Added: 3 years ago
From: 01DOGG01
Views: 168,123
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • flaming cumsplatter simulator

  • help when i run it it loads properly but it lags and when i change the particles to 120 it says it cannot run!

  • I was just waiting for him to say something like, 'I'll be back...' or 'Get To The Choppa!' maybe even "Asta La Vista Baby!'

  • how can you make this fire my fluid mark makes red sheres

  • @mischa1900 ;( me too

  • the droplets look too...big

  • What the fuck is this? for real i don't know.

  • you ocan only play this game if you have Nvidia video driver?

  • accurate reconstruction of Chuck Norris pissing.

  • Like ur Russian accent :)

  • It would be a lot cooler if you could move the ball around

  • Again, "PhysX" violates the law of conservation of matter.

  • XD

  • god i love your accent

  • i sense dance ejay...2?

  • pretty cool while i was high. but overall.... the video was gay

  • GET TO THE CHOPPA, NOW!!!

  • On my old ATI graphiccard and it looks same how in the video

  • You probably couldn't have chosen a worse song for this video

  • can you simulate ejeculation with this??

  • can i use this on my pc i have an ati graphics card

  • the let it go song in the description isn't at the link you pasted lmk where i can get it thanks.

  • Comment removed

  • And it takes modeling programs like realflow 3 hours to render this....

  • WHY I CANT RUN IT? IT SAYS SOMETHING WITH BUILD AND WITH VERSION... at one says that i dont own something...

  • @puke1523 What is your video card?

  • @01DOGG01 idk...

  • @01DOGG01 he has ati card...ahahaha

  • @puke1523 your card may not be compatible with CUDA or PHYSX

  • verry laggy?

  • nice video

  • Now that just looks like dhiaria being flung into the air and casted on a ball piling up in a mountain like form then lagging a minute or two later.

  • can you use meta-balls? that would make it a LOT better. and i think the particles have too much friction... but pretty good for realtime.

  • @aninjainatree I didn't make this...

  • @01DOGG01 oh...

  • help please!

    when i download v1.1.1 its says something wrong with driver...

    when i download v.1.2.0 its says i dont own PhysX

  • @puke1523 Use the latest nvidia drivers

  • @01DOGG01 ??

  • favorite + like ;)

  • Comment removed

  • fully sic

  • my computer can handle partciles, but not redering...........that sucks becasue i love this....i need an alianware system

  • @JuniorProducer1996 Alienware? Bunch of overpriced hardware.

  • @asaguda

    i know, but its cool looking and it actually has the power i need, having the coclors and such is just cool :)

  • @JuniorProducer1996 To each their own, I suppose. I'm a gamer, and we tend to go for function rather than visual appeal. ;P

  • @asaguda

    i know, i like the power......but the cool glowing main tower takes away from the not too cool image of me playing Crysis in the middle of the night

  • @JuniorProducer1996

    You can build a much cooler looking system with better hardware for cheaper. With the money you save not buying an OEM machine, you could add watercooling, buy a case with a glass panel, and throw in some leds of your choice.

  • @TheCuriosity7

    i cant, i dont know how to work with physical computers, i can work with software. and the only access to computer parts i have is my xbox....and those arent compatible with my desktop... :/

  • @JuniorProducer1996

    It's very easy... these are the components to make a computer work: CPU, Motherboard, Memory (RAM), PSU, Hard drive. To install an operating system, you need a disc drive (or you can just install the os through a usb stick), and for graphics, you need a gpu (graphics card). You will also want a case to keep the components in. THAT'S it. And buying these parts and fitting them together is much cheaper than buying them already put together.

  • @TheCuriosity7

    that is true, but unfortunately im an extreme gamer nerd and saving like 500 dollars for the games that are coming out this year, and i need 150 for the legendary edition of halo: reach

    and i would go to circuit city to buy all that, but they're closed

  • @JuniorProducer1996

    Circuit city wouldn't be the place for that, a computer hardware store or Newegg.com is. Yeah definitely don't go out and build a whole new system, but you should keep it in mind next time you want to upgrade. It'll save you a ton of money, plus you'll have it exactly how you want it :) .

  • @TheCuriosity7

    would you know any types of CPU's ? i want a quad-core....or more if i can, that would be awesome. really i just want the computer to play Crysis on High with no lag, if i can get that, then i have my computer

  • @JuniorProducer1996

    It depends on your motherboard... the cpu socket will determine what type of cpu you can use. For current quad-cores, your choices are amd phenom ii x4, intel i5, or intel i7s. I like AMD for their value to performance.

