I have also seen multiple times this month, and the previous bright white lights near provo canyon. The lights disappear and appear again. They move side to side and hover not to high up in the air. I would say lower than the mountains. Multiple friends and family have spotted flying triangular crafts all over Utah county as well as Las vegas, and Logan Utah (right above the Logan LDS temple).
I just saw something completely different from this video hovering over highland/american fork oct.9 2011.. a formation in the shape of a triangle, spinning.
@elbowface24 I believe you because I have seen that same thing atleast 3 times. As well as several friends witness similar description. I have see UFOs flying near provo canyon. Bright whitish lights moving side to side and disapearing and reapearing.
@the13thdream still the chances of it hitting it even if there is something in the middle is second to none the wind speeds and the atmosphere would play a major role in shooting it, and even if it was a space craft what would one bullet do to it? And the bullet would be weaker from the wind and speed from traveling that far up
I live in Kalamazoo, Michigan and the other night was driving home around 8pm and saw one single hovering red light "looked like stationary burning red road flare" in the air about 350 ft off of the ground. I thought it was antennae tower, but got closer and saw there was no tower. I have vision that is better than 20/13 in both eyes and saw this constantly for 3 minutes while driving.
That shit was cool as fuck. I dont know what it was, but it was definitly very strange. These recent UFO seem to be dropping things down to the ground. I believe they are getting ready for something. Perhaps a mass communication event.
Curious to see what you have in store, for the next "Lights in the Sky" event. That way, all of the other UFO watchers in your area will know what to look out for, and can disreguard your ascending aparatus, as nothing special to report. Don't need to waste valuable field investigator's time, trying to verify your Earthly IFOs. You should probably video yourself launching the next one as well. Just to satisfy the others, who are commenting that you couldn't possibly be the origin of these lights
Then, just watch how these new and "really cool" alien movies, actually blow away the ticket sales records, in the coming weeks and months. O.K., that said and done. Mr. Smith you aksed what happened to KISS. I was trying to explain the kiss principal, that we used in the stunt industry. Keep It Simple Stupid was our motto, to keep things as safe as possible. Curious to know if you figured out the flash bulb idea, and plan to use LEDs in the future? Not enabling you or encouraging you, just...
There is no doubt, that Mr. Smith and his high flying Artisitc Creation is not a stunt, that was designed for any major publicity sponsor. The Jerusalem UFO videos are clearly FAKE, and I will gladly post the evidence from my in depth analysis and investigation, on which ever website you believers so choose. I believe the Jerusalem UFO hoax was designed to draw interest to the UFO phenomena, and help the new movies about alien invasions, make record millions at box office sales! Don't believe me
Mr. Smith... I see that you are still drawing much attention from your Art Project. Sorry for not responding to your last set of questions. Had a family emergency. Now, first of all...to the people who claim the Jerusalem UFO is not fake. I can eat that event to shreds, with 2,000 plus words of documented analysis, I sent to all of my fellow UFO researchers. I can prove every single Jerusalem video as fake, beyond a shadow of doubt! That event was (is) simply a Propaganda Stunt. Unlike this...
@yankeegal01. Again. A total dodge of the 1-26 sighting that totally validates my story which just so happens to be the facts. The truth is out there, you just need to accept it once you find it. f
@ASMITHSCULP So these flares are popping up everywhere? even during the day? right. Have you ever seen a flare? or been under one for that matter? Im a Untied States Marine and i still have not seen flares that stay a constant redish orange they flicker in and out and have huge smoke trails and fall rather fast. and better yet most of the time they are green or white. and do not descend out of the sky like that.im a skeptic to but give me a better explanation then flares because these are not.
The video sightings over Utah and Jerusalem are very different from these videos. Helium with flares will simply continue to rise. the video in Jerusalem and as well as other sightings did not behave as these balloons do. The video of the other objects moves rapidly sideways as well as quickly upward and downward. Helium simply drifts upward until spent then descends, as these videos attest to. Helium will not descend rapidly the ascend rapidly as the other videos show
Dude, sweet hoax. I followed this story for a month, completely stumped. Kudos! You should have kept people guessing though... obviously ignorance is bliss for some people.
I am inclined to follow the advice of a stupid saying my grandpa had hung in his garage "it's not wise to argue with a fool, listeners can't tell the difference"
@yankeegal01 Have you not looked at the 1-26 footage that clearly shows two flares and a third lighting up in a triangle formation not to mention the smoke that can very easily be seen?
@yankeegal01 Okay, here is what I don't get. How come there seems to be some selective hearing going on here. How many times do I need to point out the video I shot, of the 1-26 sighting. So I just happen, by luck, to be in prime viewing spots of both major sightings in Utah, HD camera in hand? I don't think so. People are so convinced as to what they think they are seeing that common sense and logic go right out the window.
@ASMITHSCULP So you took this video of a "thang" you manufacturered on your own, and then you videotape it..... with you whispering "unlock the door", and then questioning one another saying "what the hell is that?"...... oooookkkkkkkkkkkkkaaaaaaaaaaaaay. And you could take a video of it in the sky, but not of it taking off? Okaaaayyyyy........Only a fool would believe that story.....
@yankeegal01 My brother in law helped me launch the 2-14 "UFO". The "What the hell is that?" would be him. After all the hoopla of the 1-26 launch I told him to just be quiet cause I wasn't sure how I was going to use the footage. Post it as an actual UFO or to debunk the 1-26 launch. Needless to to say, he role played a little bit.
And not filming it taking off would be stupidity on my part. Good grief I wish I had done that, now I need to do another launch sometime and get it right.
@yankeegal01 Oh, glad to see your still ignoring the 1-26 footage as well. Good to see your still ignoring some details, while focusing on others. Wouldn't you be a real treat in a jury box.
@ASMITHSCULP Mr. Smith... don't you get it.. I don't care about what you say. I've seen all the videos of the UT sighting along with all the other videos shot across the US on the same night. What part of "I don't care" do you not understand. Your story and the facts don't add up... so you keep ranting and ignore the other facts. I'm done here..... only fools would believe this story.
@yankeegal01 It doesn't add up to what you want and that is why you can't see this is clearly a simple rig. If your argument is simply "I don't care" than please do give up. It's clear that you are not going to listen to anything that doesnt' support your conspiracy theory, desire for alien encounters, or whatever else it is that you so desparately want this to be. You are the one ranting while Mr. Smith has provided more and more details you have added nothing. Good luck getting probed!
So Mr. Smith, you are saying you are responsible for the sighting that was in Utah on 02/14? So how do you explain the exact same thing seen in Riverside CA on 02/14 and in Illinois on 02/14? Explain that...... still don't believe it was him in this video.
@yankeegal01 Riverside footage is strangly similar. Illinois is quite different..more like Chinese Lanterns. I can't explain either and won't try but it doesn't change the facts of this incident which occured exactly as described by Mr. Smith and is not related in any way. You are confusing coincedence for causality which is a natural instinct but doesn't mean it's right. If it's not him than what is it?
@yankeegal01 I am saying I am responsible for the sighting in Utah on 2-14, and 1-26. Also responsible for two other sightings one on 2-9 and one mid January that weren't heavily reported. Nothing to do with any other sightings.
@ASMITHSCULP Then using logic lets look at this. If on the same night, the same thing was seen in three different states, & you state you are responsible for one of them, then either one of two things are true: 1. You know more than you say and a group of people planned this. Care to elaborate on the "Nothing to do with any other sightings" in the other two states (CA and IL)? or 2 You had nothing to do with the "craft" seen in UT. Using Occam's Razor, the latter is the more logical one.
@yankeegal01 Your options are based on an assumption that the events are related, even the same. There is no evidence showing that this is a single, common, or even coordinated event. There happens to be similar video from the same night but there are stark differences between each one. I can understand the temptation to consider a connection but there is no evidence to make "logical" arguments as if their connection is a fact.
@yankeegal01 You are working under the assumption that similar reports of similar events mean that they are definitely connnected. Again, you are confusing coincidence with connection/causality. If three car crashes happen in three different cities at the exact same time by the similar cause does it mean that they are connected? Would the police look for one drunk driver? Please give up using scant youtube evidence from grainy clips in scattered places to argue for "logic". You shame Ockham.
@SlimBizzy82 n still some dumb idiots believed in it when it came out originally. same dumb idiots believe in that Jerusalem dome of rock one which is as fake.
@chinamanspeakenlis your just a moron if you think the jerusalem ufo was faked........some people will believe anything....people spreading disinformation on that sighting are bigger idiots then the people believing them.
