S6.5 AMG [0-100km(62ml) per hour/ 4.4 sec] Exactly the same as BMW M5!
Then, (0-200km S6.5 accelerates for 13.3 sec, M5 accelerates for 13.5sec)
Finally, the standart distance for the drag race equals 402m or 440yrd, so S6.5 AMG is 12.6 sec. M5 is 12.3sec!
As we can see, W221 S 6.5 AMG isn't faster than M5, S 6.5 AMG is faster only in the middle of race, but M5 gets finish faster! I'm tired to hear that S-class is faster than M5.
my boss drives an s65.. he whooped on an alpina the other day.. amazing ride.. rather get the cl but that merc wasn't a 65 or even an amg.. not even a 600
depends how short the race is... keep in mind the S65's power isnt that much more than the m5 until after say 150km/h where 2 turbos and twice the torque take over. and then its all over
i don't belive that was a s65...maybe a s500 with amg kitts or something...the 65 does 0-100 in 4,3 sec...and that is average...it can do 4 sec if the weather is good for perfect traction
you guys make me sick,u actually believe the m5 is faster becuz it won for a shirt distance off a stop, try managing 728 lbs of torque from 0mph the s65 is tremendously faster to even race the two is a complete insult
You don't know much about physics :-) The maximum hp and air resistance is almost all that matters for top speed. The weight will almost make no difference. The s65 has 20% more hp. It does NOT have 20% higher air resistance. The cw is actually lower for the S-class than the M5. MB has laways had very low drag coeffs on their cars.
So the M5 will have no chance at higher speeds. At lower speeds it will have a small chance though since the S65 is much heavier.
hahaha olagum one think you are right that S65 amg will destroy the m5 but no after 140 mp/h i don't belive that S65 amg can keep up to 211 mp/h 140 mp/h -211mp/h i don't thin so !!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you poster for the SEDAN vs SEDAN not coupe vs sedan bs...Heres how it breaks out - M5 has 500LB, gear ratio (in either setup), and axle ratio advantage; 65 has 100HP and DOUBLE TQ, displacement and twin turbo, and drag coefficient advantage. With that said, the only reason the 65 should lose to 120 is traction issues. To 160, as cars gain speed they need more output just to overcome the forces. The M5 weight/gears just aren't enough to outdo the ouput and drag coefficient edge of the 65.
true, but one of the big reasons why the M5 is really fast at higher speeds (and able to reach 205mph with the speed limiter removed) is because of it has two more gears to burn through over the S65 (7 speed SMG vs 5 speed automatic), which would essentially make up for the higher drag coefficient and the lack of output and torque compared to the 65. Matter of fact, the 6 speed Manual version of the M5 is almost 4 seconds slower than its SMG counterpart to 150mph.
this was an ordinary S500 or even S420 CDI....cos if we look how much difference was between them at the end we can assume what it is!!! Just to know that S600, S63 are little faster than M5....but S65 AMG is totally another world compared to the M5...it destroyes BMW
LETS PRETEND THE M5 WAS FASTER...BUT I WOULD PICK THE S65 BECAUSE ITS GORGEOUS...
itsreal1971 1 week ago
S6.5 AMG [0-100km(62ml) per hour/ 4.4 sec] Exactly the same as BMW M5!
Then, (0-200km S6.5 accelerates for 13.3 sec, M5 accelerates for 13.5sec)
Finally, the standart distance for the drag race equals 402m or 440yrd, so S6.5 AMG is 12.6 sec. M5 is 12.3sec!
As we can see, W221 S 6.5 AMG isn't faster than M5, S 6.5 AMG is faster only in the middle of race, but M5 gets finish faster! I'm tired to hear that S-class is faster than M5.
S6.5 AMG is faster than M5, this's bull shit!
M5 is faster!
TeVitaly 8 months ago
my boss drives an s65.. he whooped on an alpina the other day.. amazing ride.. rather get the cl but that merc wasn't a 65 or even an amg.. not even a 600
calibred818 1 year ago
Yes , that was a S 500 with Amg package .. The S 65 ///AMG kill out M5 ... 612 hp V12 BI-TURBO VS 507 HP .. Ș))
AlbutAlex 1 year ago
dont make excuses the cars are not are not even in the same class . E vs 5 and S vs 7
tom80cruise 2 years ago
That was AMG S65 the driver had a bad start if you look at the end he was catching up to the BMW! =)
InfiniteMaC 2 years ago
that was a s500 vs a m5.. the s65 would kill the m5
schemed1 2 years ago 13
true!