    An easier upgrade that will definitely let you play Crysis on at least high is just swapping your video card. Get a good card from the Radeon 5000 series or any card from the nvidia 400 series (or even the 200 series).

  • @TheCuriosity7

    yes but i only have a single core cpu and its not very powerful, so im not sure if just updating my graphics card could help, i know they take the physics and graphics, but the processing would burn my cpu

    and how much would an AMD cost, per core

  • @JuniorProducer1996

    Don't but an AMD processor, you want to go for an Intel i7 2600K or an i5 2500K. The amount of cores doesn't matter to the processing speed. The i7 2600K has 4 cores and, compared to the best AMD Hexa-Core processor, it scored 70~ more points on a benchmark.

  • @AETutorials42 ...While costing $150 more. Then add in the fact that most Intel motherboards have a bad feature/price ratio.

  • @IAmSomeoneOrOther

    I didn't buy an Intel motherboard, I bought one from Gigabyte. The Z68A is perfectly fine for its cost. I overclocked the processor to 4.5GHz without issue, and I have no experience at all when it comes to entering the Bios and editing the frequency settings. I DO know, however, that AMD likes to market its products based on cores, but in the performance charts, they fall short.

  • @TheCuriosity7 i play crysis on a 9800 and it runs fine on high. :)

  • Its funny that graphics are still not good enough to emulate liquid substances. Jesus. I mean... theres alot of "close attempts" but its just not quite there yet.

  • @hl2og Graphics....Liquid is more of a visual animation.Liquid follows many paths so it's hard to predict accurate settings.Graphics wise,your speaking of the materials the people use to create the appearance of water or any other substance.

  • @hl2og Its not graphics its mathematical formulas. They are quite accurate but you need powerful processing hardware (CPU etc) to do th calculations

    What you are talking about is a visual simulation using textures. These days they apply textures to particles because you cant render enough to make them too small to see

    When you render millions of particles using mathematical formulas, graphics trickery is not needed to give the appearance of a substance. Just transparency, coloring and lighting

  • @01DOGG01

    He's just trying to say it doesn't look completely real yet, which is a valid opinion. Looking at this you can instantly tell it's CG.

    A certain degree of graphics trickery is always involved. Bump maps for instance, and occlusion culling.

    Nature can't be reduced to calculations of particle movement, because on the quantum scale laws of physics start to break down (ie. Heisenberg's Uncertainty).

    So when we try to model nature with calculations it looks close but not real.

  • @hl2og You know this fluidmark is 2 years old right? Water looks way better now.

  • @hl2og You don't know a lot about physics right?

  • how is that "interactive". All you're doing is panning around the action. There's no interaction between viewer and action.

  • i was expecting a fluid sim, not a random vid of pee being squirted onto a ball.

    .

    .

    .

    nice vid btw

  • It'd be nice if nVidia didn't do everything in their power to stop ATI card owners from using an older nVidia card as a PhysX Processor.

  • my results, FPS: min=30  max=316 avg=60

  • canyou make a video of the piss physx pouring on a little girl and can you put in a model of r-kelly for where the pee is coming from

  • Good idea. I can do that in oe-cake...

  • @KoolDudester

    You /b/ fanboys need to calm down.

  • @KoolDudester boondocks :)

  • Type "nzone_physxgames_all" into google and click the first link.

    You will then come to the realisation that you're an ignorant tool as you scroll through the list of 200 or so games.

  • just a shame Nvidia lie to its customers by saying full screen video (mirroring with overlay) - when it has blatantly removed this function from drivers. Dumb asses.

  • music made with ejay tsk tsk

  • can you run PhysX and DirectX11 at the same time? use PhysX to share the load, and DirectX to reduce the total load?

  • it doesn't work like that

  • i know (now) I finally got the PhysX SDK, and am programming in it (sorta) now. thanks :)

  • nice :)

  • whats physx?

  • Using your video card to do stuff your cpu used to have to.

    It's faster and it frees up your cpu for other stuff. But you need a decent card.

  • @mdogg1267 Dude, well look it up, don't make yourself a target for people to pick on you for coming on a video that you dont know.

    To answer your question, it's a 3D program.

  • "a 3d program"

    I think YOU need to look it up...

  • @01DOGG01 sorry for not putting down the exact reason of being created. It's a benchmark program that shows you how good your graphics/computer is by testing out different stuff. This one test's how many particles can run on your PC. There's game test's and etc. There you go. 3dsbenchmark is another one as well.