@SlimBizzy82 Andrew was never trying to create a fake for the UFO watching community or create a publicity stunt. He was just playing around with something visually interesting. That being said, without being an intended hoax it was good enough to make the news on two separate channels and if you take a look at the comments below there are still people arguing that it was a UFO even after he came forward. Too funny! If you read the posts and watch carefully you can see what it is.
@dnmhn i was one of the people that thought this was a sighting......thats just because i believe first and ask questions later, and im sure im not the only one.....i also like a good sighting proved false.....aliens are not the only thing in the sky, but they take up a good part of it. :)
@dnmhn Again, there you go, defending your friend from an account that was made a few days after this video was posted, when questions were raised. I never said it was "ET", but I did say this was not done by Mr. Smith. As for UFO, remember, that means "unidentified flying object"... not necessarliy meaning "ET". And if Mr. Smith did do this event, then he is in violation of FAA regulations due to the altitutde of the "thang".
@yankeegal01 Try the new flickr link in the description above. LMK if it still does not work. Also, last time I checked the FAA's restriction on balloons and etc. is a payload of 4lbs or less. I was well within that.
@yankeegal01 Are you not done yet? Look, you are so demanding of proof why don't you prove that Mr. Smith didn't do it. As for now this is pretty clearly an IFO yet you refuse to accept the evidence that is increasingly clear even to an "objective observer" that this is a simple light show. Why so angry, especially if you don't even care if it's ET or not? Lighten up! I did create the account specifically to comment on the entertaining show that this spectacle has become.
@hotstunts For the time being I am just sitting on it I have other projects that need my attention. I still have more footage of both the 1-26 and 2-14 launches. Unfortunately nothing of the prep and launch. The 1-26 clip I put up is the closest. Any more footage wouldn't change anyones mind. I'll get it up soon though.
I look forward to seeing an announced and possibly televised show of your sky artwork. Where you could arrange for your devices to be launched, from a public park or small airport runway. Old style flash bulbs, wired into a tiny timer, that allows a transister battery to power the flash, would probably add an awesome effect to your devices! As long as you are willing to go public and be safe, I could help with some suggestions. Flash bulbs are very safe.
@hotstunts What happened to KISS. What is so great about this to me is how simple it was pulled off. It also reduces the number of variable that could make things different and potentially cause problems. That being said, the flashes would look cool. LED lights would also be easy to lift into the sky.
10 to 15k feet! I am really amazed that you can still see your devices, at that height. To be honest, I would love to see a diagram or photo, of your apparatus. From your descriptions, you actually appear to be taking many precautions, with your design. I have a license to construct small demolition devices, for hollywood special effects and wild west shows. I am also a retired stuntman, so you can understand why I have serious concerns about safety. I always use the KISS principal.
@hotstunts it seems amazing at first but I'm sure you see the lights of airplanes flying at night. Passenger planes generally cruise at 32,000 to 40,000 feet.
@hotstunts. First of all, hats off for being an Airbourne Ranger, more guts than I'll ever have. Second, I never said it was completely safe. I know there was some risk, but I felt like they were minimal enough that it was still worth doing. Anything like this is a risk, Chinese lanterns, model rockets, etc. Etc. If I was trying to deceive witnesses, I wouldn't have come out and said it was me.
Why don't you simply set a date and invite the media, and any one else who is excited about your new artisitc creation? Make your atmospheric artwork available to the public for display, and demonstrations. Reveal your devices openly, at a certified show and allow the police and fire department, to actually determine how safe your home built devices are. What's a matter? Not up to the challenge? Create an annual Fake UFO event in your community, and become famous. Be Safe!
@ hotstunts. If you want me to estimate the actual height, I would say roughly 10 to 15 k feet. That's plenty high for safety but well below cruising speed of any airliner, last time I checked I could see those just fine.
@hotstunts. I am not an idiot and am aware that sending a live source of ignition up in the air can be dangerous, if it is done carelessly. I took a lot precautions and frankly and body who sends up a Chinese lantern is creating a much larger fire hazard than I ever created.
I have been a UFO researcher and investigator for many years now. I was also an Airborne Ranger and quite informed about flares. I have seen them burn trees and fields, on very rare occasions. I just can't wrap my brain around, why you are so insistent, that your UFO Art projects are completely safe and that you somehow enjoy deceiving witnesses. When the real UFOs show up, everyone will simply say "Oh that's just our local Artist again". Talk about crying Wolf!
Your "Secret" UFO devices, are not flying much higher than Chinese Lanterns. Unless they are actually as large as a small plane or a mass of 20+ helium balloons. Because, they are still quite visible to witnesses on the ground, and they are not using any optical enhancers to see your UFOs. You know what a "Zot" is? A string of deflated balloons, or even trash bags that are set ablaze, and they will continue to release FLAMING drops of rubber or plastic, for a long time!
Mr. Smith, you have clearly stated that you have no idea where your devices are landing. Fireworks bottle rockets, etc. land fairly close to where it was launched, and you could easily spot an erutping fire, to take appropriate action. You say that your apparatus is sent HIGH up into the atmosphere, and everything burns out before it is even halfway to the ground. Sorry, but you would not be able to see your very small fake UFOs well enough to video tape them, if they were that high up.
@objectiveobserver4. Perhaps you have yet to look at my video of the 1-26-11 launch. This clearly showes the third flare lighting up and the flashers illuminating the smoke. The flares alone barely make the smoke visible
@ObjectiveObserver4 By the way you still have not commented on the 1-26-11 video of mine which very clearly shows the smoke and ignition of a third flare from the 1-26 sighting in Utah.
I don't care if all of you are using flares, rocket fuses, or fireworks. You are Irresponsibly sending live pyrotechnic devices high up into the atmosphere. Not the same as launcing a fireworks rocket into the air. Your devices have plastic trash bags, or balloons and other flammable material within the apparatus. You have no idea where these devices are landing. These actions are extremely hazardous and could turn into a Felony Conviction, if they ignite structures or fields! Grow up please! RD
That's right HIGH up into the atmosphere. Everything burns out before it is even halfway to the ground. Not the same as launching rockets, those fall from only a few hundred feet onto neighbors houses and fields. On the fourth of July no less, TINDERBOX!! There is a reason this was done in the middle of winter, despite all the precautions taken before that. Anyone who launches a bottle rocket, or mortar (illegal or not) is posing a much higher risk than this ever was.
"bloom flowers" and fireworks were attached to the balloons huh? never mentioned that before. what was holding them? and what mechanism "released them"? what lit them? how did you control the timing? because obviously their lighting would have to coincide with their release. this is starting to get pretty sophisticated...
@ObjectiveObserver4 (by the way you don't seem too objective on this issue when I look at your other posts/video) Ever heard of Occam's razor? This seems like a good time for its application, especially when you seem so doubtful of points that are actually quite reasonable (many fuses won't go out even under water and are routinely used with fireworks to connect and provide delays...just tape the fireworks along the fuse and they light up as the fuse reaches them.
@ObjectiveObserver4 Nope. Just somebody that knows that truth and finds it absolutely hilarious that people are still chasing this goose. I did tell ASMITHSCULP to not provide the details on the device (as simple as it is) to avoid a certain amount of liability and prevent copycats that could lead back to him. I also jokingly said at the time that some people would still likely insist it was an alien or secret government craft.
That's right I never mentioned that before. And if you read the description again I specifically mention that some details had been left out. Perhaps, this is one of them. And as far as timing, their release, and what was holding them. All done by simply taping the the fuse of the flower or flasher to the flare itself. As the flare gets shorter, it hits the fuse, the fuse ignites, no longer holding the flasher in place, and lighting it at the same time. TA DA!!!
- rocket fuses? are you kidding? it takes a while for balloons to reach an altitude of several thousand feet. those must have been some really long model rocket fuses. and it's a miracle they stayed lit durng the entire ascent considering how cold and windy it is up there.
Actually, around four to six feet or so of fuse, green fuse (water resistant) burns at 24 seconds per foot red fuse (water proof) burns at 30 seconds a foot. I've used both. Ever used rocket fuse? I am pretty sure water resistant and water proof also means cold and wind resistant, and and cold and wind proof.
Oh and did you notice how quickly that that balloon from the fun fair turned into a tiny little dot in the sky? Only a couple minutes.
- at 03:10 the 3 lights in the middle are making a nice triangle. then the top light in the triangle drops a white orb which falls and "bumps" into the light in the bottom right of the triangle. that light then MOVES UP between the other two lights in the triangle so that it is now a straight line! so how does that happen?
