FULL VERSION: Ted Bundy, Interview by Dr. James Dobson in 1989 Before Execution

[jenny13579]

@jamdowner listen if you are on the Internet to be arguing back and forth that long, you watch porn. I know it. It's ok, everything in moderation....... Except religion ;)

[polskie90]

As far as Ted not wanting to talk about the murder of the little girl... i chalk that up to one thing. He had very little time left. He didn't want to exhaust anymore of his energy on trying to seem sympathetic. Although as a natural psychopath this man felt no sympathy or empathy naturally. Most psychopaths won't admit that about themselves but he did. That was kind of peculiar about Ted. As evil as he was... he was intelligent enough to see through his own antisocial personality disorder.

[dwhills1]

Can't take anything he said as truth, Bundy was a very manipulative man and a good liar

[BennyBoyt4484]

WOW!!!... he's a really good actor!!

[MrTedBundy89]

Bundy told James Dobson what he wanted to hear he had no remorse for anything not even the 12 year old girl he killed!! He was a master at deception!!

[thefallennikaya]

lol great liar.

[voncloft]

I'm happy he got the death penalty...I really am

[douglasdeane23]

Bundy was a pawn for Dobson's misplaced obsession and agenda to rid the Universe of porn -- even though Dobson probably "studied" more porn than Bundy had ever watched. Keep it up, Dobson, you're doing a bang-up job.

[jamdowner]

@douglasdeane23 Bro, you are so deceived. I have first hand seen the damage porn has done to people and to families.

[douglasdeane23]

@jamdowner I'm the one deceived? Really... Well, I've seen first-hand the damage religion has done to people and to families, too. Does that make religion evil because it disables people's ability to see beyond their own "first hand" shadow in that people make over-simplified generalizations based on personal experience?

[jamdowner]

@douglasdeane23 I think your analogy is incorrect. I think religion is like fire. Fire when used properly can be used to warm oneself and to cook. When fire is out of control like a forest fire or a house fire it is completely destructive. Porn is like ingesting rat poison or better yet it is like crack cocaine. It is completely evil and there is nothing redeemable about it.

[douglasdeane23]

@jamdowner Porn is the same thing. It can be used as a healthy outlet for a rudimentary fundamental human need -- unless when you have sex with your significant other it's strictly for reproductive purposes. There's no difference between being "aroused" by your significant other when or if you "role play" or whatever and being "aroused" by a healthy dose of porn for an outlet for a very basic human need. Depends on how you use it, young grasshopper.

[jamdowner]

@douglasdeane23 I agree sex is a basic human need but it doesn't justify natural needs being fulfilled in unnatural ways. Just because I have a need for sex doesn't mean I go out raping a woman. That is fulfilling a natural need in an unnatural way. And before you say that porn isn't a crime, it doesn't stop it from being unnatural. Using your hand to "jack" off, is unnatural. If that were true, God would have made the hand into female genitalia. Dude, I'd hate to shake your hand.

[douglasdeane23]

@jamdowner Again, the harmful effects of religion hard at work... For one, who said anything about raping a woman? All porn materials are rapes? For two, who said anything about me watching porn. Just because I can see it for what it is, unlike yourself, means I use it? Lovely judgment. For three, "jacking" off is very natural. Four, "God" didn't "make" anything, which I won't even get into, just again proves my point of how religion destroys intelligence.

[jamdowner]

@douglasdeane23 Sigh! I didn't say you raped anyone. I said rape CAN be fulfilling a natural need for sex in an unnatural way. It was an analogy. I clearly explained that. But then you are intelligent. Your superior intelligence has clearly enlightened you on the necessity of porn. Poor me! I guess I'll just have to stick to women.

[douglasdeane23]

@jamdowner I never said you said I raped anyone... lol... This is out of control. But if you're visually stimulated by an attractive nude woman, raping a woman and a harmlessly alone teenager flubbing his dolphin to a playboy between sessions of playing Warcraft are the same thing, you are correct. How silly of me.

[jamdowner]

@douglasdeane23 I bow to your superior intellect.

[destroyfaith94]

I wish he would have just been completely honest. I really want to know how he thought.

[MrTedBundy89]

@destroyfaith94 lol he didnt fell a thing he hade no empathy for any of his victims

[hemisemidemiquaver64]

@10:19 Ted's face is classic! “Shut. That. F***ing phone off! I’M speaking. ME!” He looked like he broke his facade for a split second. Hahaha! I wish I could have met him...

[dqAllure]

Who was the serial killer, ted bundy or the interviewer ? LOL joking!

[jasper1754]

Kinda reminds us of George!

[lenarita1]

25:28 says A LOT. he's checking to see if dobson is buying his act. 28:18 is a real glib reaction. basically, tho' he's right that there are many people like him out there. he's a psychopath. estimates are 1-5% of the general population are considered so and there are 7billion plus people in the world. recommend dr. robert hare's book: "without conscience". as dr hare has said, if you are intelligent, attractive and psychopathic, you can do a lot of damage.

