. Notice how the range (left to right) of the bar decreases. Same thing happens as you drive faster and faster. Your eyes still see the periphery but your brain ignores that information.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
The whole point is the fluidity of the motion. The blank spaces in which the bar isn't seen is due to the limitiations of the monitor not refreshing enough. Most monitors only refresh 60 times per second (60HZ). The monitor is not a perfect display in order to judge what the brain comprehends in regards to how many frames are comprehend, but this is irrelevant. The perceived fluidity of the motion is hte point.
TheAnonymouz 1 year ago
@rawrEvan ok, lemme see if i actually understand you,... you argue against a statement i made by posting a link to a website which contains nothing but rambling incomprehensible gibberish and then once you are confronted by the absurdity of your tactic you attempt to save face by admitting you "don't like" that website. Did you bother to view the site or understand the nonsense therein, before you used that site as the foundation for your argument and before you implied someone else was a moron?
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
So basically what I'm saying and what I've been trying to say is frames aren't comparable to the way the human eye receives information. You can't really draw any consistent conclusions. There have been tests showing more sensitivity towards changes in light than in changes in colours and even moreso with certain colours.
But as far as gaming is concerned, 60 fps is just fine.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
Comment removed
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan "There's a difference, if you can't see it, you probably aren't very good at games."
You make an imbecilic statement like that after calling me a moron? I'm assuming you don't have any mirrors where you live.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rawrEvan "Haven't you ever looked at 120hz/240hz screens at a store?" You do know that 120 Hz monitors/tv's receive data at 60 Hz, don't you? It displays at 120 Hz by examining two successive 1 Hz periods and "inferring" what data would be displayed during a 1 Hz "fake" period between the two actual periods. Haven't found anyone who likes the effect, but I haven't seen it myself.
There's a difference, if you can't see it, you probably aren't very good at games.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan "We also see blending of "frames" as a result, for example, quickly move your cursor around on the screen. You can see it appear to be in many places at once as you mentally blend "frames" together."
If the cursor appeared at many places at once, there would be no perception of motion but rather many replications of the same object instantaneously. The eyes do not see that as motion nor does the brain attempt to "blend" that as a perception of motion.
YOU FAIL!
ZWILD1 1 year ago
Comment removed
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan Here's a gem from the website you linked to:
"Maybe the industry didn't add enough security factor to CDs and that's why many people still feel that analog is sometimes better. It's like in a room full of neon lights. You just know that something isn't right."
How many bottles of Jack do you have to down before your brain starts to spew this kind of shit?
And what kind of MORON holds this up, not for it's own sake but, to back his equally incoherent argument?
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan O.K. let me see if I've got this straight. You belatedy enter an argument, refuting a statement by posting a link to a website. Said website proposes an endless stream of arguments, none of which relate to each other, to explain something the author clearly doesn't understand (or have much interest in) and ends up summarizing, contradicting the previously made arguments, with incoherent babble that is so random a crack addict would laugh at it's stupidty.
And you call me a moron?
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@rawrEvan
Ahh I see now, you must've accidentally replied to my post instead of ZWILD1's...
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@rawrEvan
Yeah I guess we can agree on that... xD
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@rawrEvan
I don't know what you're accusing me of. Of course there's a difference, I never said anything contrary to that. In fact I even agreed with you that the eyes don't see in "frames", so who's the moron here?
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
the game is stodmotion wave no move is still , better run crisis benkmark :D, sorry bad english
xfollador 1 year ago
soon these comps will run u 2000 in 2015. playing counter strike: bravo.
poopchunk3 1 year ago
TESLA FTW
necronlord40k 1 year ago
Nvidia Tesla is not designed to play games on or to use it as a gaming pc at home.
But somebody who actually have more money than brain, will never get it.
FBIAustria 1 year ago
@FBIAustria What I am seeing here is Crysis running with a better and more stable framerate than I have ever previously seen on a standard gaming PC.
Compability issues are likely the problem, I don't honestly know why no one has yet made a true gaming supercomputer, considering I think there is a huge market for it.
UnknownXV 1 year ago
Nice you wasted a lot money. You know the human eye can see up to MAX 60 FPS right?
TheWeirdMusic 1 year ago
@TheWeirdMusic 61.997 actualy
metalmanga 1 year ago
@TheWeirdMusic No, human eye sees upto 2500 FPS
epizowningyou 1 year ago
@epizowningyou Yeah sure okay....
TheWeirdMusic 1 year ago
@epizowningyou humans can on average process 24fps
monstercameron 1 year ago
@monstercameron LOOOOOOOOOL .then you're fucking stoned.
epizowningyou 1 year ago
@monstercameron I use my eyes. I can see a truly massive difference between 24 fps and 60. After 60 I dont notice much.