  • I find it QUITE IRONIC that you should tell people to look stuff up before talking when AGAIN you've given totally wrong information because you haven't taken your own advice.

    PhysX is like CUDA or DirectX. It is NOT a benchmark tool. That's FluidMark.

  • Its a physics engine made for Nvidia CARDS, used in not so many games.

    Its not a benchmark tool at all

  • so the games mirrors edge, warmonger, cryostasis and many other which use this are all benchmark programms? Its totaly not a benchmark thing.

  • is ther a version for mac???

  • If it's not on their site then no.

  • 0:04  Benchmark tuul :D

  • so who is the one peying on the ball?

  • And i just wasted two seconds of my life, reading your selfish and stupid comment.

  • funny, I felt he same way about your comment. Do you really think anyone cares if you thought it was boring?

  • i downloaded it looks cool

  • haha some one uses ejay for there background music lol

  • The credits are in the info :P

  • first i thought you were microsoft sam, then it sounded german, then i began to understand you xD

  • LOL microsoft sam... ouch.

  • same, german, xD

  • Hours and hours of fun!!

  • It's a benchmark program genius.

  • you amused the shit out of me, seriously!

  • Well then, you are easily amused :D

  • yeah xD

  • i had this program and its pure bullshit ... its not fluid simulation... just a bunch of 2D particles lol ^^

  • Well you obviously know jack shit about fluid simulation. This is the underlying framework, just like a polygon mesh is to a 3d model.

  • Isn't that what OE-Cake is? Just a bunch of 2D particles?

    While this may not be as detailed, the particles are in a 3D space.

    It's meant to be a benchmark, not a fluid simulation.

  • where do you get software to play around with things and physx?

  • U get the drivers off the nvidia site...

    If u want to play around with physics, check out my oe-cake videos...

  • aa tanks

  • I thought u were talking about AA (anti-alaising) for a second :)

  • Comment removed

  • Install all the appropriate drivers and physx stuff, etc

  • that ball needs to be shaped into a female face

  • hahahha and the lava need to be something else right

  • well....you know

  • its really fucking weird and hilarious that out of lava shooting on a rock you turn that into a girl receiving a facial.....

  • white goo...

  • id rather see shit.

  • be my guest :D

  • Oh Jesus.

    30000?

    I don't have a GPU.

    Will that rape my PC like INFINITUM?:P

  • A GPU is a Graphics Processing Unit (video card) so i'd say that you do :)

    This runs on both GPU and CPU (if you don't have nvidia/physx).

    What will rape like infinitum?

    IFMY

    IFMYTVKES?

  • Lol well I skipped most of the vid becouse I had no fucking sound V:

  • The website is being a fag Lol How many particales where there in that?

  • The answer is only 12 seconds into the video :/

  • Dogg how old are you?

  • That's a trade secret :P

  • ok ok whatever =P

  • ali mogu ti reci da sam hrvat :)

  • a mozes :) sta nisi prije reka :))

  • This is a CPU Benchmark too because ATI cards dont have PhysX.

  • then use NVIDIA! LOL!

  • I dont will use nvidia but they are too bad for me.

    Ati new cards that this year come out have a gpu clock of 1ghz and a memory clock of 4ghz.

  • That's rubbish. Nvidia is absolutely smoking ATi at the moment. If you have an actual look at actual benchmarks you'd know this.

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 295 destroys ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2.

    I don't know where you got those GHz numbers from, but they mean nothing. Because a 1ghz core2 would demolish a 1ghz pentium 2. It's about the design.

  • a core2 have 2or4core´s and pentium 2 have only one.

  • Well, that's part of the design isn't it?

    Forget that though.

    What about a E8400 vs E6850. Both are Core2 (2 core) running at 3GHz. Yet the E8400 is between 1-10% faster depending on the benchmark.

    E6750 vs E8200/E8190 (all 2.67GHz). Same speed different performance.

  • the E8400 have a bigger L2 Cache!

    you should better use i7 965 extreme and amd phenom II X4 955 to show that its the about design. they have same clock speed and the same l2 cache

  • Yeah who cares. I can't be bothered looking that up.

    The point was that it's about design (eg L2), and not raw MHz. And nvidia is winning at the moment. Until ATi can come up with something better...

    You said that nvidia is bad, and this simply isn't true. Especially because you can do physx on it.

  • The 4870X2 isn't that new, the GTX 295 only just came out!