- and one more thing...where did it land? if it was that visible thousands of feet up, it must have been really big. so where did it land?
at 3:10 is actually quite interesting. keep in mind each flare is on its own at its own rate of ascent, altitude and distance from the viewer (me, although you don't believe that). Absolutely no depth perception, like looking at the flat blanket of stars in the night sky. Therefore the formation is bound to appear to change quite drastically at times when it appears they are all on the same plane. The bigger dipper doesn't look like the big dipper viewed from Pluto.
@ASMITHSCULP so it was loose rope! and yet they did hold a formation. you see, it's more than "connecting the dots". depth perception only accounts for back and forth movement. a triangle can be made from any three dots, but not a RIGHT triangle(remember your geometry?). and at the beginning of the video, they are holding a perfect right triangle. then after a minute they do move a little, but only to then make a pefect EQUILATERAL triangle at 02:00! that is beyond unlikely....
@ObjectiveObserver4 You totally missed my point on this earlier, and still don't get it. Based on this logic that must really be a giant spoon in the night time sky. From my perspective looking at the launch from the south as it drifted north, then east, three of the lights look like a triangle. But your right, depth perception is forward and backward. SO someone looking at those same three lights from the west will still see a triangle by connecting the dots, it just looks different.
@ASMITHSCULP you missed my point. a RIGHT TRIANGLE can't be formed by independantly floating balloons. let me explain:
you got 1 dot in the center and 2 dots somewhere around it. there are 360 degrees of space around the center dot where the other dots could be. regardless of depth, a right triangle could only be formed if the two outside dots are in EXACTLY the right place at the same time. the probability of this happening with independantly floating balloons is zero....
@ObjectiveObserver4 I am inclined to think that the possibility of an artist releasing flares hung from bags of helium is a much higher probability, than intelligent life traveling to Lehi Utah and purposely forming a series of triangles that can only be seen from a certain point on the ground, and it just so happens that I manage to be lucky enough to be at exact location, with my HD camera!!
@ObjectiveObserver4 Just uploaded the only two pictures I have of the the 1-26-11 "UFO" before launch. I wasn't concerned about documenting this cause I wasn't planning on it turning into a huge issue. And I actually thought that common sense and logic would prevail and people could see it for what it actually was.
The stars in the big dipper are not all the same distance from us. Some are much further away and some are closer. But from our viewing angle here on earth they align to form "the big dipper". Hop in a UFO (i prefer triangle ones) and fly several million light years in one direction, and the big dipper no longer looks like the big dipper, as that distance and perspective change from a new vantage point. Any three dots make a triangle when you connect the dots.
So you are also pointing out the moment it is a Right triangle (yes I remember geometry, I hated it and sucked at it) and an equilateral triangle. But simply ignoring the jibberish in between. You see what you want to see, in this case a UFO. Personally I go with flares and helium for the description, rather than ET or the Government dropping to the lower atmosphere to give us all a really cool light show and geometry lesson.
@ASMITHSCULP ...and it wasn't just in that position breifly as they were randomly floating around. they held a right triangle formation for well over a minute. a clear sign of intelligent control. and if that wasn't enough, then they move into an EQUILATERAL triangle, which is even more unlikely than a right triangle! this is clear evidence of intelligent control.
@ObjectiveObserver4 I am getting the strong impression that you are definitely not an expert on "evidence of intelligent control." You are seeing what you want to see! You sound like the Bush administration selling evidence of WMD's. If you are convinced and so badly want to see an alien or other mysterious space craft you are going to bend your perspective and abuse the evidence to that end.
@ObjectiveObserver4 Try this, take three pushpins, put them in the wall making a perfect right triangle. Step back a few feet, mentally “connect the dots” looks great, now step to the left five feet, “connect the dots” again, not quite the right triangle it was anymore. Move anywhere in the room and you will get a different triangle from the same three points. Perhaps even an equilateral one. And this is all being done on a single flat plain, eliminating the HUGE factor of distance.
@ObjectiveObserver4 When you say they hold their formation PERFECTLY in a right triangle, not true. If you look closely you can see that they never stay in perfect formation. They are constantly moving. Just very slowly, reason for this. They were drifting away from me, and already at least a mile away, if not more. Objects at a distance tend to appear to not move as fast as they really are. A jetliner flying some 300- 400 miles an hour appears to slowly and gracefully move across the sky.
-at 1:50 what is being dropped are more ground bloom flowers and "lightning flasher" fireworks, the ones that strobe really bright, also sometimes called "signal flares" (a bit ironic).
- the flares were not connected, other than the top two lights which were tangled. The wire only goes from the bags down to the flare. Although when launched they are tethered by a single fuse. Then they separate. The formation is nothing but the mind playing "connect the dots".
- two of the witnesses in the news broadcast were ex-military. they are very familiar with flares(one of them manufactured flares as his job) and said these were definately not flares.
- flares produce a stream of light and sparks. these are perfectly spherical orbs.
- at 00:11 you can see another orb appear, fall then dissapear. at 00:21 the light at the top splits into two. that's 6 lights. you said you only used 5 flares...
-First guy in ABC 4 interview "What was being DROPPED were not flares" womens husband, "What was being seen was not a military exercise" nothing to do with flares other than he used to make them. That's right, it wasn't a military exercise, and what was being dropped was not flares.
- If I am not mistaken, any source of light from a distance looks like and "orb", street lights, flashlights, campfires, oh and flares. (note the obvious smoke in my 1-26-11 "UFO" video)
-at 00:11 the "Orb" falling is actually a ground bloom flower firework as it fell away from the flare above it then burnt out.
-at 00:21 it is not a single light in the first place. That's called a camera zoom, you know, when you zoom in on something that looks like a single light but it is actually two. (although at that moment, the "flower" mentioned before can still be seen falling. Almost looking like another flare, it is still the same flower falling from before)
One more thing, the two lights or "Orbs" as you like to call them, in the top left corner are actually two bundles of three flares. Should have each been three individual lights. But they obviously got tangled and did not separate, so they made the trip in a bundle. Hence the reason they are brighter lights as well.
Tell ya what.. I'll believe it was ASmithSculp when I see a video of him making his "UFO", launching is "UFO", and his "UFO" flying. Every video that ASmithSculp referencs was not taken by him. And I'd like for him to explain how his "UFO" was seen in California on the same night. Not that I don't believe him, I'd just like to know since he's in "full disclosure" mode.
@yankeegal01 Do you believe him or not..."I'll believe it...when I see a video..." vs "not that I don't believe him." I think the main reason he is not providing details is that it is so damn simple that if others knew exactly what he did there would be an "alien invasion" every night. You don't believe him and won't believe him. Opinions on creationism, global warming, etc...all show that evidence doesn't always outweigh conviction. You are convinced this is a ufo no matter what he shows.
@dnmhn You hit the nail on the head. It was so easy, yeah, a little curiosity is fun I'll admit, but bottom line. I don't think it is a good idea to have every 14 year old across the country doing the same thing.
@yankeegal01 Your right, every video was not taken by me, that's what makes it so cool is that so many people saw it. So why is it that I am the only one who has HD video of BOTH events, including the very beginning of the 1-26-11 launch.
Everyone says, "how come your UFO was seen in CA, or IL, and etc." Well it wasn't, that was something totally different. For all I know they are actual UFO's, that would be awesome. But in all likelihood it is either someone else like me, or something else.
@yankeegal01 okay, he has said he used flares, garbage bags, and helium. Not incredibly specific but it adds up nicely. His own HD video is posted of both events, including the ignition of the first one (I think) that shows that he knew it was going to light up before it lit up and shows smoke. It is also funny to watch eye witness accounts that describe in awe that it looked like flares and fireworks.....maybe because it was flares and fireworks? If he shows you I'm sure you will just copy
@dnmhn No, he specifically said none of the videos were his. Still, there is no proof in the pudding and at this time, he's doing nothing but gleaming for his 5 minutes of fame... and that's over.
@yankeegal01 Please read carefully! He says none of the videos in Chicago, California, etc....are his. He has posted his own video of both Utah events that he filmed personally and then posted. Others captured video of the same event that caused the initial news stories and he claims no responsibility or knowledge of the events outside of Utah County. If you are pissed off about his 5 minutes of fame stop posting on the video.
@dnmhn Dude... what part of him saying "Your right, every video was not taken by me,....." including this one. Christ, I swear people can not read anymore......