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 Ah, you are so good you are able to read minds. Amazing.

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner no, babe, i'm reading his face.

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 I had a friend who had a toothache. He told me he shook hands with a colleague and at the same time his toothache erupted in excruciating agony resulting in a pained look on his face. For weeks that colleague went around telling people that my friend didn't like him. Moral: You can read someone's face incorrectly. And many times we do.

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner sorry about your friend. too bad his colleague was so poor at reading faces. i am not the colleague. i feel secure in my reading of his facial cues.  in addition, the man bundy was indeed a sadistic psychosexual serial torturer murderer. it's not going too far to say that he may have also been a manipulator and a liar.

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 From reading reports of Bundy, yes, I gather he was a manipulator and liar in the way he managed to lure unsuspecting women but as to reading faces...many times people in general can't even read their own motives so how are they able to read another person's face? It's like the old Charlie Brown cartoon strip. Lucy to Linus: "I just think I have a knack for seeing other people's faults." Linus to Lucy: "What about your own faults?" Lucy to Linus: "I have a knack for overlooking them."

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner let's see if i can explain this to you in a way that you will understand. there are 7 billion plus people in the world. there just may be a sizable portion of the population that have abilities that you yourself do not possess. i can't speak to willful ignorance which of course may be your actual position. you just may not be able to see, intuit or interpret subtle and nuanced facial expressions on par with others in the world. you think you know but you do not see.

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner part II. here are some things you may consider. you certainly don't need to take my word for it, please do your own research although i believe you do not want to learn but merely try to prove yourself right with convoluted arguments. i do not know your gender but it is generally known that women have a greater ability to detect nuanced facial expressions than men, just as women generally have a keener sense of smell than men. not all men, not all women but in general.

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner part III there are varying degrees of ability to perceive and interpret facial and social cues based on neurological status, such as people with asperger's or stroke victims. there are schools of thought that say that a person's thought processes such as whether they are thinking and speaking of something in the past or in the future can be determined by the listener by the speakers eye position (visual accessing cues). in poker it is called a "tell" as in tell tale sign.

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner part IV you may just be naive or immature or perhaps somehow have impaired emotional ability to read facial expressions. perhaps you yourself are psychopathic and have a shallow emotional life. you should, at least, recognize the fallacy in your belief that because you do not see it, then others are also not able to see it or it does not exist. think: color blindness. judging by the comments on this video and your responses, the deficit clearly seems to lay in you.

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 Part 1. Sigh! Let me explain this in a way YOU can understand. Many many many misunderstandings and contentions have happened because someone has claimed to have "read" someone's face. I've seen this happen many times. I have talked to people like this and they will swear blind that they "know" the "truth". I've tried to say, "Listen! He/she isn't like that." And the reply is "I know what I know". How can you convince such people? It's amazing to me how many people have this "gift". 

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 Part 2. As to being naive. Here's a man who's been tried & convicted of being a murderer. It's easy to say "Aha!" when the deed is already done. I remember the case of Dr Harold Shipman. After he was convicted someone brought out a video of an interview of him years before where he was asked questions and he was constantly blinking. They said that this was because he was a pathological liar. It'd have been great to know the good doctor was a liar BEFORE he murdered anyone than AFTER.

[jamdowner]

@jamdowner Part 3. Here was a man who outwitted the law and his many victims for YEARS. Yet YOU picked up his duplicity. Wow! And you picked it up when? Before he got caught? And you call me naive. Please! If I am psychopathic and emotionally shallow you are indeed a fantasist and deluded. Good night!

[lenarita1]

@jamdowner you must be a very lonely, lonely person. 

[jamdowner]

@lenarita1 Wow! You picked that up from reading my comments? You are amazing!

[lenarita1]

he had already had the thoughts and the porn "crystallized" or rather hardened his own thought processes. it was already there in his head before the porn. see his reaction at 6:10. he was a serial sexual torturer psychopathic murderer. he was probably thrilled to have his thought processes reinforced and "validated" by porn. he really starts the bullshit train at 12:50. he can barely keep from smiling the whole time as he remembers the 1st murder and his feigned "remorse". he's conning.

[Dakdizzy]

what was his last meal?

[vangoghlicious]

he's gorgeous, super intelligent (IQ of 140!), and extremely well spoken. i'm engaged by him and i can tell the interviewer is too. it's a shame he didn't put those qualities to better use. it's hard to say if his remorse is genuine, but i still disagree with the death penalty.

[grogann]

It is sad how easily I could fucking stomp this weak cunts head until it caved in

[mearsn]

Telling Dobson what he wants to hear because he was a big Christian anti-porn advocate. Bundy changed who he was like a chameleon. I don't buy a word of it. Fascinating interview, though.

[spike2008ful]

he is a complete liar.his grandparents raised him and his so called sister was his real mother.and i doubt porn is what got him to kill all those innocent girls.he is just sorry it is his turn to die.he is a coward.

[lever20065]

this guy is very intelligent! its scary how intellegent he was.

[PeterRoeder31]

Best interview of all time.