UnknownXV 1 year ago
@epizowningyou well duh lol but very strangely i see a HUGE diff between 100FPS and 1000FPS man wow lol cool huh?
realflow100 1 year ago
@epizowningyou Irrespective of what the human eye can see, which will vary from one individual to the next, our brains are wired for 60 Hz. Framerates above 60 will be harder and harder to detect once you've exceeded the brain's ability to process the incoming information. Even if the eye could detect movement at 2500 fps, it would be an absurd redundancy as the brain would ignore 97% of the information the eyes were receiving.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1 How abou the new 3D monitors that use 120Hz , AND 3D movies that are projected at 120hz ?
epizowningyou 1 year ago
@epizowningyou You are comparing apples to oranges. A monitor's refresh rate is not the same as the frame rate of a motion picture. If you achieve 30 fps in a game while using an 120 Hz monitor, it just means each frame is drawn 4 times before the next frame is displayed.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
Our brains are not "wired" for 60 hz because we don't process information in herz, or frames. It's a fluid, organic process. Maybe the reason you don't notice framerates over 60 fps is because you've only seen it on a 60 hz monitor.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 Actually our brain communicates with other parts of the body (like, uhhh, THE EYES) by sending and receiving electrical signals and the rate at which those signals are transmitted CAN AND HAS BEEN MEASURED.
Clearly there is a shorted connection between the part of YOUR brain that would prevent you from arguing on subjects you don't understand and the part of your brain that would allow you to control your bowel movements, so that you don't have a poop in public.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 If a monitor refreshes at 60 Hz, that means it refreshes the available video data 60 times per second (I'll try to keeps this as simple as possible because I know how easily you get confused). It has nothing to do with framerate. If you have a framerate of 30/sec on a 60 Hz monitor, the monitors's frequency doesn't alter increase the framerate above 30. It only refreshes (redraws) the screen twice for every frame. But the framerate is still the same.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
Obviously, but the framerate can't exceed the frequency of your monitor. And please direct me to a science journal that backs up your claims that the eye "sees" at 60 hz.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 Please direct me to the post where I stated the eyes see at a particular frequency. Perhaps if you spent more time on reading, and less on arguing what you don't understand, simple comprehension would not be such a vexing task.
BTW, maybe you would like to link to the article, in an esteemed neurological journal, that proves the brain works in "a fluid and organic process" which defies observation and measurement.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
Well let's see: "our brains are wired for 60 Hz", right out of one of your comments here.
Our brains are very complicated organs, but they're not computers. They don't see in any framerate. Simply because two things are similar does not make them comparable.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 Do you actually bother to read anything before you decide to argue about it? God knows you've proven simple comprehension is well beyond your meager intellect. Yes, i said our brains are 'wired' for 60Hz -because it is a proven fact- but you asked me to prove that our eyes see at 60 Hz, which is not something I said. Can you see where the error is entirely due to your lack of reading and comprehension skills.
Call me when you pass the grade 2 entrance exam, OK?
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
If a circuit is wired for 9 volts, some components don't just use 10 volts or 8 volts. It was pure inference (which I did learn in 2nd grade) that you were saying the eyes "see" at 60 hz. If you want me to prove my point beyond "organic and fluid", how about the fact that the anatomy of the eye doesn't involve any electrical impulses at all? It's simply a constant intake and reflection of light. I don't know about our brains, but our eyes definitely don't "see" at any framerate.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 If a cct is wired for 9 volts??? WTF are you talking about? That the potential supplied is 9V or that the component(s) are absorbing a 9V load? And what does that have to do with a discussion of what the eyes "see" and what the brain perceives? Try understanding what you are saying before you say it and then you'll be less inclined to pass-off your wrong assumptions as something meaningful. The fact that my simple statement has so confused you INFERS you lack basic comprehension.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321 "It was pure inference (which I did learn in 2nd grade) that you were saying the eyes "see" at 60 hz." Inference is what the receiver (you) takes OUT of the message from the sender (me). Implication is what the sender puts IN the message for the receiver.
However, since I made no statement as to how fast the eyes see, your inference was based on an incorrect assumption of what I had implied.
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@123IOWNALL321"If you want me to prove my point beyond "organic and fluid", how about the fact that the anatomy of the eye doesn't involve any electrical impulses at all?" ... how about th FACT that even the eyes of a blind man rx and tx electrical "impulses" to and from the brain? Or how about the fact that you have just proven that you are not even remotely aware of "The anatomy of the eye"?
I'd have to INFER that your brain doesn't produce many electrical impulses though.
FLATLINER!
ZWILD1 1 year ago
@ZWILD1
Like I said, I'm NOT talking about the brain here. The brain may interpret the eye's reflection of light using impulses, but the primary function of the eye is to take in light and reflect it. The eye itself does NOT "see" in any amount of frames; I think you may be confused about what's being argued here. The brain may INTERPRET at "60 hz" or whatever your ridiculous claim is, but the eye certainly doesn't "see" at 60 hz.
I also don't like using that 100frames site as an example.
123IOWNALL321 1 year ago