@yankeegal01 I'll concede he didn't describe it too clearly but technically all this sentence is saying is that there are multiple videos of the "event" on youtube and "every video was not taken by me" means that he is not claiming responsibility for every video but he is not saying that he is not responsible for some of the videos. We can argue semantics in this case but he follows by clearly claiming that he has his own HD video of both events (posted here and linked in his description)
@dnmhn Again, what part of "Your right, every video was not taken by me.." do you not understand to mean he made any of the videos? There is no reason to argue semantics in this case, his words are clear. Again, if he truly is responsible for this, a simple picture of the "contraption" is simple. I for one, do not believe he is responsible for this event in Utah, as this "UFO" was seen in several states hundreds of miles apart, on the same night. Do I believe it's ET? No.
@yankeegal01 you are stuck on one vaguely worded phrase that can be interpreted differently and now you can't see the forest for the trees. Look at the new stories, his other videos, and the details he does provide. Unless you come back with something particularly outlandish I'll leave it at this as we have already strayed into what you "believe" so any logical argument isn't going anywhere anyway. Why is your burden of proof for other claims so low? You hear and see what you want to believe
@dnmhn I don't believe it was him unless he has actual video or pictures. You however, are constantly defending him without any proof. There is no burden of proof he submits that this "thing" in the air is his, hence he has no claim.
@yankeegal01 No use continuing the argument with you as your mind is already made up. I suspect he could show you pictures and provide details and you would still be skeptical. Now I just wish I could join you in a game of poker; you seem reckless with the odds (helium filled bags lifted flares vs. alien spaceship....I'll bet on the flares every time) and your sense of the bluff is pretty warped.
@dnmhn Never knew a court case to be won simply by someone saying "I didn't do it!". Evidence is what gives the burden of proof. Smith has not presented one bit of evidence to support his claim. And obviously you must have a hard time reading... I did say that I did not believe it to be "ET". Personally, I believe YOU to be Smith using a different name, since your account was just created on 02/19/2011. Bottom line is that Mr. "Smith" has no evidence supporting his claim. Hes a fake.
@yankeegal01 Please read carefully! He says none of the videos in Chicago, California, etc....are his. He has posted his own video of both Utah events that he filmed personally and then posted. Others captured video of the same event that caused the initial news stories and he claims no responsibility or knowledge of the events outside of Utah County. If you are pissed off about his 5 minutes of fame stop posting on the video.
@mrstheus1 NO....you caught something that seems eerily similar in your opinion. Based on your logic a person convicted of crime in one place must automatically be guilty of the same crime in another city 3 days later or even worse could claim that he isn't guilty because he didn't do both. All ASMITHSCULP is saying is that he created these few events. He claims nothing more and is open to the possibility that other events might hold more meaning.
@dnmhn .......what im saying is.......regardless to whatever it is you are sayin, I have seen some strange shit in the atmosphere around here....... ya hear??? and Im out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@mrstheus1 I can't argue about what you think you saw or didn't see...sounds creepy. I was only insisting that you not make a call on many things you haven't seen, especially when the extent of the explanation for what you have seen with your own eyes is "strange shit." ASMITHSCULP is giving information on isolated events in a specific location and not making claims or inferences on anything else.
Sorry kids, no aliens here today. So many kids think disclosure is going to arrive on youtube. LOL. When the aliens arrive it will be on the news. Youtube is for "UFO" videos of satellites, Venus, airplanes, bugs, birds, bats, kites, hang-gliders, Chinese lanterns, R/C planes with LED lights, etc. ... and now whatever this creation is from an interesting artist.
This is hilarious. There are already web comments linking to this video, and saying "Oh this is amazing...the debunkers will have such a hard time with this video." Nicely done, dude.
@REALUFOCLIPS I think he was just having some fun and you need to chill out. I can understand being angry but your incessant and childish posts don't do your cause any good at all. I bet you are the person alluded to in the new description that has been calling and making harassing phone calls. If you don't want him to get attention stop giving him so much of it!
@REALUFOCLIPS what failed? it seems like he was just trying to play around and have some fun? If he was trying to make it a hoax he could have said nothing and there would still be many people insisting it was real....in fact you and others still seem to insist that very thing.
@ASMITHSCULP Hi Andrew, I guessed a while back that if you were to get this effect you would use balloons as oppose to lanterns and attach flares to achieve the phosphorescent brightness . Guessing you must have illuminated the balloons with red LEDs is that so? This goes to show that you need more than just video footage on its own as evidence of real ariel phenomenon. Cheers
Mr. Smith, I'm a dedicated UFO researcher and I wasn't fooled by your artistic exhibition. Why did you pull such a stunt again, after you said in the news interview, that you did not want this to spiral out of control? You realize that magnesium flares are not a simple class 2 fire hazard. They are classified as a class 7 "Explosive", and you were dropping these to the ground and onto your neighbor's houses? You should be investigated by the authorities. Stop the Art Project! DR
I saw this that night as it was happening amazing looks like one giant craft to me, the lights were bright red and there were white lights coming out of it to the ground.
@REALUFOCLIPS your obsession undermines your credibility! I think you need to chill out a little bit....it seems like you wanted this to be real so badly, in fact you believed it was real and now you are pissed because this guy is telling you it is a simple party trick.
Those who believe in the UFO phenomenon don't appreciate red herrings. You knew these object were indeed identified when you posted this video with "UFO" in the title.
I have also seen multiple times this month, and the previous bright white lights near provo canyon. The lights disappear and appear again. They move side to side and hover not to high up in the air. I would say lower than the mountains. Multiple friends and family have spotted flying triangular crafts all over Utah county as well as Las vegas, and Logan Utah (right above the Logan LDS temple).
Origin305 4 months ago
I just saw something completely different from this video hovering over highland/american fork oct.9 2011.. a formation in the shape of a triangle, spinning.
elbowface24 4 months ago
@elbowface24 I believe you because I have seen that same thing atleast 3 times. As well as several friends witness similar description. I have see UFOs flying near provo canyon. Bright whitish lights moving side to side and disapearing and reapearing.
Origin305 4 months ago
Probably for about a year,actually!
eyeriz87 5 months ago
You can see this light also in Lindon,Spanish Fork,its still there,has been for a while now!!!!its bluish,redish
eyeriz87 5 months ago
This man is lying. He is participating in a cover up. Sound far fetched? Watch this video:
"Joe Scarborough: UFO Cover Up in Arizona"
And watch the ones posted below.
ObjectiveObserver4 6 months ago
These UFOs are appearing all over the world:
“UFOs in France Jan 14, 2011”
“UFO Orb Triangle in Ireland”
“UFO in Jerusalem Jan 28, 2011”
“UFO Orb Triangle Russia Jan 16, 2010”
“Massive UFO Formation Filmed by Police, Slovakia April 28, 2009”
“UFOs Over Rome, Itlay June 6 2010”
“UFOs in Peru 2009”
“UFOs Guadalajara Mexico 2004”
“UFOs Filmed by Mexican Air Force”
ObjectiveObserver4 6 months ago
“UFO Triangle El Paso, Texas Oct 15, 2010”
“UFO Triangle Arizona Nov 20, 2010”
“UFOs in San Diego Jan 1, 2008”
“UFO Triangle New Jersey Jan 5, 2009”
“UFO Orb Triangle El Cajon, CA Feb 24, 2009”
“UFO Triangle in Minnesota August 10, 2010”
“Real UFO in Utah Feb 14, 2011”
“UFO Triangle Riverside, CA Feb 14, 2011”
“UFO Triangle Colorado March 20, 2011”
ObjectiveObserver4 6 months ago
BASTARD!!!! I WANT ALIENS!!!! WAY TO FOOL THE MASSES!!!!
djlegionhardtek 8 months ago
8 aliens in the ufos dislike this video :)
AliGms87 8 months ago
@the13thdream Really? Wow.... what a hill billy question.. "Theres something we don't know..... let's shoot at it."
TinFury 9 months ago
could this be satellites?
kiakilai 10 months ago
@the13thdream still the chances of it hitting it even if there is something in the middle is second to none the wind speeds and the atmosphere would play a major role in shooting it, and even if it was a space craft what would one bullet do to it? And the bullet would be weaker from the wind and speed from traveling that far up
LugiFan1000 11 months ago
@the13thdream It would take a lot of rounds to try and shoot one tiny dot in the sky you would have better luck trying to shoot at a fly
LugiFan1000 11 months ago
I live in Kalamazoo, Michigan and the other night was driving home around 8pm and saw one single hovering red light "looked like stationary burning red road flare" in the air about 350 ft off of the ground. I thought it was antennae tower, but got closer and saw there was no tower. I have vision that is better than 20/13 in both eyes and saw this constantly for 3 minutes while driving.
tmichnic 11 months ago
Nice footage.
StrategyMaster17 11 months ago
Great job man!
nonamejanexxx 11 months ago
That shit was cool as fuck. I dont know what it was, but it was definitly very strange. These recent UFO seem to be dropping things down to the ground. I believe they are getting ready for something. Perhaps a mass communication event.