PEROlozhach 2 years ago
depends how short the race is... keep in mind the S65's power isnt that much more than the m5 until after say 150km/h where 2 turbos and twice the torque take over. and then its all over
maverick223 2 years ago
@schemed1 i agree with you s65 will kill any bmw
Nikolozs63 1 year ago
A stock S65 AMG is faster all the way, all the gears than any stock BMW..inform and read yourself
jdydbgdsy 2 years ago 6
i don't belive that was a s65...maybe a s500 with amg kitts or something...the 65 does 0-100 in 4,3 sec...and that is average...it can do 4 sec if the weather is good for perfect traction
drey63 2 years ago
this is not a s65amg
vinsinaty15 3 years ago 4
How do you know? You can barely tell which one is the benz and which is the bmw, let alone what model it is
Axilrod 2 years ago 2
you guys make me sick,u actually believe the m5 is faster becuz it won for a shirt distance off a stop, try managing 728 lbs of torque from 0mph the s65 is tremendously faster to even race the two is a complete insult
AMGkompressor20 3 years ago
S65 is faster but at higher speeds (over 260km/h)is the M5 faster
ankotheboss 3 years ago
You don't know much about physics :-) The maximum hp and air resistance is almost all that matters for top speed. The weight will almost make no difference. The s65 has 20% more hp. It does NOT have 20% higher air resistance. The cw is actually lower for the S-class than the M5. MB has laways had very low drag coeffs on their cars.
So the M5 will have no chance at higher speeds. At lower speeds it will have a small chance though since the S65 is much heavier.
m96gran 3 years ago 2
hahaha olagum one think you are right that S65 amg will destroy the m5 but no after 140 mp/h i don't belive that S65 amg can keep up to 211 mp/h 140 mp/h -211mp/h i don't thin so !!!!!!!!!!!
TZIRNI 3 years ago
S65 Will beat the M5 from the dig, but after 120mph, the M5 will start catching up and actually beats it to 160mph.
MyTubeUser321 3 years ago 4
Thank you poster for the SEDAN vs SEDAN not coupe vs sedan bs...Heres how it breaks out - M5 has 500LB, gear ratio (in either setup), and axle ratio advantage; 65 has 100HP and DOUBLE TQ, displacement and twin turbo, and drag coefficient advantage. With that said, the only reason the 65 should lose to 120 is traction issues. To 160, as cars gain speed they need more output just to overcome the forces. The M5 weight/gears just aren't enough to outdo the ouput and drag coefficient edge of the 65.
ibemerjb123abc 3 years ago
true, but one of the big reasons why the M5 is really fast at higher speeds (and able to reach 205mph with the speed limiter removed) is because of it has two more gears to burn through over the S65 (7 speed SMG vs 5 speed automatic), which would essentially make up for the higher drag coefficient and the lack of output and torque compared to the 65. Matter of fact, the 6 speed Manual version of the M5 is almost 4 seconds slower than its SMG counterpart to 150mph.
MyTubeUser321 3 years ago
sike
x0sl55 3 years ago
wtf?! i'm sure it wasn't s65 amg w221, s600 would have beat the e60 m5, totally another world as olaguma said
dziobo1990 3 years ago
that was not an s65 at all!!
BKsS600 3 years ago
bullshit thaths s600 i think
gulsehircity50 4 years ago
this was an ordinary S500 or even S420 CDI....cos if we look how much difference was between them at the end we can assume what it is!!! Just to know that S600, S63 are little faster than M5....but S65 AMG is totally another world compared to the M5...it destroyes BMW
olaguma 4 years ago 2
lets be serious...the m5 can't beat the s65...even it is havyer
MERCEDESrulzz 4 years ago
Yeah but Simple Bad Start For S65 and he's not gonna catch him. OVERall S65 is FASTER and i am Bimmer FAN
KarenPonch 3 years ago
WOW
MIRAG200 4 years ago