    Though I don't want any GPU war arguments please :(

  • Me neither.

    Like the actual GPU wars between nvidia and ati, it would never end..

  • TERRIBLE MUSIC

  • Go whinge to Ella Star DJ then.

    Seriously, this is a video about fluidmark. The music is there to add a bit of ambience.

    I'm getting quite sick of people talking shit about it.

  • haha ejay is rubish get abelton

  • If you actually bothered to read more than one word in the video info, you'd notice that i didn't make the music.

  • ejay music

  • Damn I was hoping to be the first to have noticed that. I haven`t heard these sounds in aaages!!

  • yeah man propa old school, i remember when i got danceejay and raveejayway back in mid 90's. Funny shit coz ive still got a good few of the tunes i made. :P

  • ROCK TO THE RHYTHM!!!!!!

  • nvidia 9500 gt it's good or...better wait a little and buy a 9800gts ?

  • A 9800GT is exactly the same as an 8800GT. And they're far superior to the 9500GT.

    As for the 9800GTS, i don't know as it's not out yet and there are only rumours about it so far.

  • ok,thanks

  • NP.

    Oh, and also take into consideration that the 9800GTX+ is also the same as a GTS 250.

  • i dont understand how a different series is the same as and older or newer series... like i have the 9800gt but according to your reply i could have save $ and instead buy the 8800gt?

  • On paper, the default design says that they both pump out 9600MP/s and 33600MT/s. Individual manufacturers may increase clock speed a bit.

    Wiki: "Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units"

    Nvidia will re-use the same core for "new" GPUs in a "new" series. It's just marketing.

  • The G92 core is used in: 8800 GS 8800 GT 8800 GTS 9600 GSO 9800 GT (G92a/b) 9800 GTX 9800 GTX+ (G92b) 9800 GX2 GTS 150 (G92b) GTS 250 (G92a/b)
  • So as you can see, it spans 3 generations. What makes them different, is core configuration - how many shading units and such are active. And of course how fast it's clocked.

    There are older versions of the 8800GT, but the 'modern' one is pretty much a carbon copy of the 9800GT.

  • In fact, the only thing which makes the cards different, is that they added an extra SLi connector so you can do 3-way SLi on the 9800GT.

  • wtf 3 way SLi? whos needs 3 cards to work together? unless your making a movie

  • Some fool at nvidia seems to think that we can all afford motherboards with 3 PCIe×16 connectors, not to mention the cards...

    It's just their way of trying to milk every last cent out of us.

  • i have 1 sound card spot and a graphics card spot... but i have an extra slot that i dont know what its for? my mother board is like 5+ yrs old too. and my 9800gt covers the slot wit the fan so its kinda useless

  • maybe differnt manufacturing proccess 65nm to 55 nm??

  • Yeah. But if the clock speed stays the same it won't change a thing. So there's no use for them pretending that it's a new video card.

  • but it would run cooler and oc farther?

    they should have cranked the clock by like 5 mhz and claim its brand new :)

  • a 55nm so much watt and can get higher clocks because he is not so hot.

  • It's only 13 C.

    But nvidia don't do that. The clocks are the same...

  • ATI do this i think.

    because nvidia have a clock speed about 620 and ati have about 900.

  • How many mhz it runs at is largely dependant on the design. You can't just compare them like that.

    For example, i bet a 1ghz core2 duo would beat a 3ghz pentium2.

  • tottaly...

  • *snicker*

    Looks like someone peeing orange Gatorade powder onto a ball.

  • LOL yeh a few people have mentioned this :)

  • this made made my comp crash XD WATCHING THE VID NOT CUDA

  • why is it ATI boast they have it all but there is never any public demo of GPU physics.

    it sucks.

  • Actually there are a few free demos on their site. They have video demos, but you can download them as 3d.

  • what you mean that stupid furbles thing?? Too late anyway i have my Nvidia card now and there are tons of working demos and software utilizing CUDA its great. I think ATI are trying to hide the fact that they decided to throw away GP-GPU and now cant utilize it with the current architechture.

  • ...I Didn't say anything about furbles...and there are heaps of demos. I have 3 right now. They're specific to each graphics card.

  • Random swedish dork leaves negative comment in video...

    Carefactor = 0

  • trust me all swedish ppl rn't like him

  • Yeah don't worry, i know :)

    "Every village has an idiot" as they say...

  • Whats your graphics card?

    and does the size of the particles change if your gpu is better?

    Also kick ass accent :D