MrGhostblood 1 year ago
Curious to see what you have in store, for the next "Lights in the Sky" event. That way, all of the other UFO watchers in your area will know what to look out for, and can disreguard your ascending aparatus, as nothing special to report. Don't need to waste valuable field investigator's time, trying to verify your Earthly IFOs. You should probably video yourself launching the next one as well. Just to satisfy the others, who are commenting that you couldn't possibly be the origin of these lights
hotstunts 1 year ago
Then, just watch how these new and "really cool" alien movies, actually blow away the ticket sales records, in the coming weeks and months. O.K., that said and done. Mr. Smith you aksed what happened to KISS. I was trying to explain the kiss principal, that we used in the stunt industry. Keep It Simple Stupid was our motto, to keep things as safe as possible. Curious to know if you figured out the flash bulb idea, and plan to use LEDs in the future? Not enabling you or encouraging you, just...
hotstunts 1 year ago
There is no doubt, that Mr. Smith and his high flying Artisitc Creation is not a stunt, that was designed for any major publicity sponsor. The Jerusalem UFO videos are clearly FAKE, and I will gladly post the evidence from my in depth analysis and investigation, on which ever website you believers so choose. I believe the Jerusalem UFO hoax was designed to draw interest to the UFO phenomena, and help the new movies about alien invasions, make record millions at box office sales! Don't believe me
hotstunts 1 year ago
@hotstunts yea but watch this till the end and tell me if you still think its fake /watch?v=vEG122E5R7w
cptskellern 1 year ago
Mr. Smith... I see that you are still drawing much attention from your Art Project. Sorry for not responding to your last set of questions. Had a family emergency. Now, first of all...to the people who claim the Jerusalem UFO is not fake. I can eat that event to shreds, with 2,000 plus words of documented analysis, I sent to all of my fellow UFO researchers. I can prove every single Jerusalem video as fake, beyond a shadow of doubt! That event was (is) simply a Propaganda Stunt. Unlike this...
hotstunts 1 year ago
@yankeegal01. Again. A total dodge of the 1-26 sighting that totally validates my story which just so happens to be the facts. The truth is out there, you just need to accept it once you find it. f
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP So these flares are popping up everywhere? even during the day? right. Have you ever seen a flare? or been under one for that matter? Im a Untied States Marine and i still have not seen flares that stay a constant redish orange they flicker in and out and have huge smoke trails and fall rather fast. and better yet most of the time they are green or white. and do not descend out of the sky like that.im a skeptic to but give me a better explanation then flares because these are not.
VirkDS 10 months ago
@ASMITHSCULP
The video sightings over Utah and Jerusalem are very different from these videos. Helium with flares will simply continue to rise. the video in Jerusalem and as well as other sightings did not behave as these balloons do. The video of the other objects moves rapidly sideways as well as quickly upward and downward. Helium simply drifts upward until spent then descends, as these videos attest to. Helium will not descend rapidly the ascend rapidly as the other videos show
bobbykhawk 3 months ago
Amazing video!
MrSeriamente 1 year ago
Dude, sweet hoax. I followed this story for a month, completely stumped. Kudos! You should have kept people guessing though... obviously ignorance is bliss for some people.
chloejaye 1 year ago
I am inclined to follow the advice of a stupid saying my grandpa had hung in his garage "it's not wise to argue with a fool, listeners can't tell the difference"
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Have you not looked at the 1-26 footage that clearly shows two flares and a third lighting up in a triangle formation not to mention the smoke that can very easily be seen?
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Okay, here is what I don't get. How come there seems to be some selective hearing going on here. How many times do I need to point out the video I shot, of the 1-26 sighting. So I just happen, by luck, to be in prime viewing spots of both major sightings in Utah, HD camera in hand? I don't think so. People are so convinced as to what they think they are seeing that common sense and logic go right out the window.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP So you took this video of a "thang" you manufacturered on your own, and then you videotape it..... with you whispering "unlock the door", and then questioning one another saying "what the hell is that?"...... oooookkkkkkkkkkkkkaaaaaaaaaaaaay. And you could take a video of it in the sky, but not of it taking off? Okaaaayyyyy........Only a fool would believe that story.....
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 My brother in law helped me launch the 2-14 "UFO". The "What the hell is that?" would be him. After all the hoopla of the 1-26 launch I told him to just be quiet cause I wasn't sure how I was going to use the footage. Post it as an actual UFO or to debunk the 1-26 launch. Needless to to say, he role played a little bit.
And not filming it taking off would be stupidity on my part. Good grief I wish I had done that, now I need to do another launch sometime and get it right.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Oh, glad to see your still ignoring the 1-26 footage as well. Good to see your still ignoring some details, while focusing on others. Wouldn't you be a real treat in a jury box.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP Mr. Smith... don't you get it.. I don't care about what you say. I've seen all the videos of the UT sighting along with all the other videos shot across the US on the same night. What part of "I don't care" do you not understand. Your story and the facts don't add up... so you keep ranting and ignore the other facts. I'm done here..... only fools would believe this story.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 It doesn't add up to what you want and that is why you can't see this is clearly a simple rig. If your argument is simply "I don't care" than please do give up. It's clear that you are not going to listen to anything that doesnt' support your conspiracy theory, desire for alien encounters, or whatever else it is that you so desparately want this to be. You are the one ranting while Mr. Smith has provided more and more details you have added nothing. Good luck getting probed!
dnmhn 1 year ago
So Mr. Smith, you are saying you are responsible for the sighting that was in Utah on 02/14? So how do you explain the exact same thing seen in Riverside CA on 02/14 and in Illinois on 02/14? Explain that...... still don't believe it was him in this video.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Riverside footage is strangly similar. Illinois is quite different..more like Chinese Lanterns. I can't explain either and won't try but it doesn't change the facts of this incident which occured exactly as described by Mr. Smith and is not related in any way. You are confusing coincedence for causality which is a natural instinct but doesn't mean it's right. If it's not him than what is it?
dnmhn 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 I am saying I am responsible for the sighting in Utah on 2-14, and 1-26. Also responsible for two other sightings one on 2-9 and one mid January that weren't heavily reported. Nothing to do with any other sightings.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP Then using logic lets look at this. If on the same night, the same thing was seen in three different states, & you state you are responsible for one of them, then either one of two things are true: 1. You know more than you say and a group of people planned this. Care to elaborate on the "Nothing to do with any other sightings" in the other two states (CA and IL)? or 2 You had nothing to do with the "craft" seen in UT. Using Occam's Razor, the latter is the more logical one.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Your options are based on an assumption that the events are related, even the same. There is no evidence showing that this is a single, common, or even coordinated event. There happens to be similar video from the same night but there are stark differences between each one. I can understand the temptation to consider a connection but there is no evidence to make "logical" arguments as if their connection is a fact.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 You are working under the assumption that similar reports of similar events mean that they are definitely connnected. Again, you are confusing coincidence with connection/causality. If three car crashes happen in three different cities at the exact same time by the similar cause does it mean that they are connected? Would the police look for one drunk driver? Please give up using scant youtube evidence from grainy clips in scattered places to argue for "logic". You shame Ockham.
dnmhn 1 year ago
HA! Best fucking troll ever, dude.
Racecarlock 1 year ago
Why do people whisper to each other while watching a ufo?
ameriwatr 1 year ago
@ameriwatr Cause it is so mysterious.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
Do it again but record yourself making the setup this time.
ETSpacealien 1 year ago 2
Yes, a little too . . . .quite.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
wow, it's finally quiet in here. Nice!
dnmhn 1 year ago
i like your honesty.
chinamanspeakenlis 1 year ago
with this video you can see its an obvious fake........and a shitty fake at that
SlimBizzy82 1 year ago
@SlimBizzy82 n still some dumb idiots believed in it when it came out originally. same dumb idiots believe in that Jerusalem dome of rock one which is as fake.
chinamanspeakenlis 1 year ago
@chinamanspeakenlis your just a moron if you think the jerusalem ufo was faked........some people will believe anything....people spreading disinformation on that sighting are bigger idiots then the people believing them.
SlimBizzy82 1 year ago
@SlimBizzy82 Andrew was never trying to create a fake for the UFO watching community or create a publicity stunt. He was just playing around with something visually interesting. That being said, without being an intended hoax it was good enough to make the news on two separate channels and if you take a look at the comments below there are still people arguing that it was a UFO even after he came forward. Too funny! If you read the posts and watch carefully you can see what it is.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn i was one of the people that thought this was a sighting......thats just because i believe first and ask questions later, and im sure im not the only one.....i also like a good sighting proved false.....aliens are not the only thing in the sky, but they take up a good part of it. :)
SlimBizzy82 1 year ago
@dnmhn Again, there you go, defending your friend from an account that was made a few days after this video was posted, when questions were raised. I never said it was "ET", but I did say this was not done by Mr. Smith. As for UFO, remember, that means "unidentified flying object"... not necessarliy meaning "ET". And if Mr. Smith did do this event, then he is in violation of FAA regulations due to the altitutde of the "thang".
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Try the new flickr link in the description above. LMK if it still does not work. Also, last time I checked the FAA's restriction on balloons and etc. is a payload of 4lbs or less. I was well within that.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Are you not done yet? Look, you are so demanding of proof why don't you prove that Mr. Smith didn't do it. As for now this is pretty clearly an IFO yet you refuse to accept the evidence that is increasingly clear even to an "objective observer" that this is a simple light show. Why so angry, especially if you don't even care if it's ET or not? Lighten up! I did create the account specifically to comment on the entertaining show that this spectacle has become.
dnmhn 1 year ago
Whoa whoa whoa
Shrubbs 1 year ago
Two images are on my FLicker photostream
.flickr.com/photos/80678701@N00/
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP According to Flickr, that URL does not exist. Even when removing the @N000/..... care to try again?
yankeegal01 1 year ago
This aint no hoax, the same thing all around the world, including Jerusalem which was spectacular, I guess that was u too huh?
algernontaylor 1 year ago
As always. It comes down to time and money. Never enough of either.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
Oh I do have two still photos of the 1-26 "device" but they are pretty bad quality
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@hotstunts For the time being I am just sitting on it I have other projects that need my attention. I still have more footage of both the 1-26 and 2-14 launches. Unfortunately nothing of the prep and launch. The 1-26 clip I put up is the closest. Any more footage wouldn't change anyones mind. I'll get it up soon though.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
That would be pretty cool.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
I look forward to seeing an announced and possibly televised show of your sky artwork. Where you could arrange for your devices to be launched, from a public park or small airport runway. Old style flash bulbs, wired into a tiny timer, that allows a transister battery to power the flash, would probably add an awesome effect to your devices! As long as you are willing to go public and be safe, I could help with some suggestions. Flash bulbs are very safe.
hotstunts 1 year ago
@hotstunts What happened to KISS. What is so great about this to me is how simple it was pulled off. It also reduces the number of variable that could make things different and potentially cause problems. That being said, the flashes would look cool. LED lights would also be easy to lift into the sky.
dnmhn 1 year ago
10 to 15k feet! I am really amazed that you can still see your devices, at that height. To be honest, I would love to see a diagram or photo, of your apparatus. From your descriptions, you actually appear to be taking many precautions, with your design. I have a license to construct small demolition devices, for hollywood special effects and wild west shows. I am also a retired stuntman, so you can understand why I have serious concerns about safety. I always use the KISS principal.
hotstunts 1 year ago
@hotstunts it seems amazing at first but I'm sure you see the lights of airplanes flying at night. Passenger planes generally cruise at 32,000 to 40,000 feet.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@hotstunts. First of all, hats off for being an Airbourne Ranger, more guts than I'll ever have. Second, I never said it was completely safe. I know there was some risk, but I felt like they were minimal enough that it was still worth doing. Anything like this is a risk, Chinese lanterns, model rockets, etc. Etc. If I was trying to deceive witnesses, I wouldn't have come out and said it was me.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
Why don't you simply set a date and invite the media, and any one else who is excited about your new artisitc creation? Make your atmospheric artwork available to the public for display, and demonstrations. Reveal your devices openly, at a certified show and allow the police and fire department, to actually determine how safe your home built devices are. What's a matter? Not up to the challenge? Create an annual Fake UFO event in your community, and become famous. Be Safe!
hotstunts 1 year ago
@hotstunts Not a bad idea?
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ hotstunts. If you want me to estimate the actual height, I would say roughly 10 to 15 k feet. That's plenty high for safety but well below cruising speed of any airliner, last time I checked I could see those just fine.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@hotstunts. I am not an idiot and am aware that sending a live source of ignition up in the air can be dangerous, if it is done carelessly. I took a lot precautions and frankly and body who sends up a Chinese lantern is creating a much larger fire hazard than I ever created.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@hotstunts. Hence the reason the flares are suspended by steel wire at least 15 feet below the bags. No chance of the bags catching fire.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
I have been a UFO researcher and investigator for many years now. I was also an Airborne Ranger and quite informed about flares. I have seen them burn trees and fields, on very rare occasions. I just can't wrap my brain around, why you are so insistent, that your UFO Art projects are completely safe and that you somehow enjoy deceiving witnesses. When the real UFOs show up, everyone will simply say "Oh that's just our local Artist again". Talk about crying Wolf!
hotstunts 1 year ago
Your "Secret" UFO devices, are not flying much higher than Chinese Lanterns. Unless they are actually as large as a small plane or a mass of 20+ helium balloons. Because, they are still quite visible to witnesses on the ground, and they are not using any optical enhancers to see your UFOs. You know what a "Zot" is? A string of deflated balloons, or even trash bags that are set ablaze, and they will continue to release FLAMING drops of rubber or plastic, for a long time!
hotstunts 1 year ago
Mr. Smith, you have clearly stated that you have no idea where your devices are landing. Fireworks bottle rockets, etc. land fairly close to where it was launched, and you could easily spot an erutping fire, to take appropriate action. You say that your apparatus is sent HIGH up into the atmosphere, and everything burns out before it is even halfway to the ground. Sorry, but you would not be able to see your very small fake UFOs well enough to video tape them, if they were that high up.
hotstunts 1 year ago
@objectiveobserver4. Perhaps you have yet to look at my video of the 1-26-11 launch. This clearly showes the third flare lighting up and the flashers illuminating the smoke. The flares alone barely make the smoke visible
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@objectiveobserver4
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
it's not a question of IF you are lying. it's a question of WHY?
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 By the way you still have not commented on the 1-26-11 video of mine which very clearly shows the smoke and ignition of a third flare from the 1-26 sighting in Utah.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
I don't care if all of you are using flares, rocket fuses, or fireworks. You are Irresponsibly sending live pyrotechnic devices high up into the atmosphere. Not the same as launcing a fireworks rocket into the air. Your devices have plastic trash bags, or balloons and other flammable material within the apparatus. You have no idea where these devices are landing. These actions are extremely hazardous and could turn into a Felony Conviction, if they ignite structures or fields! Grow up please! RD
hotstunts 1 year ago
@hotstunts
That's right HIGH up into the atmosphere. Everything burns out before it is even halfway to the ground. Not the same as launching rockets, those fall from only a few hundred feet onto neighbors houses and fields. On the fourth of July no less, TINDERBOX!! There is a reason this was done in the middle of winter, despite all the precautions taken before that. Anyone who launches a bottle rocket, or mortar (illegal or not) is posing a much higher risk than this ever was.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
"bloom flowers" and fireworks were attached to the balloons huh? never mentioned that before. what was holding them? and what mechanism "released them"? what lit them? how did you control the timing? because obviously their lighting would have to coincide with their release. this is starting to get pretty sophisticated...
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 (by the way you don't seem too objective on this issue when I look at your other posts/video) Ever heard of Occam's razor? This seems like a good time for its application, especially when you seem so doubtful of points that are actually quite reasonable (many fuses won't go out even under water and are routinely used with fireworks to connect and provide delays...just tape the fireworks along the fuse and they light up as the fuse reaches them.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn i assuming this is ASMITHSCULP as well.
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 Nope. Just somebody that knows that truth and finds it absolutely hilarious that people are still chasing this goose. I did tell ASMITHSCULP to not provide the details on the device (as simple as it is) to avoid a certain amount of liability and prevent copycats that could lead back to him. I also jokingly said at the time that some people would still likely insist it was an alien or secret government craft.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
That's right I never mentioned that before. And if you read the description again I specifically mention that some details had been left out. Perhaps, this is one of them. And as far as timing, their release, and what was holding them. All done by simply taping the the fuse of the flower or flasher to the flare itself. As the flare gets shorter, it hits the fuse, the fuse ignites, no longer holding the flasher in place, and lighting it at the same time. TA DA!!!
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP ah, that would be a clever trick. however it's ovbvious you're making this up as you go along.
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
Actually, it is obvious, i mean "ovbvious" that the Objective Observer really isn't so objective.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
Americans, always trying to get easy money.
Mephistto 1 year ago
hold on i got another one:
- rocket fuses? are you kidding? it takes a while for balloons to reach an altitude of several thousand feet. those must have been some really long model rocket fuses. and it's a miracle they stayed lit durng the entire ascent considering how cold and windy it is up there.
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
Actually, around four to six feet or so of fuse, green fuse (water resistant) burns at 24 seconds per foot red fuse (water proof) burns at 30 seconds a foot. I've used both. Ever used rocket fuse? I am pretty sure water resistant and water proof also means cold and wind resistant, and and cold and wind proof.
Oh and did you notice how quickly that that balloon from the fun fair turned into a tiny little dot in the sky? Only a couple minutes.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 try googling visco fuses and fireworks "miraculous"
dnmhn 1 year ago
more:
- at 03:10 the 3 lights in the middle are making a nice triangle. then the top light in the triangle drops a white orb which falls and "bumps" into the light in the bottom right of the triangle. that light then MOVES UP between the other two lights in the triangle so that it is now a straight line! so how does that happen?
- and one more thing...where did it land? if it was that visible thousands of feet up, it must have been really big. so where did it land?
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
at 3:10 is actually quite interesting. keep in mind each flare is on its own at its own rate of ascent, altitude and distance from the viewer (me, although you don't believe that). Absolutely no depth perception, like looking at the flat blanket of stars in the night sky. Therefore the formation is bound to appear to change quite drastically at times when it appears they are all on the same plane. The bigger dipper doesn't look like the big dipper viewed from Pluto.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP so it was loose rope! and yet they did hold a formation. you see, it's more than "connecting the dots". depth perception only accounts for back and forth movement. a triangle can be made from any three dots, but not a RIGHT triangle(remember your geometry?). and at the beginning of the video, they are holding a perfect right triangle. then after a minute they do move a little, but only to then make a pefect EQUILATERAL triangle at 02:00! that is beyond unlikely....
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 You totally missed my point on this earlier, and still don't get it. Based on this logic that must really be a giant spoon in the night time sky. From my perspective looking at the launch from the south as it drifted north, then east, three of the lights look like a triangle. But your right, depth perception is forward and backward. SO someone looking at those same three lights from the west will still see a triangle by connecting the dots, it just looks different.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP you missed my point. a RIGHT TRIANGLE can't be formed by independantly floating balloons. let me explain:
you got 1 dot in the center and 2 dots somewhere around it. there are 360 degrees of space around the center dot where the other dots could be. regardless of depth, a right triangle could only be formed if the two outside dots are in EXACTLY the right place at the same time. the probability of this happening with independantly floating balloons is zero....
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 I am inclined to think that the possibility of an artist releasing flares hung from bags of helium is a much higher probability, than intelligent life traveling to Lehi Utah and purposely forming a series of triangles that can only be seen from a certain point on the ground, and it just so happens that I manage to be lucky enough to be at exact location, with my HD camera!!
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 Just uploaded the only two pictures I have of the the 1-26-11 "UFO" before launch. I wasn't concerned about documenting this cause I wasn't planning on it turning into a huge issue. And I actually thought that common sense and logic would prevail and people could see it for what it actually was.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
The stars in the big dipper are not all the same distance from us. Some are much further away and some are closer. But from our viewing angle here on earth they align to form "the big dipper". Hop in a UFO (i prefer triangle ones) and fly several million light years in one direction, and the big dipper no longer looks like the big dipper, as that distance and perspective change from a new vantage point. Any three dots make a triangle when you connect the dots.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
So you are also pointing out the moment it is a Right triangle (yes I remember geometry, I hated it and sucked at it) and an equilateral triangle. But simply ignoring the jibberish in between. You see what you want to see, in this case a UFO. Personally I go with flares and helium for the description, rather than ET or the Government dropping to the lower atmosphere to give us all a really cool light show and geometry lesson.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP ...and it wasn't just in that position breifly as they were randomly floating around. they held a right triangle formation for well over a minute. a clear sign of intelligent control. and if that wasn't enough, then they move into an EQUILATERAL triangle, which is even more unlikely than a right triangle! this is clear evidence of intelligent control.
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 I am getting the strong impression that you are definitely not an expert on "evidence of intelligent control." You are seeing what you want to see! You sound like the Bush administration selling evidence of WMD's. If you are convinced and so badly want to see an alien or other mysterious space craft you are going to bend your perspective and abuse the evidence to that end.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 Try this, take three pushpins, put them in the wall making a perfect right triangle. Step back a few feet, mentally “connect the dots” looks great, now step to the left five feet, “connect the dots” again, not quite the right triangle it was anymore. Move anywhere in the room and you will get a different triangle from the same three points. Perhaps even an equilateral one. And this is all being done on a single flat plain, eliminating the HUGE factor of distance.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4 When you say they hold their formation PERFECTLY in a right triangle, not true. If you look closely you can see that they never stay in perfect formation. They are constantly moving. Just very slowly, reason for this. They were drifting away from me, and already at least a mile away, if not more. Objects at a distance tend to appear to not move as fast as they really are. A jetliner flying some 300- 400 miles an hour appears to slowly and gracefully move across the sky.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
Strange how the stupid saying of my 5th grade art teacher seems to keep coming into play. “Draw what you see, not what you think you see”
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
Where did it land? I have no idea, where did that last balloon you let go from the fun fair land. You tell me?
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
more reasons why they aren't flares and you are a liar:
- at 01:50 the light at the top begins "dropping" other white orbs of light. care to explain that?
- in order for the lights to hold a formation, you must have connected them with "steel wire" as you say. but then why does the formation change?...
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
-at 1:50 what is being dropped are more ground bloom flowers and "lightning flasher" fireworks, the ones that strobe really bright, also sometimes called "signal flares" (a bit ironic).
- the flares were not connected, other than the top two lights which were tangled. The wire only goes from the bags down to the flare. Although when launched they are tethered by a single fuse. Then they separate. The formation is nothing but the mind playing "connect the dots".
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP how come in your description you say you used "5 flares", but now you're saying you used more?
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
here's why it is obvious you are lying:
- two of the witnesses in the news broadcast were ex-military. they are very familiar with flares(one of them manufactured flares as his job) and said these were definately not flares.
- flares produce a stream of light and sparks. these are perfectly spherical orbs.
- at 00:11 you can see another orb appear, fall then dissapear. at 00:21 the light at the top splits into two. that's 6 lights. you said you only used 5 flares...
ObjectiveObserver4 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
-First guy in ABC 4 interview "What was being DROPPED were not flares" womens husband, "What was being seen was not a military exercise" nothing to do with flares other than he used to make them. That's right, it wasn't a military exercise, and what was being dropped was not flares.
- If I am not mistaken, any source of light from a distance looks like and "orb", street lights, flashlights, campfires, oh and flares. (note the obvious smoke in my 1-26-11 "UFO" video)
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
-at 00:11 the "Orb" falling is actually a ground bloom flower firework as it fell away from the flare above it then burnt out.
-at 00:21 it is not a single light in the first place. That's called a camera zoom, you know, when you zoom in on something that looks like a single light but it is actually two. (although at that moment, the "flower" mentioned before can still be seen falling. Almost looking like another flare, it is still the same flower falling from before)
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ObjectiveObserver4
One more thing, the two lights or "Orbs" as you like to call them, in the top left corner are actually two bundles of three flares. Should have each been three individual lights. But they obviously got tangled and did not separate, so they made the trip in a bundle. Hence the reason they are brighter lights as well.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
To clarify, if it was uploaded and posted by me, I filmed it. If it is s link or a favorite in a playlist someone else did.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
Tell ya what.. I'll believe it was ASmithSculp when I see a video of him making his "UFO", launching is "UFO", and his "UFO" flying. Every video that ASmithSculp referencs was not taken by him. And I'd like for him to explain how his "UFO" was seen in California on the same night. Not that I don't believe him, I'd just like to know since he's in "full disclosure" mode.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Do you believe him or not..."I'll believe it...when I see a video..." vs "not that I don't believe him." I think the main reason he is not providing details is that it is so damn simple that if others knew exactly what he did there would be an "alien invasion" every night. You don't believe him and won't believe him. Opinions on creationism, global warming, etc...all show that evidence doesn't always outweigh conviction. You are convinced this is a ufo no matter what he shows.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn You hit the nail on the head. It was so easy, yeah, a little curiosity is fun I'll admit, but bottom line. I don't think it is a good idea to have every 14 year old across the country doing the same thing.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Your right, every video was not taken by me, that's what makes it so cool is that so many people saw it. So why is it that I am the only one who has HD video of BOTH events, including the very beginning of the 1-26-11 launch.
Everyone says, "how come your UFO was seen in CA, or IL, and etc." Well it wasn't, that was something totally different. For all I know they are actual UFO's, that would be awesome. But in all likelihood it is either someone else like me, or something else.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP Then lets see a video or pictures of your project. The claim is worthless without proof.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
Comment removed
dnmhn 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 okay, he has said he used flares, garbage bags, and helium. Not incredibly specific but it adds up nicely. His own HD video is posted of both events, including the ignition of the first one (I think) that shows that he knew it was going to light up before it lit up and shows smoke. It is also funny to watch eye witness accounts that describe in awe that it looked like flares and fireworks.....maybe because it was flares and fireworks? If he shows you I'm sure you will just copy
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn No, he specifically said none of the videos were his. Still, there is no proof in the pudding and at this time, he's doing nothing but gleaming for his 5 minutes of fame... and that's over.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Please read carefully! He says none of the videos in Chicago, California, etc....are his. He has posted his own video of both Utah events that he filmed personally and then posted. Others captured video of the same event that caused the initial news stories and he claims no responsibility or knowledge of the events outside of Utah County. If you are pissed off about his 5 minutes of fame stop posting on the video.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn Dude... what part of him saying "Your right, every video was not taken by me,....." including this one. Christ, I swear people can not read anymore......
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 I'll concede he didn't describe it too clearly but technically all this sentence is saying is that there are multiple videos of the "event" on youtube and "every video was not taken by me" means that he is not claiming responsibility for every video but he is not saying that he is not responsible for some of the videos. We can argue semantics in this case but he follows by clearly claiming that he has his own HD video of both events (posted here and linked in his description)
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn Again, what part of "Your right, every video was not taken by me.." do you not understand to mean he made any of the videos? There is no reason to argue semantics in this case, his words are clear. Again, if he truly is responsible for this, a simple picture of the "contraption" is simple. I for one, do not believe he is responsible for this event in Utah, as this "UFO" was seen in several states hundreds of miles apart, on the same night. Do I believe it's ET? No.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 you are stuck on one vaguely worded phrase that can be interpreted differently and now you can't see the forest for the trees. Look at the new stories, his other videos, and the details he does provide. Unless you come back with something particularly outlandish I'll leave it at this as we have already strayed into what you "believe" so any logical argument isn't going anywhere anyway. Why is your burden of proof for other claims so low? You hear and see what you want to believe
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn I don't believe it was him unless he has actual video or pictures. You however, are constantly defending him without any proof. There is no burden of proof he submits that this "thing" in the air is his, hence he has no claim.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 No use continuing the argument with you as your mind is already made up. I suspect he could show you pictures and provide details and you would still be skeptical. Now I just wish I could join you in a game of poker; you seem reckless with the odds (helium filled bags lifted flares vs. alien spaceship....I'll bet on the flares every time) and your sense of the bluff is pretty warped.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn Never knew a court case to be won simply by someone saying "I didn't do it!". Evidence is what gives the burden of proof. Smith has not presented one bit of evidence to support his claim. And obviously you must have a hard time reading... I did say that I did not believe it to be "ET". Personally, I believe YOU to be Smith using a different name, since your account was just created on 02/19/2011. Bottom line is that Mr. "Smith" has no evidence supporting his claim. Hes a fake.
yankeegal01 1 year ago
@yankeegal01 Please read carefully! He says none of the videos in Chicago, California, etc....are his. He has posted his own video of both Utah events that he filmed personally and then posted. Others captured video of the same event that caused the initial news stories and he claims no responsibility or knowledge of the events outside of Utah County. If you are pissed off about his 5 minutes of fame stop posting on the video.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn
Actually, it was more like 3 minutes of fame.
ASMITHSCULP 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP Well I caught the same thing on video on 2/17/11 & im in Indiana.
mrstheus1 1 year ago
@mrstheus1 NO....you caught something that seems eerily similar in your opinion. Based on your logic a person convicted of crime in one place must automatically be guilty of the same crime in another city 3 days later or even worse could claim that he isn't guilty because he didn't do both. All ASMITHSCULP is saying is that he created these few events. He claims nothing more and is open to the possibility that other events might hold more meaning.
dnmhn 1 year ago
@dnmhn .......what im saying is.......regardless to whatever it is you are sayin, I have seen some strange shit in the atmosphere around here....... ya hear??? and Im out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mrstheus1 1 year ago
@mrstheus1 I can't argue about what you think you saw or didn't see...sounds creepy. I was only insisting that you not make a call on many things you haven't seen, especially when the extent of the explanation for what you have seen with your own eyes is "strange shit." ASMITHSCULP is giving information on isolated events in a specific location and not making claims or inferences on anything else.
dnmhn 1 year ago
Great job, dude!
Sorry kids, no aliens here today. So many kids think disclosure is going to arrive on youtube. LOL. When the aliens arrive it will be on the news. Youtube is for "UFO" videos of satellites, Venus, airplanes, bugs, birds, bats, kites, hang-gliders, Chinese lanterns, R/C planes with LED lights, etc. ... and now whatever this creation is from an interesting artist.
Very impressive.
ufoguy1962 1 year ago
This is hilarious. There are already web comments linking to this video, and saying "Oh this is amazing...the debunkers will have such a hard time with this video." Nicely done, dude.
ultrapirtle 1 year ago
Mr. smith is a failing artist
with a bunch of junk he calls art
thats why he wanted attention
REALUFOCLIPS 1 year ago 2
@REALUFOCLIPS I think he was just having some fun and you need to chill out. I can understand being angry but your incessant and childish posts don't do your cause any good at all. I bet you are the person alluded to in the new description that has been calling and making harassing phone calls. If you don't want him to get attention stop giving him so much of it!
dnmhn 1 year ago
you see Mr. Smith it didnt work
you failed
ha ha ha
your too easy
REALUFOCLIPS 1 year ago 2
@REALUFOCLIPS what failed? it seems like he was just trying to play around and have some fun? If he was trying to make it a hoax he could have said nothing and there would still be many people insisting it was real....in fact you and others still seem to insist that very thing.
dnmhn 1 year ago
hoaxers piss me off
zezt 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP Hi Andrew, I guessed a while back that if you were to get this effect you would use balloons as oppose to lanterns and attach flares to achieve the phosphorescent brightness . Guessing you must have illuminated the balloons with red LEDs is that so? This goes to show that you need more than just video footage on its own as evidence of real ariel phenomenon. Cheers
inspectorcrud 1 year ago
good work :)
nublex 1 year ago
how do you get them to line up in that shape too? they look so perfect?
indibabs122275 1 year ago
wow thats a great catch!
indibabs122275 1 year ago
Mr. Smith, I'm a dedicated UFO researcher and I wasn't fooled by your artistic exhibition. Why did you pull such a stunt again, after you said in the news interview, that you did not want this to spiral out of control? You realize that magnesium flares are not a simple class 2 fire hazard. They are classified as a class 7 "Explosive", and you were dropping these to the ground and onto your neighbor's houses? You should be investigated by the authorities. Stop the Art Project! DR
hotstunts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my sister and I saw that out here in Chino, California in September
AShadowsWhisper 1 year ago
any idiot can tell those are not flares
we don't think you hoaxed it
theUFOCentral 1 year ago
this guy did not hoax this
he wants attention
and nothing more
look at his shitty art
theUFOCentral 1 year ago
@ASMITHSCULP
you humiliated yourself
and we laugh at you
for your stupidity
REALUFOCLIPS 1 year ago
Asmithculp you humiliated yourself in front of everyone
that is why we think your childish
REALUFOCLIPS 1 year ago
I saw this that night as it was happening amazing looks like one giant craft to me, the lights were bright red and there were white lights coming out of it to the ground.
consciouswellnessnow 1 year ago
Many sightings like these recently. This creeps me out.
vania1917 1 year ago
This one of the best UFO clips I have ever seen. Respect.
Greeting from Southern England Watchers.
Peace
TheGoodEnemy 1 year ago
I think my point still stands "Utah County's UFO" in quotes should have made anyone at least think twice
dnmhn 1 year ago
@REALUFOCLIPS your obsession undermines your credibility! I think you need to chill out a little bit....it seems like you wanted this to be real so badly, in fact you believed it was real and now you are pissed because this guy is telling you it is a simple party trick.
dnmhn 1 year ago
Those who believe in the UFO phenomenon don't appreciate red herrings. You knew these object were indeed identified when you posted this video with "UFO" in the title.
BumperMorgan 1 year ago
@BumperMorgan Hence "UF0" not UFO
dnmhn 1 year ago